Detailed Summary of The Majority Report with Sam Seder
Episode 2254 - NYC Primaries, Trump's Not So Ceased-Cease Fire, w/ Leah Litman
Release Date: June 24, 2025
Host: Sam Seder
Guest: Leah Litman, author of Lawless: How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories and Bad Vibes
Description: Entertaining Daily Politics, Award-Winning Long-Form Interviews, and Irreverent, Independent Analysis. For more info, visit Majority.FM.
1. Introduction to NYC Mayoral Primaries
Timestamp: 04:00 – 08:00
Sam Seder kicks off the episode by highlighting the significance of the New York City mayoral primary. He emphasizes the unprecedented engagement of young voters, noting that 25% of early voters in this mayoral election have not participated in a Democratic primary since 2012. This surge signifies a youthful shift in the electorate, with "something like 50% of the people who voted so far are under the age of 44" (04:17). Sam suggests that this demographic change poses challenges for incumbent Andrew Cuomo but offers hope for broader political progress.
Key Points:
- Youth Engagement: A significant influx of new, younger voters is reshaping the political landscape.
- Candidates: The race between Zoran Mamdani and Brad Lander is intensifying, with Mamdani seen as the stronger contender against Cuomo.
- Primary vs. General Election: The primary is highly contested, setting the stage for a vigorous general election.
Notable Quote:
Sam Seder (04:17): "It's an indication of how young the electorate is, with something like 50% of the people who voted so far are under the age of 44."
2. Interview with Leah Litman: The Supreme Court’s Conservative Transformation
Timestamp: 21:38 – 67:00
Leah Litman joins Sam Seder to discuss her book, delving into the transformation of the U.S. Supreme Court under conservative influence. She argues that the Court has increasingly been driven by conservative grievances and fringe legal theories, moving away from impartial jurisprudence.
a. The Role of Justice Scalia and Milestone Cases
Timestamp: 30:44 – 37:49
Leah highlights Justice Antonin Scalia's pivotal role in sowing the seeds of the Court's current conservative trajectory. Through dissents in landmark cases like Romer v. Evans and Lawrence v. Texas, Scalia projected the "homosexual agenda" and laid the groundwork for future conservative rulings that prioritize traditional values over progressive rights.
Notable Quote:
Leah Litman (32:32): "Justice Scalia was really sowing seeds of this, particularly later in his career."
b. The Shadow Docket and Its Implications
Timestamp: 51:05 – 60:45
A significant portion of Leah’s discussion focuses on the shadow docket—the Supreme Court’s practice of making rapid decisions without full briefing or oral arguments. She notes a sharp increase in its use during the Trump administration, allowing the Court to "embolden and green light" executive actions that bypass lower court rulings.
Key Examples:
- Immigration Policies: The Court's shadow docket has been used to uphold controversial deportation orders without proper due process.
- Birthright Citizenship: Leah anticipates rulings that could undermine constitutional protections for citizenship based on place of birth.
Notable Quote:
Leah Litman (54:58): "The Supreme Court is just telling them, you're not going to face any penalty for giving lower courts the middle finger."
c. Fringe Legal Theories
Timestamp: 48:36 – 64:37
Leah elaborates on fringe legal theories like the unitary executive theory and the major questions doctrine. These doctrines grant expansive powers to the executive branch, potentially allowing presidents to act above the law and bypass regulatory agencies.
Key Points:
- Unitary Executive Theory: Asserts that the president holds broad executive powers, undermining checks and balances.
- Major Questions Doctrine: Empowers the Court to invalidate federal regulations deemed too significant to be delegated to administrative agencies.
Notable Quotes:
Leah Litman (48:36): "The unitary executive theory is just one of the more consequential fringe theories that has just become this insurgent idea..."
Leah Litman (50:19): "If the non delegation doctrine is brought back, then most of government is unconstitutional."
d. Potential Cases and Future Implications
Timestamp: 61:12 – 66:00
Leah discusses upcoming Supreme Court cases that could solidify the Court's conservative path, including challenges to the Voting Rights Act and parental rights in education. She warns that without federal protections, many rights are vulnerable to judicial rollback.
Key Cases:
- Voting Rights Act Challenges: Potential invalidation could weaken protections for minority voters.
- Parental Rights in Education: Cases could determine the extent to which parents can exclude LGBT-inclusive curricula from schools.
- Chevron Doctrine Overruled: The Supreme Court's rejection of this doctrine limits federal agencies' ability to interpret ambiguous laws.
Notable Quote:
Leah Litman (61:32): "Justice Kagan wrote in a dissent that if the non delegation doctrine is brought back, then most of government is unconstitutional."
e. Democratic Response and Potential Reforms
Timestamp: 66:00 – 67:00
Leah identifies progressive politicians who recognize the Supreme Court's shift and advocate for democratic reforms. Figures like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Jamie Raskin, and Senator Tina Smith are highlighted as leaders who understand the judiciary's impact on democracy and are pushing for necessary structural changes.
Notable Quote:
Leah Litman (66:00): "There are absolutely some, particularly in the House... that have signaled they understand what is going on with the federal courts."
3. Conclusion and Final Remarks
Timestamp: 67:00 – 76:13
Sam Seder and Leah Litman wrap up the interview by underscoring the urgency of addressing the Supreme Court's conservative leanings to protect democratic institutions and civil rights. Leah reiterates the critical need for political awareness and activism to counterbalance the judiciary's shrinking impartiality.
Notable Quote:
Leah Litman (35:51): "The problem has really snowballed since Bush v. Gore."
4. Skip Advertisements and Non-Content Sections
Per the request, advertisements, sponsor messages, and the "fun half" of the show, which include humorous banter and off-topic discussions, are omitted from this summary to focus solely on the substantive content related to politics and the judiciary.
5. Key Takeaways
- Youth Voter Surge: Young voters are increasingly influential in NYC primaries, potentially reshaping political outcomes.
- Supreme Court Shift: The U.S. Supreme Court is undergoing a significant conservative transformation, driven by grievances and fringe theories.
- Shadow Docket Concerns: Increased use of the shadow docket allows the Court to make swift, partisan decisions without thorough review.
- Urgent Reforms Needed: Progressive leaders recognize the need for structural reforms to counteract the judiciary's conservative dominance and protect democratic rights.
6. Notable Quotes with Timestamps
- Sam Seder (04:17): "It's an indication of how young the electorate is, with something like 50% of the people who voted so far are under the age of 44."
- Sam Seder (08:48): "Mamdani has the only real chance [to beat Cuomo]."
- Leah Litman (32:32): "Justice Scalia was really sowing seeds of this, particularly later in his career."
- Leah Litman (51:05): "The shadow docket refers to the set of orders, opinions and decisions that the Supreme Court issues without full briefing and without oral argument."
- Leah Litman (54:58): "The Supreme Court is just telling them, you're not going to face any penalty for giving lower courts the middle finger."
- Leah Litman (66:00): "There are absolutely some, particularly in the House... that have signaled they understand what is going on with the federal courts."
This episode provides a comprehensive analysis of the current political climate surrounding the NYC mayoral primaries and offers an incisive examination of the U.S. Supreme Court's evolving role in shaping American democracy. Leah Litman's insights shed light on the judiciary's shift towards conservative ideologies and the potential long-term implications for civil rights and democratic institutions.