
Loading summary
Billy Hindle
Hi everyone, it's Billy Hindle, the voice of Alice in the Magnus Protocol, here. Today we are bringing you the first episode from one of the amazing podcasts that has just launched on the RQ Network, Plant Murder, which is created by the talented Aaron Reardon, who also creates the podcast Selene. Plant Murder is a podcast that cultivates the deadly intersection of plants and true crime throughout history. This first episode, titled Claudius vs. The Death Cap Mushroom, finds Claudius, the Emperor of Rome, seated at a feast, surrounded by his family, his trusted servants and an assortment of delicacies. But something about this night is different. It happens fast. One minute he's gorging himself on his favorite foods, the next, he collapses. What killed him? Poison in the Molson wine? The stuffed dormice? The oysters? Or his favorite, a tiny hidden killer slipped onto his plate of mushrooms. And who put it there? You can listen to more of this brilliant series by searching for plant Murder wherever you listen to your podcasts by clicking the link in the Show Notes below, or by visiting rustyquill.com or cleverthen.com for more information. Have fun and enjoy the episode.
Aaron J. Reardon
Come, thou who art burdened by so many great misfortunes, utter once more thy sad lamentations surpass the kingfishers and the sweet swift nightingales, for thy fate is more grievous than theirs. Dusk at the Domus Tiberiana on Palatine Hill. A bronze plate falls from the table. The guests in the dining hall hush. A man stumbles. His vision doubles as delirium slips him closer to the floor. He stammers for help. The most powerful man in the ancient world is dying, slain by a deadly little mushroom. But who poisoned him on the final night of his tumultuous life? I am Aaron J. Reardon and this is Plant Murder. Each episode we delve into the fascinating and deadly plants that have left their mark on human history in this Emperor Claudius of Rome and the Death Cap. Mushroom murder, though it have no tongue, will speak with most miraculous organ. As Claudius lay gasping for breath on the cold marble floor, his body racked with convulsions, the evidence of his murder was already slipping away. What killed him? The poison in the molten wine? The stuffed dormice? The oysters? Or his favorite, a tiny hidden killer slipped onto his plate of mushrooms. As we peel back the layers, ask yourself, was Claudius of such ill health that he was one of the rare emperors that died of natural causes, a so called syco mortem, a dry death? Or was he one of the many that died of foul play? It's 10-13-54 CE we're on Palatine Hill in Rome. A chilly night in autumn. The Domus Tiberianus, the house of the Emperor. And we're standing in the dining hall. A sprawling chamber with marble columns veined with purple and gold rising toward a painted ceiling. Flickering light from bronze sconces dance across frescoes, casting long shadows. Murals of Dionysian revelry. Nymphs and satyrs caught in celebration. Faces twisted into masks of joy mocking the tragedy about to unfold. Below the table, a low slab of dark wood. Platters of roasted dormice, honeyed figs and coated olives. The air heavy with spiced meat. A small mixed group of family and trusted staff reclining on the triclinium as they sip wine. Let's hold this moment. Let's stroll around the room and get a good look at everyone who is here with us in this dining hall. I see a wife, a soldier, a eunuch, a doctor, two sons and a plate of mushrooms tumbling to the floor. They are all looking at the sudden commotion raised by this man here at our feet, collapsing in front of them, our victim, Emperor Claudius. Before we get to the guests, let's take a look at this poor, quivering fool. His tunic disheveled and stained with vomit. His posture hunched. Thinning hair streaked with gray. Sallow skin stretched too tightly across his face. Deep lines etched into his brow, around his mouth. His eyes are bloodshot, watery. They search about in confusion and fear as the poison takes hold. His hand claws at the edge of the table as he pulls at the cloth collapsed on the floor, bent and cowering. This. This is the Emperor of Rome. The gods do not always smile upon those who are born into greatness. We're in the Palatine Gallery. We're not far from the house. It's 13 years earlier. A bright, crisp January, and in just a moment, right there, Claudius, obnoxious nephew, is about to be stabbed to death in broad daylight. And his nephew's wife and daughter smashed to bits. You might know his nephew's name. Caligula. I thought so. One emperor slumped in the dust, leading out with that why me? Look on his face. And where is Claudius right now? He's about to become Emperor because of his nephew and the Praetorian Guard, which is like the secret service for Roman emperors. While Caligula was still warm, they raced down the halls of the palace, found Claudius cowering behind a tapestry and yanked the poor fool into the imperial seat because they wanted to stay in power. Claudius was never supposed to be emperor. A tragic Figure I don't mean to be cruel. He had a very difficult life which shaped his character. Claudius entered the world with both immense privilege and crushing stigma. He was the grandson of Mark Antony, the war hero who shacked up with Cleopatra. Shakespeare has a great play about that. Claudius was born into a powerful and noble family. But unfortunately he was born with afflictions. Possibly Tourette's or maybe cerebral palsy. Claudius had a stammer, limp and uncontrolled outbursts of speech and uncontrollable laughter. In the shadow of more charismatic figures, Claudius was dismissed, mocked and left on the margins of Roman political life. He was taunted by everyone. His own family would mock him, throw food at banquets and tickle him awake with a feather. Whenever he fell asleep at the table, he had a difficult go of it. So are you getting the picture? It was an embarrassment to his rich and powerful family and so was pushed out of view and the butt of everyone's joke. But he persevered, writing histories mainly. Perhaps he found escape from an unkind world. Once merely a consul to Caligula, never considered a true contender For Emperor, at 50 years of age, Claudius now stood as the unexpected ruler of Rome, yanked into the imperial seat. And now from that seat, he tumbles to the floor at our feet. Fetal. Brutal. Stomach cramps. Dying. Why, after 13 years as emperor, would the people around this table want him dead? Despite his accomplishments well into adulthood, Claudius was constantly mocked and manipulated. Was he simply a victim? Or did he know the conspiracy brewing around him? Let's look at the faces around the table. Which one of them looks the most guilty? A wife? A soldier? A eunuch? A doctor, his two sons and a plate of mushrooms tumbling to the floor? Let's start with the most obvious. His wife. Great power and greater ambition have nothing in common with self Estreit. This striking woman with a commanding presence at the end of the table is his wife, Agrippina the Younger. Her dark braids pinned up with a golden diadem, a rich adorned pleated stola. She is 39 years old at this dinner and she is one of the most compelling figures in history. It's 39 CE. We're on the volcanic shores of the island of Pontiac. The rocks are razor sharp and life is very difficult on this small island. One of the only ways to survive is to dive for sponges. And just under the waves over there, you can just make out Agrippina the Younger. She's not married to Claudius yet, she's just 24. Here she's been Exiled to this island after the plot of the Three Daggers, a conspiracy to assassinate her brother Caligula. And yes, if you're paying attention, that means that Claudius was her uncle. She'll be here for another two years before Claudius brings her back to Rome. She spends every moment on this island scraping to survive. It's a far cry from her upbringing in a wealthy family. Hunting for sponges is difficult work. They have to hold a stone known as a scandalopetra, which helps sink them quickly to the seafloor. She has to work swiftly, staying underwater for as long as her lungs will allow. She could drown. There's shark attacks, she can get the bends. She can get entangled in seaweed or cut herself on the coral. Agrippina is a tough one. And her story reads like something from a dark myth. A young girl thrust into the violent heart of Roman power. Listen to this. Life on campaign in Europe as a child, married at 13 to a violent 30 year old man. He dies. She marries again. He dies under odd circumstances. Her brother goes nuts. He's forced into a possible incestuous relationship. Conspiracy. Thrown to exile on this sharp, isolated island. Dies for sponges to survive. She's brought back. Marries a man mocked for his afflictions, practices dark magic rituals and has underworld connections. That husband dies. She continues her obsession with the elevation of her son to emperor, all while ruling in parallel. It's almost impossible to find an account of Agrippina without the words ruthless or ambitious. Throughout, she navigated her way from exile to empress, pulling public opinion along with her. Why is Agrippina the primary suspect for Claudius murder? Well, she lived an impressive life. Seemingly fearless, she survived a cutthroat family, dynasty, exile, abuse and even her own assassination attempts. These powerful families had purges. They killed anyone who might be a threat, especially the stakes of noble lineage. Any claim for the throne. Her father murdered, her mother died in exile. Tiberius killed two of her brothers. And the third, Caligula, was stabbed to death in public. Her sisters were both dead. She was the only surviving member of her family. And like one of those sharks, Agrippina felt that if she stopped ascending, she would meet her end. Maybe she was so conditioned to that bloody environment that that was all she knew. Agrippina was Claudius fourth wife and niece. A marriage suggested by the Senate. An incestuous relationship. He had to change Roman law to make it happen. A marriage of convenience to unite the two main families of the Julio Claudian dynasty. It's fair to say that Agrippina came back to Rome with the express Mission to marry an emperor to secure her future. The only way to survive. She once got attacked for being too forward. When she publicly made a pass at Emperor Galba, his wife clocked her in the face. She seemed driven and fearless by all accounts, but possibly without much choice. We are going to go around this table, and you are going to see that everyone else is connected to Agrippina. And she has been positioned as the ringleader of a conspiracy with favors, promises, threats. She was already an empress at this point. Why would she need to kill Claudius? Well, what if I told you that Agrippina had killed before? Are all the pieces falling into place as she sees Claudius tumble to the ground? Or is that a look of compassion in her eye? And did we see Agrippina eat from the same dish of mushrooms that Claudius did? Was Agrippina the Younger, the Lady Macbeth of ancient Rome? Well, if she was, she couldn't do it alone. She would have had to recruit some accomplices. So, before we rush to judgment, a nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious, but it cannot survive treason from within. Here's the thing about Rome. It's a city built on indulgence, influence and blood. During the Julio Claudian dynasty, the palace is a place of paranoia. Dozens of poisonings have taken place. Purges, conspiracies and rivalries. The very figs on the trees have been coated in poison. And Tiberius Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus knew this better than anyone. The man lived his whole life in the shadow of sharper, crueler men. And this dinner had a few knives hidden behind their smiles. So let's look around this table again. A wife, a soldier, a eunuch, a doctor, two sons and a plate of mushrooms tumbling to the floor. The wife we know is Agrippina, who was the soldier in his purple cloak and shiny silver brooch that held it fast to the shoulder, the razor sharp gladius in its leather sheath, and a pugio dagger at the ready. This was not any soldier. This was Sextus Afranius Queres, the prefect of the Praetorian Guard, responsible for the Emperor's security and maintaining order in Rome. Burris is a career soldier who spent much of his time in politics. He tends to hover close to Agrippina and her son, almost like a surrogate father. He keeps a very close eye on the boy. He's 53 years old, his once dark hair turned mostly gray, cut short to match his neatly trimmed beard. Could the head of the Praetorian Guard have acted independently to remove Claudius? Possibly. Without Agrippina knowing No way. Burruss was fiercely loyal to Agrippina, who had positioned him to ensure her son's protection. However, Burrus owed his career to Agrippina, which complicates his role in Claudius death. As he watches Claudius falter, was he gripping his dagger to finish him off? Were his loyalties to the Empire or Agrippina? Why not just stab him like the others? We could assume that a violent death could destabilize the Empire and risk civil war. So it had to be something that looked like an accident. Burrus couldn't act alone, but he could have turned a blind eye. Maybe he loved her. Maybe they had an affair behind Claudius back and Burrus wanted him out of the way. I think he's wrapped around Agrippina's little finger and he's at the ready to do whatever she asks. Claudius wasn't despised the way Caligula was. Claudius did much good for the empire. So you couldn't just stab the guy to death at dinner. You'd have to make it look like an accident. So let's turn to the next in line. An accident like a poisoning is hard to prove, but you'd have to slip it past a key figure that every Emperor relies on. We're in the imperial kitchens. These are huge on the palatial grounds and they're staffed by dozens of slaves cooking day and night. It would be difficult to poison a dish in here because of the eunuch there. He's the trusted food taster. His name is Halotus and he's keeping a watchful eye on the preparation of all the dishes. He has a tenuous relationship with the Archimagirus, the head chef. Halotus would have sampled anything the Emperor would likely have eaten, especially his favorite dish of prepared mushrooms. Polotas almost blends into the decor. Now in his mid-40s, his deep set dark eyes seem perpetually watchful, scanning the surroundings with quiet intensity. His voice is higher pitched, lacking the deep resonance of most men. He's used to standing just out of view in the corner of your eye, confidently giving a nod that all the food has been tasted and tested and everything is set up exactly how Claudius likes. His slender, wiry frame moves quietly through the palace halls. His smooth, pale skin and lack of facial hair immediately mark him as a unit. Halodos was responsible for Claudius safety. How could Halodes Claudius, food taster, have let a poisoned dish slip past him unless he too was complicit? Halodus job was to taste every dish before Claudius ate it, ensuring the Emperor's safety Yet Claudius still died after consuming something. Was Halotus involved or did a savvy agent bypass him completely? While we don't have good reason to doubt Halotus loyalty, he was either complicit or someone else snuck a plate without him noticing. And since it was his job and he seemed quite good at it, we can assume that was less likely. However, there's one important thing about. Well, it's sort of an open secret. Claudius was an incredible glutton. He overindulged in vice, food, drink and gambling. He had bouts of indigestion so bad it drove him to near suicide side quite frequently. He had to be carried away from banquets, overstuffed to the point of being sick and stumbling drunk. Claudius also really loved snacks, so there was a constant stream of plates and goblets flowing past Helotus all day. See, if Halotus tasted everything on this table, how did he survive the tasting? Think through the scenarios. And while you do that, I'm going to give you one other possibility. What if it wasn't a dish? What if Claudius stuffed himself with food, got indigestion and it was used to hide what really killed him? See, there's something else mentioned in the historical accounts. A long poisoned bird's feather. What if the murder weapon was slipped down Claudius throat by a malevolent doctor, a wife, a soldier, a eunuch, a doctor, two sons and a plate of mushrooms tumbling to the floor? The doctor at this table is Claudius personal physician Xenophon. He has measured and sharp blue eyes set deep under heavy brows that give him an air of quiet authority. He's in his early 50s. Not much is known about Xenophon from history, but there's a very specific account of Xenophon slipping a feather down Claudius throat just before he died. So maybe it wasn't a poison dish of food at all. Maybe Claudius was held down, his jaw wrenched open and a poison feather pushed into his throat. Xenophon had been treating Claudius ailments throughout his life, and in middle age, Claudius health was degrading significantly. It's possible that instead of poison in the dishes, Xenophon gave Claudius something that reacted badly. Was it a conspiracy that Xenophon delivered the fatal poison to subvert Halotus? Or did he accidentally overdose Claudius on medicine? Or was it possible that Xenophon and Agrippina had colluded to slowly poison Claudius over time and tonight was just the night he said succumbed? We're not sure. Let's see what other details come to light to help us decide what we are Going to see is that with Claudius in declining health, it's very possible that the cunning people around the table saw the writing on the wall, secured their alliances, to set their fate. A fate, when Claudius, inevitably passed, would be in the hands officially of one of his two sons. Agrippina could move the chess pieces around, but the title of emperor had to go to one the boys. A wife, a soldier, a eunuch, a doctor, two sons and a plate of mushrooms tumbling to the floor. This is Britannicus, his youngest, just shy of his 14th birthday. He has not grown yet into. His full stature is framed by his short, tousled dark hair, his eyes wide and innocent. He carries a shadow of uncertainty, knowing his fate hangs in the balance. Tis an unweeded garden that grows to see things rank and gross in nature possess it. Mirleght. It's 48 CE. We are in the gardens of Lucullus, crawling over nearly 20 acres on the slope of the Pincian hill, a masterpiece of Roman landscaping. They're fed by a series of aqueducts that provide water to the numerous fountains over there. And these streams, they feed the figs and the olive and the pomegranate trees. And alongside all of this blooming jasmine and the roses, the grandeur is unmatched in all of Rome. An ultimate symbol of wealth and luxury. Carefully tended terraces and statues that reflect power and elegance of the Empire. Britannicus. Here, he's just nine years old. He's a scared little boy trying to make sense of the world around him. Something terrible is about to happen. His mother has been sentenced to take her own life. There she is, there, strikingly beautiful. Her usual solid veneer is shaking. Her name is Valeria Messalina. She comes from a rich and powerful family and she truly captured the dark imagination and gossip of Rome. While married to Claudia, she threw lavish orgies here in these imperial gardens, flaunting her sexual prowess and indulgences. And then, in a move that could only be described as utterly reckless, she married Gaius Syllis while still married to Emperor Claudius in a mock ceremony that was instigating a type of soft couple. Claudius, embarrassed cuckolded, ordered her death. And as you can see, she doesn't have the courage to take her own life, so that enormous centurion will do it for her. Britannicus is a relatively mild and stable individual compared to the wild and bloodthirsty members of his family. Grew up in palace life only to watch his father execute his mother. And he was, for a while, the only successor to the Empire. Did Britannicus resent his father for effectively killing his mother. It seems very reasonable. Did he look across this dining table every night at his stepbrother who hated him and a scheming stepmother and felt his own father couldn't protect him anymore? It's unlikely, but not impossible that Britannicus poisoned his father or the revenge of his mother Valeria, and then hoped he could curry enough favor to quickly install himself. But that's a lot for a 13 year old boy. And also by this time, Claudius was starting to show Britannicus more favor. But he's just a boy. He lost his mother. His father is a drunk who's now on the ground in pain. He's being intimidated by his vicious older brother and he never stood a chance. He must have lived these moments in such fear and insistence, certainty. And you would too if you had a stepbrother like Lucius. Look at him glare across the table, toying with a sharp silver knife. Let's look at the adopted son. He's 16 years old and he hates his little brother. He's pompous, self absorbed and spoiled and has inherited all of his mother's guile. His hair is light blonde, his eyes blue and somewhat menacing. His neck is over thick, his belly prominent, his legs slender. A spoiled older bully of a brother. Agrippina fawns over him and Burrus is very protective of him. His name is Lucius, but you might know him better as Nero, future Emperor of Rome. Yes, the burning, fiddling Nero. He is the adopted son of Claudius. Agrippina had him before she was exiled to a different father at just 16. He was already showing signs of impatience and cunning. He knew Claudius was on the decline, his health in trouble. It would only be a matter of time. His mother was already aligning the support he would need to take the imperial seat. And there was just one person in the way. His whiny little brother, Britannicus. Claudius biological son. Nero could have been impatient and gone around his mother's back. He could have bribed porters. It's entirely possible that Nero and Agrippina had discussions about how to rid the world of Claudius together. But maybe Agrippina wanted to wait and Nero made other plans and Agrippina was just witness. We can imagine Agrippa Pina realize in what's happening, while Nero has a smirk as his stepfather falls to the ground. Rome is a superstitious and mystical place. Sacrifices to gods, rituals and spells and Agrippina practiced magic herself are reflections of the sorceress Morgana and her son Mordred from Arthurian legend. Both pairs deeply entwined and using sorcery for lust, betrayal and manipulation. Enchantments, rituals and offerings to the gods. You see this snake bracelet on Nero's upper arm? That's a protection charm. When Valeria Messalina was still alive, she actually sent assassins to kill Nero. But they were scared off by a snake under his pillow. Well, it turned out it was just a snakeskin and Agrippina had it changed into a magic charm. She met with soothsayers and made sacrifices. Did they predict Claudius death? She also had contacts in the underworld. And this is where things get very interesting. Did Agrippina turn to dark magic to rid Rome of her husband? There's someone else at this banquet that we didn't see before. They're looking at us from the shadows. We're in the back streets at the tabernacle, the shops at the central marketplace, the Forum Romanium in the valley between the Capitoline and Palatine hills. Normal trade of wares are out in the daylight, as you can see, but in the back rooms and undercover are clandestine dealings. There was one collaborator in that dining hall and we couldn't see her. But in a room in the back of this innocent herbarium is one of the most dangerous women in ancient Rome. She's a professional poisoner and her name is Locusta. How much for these figs? 2. 2. Locusta is an enigmatic figure in Roman history. She is believed to have been born in Gaul. Emerging from the city's criminal underworld in the first century, she became an expert in the deadly craft of poisoning, mastering the use of herbs, venoms and toxins to create concoctions that could kill efficiency. Maybe Agrippina hired her. Or maybe Nero went behind his mother's back. Or maybe Xenophon got his more potent elixirs from the dark markets. Locusta was so good at her trade that in the future, Nero and Agrippa. Agrippina will hire her again to craft a poison to kill poor little Britannicus. And then Nero, when he finally gets sick of his mother, will hire Locusta to poison her. But it doesn't work. So we're pretty sure that Claudius, growing attachment to Britannicus, threatened the future Agrippina had fought to secure for Nero. With Claudius alive, Britannicus would be his successor. The banquet, surrounded by those Claudius trusted, offered the moment for Agrippina to act decisively and ensure Nero's place on the throne. Locusta tainted a dish of mushrooms Claudius favorite, laced with a carefully crafted poison. The Emperor, unaware of the danger ate the meal that would lead to his slow and painful death, clearing the way for Nero's rise. If Agrippina knew that mushrooms were Claudius favorite meal, they would be the subtle delivery device for his undoing. A wife, a soldier, a eunuch, a doctor, two sons and a poisoner looking from the shadows. So we've met all of the dinner guests, but we haven't been introduced to this deadly plate of mushrooms. So exactly what is it that we're looking at spilling on the floor? Let's have a look at this little mushroom. What if I told you that the death cap mushroom isn't even a plant, but an alien species from space bent on world domination? Plant Murder will return after these special messages. Welcome back to plant murder. Claudius vs. The Death Cap Mushroom 10.13.54 CE Roman Emperor Claudius of failing health forces a lining against him. The stresses of managing a growing empire on his shoulders indulged his appetites in a great dinner. And it is well known that at that dinner he was poisoned by a plate of death cap mushrooms. We're in the Ciminian forest on a moonlit night. It's an ancient woodland located to the north of Rome, near modern day the Turbo. It's dense and mysterious. The death cap mushroom, which thrives in wooded areas with broadleaf trees such as oak and chestnut, is found here. And we need to be quiet as that hooded figure there is collecting them under the COVID of night. If you're the type of person who might scold me for calling a mushroom a plant and we're in the right place. They are a fungus and they have their own kingdom. Mushrooms are closer to animals than plants. These cell walls of the mushroom are made of chitin, the same substance found in the exoskeletons of insects. They breathe in oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide. Unlike plants, which produce their own food, mushrooms lack chlorophyll. They get nutrients from organic matter. So we'll carry forth and we'll treat this little mushroom as a plant pro tempore for the purpose of this episode. So this is Amanita phyllodes. I'm not casting a spell. It's a deadly death cap mushroom. They're easily mistaken from edible varieties. And they're responsible for 90% of all mushroom related fatalities. The poison works slowly, often taking days to claim its victims. They have been transported around the world, spreading this little lethal fungus far beyond its native forests, expanding its empire. Are you ready for a conspiracy? Did aliens kill Claudius? Don't laugh. Recently they hooked up a mushroom to a robot body, and it quickly figured out how to crawl. Mushroom spores have been found at every layer of our atmosphere, and they are so resilient, they could survive in the vacuum of space. If you entertain the theory of panspermia, you might wonder if spores traveled here from distant galaxies. Alien invaders quietly establishing a foothold on Earth. And if you enjoy a good paranormal conspiracy, perhaps you'll indulge in the idea that mushrooms have a vast underground network, a biological telegraph system through which they can communicate and manipulate events on a global scale, even by Roman intrigue. It's a stretch of any imagination, but who am I to dismiss the mysteries of the natural world? What I do know is this. Never forage for mushrooms unless you know what you are doing. The death cap has led to countless fatalities throughout history. These guys have taken down figures as prominent as Pope Clement vii, King Charles VI of France and composer Johann Schobert, among others. Now, you might want to pay attention to this part. The poisoning from death cap mushrooms begins with mild symptoms. They usually appear 6 to 12 hours after ingestion. The initial signs include nausea, vomiting and pain in the abdomen. So these symptoms may subside for a brief period, which is a false sense of recovery. As the toxins continue to damage the liver and kidneys, more symptoms emerge, including jaundice and confusion. Without treatment, liver and kidney failure can occur. They lead to coma and death within seven to 10 days. But something doesn't completely add up, does it? Hold on to that for later. To Romans, the hedonists, food was a celebration and the rich loved to eat mushrooms. So was it Claudius, fourth wife, the calculating and mysterious Agrippina, which orchestrated the deadly feast in which she slipped the death cap mushrooms into the dining hall. Lurking poison and treacherous wounds are more to be feared than open warfare. A wife by political convenience, his niece, an awkward, incestuous relationship. And a woman that ruled in parallel, obsessed with placing her son as emperor. A soldier, Burrus. Not just a soldier, his bodyguard, guard, in charge of his personal safety, loyal to Nero. And Agrippina, the lotus, not just a eunuch, but the royal food taster in charge of his safety, who might have looked the other way. A doctor, A physician. Xenophon, in charge of his failing health and might have delivered the killer blow. A biological son, Britannicus, 13, who was threatened by his older brother being pushed out and was shrewd enough to know the writing was on the wall. An adopted son, 17, Nero, cunning and impatient and ended Claudius to get his hands on the imperial seat. Locusta, a poisoner in the shadows who loved her trade, and a mushroom that's not a plant but a lethal fungus. The circumstances of Claudius death were recorded by three historians, Tacitus Suetonius and Cassius Dio. Much later than the events in question, Tacitus tells us the tale of conspiracy that Agrippina, Helotus and Locusta, and even Xenophon the court physician, are all embroiled. And here is the actual account from Tacitus.
Tacitus
Under this great burden of anxiety, Claudius had an attack of illness and went to Sinuesa to recruit his strength with his balmy climate and salubrious waters. Thereupon, Agrippina, who had long decided on the crime and eagerly grasped at the opportunity thus offered and did not lack instruments, deliberated on the nature of the poison to be used. The deed would be betrayed by one that was sudden and instantaneous, while if she chose a slow and lingering poison, it was a fear that Claudius, when near his end, might, on detecting the treachery, return to his love for his son. She decided on some rare compound which might derange his mind and delay death. A person skilled in such matters was selected Lucasta by name, who had lately been condemned for poisoning and had long been retained as one of the tools of despotism. By this woman's art the poison was repaired, and it was to be administered by a eunuch, a lotus, who was accustomed to bring in and taste the dishes. All the circumstances were subsequently so well known that writers of the time have declared that the poison was infused into some mushrooms, a favorite delicate delicacy, and its effect not at the instant perceived from the emperor's lethargic or intoxicated condition. His bowels, too were relieved, and this seemed to have saved him. Agrippina was thoroughly dismayed. Fearing the worst and defying the immediate obloquy of deed, she availed herself of the complicity of Xenophon, the physician, which she had already secured under pretence of helping the emperor's efforts to vomit. This man, it is supposed, introduced into his throat a feather smeared with some rapid poison, for he knew that the greatest crimes are perilous in their inception, but well rewarded after their consummation.
Aaron J. Reardon
Before dawn, Claudius was dead. The relatively stable era of Claudius came to an end, and the horrors of the reign of Nero were just beginning. Claudius, the unexpected emperor of Rome. What we can see is that Claudius was somewhat of a historical punching bag to which everyone took a swing. He was mocked and dismissed. Even Seneca, philosopher, playwright and advisor, hated Claudius and recorded his last Words as vame pudo concave me. Oh, I think I have shit myself. Rhyme, once exposed, has no refuge but an audacity. Claudius seemed to take to rule when Rome needed it most. A patient and thoughtful man bookended between two crazed, indulgent and bloodthirsty rulers, Caligula and Nero. For 13 years, the stammering, bullied and cast off Claudius righted the ship, refilled the coffers and did what no other emperor was able to do. Pierced the white shores of Britain. He created a settlement 50 miles inland from the mouth of the Thames, at the shallowest crossing known as Londinium, that one day would become the thriving city we know as London. Claudius had 35 senators and 400 others executed or forced into suicide. Did he himself drop his guard, knowing that Agrippina would someday arrange his end? An asp in a box, a dagger in the bath, or a deceptive mushroom hidden in his favorite dish? He was betrayed by those he trusted most. And as historians have agreed, Agrippina did it with her cadre of conspirators. It was almost everyone at the table. It would take collusion to accomplish the task. And why? To secure Nero in the throne and block Britannicus. Can't you see that satisfied look on her face? It seems straightforward, a well accepted tale, seemingly commonplace in the post republic era of ancient Rome. I tricked you and laid out a mystery. But it was obvious all along, done and dusted. Tacitus was right. Now we can all go home. But just one moment. What if she didn't give me my robe, put on my crown? I have immortal longings in me. We've taken a long walk, but clever detectives will see that there are some holes in this story. Let's break it down. Can we exonerate Agrippina? What if Claudius accidentally poisoned himself? Or what if he died of ill health and the historians just had a flair for the dramatic, almost out of a sense of habit. As we look deeper, we find that much of the official account may be more myth than reality. Exhibit A. Agrippina's motive to secure the ascension of Nero as emperor. Agrippina was already a co ruler of Rome with her son in the line of succession. What did she gain from a premature poisoning? Why would she be in such a hurry? In 54 CE, Nero's succession was already secure. Claudius had taken significant steps to elevate Nero. His adoption into the Claudian gens, his marriage to his daughter Octavia, and a conferral of proconsular powers. Nero had been named Leader of the youth, a signal of his future as emperor. Agrippina had little to gain from Claudius premature death and much to lose by risking a hasty transition. And if we look at Nero himself as a teenager, there's no overt evidence that he had a lust for ultimate power. He was more interested in acting and performing in chariot races. He was intensely unequipped for emperor for at least five years after Claudius died. He had a rivalry with Britannicus, who he killed eventually. But he didn't seem concerned while Claudius was alive. If Agrippina had planned Claudius murder, wouldn't she have ensured a smooth and swift transition for Nero? But instead, Agrippina scrambled to prepare for the transition. They delayed the announcement for days. Claudius death looks like it was unexpected, not the result of a carefully orchestrated plot. Exhibit Halodus and Xenophon. Both Halodus and Xenophon had successful careers after Claudius death, which would make their collusion in an assassination unlikely, as they would have been loose ends. And after that, who else would have trusted them? And if we look at the notorious feather, perhaps Xenophon had used it to test Claudius reflexes or to make him vomit up what he thought was poisoned food. Or perhaps Xenophon used a feather to give Claudius a quick end and ease his suffering. Exhibit the mushroom theory. Here is the biggest hole in the account. The death cap mushroom. If we look closer at the symptoms we discussed before, do they align with the timeline of Claudius death? Vomiting and diarrhea appear 6 to 24 hours after ingestion, not directly during a meal. That's either a very long banquet or Claudius ate the mushrooms before the dinner with his family. Given Claudius known indulgence in food and drink, it's plausible that he could have unknowingly consumed deadly fungus earlier in the day or the day before, leading to his sudden collapse. He was known to snack frequently, even yelling out, I beseech thee. How can one live without a snack? He could have just scarfed down the wrong ones by accident, completely slipping it past Halotus. And something about the death cap also doesn't add up. Only Claudius was affected, no one else at the banquet. Some accounts even state that Agrippina ate from the same dish. Claudius health was precarious his entire life. He suffered from many ailments, including possibly dystonia, a neurological condition. That condition would make him vulnerable to to the effects of muscarine, a toxin found not in the death cap, but in Amanita muscaria, which can cause severe reactions, especially when combined with alcohol. Given Roman dining culture, where Wine flowed. The combination of muscarine and alcohol could have led to a rapid and fatal reaction in Claudius, who might have been the only one affected at the dinner due to his health issues. And finally, the questionable narrative. Tacitus and Suetonius are our primary sources for this period, but they had their own biases. Tacitus in particular had a penchant for depicting women as manipulative and dangerous. Tacitus seems to relish in framing women as scheming and challenging the power base of Rome. It might have been easier to simply repeat themes from previous assassinations. Writers cannibalize their works all the time. Could Tacitus, like Shakespeare, repeat common narratives to make his writing easier? The idea of a grand conspiracy is appealing, it's dramatic and it fits neatly into the Roman tradition of intrigue. But when we look at what we know, it's just as plausible, if not more so, that Claudius death was a tragic accident. Roman society was rife with rumors, and the notion of Agrippina as a villainous poisoner fits too conveniently into the stereotype. Therefore, there is room for doubt. And here's what's missing from this story of poisoning. Here's possibly a more important what if Agrippina was a better emperor than Claudius? Claudius was in some ways an effective ruler. He built roads and ports and expanded into new territory. But in others, he seemed a bit timid and mushy. And along comes Agrippina the Younger, who just maybe wanted it more. She was the only empress to appear on coins while she was still alive. She wore military garb in public and projected more confidence and strength than he did. Maybe not a better emperor, but maybe a character more suited to the brutal environment of dynastic struggle. Maybe Agrippina has been judged harshly by history, suggesting her marriage to a weak emperor who was, because of his hesitations and terrors, a threat to the imperial authority and government. And since emperor was a male only station, she ruled from behind Claudius and positioned her son Nero in secession, who she probably thought she could control. But he was consumed with his own stardom. It's possible Claudius ate a snack and died and Agrippina just dusted her hands and said, welp, that was a freebie. Or she might have actually been fond of the old stammering fool a little. Who knows, given her own past, she might not have known love herself and saw something familiar in Claudius and someone else who'd been kicked around a bit. Maybe she dreamed it all up, staring across at the guy every night. And it all starts With a good plan. But then she sees the poor fool hunched on the ground and choking, and there's a swell of remorse. I'd like to think that, but you look at the list of untimely deaths associated with Agrippina and it's pretty impressive. It's very cutthroat, in a strategic sense. 12, allegedly. Including Valeria Messalina. That's right, Britannicus. Mother paving the way for her marriage. Or maybe it was all dark magic and alien mushrooms bent on world domination. History has not been kind to Claudius. Shakespeare immortalized him as the incestuous and murderous villain of Hamlet. The uncle who killed the father and married the mother of the troubled Dane. But can you imagine the difficulty growing up like Claudius, being bullied every day of your life in that environment and then having to ascend to leadership while still suffering such slights, no matter what you did? Almost like King George vi, whose childhood stammer accompanied him to his leadership in the dawn of the Second World War. Why is this such a common theme for us? Perhaps in this modern era of imposter syndrome, we all feel like less equipped than the shining, confident gods around us, pillars confidently seizing power and enthralling others. It's the one tale of the underdog born into exceptional privilege and possibly the only members of elite families to which we can summon any empathy. An afflicted man whose great work was ignored, or an unstoppable woman who was kept from the most powerful position in the known world. In the end, what do we truly know? Was Claudius the emperor who never wanted the throne finally undone by a dish he loved? Or by the woman who was a better emperor than he was? History may tell us one thing, but the truth that may be buried like the mycelium of the deadly mushroom beneath the surface. A woman who survived her entire family serving a tiny mushroom who packs a lethal punch, nibbled at the table by a man who rose above afflictions in a time and place that was not sympathetic to any. Maybe not the noblest, not the most sure footed or moral, but survivors. Ones that embed themselves in the great roots of power in the shade of trunks, symbiotic with the environment and consumed in the threads of forces greater than themselves. Tiberius Claudius, Caesar Augustus Germanicus, Agrippina the Younger and Amanita Philoides, the Death Cap mushroom. I am Aaron J. Reardon and this has been Plant Claudius versus the Death Cap Mushroom.
Billy Hindle
To listen to more of Plant Murder and check out their other content, please search Plant Murder wherever you get your podcasts or click the link in the description of this episode. And as always, you can visit rustyquill.com for more information. Or you can find the creator behind Plant Murder on Twitter Toad or on their patreon@www.patreon.com cleverthan that's C L E V E R T H A N Cleverton where they have clues, extras, polls and discussions. Thanks for listening.
Summary of "RQ Network Feed Drop – Plant Murder: Claudius vs The Death Cap Mushroom"
The Magnus Archives presents a compelling and meticulously detailed exploration of the mysterious death of Roman Emperor Claudius in the episode titled "RQ Network Feed Drop – Plant Murder: Claudius vs The Death Cap Mushroom." Hosted by Rusty Quill and featuring the talented narration of Aaron J. Reardon, the episode delves into historical intrigue, botanical lethality, and the dark corridors of Roman power.
The episode kicks off with Billy Hindle introducing Plant Murder, a podcast by Aaron Reardon that intersects botany and true crime throughout history. The inaugural episode, "Claudius vs The Death Cap Mushroom," sets the stage for a deep dive into the assassination of Emperor Claudius, emphasizing the potential role of the deadly death cap mushroom in his demise.
At [01:25], Aaron J. Reardon sets the historical context:
"Dusk at the Domus Tiberiana on Palatine Hill. A bronze plate falls from the table. The guests in the dining hall hush. A man stumbles. His vision doubles as delirium slips him closer to the floor."
Emperor Claudius collapses during a lavish feast, sparking immediate suspicion among his attendants. The central question revolves around the source of his sudden illness: poisoned wine, contaminated delicacies, or the elusive death cap mushrooms.
Agrippina emerges as the prime suspect. Reardon narrates her tumultuous life, marked by survival amidst political purges and personal tragedies:
"Agrippina practiced magic herself and had contacts in the underworld."
Agrippina's ambition to secure the throne for her son Nero positions her as a formidable figure willing to orchestrate Claudius's assassination.
The loyal Prefect of the Praetorian Guard, Burrus's allegiance to Agrippina and her son introduces potential internal support for the conspiracy.
As Claudius's personal food taster, Halotus's role is pivotal. The failure to detect the poison raises questions about his complicity or possible oversight.
Claudius's personal physician, Xenophon, is implicated through his intimate access to the emperor's health, suggesting he could have administered the fatal toxin covertly.
Claudius's sons represent the dynastic stakes. Britannicus, the biological son, stands to inherit the throne but is overshadowed by Nero, the adopted son favored by Agrippina.
The episode transitions to a botanical analysis of the death cap mushroom (Amanita phalloides). Reardon elucidates its deadly properties:
"They are responsible for 90% of all mushroom-related fatalities."
Amanita phalloides's symptoms align with Claudius's sudden collapse, but discrepancies in the timeline and symptom onset introduce doubt about mushroom poisoning being the sole cause.
Reardon meticulously examines historical accounts, particularly Tacitus's writings, to piece together the conspiracy. He highlights the following:
Notable Quote at [45:32]:
"Agrippina, who had long decided on the crime and eagerly grasped at the opportunity thus offered... By this woman's art the poison was repaired, and it was to be administered by a eunuch, a lotus."
Reardon challenges the traditional narrative by scrutinizing the motives and opportunities of key players:
He posits alternative theories:
"Could Tacitus, like Shakespeare, repeat common narratives to make his writing easier?"
The death cap mushroom presents a plausible yet incomplete explanation. Reardon points out:
Alternative theories suggest:
The episode concludes by urging listeners to question established historical accounts. Reardon reflects on:
"History may tell us one thing, but the truth that may be buried like the mycelium of the deadly mushroom beneath the surface."
He emphasizes the importance of critical analysis over accepting traditional narratives, suggesting that the true cause of Claudius's death might be more nuanced than a straightforward poisoning conspiracy.
Reardon leaves the audience pondering the complexities of power, survival, and historical interpretation. The episode fuses botanical science with historical intrigue, presenting a multifaceted examination of Emperor Claudius's demise while keeping the door open for alternative explanations and future investigations.
Introduction by Billy Hindle [00:00]:
"Today we are bringing you the first episode from one of the amazing podcasts that has just launched on the RQ Network, Plant Murder..."
Aaron J. Reardon [01:25]:
"Come, thou who art burdened by so many great misfortunes, utter once more thy sad lamentations surpass the kingfishers and the sweet swift nightingales..."
Historical Account by Tacitus [45:32]:
"The deed would be betrayed by one that was sudden and instantaneous... Agrippina was thoroughly dismayed."
Reardon's Analysis [47:27]:
"Before dawn, Claudius was dead. The relatively stable era of Claudius came to an end, and the horrors of the reign of Nero were just beginning."
"Plant Murder: Claudius vs The Death Cap Mushroom" adeptly intertwines historical scholarship with botanical science to explore the enigmatic death of a Roman emperor. By dissecting established narratives and presenting alternative theories, the episode invites listeners to engage in critical thought, questioning the veracity of historical accounts while appreciating the intricate dance of power, survival, and legacy in ancient Rome.