
Loading summary
Daniel Murray
Welcome back to another episode of the Marketing Millennials Podcast. Today's guest, Steve Stano, a marketing leader at one of Wall Street's biggest firms. If your team's ever been seen as a cost center, this episode is for you. We talk about how to prove marketing drives revenue, how to run smarter ABM with real buyer signals, and why internal storytelling is just important as external marketing. This one is packed with practical ways how to earn your seat at the table as a marketing team. Excited for you all to listen. Welcome to the Marketing Millennials, the no BS Marketing Podcast. I'm Daniel Murray and join me for unfiltered conversations with the brains behind marketing's coolest companies. The one request I tell our guests stories or it didn't happen. Get ready to turn. Oh, what is up Steve? Welcome to the podcast.
Steve Stano
Hey man, thanks so much for having me. I'm so excited to be here. Huge fan of the Marketing Millennial. In many ways.
Daniel Murray
I want people to understand where you're coming from, so could you please give a little background? I know you've been in the financial industry for a long term work for some huge banks out there, but just give a little background like what you've done your career so people get an idea.
Steve Stano
Definitely. So I've always been within the financial services space ever since I graduated college, which seems like years ago at this point and it is, but I've really only been with two of Wall Street's largest financial services institutions in that time. And it's always been within the marketing space, whether it was supporting various businesses and leading off on financial wellness programs or product marketing, or now sitting in a seat where I'm leading a full team focusing on how do we drive the business's impact from a workplace financial solutions perspective to a corporate audience. And then in turn, how do we best engage with prospects via acquisition marketing? How do we deepen that relationship, that client relationship with the corporate from a customer marketing perspective? And then ultimately how do we wrap that all around or how do we wrap all around it through our global market intelligence program, really providing insight insights on the work that we do to help further a data driven approach.
Daniel Murray
Let's talk about that approach because one thing I know most marketers feel is their department is the first to get cut because they've seen as this huge cost. People don't really understand marketing. They don't think as it is a growth driver. They might just want to fall back on sales or other product, but they fall seem to just target marketing. So how should marketers go from Being seen as a cost center to like an actual growth driver in the business.
Steve Stano
Sure. And it's such a great question. Right. And actually I have a few stats that I think will help to bring this to life. So if you checked out PwC's pulse survey on Chief Marketing officers, what you'll find is roughly 40% of CMOs strongly agree that the value of marketing is understood. That's just 40% and by the way, that's down from 53 or 54% last year. And then this case. Right. There's obviously a huge upside to potentially increasing the value and increasing that understanding of marketing to business leadership. Equally, if you look at Gartner's recent survey on proving marketing value to the business, you'll find a few stats here. In fact, from a CMO perspective, perception of marketing's ability to provide, or rather to prove value, to get credit for the work that's done was roughly 50, 50, which again, I think was really interesting. So to me there's really four key areas to focus on. One is how do you focus on that long term holistic impact of marketing and how do you prove that value? Two is how do you build a highly tangible and understandable narrative? That's incredibly important, right? Having business leaders understand what marketing does in the words that they use. I often say no one in the business cares about impressions. I only do because I'm in marketing. But for the most part the business doesn't. Three, how do you increase the variety of metrics that you're showing to the business and how are you focusing on what matters most to them? And then four, how do you expand business involvement? I think to Daniel, to your point, you had mentioned sales, right? Sales and marketing are on the same spectrum, just different ends of it. But like those four key areas that I just laid out are incredibly important to shift the narrative of marketing being a cost center to being a growth partner to the business. And it is entirely possible.
Daniel Murray
It's actually crazy. The first stat you said about like it's first of all, it's down. But only 40% of people like CMOS think that they could prove the value of that. But it also makes me also think, and I want your perspective of how you do this internally too is like sometimes we as marketers get caught up in like external marketing, but we forget that we also need to do what we're doing externally to internally. We need to be the best advocates for ourselves because nobody else is going to be advocates for ourselves. So what are some things you've put Together to make sure like the impact has been seen by leaders, other teams, other stakeholders in the business.
Steve Stano
Yeah, sure. And you know, I love, I love this topic. It's something that I preach about internally, not just to my team, but to others. Right. We were able to build a really close strategic partnership with the business and have a seat at the table to be able to influence, you know, where the business goes based on data points that we see from a marketing perspective. And I'll tell you like a really tangible example of how to do this is we host a monthly marketing meeting featuring business leadership. Not just the head of the business and his leadership team, but also the click down from there and then plus two from there. So in that way we're getting in front of not just leadership but also those that we're working with on the day to day to ensure they understand what marketing is doing and the terms and the words that they use, focusing on the things that matter. So what does that mean? In this monthly marketing meeting we'll talk about a variety of things. It could be marketing that we're doing in terms of sales enablement, it could be upcoming webcasts or it could be the more strategic items. Which I get more excited about is how can we take our acquisition efforts and talk about paid media. Less about the performance from an activity rate or an engagement rate perspective, but more from an intent and a signal perspective. In fact, this is an area that my team is shifting to. So it's less about ABM or just ABM and more about smart abm. It's how do you apply those signal based approach to those accounts that you're targeting with an ABM perspective? So imagine you're targeting 100 different corporate through paid media efforts. That's easy and that's easy to tell that story. But imagine you're able to hone in on the 15 corporates that are showing the highest intent and then being able to bring that information to the sales team and then arming that sales team with actionable next steps based off of content that aligns to each of the different areas of intent that they're showing high, medium, low against. And that's obviously based on the keywords. That to me is how you create a significantly valuable relationship with the business. And that's how you get them to understand that marketing is a growth driver and is there to help them reach their goals.
Daniel Murray
That's just one example, one thing you're also saying which is, is very, very important. And I think we also forget this because we were so Deep in the weeds is that every internal person, there's a different language and different things that they care about. Like for example, sales, where you just said sales care about. What accounts are you penetrating? Like in B2B. What accounts are you penetrating? Are you penetrating my accounts? Or like how, how many accounts have you, have you touched in the last. How many counts have seen our paid media efforts? Like who are we trying to target now? They care about that. But if you're talking to like a financial partner, they're, they're caring about a total different metric. And if you went to talk about penetrating accounts, they might be like, what are you talking about? I just care about are you efficient? Are you like spending your money? Is it turning into value? So it's, you have to tweak your messaging to each person. And I think sometimes we, we don't want to do that because it's the easier way out or we don't have time to do it. But it's so important to tweak messaging like that.
Steve Stano
Yeah, 100% right. And it's all about finding what, what your partners care about. Right. In that example of sales, they care about what is an account or a corporate that is showing high signs of intent, signals, engagement, et cetera. For them to reach out to, for them to get the win and then secure the revenue. Business leadership is Daniel, to your point, are we doing our job? Are we doing it efficiency efficiently? Rather, are we being smart with the dollars that we have? It could be our finance partners that have a similar question or legal that we're looking to push out where we're push to push up messaging. We want to make sure they're aligned. So it's definitely different messages to different groups. But grounding it in the outcomes that we drive and that's that big shift that we've made over the course of the last year or two is how do we focus on outcomes? And it could be outcomes for legal outcomes for sales, or for servicing and honing in on a similar story, but nuancing that nuance, nuancing it based off of what they care about most.
Daniel Murray
One thing I want to get what you do internally is a lot of marketing teams have like a marketing team dashboard and then one that they show to other teams the key metrics. So what are things that on your marketing team dashboard and what are you, what are the like broken down metrics that you're showing to leadership to other teams? Like what are the, the comparative so people understand you can have both. But two of them are Showing a different picture.
Steve Stano
Sure, sure. And we definitely have two different, two different dashboards. So the dashboard that we show to marketing leadership, it focuses more on impressions, engagement rate, activity rate, cost per lead, all those metrics to be able to prove that marketing spend is driving some sort of impact. And maybe that impact is mql. Right. And I have my own separate opinions about that. It could be an MQL or it could be account engagement and list penetration. So that's all about like the dashboard for our marketing for marketing leadership versus that of business leadership. It's the accounts that have been, that have been penetrated. It's the accounts that are showing signal and high to medium to low intent. But then it's also being able to show the connection of what accounts have been, what accounts have been penetrated, what percentage of those accounts have engaged with our content and then in turn what percentage of those accounts are being engaged by sales? In fact, true example, when we did a report last week to show or to share an update on our paid media efforts, we saw 75% of the accounts we were targeting had penetration. We saw roughly 60 to 65% aggregated were engaging with our content. But guess what? Only 32% of those penetrated accounts were being engaged by sales. So from a marketing perspective, that means we have to continue to warm and nurture those other ones to keep them ready, to keep them sales ready for the sales team to end up reaching out like that to me is the marketing to sales story that we're trying to tell while also caring for the messages that we have to share to our respective leadership, whether it's marketing or business leadership. So that way we're arming them with the data points that are needed as they go off and have their own conversations.
Daniel Murray
One thing I want to do for like the non B2B or non B2B that do ABM. Could you just describe what is like an ABM approach? What is account based marketing? Because I know people are saying might be thinking account penetration, what is that? Like how do I, what does account penetration? What does that look like? So how do you think about, like, how do you think about abm and what is like, what is account penetration? What do people actually, what are you actually looking at when you say account penetration?
Steve Stano
Absolutely. So I'll kind of root this in real example. So account based marketing, this is all about looking at accounts that are most important to the business, like in just kind of the most basic language, if you will. So let's use private companies as an example. There are thousands of Private companies out there, whether early stage startups, all the way to late stage pre IPO companies, but where the business is strategically focused, at least for the firm that I'm at, is call it in the mid to late stage private companies. So for us, we work with our sales partners to identify those corporates, those accounts, if you will, that are mid to late stage private companies. And in turn what we end up doing is we end up identifying this audience of let's say 500 to 600 different accounts, different corporates, and then we target them through two different approaches. Right. And I should note, ABM comes in three, kind of comes in three ways. One is a one to many approach, then a one to few approach, and then a one to one approach. We play mainly in the one to many and one to few from a budget perspective. So from A From a one to many perspective, we'll reach out to all five to 600 different private company accounts and invite them to a webcast. It could be a webcast on any topic. We're just looking to see who comes and who ends up engaging, so that way we could follow up in the future. Well, what we then do is we get far more targeted in our ABM approach, and especially that one to few, if you will. And we're looking at those accounts that are showing signs of engagement, those accounts that we're looking to nurture further because they're high value and we believe that there's an intent to convert to a sales ready conversation. We then put them in front of our sale, in front of our leadership partners, whether it's product or on the business, whether it's AI or if it's on the markets, to be able to have a conversation, a live conversation like the one we're having now, Daniel, and getting them exposure to our, to our different partners so that they could see the value of what the firm brings. What that does is it takes that one to few approach and provides a more intimate session via targeted virtual forum. So I just share those examples, kind of those basic examples of how we take abm, how we actually deploy it from a one to many approach and then how we deploy it from a one to few approach.
Daniel Murray
And usually in abm you're segmenting the accounts based on hey, these are the highest priority or the bigger whales we want to go after for the bigger accounts and they're segmented. And then the approach based on the one to many or one to few can change based on how you're going after those specific accounts. But also I one Thing you said that is very valuable is you want people to take small actions before the big action. So like attending say like a virtual event or something else you're doing, it's high signal that they, they're taking a next step of intent with you as a, as the company. So I think people always try to go for that, especially in abm. Like especially probably the accounts you're targeting, they have long sales cycles, long. And you have to warm them up over months and months. You can't just try get in the door one second and you'll close that.
Steve Stano
Yeah, 100%. Right. And again keeping with the example of private companies, early stage private companies startups are likely to make a purchasing decision for the product that we market in roughly let's say one to three months. Late stage pre IPO companies are taking far longer. It could take two, three plus years. Then public companies take even longer than that. Right. So for us it's very much how do we warm and nurture over time. But the one thing that I do want to go back to that I actually started the conversation at is we've evolved from a B2B marketing perspective over the last two years where we used to spray and pray if you will. We then evolved to ABM account based marketing. Now what? Now what I think now where the future is going in the course of the next few months and even in the next year is how do we create smarter abm? So how do we use let's say an MQL that's been submitted and then how do we append that with those signals? And to me, and this is a hypothesis, we haven't proved it out yet, if you engage MQLs that are showing high intent, even medium intent at scale, you are far more likely to see significantly higher conversion to a sales ready conversation than that of an MQL that's being submitted. And I think over time we have to evolve away from MQLs. It is not enough to just say hey, I'm submitting a form, I want to be contacted. That to me is a, is a legacy way of thinking. It is far more powerful to utilize different data points to really hone in on those accounts via your ABM approach that are really showing signs of making that purchasing decision. And if you're doing that, you're being far more efficient with the limited budget, with the limited resources that you have allocated to your, to your team and your business.
Daniel Murray
The problem is that the marketing qualified that comes in the mql. There's so many definitions of that in different companies where like some companies like okay, filled out a con, a content download that's an mql. Some companies it's like strict, they meet my form field requirements on my form but usually those high intent ones that actually are becoming MQOs already doing the research before and already have done the research. So you, everything you did beforehand with all the the other marketing efforts probably led them down to that effort. If you're only tracking mqr you you're losing all of that stuff where they buyers are smart. Now we have AI, now we have Google, we have a marketing campaign marketing acquaintances around here. So usually those people have made a decision when they've came to you. Your job is to like before they make that decision be as top of mind as possible and show them as many different type of educational products ahead of time.
Steve Stano
No, absolutely. And that is, that is our ultimate goal. But the interesting part is and Daniel, you made a really great point, a large majority and there's actually a stat here and I don't have it off the top of my head. I think it was somewhere around 70 to 80%. Don't quote me on it though. 70 to 80% of purchasing or rather decision makers have already made a purchasing decision in their minds before they even start looking or before they even start researching. That to me is an incredible stat, right. And I can't again remember who published that stat or where it came from. But to me what it's saying is you need to make sure that you continue to have high brand awareness. If you have high brand awareness, high sustained brand awareness, then you're part of that conversation, if you will. When that 70 to 80% of decision makers are already figuring out what their purchasing decision is. What is far more important and where my team is spending a lot of our time now is how can we move folks through or how can we move prospects through consideration to decision and consideration is likely far lower than awareness. But man, imagine if you're able to keep that high sustained awareness and increase your consideration by 10 to 20%, you're likely going to see a far greater number of corporates, corporate prospects getting to the decision phase and ending up making a purchasing decision that is likely in your favor.
Daniel Murray
Break that on the statue. Let's say internally you say I want to move 10% of people from that state to that stage. How does that look from going back to what we originally talking about, how does that look like I need to like what marketing efforts do I need to do? How do I communicate finance to get me some budget to do this. What does that look like? You've already come up with that stat, that, that target as a marketing team. So just like reverse engineering from, hey, I want to move let's say 5%, 10% from these stage. I need to do X, Y, Z marketing tactics. I need XYZ budget to do that. Now I have to have a conversation to get that. What does that look like?
Steve Stano
Yeah, and, and listen, like, like literally, Daniel, to your point, reversing it, it's how, what are the results that we've seen, what produced those results, what cost went into those results or what cost went into that work that was done and then proving it out. So literally, it's almost like you're turning the funnel upside down, if you will. Once you start by targeting your key accounts, you're engaging them with marketing. You show results and you show results. You just flip it. Then you show the results, you show what was done and then ultimately what you end up needing and who you would end up targeting. So to me, it's a very similar story. It's just a different angle that let's say finance cares about. But that's ultimately what you need to do to end up moving a corporate through the funnel in terms of looking for more budget or in terms of getting additional resources. But if you were to say, Steve, how do you move somebody from awareness, consideration to decision? It comes down to intent and then it comes down to the targeting and it comes down to all the outreach that's done, whether it's through marketing or for sales. Awareness is easier to build, consideration is harder to influence, and then ultimately decision. There's so many factors that go into it, but all of your marketing efforts work in unison. And if you have all your marketing efforts working in unison at the same time and you're orchestrating them, then you're creating that halo that ultimately will drive awareness, consideration and decisioning higher.
Daniel Murray
Yeah, like people forget because for example, paid media budget, get X impressions impression doesn't necessarily mean someone saw or paid attention to that piece of content. It just means that it was served in the feed of someone who is your target audience. So that's like a lot of attention is cheap. So if you can get like strong attention, like getting people to take action for attending a virtual event or attending a live event or attending like those are more stronger action points that someone paid attention to. You, you, they got in front of you, they took taking a next action. Because when you don't see any signal and sense of that, some People. That's why creative is the new targeting, because it's hard to like impressions. A lot of the impressions are just like they're guaranteeing you distribution, but they're not guaranteeing you attention. And that's the problem. And that's why people forget that, like, just because you get impression doesn't mean actual people are paying attention.
Steve Stano
Yeah, I, I agree. And at that point. Right, maybe that helps to build brand awareness. But if we're getting 40 million impressions impressions, as an example, and you get less than 1% converting, then what are we doing versus, let's say getting 10,000 impressions, if you will? I know it's kind of drastic difference, but getting 10,000 impressions of those that you actually care about and of those that you actually care about, having 5% convert or 5% engage, that to me is so much more powerful. It's very similar to what I say to my team. My team will say, oh, this webcast didn't have a high number of attendees or a high number of registrants. Okay, that's fine. Because if you focus on the quality, then that's a much greater story. I much rather have 100 people register and attend a webcast that we hold for those corporates that we care about versus 10,000 register and attend for those that we don't care about. It all comes down to the accounts. The targeting though, focusing on those that you care most about, focusing on your. The different approaches, proving out the story to marketing, business leadership, and finance. That's what it comes down to, and I think it ultimately is. Where are your priorities? How do they align to the business? If the business is looking to, let's say, spray and pray, if they're looking to just get anyone, then Great, we'll take 10,000 of any corporate that's out there. If they're looking to focus more heavily on the quality that's coming in, then to me it is far more powerful to get that thousand or that hundred than a much larger number.
Daniel Murray
What do you think the biggest mistake a lot of marketers get stuck on? When they're in cost center mode or being seen as cost center, they're not.
Steve Stano
Understanding the way to tell marketing story in a way that business, finance and other leadership members will understand. It goes back to the conversation we're having around impressions. For marketing leadership. We care about impressions. For everyone else, we don't. And that's where marketing gets stuck. Not everyone understands marketing. It's important to use the words and the language that they use to convey messages to their team. That is the big blocker.
Daniel Murray
Instead of saying I got a thousand impressions, you could say a thousand people in these X companies have seen a piece of content we put out or like attended a webinar. Instead of like, you just got to change. You can't talk marketing to. Even us marketers get. When we're creating content, we try to like assume that everybody understands what we are understanding. Like the terminology we use in everyday language when we talk to our own team. But not everybody talks like that. So we have to simplify it. I want to. I have a question. If you taking over a new team right now that is seen as a cost center, what are like three. Three things that you would do to get them out of that situation as a marketing team?
Steve Stano
Sure. First, I would meet with business leadership and you better understand their priorities real quick. Two, I would orient your team around what are your reasons to exist. I think a really good model to use is the the McKinsey strategy house that breaks between what is the mission, approach, priorities and enablers for your team. And then the three is the third rather is to start incorporating the business's language within your presentations and building those key relationships with. With partners. Like it all comes down to if you have a relationship with business leadership, you understand their priorities, if they understand what the hell you're doing and then you orient to how they're thinking and the way that they're speaking. There's. I don't want to say guaranteed, but there is a higher probability that you are able to shift marketing's view from call center to being a strategic partner. The one thing I will say is that takes time. Do not expect that to happen overnight. That is a continuous pattern that you have to maintain for at least six months to a year. So it ends up resonating with folks because they may already have a perception of the team that is going to be hard to break.
Daniel Murray
I always say to people, like when we're doing advertising and marketing, we're showing people the same things five, six, seven, eight times, like over and over. But sometimes we forget that it's okay in every single meeting to bring up the same things that we're saying over and over just to get it in people's heads. And also there's always a new person in the meeting or new people. So we need to keep repeating over and over why we're doing things. This is why we. Why we care about this thing. This is our goals, this is the values of the marketing team. So you just get it in their heads and we Just seem to forget that we need to do this type of marketing internally all the time. And marketing is not just one time telling people like, this is a metric. It's like your month weekly marketing meeting, your weekly email. You need to continually be in people's heads to understand that one, you exist as a marketing team, two, you're actually making impact that they care about, and three, you're moving metrics that they care.
Steve Stano
About as business leaders 100%. And you know what's funny about that is once you get to the point where they trust you and you know what they do, then you almost find that the business, that your business partners get a little bit more quiet because they know exactly what you're doing. They trust you to do what you need to do. And while that could be a little scary, I think that also gives you white space and a greenfield opportunity to be able to explore more. At least that's something that I'm thankful for with my team over the course of the last year, or the last two years rather, where we've gotten, where we've got that white space, that greenfield opportunity to try new things because the business trusts us and they know exactly what we're doing and when we're doing it and how we're doing it and the impact that we drive.
Daniel Murray
Yeah, I think two things that you said were really important is one is like once you are building that trust, you have more leeway as a marketing team to take risks. So that's one. And then two, you have more leeway to make mis. Make mistakes. If people understand what you're doing as a marketing team, like, and understanding is a way that you're, you're attempting to do, do stuff that drives a business result. So I think that that's super important. Lastly, I want to ask you is ask everybody on this podcast, but what is a marketing hill you would die on?
Steve Stano
Oh God, that is a great one. A marketing hill I would die on. I have to tell you, I think it would be this hill. This hill being marketing is not a cost center. It is a driver of growth. It is baked into the, I'll say the blood, but it's baked into the DNA of this team and the way that we speak and we speak from a data driven perspective. If we are making a decision to go out with X message or produce Y piece of content or produce zed piece of video or whatever it may be, it has to be rooted in data. That is the hill that I'm willing to die on. Or maybe it's Two hills. Right. Marketing being a driver of growth and everything has to be rooted in data and balancing being. That's a subjective and objective partner.
Daniel Murray
Yeah. It's always strange to me that it is even considered a cost center because it's like you invest money in R and D to make a product better. You invest in stuff like that. But like, this is an investment for like, like an actual output. There's like, I mean, banks should be the easiest ones to understand this. You put money into an account like you. There's an expected return of that.
Steve Stano
Yeah.
Daniel Murray
So if you think of marketing like a stock portfolio and like you putting money into. Some are those risky stocks that might go to zero, but some are those like S&P 500, the Magnificent Seven, which you know are going to keep growing over time. So I think you got to think like that.
Steve Stano
Absolutely.
Daniel Murray
Well, where could people find you and what you're doing?
Steve Stano
Sure, definitely. And I appreciate that and thank you so much again for having me on so folks could find me on LinkedIn. Steve Stano, feel free to add me there. There's a number of other videos and conferences and podcasts that I've done, whether it's focusing on global intelligence or rather global marketplace intelligence, or if it's about driving marketing's view as growth or even just where APM is going, that's where you can find me.
Daniel Murray
Super. I mean, yeah, go follow Steve. I mean, he's, he's been a marketing leader for, I mean, at this, the bank that you're at for like over 10 years, you've worked at other banks. It's like super impressive that and I honestly believe anybody who could stay at a company that long, like, is doing, making impact because you don't stay in like leadership roles for long if you're not making impact.
Steve Stano
So. Amen. Amen, man.
Daniel Murray
Well, thank you so much for being on the pod.
Steve Stano
Yeah, thank you for having me.
Daniel Murray
Thanks so much for listening. Keep tuning in to hear more great insights from the coolest marketers from around the world. If you haven't already, make sure to subscribe and follow the Marketing Millennials podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube or wherever you get your podcast. And if you like what you hear, I would greatly appreciate you giving us a five star rating. It helps bring more marketers into our community. SA.
Podcast: The Marketing Millennials
Host: Daniel Murray
Guest: Steve Stano, B2B & SaaS Marketing Leader at a major Wall Street financial firm
Episode: Ep. 331
Release Date: July 11, 2025
In this insightful episode of The Marketing Millennials, host Daniel Murray welcomes Steve Stano, a seasoned marketing leader from one of Wall Street’s largest financial services firms. The conversation delves deep into the challenges marketers face when their departments are perceived merely as cost centers and offers strategic approaches to reposition marketing as a pivotal growth driver within organizations.
Steve Stano shares his extensive experience in the financial services sector, emphasizing his long tenure with top Wall Street institutions. He highlights his diverse roles within marketing, from leading financial wellness programs to spearheading acquisition and customer marketing strategies. Steve currently oversees a team dedicated to driving business impact through workplace financial solutions and enhancing corporate engagement via acquisition marketing.
“I’ve been with two of Wall Street's largest financial services institutions, focusing on driving business impact from a workplace financial solutions perspective to a corporate audience.”
— Steve Stano [01:28]
Steve addresses a prevalent issue in the marketing industry: the tendency to view marketing departments as cost centers rather than growth drivers. He cites a PwC pulse survey revealing that only 40% of CMOs feel the value of marketing is understood, a decline from 53-54% the previous year.
“Roughly 40% of CMOs strongly agree that the value of marketing is understood. That’s just 40%, and by the way, that’s down from 53 or 54% last year.”
— Steve Stano [03:02]
To combat the negative perception, Steve outlines four key strategies:
“How do you shift the narrative of marketing being a cost center to being a growth partner to the business? It is entirely possible by focusing on these four key areas.”
— Steve Stano [03:02]
Steve emphasizes the importance of internal advocacy. Marketers must proactively communicate their value and align their messaging with the language and priorities of different departments.
“We host a monthly marketing meeting featuring business leadership... ensuring they understand what marketing is doing and the terms and the words that they use.”
— Steve Stano [05:46]
Acknowledging that different teams prioritize different metrics, Steve describes maintaining separate dashboards:
“For marketing leadership, we focus on impressions and engagement rates. For business leadership, it’s about the accounts penetrated and their engagement levels.”
— Steve Stano [10:57]
Steve provides a comprehensive overview of ABM, illustrating its application through targeting mid to late-stage private companies. He describes his firm's dual approach:
“ABM comes in three ways: one-to-many, one-to-few, and one-to-one. We primarily operate in the one-to-many and one-to-few due to budget considerations.”
— Steve Stano [14:00]
The discussion shifts to customer journey stages—awareness, consideration, and decision. Steve underscores the necessity of nurturing leads over extended periods, especially with long sales cycles typical in financial services.
“Early-stage private companies might decide in one to three months, while late-stage pre-IPO companies could take two to three years.”
— Steve Stano [16:48]
Challenging the traditional Marketing Qualified Lead (MQL) framework, Steve advocates for a more nuanced approach that incorporates intent signals to prioritize leads. This method enhances efficiency and conversion rates by focusing on leads demonstrating higher intent.
“We need to evolve away from MQLs. It is not enough to just say hey, I’m submitting a form. We must utilize different data points to hone in on accounts showing purchasing intent.”
— Steve Stano [18:35]
Highlighting the inefficiency of mass impressions, Steve argues for prioritizing quality engagements over sheer volume. He shares an example where targeted impressions yielded significantly higher engagement compared to broad, untargeted efforts.
“Getting 10,000 impressions with high engagement is far more powerful than 40 million impressions with a 1% conversion rate.”
— Steve Stano [24:31]
As marketing departments demonstrate their value, they earn trust from business leadership, granting them more freedom to experiment and innovate. This trust fosters a collaborative environment where marketing can take calculated risks and explore new strategies.
“Once business leaders trust you, they give you white space to explore more.”
— Steve Stano [30:14]
Steve identifies a critical mistake: failing to communicate marketing’s value in terms that resonate with other departments. He advises marketers to:
“The biggest mistake is not telling the marketing story in a way that business, finance, and other leadership members will understand.”
— Steve Stano [26:24]
Steve passionately asserts that marketing should never be seen as a cost center. Instead, it must be recognized as a growth driver grounded in data-driven decision-making.
“Marketing is not a cost center. It is a driver of growth and everything we do has to be rooted in data.”
— Steve Stano [31:37]
Daniel Murray wraps up the episode by commending Steve’s impactful career and inviting listeners to connect with him on LinkedIn. Steve plans to continue sharing his expertise through various platforms, including conferences and additional podcasts.
“Feel free to add me on LinkedIn, Steve Stano. I’ve participated in several videos, conferences, and podcasts focusing on global marketplace intelligence and B2B marketing strategies.”
— Steve Stano [33:20]
“Marketing is not a cost center. It is a driver of growth.”
— Steve Stano [31:37]
“We need to evolve away from MQLs. It is not enough to just say hey, I’m submitting a form.”
— Steve Stano [18:35]
“Understanding the way to tell marketing story in a way that business, finance and other leadership members will understand.”
— Steve Stano [26:24]
Whether you're grappling with internal perceptions of your marketing team or seeking advanced strategies to prove your department’s value, this episode with Steve Stano offers actionable insights and proven methodologies to elevate marketing's role within your organization.