Democrats like to put a number on their lies.

Somewhere along the line, we were taught to stop asking whether these people actually knew anything, and instead just trusted the lanyard around their neck like it came with divine certification.

Democrats love to put numbers with their lies…

Fifty-one intelligence experts told us a laptop wasn’t real. Not “we’re not sure,” not “still investigating,” but full-throated, choir-level certainty.

130 climate scientists

12 former generals

And that’s the doorway into today’s theme: dismissing distortions. Not just correcting them, not just debating them, but dragging them into the sunlight like a raccoon that’s been living too comfortably in the attic of American politics.

Because those 51 experts weren’t an anomaly. They were a prototype. A beta test of how confidently wrong you can be if your job depends on staying wrong.

Think about it. We were told elections are secure. Not “mostly secure,” not “pretty solid,” but Fort Knox with ballots. Meanwhile, more than half the country watched vote counts behave like they were powered by a Ouija board.

Numbers going up, then down, then sideways like they were trying to escape the spreadsheet. You don’t need a cybersecurity degree to know something’s off when arithmetic starts acting like interpretive dance.

Now layer this: pollsters. These folks operate like fortune tellers who only predict yesterday. “It’s a tight race,” they say. Always tight. Always razor thin. You ever notice that?

According to them, every election is decided by a butterfly landing on a ballot in Wisconsin. Yet somehow, they never predict the political equivalent of a thunderclap, like 2016, when the entire system blinked and suddenly realized it had been narrating a different movie.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Dismissing the Distortions - Ep 26-160