
One week before Robert Roberson’s scheduled execution, the Texas Criminal Court of Appeals issues a stay.
Loading summary
Robert's Lawyer
We have won a battle, but we have certainly not won the war.
Podcast Host
Just seven days before Texas planned to execute Robert Roberson on October 16th for murdering his two year old daughter Nikki, and just hours after episode four of this podcast dropped, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals handed down a ruling. I immediately called Robert's lawyer, Gretchen Swinn. Gretchen, I'm looking at a two page ruling from the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. What does it say?
Robert's Lawyer
The bottom line is it says Robert is not going to be killed by the state of Texas.
Podcast Host
Next week, the court put Robert's execution on hold. You sounded like you're holding your breath there. Yeah, you can't believe this.
Robert's Lawyer
I'm somewhat in shock and I'm reminded when I first spoke to Robert nearly 10 years ago to tell him about the stay he had received in June of 2016 and he sounded like this little child and talking to me about a bag of chips and I feel like I too have this weight on my heart and I'm struggling to process this and probably would like to go eat a bunch of chips or something.
Podcast Host
Roberts case has been sent back to a lower court judge for review.
Robert's Lawyer
The good news is he, you know, we live to fight another day. The bad news is the fight that has been so protracted is not over.
Podcast Host
The new ruling that halted Robert's execution hinges on the case of someone you met in episode four, Andrew Roark, another Texas man convicted based on a diagnosis of shaken baby syndrome.
Andrew Roark
We end up at a elevator bank and there's five DeSoto police officers jump me and arrest me right there in the hospital.
Podcast Host
After spending 13 years in prison, prosecutors said Andrew was innocent and agreed with medical experts the science of shaken baby syndrome was outdated.
Andrew Roark
It doesn't make any sense that mine in his cases being so similar and me being on this side of it and, and he's still facing death.
Podcast Host
Now the court wants to know whether the finding of junk science in Andrew's case should apply to Roberts too. The Texas Attorney General did not return our request for comment, but in a press release last year, he insisted that Nikki was a victim of blunt force trauma and that the jury did not convict Robert on the basis of shaken baby syndrome. So this doesn't permanently stop the clock.
Robert's Lawyer
It certainly doesn't mean they could never set another execution date. If we go through all this and again lose, he would be back in this position again. But if we go through it and win, what it will then mean is finally that new trial that we've been fighting for.
Podcast Host
Can you just give me your personal reaction to what we've learned today.
Robert's Lawyer
My personal reaction is that I'm both elated and saddened, if that makes any sense. I'm very happy he's going to be alive next week for me to visit him and go over this. But I'm sad. He's, you know, he's almost 60 years old and, you know, here we are, you know, back at the beginning of another fight. I cannot believe the outpouring of support. I would certainly say that the national spot spotlight that your podcast has shown on this case and the independent reporting elevated this story. You know, I'm just so profoundly grateful for that. And I hope you'll stay with us because the fight's not over.
Podcast Host
We will stay on this story wherever it goes.
Robert's Lawyer
Who's ready for some football all season?
Today Show Host
The Today show takes you inside the game.
Robert's Lawyer
We are going to get this party started.
Today Show Host
Join us every week as we go behind the scenes with your favorite NFL teams for the biggest stories on and off the field. Big game tonight, plus game day recipes that dial up your tailgate.
Robert's Lawyer
Football food soup to nuts.
Today Show Host
From stadium lights to game day bites, the TODAY show is your home for all things football. Every morning on NBC.
Podcast: The Last Appeal
Host: Lester Holt (NBC News)
Date: October 9, 2025
In this episode, Lester Holt provides a real-time update on the urgent case of Robert Roberson, a Texas father who was scheduled for execution on October 16th for the 2002 death of his 2-year-old daughter, Nikki. Just seven days before the planned execution, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals issues a dramatic ruling, placing a hold on Roberson’s execution. Lester speaks directly with Roberson’s attorney, Gretchen Swinn, and revisits the case of Andrew Roark—a key parallel involving similar claims of “junk science” around shaken baby syndrome. The episode is a deep dive into the latest development in Roberson’s fight for exoneration, highlighting both hope and lingering uncertainty.
"The bottom line is it says Robert is not going to be killed by the state of Texas."
(00:36)
"I'm somewhat in shock and I'm reminded when I first spoke to Robert nearly 10 years ago to tell him about the stay he had received in June of 2016 and he sounded like this little child and talking to me about a bag of chips, and I feel like I too have this weight on my heart and I'm struggling to process this and probably would like to go eat a bunch of chips or something."
(00:50–01:21)
"We have won a battle, but we have certainly not won the war."
(00:02)
"The good news is he...we live to fight another day. The bad news is the fight that has been so protracted is not over."
(01:25–01:36)
Case Parallels: The court’s decision draws directly on the recent exoneration of Andrew Roark, who, like Roberson, was convicted based on the controversial shaken baby syndrome diagnosis.
"After spending 13 years in prison, prosecutors said Andrew was innocent and agreed with medical experts the science of shaken baby syndrome was outdated."
(01:58–02:09)
Roark’s Perspective:
"It doesn't make any sense that mine and his cases being so similar and me being on this side of it and, and he's still facing death."
—Andrew Roark (02:09–02:19)
Legal Focus: The current judicial review will determine if the “junk science” determination that freed Roark should also apply to Roberson.
"If we go through all this and again lose, he would be back in this position again. But if we go through it and win, what it will then mean is finally that new trial that we've been fighting for."
—Gretchen Swinn (02:45–03:00)
Swinn’s Reflections:
"My personal reaction is that I'm both elated and saddened, if that makes any sense. I'm very happy he's going to be alive next week for me to visit him and go over this. But I'm sad. He's, you know, he's almost 60 years old and, you know, here we are, you know, back at the beginning of another fight. I cannot believe the outpouring of support. I would certainly say that the national spotlight that your podcast has shown on this case and the independent reporting elevated this story. You know, I'm just so profoundly grateful for that."
(03:04–03:54)
Lester’s Commitment:
"We will stay on this story wherever it goes."
(03:54)
The episode captures a pivotal moment in Robert Roberson’s fight against execution. Just days before his scheduled death, his legal team achieves a rare victory—a court order pausing his execution and mandating a review of scientific testimony that mirrors the case of exonerated Texan Andrew Roark. Attorney Gretchen Swinn’s emotional responses lay bare the exhausting legal battle and emotional toll exacted by the death penalty system. The episode underscores the life-and-death stakes looming over Roberson’s case, the transformative power of new science, and the critical role of public scrutiny in the pursuit of justice.
Listeners are left with a lingering sense of both hope and uncertainty—the fight for Robert’s life is far from over.