B (23:46)
Welcome back. So Iran already is and is going to be an issue in the midterms this fall. At this point, it is imperative that Donald Trump Republicans simply just own That I see, I see a lot of folks saying that this is a bad hill, that Republicans are going to get crushed on this issue. Well, with all due respect, that should have been taken into consideration prior to the commencement of the operation. These are the things that you think through prior to commencing a gargantuan, massive, massive bombing campaign of a deeply hostile Islamist regime. So too when it comes to energy, when it comes to oil, a lot of folks saying that, that the United States, Donald Trump, oh, he didn't think through the Iranians were going to shut down the street reform. It was really literally every single war game, every single war game involving the Pentagon and various other military planners involving Iran, every war game involving a simulated standoff between the United States and Iraq. The Iranians first move is to cut off the Strait of Hormuz. So I'm not buying this garbage that Donald Trump's administration did not think this through. Of course they thought this through. They thought through all of it there. Now, as far as what it means specifically when it comes to, to Kharg island, when it comes to two various other natural gas oil facilities there, a lot of this is kinetic. It's a very fluid situation. It's war, for God's sake. It is very case by case, day by day, frankly, minute by minute, minute or second by second there. But the commander in chief fundamentally knows what he is doing because unlike Barack Obama and Joe Biden, as we were saying a few minutes ago, he fundamentally understands that there is a crucial distinction here between means and ends, between enunciate end goals and tactics. And as long as he remains focused, as long as he remains focused on the end goal, on the actual end goal here and not the tactics, that I think all is going to be okay. The rumor for now, for what it's worth, the rumor for now is that the US And Iran might actually sit down at a table, might sit down at a table as soon as potentially later this week. Again, these are all rumors that are happening right now. They're saying the summit could be in Pakistan, which is an interesting place, I guess, for lack of a better word, for hosting this possible summit. The rumor that I saw is that JD Vance could potentially be the US Representative at this summit, which is somewhat of a more defensive posture for the United States. If so, given the fact that Politico had this, this leaked story that he was the most skeptical voice in the room, perhaps unsurprisingly, when it came to the Iran operation there, so there are some potentially, potentially less than aggressive signs you might say from the administration there. But fundamentally, the commander in chief here, I continue to think really, really does know what he is doing. Earlier today at that same press gaggle, when Trump was at Dover Air Base ready to board the plane, Memphis, Tennessee, at some point, a reporter asked him him about the possibility of a deal with Iran. And Trump basically said that they're going to agree because, quote, otherwise we'll just keep bombing our little hearts out. You know, maybe that's playing a little too cute by half when it comes to dropping bombs and military, after all these, these are life and death matters there. But as long as that sentiment remains, what is guiding the operation right now, I think that all is going to be okay here when it comes to the Iran theater now, bringing it closer to home, the other geopolitical issue that we're really starting to follow here on the show is the issue of Cuba. Cuba had essentially a nationwide blackout about a week ago last Sunday. So two seconds ago into last Monday, one week ago, the entire nation was facing a large scale blackout. All 10 million to 11 million Cubans had some degree of blackout there. This has to do with the fact that the United States is essentially blocking the Cuban regime, the failed communist dictatorship, from taking in Venezuelan oil and various other forms of oil as well. The US has been trying to obstruct Russian oil gains of Cuba and various other things as well there. So all of this has led to the latest Greta Thunberg stunt. And it's actually not just Greta Thunberg. So a bunch of just utterly asinine leftists. And yes, there actually are a bunch of them are on this new, this new convoy. They're calling it the Nuestra America convoy. I mean, these are limousine liberal champagne socialists. Use your analogy of choice if there ever were one. So it's Greta Thunberg. It's Hasan Piker, the absolutely disgusting, loathsome left wing streamer and podcaster, a man who would have fit in quite well with the Hitler Youth back in the 1930s due to his just over the top unapologetic Jew hatred, among other just exceedingly awful things that he says and does. The daughter of Ilhan Omar is actually on this trip. Members of Code Pink, which United States intelligence has ascertained at various times is a, at least a Chinese Communist Party sympathetic organization there. A lot of folks say there are closer than just Smithies, that there actually are some coordinated messaging tactics, things like that happening between Code Pink as well. So they all basically are on this convoy and they're staying actually at these Five star lavish hotels in Havana and it's all just a big PR stunt. They're there in Cuba, in communist Cuba. A place that I've seen with my own eyes. It stinks. Cuba stinks. Now the, the nature is gorgeous, the hills, the rivers, the ocean and it's Ernest Hemingway. Only on the sea, it's beautiful. I remember when I was walking around Havana, Cuba when I, when I was there seven years ago now, just for four or five days or so, you see this and you think, oh my God, this is gorgeous. In theory there should be hotels and there should be this and that and restaurants and beach and luxury condos, casinos if you're into that kind of thing. We're not really into that here on the show, but like that kind of stuff that, that should be there and sure. What does Havana actually look like? It looks like a bomb went off. It looks like Al Anbar province, Iraq, circa 2006 at the height of the Petraeus counterinsurge. It looks like a bomb went off in the middle of the city. There's stray dogs, there's skeletal looking people who look they haven't had a proper meal in weeks or months. So now you have these posh left wing quote unquote influencers there while the regime is on the brink of destruction. They are begging Raul Castro, the 94 year old revolutionary, Fidel Castro's brother, who is the titular symbolic head. There's an acting day to day quote unquote president as well, something of a Potemkin president and name only. They have both confirmed that they were actually talking with Marco Rubio and the Department of State when it comes to trying to get some sort of off ramp to the United States economic embargo on Cuba that we have had in place now for literally almost 70 years. The regime in Cuba is on its freaking knees. This is potentially its last breaths, its last hours. And these idiots, these absolute idiots, these moral putrid, ah, little piece of garbage. Hasan Piker Greta Thunberg, Illinois Mars daughter Codepenk. They're there trying to symbolically or potentially even literally bail them out. So they're staying in all these five star hotels. This stupid Irish band Kneecap actually played a concert. There's all these images coming out of them, traveling in these air conditioned buses all while the country has no ac. The country's blackout, there's no power, there's barely any electricity whatsoever. So the hypocrisy is just utterly through the roof. And they're there and they're saying free Cuba. F. Trump F. Netanyahu. I mean, as if the Middle east has anything to do with your pregamen guys. I mean you guys willfully impose communism yourselves. So don't blame the Middle east frankly for, for your problems at home. And again, these images are just nuts. There's, the whole stage is totally black down Havana and these guys are just in these air conditioned buses, Flagstar Hotels. Hasan Piker again, the scum that he is actually, actually affirming, yet he actually admitted that he's breaking the law. This is kind of another funny twist to this whole story. So Hasan Piker went on a stream. Much of the stream is from Cuba or elsewhere. I've been to Cuba, trust me, the Internet is really, really, really terrible. Something you probably could stream a show from there. Maybe he's got some fancy Internet at these py hotels. Because Hasan pike actually saying in one of these live streams, this Hamas loving socialist nincompoop says, quote, the government makes it illegal for us to stay where we want in Cuba. We have to stay in five star hotels. So as a guy by the name of Gabe Hoffman, who's a finance guy working in Palm beach, as he correctly points out, Hasan Piker is literally admitting that he is breaking American law. So there's a thing called the United States State Department's Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List. You can literally look it up for yourself@state,state.gov Cuba sanctions and then it's the Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List. There's a whole link, there's a whole page for this there and I'm just going to read a snippet of it. Below is the U.S. department of State's Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List, a list of properties in Cuba at which the Cuban Assets Control Regulations generally prohibit persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction from lodging, paying for lodging or making any reservation where. So you can't stay there, you can't stay at these hotels. And there's a whole list, a long, long list. A very, very long list actually. So these five star hotels are, are there? I mean, dude is literally admitting that he's breaking the law. So holding aside the fifth column subversion, when these guys return to the United States, how about we have US Coast Guard interdict them before they actually arrive at a dock or a port because they violated the law or at least have the FBI possible charges, recommend charges to a U.S. attorney. These guys are literally breaking the law. So that's another quite humorous twist to this story in frankly one that I hope some of these attorneys take up, take us up on sooner rather than later because it would be a really, really fun and indeed a noble thing to do as well. Folks, one final commercial break. Stay with us. We'll be right back with some final thoughts on the other side. Welcome back. So it was actually oral argument day at the US Supreme Court earlier today. The case being argued earlier today is a case out of the of Mississippi called Watson versus rnc, Republican National Committee. Now, if you follow case style guides closely, you might be a little confused here. Why is there a versus RNC out of a very, very red state like Mississippi? Well, what actually happened here is that there is a state law, there is a state law in Mississippi, in the Magnolia State that essentially says that a ballot, so a mail in ballot that is postmarked, that has the correct postmark on or before election day, but is actually received, so received by the local election office or whoever is tabulating and counting ballots is received after the election day. Is that okay? Is that permissible or does that violate one of numerous federal laws? So the rnc, again, it's very interesting because it's actually a Republican state, your Republican governor, they're all Republicans in Mississippi there. They are actually now in litigation with the RNC because the RNC is now defending these federal statutes, saying that these federal statutes preempt, which means that the regulations and the way that two US Code Section seven, two, US Code Section one and three is Code Section one. All of these federal statutes essentially preempt and prevent the states from legislating in this exact arena for what's worth, the U.S. government. So John Sauer, who is our exceptional solicitor general, he is actually intervening on behalf of the rnc. So basically have the RNC for what the excellent lawyer Paul Clement argued earlier today. You have Paul Clement for the RNC and then John Sauer for the US Government, essentially against Scott Stewart, the Solicitor General of Mississippi. So it's basically a very it's a very interesting conservative versus conservative type of litigation. Scott Stewart, the solicitor General of Mississippi, had a miraculous victory four terms ago in the Dobbs case. He actually was the winning lawyer to overturn Roe versus Wade. So do not discount Scott Stewart if you are counting your legal aches of home. As far as the actual issue is concerned here, it's somewhat of a technical preemption analysis there. There's all sorts of methods that lawyers have devised for whether to determine whether or not Congress has clearly spoken in a manner so as to preclude the states from doing so. It's somewhat of a strong argument from the rnc, to be honest with you. And by strong, I don't necessarily mean strong on the merits. It definitely has some merit for sure. But it's an aggressive argument because the overarching constitutional assumption is that the way of choosing the regulations, manners and times and procedures for elections, as article in the Constitution very clearly says, are determined by the states. So this lawsuit with the RNC leading it is actually very similar to the Save America act insofar as Republicans and the Trump administration and their allies at the RNC are now trying to assume a greater role, a greater role for elections. Your mileage may vary as to whether or not that is a good thing. Surely there is only so far that that states can go. We absolutely need some some uniformity here. My own personal $0.02 on this, especially dealing with the whole mail in ballot, voter ID debates and the whole election Day versus Election month debate thing. I happen to think that that that early voting is absolutely terrible. Early voting is garbage. Why? Because it literally defeats the purpose of holding a national election day. Election day is Election Day and not election week or election Month. Because it is a snapshot in time. Think about the 2016 election. You could have cast your ballots a month and a half in advance and you wouldn't have known about that stupid Billy Bush NBC video. Donald Trump Graham by the what? Or for a more pro Trump counter to that, think about the 2020 election. How about if you would cast a month for Joe Biden and Kamala if you cast a ballot a month before the election for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and then oh wait, then oh wait, the Hunter Biden laptop comes about there. In fact mrc, the Media Research center did a poll at the time and showed I forgot the exact number but something like 15 to 18% give or take of Biden Harris voters said and they the same as was Biden Harris voters who did not know about the Hunter Biden laptop scandal. They said that if they had known about it they would have voted for Trump. So early voting defeats the purpose of voting. Voting is a snapshot in time. It is a straight up thumbs up, thumbs down referendum when there is an incumbent running. When it's an open slate, there's a two way thumbs up, thumbs down announce going on there. But it's not supposed to be a moving target. It is literally a snapshot. It is not the kind of thing that you have months and months and months to to to make up your minds. You have a whole season taking information. Make it make up your mind there and then you cast your freaking ballot on election day so my proposed solution to this, which I've been saying for years now, is very straightforward. Democrats for as long as I've been alive want to make Election Day a national holiday. Republicans want to minimize early voting, mail in voting and all of the above. My very easy solution, proposed solution here, and it's a very straightforward one, is to do both. Let's we on the right, conservatives concede to liberals concede to Democrats. Let's make Election Day federal holiday. It's fine. It's ideal. Probably not. I mean, it's America, free enterprise. We want business to be running stock market. Okay, blah, blah, blah. Okay, fine, let's give them that. And in exchange for that, Democrats are going to have to concede that there will be no early voting or mail in voting except for XYZ exceptions. There always will be dispensations. Exceptions to a rule rule active service, active duty, military, obviously overseas, if you're physically bedridden, a hospital there. There will always be some specified dispensations. And a lot of the congressional debate will get hashed out there when it comes to the exact nature of what those dispensations will be. But that's the, that's the basic overview of the proposed compromise. It's very much a quid pro quo. Give Democrats what they want when it comes to making Election Day a national holiday. Then give Republicans what they want in turn about minimizing, severely minimizing mail in voting and early voting. Frankly, I think that would go a very, very long way towards solving our election problems. In the meantime, fascinating argument, let's say at the U.S. supreme Court in this Watson vs. RNC case, this very much conservative intramural skirmish between Paul Clement and John Sauer on the one hand and Scott Stewart on the other hand there. And we will see ultimately who gets the better of the argument. I, I think I like the federal government's odds, but frankly, it's a somewhat technical case there and we'll see which way it blows. Now, in other news, to round out today's show, I was somewhat struck by a clip that I saw on the show of our Salem colleague Aaron Milan, who was wonderful. I love Aaron. And Aaron will be guest here on the Josh Hammer show very soon as well. So this clip that I saw on Aaron's show, which I was pre struck by, was my friend Rabbi Pesach Wolicki, who was also a recent guest here on the Josh Hammer Show. Actually, Rabbi Wolicki lives over in Israel and Rabbi Wolicki and I have multiple things in common but among the things that we have in common is that we were both in this somewhat infamous WhatsApp chat that Charlie Kirk had started for purposes of trying to secure Jewish Christian relations, US Israel relations, amidst all this rising nonsense and rising Jew hated hatred. And this was a chat that was infamously leaked, infamously leaked to Candace Owens and Rabbi Wolicki, saying to ER Milan that we can now verify that it was Joe Kent who did this leaking. So it was Andrew Colvett, who was Charlie's longtime right hand guy. Now Andrew's one of the hosts of the Charlie Kirk show. Andrew has actually publicly admitted that these screenshots came from him. And when Andrew told us, including me, was that he did so before they actually apprehended Tyler Robinson. Because he wanted no stone unturned, he gave them to what he said was some senior high ranking intelligence or counterterrorism officials. I forgot the exact language. This was our phone call from now, months ago at this point and we can now confirm and they won't allow our details. But it is now beyond a shadow of a doubt. The person that Andrew sent those texts to was Joe Kent. Which means that Joe Kent sent those messages he leaked to Candace Owens. Disgusting. Disgusting stuff. Donald Trump was asked about Joe Kent earlier today and did not have kind things to say. Here was President Trump.