The Big Fight: MAGA Fascist Camps & The Texas Steal | The Joy Reid Show LIVE! Aug 01, 2025

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Joy Reid Show Episode: The Big Fight: MAGA Fascist Camps & The Texas Steal | The Joy Reid Show LIVE! Aug 01, 2025
Host: Joy-Ann Reid
Release Date: August 2, 2025

---

Introduction

In this electrifying episode of The Joy Reid Show, host Joy-Ann Reid delves deep into some of the most pressing and controversial issues facing America today. From the Epstein cover-up and Trump's alleged manipulations to the emerging People's Sick Day movement and redistricting battles in Texas, Reid brings insightful analysis, compelling discussions, and confrontational interviews with key figures fighting against systemic injustices.

---

1. Epstein Cover-Up and Trump's Involvement

Joy-Ann Reid opens the episode by addressing the ongoing investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's death, suggesting a potential cover-up involving high-profile figures, including former President Donald Trump.

• CBS News Analysis: Reid cites a CBS News report by Scott McFarlane, highlighting footage from Epstein's federal prison showing suspicious activity that contradicts official accounts.

  "The footage begins at 7:40pm the night before Epstein's death... Despite the official report... you don't actually see Epstein ascend the stairwell to his cell block." (02:28)

• Dan Bongino's Input: Conservative commentator Dan Bongino adds to the intrigue by pointing out the inconsistencies in the footage.

  "There's video clear as day. He's the only person in there and the only person coming out. You can see it." (03:09)

• Forensic Analysis: Reid references forensic psychologist Dr. John Paul Garrison's concerns about the discrepancies in prisoner counts and the mysterious orange blob observed in the surveillance video.

  "The prisoner account in the official record that night was 73 with plus one written in hand when there were actually only 72 prisoners in the facility that night." (05:02)

• Redaction of Trump's Name: Further complicating the narrative, Bloomberg reports that Trump's name has been redacted from Epstein's files, raising questions about transparency and accountability.

  "FBI investigators blacked out Trump's name along with the names of other high profile figures, claiming that the information constituted an unwarranted invasion of privacy."

---

2. Ghislaine Maxwell's Legal Battles

Reid shifts focus to Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's co-conspirator, who is appealing her conviction.

• Jeffrey Epstein's Finances: Reid emphasizes Epstein's extensive financial networks, mentioning figures like Les Wexner and Leon Black, and highlighting Senate Majority Leader Ron Wyden's revelations about Epstein's massive wire transfers.

  "Treasury's EPSTEIN File details, Mr. President. 4,725 wire transfers. ... used multiple Russian banks... to process payments related to sex." (08:08)

---

3. The People's Sick Day Movement

A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to the People's Sick Day, a grassroots movement founded by Casey McManus and Caress Marie, aiming to challenge systemic injustices through collective action.

• Founders' Vision: McManus and Marie discuss their initiative to encourage Americans to take three sick days simultaneously to exert economic pressure.

  "We're asking Americans to utilize their sick time as a way to fight back." (16:26)

• Demands for Change: The movement has a comprehensive list of demands, including the removal and arrest of Donald Trump for violating the U.S. Constitution.

  "We want to see Donald Trump removed, arrested for his egregious act against the U.S. constitution." (17:54)

• Strategic Planning: Marie explains the strategic use of social media to organize and build momentum, aiming for a significant impact on the economy to force political change.

  "We have a list of demands... after the three days, we expect someone to sit down and have a conversation with us, the American people, the American workforce." (17:54)

• Future Actions: The founders plan to announce the dates through their Discord server and Facebook group once sufficient momentum is achieved.

  "We are going to give a 48 hour notice when we are ready to go." (25:06)

---

4. Human Rights Violations and International Legal Perspectives

Reid engages in a critical discussion with Professor Harold Koh, Sterling Professor of International Law at Yale Law School, regarding the United States' potential scrutiny by international legal institutions.

• ICE Detention Centers: Reid describes harrowing conditions reported in ICE detention centers, comparing them to concentration camps.

  "Living in filth, eating rotten food... being forced to eat out of a bowl on the floor."

• International Courts Feasibility: Koh discusses the challenges of bringing the U.S. before the International Criminal Court (ICC) or the International Court of Justice (ICJ) due to jurisdictional limitations.

  "The United States is not a party to the ICC... It's very hard to claim that it's a genocide." (36:46)

• Legal Strategies: Koh emphasizes the importance of pursuing domestic legal avenues to challenge these human rights violations, citing existing lawsuits challenging detention practices.

  "The best approach to counter Trump's strategy at this point is a unified legal strategy involving both domestic and legal claims." (37:51)

• Court's Potential Stance: Despite skepticism about the U.S. Supreme Court's current composition, Koh remains cautiously optimistic about future rulings.

  "He [Chief Justice Roberts] is skeptical of the notion that that court should be viewed as a pawn of this administration." (33:55)

---

5. Gerrymandering and Redistricting in Texas

The latter part of the episode focuses on the contentious redistricting efforts in Texas, with guest Representative Al Green, a liberal Democrat, shedding light on the racial implications of the new maps.

• Racist Intentions in Redistricting: Green criticizes the Republican-led redistricting plans as overtly racist, aiming to dilute minority voting power.

  "President Trump is using race and that we are responding to it." (41:20)

• Manipulation of Political Boundaries: Discussion centers around how new districts are being drawn to favor Republican candidates by combining majority minority districts into fewer, predominantly white districts.

  "Combining them together... five Republican districts instead." (50:41)

• Media's Role and Challenges: Green laments the media's reluctance to label these actions as racism, hindering effective public discourse and accountability.

  "You can use racism against people of color, but people of color can't respond and say that's racism." (46:55)

• Historical Context and Future Implications: Green draws parallels to past discriminatory practices like white primaries and emphasizes the need for vigilant activism to combat ongoing racial injustices.

  "Texas is a state that consistently tries as best as it can to suppress the votes of minority people." (52:10)

• Call to Action: Representative Green urges listeners to recognize the systemic racism embedded in political maneuvers and to actively participate in democratic processes to ensure fair representation.

  "We've got to say it and we've got to fight with those tools that make the difference." (52:12)

---

6. Closing Remarks and Future Directions

Joy-Ann Reid wraps up the episode by reinforcing the themes of resistance against fascism and racism, encouraging listeners to stay engaged and proactive in seeking justice and equality.

• Encouragement for Active Participation: Reid emphasizes the importance of community, unity, and continuous struggle against oppressive systems.

  "We are living, unfortunately, in autocracy and apartheid, and we have to fight it like Representative Green fights." (55:19)

• Promotion of Future Content: She invites listeners to subscribe and participate in upcoming premium content, fostering a sense of belonging and shared mission within her audience.

---

Notable Quotes

• Joy Reid:

  "The sole purpose of this Trump regime is to allow Donald Trump to achieve his lifelong dreams... while erasing every negative thing from his past." (00:49)

• Casey McManus:

  "The federal minimum wage has been $7.25. It has not changed since mid-2009. That is an issue." (19:35)

• Representative Al Green:

  "We need to march on. If they could fight racism by walking into billy clubs and people on horses, surely we can fight it by announcing it and saying it." (54:37)

---

Conclusion

This episode of The Joy Reid Show serves as a potent exploration of current sociopolitical battles in America. Joy-Ann Reid skillfully navigates through complex topics, providing her audience with critical insights and rallying calls for activism. Whether dissecting high-profile scandals, championing grassroots movements, or confronting systemic racism in political structures, Reid ensures that her listeners are both informed and empowered to effect meaningful change.

---

Timestamp References:

• 00:49 – Introduction by Joy Reid
• 02:28 – Scott McFarlane’s CBS Report
• 03:09 – Dan Bongino’s Commentary
• 05:02 – Dr. John Paul Garrison’s Analysis
• 08:08 – Ron Wyden’s Senate Statement
• 16:26 – People’s Sick Day Introduction
• 17:54 – Demands and Future Plans
• 19:35 – Casey McManus on Minimum Wage
• 21:06 – Impact of ICE Detentions on Economy
• 25:06 – People’s Sick Day Scheduling
• 33:55 – Professor Koh on Supreme Court’s Stance
• 36:46 – International Court Jurisdiction Issues
• 37:51 – Legal Strategies Against Trump’s Policies
• 41:20 – Al Green on Gerrymandering
• 46:55 – Al Green on Media’s Handling of Racism
• 50:41 – Gerrymandering Tactics Explained
• 52:10 – Texas’ History of Voter Suppression
• 52:12 – Call to Fight Invidious Discrimination
• 54:37 – Joy Reid’s Final Thoughts
• 55:19 – Closing Remarks

---

This summary encapsulates the key discussions and insights from the August 1, 2025 episode of The Joy Reid Show, providing a comprehensive overview for those who missed the live broadcast.

Transcript

[LifeLock Advertiser]

This episode is brought to you by LifeLock. Between two factor authentication, strong passwords and a VPN, you try to be in control of how your info is protected. But many other places also have it and they might not be as careful. That's why LifeLock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats. If your identity is stolen, they'll fix it, guaranteed, or your money back. Save up to 40% your first year. Visit lifelock.com podcast for 40% off. Terms apply.

[Joy Reid]

All right, all right, all right. Thank you all for holding on. And good evening, everybody. Happy Friday. Woo. Happy Friday. And don't worry, all the people in the chat, nobody came and got me. Don't worry, we're good. You don't have to call out the anti fascist forces to come and find me. We are here. Good evening, everybody. Welcome to the Joy Reid Show. Happy Friday. And welcome to everybody that's taking in this show on YouTube and substack. Hey. Hello to everyone in the chat, as well as all our friends on Spotify. Thank y' all for supporting independent media and this show. We love you. We love you, we love you. And if you are not yet a subscriber and you're just lurking around checking us out tonight, it is not too late. You can subscribe right now for free by hitting the subscribe button and also the little notification bell thingy, which ensures that you will never miss an episode. Okay, now let me get to a few headlines, starting with the Epstein cover up, which now appears to be in full swing. CBS News has a blockbuster new report that proves that the Trump regime has been lying, not surprisingly, about Jeffrey Epstein's last night alive. A CBS analysis of footage from the federal prison where the world's most notorious pedophile was being housed shows what appears to be a figure in orange going up the stairs. Despite the official report from Trump's first Attorney General, William Barr, son of the man who first hired Epstein as a math teacher at an exclusive private school in New York, claiming that no one, no one except a woman security guard went up those stairs before Trump's bestie for 15 years was found strangled to death in his cell on August 10, 2019. Now here's some of that report from CBS's Scott McFarlane, an excellent journalist, by the way. Now, it's about two and a half minutes long. And here it is.

[Scott McFarlane]

The footage begins at 7:40pm the night before Epstein's death. You can see staff and inmates moving about, preparing for the nightly lockdown. That's the officer station in the Background. Only two employees have been publicly identified. Tova Noel, a corrections officer pulling a double shift that began at 4pm and and Michael Thomas, a materials handler who won't arrive until midnight. Epstein is seen for the first and only time on camera at 7:49pm when the Department of justice said he was escorted to his cell from another wing of the unit. It's important to note here you don't actually see Epstein ascend the stairwell to his cell block. Remember what Dan Bongino said.

[Dan Bongino]

There's video clear as day. He's the only person in there and the only person coming out. You can see it.

[Scott McFarlane]

Lets zoom in and play that again in slow motion. Here's the sliver of stairs. Epstein is here with his escort. And they walk off screen. When the FBI released the video, they said anyone entering or attempting to enter the tier where Epstein's cell was located from the common area would have been captured by this footage. But with the primary entrance here, the pathway from the entrance to the stairs is completely out of view of the camera. For the next hour or so, corrections officers and inmates are seen moving about preparing for all prisoners to be locked down. At 8:21, another inmate is seen being escorted toward the stairs leading to Epstein's cell area. No movement is detected on the stairs. Again, by 8:24, all of the inmates appear to have been taken to their cells. Noel told the Inspector General she visited Epstein's cell at about 10pm you can see her head in that direction here, albeit closer to 10:30, but not climb the stairs. The rules require rounds to be made every 30 minutes, but according to the report, this was the only time anyone checked on the inmate night. There was even a sign printed on orange paper posted on the guard station saying mandatory rounds must be conducted every 30 minutes on Epstein, as per God. This was because of concerns about his risk for suicide. At 10:38pm the report says someone, probably Noel, carries a bundle of bedding or clothing up the stairs. It's a rare instance. The video does catch movement on the stairs, but barely. Let's see that zoomed in and in slow motion again. Several of the video forensic experts we spoke with were skeptical about the report's conclusion and thought that the video could be showing an inmate walking up the stairs. Authorities say this was the last time anyone approached his cell block until his body was discovered the next morning.

[Joy Reid]

Now I want you to know that the guards uniforms are black and the inmates uniforms are orange. What color was the blob that you saw in that little corner going up Those stairs, black or orange, you be the judge, you can see with your own eyes. Also suspicious, as pointed out by a forensic psychologist named Dr. John Paul Garrison, who hosts the Dr. G Explains channel right here on YouTube. The prisoner account in the official record that night was 73 with plus one written in hand handwritten on it, when there were actually only 72 prisoners in the facility that night. Now, I'm going to post a link to his video in the YouTube description for this video for this podcast and also on substackjoyannreid.com so you can watch the whole thing for yourself. It is definitely worth the watch. And the question is, was that little orange blob going up the stairs leading to Epstein's cell that 73rd potential inmate? And could we have actually now seen Epstein's killer on that surveillance video? The video plus the notorious one minute gap in the surveillance footage raises serious questions about whether somebody else was in that prison. Also dropping today is news that Trump's name has been redacted from the Epstein files. Now, you'll recall that in May, per reporting by the Wall Street Journal, Trump was informed by Attorney General Pam Bondi that his name appeared in the files that the FBI had compiled about Epstein. Well, apparently not anymore. According to Bloomberg, FBI investigators blacked out Trump's name along with the names of other high profile figures, claiming that the information constituted an unwarranted invasion of privacy. This as Epstein's co conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell, is about to take her case to the Roberts Court to try to overturn her conviction. And if you don't think this court, whose sole purpose is to protect the rich and the greedy from accountability, won't rule in a way that protects Trump and whatever other powerful men were hanging around Epstein, you have not been paying attention. And Maxwell will await the results of her Roberts appeal in a Camp Fed in Trump's second favorite state after Florida. NBC News confirming earlier today that Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney has confirmed that Maxwell has just been moved to a federal prison in Texas called FPC Bryant in Bryan, Texas, a minimum security federal prison camp for a woman alleged to have helped traffic maybe more than 100 little girls to Jeffrey Epstein. Nice. Maxwell was also offered a limited immunity deal from the DOJ when she met with them to talk about. We still don't know. And besides trafficking young girls, we keep getting more info about what else. Epstein, who got most of his billions from just two clients, Les Wexner, the late owner of Victoria's Secret, and Leon Black, who died earlier this year, whose investment firm, Apollo Global Management, was considered the king of Wall street vulture capitalists. I want you to listen to what Democratic Senator Ron Wyden had to say in the Senate chamber earlier this week.

[Ron Wyden]

Last year, the Biden administration allowed our investigators to look at portions of the file. We did that at the treasury building. Here is what it says. Treasury's EPSTEIN File details, Mr. President. 4,725 wire transfers. Let me repeat that. 4,725 wire transfers adding up to nearly $1.1 billion flowing in and out of just one of Mr. Epstein's bank accounts. If you ask me, that is more than 4,000 potential lines of investigation right there. Hundreds of millions more flowed through other accounts. That's even a lot more to investigate. The file shows that Mr. Epstein used multiple Russian banks, which are now under sanctions, to process payments related to sex.

[Joy Reid]

Trafficking, money power and sexual predation. Apparently a not so great American tradition that continues to this day. Which brings me to something that you need to understand about a lot of what you are seeing in the news in the last seven months since Donald Trump came back into power, and it is this. The sole purpose of this Trump regime is to allow Donald Trump to achieve his lifelong dreams, which he could not achieve using his own talents and abilities since he has so few, and to make the American people subsidize and pay for him to achieve those lifelong dreams, while erasing every negative thing from his past and his biography and promoting this new cleansed history as the truth. Hence erasing Trump's connection to his bestie of 15 years, pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, and the crimes that he committed, potentially with other rich and powerful men. But wait, there is more. The Republican Party is backing using your tax dollars to help Trump cover up his more nefarious acts and to achieve his lifelong dreams and fantasies. Because it's the perfect cover and distraction for what they want to do, which is to repeal the 20th century and take away all of the things birthed in that century that help non rich people, minorities and women. So you are going to pay to make Trump a billionaire through all these crypto schemes that are suddenly perfectly legal. You will pay to fly him around the world and promote his golf courses in Scotland and open new ones and get even richer. You will pay to upgrade the supposedly free luxury plane he got from Qatar, but which will now cost you $900 million, which they're going to take out of the budget for maintaining our nuclear arsenal, because who cares? Trump wants it. It Must be done. You will pay in higher grocery prices for Trump to get to run a live experiment on his longtime obsession with tariffs. He gets to play with our economy because he believes in tariffs, so he gets to try them out. And you have to pay so that he can claim that he's always known better than actual economists. You get to suffer to appease his ego. The Washington Post reports that Trump's two impeachments were erased from a Smithsonian exhibit also to appease Trump's ego, although once they were caught, they reportedly said, oh no, don't worry, we'll restore the reference to the truth. We'll see. Trump's phony feel good version of history with slavery deleted is already being implemented at our National Park Service sites, where instead visitors will learn about black full unemployment and the friendly agricultural trades at our nation's founding. And he's demanded that the offensive Indian disparaging names be restored to NFL teams, just as his joke of a defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, has slapped the names of Confederate traitors right back onto our military bases. A Republican congressman has floated a bill to steal the Kennedy center from the Kennedy family and turn it into the Trump Center. I promise you this is true. Naming it after Trump is if they haven't already crashed attendance and the income of the Kennedy center by more than 50% since their takeover. They're also gonna name the ballroom after the second immigrant that Trump married. You know, the one that he met at the Kit Kat Club back when he was besties with Epstein, who somehow got a genius visa for we don't know what. Trump and Stephen Miller hate brown and black immigrants. And apparently he's always wanted to be a dictator or, or a king, so why not let him have a secret police force so they can harass non white people for the entertainment of his fanatical base who get to dream collectively of creating an all white, all English speaking America where any non white people are quiet and subservient and obedient. And by the way, despite Republicans in Congress giving ICE a budget larger than the military budgets of every country on earth except the us, Russia and China, the regime still doesn't have enough sadists for the job. So now they're offering to cancel your student loan debt if you signed up to join the Trumpenwaffen and raid elementary schools and the Disneyland parking lot and Home Depots and restaurants to do the ethnic cleansing that Miller, Homan, Noem and Trump demand. But with the roundups now competing in the headlines with a concentration camp in Florida and Numerous private prisons with reportedly deplorable inhumane conditions being exposed in Florida. Plus the private prisons opening their gates in New Jersey, Louisiana, Texas, and other states to detain immigrants without hearings or due process. As well as political prisoners like Mahmoud Khalil and Ramessa Ozturk, who are getting arrested by the Trump secret police and detained for writing op eds protesting Israeli brutality against Palestinians. A key question is this. Are these human rights violations that could actually lead the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice to finally take notice of what Trump and complicit Republicans are turning us into? Namely, a kleptocracy married to an autocracy laced over with open fascism. We're going to talk to somebody, a professor from Yale, who's got perhaps an answer to that. But there's also the question of how in the hell we're supposed to fight back. Which leads me to our first guest. Joining me first up are two of the three founders of what's being called the People's Sick Day. We're gonna put the poster up for you. Casey McManus and Caress Marie. The People Sick Day. Casey McManus, labor and Caress Marie. The People's Sick Day. Social Labor. Stronger labor rights. Social programs. Ladies, welcome. And stronger labor rights rather than autocracy. Ladies, welcome. And I think one of you might have your sound up, so just one of your headphones so that we don't get a reverb up. So just listen through your headphones so that we don't get a re. Starting a business can seem like a daunting task unless you have a partner like Shopify. They have the tools you need to start and grow your business. From designing a website to marketing, to selling and beyond, Shopify can help with everything you need. There's a reason millions of companies like Mattel, Heinz and Allbirds continue to trust and use them. With Shopify on your side, turn your big business idea into sign up for your $1 per month [e-mail] specialoffer. Hi. Thanks so much for having me.

[Dan Bongino]

I think it's Casey. Could we.

[Joy Reid]

Casey? Yep, Go ahead. Casey. Just mute your microphone. Yeah. Mute your sound so that you're just listening in your headphones. That way we won't get a reverb from you. Perfect. Okay. Excellent. So thank you all for being here. We're not going to have Professor Koh yet. We're going to just have the two ladies. The professor's in the room, but we're not going to have him on yet. So Casey McManus and Caress Marie, talk to me about what the people's sick day is meant to be. Yeah. So the people sick day is working.

[Caress Marie]

Class Americans coming together, take a stand against what we were watching happening. We have decided that if the system doesn't serve us anymore, we will put a stop to it, because at the end of the day, we keep this country running.

[Joy Reid]

And so what does the. What are you asking people to do on the people sick day? Tell me exactly. Like, what does. What does it involve?

[Caress Marie]

Yeah, so we're asking Americans to utilize their sick time as a way to fight back. So we're asking everyone to collectively take three sick days off together. At the same time, we're asking for them to also participate in economic. We're asking for them to also participate in.

[Joy Reid]

And we're going to try to get Casey in, but I still think we're getting that echo, Casey, and unfortunately, I think that is coming from your computer. So we're going to get you to just listen in your headphones, and we're going to have you just mute any sound that's on your computer. And once we fix that, we're going to get Casey back in. But I'm gonna stay with you, Caress. How did you guys formulate this? Who else is involved?

[Caress Marie]

Yeah, so actually, we did this all through social media, which I think is like an incredible triumph that we brought all these people together through social media. So another creator, angel, one of the founders of the People Sick Day, she made a video and she said, what if we did this? I saw the video and I said, what if we did? And from there, we've collected people along the way. We are over 25,000 members strong as of today. We started on May 24th. So we've been collecting people through social media, using the platform to organize, to spread the message, and to get the word out.

[Joy Reid]

And what do you hope to achieve? Is this about denying the economy a certain sort of level of funding? Are you trying to reach a certain threshold in terms of the economic impact? And then what do you want the outcome to be after these three days? Then what?

[Caress Marie]

Yeah, so we do have a list of demands, and those lists of demands go all the way from the top, being we want to see Donald Trump removed, arrested for his egregious act against the U.S. constitution, which I know, Joy, I've watched your show, and you said that that's. It's impossible, but we've watched it happen. Just back in 2024, we just saw a president who was taken out of his seat because the people stood up. And I think that we very well are seeing that he is taking complete advantage of his seat. He's taking advantage of this US Constitution, not giving people due process. And. Yeah, but we have a list of demands. And after the three days, we expect someone to sit down and have a conversation with us, the American people, the American workforce.

[Joy Reid]

Let me get Casey McManus in. I think we've got you back in. Sans echo. Casey, thank you so much for being here. So we were just talking with Caress about the demand and you know, I have said removing Donald Trump is not realistic. I mean, we did see that happen in South Korea, but you had a very engaged populace that essentially took to the streets not for three days, but for weeks to demand that the president there be removed. And we have seen administration regimes overthrown by the people. It's absolutely something that has happened. But we're so early. We're seven months, Casey, into this autocracy and a lot of people still haven't woken up to the fact that it's on and autocracy at all. It's still not normal to call it fascist in mainstream media at this point. We're saying it a lot on social media, we're saying it a lot on places like YouTube, but it's still not normal to do it. So tell me what you think can be done by taking this sick day. What do you think realistically will be the outcome?

[Casey McManus]

I think realistically what we have been focusing on is the working class. I don't know if Chris said it because I was in and out, but one of the big things that for me personally, the federal minimum wage has been $7.25. It has not changed since mid-2009. That is an issue. Why has it been over? You know, it's been decades of this system grinding us and grinding us and, you know, 8.9 million people working multiple jobs because minimum wage is not going to cut it. So really for me personally, if we can get a $15 minimum wage federally, if we can help people who are not getting sick time or don't feel like they can use their sick time, help people that are working multiple jobs, that they can afford the day to day cost of living in this country, that's going to make me very happy.

[Joy Reid]

Casey, among the activists that you all talk to, have they processed the fact that mass deportation and mass detention, who, by the way, the targets of it are working class immigrants who are doing some of the working class job that keep the economy afloat, that detaining Those people, or even making them too afraid to go to work, actually is making that $7.25 have to stretch even further. It's making everything more expensive. It's closing businesses. Are people making the connection between mass deportation and, and mass detention and the economy?

[Casey McManus]

We have been trying. We have been actively trying to get people to connect those dots. I think people still don't understand that immigrants pay into, you know, taxes every single year. People still don't even want to understand that. And yes, we have people telling us, I'm afraid to go into work, I'm afraid to travel, I'm afraid to be here. And it's just so disheartening to hear because we're supposed to be the greatest country in the world. And look at where we're at right now. We need something like the people's sick day to take the power back and to stand up for the voices that are too afraid to speak out and caress.

[Joy Reid]

Were you aware of, and did you hear this sound bite when our Secretary of Agriculture said that there's an answer for our working class, that the 37 million Americans who take advantage of Medicaid because they pay taxes and deserve to have helped, making sure that they can have health care, that they need to work for their Medicaid by going into the field that they can replace the people who are being deported. Did you hear that? And what do you make of that? The idea that now the federal government is basically officially saying what we're going to do for the working class is put them in the fields.

[Caress Marie]

Well, what are they supposed to do with the jobs that they already hold? Because majority of them are. Majority of them already work right now. So what's going to happen to those jobs now? I did see that they also added that they want our children to start doing summer programs in agriculture programs. And they're. And they're actively doing that. Right. There was a. There was a conference here in the state of Texas where they brought all of ISD students who are in agricultural programs together to do work programs, framing it as blue collar work programs. You mean to tell me that you want our children to be the new migrants? That's what I see is happening. Right. And I think it's a slap in the face of the American people, and I think it's a slap in the face of the people who have worked so hard on this land to build this. And yeah, I think that Americans are working, are waking up to that. They're seeing what they're trying to do here. And we Are not. You can't bring people from jobs to go work in the field. That doesn't make any sense. What's going to happen there? Who's going to replace those people? AI Robotics? What's the plan?

[Joy Reid]

It does Casey seem to be a not well thought out, but an autocratic sort of tick right from the right. They've always hated Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security. So the idea for them is privatize Social Security so that Wall street can invest that money and get even richer. Wall street bankers like the late Leon Leo Black who used to work with Jeffrey Epstein. So they're like, privatize that. Privatize the post Office so that FedEx and UPS can get that money. And then if people are, you know, indigent or people are poor, just make them work more and make them pay all the taxes in sales taxes. And I just wonder if that message is really clear to the working class that the goal here is to return to something closer to slavery or indentured servitude because they genuinely believe that that was a better America.

[Casey McManus]

That yes, absolutely. That's the message that we've been trying to push is how much longer are we going to wait? How bad does it have to get? How much do we have to roll back on history? We talk about how we are compared to other countries. The EU has, you know, these things set up these safety nets if companies go under or, you know, they have a 48 hour cap on their work weeks. Why do other countries have these safety nets set in place and we don't?

[Joy Reid]

It's a good question. And why do we have broken down roads and bridges and infrastructure that looks like it's from the 19th century when Asia is across the board looking incredibly brand new, spanking new. They've got super trains, we've got nothing. Casey McManus and Caress Marie, thank you both for being here. Remind me for a minute, Caress, what is the date of the people's sick day and where can they find more information?

[Caress Marie]

Ah, joy. That's the best question you had to ask us tonight. Here's the thing. We're not calling the dates until we know we have the power. So we are going to give a 48 hour notice when we are ready to go. And that number hasn't been presented because we don't want them to know when we're coming. We want to move in silence. We want them to wait and see what happens. And once we have the people and the momentum and we call the dates, we will release that through our discord server or our Facebook group, and we will blast it all over social media and everyone who is in our servers will be making content, will be pushing the message, and we will definitely be heard.

[Joy Reid]

I love the answer. The answer is stay tuned, billionaires, because we're coming for people Sick Day. Thank you all very much. We appreciate you guys. Thank you for fighting for real working people. Thank you.

[Caress Marie]

Thank you.

[Joy Reid]

Thank you so much. All right. Now onto this issue of human rights violations by this regime when it comes to immigrants. I have a, I have a genuine question of whether members of the Trump regime should face the same scrutiny from the international legal institutions like the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice that Benjamin Netanyahu has and his defense minister has over the forced starvation of Palestinians in Gaza or Vladimir Putin has regarding the vicious war that he started with Ukraine, including kidnapping Ukrainian children and taking them to Russia to change their nationalities and wipe out their identity. And joining me now to discuss that is Professor Harold Koh, the Sterling professor of International Law at Yale Lawsuit Law School.

[Harold Koh]

Hi, Joy. Good to see you here.

[Joy Reid]

Good to see you. I'm going to hopefully get your wifi in order to make sure that we have a good clear screen of you, sir, but we can hear you even if the image is not perfect. And I'm just going to ask you that question point blank. When you look at the deplorable conditions that have been reported at the ICE detainment centers in South Florida, and we've heard about multiple conditions where people allegedly are living in filth, eating rotten food. There was one report of somebody who said they were forced to eat like a dog, having their hands clasped behind their back and forced to eat out of a bowl on the floor. And people being humiliated, flooding. And at the so called Alligator Alcatraz, which is actually a concentration camp with all of the things that we're hearing about what's being done, including also shipping immigrants out of this country to foreign gulags with no due process. Do you view the United States as now in the category of nations that could be brought before the ICJ or the icc?

[Harold Koh]

Well, certainly these are horrible offenses I litigated for Haitians and Cubans on Guantanamo years ago. And this is just a continuation of that practice. But I'm not sure that the international tribunals are the best way to go for a couple of reasons. First, you know, the Trump administration has been moving deportations offshore to the Sea Cot prison in El Salvador and then also created space in Guantanamo, which is offshore. But by creating this so called Alligator Alcatraz. They've actually made a mistake, which is to locate a substandard human rights violating facility on US Soil. Which means that actually the better angle is to pursue this through U.S. litigation. And two suits have already been filed which I think have potential for success. The first one, before a federal court is all about whether there are violations of due process because of the refusal to give detainees access to lawyers because of the substandard conditions, because of the refusal to give bond hearings. And that's moving to a preliminary injunction hearing. The other suit is about whether the facility can even be constructed, ironically, is supposedly being managed by the Florida Department, Department of Environmental Management, but they've done no environmental impact statement. And this is a facility that's been thrown together in eight days on a landing strip 50 miles west of Miami. So if the Department of Environmental Management is building this facility and you could stop it, then they wouldn't be able to use it for this purpose. Now, international courts could be used, but the United States is not subject to the jurisdiction of a number of these courts. And so therefore they're not a party to the icc. And so I think that's not an available option. If, if they're going to be sued by a foreign state, they need a foreign state to do it. And those who might do it, Venezuela or Nicaragua, are probably not sympathetic plaintiffs from the perspective of the US Citizens, they could bring a case at the Inter American Court of Human Rights or a UN Working group on arbitrary detention. I think they ought to do that. But I do think there is a general legal strategy that could be deployed against what I think is the broader Trump strategy with regard to these detainees. The Trump Strategy is the four Ds is to detain, then delegalize, so for example, strip them of rights by temporary protected status and then dehumanize and then deport. And so apparently 250 of the 700 people in this facility were previously people with some kind of status, and they just brought them there to strip them of their rights, and then to say that their only option is mass deportation. And what President Trump said when he went down there was that his goal was to create many such facilities like this in the United States, you know, gulags in the United States, which is an appalling idea. So I think it's very important to get this one declared illegal so that this counter strategy can be rejected. I think it can be done on constitutional law grounds as well as on the grounds that these are violations of international human rights, like the prohibition against cruel and human degrading treatment, and various violations of the International Covenant on Civil and political rights.

[Joy Reid]

So now, that last thing that you said, because this is the reason that I think a lot of people, a lot of people in the chat and a lot of people, well, including myself, are very skeptical of using the US Courts. And that is because John Roberts has essentially made it very clear that the purpose of the sixth Republican majority on the court is to do whatever it is Trump wants to give him unlimited power to make the presidency as close to a monarchy as possible, but only in the hands of a person in their party. So as long as there's a Republican president, John Roberts seems to believe this president should be all powerful. He should be able to violate rights. He should be able to do whatever he wants. So the idea of going through the US Courts when it will ultimately end up in the hands of this six Leonard Leo created majority, to me seems like a waste of time because in the end, they're going to say, oh, it's constitutional because Trump wants to do it. So, so if you can answer that, first question of what will be the point of going through a US Court system that's already been so further, so so far, captured by the far right.

[Harold Koh]

Two responses. First, most prison litigation in the United States or litigation against detention facilities never got to the court for a period of time. They're besieged with, inundated with various kinds of cases, and that usually to try to avoid the litigation, they improve the conditions or try to address the issues and make them go away. So the very act of filing the suit, bringing a lot of public pressure, starts to make the prison officials know that they're under scrutiny and then they try to clean up their act. So that would put us in a better position than we are right now. Here you have them starting to detain people even before they finish the facilities, which is one reason why it's been such a nightmare. Second, you know, I went to law school with John Roberts, and I'm not sure that the test of the Roberts court has yet happened. I don't think you need to read into this any, any, anything. But I think he does care about the reputation of the Roberts court, and I think that he is skeptical of the notion that that court should be viewed as a pawn of this administration. And.

[Joy Reid]

Wait, can I stop you right there? You went to school with John Robertson. You think that he cares about the reputation of the court and that he doesn't think it should be the court?

[Harold Koh]

I said he cares about the administration.

[Joy Reid]

About then why did he interpret. It's the court of the Roberts. No, I know about the Roberts court. But my question is, then, in that case, why then did he essentially rule that the 14th Amendment and Section 3 doesn't apply to Trump, that Donald Trump must be on the ballot regardless of him being an insurrectionist? And why did he write this wild decision? I think even a layman reading it would read it, as Sonia Sotomayor did, as effectively saying, Donald Trump is a monarch. He wrote.

[Harold Koh]

Well, first of all, John Roberts tries to be an incrementalist. That's how he views himself. He tries to duck these decisions on various kinds of procedural grounds and interpretive grounds. When a case gets to him that puts it squarely, I do think that there is a reasonable possibility that he and Coney Barrett will go the other way, especially if he understands that the reputation. His reputation is on the line. And as disturbing as these first months of the administration have been, I don't think that that moment has yet happened. And in fact, you know, there have been more than 70 rulings against the Trump administration, and there's been no significant core ruling on the merits. The universal injunctions case was litigated on a piecemeal ground. I think it was an outrageously bad ruling. But I think that the test of this is yet to come. And I've been watching the court for, you know, more than 50 years.

[Joy Reid]

Well, we're waiting for Emile Beauvais to join the court, because that is apparently the end game. My last question to you, professor, is about the International Criminal Court piece of it, because Israel is also does not subject itself to the International Court of Justice. They do not subject themselves to the icc. And yet South Africa was able to bring a case against them both for apartheid, which was ruled in South Africa's favor, and for the forced starvation of Palestinians, which they, by the way, have been doing for over a year. And they announced it in advance, the Defense Secretary saying, we're gonna cut off all the food, we're gonna cut off all the water, we're gonna cut off all the fuel. And they've done that. And now people are literally starving to death. They're not subject to it either, but they were brought into the international court system. So could not the United States be dragged into the international court system as well, based on the human rights violations? And as you said, it would have to potentially be from one of the nations of birth of one of the people that they are harming. And they haven't just harmed people from Venezuela and from other countries like that or from Cuba. They've harmed people from all over the world who were here as immigrants. Could not another country, regardless of whether we sign on to the process, drag us before those international courts the way Israel is?

[Harold Koh]

So, Joy, I was legal adviser of the State department. I've argued 10 cases before the International Court of Justice. The Israel case is different because it is based on the Genocide Convention. Whatever's happening in the Everglades, it's very hard to claim that it's a genocide. It, it is arbitrary detention. It's cruel and humor, degrading treatment. But it doesn't fall under the Genocide Convention. South Africa dragged Israel in front of using the Genocide convention, and the U.S. i think, could not be brought on that basis. The International Criminal Court is a different court, and they brought Netanyahu there on the same kinds of claims. The United States is not a party to the International Criminal Court, and it would be a hard case to bring, I think, and I'm not sure that the United States would respect that. Trump has issued sanctions against the International Criminal Court.

[Joy Reid]

Well, it is good to know, but.

[Harold Koh]

That'S a separate question from whether these.

[Joy Reid]

I appreciate the information. It is a question. Go ahead.

[Harold Koh]

I think what I'm saying is the best approach to counter Trump's strategy at this point is a unified legal strategy involving both domestic and legal claims to try to get various kinds of declarations and to try to promote this, put pressure on the way in which the facility is being operated to try to slow down the deportations, try to get more transparency in the media in and to make sure that this kind of operation doesn't get fully started in the Everglades and then doesn't get replicated elsewhere. And so I think that all available tools could be invoked, but not all of them are going to get past motions to dismiss. And the equivalent.

[Joy Reid]

Indeed. Great information. Professor Harold Koh. Thank you. Thank you very much. Sterling, professor of International Law at Yale Law School.

[Harold Koh]

Always good to see you, Joy. Thank you.

[Joy Reid]

Okay, so we can continue. Thank you so much. Thank you so much. We will definitely have you back. So that's it. You guys can continue to ruminate about that in the chat, whether or not you believe that this system can be broken through the US Courts. We've also heard from two of the three young ladies who are trying to do essentially almost a sick out, a sick out all over the country on a date to be determined later to impact the economy of this country to try to force a change by economic pressure. But let's go on to another fight that we've got. I want you guys to take a look at this clip. And this is a recent gathering of Democratic members of the United States House of Representatives who went to Texas to protest Governor Greg Abbott and Texas Republicans plans to redistrict that state in order to eliminate. Eliminate Democratic districts to comply with Trump's demand for five new Republican districts. What'd you say there? To ensure that his toady Republicans will keep the House of Representatives in next November elections. So let's play this clip, if we could.

[Al Green]

The president used that term because he knew that it would incite people. He wanted to incite people to believe that what he wanted done would be justified because minorities were somehow being given a privilege that they shouldn't have. That's what he was doing. He knew what he was doing. Very clever. But we're going to stand up against against this. And the truth of the matter is somebody has to have the courage to say that it's racism. Unfortunately, we have grown to the point in this country where you can use racism against people of color, but people of color can't respond and say that's racism. If we do, you're not going to print it, you're not going to carry it. What you're going to do is allow the racist statement to prevail. And what we try to do to fight it by indicating that it is racist, you allow that to just be words that evaporate into nothingness. So I just challenge you to members of the press, none of these friends of mine are doing it. They're not doing this. This is Al Green. I'm a liberated Democrat. I challenge you. Tell the truth. Let the world know that President Trump is using race and that we are responding to it.

[Joy Reid]

And that was Texas Representative Al Green, who joins me now. Representative Green, thank you so much for being here. I have to say that from the very time we started this show, you are one of the people that I have most wanted to talk to, because I, too, my friend, am a liberated Democrat. I want to give you an opportunity to say more about your frustrations with the media and the way the media has covered what's happening in Texas and what Trump is doing in general.

[Dan Bongino]

Well, thank you for having me. It really is a preeminent privilege to be on with you, and I must say, if I can, we really missed your voice. It really means so much. You not only spoke truth to power, you spoke truth about power. You speak truth to power. By saying power, there's a problem. Let's solve it. But when you speak truth about power, you say power, there's a problem and you're it. And you did that. You had courage. I could go on and on, but just thank you for having me on your program. I'm honored. There are two things that we can.

[Joy Reid]

Thank you so much, Representative Green, and that is an unsolicited compliment and I will give it back to you because let me tell you something, I actually, no one can really see it in my the studio, in our studio right now here at the Joy Reid Show. But if you were to pivot this camera. Representative Green, I actually have my only political picture that I have in this studio is a picture of you, sir, shaking your cane at Donald Trump and the Republicans in the well of the Congress. I actually ordered that photo from AP and blew it up because I'm like, I need that picture. It's inspirational to me. And the thing about it, to me that was actually sad about that picture, both sad, seeing you as a black man standing up there shaking your cane in a room for majority white room, as the whole white dais looking down upon you and this entire sort of Republican cohort, which is super monolithic, is staring you down, is that you were the only person standing. Is that my expectation when I saw that live was that everyone would stand up to and walk out behind you when you were dragged out of that room. And I wonder if you've had conversations with your fellow Democrats as to why. I mean, later on, some other members did walk out to their credit. But do you know why when you were dragged out of that room, you weren't followed by, you know, most of your colleagues.

[Dan Bongino]

Candidly speaking, I don't know why. I can only speculate and I'd rather not do that. I can tell you this, that it was something that I felt compelled to do. It wasn't something that was contrived. I went there to simply protest by walking out. But when he talked about his mandate, I was overcome by knowing that the committee that had jurisdiction of Medicaid had a commitment almost to commit some $830 billion. So I had to just speak up and let the president know that that wasn't a part of his mandate. Now, if I may move to your question, because there are two points that I'd like to make in reference to your question. Yes, I am a liberated Democrat. That means unbought, unbossed, unafraid, censured, but not silenced. And here are two things that we're picking up from this redistricting One that what they're doing is absolutely an abomination. They are committing racism with their new maps. And I can go into that. But there's a bigger issue that has come to light, and the bigger issue is people can use racism against us, but we can't say that word in our defense. If we say that word in our defense, we lose airtime. You have the courage to have me on, but they're not going to have me on these major networks because I'm saying the word racism. Even if it's there, we cannot. Now, here's where a lot of people get a little bit concerned when I make this comparison. But you have to do it. There's a commitment in this country to eliminate antisemitism. And by the way, I'm committed to it.

[Joy Reid]

I'm gonna ask you to hold on, Representative Green, because I know the audio is really low. It's low for me, and I think the chat is saying that they can't hear you very much what you're saying. So I want to try to get your audio as boosted as possible so that everybody can hear what you're saying. What you're saying is so powerful. So if we could in the control room, kind of boost that audio for Representative Green. So I'm gonna let you go ahead and start a little bit. If you turn up your audio on your side of your computer, it will actually make your audio louder. So if somebody in Representative Green's ear can just grab, reach over and pull his audio a little bit louder, because it's actually coming on your side. You just have a little bit of low audio. So if you could just boost it up to its maximum volume. Sir, if you could do that.

[Dan Bongino]

I'm going to come close. Just leave it there.

[Joy Reid]

Not come closer or come closer to that microphone. There you go. We're going to come.

[Dan Bongino]

Closer would be better.

[Joy Reid]

Yeah, closer to the microphone would be great.

[Dan Bongino]

Yes, sir. If you can pan your camera up to.

[Joy Reid]

And pan your camera up a little bit, you're probably on a laptop. So we know. Look, we are working on technology.

[Dan Bongino]

Okay, well, we're building it as we fly.

[Joy Reid]

Let me see. There we go. We're building the plane as we fly. It's all new media. So we're all trying to figure out how all of these things work. We want to just make sure that people can hear you. So here we go. All right, we're going to try it again. So you're talking about. I want you to start a little bit over and say that there's A reason why you're not, like, on every show. Because after I saw that video, I was like, ooh, this man's going to be hard to book because he's going to be everywhere. Why do you suppose that media is not listening to you?

[Dan Bongino]

Because in our country now, we have developed this notion that we must eliminate antisemitism. By the way, I'm for that.

[Al Green]

I'm going to do everything that I.

[Dan Bongino]

Can to eliminate antisemitism. But when it comes to racism, we seem to want to manage it, not eliminate it. And in managing it, we try as best as we can not to say it. We want it to just kind of evaporate, just go away. It'll be all right. Time in and of itself will cause this to dissipate, but that's not going to happen. It's not the passage of time, it's what you do with time as it passes that makes the difference. And we're not doing our job in fighting racism in this country because it still exists, it's still systemic, and it still is an impediment to our success. Not all of us, some of us are very fortunate and we make it through and we get to the top, but most of us are still lingering and dealing with racism that impacts our jobs, that impacts our promotions. And I will say this, my concern is that it can impact our healthcare. I mean, I have to be very careful where I eat. I have to be very careful what I consume, and I'm concerned about who's giving it to me to consume it. So this is the life that I live now. My life will never be the same again. But I'm still a liberated Democrat. I'm still going to speak truth to power and truth about power. We've got to do this because the bigger issue is, yes, the lines are there, and yes, these lines are racist. But the bigger issue is why can't we fight with the same tools that others use when they have a problem similar to ours? We are relegated to fight with both hands tied behind our backs and to use only, only some rhetoric that is soft so that we look a little bit servile, that we look subservient, that we look like we are ready to at any moment agree that this is nothing more than just another kerfuffle.

[Joy Reid]

I agree. I mean, respectability politics essentially only tends to constrain mainly black people. Right? Is that. You know, I get hit for this a lot, all the time. Well, why are you always talking about race? Well, I wouldn't talk about race if people weren't racist, right? If Donald Trump didn't do racist things, I wouldn't talk about race. It's not like I just want to talk about race just for the fun of it. I'm talking about race because he is doing racist things. And one of the racist things that he has done is to go to the governor of Texas, one of our most apartheid states. And I'm going to say that very deliberately. The reason I say Texas is an apartheid state, state is it is a minority white state where non white people have almost no power other than members of Congress. So folks like yourself or some state reps and state senators who are of color, black or brown, are the only representation that non white Texans have because statewide they have none. And yet what this governor has agreed to do at Trump's orders, he is being obedient to Trump. He says, Trump Sundays, I want five more districts. So Donald Trump's Department of Justice, their so called civil rights division, I now call it the Department of Injustice because they flipped everything on its head. They've said, well, you know what? We need to fix Texas because Texas is gerrymandered to make minorities have too much power. It's gerrymandered against white Texans. That is what you are responding to in that clip that we played at the top that Donald Trump has claimed his Department of injustice has now said, oh, no, the gerrymandering is against white Texans. They need more representation. So we're going to make five more seats by combining several other districts that are now governed by black or brown people. Combining them together, your district, Representative Castro's district and some others. Four out of the five being black run districts or districts run by black or brown people, combine them to make five Republican districts instead. Right? Is that, have I gotten that accurate?

[Dan Bongino]

Eminently correct. And if you were in this room, I would kiss the ground you walk on, literally. Dear lady, dear sister, thank you for saying it because you have a certain amount of credibility that you lend to anything that you say. You built this in your history. And I happen to have the communique from the, from the Justice Department to the Governor of the state of Texas. And this communique is very explicit. It says, and I'm going to quote, if the state of Texas fails to rectify the racial gerrymandering, they're introducing race of Texas 9. That's me, of Texas 18. That was Sylvester Turner, who has made his transition, 29, Sylvia Garcia, who's a person of color, and 33, who is Mark Veazey, the Attorney general reserves a right to seek legal action against the state. Now, Texas attorney general writes back and says to the Justice Department, the injustice department, thank you for correcting me. He writes back and says, in essence, this. Oh, no, no, no. That's not the way we do things in Texas. Remember, we don't say we're going to do things and gerrymander to benefit people. We say it's politics. This is how we do it. And by the way, when we say that, the Supreme Court has said, if you're doing it for partisan political reasons, somehow that's okay now. But what it does is it affords the person who's saying it to be the only person to know why you did it. And there's no way, except for this.

[Al Green]

Trail of evidence that they happen to.

[Dan Bongino]

Be leaving this time, that will help us when we get to court, because we are going to court. I already have my lawyers, I have my demographer. We are going to take this to court. But the important thing to remember is this, what you said about my state of Texas. Texas is the state that had white primaries. White primaries. Lonnie Smith, who was here in the state of Texas, here in Houston, Texas, was a dentist, and he took this case all the way to the Supreme Court to eliminate white primaries. What did Texas do afterwards? It had white pre primaries. This is the way Texas operates. Since we've had the Voting Rights act in place, Texas has been subject to it every year. Texas is a state that consistently tries as best as it can to suppress the votes of minority people, be they of any hue. Minority people. And you're right, it's a minority majority state. But minorities still control the levers of power. And that's got to change. But it won't change by us denying the facts. We've got to say it and we've got to fight with those tools that make the difference. We are having an Edmund Pettus Bridge moment. John Lewis was a dear friend of mine. We protested together, went to jail together. And he told me about the Edmund Pettus Bridge. He said that as they reached the apex where you could see what was on the other side, they knew what awaited them. Joy. They knew. But they marched on. And he said he thought he was going to die on that bridge. They beat them all the way back to the church where they started. Before that moment, we just had a little more than a handful of African Americans in Congress. But it was that seminal moment in time that made the difference. And it was the fact that they were willing to march on this is our Edmund Pettus Bridge moment. We need to march on. We need to. If they could fight racism by walking into billy clubs and people on horses, surely we can fight it by announcing it and saying it and telling people that we don't like it and that we're going to fight it at the polls and industries with peaceful protests, Non violent, peaceful protests. But we can do this. But we're not going to fight this moment appropriately and successfully until we decide to speak truthfully and take on the challenges associated with invidious discrimination.

[Joy Reid]

One of my personal heroes, Texas Representative Al Green, who knows how to fight the man who shook his cane at injustice, for the defense of Medicaid, for the defense of the poor. I'm a church girl, so I believe that Jesus enjoined us to. There it is. There it is. The man who shook that cane at the establishment and at power to say he's going to stand for the poor as Jesus commanded us to do. And who is now fighting for the representation of all Texans to make sure they have equal access to power. This is all about power, y'. All. If you're gonna be a Democrat at this point, you better be a liberated one if you wanna hang with me and Representative Green. Representative Greene, thank you so much.

[Dan Bongino]

Thank you. Thank you.

[Joy Reid]

Thank you so. Thank you so much. All right, y', all. So that's it. I mean, listen, this is the way we need to fight. And this is the reason that California is now proposing to do turnabout and change its redistricting to take away Republican seats. It's why Illinois is considering doing it. It's why New Jersey is considering doing it. It's why New York is considering doing it. And even if you oppose gerrymandering, you need to tell your representatives, if you're from one of those states, hey, Maryland, please do it. Also because we are at war with fascism. We are at war with apartheid. They are attempting to create apartheid. If you have to show your papers on the street due to the color of your skin, if you are approached by masked men, do you know what that looks like? It looks like 80s apartheid, South Africa. Black people in South Africa had to show their papers and show their identity in order to prove that they were allowed to be on the street in public, that is apartheid. If you cannot vote for the representatives of your choice because you're gerrymandered out of power, that is apartheid. And so the reality is we are living, unfortunately, in autocracy and apartheid, and we have to fight it like Representative Green fights. We don't have a cane to shake, but shake what you got. Thank you very much all for tuning in tonight to the Joy Reid show. Thanks for hanging with us through a little bit of technical difficulties, but we made it through. We're going to tell everybody if you're coming on the show, make sure you put your audio on high because we can only get the audio that you feed us. And so we got through it. And thank you all for tuning in. I want to also remind you guys to hit like subscribe and share to make sure we can give you more of this content. And if you are a Team TJRS member, in literally two minutes, you're going to come off of this feed. You're going to go on to a members only live event feed for the team TJRS YouTube and Premium Substack subscribers chat. That link is going to appear after we log off here. We're going to come out of this chat and go into that chat so that we can have our own conversation. You can ask me any questions that you have about any news stories of the day. You can ask about the whole world of being in new media. If you have questions about sort of journalism and how I got into that. Anything you guys want to ask, we're going to have a great conversation. But before we go into that chat, I want to thank each and every one of you, every single one of our subscribers who have grown by leaps and bounds since we started. Can you believe we've only been doing this for like six weeks? We literally are like six weeks old. We are a toddler. We are a toddler in the YouTube game. And yet we have hit over 5 million streams since we started. Over 5 million streams. But of those 200, nearly 240,000 people who are subscribing to this channel. Right? So many more are just lurking. They're just watching these shows, but they're not subscribing. Why are you doing that? So you should actually join the family. Do hit that subscribe button. Do hit that like button. Do hit that share button so that you can be a part of the Team TJRS family. If you want to subscribe to that premium subscription, do that. It's not too expensive. It's like eight bucks. But if you don't want to do that, just subscribe for free. Just make sure that you are in the family and not a lurker. We don't really need the lurkers around the neighborhood. We want everyone to be friends and be our fam. Thank you all for tuning in to the Joy Reid Show. And guess what? Have a great weekend, and I will see you on Monday, same bat time, same bat channel on the Joy Reid Show. Thank y' all very much. Love and peace.

[Al Green]

The president used that term because he knew that it would incite people. He wanted to incite people to believe that what he wanted done would be justified because minorities were somehow being given a privilege that they shouldn't have.