#2397 - Richard Lindzen & William Happer

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Joe Rogan Experience #2397

Guests: Richard Lindzen & William Happer
Host: Joe Rogan
Date: October 21, 2025

---

Overview

In this episode, Joe Rogan sits down with two prominent scientists: Richard "Dick" Lindzen, a retired professor of atmospheric sciences at MIT, and William "Will" Happer, a retired Princeton physics professor. The discussion centers on climate science, academic culture, the politics and funding of scientific research, the history and methodology of science, and skepticism regarding the consensus on climate change and the influence of ideology and money.

---

Guest Introductions & Backgrounds

[00:29]: Dick Lindzen’s Introduction

• Lifelong academic in atmospheric science.
• Career at Harvard, University of Washington, University of Chicago, MIT (retired in 2013).
• Early research solved “solvable problems” in atmospheric science—e.g., the quasi-biennial oscillation in equatorial winds.
• "It was a very enjoyable period until global warming." —Dick Lindzen

[02:17]: Will Happer’s Introduction

• Born in India (British Raj), parents: Scottish army officer, American scientist.
• Witnessed WWII-era Oak Ridge, TN; mother worked on Manhattan Project.
• Professor at Columbia and Princeton. Director of US Energy Research under President Bush Sr.
• Career suspicion stoked by the insular, defensive behavior of climate scientists in Washington.
• "There was one exception, that was the people working on climate. And they would always be very resentful." —Will Happer

---

Early Climate Science & Political History

[03:58]: The Politicalization of Climate

• Senator Al Gore’s early involvement; timeline of the shift from “global cooling” to “global warming.”
• Joe recalls ‘In Search Of...’ TV show warning of an ice age, then the narrative switching to warming.
• [05:14]: The demonization of CO₂ began before Al Gore’s movie, dating back to the First Earth Day (1970).

[06:59]: The Shift in Environmental Focus

• Environmental movement shifted focus to the energy sector (big business/money) from “saving the whales.”
• 1970s: From global cooling (coal’s sulfates as cause) to warming (CO₂ as main culprit).
• Suki Manabe’s modeling: the interaction of CO₂, water vapor, and warming.

---

The Role of Politics, Money, and Ideology in Climate Science

[08:04]: Money and Political Power

• Climate change as a useful issue for politicians due to the trillions of dollars at stake.
• Allegation: Politicians need only small campaign contributions from recipients of large climate spending.
• "If you're giving out that much, you don't need that much of your politician." —Dick Lindzen [08:04]

[11:21]: Lack of Scientific Debate

• Discussion of how climate change has become immune to debate; questioning it labels one as a denier.
• Comparison to other “untouchable” topics (“anti-vaxxer”).

[11:37]: The “Settled Science” Paradox

• IPCC admits uncertainties in water vapor/clouds, yet public narrative is "settled science."
• "Here you have the biggest phenomena we don't understand at all. But the science is settled. Who knows what that means?" —Dick Lindzen [11:37]

---

Effects of Climate Policies on the General Public

[13:08]: Impact on Ordinary People

• Ordinary people (“especially in France’s countryside, and perhaps in the US”) are more skeptical than elites.
• Real-world impacts: UK energy prices, forced livestock kills, developing world left behind by expensive energy transition.

[14:47]: Coal and Modern Emission Controls

• Modern coal plants can be very clean except for CO₂.
• "You can clean it, you can scrub it, you can get rid of almost everything except CO₂." —Dick Lindzen [14:58]

---

Trust in Science and the Nature of Scientific Inquiry

[17:42]: "Trust Science" vs. Scientific Methodology

• Science is a methodology, not an authority to be trusted uncritically.
• The confusion between technological success and the process of science.

[19:12]: Manipulation of Data and Narratives

• Example: Al Gore’s presentation of ice age and CO₂ cycles misrepresented causality.
• CO₂ increases have made Earth greener, more arable land.

[21:38]: Suppression of Dissent in Academia

• Consensus used to discourage questioning; not how science works.
• "It should be the first thing that makes you suspicious." —Dick Lindzen [21:56]

---

Climate Data and Historical Perspective

[23:19]: Misinterpretation of Small Temperature Changes

• Discussion of core samples showing small temperature shifts (5° difference between now and last glacial max); politicians hype half or one-degree changes for fear.
• "Somebody says one degree, a half degree... I deal with that between 9:00am and 10:00am." —Dick Lindzen [23:35]

[25:41]: Last Ice Age

• During the last glacial maximum, humans were nearly wiped out due to low CO₂ and lack of food, not temperature per se.
• "You get down to 160, 150 [ppm CO₂], all life would die." —Dick Lindzen [26:32]

---

Politicization and Funding in Science

[35:14]: Grant Funding Drives Consensus

• Universities chase overhead from climate grants; consensus grows due to financial incentives.
• "The love of money is the root of all evil. And in universities... you're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars, you know, for construction." —Will Happer [35:14]

[37:39]: Overhead and Misallocated Grant Funds

• Only a portion of research funding supports actual research.

---

Media Framing and “Settled” Narratives

[41:39]: Social Pressures and Censorship

• Academics and scientists “pull you aside in quiet corners” to quietly admit climate skepticism.
• Publicly, skepticism is suppressed for social and financial reasons.

---

Metrics, Models & Complexities in Climate Science

[43:44]: The Problem with “Global Temperature”

• Averaging temperature worldwide obscures regional variation; most measured climate change is regional.
• Oceans, latitude, and other geographic factors matter more than global averages.

[46:31]: The Sun, Orbits, and Ice Ages

• Orbital variations (“Milankovitch cycles”) control ice ages
• Solar proxies (like carbon-14) suggest solar variability is greater than commonly acknowledged by mainstream climate science.
• "It's clear the sun is always changing." —Will Happer [49:10]

---

Suppression of Dissent and Peer Review Issues

[27:03]: Publication Roadblocks

• Papers questioning climate orthodoxy allegedly rejected or suppressed, even leading to fired editors.
• Example: The "iris effect" negative feedback from clouds.

[29:02]: The East Anglia “Climategate” Emails

• Revelation of attempts to block publication/suppress dissent in climate science.

[66:09]: Historic Precedents for Ideological Invasion

• Science’s susceptibility to ideology, with parallels drawn to the eugenics movement.
• "From the crooked timber of mankind, no straight thing was ever made." —Immanuel Kant, paraphrased by Will Happer [66:09]

---

The Role of Models and Forecasting Challenges

[83:19]: Complexity of Climate Modeling

• Climate models solve notoriously intractable equations (Navier–Stokes); chaotic, inherently unpredictable.
• "None of these models predict catastrophe… Politicians and environmentalists invent extreme descriptions that actually don't have much to do with the models." —Dick Lindzen [83:19]
• Story of Heisenberg and the mathematical difficulty of turbulence/chaos in physics.

---

Media, Social Media and Social Narratives

[41:39], [110:12]: Social and Academic Pressures

• Echo chambers created by social media, academic ostracism, and pressure not to “rock the boat.”
• "There's more uniformity in thinking in academia now..." —Joe Rogan [110:12]

---

Extreme Weather, Green Energy, and Policy Failures

[98:32], [99:53]: Extreme Weather as a Fear Tool

• Shift from temperature panic to “extreme weather” panic in the media ("it's got harder and harder to scare people with numbers").
• No hard evidence linking increased hurricanes/extreme events to CO₂—IPCC itself admits as much.

[90:27]–[91:28]: Example: Germany’s Green Energy Policy

• Nuclear and coal plants closed/blown up in a rush for wind and renewables; outcome predicted as potential economic disaster and cautionary tale for the world.
• "At some point, some country like Germany, they’ll lose all their jobs. All the industry will move. … [then] someone will realize... we've taken a wrong turn here." —Will Happer [91:09]

---

The Role of Funding in Shaping Scientific Consensus

[117:42]: The Need for Pluralism in Funding

• "Multiple sources of funding has an enormously positive effect on the vitality of science…" —Will Happer [118:11]
• Monopoly-like setups (centralized funding or rules against questioning) stifle dissent and innovation.

---

Memorable Quotes

• "Science is not a source of authority, it's a methodology. It's based on challenge." —Dick Lindzen [17:42]
• "The truth in science is whether what you predict agrees with observation." —Will Happer [34:02]
• "Often, ordinary people are more skeptical and more reasonable." —Will Happer [68:38]
• "Destroying the world is not an easy thing to do. It shouldn't be the top of your list of worries." —Dick Lindzen [132:23]

---

Timestamps of Key Segments

• 00:29: Dick Lindzen's academic background
• 02:17: Will Happer's history and the origin of his skepticism
• 05:14: Timeline: Demonization of CO₂ and the shift from cooling to warming
• 08:04: Politics and financial incentives in climate alarm
• 11:21: Stifling of climate debate and how “denier” labels stifle rational dialogue
• 17:42: Science as a challenge-based methodology, not authority
• 19:59: Role of CO₂ in making Earth greener
• 27:03: Suppression of dissenting scientific publication
• 29:02: Climategate and organized suppression at institutional levels
• 35:14: University's financial dependence on climate grants
• 41:39: Quiet, hidden academic skepticism
• 83:19–85:49: Climate modeling, complexity, chaos, and limitations
• 98:32: Shift to ‘extreme weather’ as the new fear in climate messaging
• 90:27–91:28: Germany as a green energy cautionary tale
• 117:42: The need for multiple/competing sources of funding in science

---

Notable Moments

• [27:47] — Editor allegedly fired for publishing dissenting climate paper.
• [29:02] — “Climategate”: Leaked emails and attempts to block publication.
• [35:14] — Massive university infrastructure fueled by climate grant overhead.
• [57:32] — Happer likens climate consensus to past scientific blunders (e.g., phlogiston, eugenics).
• [121:05] — Happer recounts being berated by a Nobel Laureate for inviting Lindzen to speak at Princeton.
• [125:30] — Happer’s role in adaptive optics and Star Wars missile defense, shunned by academia for being "defense-related."

---

Tone & Style

The conversation is frank, informal, and often critical of the established scientific consensus on climate change. Both Lindzen and Happer, while highly credentialed and careful in their historical and technical references, express deep skepticism about the supposed certainty of mainstream climate science and the influence of money and politics. There's a recurring motif of the dangers of consensus and politicization in science, drawing from both scientific and social history.

---

Conclusion

The episode’s central arguments focus on:

• The misuse of scientific consensus as a tool of authority.
• The dangers of political and financial interests shaping both scientific research and public perception.
• A call to return to foundational scientific values—openness to challenge, pluralism in funding, and skepticism of grand narratives driven by ideology or alarmism.

Closing Thought:
"Trust but verify. ... Destroying the world is not an easy thing to do. It shouldn't be the top of your list of worries." —Will Happer & Dick Lindzen [132:19–132:23]

---

For Listeners

This summary covers the most crucial points and notable exchanges, highlights the tone and perspective of the conversation, as well as the timestamps for those wishing to reference specific segments. For anyone seeking an alternative take on climate politics, scientific consensus, and the history of science in the modern world, this episode is insightful, provocative, and decidedly contrarian to the mainstream.

Transcript

[Dick Lindzen]

Joe Rogan Podcast. Check it out.

[Will Happer]

The Joe Rogan Experience Train my day.

[Dick Lindzen]

Joe Rogan Podcast by night, all day.

[Joe Rogan]

Gentlemen, first of all, thank you very much for being here. I really appreciate it.

[Dick Lindzen]

Pleasure.

[Joe Rogan]

My pleasure.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

And if you don't mind, would you please just tell everybody who you are.

[Joe Rogan]

And state your, your resume, like what you do. I mean, just a brief version of your credentials.

[Dick Lindzen]

I'm Dick Lindson and my whole life has been in academia. Basically. I finished my doctorate at Harvard and I did spend a couple of years at the University of Washington and in Norway and in Boulder, Colorado. Then part of that was because at Harvard I was working in atmospheric sciences, but they had no one who dealt with observations. So I went to Seattle for someone who did. And then I got my first academic position at Chicago and stayed there about three, four years, moved on to Harvard, spent about 10 years there, then to MIT for about the last 35 years until I retired in 2013. I've always enjoyed it. I mean the field of atmospheric sciences, when I entered it, I mean, the joy of it was a lot of problems that were solvable. So you could look at phenomena. One of them that I worked on was the so called quasi biennial cycle. Turns out the wind above the equator about 16 km, 20 km goes from east to west for a year, turns around, goes the other way for the next year, and so on. And you know, we worked out why that happened and there were other things like that. So it was a very enjoyable period until global warming.

[Joe Rogan]

And sir, would you tell everybody what your credentials are, what you do, where you're from.

[Will Happer]

I'm Will Happer and I'm a retired professor of physics at Princeton. And like Dick, I'm a science nerd. But I was actually born in India under the British Raj. My father was a army officer in the Indian army, Scottish. And my mother was American. And that was before World War II. So when I came to America as a small child, my mother was working in Oak Ridge for the Manhattan Project. So, wow, I remember, you know, the war days at Oak Ridge and that's probably why I went into physics. I thought this looks like interesting way to make a living and if I can do it, I'll do it. And I have, and I've done a number of things. Spent a lot of time at universities at Columbia, at Princeton. I also served for a couple years in Washington as Director of Energy Research under President Bush Sr. And I've learned a lot about climate from Dick, my colleague here. I first became suspicious when I was director of Energy Research. I would invite people in to explain how they were spending the taxpayers money. And most people were delighted to come to Washington and have some bureaucrat be interested in what they were doing. And there was one exception, that was the people working on climate. And they would always be very resentful. You know, we work for Senator Gore, we don't work for you. And so I would tell them, well, okay, let him pay for your next year's research. I can find other people who will come and talk to me who'd be glad to take my money.

[Joe Rogan]

That's interesting. So Senator Gore has been involved in this whole climate thing for quite a long time then?

[Will Happer]

Oh, yes, very long.

[Joe Rogan]

When he was a senator, before he was vice president.

[Will Happer]

That's right.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

And when he made that movie, An.

[Joe Rogan]

Inconvenient Truth, what year was that again? Jamie was like 98 or something. Yeah, something like 99.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

That.

[Joe Rogan]

What is it? Oh, really?

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

We're that off.

[Dick Lindzen]

Wow.

[Joe Rogan]

Okay, so 2006. So when he made that film, he.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

There was always.

[Joe Rogan]

When I was a child, I do remember Leonard Nimoy had a television show called In Search of. Remember that show?

[Dick Lindzen]

Sure.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

And on that show he warned of.

[Joe Rogan]

An oncoming ice age.

[Will Happer]

Right.

[Joe Rogan]

Do you remember that? And I remember being a kid and freaking out like, oh, my God, Spock is telling us the world's gonna freeze. This is terrifying. And then somewhere along the line, it became global warming. And initially in the 80s, it was kind of funny. People were saying, well, hairspray more. You use it, you could play golf deep into November.

[Dick Lindzen]

That was the ozone.

[Joe Rogan]

Yes, but it was also part of global warming.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

They were worried about global warming, but.

[Joe Rogan]

They were worried about the ozone hole. It wasn't CO2 as much back then. CO2 seems to have really significantly become a part of the zeitgeist after this Al Gore film.

[Dick Lindzen]

No, no, no, it was before.

[Joe Rogan]

No, it was a study in terms of academic study, for sure. But in terms of people panicking, when.

[Dick Lindzen]

Did CO2 look panicking? I have no idea. But no, what happened was there was. I would say with the First Earth Day, 1970, there was a real change in the environmental movement. It began to focus much more strongly on the energy sector and much less on saving the whales. And there was a big difference. I mean, the energy sector involved trillions of dollars. The whales, not so much. And at that time, it was cooling this global mean temperature, which doesn't change much, but, you know, you focus on one degree, a half degree. So it looks like something. And it was cooling from the 1930s, 1930s were very warm and it was getting cooler until the 70s. And that's why they were saying, well, you know, this is going to lead to an ice age. And they focused on that for a while. And then in the 70s and at that time, well, what do you say, you know, if you're worried about an ice age? They said, well, it'll be the sulfates emitted by coal burning because that reflects light and the less light that we get, the colder we'll get. But then the temperature stopped cooling in the 70s and started warming. And that's when they said, well, you have to warm now. Scare people with warming, and you can't use the sulfates anymore. But the scientist called Suki Manabe showed that even though CO2 doesn't do much in the way of warming, doubling it will only give you a half degree or so. But if you assumed that relative humidity stayed constant so that every time you warmed a little, you added water vapor, which is a much more important greenhouse gas, you had doubled the impact of CO2, which now gives you a degree, which still isn't a heck of a lot. But still it was saying you could increase it. And that's when people started saying, well, now we better find CO2. It's increased because of industrialization and so on. That began the demonization of CO2.

[Joe Rogan]

Do you think there's just always people that are going to point to anything like this that's difficult to define and use it to their advantage?

[Dick Lindzen]

Oh, yeah. And this was a particular case you wanted to deal, you know, the energy sector is trillions of dollars. Anything you can do to overturn it, change it, replace fossil fuels, big bucks. And one of the odd things I think in politics, I don't see it studied much. Congress can actually give away trillions of dollars. If you look at the McKinsey report on, you know, eliminating CO2, net zero, they're saying it'll cost hundreds of trillions of dollars. Well, if you're giving out that much, you don't need that much of your politician. All you need is millions for your campaigning. And all you're asking are the recipients of people who are getting the money that you are giving them a half percent, a quarter percent, you're golden. So that's much better than giving out 100,000 and having all of this episode.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

Is brought to you by the farmer's dog.

[Joe Rogan]

I think we can all agree that.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

Eating highly processed food for every meal isn't optimal. So why is processed food the status quo for dog food? Because that's what kibble is an ultra processed food, but a healthy alternative exists. The farmer's dog. They make fresh food for dogs and what does it look like? Real meat and vegetables that are gently cooked to retain vital nutrients and help avoid any of the bad stuff that comes with ultra processing. And it's not just random ingredients thrown together. Their food is formulated by on staff board certified vet nutritionists. These people are experts on dog nutrition and they're all in on fresh food. The farmer's dog also does something unique. They portion out the food to your dog's nutritional needs. This ensures that you don't overfeed them, making weight management easy. Research shows that dogs kept at a healthy weight can live up to two and a half years longer. Head to the farmersdog.com rogan to get 50% off your first box plus free shipping. This offer is for new customers only.

Coaches on the sidelines dripping in sweat, hoping they called the right plays. But you're not sweating. Thanks to DraftKings, they're hooking up new customers with a no sweat bet up to $100. It's easier than calling plays in a sold out stadium. Just place any bet. If it doesn't hit, we'll give you a bonus bet back in the amount of your initial bet up to $100. Download the DraftKings sportsbook app. New customers use promo code Rogan to get a no swe bet. That's promo code ROGAN only on DraftKings sportsbook. The crown is yours. Visit opgr.org or call 1-877-My limit to talk, text or chat about your own or someone else's. Gambling resources are free. Must be 21 and over. And in Oregon to place wagers, eligibility restrictions apply. No sweat bonus bet issued in amount of first losing bet maximum $100. Non withdrawable bonus bets expire 7 days after issuance. For additional terms and responsible gaming resources, see sportsbook.draftkings.com promos well, the key though.

[Joe Rogan]

Is also making it a subject that you cannot challenge. There's no room for any rational debate. And if you discuss it at all, you are now a climate change denier. Yeah, which is like being an anti vaxxer or you know, fill in the blank with whatever other horrible thing you could be called.

[Dick Lindzen]

Now that's a very interesting phenomenon. I mean I was looking at it. On the one hand, you're told the science is settled. Thousands of the world's leading climate scientists all agree. Which often makes you wonder. I mean you went to college. How many climate Scientists did, you know, I mean. But on the other hand, if you read the IPCC reports, they're pointing out, for instance, that water vapor and clouds are much bigger than CO2 and we don't understand them at all. So here you have the biggest phenomena we don't understand at all. But the science is settled. Who knows what that means?

[Joe Rogan]

Well, it's also. This is a very bizarre dynamic of the Earth's temperature itself, which has never been static.

[Dick Lindzen]

No. How would it remain static? That would involve a hugely reactive system.

[Joe Rogan]

Doesn't make any sense. But everyone seems to be buying this narrative that the science is settled and.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

The Earth is warming. We have to act now.

[Dick Lindzen]

You say everyone.

[Joe Rogan]

I'm not sure. No, I'll say everyone.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

A lot of politicians.

[Dick Lindzen]

A lot of politicians are very attractive to this because it gives them power.

[Joe Rogan]

Right. And it's hard to define. You can argue. And if you argue against it, you're a bad person.

[Dick Lindzen]

Well, you do all that, but, you know, we spend part of a year in France, my wife is French. You know, the ordinary people, once you get to the countryside, don't take this all that seriously.

[Joe Rogan]

Right.

[Dick Lindzen]

Here too. I suspect ordinary people have more skepticism than many people who are more educated.

[Joe Rogan]

Yes, but unfortunately these ordinary people sometimes are impacted by these politicians decisions where they have to look. In the uk, they were getting rid of cows, they were forcing people to kill cows.

[Dick Lindzen]

They were paying three times more for their heating and their electric bills. I mean, it makes people poorer. It's making it almost impossible to electrify parts of the world that need it. And that involves billions of people. No, I mean, it's doing phenomenal damage and pain. But, you know, I think for politicians and for many people who are well.

[Will Happer]

Off.

[Dick Lindzen]

They need something that gives meaning to their life. And saving the planet seems sufficiently grandiose, but they're ambitious.

[Joe Rogan]

How are these net zero policies stopping people from getting electricity?

[Dick Lindzen]

Well, by making it expensive. By eliminating fossil fuels. Fossil fuels are cheaper. At least the experience in the UK is when you switch to, quote, renewables, it tripled the price of electricity.

[Joe Rogan]

Right. But what I'm talking about is like third world countries, parts of the world that are undeveloped, they can't afford it. And that's all it is, they can't afford it. And. But they also to. If they didn't follow these net zero policies. What kind of plants are we talking about? We talking about coal plants?

[Dick Lindzen]

Coal, anything. Whatever is available.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah, I mean, you know, even though coal does pollute the environment and releases particulates. Right.

[Dick Lindzen]

It's not an issue.

[Will Happer]

Right.

[Dick Lindzen]

How shall I put it? You know, it's always a matter of cost. We have a plant, I think, in Alabama that has basically as clean as any other plant that burns coal. You can clean it, you can scrub it, you can get rid of almost everything except CO2.

[Joe Rogan]

Okay. So the particulates aren't as big of an issue as they used to be in the past.

[Will Happer]

I agree.

[Joe Rogan]

They're more efficient. Okay.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

So stopping.

[Joe Rogan]

So this net zero thing is stopping them from installing modernized coal plants in parts of the world that do not have electricity. And the overall net negative weighs much heavier in not bringing these coal plants?

[Dick Lindzen]

I think so.

[Joe Rogan]

And not bringing these people into the first world. Yeah.

[Dick Lindzen]

And there are, of course, the alternative natural gas and so on, which are available in places, you know, there are places where you have. You're lucky, like in Norway or Canada, you know, Quebec, where you have hydro, which is intrinsically clean. But there's a problem with politicians. I remember once being in D.C. and some Republican politicians came and said, you know what we just did? We banned incandescent light bulbs. They said, wasn't that a great thing? I said, that's the stupidest thing I've heard today. What's the point? Because at the time, what was replacing it? Compact fluorescents, which were awful. All they had to do was wait and do nothing. And LEDs would come along and people would say, okay, I prefer that. Instead, they feel they have to do.

[Joe Rogan]

Something and they would switch the fluorescents, which turned out to be terrible for people. Yeah. So incandescents aren't bad for you.

[Dick Lindzen]

They were simply less efficient than the, you know, in terms of the number of watts of heat they generate versus light. I mean, LEDs are phenomenal that way.

[Joe Rogan]

Right? They're the best. Yeah. Well, you know, it's interesting when they have these decisions that they make like that, that do turn out to be negative ultimately, and that yet people still allow them to make silly decisions that don't seem to be making sense.

[Will Happer]

Yeah.

[Dick Lindzen]

I think there's an old cliche, money is the root of all evil.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah, that's what I was going to get to. This is the disturbing thing that I think a lot of people have a hard time accepting, especially a lot of very polite, educated people that have followed the narrative that you follow if you're a good person and if you're a person who trusts science. And that is that, like, we have a serious problem, we have to address it now, or there will be no America for our grandchildren. So this is the thing that we keep doing.

[Dick Lindzen]

You mentioned a tough thing there, business trust science.

[Joe Rogan]

Yes.

[Dick Lindzen]

It's not a great idea because that isn't. Science is not a source of authority, it's a methodology. It's based on challenge.

[Joe Rogan]

Right. Where'd this narrative come from then? Trust the science.

[Dick Lindzen]

The success of science. In other words, this is a relatively new way to approach the world. I mean, a few hundred years, and the notion is, and I think it's been stated many times, you test things and if they fail to predict correctly, they're wrong. So you find out what's wrong with them. You don't fudge them, you don't change the rules. It's led to immense improvements in life development of all sorts of things. And so it has a good reputation. Politicians have less of a reputation, so they wish to co opt the reputation of science.

[Joe Rogan]

Yes, that's a very good point because try finding a good politician that everybody agrees is rock solid. You can find plenty of science that everybody thinks is amazing. Cell phone technology, nuclear power, so many things that people go, that's incredible that they did that.

[Dick Lindzen]

Well, that's also confusing technology with science.

[Joe Rogan]

Right, the result of science. Yeah, right, absolutely, yeah. Which is also an issue.

[Dick Lindzen]

Right.

[Joe Rogan]

And when you can get politicians to attach themselves to narratives that are supposedly connected to science.

[Dick Lindzen]

You mentioned Gore at the beginning, you know, with that thing he was showing this cycle of ice ages and CO and temperature going together. And it never bothered him that the temperature changed first and then the CO2.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah. Greg Braden was on the podcast recently. He was explaining there have been times where the CO2 was much higher in the atmosphere, but the temperature was colder.

[Dick Lindzen]

Oh, yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

So it's not like we can point to, like, look at the dinosaurs. We don't want to live the way the dinosaurs lived. Look at how much CO2 they had, like. And then the other really inconvenient thing with CO2 is that the earth is actually greener than it has been in a long time.

[Dick Lindzen]

I mean, I think we'll speak to that. But I mean, essentially the increased amount of CO2 in the industrial era has added greatly to the arable land. And in fact, there's a funny story. Do you know the name E.O. wilson? Have you ever heard that name?

[Joe Rogan]

I do, I have heard it, but I don't know where.

[Dick Lindzen]

He was a biologist at Harvard. He wrote about sociobiology. His specialty were ants and bees and things, social insects. And he was giving a talk and it came up for reasons that were not obvious to me. He was Talking about the population of humanoids. And he was mentioning that you go back a few hundred thousand years and you began the first humanoids and they got to about a few million. But then during the last glacial maximum, the numbers went down to tens of thousands. There was a complete wipeout of humans. So I asked him afterwards, I said, do you think this could have anything to do with the fact that CO2 is so low that there was no food? And his response was to turn around and walk away.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

That's an inconvenient truth, sir.

[Joe Rogan]

It's just to me, it's very strange to see an almost unanimous acceptance of that. We have settled this. That's the science is settled from so many people and both the left and in academia and even on the right. There's a lot of people on the right that believe that.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah, I know. And it should be the first thing that makes you suspicious.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah, Right. There's a consensus.

[Will Happer]

Yeah.

[Dick Lindzen]

I mean, this is not how science is done.

[Joe Rogan]

Something that's never static.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

This episode is brought to you by Happy Dad. Hard seltzer. A nice cold Happy dad is low carbonation, gluten free and easy to drink. No bloating, no nonsense. Whether you're watching a football game or you're golfing, watching a fight with your boys or out on the lake, these moments call for a cold Happy Dad. People are drinking all these seltzers and skinny cans loaded with sugar. But Happy dad only has one gram of sugar in a normal size.

[Dick Lindzen]

Can.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

Can't decide on a flavor. Grab the variety pack. Lemon, lime, watermelon, pineapple and wild cherry. They also have a grape flavor. In collaboration with Death Row Records and Snoop Dogg, they have their new lemonade coming out as well, Happy dad. Available nationwide across America and in Canada. Go to your local liquor store or visit happydad.com for a limited time. Use the code Rogan to buy one Happy dad trucker hat and get one free. Enjoy a cold Happy dad must be of legal drinking age. Please drink responsibly. Happy dad Hard Seltzer Tea and Lemonade is a malt alcohol located in Orange County, California.

[Joe Rogan]

You know, the weirdest thing is when you look at the charts of the overall temperature of Earth that have been, you know, from core samples over a long period of time.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

It's this crazy wave and like, no.

[Joe Rogan]

One was controlling it back then. We're supposed to believe that we can control it now, that we can do something about it.

[Dick Lindzen]

But there's something else about it which I find funny. And you might have some Insight into people pay no attention to the actual numbers. Yeah, I mean, we're not talking about big changes. You know, in other words, you know, for the temperature of the globe as a whole between now and the last glacial maximum, the difference was 5 degrees. But that was because most of the earth was not affected much of the earth anyway, very much. But you know, somebody says one degree, a half degree, what's his name, Gutierrez at the UN says the next half degree and we're done for. I mean, doesn't anyone ask a half degree? I mean, I deal with that between, you know, 9:00am and 10:00am it does seem crazy.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

It's just that kind of fear of.

[Joe Rogan]

Minute change that they try to put into people. And what I think people need to understand that are casual observers of this is what you discussed earlier. How much money is involved in getting people to buy into this narrative. So you can pass some bill that's called Save the world Climate, some crazy like that where it goes along.

[Dick Lindzen]

They call it the Inflation Reduction Act.

[Will Happer]

Even better.

[Joe Rogan]

Who doesn't want to reduce inflation? And then next thing you know, there's windmills killing whales and all kinds of nonsense. But the point being, it's it. It is a fascinating science. Like the science itself is fascinating.

[Dick Lindzen]

Oh yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

You get rid of the ideology and you stop attaching this thing versus, you know, you're either pro science or anti science. Just look at the actual data of it. It's absolutely fascinating. And these minute changes, the fact that the procession of the equinoxes or the earth wobbles like the whole thing is nuts. Like the whole temperature and it has relatively stable in order to keep us alive in terms of it can't go.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

Too low, can't go too high.

[Joe Rogan]

We're in this Goldilocks zone.

[Dick Lindzen]

The interesting thing is during the ice ages, we almost get wiped out.

[Joe Rogan]

Got really close. Right.

[Dick Lindzen]

And what's interesting about that is as far as temperature goes, okay, yeah, the poles have gotten much colder. You have ice covering Illinois, 2 kilometers of ice, that's uninhabitable. But you get south of 30 degrees latitude, not very different from today in terms of temperature. And so you would think at 100,000 years people would sort of migrate to an area where it was now pleasant. Trouble was, without CO2, which went down to about 180, there wasn't enough food for the people.

[Joe Rogan]

Oh, so there wasn't enough plant life.

[Will Happer]

Yeah, yeah.

[Dick Lindzen]

Get down to 160, 150, all life would die. There would be not enough food for anything.

[Joe Rogan]

What's it at now, like 240?

[Dick Lindzen]

No, we're now 450.

[Joe Rogan]

400?

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah, 450.

[Will Happer]

430. Maybe today, yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

Okay. When you first started discussing this and when you first started getting interested in this, how much pushback did you get?

[Dick Lindzen]

Interesting question. Actually, quite a lot. But I mean, it took very funny forms. So, for instance, in, let's see, 1989, for instance, I sent a paper to Science magazine questioning whether this is something to worry about. And they sent it back immediately saying there was no interest. So I sent it to the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, and they reviewed it and published it, and the editor was immediately fired.

[Joe Rogan]

Wow.

[Dick Lindzen]

About 10 years later, working with some colleagues at NASA, we found something called the iris effect, that clouds, which were greenhouse effect at the upper levels, contracted when it got warm, letting more heat out, so cooling as a negative feedback. And we got the paper put, it got reviewed, was published again, the editor was fired immediately. But the new editor came on immediately and said he's inviting papers to criticize it. And suddenly there were tons of papers criticizing it, looking for anything that differed from what we did, including one that found a difference that actually made the CO2 even less important, but it was different. So he thought he could pass it through it. No, it's insane. And even now there's something called gatekeepers. I don't know. Are you familiar with the release of emails from East Anglia?

[Joe Rogan]

No, I'm not.

[Dick Lindzen]

Okay. This is 20 years ago or something, almost. Somebody, anonymous, released the emails from a place in England, the University of East Anglia, which has a lot of people pushing climate alarm. And they were communicating with other people like Michael Mann and so on, and they were talking about blocking publication and getting rid of editors and doing this and doing that and so on. And that was all public and it had no impact at all.

[Joe Rogan]

That sounds like that should be illegal.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah, well, you know, the whole business with, how shall I put it, Peer review, It is not ancient. Before World War II, very few journals had peer review. And in fact, when I have students look at old journals from the 19th century, one of the big surprises is they are less formal than today's papers. They are literally discussions among scientists about their results, their questions, their uncertainties and so on. Real communication today, I mean, there's much more formality in the papers. There's also in my field, the Meteorological Society actually did a poll or a study. How often are papers referred to? It turns out the average paper is referred to once. I mean, so you have these things. Papers are written to satisfy the funding agency. Nobody seems to pay attention to them.

[Joe Rogan]

How did you get involved in this?

[Will Happer]

Well, I mentioned my stay at the Department of Energy and that's what really sucked me into it. I had never paid much attention to climate science before, but I was spending a lot of money, the taxpayers money on it and so I thought I ought to learn a little bit about it. And I already mentioned that most of the climate scientists did not appreciate my questioning. They were very strange because almost any other science. When they got a call from Washington, come in and tell us what you're doing, they were just delighted to come and make a case about how important their work was. But the climate scientists were completely different.

[Joe Rogan]

Did anybody engage with you?

[Will Happer]

Yeah, they had to because I threatened to cut off their funding if they didn't come. And so they would come, you know, and be very sullen and they wouldn't answer questions. And you know, you can't have a seminar without asking questions. That's how you learn.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

So they would come to try to.

[Joe Rogan]

Get funding from you and they wouldn't answer questions?

[Will Happer]

That's right.

[Joe Rogan]

That sounds crazy. That sounds like people that don't think they have to convince you that what they're doing is important so they're entitled to that money.

[Will Happer]

Well, that's right. Well, you know, I was working for President Bush Sr. And when Carter and Gore election, you know, Gore couldn't wait to fire me, you know, at the behest of all of his proteges.

[Joe Rogan]

You mean Clinton and Gore?

[Will Happer]

Clinton and Gore, yeah, that's right. So he, you know, Washington, fortunately, it's very hard to make anything happen, including firing someone you want to fire because you can't find them in the org chart. So it took him two or three months to find me. But they finally did fire me. I was glad to be fired. I wanted to go back to do research. I was tired of being a bureaucrat. So I, you know, grateful in some sense.

[Joe Rogan]

Now, your colleagues that you that weren't working with you like other scientists.

[Will Happer]

Yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

Were they reluctant to discuss this kind of information with you guys when you first started questioning whether or not this narrative is correct?

[Will Happer]

Well, you know, my field is actually hard physics. You know, I'm a nuclear physics trained and done a lot of work with lasers and these are things you can measure. They don't have much political influence. A lot of them have a military significance. In fact, the reason I was brought to Washington is because I invented an important part of the Star wars defense initiative which I can say about later. But I had never really paid any close attention to science until then, but I was climate science. Climate science, I should say. Yes. So once I had this experience in Washington, I started looking to it a little bit, but I didn't have time to look a lot because my own research was going still at Princeton, and we had discovered some things that we were able to form a little startup company. And so forming the company and getting it going and funded used up most of my time. I didn't have time to look at climate. But eventually that was behind me and I invited Dick to come give a seminar at a colloquium at Princeton. And that's really when I began to get very interested in it. And I realized that it's just completely different from normal science, you know, it completely politicized. If you can't ask a question, you know, that's a bad, bad sign. And. And if you have 100% consensus determining the truth, that's an even worse sign because, you know, the truth in science is whether what you predict agrees with observation. And that wasn't true of the science, the climate science community. You know, they would predict all these things and none of them ever happened. And there was no consequence, you know, one failure after another, and nothing ever happened. The funding kept pouring in.

[Joe Rogan]

Now, is this behind the scenes? Is this discussed amongst physicists and other hard scientists? Do they talk about how climate science has been politicized and the issue that that causes, or do they just accept it?

[Will Happer]

Well, I think for the most part, speaking as a physicist, I don't know how it is in other fields. And from Princeton, I think most of my colleagues recognize that there's a lot of nonsense there, but they're afraid to speak up because it's bringing in enormous amounts of money. Dick mentioned that the love of money is the root of all evil. And in universities, for example, at Princeton, we have enormous new building program. It's funded to a large extent from overhead from climate grants, you know, and you're talking about, you know, not small change, you know, you're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars, you know, for construction. So it's like, you know, this famous drama of this Norwegian playwright, Enemy of the People, Ibsen. And the point of the drama was there was this resort town in Norway where you would come and you would be treated at the spa. You drink the water and go home healthy. Well, people would come and drink the water and they would die of typhoid. A local doctor said, you know, we're killing people. We're not curing. Them. And he was declared an enemy of the people because he was cut, cutting off the source of funding for the city. So it's that syndrome. It's an ancient human problem. So it's always been there and it's there in spades with climate.

[Dick Lindzen]

It's part of it. Another part of it is the politicization has made it a partisan issue. I mean, in the US And I think that's in a way fortunate. It's almost a right versus left issue. And as a result, you have people, universities are almost entirely on the left. And so it's something they support. You know, the money end of it is sort of funny. I mean, I have the feeling at MIT that our president, Sally Kornbluth, you know, probably spends her time worrying about how she can use climate money to support the music department. I don't know.

[Joe Rogan]

So when they get funding for climate, they can allocate it as they wish.

[Dick Lindzen]

Well, you know, it is fungible.

[Joe Rogan]

Okay.

[Will Happer]

You get this huge overhead, you know, 50%, 60% of your grant goes to the administration and not to your research. Yeah. They can do what they like with the organization. Yeah.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

This episode is brought to you by ZipRecruiter. You don't think about it too much, but the holiday season comes with some pretty unique jobs like a haunted houseworker, a professional pumpkin carver, gift wrapper elf, or real bearded Santas. And all these jobs require a unique set of skills. If you need to hire for a role like that, or any role, really, ZipRecruiter is the way to go, especially since you can try it for [e-mail] Rogan Whatever you're looking for, ZipRecruiter can help you find the perfect match. And it works fast. You'll be able to find out if there are any people in your area who are qualified for your role right away. You'll also have access to their advanced resume database, which helps you connect with top candidates sooner. Let ZipRecruiter find the right people for your roles, seasonal or otherwise. Four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the first day. And right now you could try it for [e-mail] Rogan Again, that's ziprecruiter.com Rogan ZipRecruiter the smartest way to hire.

[Joe Rogan]

And if they take a step outside of the narrative and say, I think we need to re examine what's going on with CO2 in the atmosphere and it seems There's a politicalization of this subject, and that's bad for science, that's bad for education, it's bad for everything. Let's take a step back. They would immediately lose so much fun.

[Will Happer]

Well, the main thing it's bad for is for overhead income to the university.

[Joe Rogan]

Exactly, exactly.

[Will Happer]

Some of the administrators, by the way.

[Dick Lindzen]

I mean, this is something that the press didn't deal with very much. Trump was cutting the overhead. He was saying that he didn't want to have that included in grants. I don't think the public realized how significant that was. For better or for worse.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah. I think most people have no idea where grants go. They don't even think about it.

[Dick Lindzen]

No, I mean, the amount of money that's involved. Yeah. When I was active, if I got a grant, I'm a theoretician, so I didn't need laboratory work. It mainly was for support of students, but then 50% of it went to the administration.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah. It's like a lot of charities, almost.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

A lot of money goes to overhead. A lot of money goes to executives. A lot of money goes to the administration on grants.

[Dick Lindzen]

And some of it is reasonable.

[Joe Rogan]

Sure. But it's also. You're kind of attached to keeping that money flowing in, and there's a gigantic incentive to not rock the boat and not discuss it the same way you would discuss nuclear science.

[Dick Lindzen]

Oh, yeah. And the attraction, I mean, if you're an administrator, if you're a president of a university, that often overrides everything else, you know, that you're raising money. I remember years ago, I started college at Rensselaer, and I made the mistake of mentioning to someone that I appreciated the fact they never bothered me. I transferred out after my sophomore year. So it began bothering me, and I realized the president of Rensselaer was making over a million and a half dollars. This is years ago, probably making much more now. And the fundraiser came back to me and said, do you know how much money she raises? And I said, oh, so she's on commission.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

Right?

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah. That is kind of what's going on.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

It gets real weird when you bring.

[Joe Rogan]

That kind of stuff up, and people get very reluctant to have these discussions. They don't want to rock the boat. I've talked to a lot of friends in academia, and they say people pull you aside, like in quiet corners, to discuss how this is kind of bullshit.

[Dick Lindzen]

But there's also the alumni. I find this with Harvard, especially, a lot of the people who graduate from Harvard really love the place, for better or for worse. And they will do anything to protect it.

[Joe Rogan]

That makes sense.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

Especially since to stick your neck out there's not a whole lot of benefit unless you're writing a book about how ridiculous current climate change models are.

[Dick Lindzen]

A lot of people did at first. A lot of politicians wrote books saying this is a hoax. And they managed to ride that out. I mean, by just keeping on demanding that it be accepted. It's interesting.

[Joe Rogan]

It is interesting. It's because it's universally accepted on the left. Any discussion at all? I've had conversations with people and I say, why do you think that? Like, what do you know about climate change? And almost none of them have any idea what the actual predictions are, how wrong they've been. What Al Gore predicted in this stupid movie which is so far off he thought we were all going to be dead. Today, there's very little change between 2006 and today.

[Dick Lindzen]

As I mentioned before, I think for some people its importance is it gives, quote, meaning to their life.

[Joe Rogan]

Yes. It becomes a part of an ideology and it's very cult like ideology that encompasses a lot of different things, unfortunately.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

What do you think are the major.

[Joe Rogan]

Factors you talked about? Water vapor, CO2, there's methane. There's a lot of different factors that would lead to the temperature of the earth moving in any direction. Correct?

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah, let me back off that a little because one of the things that is sort of strange is the narrative itself deals with global temperature. Not clear what that is. I mean, some average over the whole globe, how do you take it, what do you do with it? But more than that, what is climate? And you know, there is a definition, it's an arbitrary definition and it's that it's time variation on time scales longer than 30 years. It's pretty arbitrary, but it distinguishes it from weather which changes from day to day or week to week, et cetera.

[Joe Rogan]

Right. So if they can see a rise in temperature over 30 years, they start.

[Dick Lindzen]

Getting concerned, they start calling it climate. Okay? Now you can take data from every station and filter it to get rid of everything shorter than 30 years. That's called a low pass filter. And you can look at that and each station and see how does it correlate with the globe. It turns out very poorly because most climate change by that definition is regional. So for instance, in this area, let's say the states like Louisiana, Alabama, Gulf states, they had a period of cooling when the rest of the country was warming. Nobody paid much attention to it because that's normal. Different areas do different things. You have reasons why it's local. I mean, if you're near a coast, near a body of water, the circulations in the ocean are bringing heat to the surface and away from the surface all the time on time scales ranging from a few years for El Nino ENSO to a thousand years. And so this has nothing to do with the global average. The whole business that the global average is at issue was something that was created for people studying different planets. And so you'd look at the average for each planet, and that varied quite a lot. So that was useful. But for looking at the Earth's climate, I'm not sure a global mean is a particularly useful device that makes sense.

[Joe Rogan]

How much of a factor does the sun play? Obviously, a lot. It heats us up. But like the changing, you know, that's.

[Dick Lindzen]

Something there's argument about. I think, you know, for instance, a man called Milankovitch around 1940 made a convincing argument, and I think now it's correct, that orbital variations created a change in insolation, incoming sunlight in the Arctic in summer, and that controlled the ice ages. And the thinking was pretty simple. He was saying that every winter is cold, every winter has snow. But what the temperature or the insulation or the sunlight in the summer is determines whether that snow melts or not before the next cycle. And if you're at a point where it doesn't melt, you build a glacier. Takes thousands of years, but, you know, eventually it's big. And in recent years, for instance, there have been young people who have shown that that works. It's interesting. There was even a national program called CLIMAP to study this around 1990 or so, and they found something peculiar. They found that there were peaks in the orbital variables that were found in the data for ice volume, but that the time series were not lining up right. The young people looking at this said, you're looking at the wrong thing. If you're looking at the insolation, you want to look at the time rate of change of ice volume. Volume, not just the ice volume. And then the correlations were excellent. So this was a theory, Milankovitch, that I think has been reasonably sustained.

[Will Happer]

But.

[Dick Lindzen]

The people doing this got no credit, nothing. Because, you know, early in my career, these people would have been rewarded. Now, it didn't contribute to global warming. Nobody pays attention to it.

[Will Happer]

Joe, let me add to what Dick has said, which I agree with, but you asked about the sun, and as Dick says, that is a controversial issue. The establishment narrative is that the sun has very little to do with it. It's all CO2 CO2 is the control knob. Don't confuse me with other possibilities. But nobody is quite sure about the sun. We have not got good records of the sun for a long time. So we're stuck with proxies of how bright was the sun 500 years ago or 5,000 years ago. And one of the proxies is when the sun activity changes, it changes the amount of radioactive isotopes that it makes in the atmosphere, things like carbon 14 or beryllium 10. These stick around for long, you know, thousands of years or longer. And you can from that infer how many of them were made 500 years ago or 5,000 years ago. And they don't give any support to the idea that the sun has been constant. It's very clear, for example, that the amount of carbon 14, you know, this radioactivity that's produced changes from year to year. If you don't take that into account, you get all the dates wrong from carbon 14 dating, you know, where you take an Egyptian mummy and you burn up the cloth and you measure the carbon 14 in it and you get the wrong answer. Unless you assume that the rate of production then was different from what it is today. Because you know what the right answer is from the Egyptian mummies. There's a pretty good historical record of that. So it's clear the sun is always changing. And over the last 10,000 years, since the last glacial maximum, there have been many warmings and coolings, very large warmings and coolings, and that's particularly noticeable near the Arctic in high latitudes. In the north, for example, my father's home in Scotland, I was a kid, I would walk up into the hill south of Edinburgh and you could see these farms from the year 1000, where people were able to make a crop at altitudes where you can't farm today. It's too cold today, but it was clearly warm enough in the year 1000, which was the time when the Norse farmed Greenland. So what caused those? It was not people burning oil and coal, you know. And so I think the best guess as to what it was, it's some slight difference in the way the sun was shining in those days, because they do correlate with the carbon 14.

[Joe Rogan]

That's absolutely fascinating. Now, when we have estimates, like, say, of the Jurassic or any dinosaur age, is there enough of an understanding of the differences in temperatures back then that we know whether or not they ever experienced ice ages?

[Will Happer]

Oh, yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

So we can go back 65, 100 million years.

[Will Happer]

You can go 500 million years, 5 million.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

This episode is brought to you by Tommy John Underwear. I really like these underwear. They fit perfect and the premium fabrics really make all the difference. We all know fall can get crazy busy, but you need a base layer.

[Joe Rogan]

That goes above and beyond.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

With up to four times more stretch than competing brands and breathable fabrics, Tommy John Underwear solves the problem that every guy faces. There's no more chafe, wedging or riding up, just softness in support right where you need it. They look clutch and with tons of colors and prints to choose from, you can find the perfect pair for you. And don't forget your first purchase is backed by Tommy John's risk free guarantee. So in the rare instance that you don't love it, you'll get your money back. Look, with 30 million pairs sold, there are thousands of other guys wearing Tommy John right now that are way more comfortable than you. Don't settle for less. I wear Tommy John and you should too. Upgrade your underwear this fall. Go to tommyjohn.com rogan for 25% off your first that's tommyjohn.com rogan when something truly works for you, you want people.

[Joe Rogan]

To know about it.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

AG1 next gen is your daily healthy drink. Just one scoop combines your multivitamin, pre and probiotics, superfoods and antioxidants into one truly simple, delicious habit. I partnered with AG1 for so long because they're committed to constantly improving and their latest clinically studied formula features more vitamins and minerals for more comprehensive support while still maximiz absorption in the body. And I know I've talked about AG1 for a long time, but if you haven't checked it out in a while, now's the time. AG1 has a lot going on, including new flavors berry, citrus and tropical that'll make showing up for your health even better. You can be an athlete, you could be a gym rat. You just be a normal person and AG1 is going to help you feel your best. When you subscribe today, you'll get a free bottle of AG D3K2 and five AG1 travel packs with your first subscription order. Go to drinkag1. That's drinkag1.com jre check it out.

[Will Happer]

100 million years and be pretty evidence of ice Ages? Absolutely. They've come and gone.

[Joe Rogan]

There always been, there's always been an.

[Will Happer]

Ice age and a warming and they don't correlate very well with CO2. You can also estimate the past CO2 levels and they don't correlate with ice ages.

[Dick Lindzen]

What's special about the recent ice ages is they're pretty periodic. So for 700,000 years, almost every hundred thousand years you have a cycle. If you go back further than that, you begin seeing that fall apart. And for about 3 million years, 40,000 years is the dominant period. And then you go back further than that and you don't have ice ages for a long time.

[Will Happer]

Wow. Yeah, it's very poorly understood, I would say.

[Joe Rogan]

And there's also no way to track it. Like there's no way to tell what's going to happen to the sun. They have some sort of an understanding, increased activity.

[Dick Lindzen]

Well, it's not clear that solar activity was the issue.

[Joe Rogan]

Could have been many factors.

[Dick Lindzen]

Well, you know, how should I put it with the ice ages? As I say, orbital theory was the main thing. The fact that you have various factors determining the orbit of the Earth versus the sun and so on give you periodic changes in the incoming radiation as a function of geography in the Earth.

[Will Happer]

Joe, let me add again to what Dick has said, that he correctly said that the current ice ages, which are quasi periodic, really only began 3 million years or so ago. And at first they were oscillating a lot faster than today. And that was approximately the time that the Isthmus of Panama closed. So one of the suspicions is that when the Panama isthmus closed and stopped the circulation of water from the Atlantic to the Pacific, that made a huge difference in the transport of heat in things like the Gulf Stream, for example. The Gulf Stream would have been completely different in if water could have flown into the Pacific instead of to North Europe. And that was about the time that these fluctuating ice ages began.

[Joe Rogan]

Wow.

[Will Happer]

But, you know, we've set back the serious study of climate, I think, by 50 years by this manic focus on CO2. If your theory doesn't have CO2 in it, forget it, you know, you won't get funding. And so the true answer, I mean, to me, you know, there was a period 200 years ago when everyone thought that heat was phlogiston. There was this magic subject, you know, non existent, but everyone had to believe in plagiastan. And it turned out it was nonsense, it wasn't there at all. But, but you couldn't get anyone to support you unless you believed in plagiaristian. So I call this phlogiston era of climate science where plagiastan is CO2, you know.

[Joe Rogan]

Well, this is what confused me. You gentlemen are academics, you're obviously very intelligent people. There's other very intelligent people that are involved in academia. How does this problem get solved? Like, how do they start treating this as what it is instead of attaching it to a political stance?

[Will Happer]

Well, I think stopping the funding for this massive funding for climate would help because it's certainly been driven within academia by the availability of funds. If you're willing to support the narrative, you will be handsomely rewarded and you'll be elected to societies, you'll win prizes.

[Joe Rogan]

And you'll be shunned again if you don't.

[Will Happer]

That's right. So I think, for example, if some administration in Washington wants to slow this down and get some sanity, they should cut the funding or they should at least open up the funding to alternate theories of what is controlling climate. Because the theory that the control knob is CO2 doesn't work. It's completely clear it doesn't work.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

And it just seems so insane that.

[Joe Rogan]

If we move in the same direction and we, as you say, if it does, if it really is holding back climate science by 50 years, like that's a travesty.

[Will Happer]

Well, you know, Dick would have made a lot more progress and his colleagues would have made a lot more progress if they hadn't been forced to deal with this CO2 cult. And we might understand climate today without that.

[Dick Lindzen]

No. There are a lot of things that are peculiar about science in general. You know, one of them is numbers. I mean, it isn't having more people work on something. You want to have an environment where there's freedom. Often think. I mean, Will is familiar with this. There's a photograph from 1929 of all the world's physicists at a salvay conference. This is a golden age of physics. If you quintupled the number of people working on physics, would you have improved the situation? I doubt it. And so, you know, I think freedom is much more important than just piling on.

[Joe Rogan]

There's the photo.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah, you have that. Great.

[Will Happer]

There they are.

[Dick Lindzen]

Not quite.

[Will Happer]

It's not the same, but that's a Solway conference. Absolutely.

[Dick Lindzen]

Now, the 1929 had the Curies.

[Will Happer]

Well, Pierre might be there.

[Joe Rogan]

It's okay either way.

[Dick Lindzen]

I guess we can. Yeah. But I mean, I wondered at times, you know, when you had the Soviet competition with the U.S. and they were the first ones into space, and we suddenly began a program to get more and more kids to get into stem. That has its downside. First of all, you're going to dilute the field if you increase it too much. And the second thing is with peer review, I mean, peer review is new. I mean, it wasn't that common before World War II, but people have pointed out it has its virtues. But you know, you can see the Royal Meteorological Society, for instance, used to give you instructions. And the instructions were you can only reject a paper if there is a mathematical error that you can identify or if it's plagiarized, it's repeating something that already exists. And that was pretty fair because how is a reviewer supposed to decide if a new theory is right or not or so on? That's asking too much of that. But today peer review is almost a process to enforce conformity. If you're not going with the flow, you can get rejected. And that's a lot of things structurally need to be, I think, rethought a little bit. The physicists have done pretty well with archive, where they have a publication vehicle using the Internet that bypasses reviews and lets people read it and see what's up on it. But all sorts of things like that need to happen. I mean, what Will is saying is true. I'm sure science of climate has been set back at least two generations by this.

[Joe Rogan]

Well, it just seems like it's bad for any kind of science and that open free discussion and debating ideas based on their merit and what data you have, that's what it's supposed to be about. It's not supposed to be attached to an ideology. And I just don't understand how it got this far and how it can be separated. So when did it really become a problem where ideology started invading into certain segments of science?

[Will Happer]

Well, it's happened many times in the past, Joe. Climate is only the most recent.

[Joe Rogan]

So it's just a natural thing that happens.

[Will Happer]

Well, for example, there was the eugenics movement in America and Britain and Western Europe where the claim was that the great gene pool, you know, of the Anglo Saxon race, was being diluted by all these low Q Italians and Eastern European Jews and Chinamen. It was all completely nonsense. But they had learned journals where you could could publish an article that proved that. And you had the presidents of Harvard and Stanford and Princeton, Alexander Graham Bell being great eugenicists, you know, protecting the American genome. And it was all nonsense. It was just complete bullshit. And yet, and the only thing that stopped it really was the Nazis because they took it over with a vengeance. You know, they took were big fans of the eugenics movement in America and Britain and they took it to its absurd extreme.

[Dick Lindzen]

They also gave an honorary degree to the leading eugenicist in America, a man called Laughlin. But oh my goodness, no, I mean, what Will is saying I mean, it had a practical consequence, by the way. It actually led to the Immigration Restriction act of 1924, which held that America was going to restrict immigrants to percentages based on the population in the 19th century. So there would be a quota for England and Scotland, which was fine, a little bit less for Germany, almost nothing for Eastern Europe, almost nothing for Italy and so on. And that was used in the run up to World War II to allow Roosevelt to prevent Jews from escaping Europe. Wow. And it was only changed in 1960. So essentially you were keeping out Jews, Eastern Europeans, Chinese until then because of eugenics. In 1924.

[Joe Rogan]

We. You know, the average person that's not involved in science always wants to think of science as being this incredibly pure thing amongst intellectuals, or they're trying to figure out how the world works. When you hear stories like that, you hear that kind of stuff and you're just like, oh, this has always been a problem.

[Dick Lindzen]

You're dealing with people, human beings. Yeah, that's the problem.

[Joe Rogan]

Right.

[Will Happer]

That's getting to the heart of the problem, Joe. This famous quote by Immanuel Kant, you know, from the crooked timber of mankind, no straight thing was ever made. That goes for science as well as every other aspect of human society.

[Joe Rogan]

What could have been done to protect the scientific process from this sort of an ideological invasion, or at least shelter it somewhat, to make sure that something like eugenics doesn't ever get pushed or climate or any. Anything that's just not logical and doesn't fit with the data?

[Dick Lindzen]

Well, the trouble is, you know, when something like eugenics comes around, the population is told that this is science. Right. And how are they going to say no? I mean, you had various famous laboratories devoted to this. It wasn't a fringe thing. And so I don't know how you distinguish it at that time from science today. There are books on it and you have the correspondence of biologists who are saying, well, it's a little bit dicey, but they're saying it's bringing it to the fore of public attention. So maybe that's a good thing.

[Joe Rogan]

Well, it just makes you shudder to think, like, what happens if the Nazis didn't take over Germany and eugenics continued to progress in America. That's terrifying to think where we would be today.

[Will Happer]

Right, right. We'd have been a much poorer country because so many leading Americans, you know, creative, productive people, have immigrated, you know, fairly recently.

[Joe Rogan]

Also probably would have led to some horrific actions in order to enact this.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah, I mean, when you put things in the hands of politicians There is a disconnect. I mean, the business with light bulbs I mentioned, it wasn't malice, it was ignorance. And you combine ignorance with power and you often get nonsense and the narrative.

[Joe Rogan]

That you're doing something good for everybody.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

[Will Happer]

Dick has often made the point, which I agree with, that politicians and sort of society leaders are the worst in situations like this. The ordinary person is often a little bit more skeptical and more reasonable.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah.

[Will Happer]

So, for example, I'd like to tease Dick because he's a Harvard grad about the Salem witch trials, but they were orchestrated by people from. From Harvard. You know, it was not the common people.

[Joe Rogan]

Have you ever read into that at all?

[Will Happer]

Yeah, I've looked into it carefully.

[Joe Rogan]

What do you think about the ergot poisoning theory?

[Will Happer]

Well, does it make sense? I don't know. Most of the testimony was from young women, about the same age as Greta Thunberg, by the way. And, you know, they had these visions of the person they were accused consorting with the devil and doing all sorts of obscene things. And that was accepted as testimony. It was called spectral evidence. And so when.

[Joe Rogan]

Wow.

[Will Happer]

When finally the trials were stopped, it wasn't for the right reason, which is that there's no such thing as witches. You know, they were stopped because spectral evidence, you know, was shaky. It was being used against the Harvard judges themselves at that point. So it was getting very dangerous, you know. But one of them was selling a book on how to. How. How to detect witches. Cotton Mather, you know.

[Joe Rogan]

Well, I've read that as well about the printing press. When the printing press was first devised, a lot of people were like, oh, we're going to get so much knowledge. No, a lot of the early books were like, how to detect witches.

[Will Happer]

Right. That's right. Malleus Maleficorum, you know, the Hammer of the Evildoers. That was the first book on witches.

[Joe Rogan]

What I'd read about Salem, though, was that they had core samples that detected a late frost and that they believed this late frost might have contributed to ergot growth. Because apparently that does happen a lot when the plants grow and then they freeze and then they get mold on them. And that mold could contain ergot, and that has LSD like properties, which totally makes sense if they're eating LSD laced bread and they thought everybody was a witch. But either way.

[Will Happer]

Yeah, yeah, it took. I think that's a kinder explanation of what happened. I'm less generous.

[Joe Rogan]

Well, you know, more about the behind the scenes.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah, no, but I mean, people. I think what Will is saying is there are people who always want to have a chance to do in their neighbor.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

Yes, sure.

[Joe Rogan]

And if you could say your neighbor's a witch, what better way? We can't have witches in our neighborhood. Let's burn them or drown them at the time. Right. That's what they did to people.

[Will Happer]

Yeah, yeah. That's one of the parts of Orwell's 1984 that many people forget. But a big part of that was every day there was two minutes of hate. And so people seem to have this need for hatred. You know, you have to have a part of the day where you can hate something or somebody. And so if you're hating CO2, at least that's better than hating your neighbor.

[Joe Rogan]

Well, if you're on Twitter, you're using up a lot more than two minutes of hate.

[Dick Lindzen]

Well, you know, but even with political figures, I'm always surprised. I mean, it seems obvious that any political figure who is exploiting hate and fear probably does not mean. Well.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah.

[Dick Lindzen]

And yet we continually fall over and over again.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah, yeah, all of them. And, you know, other countries do the same pattern.

[Dick Lindzen]

Oh, yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

That's what's dark. It just seems like we're terrified of being terrified. And we want safety and we want someone who comes along and scares the shit out of us and vows to protect us.

[Will Happer]

Yep. Yeah.

[Dick Lindzen]

Children do this all the time. Go into a dark closet and frighten yourself.

[Joe Rogan]

Well, there is also terrible things in the world and terrible people in the world, but when you have just everything scares the shit out of everybody. Everything is the end of the world. And climate being one of the key ones that I hear all the time with young people. In fact, there were some recent surveys that were done, if you know about these. The things that give young people the most anxiety.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

And climate is at the very top of that list.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah. I mean, it's really strange to think that this is causing young people not to want to have children, not to want to continue to have no hope for the future. This is bizarre.

[Joe Rogan]

And just to live in constant fear of one day. But meanwhile, is anybody paying attention to all these rich people buying shoreline property?

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

Do you think they're stupid?

[Joe Rogan]

Stupid? Do you think Jeff Bezos is a dumbass because he's buying these giant mansions, like, right on the ocean? Like, do you really think the water.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

This episode is brought to you by Lifelock. October is cybersecurity awareness month. A reminder that your digital life is always at risk. Every day, hackers steal identities, drain bank accounts, and open fraudulent accounts using stolen information. LifeLock is here with tips to prevent you from becoming a victim of identity theft. Use strong passwords, set up multi factor authentication on your accounts, recognize and report phishing, and regularly update the software on your devices. And for real peace of mind, get LifeLock. LifeLock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats to your identity. If your identity is stolen, a LifeLock US based restoration specialist will help solve identity theft issues on your behalf, guaranteed need or your money back. Plus, all LifeLock plans are backed by the million dollar protection package, meaning LifeLock will reimburse you to your plan's limits if you lose money due to identity theft. Stay smart, stay safe and stay protected with Lifelock. Get comprehensive identity Protection with a 30 day free [e-mail] jre that's lifelock.com jre for 30 days. Free terms apply. This episode is brought to you by Tractor Supply. Every town's got its heroes. Veterans, firefighters, EMTs, police officers. The folks who show up when it matters most. Tractor Supply calls them Hometown Heroes. Verified Hometown Heroes receive exclusive Neighbors club perks like 2% back on every purchase, free trailer rentals, same day delivery, and special discounts on hero holidays like July 4th and Veterans Day. It's easy to join. Just sign up for Neighbor's Club and verify through ID me. The benefits kick in automatically. Learn more at tractorsupply.com hometownheroes is going.

[Joe Rogan]

To raise that much and should I.

[Dick Lindzen]

Put it, I mean, you know, even the people who are pushing it at mit, I mean, buy houses. Of course Obama did.

[Joe Rogan]

He got that beautiful house and Martha's Vineyard. It's like if you've looked at the timelines, I'm sure you have like time lapse video of the shoreline from like 1980 all the way up to 2025. It doesn't move. I mean it goes a little bit in Malibu and there's a lot of.

[Dick Lindzen]

They go back much further than that.

[Will Happer]

Yes, I think, Joe, it's true sea level is rising. It's different at different shores because the land is also rising and sinking, but it's not very much and it hasn't accelerated the there's no evidence that CO2 has made any difference. It started rising roughly 1800 at the end of the Little Ice Age and it's not changing very much.

[Joe Rogan]

And wasn't there like an unprecedented amount of arctic ice that's increased recently?

[Will Happer]

That's right, yeah.

[Dick Lindzen]

I mean that's always variable.

[Joe Rogan]

Right. But when that happens, how come that doesn't hit the news? If the ice Goes away, then it's gonna hit the news. Oh, my God, look at this. We lost a chunk the size of Manhattan and everybody freaks out.

[Dick Lindzen]

Well, we were supposed to be ice free 20 years ago.

[Joe Rogan]

Yes. Yeah.

[Dick Lindzen]

No.

[Joe Rogan]

You know, Alvaro was just off by a little bit. He's just give him some decades to be vindicated.

[Dick Lindzen]

Well, that is the point that I think people have made. A test usually means if you fail it, you've done something wrong.

[Joe Rogan]

Yes.

[Dick Lindzen]

Only in theology does it mean that you change the goals.

[Joe Rogan]

Right, right. Especially when you invented theology, because climate is very much like a religion, or at least the adherence to it is very religious, like. Or I should say cult, like, because it's not like. Like there's a higher power. Everyone's just terrified. And you have to change everything you.

[Dick Lindzen]

Do now because you're guilty.

[Joe Rogan]

And it used to be that, like, the sign of virtue was to have an electric car. And then every. My favorite thing is going up behind Teslas now. And they have bumper stickers that say, I bought this before Elon went crazy. So now they don't.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

I mean, it's just everyone is trying.

[Joe Rogan]

To figure out what they're supposed to do in order to still be accepted by their group. And the climate one is one that if you bring it up with people, it's almost like you're talking about witches. Like, they want to get out of there. Like, if you actually looked at. Oh, yeah, yeah, it's a religious or a cult like thing.

[Will Happer]

Absolutely. Yeah.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

And they don't really.

[Joe Rogan]

It's not like they've studied it a lot.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

And yeah, it's really interesting.

[Joe Rogan]

And this is why I think that we've got to reduce CO2. And you have like this informed discussion with someone. You go, oh, okay, okay. So when did you start reading about this? What book was that? Where, you know, did you see this? And you see that and. Okay, and you now you have an informed discussion. But that's not what it's like. It's like you bring it up and they're like, oh, God, climate change is settled. Climate change is settled. Okay.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

You don't believe.

[Joe Rogan]

Even Bernie, when I had him on when he was talking about climate change is a real problem, a giant problem. And we started showing the Washington Post thing that says that we're in a global cooling period.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

And it's raised up sometime over the last hundred.

[Joe Rogan]

But if you look at like the.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

Peaks and valleys, the main thing is.

[Joe Rogan]

Like, this has never been static. And I said to Bernie, I'm like.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

There'S a lot of money in this.

[Joe Rogan]

Bernie, you've got to admit this, like.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

This isn't something that we have to act on now to save each other. It might be something that we're being fucked with.

[Joe Rogan]

And that's what it seems like to me.

[Dick Lindzen]

It's like, well, the question is, why does he find it so enthus? Why is he so enthusiastic, wonderful for funding?

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah, I think he's overall a very good person. I really do, and I think he would have been a fascinating president. But I think there are too many things to concentrate on in the world. And if you really want to do a deep dive into the actual science of climate and CO2's impact on climate and what actually causes us to get warmer or colder, that's a lot of work. It's a lot of work. And I don't know if the Senator of Vermont has enough time to do.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

That work and to really do it objectively or to talk to someone like you, to have an informed conversation with.

[Joe Rogan]

Someone who studied it for decades and go, okay, there's a lot more to this than I thought.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

And why does it fit in the same damn pattern where people get attached to an idea?

[Joe Rogan]

Because that idea is attached to their ideology.

[Dick Lindzen]

But you're hitting on a problem, and I think Will knows this as well. A lot of this stuff is actually tough material.

[Joe Rogan]

Yes.

[Dick Lindzen]

I mean, for instance, the question of what determines the temperature difference between the tropics and the poles, that's actually handled in a third year graduate course. You know, it deals with hydrodynamic instability, which is a complicated subject and it's a real problem in a field. It's true throughout science, where you're trusting people to behave, I think, decently. But that material itself is not going to be entirely accessible to everyone and how you deal with it, how you approximate it. The same is true with nuclear power, with other things. These are technical issues, they're not trivial. And you're asking in a democratic society for people to make decisions. That's a tough issue. It involves a certain amount of trust. And what we're describing is a situation where the trust is being violated.

[Will Happer]

Yeah. There's this nice Russian proverb that Ronald Reagan loved so much. Trust but verify. And it's hard to verify, you know, if you're an average citizen. Something about climate.

[Joe Rogan]

Right. That's what's so frustrating about this conversation, when you have it with people that are indoctrinated, when they're like, climate change is a giant issue. Like, there's so many times I've seen they're very fun YouTube videos where they catch people at these protests and some joker just starts interviewing them and they clearly don't know what the hell they're protesting for. It's fascinating that you left the house like you had nothing better to do. You don't know why you're protesting, but you're there and you got a sign and you still don't even understand it. That's how powerful this thing has become in our society. And the fact that they've been so that the powers that be or whoever is involved has been so successful at pushing this narrative that it's one of the number one anxieties that young people have about the future in a place.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

Where we may very well be involved.

[Joe Rogan]

In war, like, but the war doesn't freak them out as much as being involved in a climate emergency.

[Dick Lindzen]

How dare you?

[Will Happer]

Right, there you go.

[Dick Lindzen]

But you notice how quickly she changed.

[Joe Rogan]

She flipped up. Now it's Palestine. You got to mix it up.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

People get bored with the climate.

[Joe Rogan]

You gotta, you listen, you want to be someone that's in the news, you got to keep moving, you got to keep it moving. You know, you stop doing rap music, start acting, you got to keep it moving. And that's, you know, she's an entertainer. Well, she had a very unfortunate experience with that blockade in Israel. So maybe she's out of the business now, but I doubt it. But when you're taking a 16 year old kid and having her as the face of climate change like, and as you said, this is something insanely difficult to digest for the average person and you know, she doesn't have this data at her fingertips.

[Dick Lindzen]

It's not just digest. I mean, it's how many people can solve partial differential equations. This is one of the complaints I have, which is sort of odd. People blame this on models. And what the models are doing is they're taking the equations of fluid mechanics, something called the Navier Stokes equation, and they're doing it by dividing it into discrete intervals and seeing how things change with distance and time and so on. And one of the things that we know is no one has ever proven that this actually leads to the solution, but it's used for weather forecasting and all sorts of things and so on. At any rate, they do this and I think many of the people doing it are doing it carefully or as carefully as they can and they get answers that will often be wrong. But as best I can tell, none of these models predict catastrophe. Koonin made the point, I think correctly, that Even with the UN's models, you're talking about a 3% reduction in national product or gross domestic product by 2,100. That's not a great deal. It's not the end of the earth. You're already much richer than you are today, so what's the panic? And it's true, the models don't give you anything to be that panicked over. So the politicians and the environmentalists invent extreme descriptions that actually don't have much to do with the models, but they blame the models. So, you know, it's a confusing situation. The models have a use. They just shouldn't be used to predict exactly what the future is. You can use them to see what interacts with what and then study it further.

[Will Happer]

Joe, let me just say a little more about what Dick commented on. Navier Stokes equation, which describes fluid motion, the atmosphere, the oceans. And it really is a very hard mathematical problem to solve, because they're not only partial differential equations, they're what are called nonlinear partial differential equations. And so there's a joke about Werner Heisenberg, who was the inventor of quantum mechanics, a very bright guy, and he was the head of the Nazi atomic bomb program during World War II. And so he was captured by the Americans and the British, and because of this activity, was forbidden to work on nuclear physics later, you know, after the victory. And so he decided to work on fluid mechanics, on solving the Navier Stokes equation. And he was a, as I said, a tremendously talented physicist. And. But he found it very hard. He didn't make very much progress because it's much harder than quantum mechanics or much harder than relativity to solve those equations. And so one of his students supposedly said to him, well, you know, Professor Heisenberg, they say that if you've been a good physicist when you die and you go to heaven, that the Almighty allows you to ask two questions, and he will answer any question you ask. And what will you ask him? And Eisenberg supposedly said, well, I will ask him why general relativity and why turbulence? Turbulence is the Navier Stokes Equation, he says, and I think he will be able to answer the first one.

[Joe Rogan]

That's funny. That's funny. And this is what's, you know, the best assumption or the best measurements of what's controlling the temperature on Earth.

[Will Happer]

Well, you know, they're asking you to have great confidence in a calculation involving this miserable equation that is so hard to solve, at least very far into the future. You can solve it for a short time, but it's very hard to go much Further, one of Dick's colleagues at mit, a man named Lorenzo. Why don't you tell him about Lorenzo?

[Dick Lindzen]

Well, no, Lorentz is credited with chaos theory, but basically it's a statement that these are not predictable. Whether that's true or not is still an open question, but it has a lot of those characteristics in detail. I mean, you know, for instance, it wouldn't be a surprise if you're looking at a bubbling brook and you have all those little eddies and so on. Are you actually able to track the whole thing accurately? Probably not. How accurately would you have to do it? If you scaled it up to climate, who knows?

[Will Happer]

Yeah. The typical description of this theory was that it's as though a butterfly flapping its wings in the Gulf of Alaska causes hurricanes two years later, Florida.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah, that one's funny. Yeah, people repeat that and they're like, no, that's not how it works at all.

[Will Happer]

I don't think it works.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

Of course, it's funny when people like.

[Dick Lindzen]

Well, what it does. What I think he meant was rather simpler than that. You know, the hurricane is likely to occur. The flipping of a butterfly's wings might have actually changed it from one day to another. It would have an influence downstream.

[Joe Rogan]

Everything has an influence. Everything is tied in together.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

Now, when we make models based on.

[Joe Rogan]

Incorrect data about, like, CO2 levels and what the temperature in the future is going to look like, at what point in time do you think another country needs to screw up? The same way Nazi Germany ran with eugenics and it ruined eugenics in the United States, where they're like, oh, my God, this is a horrific idea. Do you think something like that has to happen in another country where they have to take this climate change green energy thing to its full end? You think so?

[Will Happer]

I don't think that's how it will end. Yes. I think Britain or Germany may be the sacrificial country because Germany has shut.

[Joe Rogan]

Off a couple of their nuclear power plants.

[Will Happer]

Correct, Right. All of their nuclear power plants.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

Oh, God. And they did it all for green energy.

[Dick Lindzen]

That makes no sense.

[Will Happer]

Well, I think they did it because of the Fukushima thing and because the Green Party is so powerful in Germany, and they not only turned off their plants and not nuclear and coal as well, but they blew a lot of them up. You know, you see these pictures of the plants, you know, being blown up by dynamite just to make sure that nobody restarts them. So they're fanatics.

[Joe Rogan]

Oh, my God.

[Will Happer]

The real fanatics. Yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

That's so crazy.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah.

[Will Happer]

Yeah. And so at Some point, some country like Germany, they'll lose all their jobs. All the industry will move. There'll be no jobs. People will all be on welfare. There's no money to pay them. And at that point, someone will realize, you know, we've taken a wrong turn here.

[Joe Rogan]

I can't believe they blew their plants up. That's nuts. And what are they replacing with? Right now you have Russian gas.

[Will Happer]

Windmills.

[Joe Rogan]

Windmills, yeah.

[Dick Lindzen]

But you're right.

[Will Happer]

They're importing fossil fuels and importing electricity from France, which still has a large nuclear power base.

[Joe Rogan]

But how is Germany so smart and so dumb at the same time? Because they have tremendous engineers. They make some of the best automobiles ever.

[Dick Lindzen]

They're making them in Hungary.

[Will Happer]

But that's a profound question, is how is it that this country of poets and philosophers had the Nazis? Had the Nazis, exactly. And Dietrich Bonhoeffer was one of the few German theologians who had the courage to remain in Nazi Germany. He was invited to come to the US but he said, I'm going to stay with my people. And he was eventually hung by the Nazis. He didn't survive. But he had this theory that it was stupidity. And it's a very interesting theory. If you look on the Internet, you can read about Bonhoeffer's theory of stupidity. But he. His view was that all of these Nazi supporters, they didn't really believe in it all. They were just dumb. You know, it's hard for me, when I first read about this, I couldn't believe in. But the more I look at it, I think that every nation has the problem that most of us are pretty stupid.

[Joe Rogan]

There's a large percentage of us that will believe almost anything.

[Will Happer]

Right.

[Joe Rogan]

And we could point to a lot of things that are subjects in the Zeitgeist right now that people wholeheartedly believe in. That makes zero sense.

[Will Happer]

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

They could go with that. And you would go, okay, there's. There's some part of this has to be attributed to low intelligence. So, like, what percentage of people in this country are incapable of thinking for themselves? It's not a small number. Maybe it's 10, maybe it's 20. Whatever percentage, it's enough.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

Where it's a giant problem, that's one thing.

[Dick Lindzen]

But also intelligence itself is a complex issue. There are people who, like us, may be idiots of aunts. There are things that we can do very well and other things we don't.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah, absolutely.

[Dick Lindzen]

I mean, you know, meth departments are famous, though.

[Joe Rogan]

Well, I think it's a sign of almost any great person at anything. There's usually areas in their life where they're just completely lacking, whether it's hygiene or relationships or whatever, they're obsessed by what they do, and that's why they're great at what they do.

[Dick Lindzen]

You know, look, there are great writers who can't do arithmetic.

[Will Happer]

Right.

[Dick Lindzen]

I don't know where you put them in that category.

[Joe Rogan]

Right.

[Will Happer]

Well.

[Joe Rogan]

And there's great physical athletes that they have an intelligence of moving their body in a way that they understand things at a much higher level than anybody else that does Whatever their athletic pursuit is, they probably wouldn't do that well on an ACT test. Doesn't mean that they're not intelligent. It's just. It's a different kind of intelligence.

[Will Happer]

Yeah.

[Dick Lindzen]

That makes the world a more interesting place, by and large.

[Joe Rogan]

It really does. But what's scary is when you count on the people that are supposed to be the people that are obsessed and studying this one thing like this climate change emergency that we're supposed to be under, and then you find out, oh, wait a minute, this is not. This isn't like an exact science.

[Dick Lindzen]

Oh, we started with core.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

Right.

[Dick Lindzen]

And Gore flunked out of Harvard.

[Joe Rogan]

Did he?

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah, and his father, who was a senator, got him back in. I was teaching there at the time.

[Joe Rogan]

Oh, really?

[Will Happer]

Interesting.

[Dick Lindzen]

And the person he attributes his awareness of CO2 to, Roger Revell, was teaching a sort of Science for Poets course, and he got a D minus in.

[Joe Rogan]

It.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

Is he made the most money.

[Joe Rogan]

Off of this because he's made a lot of money off of cars.

[Dick Lindzen]

He's made a few hundred million. I don't know. These days, small change.

[Joe Rogan]

Still, there's a very clear motivation to keep that graph going. You know, it's. Especially now with social media. There's so many people that can. Like we were talking about Greta Thunberg. I mean, I don't know what her mother motivations are, but I do know that there's a lot of people out there that have large social media platforms that all they want to do is connect themselves to something that people are talking about all the time. And there's a lot of money in that. And there's a lot of, you know, a lot of power in wielding that influence and to do so didn't just hop on any bandwagon that comes along and not really know what you're talking about is. It's a. It's a real problem that we have in society today.

[Dick Lindzen]

And it's, in a way, a new problem given social media.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah, yeah. The social media aspect of it is a new problem. Another new problem is AI and fakes. Like you see fake videos and fake news stories and fake articles and it's like it's very. It takes time to pay attention to what's real and what's not real today. And so if somebody wanted to push any kind of a narrative about anything, especially climate change.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

This episode is brought to you by Paramount plus streaming October 26th on Paramount plus is an all new season of the Mayor of Kingstown. Academy award nominee Jeremy Renner returns as Mike McCluskey, an ex con fighting to keep peace both inside and outside the prison walls of Kingstown as he faces off with the new warden played by Emmy award winner Edie Falco, mayor of Kingstowne. New season streaming October 26th on Paramount Plus. This episode is brought to you by Gold Belly.

[Joe Rogan]

This is insane.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

There's a site called Gold Belly and they ship legendary food from America's best restaurants straight to your house anywhere. Doesn't matter where you live, they'll find you. I'm talking pastrami from New York, Terry Black's brisket in Austin, Lou Malnati's deep dish from Chicago, Pat's cheesesteaks from Philly, Promonti Bros. Sandwiches in Pittsburgh, Maine lobster rolls, the real deal straight from these iconic mom and pop shops all across the country. And the best part, anyone can make Gold Belly and be eating world class food in minutes. Game day, fight night, friends coming over. Don't be the person with frozen grocery store wings. Show up with Texas barbecue and actual Philly cheesesteaks and people will think you teleported it in. You're the legend of the party. Go to goldbelly.com, use the promo code rogan and get 20% off your first order. That's goldbelly.com code rogan for 20% off your first order. Gold belly legendary food shipped anywhere.

[Joe Rogan]

You could scare the out of somebody very quickly with a nice video. And it doesn't even have to be real.

[Dick Lindzen]

Well, that was the reason for extreme weather being chosen. I mean it's interesting. For quite a few years the climate issue was temperature. And you'll have noticed the last 15, 20 years it's extreme weather, right? And that shows that it was fake because it's trivial. If you looked it up the average month, there are four or five extreme events someplace in that month that are once in a hundred year events. So each of them makes for a good video and you have four or five a month and they each only oneness in a hundred years and people aren't putting it together that you know, once in a hundred year events occurring four or five times a month. But you know, you always have a picture of a flood someplace or a rise or this or that. And those are used to scare people. It's got harder and harder to scare people with numbers.

[Joe Rogan]

Right? It's extreme weather events. That's what I keep hearing. The hurricanes are getting stronger, they're getting more frequent and they repeat that. And I don't think that's necessarily true.

[Dick Lindzen]

No, no. For years. Because the ipcc, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change of the UN was honestly saying they could find no evidence that these were related. The last one they had to say something because the politicians control what's in the ipcc. But even with that they were saying no. And that had nothing to do with the. The public relations said to hell with it. Even if there's no relation, we'll say there is. Because that gives us visuals.

[Joe Rogan]

God, now when people like Bill Gates start talking about putting reflective particles in the atmosphere to cool off the earth and protect us from the sun's rays, where is all that coming from? Especially if like you would imagine.

[Dick Lindzen]

I think even Will said it comes from dumbness.

[Joe Rogan]

Well, I'm sure, but even proposing something like that should have the whole world up in arms, like hey, a few people can't make a decision that will literally impact the entire world and possibly trigger a catastrophic drop in temperature that kills us all.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

Why? Because you made Microsoft. Why do you get to do this? That seems like something you would have to have the whole world vote on.

[Dick Lindzen]

On.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

And they would have to be like really well informed about what the consequences.

[Joe Rogan]

Of this going wrong could be.

[Will Happer]

Well, I'd have, I have to hope that most of the world agrees with you and me and that Bill Gates will never be permitted to do something like that.

[Joe Rogan]

The fear is that someone would let him though. The fear is that a country would let them. You get the right politicians in place and the right fear mongering in place and you let them try or you let somebody try. And these people that do try get large grants and they're making a lot of money to do this. And that's what scares the shit out of me, that this could be a way that people could try something out on the whole world that could be catastrophic.

[Will Happer]

Well, just technically it would be extremely difficult because the amount of material you have to get up to the stratosphere to, to mimic a large stratovolcano. Even Bill Gates probably can't afford that. And I'm not sure the US Treasurer could either.

[Joe Rogan]

So it's just theoretical at this point.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah. I think it's an interesting thing you're pointing that someone like Gates has delusions of grandeur based on the fact that he's fabulously wealthy. But as a practical matter, that particular approach probably is not going to be as dangerous as you think. It won't work.

[Joe Rogan]

It won't work.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

Well, it's just the idea that someone would even propose something like that based on what you gentlemen have discussed so far today.

[Dick Lindzen]

No, your point is, right? I mean, you have people who have the means to try things and they're getting a free ride on this.

[Joe Rogan]

Yes, that's the thing. They're getting a lot of money to implement these changes. That's why these green new deals and these green energy initiatives and all these green things people have to understand. Why are you hearing about this all the time? Because it's a PR campaign. It's a PR campaign for a group of people that are trying to make a lot of money. That's what this is all about.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

And the more you get on board.

[Joe Rogan]

The more money they can get politicians to spend on this stuff and the more money these companies make. And the whole thing is about money.

[Will Happer]

Much of it is money.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

They're not really worried about you.

[Joe Rogan]

That's what you have to understand.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

If they ever say that they're worried about your future. For the betterment of our people. We have to make sure that everybody's okay. We gotta protect the climate. They don't care. That's not real.

[Joe Rogan]

What they really wanna do is make sure a lot of money comes in.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

And if a lot of money coming.

[Joe Rogan]

In is dependent upon them scaring the shit out of you, that's what they lean towards.

[Dick Lindzen]

And you know, money and its transferability and fungibility, its influence, its feedbacks, it's this. Yeah, but that's always been true.

[Joe Rogan]

Yes.

[Will Happer]

Yeah. Joel, let me bring up another targeted group, and that is farmers and ranchers. You know, because of their supposed contribution to greenhouse warming. Just a couple years ago, I was invited to come down to Paraguay by some farmers there who were worried about the upcoming climate talks in the Persian Gulf. And the European bankers were demanding that Paraguay turn most of its ranch land back into forest, you know, to save the planet. And otherwise they wouldn't give loans to Paraguay. And so the. The ranchers were worried that they're going to be put out of business and their families put out of business. So I was there for a Week. And I talked to the president, and luckily it turned out they had a very sensible president. And he didn't need me to recognize it was nonsense. But he was, I think, grateful to have someone with a science background confirm his suspicion that it was all nonsense. So he went to the conference and basically told the bankers, you know, to go to hell. And they didn't pull the funding out of Paraguay. So there were no consequences, and the ranchers did not suffer. But, you know, everybody's under the gun.

[Dick Lindzen]

But there were consequences in Ireland.

[Will Happer]

Yeah.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yes. They had to kill half their cattle.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah.

[Dick Lindzen]

Which is nonsense.

[Joe Rogan]

Total nonsense and insane. And if you pay attention to what regenerative farmers will tell you is that, like, if you do it correctly, there's the. It's actually carbon neutral.

[Will Happer]

At least carbon neutral.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

At least carbon neutral. And possibly contribute. The whole thing is nature. This is how it's all set up. Animals eat grass.

[Joe Rogan]

They poop.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

Manure. Manure fertilizes the plants. It's all real simple. It's been around forever. And this idea that all sudden cow.

[Joe Rogan]

Farts and burps are a giant issue and they're gonna kill us all. We need to kill all the cows. Like, who are you? Like, who's saying this? How'd you get to talk. Like, this is.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

How'd you get to kill half their cows?

[Joe Rogan]

Like, you should go to jail.

[Will Happer]

They should go to jail.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

You're so stupid. You're criminally stupid.

[Joe Rogan]

You killed their cows.

[Dick Lindzen]

But when it comes to attractive drugs, power is one of the worst.

[Joe Rogan]

It might be the worst. Yeah, it might be the worst. And it's. If people can get people to do their bidding, they often love to do it. Even if it's preposterous, like getting you to kill half your cows so that you have a less high methane count. You're releasing from your organization.

[Dick Lindzen]

I mean, you know, Will has worked on this and others, but, you know, the methane thing is an example of innumeracy. In other words, what they argue is that a molecule of methane.

[Will Happer]

Methane.

[Dick Lindzen]

Has more greenhouse potential than a molecule of CO2. Cutting back methane will have a big effect, but there's so little methane in the atmosphere that he got rid of all of it. It would have almost no effect compared to CO2. Somehow that step in the arithmetic gets lost.

[Will Happer]

Yeah, simple arithmetic. They just can't do simple arithmetic. Yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

It's just weird how these narratives become so prominent in social media. It's really weird how things like CO2 become this mantra that everybody chants. It seems very coordinated. And actually kind of impressive that they've managed to silence questioning scientists. Scientists. And really put the fear of God into people that read things and don't agree with it.

[Dick Lindzen]

It began right at the beginning of the issue as I was mentioning. I mean, already by 1989, Science magazine was, in fact one of the ironies with Science magazine, which is, you know, important magazine. It had an editor who was Marcia McNut, who actually had an op ed appear in Science magazine saying she would not accept any article that questioned this. Wow. And you know what her reward was? She became president of the National Academy of Science.

[Joe Rogan]

She was a good girl.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

Follow the rules.

[Will Happer]

But, you know, Dick's point about forbidding questioning, it's just unbelievable. When I was a young man, my first job was at Columbia, and the grand old man there was Robbie. Robbie. I, I, Robbie and Robbie came from a Eastern European Jewish family, and his mother had a very poor education, but she was determined that he would get a good education. And, and so he would always tell me, you know, when I would go home from school every day, my mother wouldn't ask me, what did you learn today in school? Is he. She called him Izzy Isidore. And he would tell her, and then she would say, and did you ask a good question today? So I said she was really more interested in whether he had asked a good question, which would mean that the wheels were turning in his head than whether he had memorized something. And I always took that to heart. I think that was a very wise mother. And he turned out very well as a result.

[Joe Rogan]

Do you think there's more uniformity in thinking in academia now, with the pressure of social media and the pressure of these echo chambers that people find themselves.

[Will Happer]

Of course, yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

That's terrible, because you'd have thought with the Internet, one of the things. The Internet's gonna be a balanced resource of information. You're gonna have the answers to any questions you want, and we'll be able to sort out what's true and what's not true. Nobody took into account echo chambers and then ideology being attached to science.

[Will Happer]

That's right.

[Dick Lindzen]

No, I mean, the Internet, not surprisingly, was an unpredictable phenomenon.

[Joe Rogan]

Yes, completely.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah. I mean, you know, you saw it, but, well, you're seeing it yourself. I mean, you have media. They were looking for 100,000 subscribers. With the Internet, you're dealing with millions, and that's considered small in some cases.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah. There's people like Mr. Beast, some fun guy on YouTube that I think he has. What does he have? A hundred? And how Many million subscribers. Is he something insane? Way bigger than any television show that's ever existed before. Yeah, Nobody saw it coming. Did it on his own. Yeah, it's. It's a weird time. And then there's a lack of trust in mainstream media, which is also disturbing.

[Dick Lindzen]

Also deserved, right?

[Joe Rogan]

Also deserved. That's a problem as well. And when you see mainstream media also going along with all these climate change ideologies and all these different things that are attached to the narrative that you're not allowed to deviate from, it's just. It gets very frustrating.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah. I mean, I'm not sure about this, but my recollection was as a kid in New York that you had newspapers like the New York Times that were always sort of center left, but you had others, the Journal American and so on, and they differed in their coverage, but on the whole they covered the same news. If something happened, it would appear in both. I realize in retrospect that wasn't always true, but today I have the feeling that if I look at the Post in New York or the New York Times, I'm looking at two different worlds.

[Will Happer]

Right, right.

[Dick Lindzen]

And there's something wrong with that.

[Joe Rogan]

Very. Yeah, something very wrong with it. And I don't. I don't know what the answer is is to how to solve it or if those things need to just go away and independent media needs to replace them. But you're seeing a massive dissolving of trust in these. Like when I was a kid, I used to deliver the New York Times and I delivered the Boston Globe, but I delivered the New York Times as well because it was prestigious. I thought it was cool to deliver the New York Times and it was a long route. It was a lot longer than my Boston Globe.

[Dick Lindzen]

Did you have to deliver it on Sunday as well?

[Joe Rogan]

Yes, I did. Yes, I did. But fortunately the ads didn't work. So they didn't get a big thick ad chunk like you do with the Boston Globe because it's like local ads. But the point being is that like.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

It was, it was the paper of record.

[Joe Rogan]

And now today it's just another blog. It's just like it's an ideologically captured online blog that's very left leaning.

[Dick Lindzen]

I think people have pointed out the correct reason for that. The end of the classified ads. They used to have to satisfy the people paying for ads, now they have to satisfy their readers. And so the readers only want to hear one thing.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah, it's a real problem. It's a real problem. But I guess just like all things that Happen there'll be some sort of a course correction or some new players will enter in.

[Dick Lindzen]

And it was, you know, it would be fine if the newspapers took different positions but covered the same items.

[Joe Rogan]

Right, right, right.

[Dick Lindzen]

And here I will say, and maybe there's a bias in this. If I listen to msnbc, there are whole areas of what's going on that I will hear nothing about. Fox may cover things differently, but they're less guilty of leaving stuff out. They may take a different view of it, but you'll hear about it. That certain media now are not even mentioning things that they don't want you to know about is a little bit disturbing.

[Joe Rogan]

It is, it is. But again, it gives rise to independent media, gives rise to the very good independent journalists that exist today. But the thing is, like, the average person is not going to find them. They don't know where to look.

[Will Happer]

Well, this is an opportunity to put in a good word for Al Gore, since he was an inventor of the Internet.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

He did kind of take credit for part of that.

[Will Happer]

Right, right, yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

What did he say exactly?

[Will Happer]

I think he said, I had a hand in that or something like that.

[Joe Rogan]

I did, too. Bought a computer once. I had a hand in that. I played a part of the economy of the Internet.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

Well.

[Joe Rogan]

I think it's these kind of conversations with people like yourself that will help because the more people listen to this and the more people start reading other articles written by different people that also question it, we get a kind of understanding of this pattern that does go back to like we were talking about before with eugenics and with many other things in history. You go, there's times where you're on the wrong side of things. You don't realize it because you've been lied to and you've been, you know, these politicians.

[Dick Lindzen]

But it's also the abuse of science is too much of a temptation for politicians. I mean, science, it's hard to say, but, you know, if there are a way in, of making people understand that science really is not a source of authority, it's a methodology. And that if you are using it as a source of authority and destroying it as a methodology, you're anti science, whether that helps or not. Maybe people don't care.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

Well, I think people do, but they're.

[Joe Rogan]

Scared to deviate again from the narrative. Like, how do you think. Do you think it's possible to get in people's heads? Hey, we have to at the academic level, especially separate ideology from truth. And you can't attach believing in something that is like so firmly a part of being a progressive person or being a conservative person that you're unwilling to look at the data and look at facts. That has to be shunned. So how does that go about.

[Dick Lindzen]

I think you're hitting on something important. You can't do it every place. But with the funding agencies, the government is in a position to say funding agencies must take an open view of certain subjects, or all subjects for that matter, and not lay down rules that you cannot question.

[Will Happer]

Yeah, let me add to that. I think one of the great strengths of American science and technology over the last 50 years was that there was not a single funding agency in Washington. But, you know, you could get funding from the National Science foundation or you could get funding from the Office of Naval Research or, or from some other organization. And they all competed with each other and they didn't like each other very much. And so if you couldn't get a grant from nsf, someone would help you from the army or some other place. So I think multiple sources of funding has an enormously positive effect on the vitality of science and technology in a country. And people used to talk, we need an office of science. I thought that was a terrible idea. You know, to. That means one point failure. You know, there was someone in a position to throttle, you know, some important thing.

[Dick Lindzen]

The Department of Energy tried to do both sides for a long time and they held out longer than other departments. But eventually, for some reason, they were all forced into the same box.

[Joe Rogan]

Money starts talking, baby.

[Will Happer]

Yeah, money.

[Joe Rogan]

It's a lot of money. Department of Energy, wasn't that the department where from the time Trump won the election to Biden leading office, they gave out something like $93 billion in loans.

[Will Happer]

I think it was EPA or maybe it was no loans. Could have. Must have been energy. Must have been energy.

[Joe Rogan]

Like more than had been given out in the last 15 years. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm sure all was smart. Well spent money that we definitely. He couldn't get by without spending. It's kind of funny.

[Will Happer]

Pathetic.

[Joe Rogan]

It is kind of pathetic, but it's also kind of funny like how in this day of transparency, there's so much information that's available today so easy to find things out that they would try to pull something like that off and then do it successfully right in front of everybody's face.

[Will Happer]

Well, having spent time in Department of Energy headquarters, it doesn't surprise me.

[Joe Rogan]

I believe you. How difficult has this been for you gentlemen to debate this stuff and bring it up with people and have conversations? Have you Experienced a lot of resistance.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah. I mean it's interesting how it evolved. I think in the 90s there was still a certain openness about it and you know, if there were a conference, people on both sides would be invited and so on. Somehow by the 21st century it came down hard. There was absolutely nothing open anymore.

[Will Happer]

But I have to say when I invited Dick to give his colloquium on climate and Princeton, it's a good university and he gave a good colloquium. The next day a Nobel prize winner from my department walked in and said, what son of a bitch invited Lindsay to give this talk? I said, well I'm the son of a bitch. Get out of my office.

[Joe Rogan]

Oh, wow.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

And what did you have to. Did you try to engage with him.

[Joe Rogan]

At all about why you were upset? Why he was upset?

[Will Happer]

Right.

[Joe Rogan]

No, just. It wasn't even worth it.

[Will Happer]

It wasn't worth it. Yeah.

[Dick Lindzen]

Wow.

[Joe Rogan]

It's just hard to believe as someone who's outside of academia, it's hard to believe there's closed minded people at universities.

[Will Happer]

The point was he didn't know the first thing about the issue. Not a thing. But he was very left wing.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah, that's the point. That's why.

[Dick Lindzen]

No, this was the political polarization.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah. But it's also, there's no deviation. There's no people like eh, you know, everybody's either one side or the other, all in or not. And if you're not, you get cast out of the kingdom. It's very weird. It's just, just disturbing to someone like me that it goes on like that in universities. If someone come up to you and.

[Dick Lindzen]

Say I think it's worse than universities.

[Joe Rogan]

Wow, how did that get started? Like when did. So it was the same thing as like the climate was with everything. Like somewhere around the 21st century. Like when.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah, you know, I'll take something that was much less publicized. The. What was the program with your device?

[Will Happer]

Oh, the.

[Dick Lindzen]

Star Wars.

[Will Happer]

The sodium guide star.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah. I mean universities treated that as something you could not discuss. The notion that you wanted to have a defense against nuclear. Really?

[Will Happer]

Yeah. What Dick is talking about is that I got called Washington because early in the Star wars era we were asked to look at every possible way to defend against incoming Russian missiles. And so that meant trying to shoot them down with rockets and also trying to shoot them down with high power lasers. During a classified summer study in 1982, there were some people from the Air Force, some generals and technical people and talked about the problem is if you even have A beautiful blue clear sky. And you try to shoot a Russian missile that's coming toward Austin. And by the time the laser reaches the incoming warhead, it breaks up into hundreds of little speckles, not one of which has enough power to cause any damage to the target. And so that was a problem that was well known to astronomers. But the inverse problem, a star does the same thing when you focus it on a photographic plate. You don't get a point, you get lots of speckles. And so astronomers knew how to solve that. You know, the problem is the incoming wave gets wrinkled by the atmosphere. They're little warm patches and cool patches. And so what you can do is you reflect the incoming star light from a anti wrinkled mirror. So it comes in wrinkled, it bounces, it's nice and flat, then it focuses and you get a point. And you could do the same thing when you're trying to shoot an incoming missile. You pre wrinkle the beam so that when it reaches the missile, it actually focuses all the power onto the missile. So it's called adaptive optics. And the mirror is called a rubber mirror. It's a mirror that you can adjust. But to do that you need to know how to adjust the mirror. So you have to have some information to how do I wrinkle it, push here, pull there, etc. And the way the astronomers did it was they used a very bright star in the sky. And then for nearby stars, you could use the bright star to correct your mirror for all the neighboring stars. But it only worked for a degree or two off the direction of the correcting stars. And so unless the Russians attacked us from the, during the night, from the direction of the brightest stars in the skies, we couldn't do anything with our lasers.

[Joe Rogan]

Oh, wow.

[Will Happer]

So I said, well, I know how to fix this. All you need to do is make an artificial star wherever you like, because there's a layer of sodium at 100km and we now have lasers that will excite that. And so you can make a yellow star that's plenty bright enough to use that light to adjust the mirror wherever you like. And nobody had ever heard of the sodium layer during that this was top secret meeting.

[Joe Rogan]

When you say make a star, do you mean like a satellite star?

[Will Happer]

Like a small, a bright object, a source of light shining down through the atmosphere? Most of the the problem is fairly close to the ground, the first kilometer or two up.

[Joe Rogan]

And what would this be made out of?

[Will Happer]

Sodium. So if you go to 100 km, the earth is plowing through the dust of the solar system. And so we're constantly burning up little micrometeorites and they're all loaded with sodium atoms, and so they get released into the upper atmosphere, and they stay there and make a layer that's about 10 kilometers thick. And not many people know about that. I happen to know about it. And I knew you could use it, you know, for this method. That's why I got called to Washington, was making this. It was a highly secret invention for 10 years.

[Dick Lindzen]

Wow.

[Will Happer]

Yeah. When the Soviet Union collapsed, then this was declassified, thanks to the effort of a Livermore friend and colleague, Claire Max, a woman physicist, astronomer. But they. She finally persuaded the Department of Defense to declassified it. So if you go to any big telescope now around the world, it has one of these sodium lasers. You're pointing up at the sky at night, you'll see this bright yellow beam going up.

[Joe Rogan]

Oh, wow. Yeah, right there.

[Will Happer]

Oh, there it is. Yeah. Wow. Yeah, that's. And so the point where they come. This is actually green light. And so for the sodium. Most of them are yellow for sodium, but that's the basic idea.

[Joe Rogan]

And so this was a difficult thing to discuss in academia.

[Will Happer]

Well, I couldn't discuss. It was highly classified, so I couldn't even mention it until about 1995, I think. 94 or 95 when it was declassified. But I'd invented it, you know, 12 years earlier.

[Dick Lindzen]

But, you know, the point was, in academia, you could not discuss.

[Will Happer]

You couldn't discuss working for defense of the country. That was, you know, somehow immoral defending the country. I wasn't trying to attack Russia. I was trying to defend ourselves. Right, yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

That's a ridiculous position to take. We don't need defense against missiles.

[Will Happer]

You know, they're hard to defend against. But that doesn't mean you shouldn't try.

[Dick Lindzen]

Exactly. I mean, at mit, you had all sorts of people saying, you know, you shouldn't try, it's silly, it's impossible, and so on. What was the point of that? I mean, you have a problem, you try and solve it.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah, it seems like that's what science is supposed to be for.

[Dick Lindzen]

No, it's. If you probe, I think, into these issues, you realize that climate is an extreme case, but politics interfacing. Science is not new.

[Joe Rogan]

Well, it just seems like human behavior. Human behavior and anything else. It's like the same patterns. You'll find them in big businesses. You find them in a lot of different. You find them in almost all communities and groups of human beings. There's people that get into control and they force certain narratives. And the fact that that happens with the highest levels of academia and with science though is really confusing to people like myself that are counting on everybody like you to get it right.

[Will Happer]

Whereas much part of the crooked timber of mankind as anyone else.

[Joe Rogan]

Such a great quote.

[Dick Lindzen]

I've often mentioned. I mean my family emigrated here from Germany 38. But when Hitler came to power in 33, every university in Germany got rid of everyone who had Jewish blood before Hitler even asked. So universities are not bastions of independent thinking.

[Sponsor/Ad Reader]

What could be done to make them more so?

[Dick Lindzen]

You know, the Canadians did something that I thought had potential. Every faculty member, especially junior faculty, faculty immediately got grants that they didn't have to apply for. And so in that system, every one of their faculty could function as a research scientist. You know, students were paid for otherwise and at least one link in the chain of influence was broken. Broken. You had an open system there. Even there though, other pressures came to bear. But you know, it seemed like a good idea or at least a better idea. Yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

But again, unfortunately, it just seems like that just pattern of human behavior just pops its ugly head up over and over and over again.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yep.

[Will Happer]

You know, Joe Dick just gave up. You know, it's worth going back to the founding of this country because if you read the things like the Federalist Papers, which was the theory of our government, what comes through loud and clear was that our founders believed that humans were extremely corrupt and you know, not very reliable. And given that, that how do you make a system that will function even with that? And that's what they tried to do. You know, that was the whole reason for the balance of power and all the things that are in there. And so, you know, it was partially successful. It certainly worked better than other systems for a long time.

[Joe Rogan]

Better than all the other ones. Yeah. But it's amazingly astute.

[Will Happer]

Yeah, yeah.

[Dick Lindzen]

Fed us papers. I mean, they've held up well.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah. Anything else to add before we wrap this up, gentlemen? Is there anything else you think people should know?

[Will Happer]

Well, trust but verify.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah, I mean, how shall I put it? Destroying the world is not an easy thing to do. It shouldn't be the top of your list of worries.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah. You mean destroying the world with climate change? Yeah, it's not really what it is and it's very over magnified.

[Will Happer]

Absolutely.

[Dick Lindzen]

I mean, how should I put it? Its origins were almost entirely political. I often find it strange that one talks about the science at all. You know, we're discussing, you know, can it happen? Is this, is it warming Is it cooling? Is extreme weather increasing policing? It's amazing to me that politicians can put forward a concept that is purely imaginary and have the science community discuss it seriously.

[Joe Rogan]

I wonder how it would have worked if it wasn't for An Inconvenient Truth, if that movie hadn't been made. Because sometimes people need something like that, and that's sort of a form for it to really take hold as an idea.

[Dick Lindzen]

You may be right. I mean, something was needed to make it catch on. It had been around for quite a few years without catching on quite that way. But there's also the confluence. You know, the UN really got interested in it. You had the World Meteorological Organization, all of them saw something they could gain in it. And so it began to seem almost overwhelming. But it did, you know, it reached the right people. I mean, the funding agencies. The NSF got taken over almost immediately. NASA took about 10 years, Department of Energy took 10 years, but they worked on it.

[Joe Rogan]

It's kind of stunning, at least from the outside. You know, from my perspective, it's kind of stunning. It's stunning how successful it is. And again, like I said, if you're in polite company and you have a conversation and someone brings up, well, we've got to do something about climate change, the record skips, like, how much do you know?

[Will Happer]

Right.

[Joe Rogan]

It turns out very little, most people, and then it turns out, according to you, it's almost impossible to figure out anyway. The actual.

[Dick Lindzen]

I mean, the notion that there's a crisis has taken hold, even though nobody sees evidence of a crisis.

[Joe Rogan]

And the main movie that started off that crisis from 2006 is entirely wrong.

[Dick Lindzen]

All of its predictions and what's supporting it now is the extreme weather, which is a fake, but it provides visuals.

[Joe Rogan]

Yeah, it's very hard for people to swallow, but I encourage them to look at the data of hurricanes historically and you realize, like, oh, pretty stable. It's up and down and all over the place. But it's not any worse now than it has been before.

[Dick Lindzen]

Oh, I mean, growing up in the Bronx in the 40s, every autumn there were hurricanes. You could wake up in the morning, the streets were lined with the trees that had been blown down. Interestingly enough, that has not recurred in New York for about 30 years, 40, 50 years.

[Joe Rogan]

I think the last one I remember when I lived in Boston was Gloria. Yeah, yeah, they don't get hit by hurricanes anymore. If they did, they'd freak out climate change.

[Dick Lindzen]

But then 38 was a gigantic hurricane and I was born in a town on A lake. Lake in New Massachusetts called Lake Chaggmund. Chagagshibunaga.

[Joe Rogan]

That's the real name?

[Dick Lindzen]

Yes, that's a real name. But at any rate, in that lake were a couple of islands that were created by the hurricane of 1938. Justin. Really? Yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

Wow.

[Dick Lindzen]

But that also killed a lot of people because we didn't have. Have the information of it coming.

[Joe Rogan]

Right. And I'm sure buildings weren't really designed to withstand those either.

[Dick Lindzen]

No, I mean, if. How shall I put it? I'm glad it came then, not now. I suppose if it came now, it would be proof.

[Joe Rogan]

Right.

[Will Happer]

Actually, the worst hurricane on record on the east coast was the last year of the American Revolution, and it had a big impact on winning the war. What happened was this enormous hurricane, mostly in the Caribbean, but it wiped out the British fleet. It wiped out the French fleet. There was nothing left. You know, really, it was just tremendous hurricane. And so the reason it affected the war was the British just assumed that the French were incapable of restoring their fleet, so that when Cornwallis decided to try and escape from the Carolinas up into Virginia to the British fleet to be rescued, you know, with all of the partisans coming after him, he didn't worry about the French. But the French had managed to rebuild their fleet after the hurricane. They had had 12 months, and they had enough ships that they were able to barricade the mouth of the Chesapeake. And when Cornwallis got there, he was trying. Trapped, because he could. The British couldn't come in to rescue him, you know, from Rhode island or wherever they were. And so he had no choice. He had to surrender.

[Joe Rogan]

Wow.

[Will Happer]

That was the end of the war. And we can thank the hurricane for making that happen so neatly, as well as the French, the French, and the French. God bless the French. Yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

What are the warmest years on historical record in terms of, like, recent years?

[Will Happer]

34, 35.

[Joe Rogan]

What was it like then?

[Will Happer]

It was in the peak of the Dust bowl, and it was, I don't know, several degrees warmer than. I don't know the exact figure, but you can look at the records, they're pretty clear.

[Dick Lindzen]

Yeah. It's, you know, you're not going to see gigantic numbers. But again, that global metric is a little bit confusing locally. It was a huge effect.

[Joe Rogan]

But it globally. Yeah. What you're saying completely makes sense. It doesn't make sense to try to have a global temperature unless you're studying other planets.

[Will Happer]

Yeah, yeah.

[Joe Rogan]

What matters is where people live.

[Will Happer]

Right.

[Joe Rogan]

What's the temperature there?

[Will Happer]

Yeah, right, right.

[Joe Rogan]

Well, listen, gentlemen, I really appreciate your bravery and talking about this stuff and sharing all this information. Hope for the best, Lightning. Yeah, it really. It helps. These kind of conversations, they move the needle. They really do. So I really appreciate you guys.

[Will Happer]

Thank you.

[Joe Rogan]

Thanks for being here. I really enjoyed it.

[Dick Lindzen]

Thank you.

[Joe Rogan]

Bye, everybody.