Karen Read fallout: New juror reaction, lawyers' spat, 'TikTok trials'

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Karen Read Murder Trial Fallout Episode: Karen Read fallout: New juror reaction, lawyers' spat, 'TikTok trials' Release Date: June 26, 2025 Host/Author: NBC10 Boston Podcast: Canton Confidential

---

Introduction

In the latest episode of Canton Confidential, hosted by NBC10 Boston, the focus remains steadfast on the aftermath of the Karen Read murder trial. Titled "Karen Read fallout: New juror reaction, lawyers' spat, 'TikTok trials'," the episode delves deep into the community's response to the not guilty verdict, the perspectives of jurors, the contentious exchanges between legal representatives, and the evolving landscape of high-profile legal cases in the age of social media.

---

Community Reactions to the Verdict

The trial of Karen Read, accused of murdering her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, concluded with a not guilty verdict—a decision that has polarized Canton’s 24,000 residents.

Hank Brennan, the special prosecutor, expressed his disappointment, stating at [03:37] MM:SS [03:37],

"I am disappointed in the verdict and the fact that we could not achieve justice for John O'Keefe and his family."

This sentiment echoes throughout the community, with mixed feelings among residents:

John Maroney highlights the town's divided stance:

"The jury foreman speaks out the harsh criticism he has for the police investigation." [Time: Various segments]

Conversely, some residents believe in Karen Reed's innocence:

Margaret McLean asserts at [02:52], "And I mean personally I think she's innocent."

However, skepticism remains, as exemplified by another resident:

Colton Bradford relays a resident stating, "She left him alone to die." [Time: 03:26]

The select board, in response to the verdict, has initiated changes within the police department, including the hiring of an interim chief [02:55].

---

Statements from Karen Reed's Family

Karen Reed's family continues to grapple with the trial's outcome, seeking closure and answers.

Nathan Reed, Karen's brother, shared his emotional reaction upon the verdict at [11:15],

"We heard the crowd just explode outside. It just reverberated through the building and through that courtroom. It's a sound and a feeling I will never forget."

Reflecting on the trial's progression, Nathan mentioned:

"The toughest part for me is seeing my sister drive through the mud, that. That she did this when we knew from the beginning she didn't." [12:17]

Despite the acquittal, Nathan remains empathetic towards Officer O'Keefe's family, emphasizing the shared grief:

"Karen can be not guilty and factually innocent, and. And we can still feel for that family and what their losses are." [12:41]

As for the future, Nathan acknowledges the lasting impact on Karen's life:

"She earned, in my opinion, whatever she wants to do, what she's going to do, I don't know. ... But we'll support her and we love her and, and she's just relieved and we're elated for that." [12:57]

---

Insights from Jurors

The episode provides an exclusive look into the jurors' perspectives, shedding light on their deliberation process and the emotional toll of the trial.

Paula Prado, a juror who chose to remain anonymous, recounted her experience:

"Everybody in that room was very smart and very committed to telling their story and their version of the story, which, more than anything, led me to walk into that jury room with no opinion." [15:34]

She further elaborated on their deliberation strategies:

"After about two months of being on the jury together without being able to share an opinion, I think we started making a lot more progress when I got, like, huge poster board paper and then worked with other members of the jury to write down the definition of every charge." [16:08]

Another juror, the jury foreman, expressed profound reflections on the verdict and the investigation's integrity:

"Karen Reid is innocent, and she didn't do this crime. No one could prove that she did this crime." [16:37]

He also criticized the police investigation:

"Moreover, even through multiple witnesses and testimony by his autopsy and everything, it was still... No one said to solid evidence that there was a collision." [17:05]

---

Legal Analysis and Expert Opinions

The episode features a robust discussion between legal experts Morgietta Derisier (Defense Attorney) and Margaret McLean (Former Prosecutor), analyzing the trial's dynamics and the subsequent fallout.

Defense Attorney Morgietta Derisier defends Special Prosecutor Hank Brennan's post-verdict statement against accusations of unethical behavior:

"I wouldn't characterize it as egregious or unethical." [05:32]

Margaret McLean counters, reinforcing that Brennan's actions were within ethical boundaries:

"A prosecutor is permitted to express disappointment on a verdict. So he is absolutely wrong [in criticizing Brennan's statement]." [05:14]

The conversation shifts to the broader implications of high-profile trials in the digital age. McLean raises concerns about the influence of social media:

"Are we entering into the era of TikTok trials? I mean, that's scary. Where's the truth? You know, where is the truth?" [07:29]

Derisier adds that while social media's role is undeniable, the quest for truth remains paramount:

"It's not so much that there isn't more evidence to be discovered... And how do you explain some of the inconsistencies that we saw not only in trial one, but also in trial two." [10:28]

---

Criticism of Police Investigation

A central theme of the episode is the jury foreman's critique of the Canton Police Department's investigation into Officer O'Keefe's death.

Juror foreman Latoya voiced significant concerns:

"Someone's laying on someone's lawn, but no one goes in the house. You know, it just doesn't make sense." [17:05]

Colton Bradford contextualizes this criticism, noting the disparity in how a police officer was treated compared to ordinary citizens:

"But I think what happened here is that a police officer was treated differently than any member of the jury felt that they would be treated." [19:19]

In response, Margaret McLean acknowledges some procedural shortcomings but defends the overall investigative efforts:

"I see what you're saying. However, the trial that I watched, the police did ultimately go into that house. Okay. And they asked questions of the Alberts and the McCabes. It was part of the investigation." [19:32]

Furthermore, McLean addresses allegations of misconduct involving Trooper Michael Proctor:

"Trooper Michael Proctor tainted this case from the very get-go. And that was something that Lally had to deal with and, of course, Hank Brennan had to deal with, and that was tough." [19:40]

Conversely, Michael Proctor, the investigator in question, vehemently denies any wrongdoing:

"I laugh because it's such a ridiculous accusation. There's not one piece of evidence or fact to support that because it did not happen. I would never do something like that." [20:35]

---

The Rise of 'TikTok Trials' and Media Influence

Margaret McLean raises a pressing concern about the intertwining of social media and legal proceedings:

"I feel like the truth is getting buried in the, you know, trying the case to the media. So, you know, in law school, from now on, are they going to have to have a law school class on how to run a successful PR campaign?" [08:25]

This notion is echoed by other panelists, suggesting that 'TikTok trials'—where cases are influenced or overshadowed by viral media content—are becoming increasingly prevalent.

Morgietta Derisier concurs, noting the challenges faced by investigators in the digital age:

"It's not so much that there isn't more evidence to be discovered. How do you go back over the evidence that was already presented? And how do you explain some of the inconsistencies that we saw not only in trial one, but also in trial two." [10:28]

---

Potential for Future Investigations and Legal Actions

Listener Sherry from Wellfleet inquires about the possibility of further investigations, such as an FBI probe into Officer O'Keefe's death post-acquittal.

Margaret McLean responds by expressing skepticism about the likelihood of reopening the case:

"I don't think so. Based on the evidence I followed in both trials, I truly believe... there's no evidence of third-party culprit." [09:49]

Similarly, Morgietta Derisier adds that revisiting existing evidence offers limited opportunities for new findings:

"How do you explain some of the inconsistencies that we saw not only in trial one, but also in trial two. So even if the FBI was to just take a stab at it, they would have to double their work and go back over the evidence that we already have, and they're not doing that." [10:28]

Regarding potential civil lawsuits, defenses and legal experts caution against their practicality given legal immunities and the prolonged, costly nature of such actions:

"Departments in the Commonwealth, including the police and other municipalities, have certain levels of immunity... And secondly, civil lawsuits take a really long time and a lot of money." [21:02]

---

Conclusion

The Canton Confidential episode on June 26, 2025, offers a comprehensive exploration of the multifaceted fallout following Karen Read's acquittal in the murder of Officer John O'Keefe. Through community voices, juror insights, family perspectives, and expert legal analysis, the podcast paints a vivid picture of a town grappling with justice, truth, and the pervasive influence of modern media. As Canton moves forward, the reverberations of this high-profile case continue to shape its social and legal landscape.

---

Notable Quotes with Timestamps:

• Hank Brennan [03:37]: "I am disappointed in the verdict and the fact that we could not achieve justice for John O'Keefe and his family."
• Margaret McLean [02:52]: "And I mean personally I think she's innocent."
• Nathan Reed [11:15]: "We heard the crowd just explode outside. It just reverberated through the building and through that courtroom."
• Paula Prado [15:34]: "Everybody in that room was very smart and very committed to telling their story."
• Latoya [17:05]: "No one could prove that she did this crime."

---

This summary is crafted to provide a detailed and engaging overview of the podcast episode, ensuring that listeners who haven't tuned in can fully grasp the episode's content and key discussions.

Transcript

[Priscilla Casper]

The Canton Confidential podcast is brought to you by NBC 10 Boston news worthy of you. Start your day with Latoya, Raul and Tevin, Weekday mornings at 6. NBC 10 Boston mornings worthy of you. NBC 10 Boston news worthy of you. Tonight, new reaction to the Karen Reed verdict.

[Colton Bradford]

Mainly the state police did a bad job and that caused the whole problem of this town.

[Priscilla Casper]

How Canton residents are responding to the resolution of a trial that divided the town. Hank Brennan offers his take on the verdict, but was his response appropriate? Our legal experts weigh in.

[Latoya]

Plus, someone's laying on someone's lawn, but no one goes in the house.

[Priscilla Casper]

The jury foreman speaks out the harsh criticism he has for the police investigation. We're catching you up to speed on what you may have missed since the trial ended and take a look at what could come next. Canton Confidential Karen Reed murder trial starts now.

[J.C. Monahan]

And we begin with new reaction to the Karen Reed verdict. Tonight we are hearing from residents of the town where the investigation began. Canton. Good Evening, everyone. I'm J.C. monahan.

[Colton Bradford]

And I'm Glenn Jones. Reed was found not guilty of the most serious charges she faced three and a half years after John o' Keefe was discovered outside a Canton home. John Maroney went to the town to see if residents had put the trial behind them. Yeah, I'm glad it's over.

[J.C. Monahan]

I'm not happy with the decision.

[John Maroney]

Canton was center stage throughout the case of Karen Reed, acquitted in the death of her boyfriend John o' Keefe. She was accused of hitting him with her SUV leaving the scene after accident resulting in deaths. Defendant not guilty or guilty. The 45 year old defendant was found not guilty after her first trial ended in a hung jury. Keeping the focus on the Snorfor county community of 24,000 for more than three years.

[Morgietta Derisier]

I think justice needs to still be served the end of the day.

[John Maroney]

Select board meetings quickly became forums where the town voiced opinions about the case and the investigation by Canton police. It even happened Tuesday, only days after the case ended.

[Morgietta Derisier]

People have shown up at my house, recorded me, screamed into my windows, spread vile rumors about me.

[J.C. Monahan]

If we keep sweeping things under the.

[Colton Bradford]

Rug, it's only a matter of time before we end up with yet another man down in the snow.

[John Maroney]

The select board chair was one of the first to issue a statement following the verdicts saying in part, our community has been deeply affected. We encourage members of the community to move forward together, treating one another with respect through civil, constructive dialogue.

[J.C. Monahan]

I think there's definitely a handful of people that still feel as though she did it.

[Margaret McLean]

And I mean personally I think she's innocent.

[John Maroney]

The select Board has taken steps to change things up in the police department. They have hired an interim chief while they look for a new one in Ken. I'm John Maroney. Back to you.

[Margaret McLean]

She's drunk.

[J.C. Monahan]

She was reckless.

[Colton Bradford]

She doesn't even know she hit him. She doesn't even have to know she hit him. But she did. She did. And she left a man who was kind and generous and thoughtful. She left him alone.

[Hank Brennan]

She left him alone to die.

[Colton Bradford]

That was special prosecutor Hank Brennan delivering his closing arguments to the jury. Brennan ultimately was unable to secure a conviction on the case's most serious charges.

[J.C. Monahan]

And then for days, we didn't hear from him. But on Monday, he released a statement. It reads in part, quote, I am disappointed in the verdict and the fact that we could not achieve justice for John o' Keefe and his family. District Attorney Michael Morrissey appointed me, giving me full discretion to independently assess the case and follow the evidence, no matter where it led. After an independent and thorough review of all the evidence, I concluded that the evidence led to one person and only one person. Neither the closed federal investigation nor my independent review led me to identify any other possible suspect or person responsible for the death of John o' Keefe.

[Colton Bradford]

On Tuesday, defense attorney Alan Jackson responded to Brennan's statement. He said, quote, the jury has spoken. But special prosecutor Hank Brennan, in an egregious breach of prosecutorial ethics, has tried to publicly shame and discredit that very jury. For him to attempt to supplant his personal views for that of the jury is a desperate attempt to save face in the wake of a unanimous rejection of the prosecution's case. The only job of an ethical prosecutor is to seek the truth in a just and fair manner. The Commonwealth fell wildly short of that responsibility. We're joined now by defense attorney Morgietta Derisier and former prosecutor Margaret Mc. Good to see both of you so soon after. We thought maybe we wouldn't see you.

[J.C. Monahan]

Told you not to go far, but here we are.

[Colton Bradford]

Margaret, maybe I'll start with you, because Alan Jackson's main argument was that Hank Brennan's statement was unethical. Do you believe crossed the line to being unethical?

[Margaret McLean]

Absolutely not. First of all, Alan Jackson has the law wrong in Massachusetts. Or the ethical rules, I shall say, because a prosecutor is permitted to. To express disappointment on a verdict. So he is absolutely wrong. And if we want to go into ethics, I can go into a lot more on Ellen Jackson.

[Colton Bradford]

Okay. Well, let me ask Morgietta before you do that. You're a defense attorney. Maybe you come at this slightly differently. Do you agree with Margaret that perhaps the statement was within the ethical lines?

[Morgietta Derisier]

So I know this is going to sound weird, but I do agree with my prosecution. Because when you're talking about prosecutorial egregious misconduct, you have to have a full showing that the person went beyond the scope of what they were entitled to say, and he was entitled to disagree with the jury's verdict. I think maybe using the word I and I concluded may have offended Alan Jackson, maybe offended the defense team, but I wouldn't characterize it as egregious or unethical. Or unethical.

[J.C. Monahan]

Why did he. Why would he take the time to put that statement out then?

[Morgietta Derisier]

You have to understand this is a high profile case. Right. And I'm sure they were at odds not only in the courtroom, but perhaps outside of the courtroom. And he has to protect his client's interest, too. And the statement that the jury. It looks like the jury got it wrong, but the jury is the one that decided this case. And Alan Jackson is standing up for his client.

[J.C. Monahan]

And there was more to Brennan's statement. He also used it to speak out against witness intimidation. He says, quote, we cannot condone witness abuse causing participants to worry for their own safety or that of their families. It is my hope that with the verdict, the witnesses and their families will be left alone. The harassment of these innocent victims and family members is deplorable and should never happen again in a case in this Commonwealth. Those statements, by the way, echo those of Norfolk DA Michael Morrissey, the man who hired Brennan. Take a listen to what he had to say in this video clip from 2023.

[Colton Bradford]

This will be the first statement of its kind in my dozen years as Norfolk District Attorney.

[Margaret McLean]

The harassment of witnesses and the murder prosecution of Karen Reid is absolutely baseless.

[Colton Bradford]

It should be an outrage to any.

[John Maroney]

Decent person, and it needs to stop.

[J.C. Monahan]

Okay, so Morrissey recorded that video before the first trial. Since then, we have not heard from him. Is this one of the cases where silence speaks louder than words?

[Morgietta Derisier]

I think I said it before on the show. I think it is a little underwhelming that we haven't heard more from him. I understand the position that he's in. He's in a really tough spot. And I think I said before, what do you say? Because now you have two trials where, unfortunately, they weren't successful. You have constituents and, you know, people from the Commonwealth who want answers. Not only the o' Keefe family, but the people who have utilized their resources to really push this trial forward. And I think the four words that he said was not enough. I'm sorry. It's just more to be said.

[J.C. Monahan]

The jury has spoken.

[Colton Bradford]

If you worked in his office, would you expect the leader of your office that you worked for to say something by now?

[Margaret McLean]

And here I agree with you, absolutely. He should have made a statement. And I think that what he should have said is, enough with the witness intimidation has to stop. And also he. He could have spoken to the PR campaign that was run by the defense before this trial, before trial number one even started. And what I'm worried about here, as a longtime lawyer, is, are we entering into the era of TikTok trials? I mean, that's scary. Where's the truth? You know, where is the truth? I feel like the truth is getting buried in the, you know, trying the case to the media. So, you know, in law school, from now on, are they going to have to have a law school class on how to run a successful PR campaign? And that. That's what really bothers me.

[Colton Bradford]

Yeah. We may already be there.

[Margaret McLean]

Yeah.

[Colton Bradford]

The question on the minds of many is whether there will be any further investigation into John o' Keefe's death. Like this viewer from Wellfleet, Sherry, wants to know now that Karen Reed has been acquitted of murder charges, will the FBI investigate to determine if there was or is a possible case against other individuals? So according to Hank Brennan, the FBI investigation is over. Others have said that to us as well. So assuming that is true, Margaret, what would trigger a reopening of that kind of probe? Is there anything in your mind that could do it?

[Margaret McLean]

I don't think so. Based on the evidence I followed in both trials, I truly believe that. Listen, I'm not blaming the jury here. They had a lot of evidence to go through. It was. I will never second guess a jury. That's just not what I do. But I do think that it's time to move on, to lead. There's no evidence of third party culprit. We went through that in this last trial. So there's no evidence that the McCabes or the Alberts or Higgins had anything to do with John o' Keeffe's death. There really isn't any. So I'd say move on.

[Morgietta Derisier]

And again, I'm going to agree. It's not so much that there isn't more evidence to be discovered. How do you go back over the evidence that was already presented? And how do you explain some of the inconsistencies that we saw not only in trial one, but also in trial two. So even if the FBI was to just take a stab at it, they would have to double their work and go back over the evidence that we already have, and they're not doing that.

[J.C. Monahan]

All right, we're going to check back in with both of you in just a moment. But right now, Karen Reid's family says they continue to look for answers. And tonight her brother Nathan is speaking out about the verdict.

[Colton Bradford]

He's also discussing the impact this case had on their family and what's next for them. Our Jeff Saperstone spoke one on one with Nathan Reed.

[John Maroney]

Guilty or not guilty?

[J.C. Monahan]

Not guilty.

[Hank Brennan]

What was your reaction on Wednesday when the verdict was read?

[Nathan Reed]

Elation.

[Margaret McLean]

Yeah.

[Nathan Reed]

Celebration.

[Hank Brennan]

Nathan Reed opening up days after his sister Karen was acquitted in the murder of her boyfriend, Boston police officer John o' Keefe. He was in the courtroom when the not guilty verdict was read.

[Nathan Reed]

We heard the crowd just explode outside. It just reverberated through the building and through that courtroom. It's a sound and a feeling I will never forget.

[Hank Brennan]

Nathan sat down with NBC 10 Boston. He has been by his sister's side through both trials. What was the difference maker?

[Nathan Reed]

I think we ran a tighter case, and I think the Commonwealth did, too, by the way.

[Hank Brennan]

He says a younger jury may have also helped this time around, but both cases capturing worldwide attention. Something Nathan says he was surprised at at first.

[Nathan Reed]

When social media got involved and when some of the YouTubers got involved, that really changed, and I think it also woke up this era, both to mainstream media, but also to our supporters.

[Hank Brennan]

Nathan tells us the last three and a half years have taken a toll.

[Nathan Reed]

The toughest part for me is seeing my sister drive through the mud, that. That she did this when we knew from the beginning she didn't.

[Hank Brennan]

Do you think you'll ever have answers as to what happened?

[Nathan Reed]

I question that. I struggle with that. I think our family has to make peace with the idea that we may never.

[Hank Brennan]

And while Wednesday's verdict was a relief for the Reed family, Nathan expressed sympathy for the o' Keefes.

[Nathan Reed]

Karen can be not guilty and factually innocent, and. And we can still feel for that family and what their losses are.

[Hank Brennan]

And as for what's next, Nathan says he doesn't think his sister will return to teaching or finance. He says life will be different.

[Nathan Reed]

So she's earned, in my opinion, whatever she wants to do, what she's going to do, I don't know. She. She, you know, there's been a lot of hugs. There's been a lot of tears. Those emotions are coming out now. But we'll support her and we love her and, and she's just relieved and we're elated for that.

[Latoya]

That was just one hole amongst many holes that I we had to sift through.

[J.C. Monahan]

Still to come, we're hearing from more jurors, including the foreman, what he says stood out about the investigation into the case.

[Colton Bradford]

Karen Reed has been acquitted in the murder of her boyfriend, John O' Keefe.

[Priscilla Casper]

Nobody covers the Karen re trial like NBC 10 Boston.

[J.C. Monahan]

I could not be standing here without.

[Priscilla Casper]

These amazing supporters in the courtroom and outside the courthouse.

[Margaret McLean]

This is nothing like we saw in the first trial.

[J.C. Monahan]

It's not a television show.

[Priscilla Casper]

It's real life, unmatched team coverage.

[J.C. Monahan]

It really is nothing typical when it.

[Hank Brennan]

Comes to this case.

[Priscilla Casper]

Every major story, we are on it. NBC 10 Boston news worthy of you.

[John Maroney]

DATELINE True Crime Weekly Andrea Canning and the Dateline team cover breaking crime news around the country. And now a special series with daily updates from the trial of Sean Combs.

[Margaret McLean]

I'll be talking to NBC News correspondent Chloe Meloss every day after court about what she's seeing inside the witnesses, the evidence and what it all means.

[John Maroney]

DATELINE True Crime Weekly Listen now, wherever you get your podcasts.

[Margaret McLean]

None of us, I can speak for all the jurors. We all felt really bad for the family. We all believe John was a great man and we all want the justice to be served to him, too, and his family. And the right person goes pay for this because a person died and whoever did or whatever happened need to come out.

[Colton Bradford]

Last week, our courtroom insider, Sue O' Connell went one on one with juror number 11, Paula Prado. Prado is just one of the jurors to speak publicly since the verdict was announced.

[J.C. Monahan]

Last week, our Darren Botello talked with another juror who's sharing her experience as well.

[John Maroney]

Not guilty or guilty? So say you, Mr. Foreman.

[Colton Bradford]

This jury member in the Karen Reed retrial says she'll never forget this sound, the crowd outside the courthouse in Dedham last Wednesday erupting after the verdict. Reed found not guilty of murder.

[Paula Prado]

It was overwhelming. There was so much grief and so much joy in that moment. And he really felt the weight of everything that we had done that day.

[Colton Bradford]

The juror wanted to remain anonymous. In fact, she says at first she didn't even want to be seated on the jury.

[Paula Prado]

I love my job. I didn't want to not be there for a long time. Also, it's a huge case that everyone has really made their mind up on.

[Colton Bradford]

But this juror didn't, she says, until deliberation started more than a week ago after closing arguments.

[Paula Prado]

Everybody in that room was very smart and very committed to telling their story and their version of the story, which, more than anything, led me to walk into that jury room with no opinion.

[Colton Bradford]

After about two months of being on the jury together without being able to.

[Paula Prado]

Share an opinion, I think we started making a lot more progress when I got, like, huge poster board paper and then worked with other members of the jury to write down the definition of every charge. At the end of the day, this was an absolute tragedy for the o' Keefe family, and I hope that they find justice.

[J.C. Monahan]

Well, this week, we also heard from the foreman of the jury.

[Colton Bradford]

He asked not to be named. He told the Today show why the jury voted to acquit Karen Reed.

[Latoya]

Karen Reid is innocent, and she didn't do this crime. No one could prove that she did this crime. Something did happen to Mr. O' Keefe and it's foul play or whatever you want to say, but there was no evidence to.

[Margaret McLean]

Even.

[Latoya]

Even through multiple witnesses and testimony by his autopsy and everything, it was still. No one said to solid evidence that there was a collision.

[J.C. Monahan]

I want to bring back our panel, Morgida Derisier and Margaret MacLean. Based off what you just heard from those jurors, did the defense do such a good job to prove that Karen Reed is innocent in all of this, or did the prosecution just fail to prove to the jurors beyond a reasonable doubt?

[Morgietta Derisier]

So I want to start by saying that I don't think there's a failure on either side. We just have to remember that the evidence has to be presented in the light most favorable to the prosecution or the Commonwealth. But they have to go to meet that burden, which is beyond a reasonable doubt. And it's a really high standard. It's one of the. It's the highest standard that we have in a case here in Massachusetts. And so the defense did a great job at pointing to reasonable doubt in this case, But I wouldn't call it a failure of the prosecution. The evidence that they had was difficult. I mean, the investigation just had so many inconsistencies that even retrying the same facts was not going to lead you to a different story.

[Colton Bradford]

The foreman also addressed the police investigation, what they did or did not do in the hours after o' Keefe was found in the snow.

[Latoya]

If I was in that house, I know that house would have been stormed first and foremost. Like, no one went into the house. Someone's laying on someone's lawn, but no one goes in the house. You know, it just doesn't make sense.

[Colton Bradford]

As you know, the house at 34 Fairview Road was owned by a Boston police officer at the time, a retired one. Margaret. I do admit to empathizing with that statement a lot because I remember before the first trial when I learned the details about the investigation, it did seem odd to me that no one, no investigator was coming into the house or searching the house, didn't even knock on the door. And it sounds like from this jury foreman, that's really when he lost faith in the whole investigation.

[Margaret McLean]

I see what you're saying. However, the trial that I watched, the police did ultimately go into that house. Okay. And they asked questions of the alberts and the McCabes. It was part of the investigation.

[Colton Bradford]

But I think what happened here is that a police officer was treated differently than any member of the jury felt that they would be treated. And that was the problem.

[Margaret McLean]

I see what you're saying. And I also will say that Trooper Michael Proctor tainted this case from the very get go. And that was something that Lally had to deal with and of course, Hank Brennan had to deal with, and that was tough. So, you know, I can understand where that juror is coming from. And in my experience as a former prosecutor, as they should, the jury will hold those investigators, the police, to a high standard. They have to dot the I's and cross the T's. And I do agree with that.

[J.C. Monahan]

All right, let's hear actually from the investigator who led this investigation, former straight state police trooper Michael Proctor. Defense suggested Proctor was part of a law enforcement cover up. But Proctor tells Dateline that those allegations are false.

[Paula Prado]

What do you want to say to.

[Margaret McLean]

Anyone who believes the narrative, the defense's narrative, that you are corrupt, that you framed Karen Reid?

[Colton Bradford]

I laugh because it's such a ridiculous accusation. There's not one piece of evidence or fact to support that because it did not happen. I would never do something like that.

[J.C. Monahan]

So this brings us to our next viewer question. Amy in Chicago asks, could Karen Reed file a civil lawsuit against The Alberts, the McCabes or the Canton PD or Michael Proctor? What? I don't know what they'd be. She'd be suing for morgietta.

[Morgietta Derisier]

But anyway, can sue anyone. We live in America.

[Colton Bradford]

Welcome to America.

[Morgietta Derisier]

Let's not forget that. However, there's two really important things here. Number one, there's immunity. So departments in the Commonwealth, including the police and other municipalities, have certain levels of immunity that I think she wouldn't be able to breach that barrier, depending on whatever she would be suing on. And secondly, civil lawsuits take a really long time and a lot of money. And to what end would you be achieving that? I think that sometimes people have the same spirit of lawsuits and they want to feel vindicated. But I don't think at this juncture that she would have grounds to sue these municipalities at this time.

[J.C. Monahan]

I can't imagine she'd want to step back in a courtroom or a lawyer's office or anything else. Morgietta, Margaret, thank you so much for being back here once again. We appreciate it.

[Colton Bradford]

A week after the verdict, still so much to talk about. You've been watching Canton Confidential, the Karen Reed murder trial. Have a good night.

[Priscilla Casper]

Watch Priscilla Casper and Colton Bradford, weeknights at 6 on NBC 10 Boston.