
Loading summary
Stephen Colbert
Know what they say when they reach for a snack? Don't hold back. And that's exactly the approach with Wonderful Pistachios. The don't hold back snack. These little wonders are so tasty, it feels like getting away with something. But surprise. Each serving has 6 grams of protein and 0 grams of regret. That's right. No guilt, just glory. Whether it's a satisfying crack of in shell pistachios or the smooth instant gratification of no shells. No judgment. Wonderful Pistachios has every snack style covered. Right now there's an obsession with jalapeno lime. It's spicy, it's zesty. It's basically a flavor roller coaster in a nut. Snacking on the go Grab a bag of no shells. Feeling contemplative and want to work for it a little. Crack open those in shell beauties. Either way, it's snacking like a champ. So the next time hunger strikes, don't hold back. Snack like you mean it with Wonderful Pistachios. Visit Wonderful Pistachios do to learn more. Hey, Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. Now I don't know if you've heard, but Mint's Premium Wireless is $15 a month. But I'd like to offer one other perk. We have no stores. That means no small talk. Crazy weather we're having. No, it's not. It's just weather. It is an introvert's dream. Give it a try@mintmobile.com Switch upfront payment.
Interviewer/Host
Of $45 for three month plan. $15 per month equivalent required. New customer offer first three months only, then full price plan, options available, taxes and fees extra. See Mint Mobile.
Commercial Narrator
It's the Late Show Poncho with Stephen Colbert.
Ian McEwan
I'm Ian McKeown, I come from London and I'm a British novelist.
Interviewer/Host
Ian, thanks for being here. You are one of the most celebrated and critically acclaimed writers of our time. You are the author of 19 novels and two short story collections. And today you are here to talk about your latest novel, what We Can Know. Can we talk about the title? What We Can Know. As the book goes on, you start thinking, can we really know anything? What does the title mean to you?
Ian McEwan
It runs on several levels. What we can know about the past, what we can know about the future, and what we can know about each other and how difficult it is sometimes to break through even to the person closest to you. So it's a dialogue with history, with futurology. The future of love, the future of history. In some senses it's, I guess A science fiction novel without the science. I'm interested in all those things that science fiction don't look into, like what's the future of universities, humanities, intellectual life, artistic life, but also love, betrayal, changing circumstances through time, and getting the present and past and future all into some kind of dialogue with each other.
Interviewer/Host
How did you choose 21, 1990, four years from now, as the amount of time in the future you wanted to set this story?
Ian McEwan
I started with 400 years, and then a very good friend of mine, who's one of my first readers, on his first reading of an early draft, said, I think 400 years is too long. You're writing in the same language, although you've got all kinds of explanations of why language hasn't changed much. It would be so much more alive if it was a future that we could almost reach out and touch. And I used to, as a young writer, not take notes very easily from other readers early on. And I've come round to the view that you know a good note the moment you hear it. It's a matter of recognition. As soon as he said it, I felt relief. Yes, it has to be. A hundred years would do it fine.
Interviewer/Host
What was it like to imagine the future that you describe in this book, and what sort of research did you do to imagine this fate?
Ian McEwan
Well, I'll answer the second question first. I used to do a lot of research for my novels, and now I've reached the age I'm 77. I feel that my head is so stuffed with stuff that I try to treat it like a garden. And I prefer to go down there, those garden paths into my own mind and my own memories. As researcher, I didn't research a thing for this.
Interviewer/Host
Your character Tom, and his pursuit of this lost poem makes me think, what is the importance of art when the world is burning?
Ian McEwan
Well, I've passed the point of thinking that climate change fiction can warn people, because it's already happening. We're in it. We don't need to be warned. So the function of art, one element of that is to render pleasure to us, aesthetic pleasure, and another is to open a discussion, and I'm talking particularly of literature here, of trying to understand where we are, what we are, who we are, what it's like to be a man or woman in a city, in all the conditions of modern life, to reflect back on us what we are. And that's really why I thought that having someone writing about us from the future, who half envies us, half despises us for all our mistakes, would Be another way of carrying on that discussion that I think literature is. Is always having with itself and with its readers. What's going on now? Where are we heading? Where have we just been? Is human nature changing? Or are we about to interfere with human nature by bioforming? So, yeah, I'd put it there, but pleasure has to be a strong element in this.
Interviewer/Host
The concept of a lost poem that has achieved this myth like quality, so much so that a scholar wants to track it down 100 years later, is for any lover of the written word, so romantic. Was there a real poem that inspired this?
Ian McEwan
There absolutely was. It was written, it was published about four years ago. It's by John Fuller, an English poet now in his 80s. And I should just explain that this is called a corona. It's got nothing to do with the pandemic. It is basically Renaissance or rococo form. It consists of 15 sonnets. The last line of each sonnet has to be the first line of the next. The 15th sonnet is the corona, the crown. And it. And this is a real tough one, it has to. It consists of the first line of all the preceding 14 sonnets. And. And it has to make really good sense. And a corona traditionally is spoken or addresses one particular person, a loved one, perhaps. And Fuller's poem was published, and I read it and I was astonished by its beauty, how relaxed it was with all these rules. You hardly notice. I didn't guess for a minute when I read this poem that I was going to write a novel about this poem. But it. It bit hard into my thoughts and feelings. And two years later I was fully engaged with just such a poem that gets lost. Maybe I think a lost poem, like a poem as good as this that got lost, would be a terrible tragedy, as it were, and make us value it all the more. Along the way, I wrote just the odd few lines of this imaginary poem. And I'm not a poet. And when I gave it to one of my close readers, early readers, he loved the novel, he said. But he said, do not quote from this poem. You are not a poet. So I thought, well, that's such a good note. It's an act of recognition, a good note. And it would put the reader in the same position as all of us, including myself. We do not know what's in this poem.
Interviewer/Host
I love it. If you knew you were going to be teleported to a dystopian future where access to books is limited, but you know you can bring one book with you, right? What book are you bringing?
Ian McEwan
And I'm not allowed a 40 set encyclopedia. I guess I probably would take James Joyce's Ulysses because I'm always dipping into it with such pleasure. The beautiful rhythm of the prose, the strange division of its, its sections, the wonderful soliloquy of Molly Bloom at the end of it, and the wit and warmth of the novel. I know quite a few fellow writers who treat it almost as a Bible. I see that quite a few people I know just keep it on their desk. It's just always there. You don't have to read it end to end. So I think that would be a colossal comfort to me to have that. Joyce, I think, was revolutionary. Rather like Wordsworth. He changed our minds about what the novel could do. He brought us into some understanding of how we might represent the flow of consciousness. And also he was revolutionary too, because he, he could write about children so well, as well as Dickens, as well as Jane Austen, if not better.
Interviewer/Host
This is your 19th novel. Has your writing process changed? Does it get easier, harder?
Ian McEwan
I was one of those writers who sweated over every sentence. When I started out, I was very unsure of myself. I, I felt I was a slow learner in the art of fiction. And slowly I got, after about 20 years, slowly getting faster and slightly more at ease with myself. I got to the point where I've been in the last maybe 15 or 15 or 20 years. I think I'm in my 50th year of writing, so that just about makes sense. Now I have a much stronger sense once an idea has started to form, or more typically once two ideas have started to merge. Like this poem impressed me. But I was also following closely on the Internet, some organizations that want to send information into the future in case civilizations collapse. So how to make soap, how to make glass, how to make a three crop rotation, what is a germ theory of disease, and so on. And that notion of the future and this poem came together so just to describe one process. And as soon as that was there, it began to flow and then it moved from one gear into another, into another, so that I, I think after about three months of doing this, I knew I had my material and I felt fully in command of it in a way that my 25 year old self would have been very envious of. So not every, not everything gets worse as you get older.
Interviewer/Host
Well, speaking of those envious 25 year olds, do you have a piece of advice that you give to aspiring writers?
Ian McEwan
Yes, it is. You must recapture the privileges that we all had when we were in our 20s. And that is and this is one of the great luxuries of civilization. It is the luxury of solitude. And you cannot have solitude if you are online. So my advice is you must have at least three, preferably five hours a day where there is no screen, no outside world pressing in on you and open up your own mind to your own examination. It's very, very fruitful.
Stephen Colbert
Wow.
Interviewer/Host
Thank you so much for being here, Ian. It was such a pleasure to chat. What we can know is available everywhere. Books are sold. For Late Show Book Club updates, follow our Instagram colbertlateshow.
Stephen Colbert
Thank you for listening to the Late Show Pod show with Stephen Colbert. Just one more thing. If you want to see more of me, come to the Late Show Give.
Commercial Narrator
The Gift of Language the holidays are coming up and there is nothing more meaningful than learning something new. Whether you want to reconnect with family roots, prep for an upcoming trip, or give someone a gift that actually lasts, Rosetta Stone is the perfect way to start something special. Rosetta Stone has been the trusted leader in language learning for over 30 years. Their immersive, intuitive method helps you truly pick up your new language naturally. No memorizing random vocabulary lists. No feeling lost. As trusted language experts with 30 years of experience, millions of users, and 25 languages to choose from, including Spanish, French, German, Japanese and more, Rosetta Stone is the Go to tool for real language growth. Don't wait. Unlock your language learning potential now. Listeners can grab Rosetta Stone's lifetime membership for 50% off. That's unlimited access to 25 language courses for life. Visit RosettaStone.com RS10 to get started and claim your 50% off today. Give a gift that keeps giving. Go to Rosetta Stone.com RS10 and start learning today.
Stephen Colbert
As a raider scavenging a derelict world, you settle into an undergr. But now you must return to the surface where arc machines roam. If you're brave enough, who knows what you might find. Arc Raiders a multiplayer extraction adventure video game. Buy now for PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X and S and PC rated T for teen YouTube channel. For more clips and exclusives.
Episode: Late Show Book Club | 'What We Can Know' Author Ian McEwan
Date: November 15, 2025
In this Late Show Book Club special, celebrated British novelist Ian McEwan joins Stephen Colbert to discuss his latest novel, What We Can Know. The episode centers on McEwan’s exploration of knowledge—what is knowable about the past, future, and each other—in a near-future setting. The conversation covers McEwan's writing process, the inspiration behind his new novel's pivotal lost poem, the role of art in turbulent times, and advice for aspiring writers.
“It’s a dialogue with history, with futurology. The future of love, the future of history. In some senses it’s, I guess A science fiction novel without the science.”
—Ian McEwan (02:18)
“You know a good note the moment you hear it. It’s a matter of recognition.”
—Ian McEwan on receiving editorial feedback (03:54)
“The function of art, one element of that is to render pleasure to us... another is to open a discussion... trying to understand where we are, what we are, who we are.”
—Ian McEwan (05:13)
“We're in it. We don't need to be warned.”
—Ian McEwan, on climate fiction (04:59)
“Do not quote from this poem. You are not a poet.”
—McEwan’s friend/early reader (08:28)
“The beautiful rhythm of the prose, the strange division of its sections, the wonderful soliloquy of Molly Bloom at the end of it, and the wit and warmth of the novel. I know quite a few fellow writers who treat it almost as a Bible.”
—Ian McEwan (09:15)
“So not everything gets worse as you get older.”
—Ian McEwan on writing with age (12:29)
“You must have at least three, preferably five hours a day where there is no screen, no outside world pressing in... open up your own mind to your own examination. It’s very, very fruitful.”
—Ian McEwan (12:56)
On the novel’s scope:
“The future of love, the future of history... a science fiction novel without the science.”
—Ian McEwan (02:18)
On critical notes:
“You know a good note the moment you hear it. It’s a matter of recognition.”
—Ian McEwan (03:54)
On the value of pleasure in literature:
“Pleasure has to be a strong element in this.”
—Ian McEwan (06:13)
On the advice not to write poetry:
“Do not quote from this poem. You are not a poet.”
—Anonymous friend/early reader (08:28)
On the role of solitude in creativity:
“You cannot have solitude if you are online.”
—Ian McEwan (12:45)
| Timestamp | Segment | |---------- |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | 01:39 | Introduction of Ian McEwan and the premise of What We Can Know | | 02:09 | Multiple meanings behind the book’s title | | 03:13 | Decision to set the story in a near (vs. far) future | | 04:19 | Approach to research for this novel | | 04:57 | The purpose of art in crisis times | | 06:37 | Inspiration for the lost poem | | 09:06 | Book McEwan would take into a dystopian future | | 10:43 | Reflections on 50 years of writing | | 12:42 | Advice for aspiring writers |
This episode offers a rich, intellectual yet deeply accessible insight into Ian McEwan’s latest work and creative philosophy. With wit, humility, and candor, McEwan reflects on the challenges of grasping knowledge, the intertwining of past, present, and future, and the enduring importance of art. His stories about the writing process, the inspiration for central motifs, and practical advice for writers make for a thoughtful and inspiring listen—perfect for novelists, readers, and anyone interested in the deeper questions literature can ask.