Ep. 1525 - Trump Just Dealt A Massive Death Blow To Gender Ideology

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Matt Walsh Show — Ep. 1525: Trump Just Dealt A Massive Death Blow To Gender Ideology

Release Date: January 29, 2025
Host: Matt Walsh
Platform: The Daily Wire
Description: Fed up with the talking heads? Matt gives you a no-holds-barred take on today’s cultural, religious, and political issues. Monday thru Friday.

---

1. Trump’s Executive Order on Gender Ideology

Overview:
Matt Walsh dives deep into President Donald Trump’s groundbreaking executive order aimed at dismantling the gender transition industry, particularly focusing on protecting children from gender-affirming medical procedures.

Key Points:

• Comparison to Lobotomies: Matt draws a parallel between the historical use of lobotomies in the 1950s and current transgender medical practices, labeling both as "barbaric medical experiments" (00:00). He emphasizes that, like lobotomies, transgender procedures on minors are irreversible and harmful.

• Details of the Executive Order:

  • Terminology Shift: The order redefines "gender-affirming care" as "chemical and surgical mutilation" (00:00).
  • Rejection of WPATH Guidelines: Federal agencies are mandated to cease reliance on the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) guidelines, which Matt critiques as lacking scientific integrity (10:30).
  • Legal and Financial Ramifications for Hospitals: Institutions receiving federal funding must end these practices or risk losing substantial grants (15:45).
  • DOJ Involvement: The Department of Justice is tasked with enforcing protections against these medical procedures, potentially leading to criminal actions against practitioners (18:20).

Notable Quotes:

• "This dangerous trend will be a stain on our nation's history, and it must end now." (22:10)
• "We're not going to rest until you are punished for what you've done." (23:05)

Impact and Conclusions:
Matt asserts that this executive order is one of the most significant in U.S. history, poised to halt the progression of gender ideology by removing legal protections for medical practitioners and paving the way for future legislation. He calls for a federal ban to solidify these changes permanently.

---

2. Explanation of Drones on the East Coast

Overview:
Matt discusses the recent clarification from the Trump administration regarding the mysterious drones that had been causing public concern over the East Coast.

Key Points:

• Press Briefing Details:
  • Speaker: Carolyn Levitt, new White House Press Secretary (24:55).
  • Explanation: The drones were authorized by the FAA for research and included hobbyist and recreational drones (24:55).
  • Public Reaction: Matt critiques the Biden administration for withholding information, suggesting intentional misinformation to distract the public (25:20).

Notable Quotes:

• "So, that's the answer we're told, to the drone mystery, which should be major headline news, shouldn't it?" (26:00)
• "The Biden administration could just tell us, but chooses not to." (26:30)

Impact and Conclusions:
Matt is skeptical of Levitt’s explanation, implying that the Biden administration may have wanted to obscure the truth to manage public perception and distract from other issues. He suggests a deliberate lack of transparency as a hallmark of the current administration.

---

3. Jim Acosta Quitting CNN

Overview:
The podcast covers Jim Acosta’s departure from CNN, highlighting his final statements and Matt’s unfiltered reaction.

Key Points:

• Circumstances of Departure: CNN’s decision to move Acosta from his daytime slot to midnight, which he refused, leading to his resignation (24:55).
• Final Statements: Acosta emphasizes the role of the press in holding power accountable and urges listeners to “hold on to the truth and to hope” (24:55).
• Matt’s Reaction: Describes Acosta as a "dork" and mocks his final message, criticizing his lack of impact and emotional disconnect (24:55).

Notable Quotes:

• "There's never a good time to bow down to a tyrant." (24:55)
• "Good Lord, what a dork." (25:42)

Impact and Conclusions:
Matt ridicules Acosta’s resignation, portraying it as a futile and unimpressive act. He underscores his disdain for Acosta’s perceived ineffectiveness and lack of resonance with the audience.

---

4. Homeless Man’s Confession for Train Attack

Overview:
A tragic incident involving a homeless man who attack a woman by pushing her in front of a moving train is discussed, with Matt analyzing the motivations behind such acts.

Key Points:

• Incident Details:

  • Perpetrator: Marquis Brazilis, 26, admitted to the attack saying, "I pushed her into the train because I was high and I was mad. I did it because I wanted to." (57:51)
  • Legal Outcome: Massachusetts court hearing and the man’s chilling confession.

• Matt’s Analysis:

  • Nature of Evil: Argues that Brazilis’s clear and deliberate motive indicates inherent evil rather than mental instability (62:00).
  • Reform Impossibility: Asserts that individuals like Brazilis cannot be reformed and should be permanently removed from society through legal means (63:30).
  • Punishment: Suggests severe consequences akin to those for human rights atrocities, emphasizing societal and legal accountability (63:30).

Notable Quotes:

• "He did it because he wanted to. That's it." (57:56)
• "He will be a danger to society forever. He will be a liability forever." (63:30)

Impact and Conclusions:
Matt categorically labels the perpetrator as an irredeemable evil person, advocating for his permanent removal from society. He dismisses mental health as a sufficient explanation, emphasizing personal responsibility and moral culpability.

---

5. Trump’s Freeze on Foreign Aid and Criticism Over AIDS in Africa

Overview:
The podcast addresses the Trump administration's suspension of foreign aid and the subsequent backlash from Democrats regarding the handling of the AIDS epidemic in Africa.

Key Points:

• Freeze on Foreign Aid:

  • Action: Trump has paused all foreign aid, aiming to end indefinite financial support for other nations (55:00).
  • Democratic Criticism: Congressman Dan Goldman accuses Trump of neglecting global health issues like AIDS, malaria, and famine, labeling the freeze as “an abdication of our duty as a global leader” (63:00).

• Matt’s Perspective:

  • National Priorities: Questions why American taxpayers should fund AIDS relief in Africa, arguing that domestic issues should take precedence (64:00).
  • Effectiveness of Aid: Contends that foreign aid is largely ineffective, citing ongoing AIDS epidemics despite decades of assistance, suggesting that aid money often fails to produce sustainable results (64:10).
  • Moral Objection: Stresses that the U.S. is not obligated to solve other countries’ problems, emphasizing self-reliance over perpetual assistance (64:50).

Notable Quotes:

• "Why should working class American taxpayers have to pay to fight AIDS in an African country 7,000 miles away?" (64:00)
• "If you need US Aid in order to exist as a country, if you cannot function as a country without US Aid, then you don't deserve to exist as a country." (64:25)

Impact and Conclusions:
Matt champions the freeze as a necessary move to prioritize American interests, arguing that foreign aid is a misuse of taxpayer dollars and fails to address underlying issues in recipient countries. He calls for the U.S. to withdraw all foreign aid, fostering national self-sufficiency.

---

6. Review of Netflix’s “American Primeval”

Overview:
Matt provides his critique of "American Primeval," a western series on Netflix, highlighting its strengths and weaknesses from his conservative viewpoint.

Key Points:

• Positive Aspects:

  • Solid Storytelling: Praises the show as one of the few quality westerns in the last two decades, free from "woke clichés" (50:00).
  • Character Development: Appreciates the traditional archetype of the mysterious drifter who embodies classic Western hero traits (55:00).

• Critical Observations:

  • Violence and Bleakness: Notes the show’s excessive brutality and over-the-top bleakness, particularly in its final episodes (60:00).
  • Representation of Native Americans: Critiques the portrayal of Indians as warlike and brutal, with minimal positive representation, calling it only slightly better than modern standards (58:20).

Notable Quotes:

• "It never lapsed into most of the woke cliches that you expect." (60:00)
• "The show is very brutally violent. And I think in a way that for the most part is justified by the storytelling." (61:00)

Impact and Conclusions:
While Matt acknowledges the show’s adherence to classic Western elements and commendable storytelling, he criticizes its portrayal of violence and Native Americans. He concludes that despite its flaws, "American Primeval" stands out in contemporary Western media.

---

7. Lawsuit Against Lyft Over Obesity Discrimination

Overview:
The episode covers the lawsuit filed by a 500-pound aspiring female rapper against Lyft for refusing her access to a standard ride due to her size.

Key Points:

• Incident Details:

  • Complainant: Dejao Blanding, known as Dank DeMoss, alleges that a Lyft driver refused her ride, deeming her too large for his mid-sized sedan (57:51).
  • Legal Basis: Her attorneys argue that rejecting passengers based on weight is akin to racial or religious discrimination, violating Michigan’s protected characteristics (64:26).

• Matt’s Commentary:

  • Refutation of Discrimination Claim: Compares weight-based rejection to racial or religious discrimination, asserting that obesity is not an inherent characteristic like race or religion (64:35).
  • Personal Responsibility: Emphasizes the physical impossibility and health implications of maintaining such a weight, criticizing the plaintiff’s lifestyle choices (64:50).
  • Mockery of the Lawsuit’s Validity: Dismisses the lawsuit as untenable and predicts the plaintiff’s personal decline due to her weight (63:40).

Notable Quotes:

• "By law, it would be no different than a driver pulling up and saying, you know, I don't want to have black people in my car or I don't want to have Christians in my car or Muslims in my car." (64:39)
• "Full figured folks. That is now the euphemism for 500 pound human beings." (64:52)

Impact and Conclusions:
Matt vehemently opposes the lawsuit, framing it as an overreach and trivialization of genuine discrimination issues. He underscores the importance of personal responsibility regarding health and dismisses the legal claims as absurd and unjustifiable.

---

8. Conclusion and Final Remarks

Overview:
Matt wraps up the episode by reinforcing his stance against the issues discussed, encouraging listeners to support The Daily Wire’s mission.

Key Points:

• Consistency in Conservatism: Emphasizes the importance of maintaining consistent conservative values in fighting cultural and political agendas.
• Call to Action: Urges listeners to join The Daily Wire movement to support truthful journalism and cultural resistance.

Notable Quotes:

• "We are not here to follow the narrative, we're here to crush it."
• "The fight for truth and culture starts with your support."

Impact and Conclusions:
Matt reinforces his commitment to combating societal and political issues through The Daily Wire, encouraging active participation from his audience to sustain the movement against prevailing cultural trends.

---

Overall Summary:

In Episode 1525 of The Matt Walsh Show, Matt tackles a spectrum of pressing issues from President Trump’s decisive executive order targeting gender ideology to controversial incidents involving public figures and everyday services. Highlighting Trump’s aggressive stance against gender-affirming care for minors, Matt draws historical parallels to underscore the gravity of the administration’s actions. He critiques the Biden administration’s handling of drone incidents and condemns perceived media corruption illustrated by Jim Acosta’s resignation from CNN.

Matt doesn’t shy away from discussing societal breakdowns, exemplified by his analysis of a violent crime committed by a homeless individual, which he attributes to inherent evil rather than mental illness. He also scrutinizes the suspension of foreign aid under Trump, challenging the efficacy and moral obligation of supporting international health crises like the AIDS epidemic in Africa.

Expanding into media criticism, Matt reviews Netflix’s American Primeval, praising its adherence to classic Western themes while critiquing its portrayal of violence and Native Americans. The episode culminates with a contentious lawsuit against Lyft for alleged obesity discrimination, which Matt dismantles by questioning the legitimacy and fairness of such legal claims.

Throughout the episode, Matt employs a confrontational and unapologetic tone, advocating for conservative values and personal responsibility. He reinforces his opposition to what he perceives as overreaching liberal policies and media narratives, calling on listeners to actively support The Daily Wire in their quest for truth and cultural integrity.

---

Note: All timestamps correspond to the provided transcript for accurate reference.

Transcript

[Matt Walsh]

Today on the Matt Walsh Show, President Trump has issued an executive order that will crush the gender transition industry once and for all. It's one of the most important executive orders ever written. We'll talk about it. Also, the Trump White House provides an explanation for those drones that were terrorizing the east coast for weeks on end. Trump puts a pause on all foreign aid. Now he's being accused of not caring enough about the AIDS epidemic in Africa. A serious question why is that America's problem to solve? And a woman sues Lyft after a driver tells her that she's too fat to fit into his car. Talk about that important case and much more today on the MATT Walsh Success is not built on resolutions those are made to break. It's built on taking action and building unstoppable momentum. When it comes to optimizing your health span, living better and longer, certain things are non negotiable. Quality sits at the top of that list. And in the world of performance focused supplements, Momentous stands alone. Their commitment to NSF certification means every batch undergoes rigorous testing for heavy metals, harmful additives and label accuracy. It's why they've earned the trust of all 32 NFL teams and leading collegiate sports dietitians nationwide. While other brands chase trends and flood the market with endless options, Momentous takes a different approach. They rely on research and expert guidance to focus on what truly matters, mastering the fundamentals with unwavering consistency, and then tailoring supplementation to your specific goals. Speaking of fundamentals, protein and creatine form the cornerstone. Momentous sources Creapure, the highest grade creatine monohydrate available, an essential supplement for both men and women seeking peak physical and cognitive performance. Are you ready to start living on purpose? Then visit livemomentous.com and use code WALSH for 20% off your order today. Here's a little history on barbaric medical experiments that you probably weren't taught in school. In the early 1950s, lobotomies were having something of a heyday. In the United States, approximately 50,000 lobotomies were performed in just a couple of years. Doctors were eager to drill holes into people's skulls and carve out brain matter. But the United States was an outlier in this regard. Elsewhere in the world around the same time lobotomies were being outlawed, the Soviet Union banned lobotomies in 1950, with officials saying the practice was contrary to the principles of humanity because it turned people into, quote, idiots. Soon afterwards, countries like Germany and Japan followed suit with their own bans and lobotomies. But the United States never implemented a similar ban of its own. To this day, there is no federal decree banning lobotomies, believe it or not, even though it's universally recognized as a grotesque procedure that has a permanent catastrophic effect on some of those vulnerable people in Society. Now, in 2025, of course, this is something of a moot point. Lobotomies are not performed in the United States anymore. Thankfully, people become hollowed out 50 IQ shells of their former selves through a steady diet of TikTok and Netflix instead of lobotomies. But at the same time, we do have a kind of modern analog to lobotomies in this country. For the past decade or so, the idea of transgender medicine has taken hold in pretty much every major hospital. Like lobotomies, so called trans medicine promises to fix a serious mental problem by artificially modifying and in some cases, carving up the human body. And like lobotomies, oftentimes these transgender procedures are performed on children. And we've documented many times hospitals all over the country have provided cross sex hormones and puberty blockers to minors in order to affirm their subjective sense of gender and to make a lot of money as well. Of course. And in some cases, hospitals have gone beyond that. They've offered full on surgeries as well, including double mastectomies and vaginoplasties to children under the age of 18. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is not a right wing talking point. I mean, I think we've all established now pull up research papers from, say, Boston Children's Hospital, and you'll find that they've admitted to performing dozens of double mastectomies on minors. Jazz Jennings was 17 years old when surgeons mutilated his genitals and created a fake vagina in its place. So there's no denying it. As was the case with lobotomies, children are being permanently disfigured in the name of junk science. But as of yesterday, the analogy to lobotomies ends there. That's because this time around, the Trump administration has made it very clear that we're not going to wait for the whole rest of the world to ban this barbarism. We're gonna do it ourselves. Now, thanks to four years of Democrat rule, we are still once again behind much of the Western world here, where in many cases this stuff has already been outlawed. But better late than never. And it has now been declared at the highest levels of government that there is no justifiable reason whatsoever. To castrate, sterilize, or mutilate a young child in order to affirm that child's alleged gender identity, which is a meaningless, invented, and completely unscientific concept in the first place. We're going to lay the groundwork for massive lawsuits against the butchers who have taken part in this affront to common sense and human decency. We're going to stop forcing taxpayers to subsidize the quacks behind this fraud. We're going to empower the DOJ to pursue criminal action against anyone who mutilates the genitals of a child. And that's just the beginning. Now, all of these tenets were outlined in the executive order that Donald Trump signed yesterday, which is entitled Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation. Now, to be clear, this is distinct from Trump's other orders on gender ideology, which we've already discussed previously. Trump has banned trans identifying people in the military. He's established that there are only two genders. He's eliminated all forms of DEI in the federal government. But as important as those orders are, this one is even more expansive and far reaching. And it's not an exaggeration to say that Trump, I think, has just signed one of the top five most important executive orders in the history of the United States, at a minimum. So let's go through this in detail, and as we do, I'll make it clear what this order does and what it doesn't do. So, to begin with, the order defines gender affirming care as the equivalent of chemical and surgical mutilation, which encompasses everything from surgeries to puberty blockers and cross sex hormones. So right away, the federal government has just eliminated the Biden administration's endorsement of gender affirming care, and now we've replaced it with much more accurate terminology. And if that was the only thing this executive order did, it would already be a significant, huge win. But of course, it does a lot more than that. So the order then makes by far its most important contribution to ending gender ideology in this country. And I'll read a bit from the order here, and I'll explain why this matters so much. Quote, the blatant harm done to children by chemical and surgical mutilation cloaks itself in medical necessity, spurred by guidance from the World Professional association for Transgender Health, wpath, which lacks scientific integrity. And the order then states that all federal agencies, including hhs, must rescind any and all reliance on WPATH guidelines. And then it states that the new HHS secretary, quote, shall publish a review of the existing literature on best practices for promoting the health of children who assert gender dysphoria, rapid onset gender dysphoria or other identity based confusion. Now, on the surface you might think that this particular part of the order isn't necessarily that important, but it's actually critical for two reasons. First of all, as I've outlined at some length before, WPATH is and has always been an organization full of dishonest and demented charlatans. The internal WPATH filed as reported by Michael Shellenberger, demonstrated very clearly that WPATH understands that children can't consent to chemical or physical castration. But they pushed it anyway, in part because the Biden administration encouraged them to do so. And yet major hospitals have adopted WPATH guideline for so called trans medicine wholesale over the last few years. This is happening for a very specific reason. Doctors, including gender doctors, are terrified of one thing, which is malpractice lawsuits. Because malpractice lawsuits can bankrupt doctors. They can destroy entire hospitals if they're big enough. So you know, there's a lot of risk involved in sterilizing or castrating a child, a lot of financial risk. At the same time, these doctors desperately want to perform these procedures because they make a lot of money for the hospital. As you might remember, I found a video of a Vanderbilt doctor saying exactly that, that these things are a cash cow. So the solution that these gender doctors have decided on is to defer to the self appointed experts at wpath. And they know that if they can point to an established, quote, standard of care from some governing body, then they're basically immune from malpractice lawsuits, because that's how malpractice law works. If doctors can show that they were just following guidelines, then you can't sue them even if they've done something horrible to you, like castrate you as a child. And that's why this Trump executive order is so important. Because from this point forward, the WPATH guidelines are no longer the standard of care by any definition. The federal government and its healthcare agency, the hhs, has just publicly rejected everything that WPATH stands for. The White House and HHS have just labeled WPATH junk science, which is exactly what it is. So doctors can no longer hide behind WPATH's guidelines to avoid malpractice lawsuits. And right away that's going to cause their malpractice insurance to go through the roof. It'll dramatically enhance their liability, and eventually it will make them stop these procedures entirely because it's just not financially sustainable. But just in case it doesn't. The Executive order contains this provision. Quote, the head of each executive department or agency that provides research or education grants to medical institution, including medical schools and hospitals, shall immediately take appropriate steps to ensure that institutions receiving federal research or education grants end the chemical and surgical mutilation of children. So, in other words, if a hospital receives any kind of federal funding, which every major hospital does, then they need to stop castrating, sterilizing children. Otherwise, they stand to lose hundreds of millions of dollars. And in fact, they might lose even more than that because the order continues by mandating that, quote, the Attorney General shall review Department of Justice enforcement of section 116 of title 18, United States Code, and prioritize enforcement of protections against female genital mutilation. And additionally, the Attorney General must, quote, in consultation with the Congress, work to draft, propose and promote legislation to enact a private right of action for children and the parents of children whose healthy body parts have been damaged by medical professionals practicing chemical and surgical mutilation, which should include a lengthy statute of limitations. So taken together, these two provisions don't just make it easier for victims to sue doctors who perform these barbaric procedures. They also open the door for the federal government to investigate and even imprison doctors who mutilate the bodies of children. As you may remember, around 20 years ago, the left claimed that it cared about female genital mutilation in Africa, so they passed a law outlawing the practice in the United States. But now, under the guise of trans medicine, female gender mutilation is supposedly progressive somehow. So now the Trump administration is threatening to use that criminal law to go after these gender doctors. At the same time, the Trump administration is also cutting any kind of government sponsored insurance that would cover these practices. Now, having said all that, I need to make it clear that this executive order, as momentous as it is, does not by itself ban child sterilization and mutilation in this country. It makes it far more risky for doctors to perform these procedures. It suggests that the DoJ might be launching criminal investigations soon, and it makes it a lot harder for some of these hospitals and insurance companies to collect taxpayer money. But it's not a direct ban by itself. Outside of the many states that have banned this insanity already, it remains legal in places like California, Minnesota, and so on. And on top of that, if Democrats retake the White House in four years, they can reverse all of this. So Trump has done the absolute maximum of what a president can do on this issue. He can say with absolute sincerity that he has done everything he can to put an end to this insanity. But to finish the job, he's gonna need help. He can't do that all on his own. So therefore, what's needed, as I've said many times before, is a law, a federal law, banning these procedures nationwide outright. This is clearly an ideal moment to advance a national ban like that. Because gender ideology is now less popular than it's ever been. Trans activists have been utterly humiliated and rejected on the national stage. They haven't even really mustered any kind of sustained outrage about Trump's previous executive orders dismantling their ideology. So it stands to reason that they would be powerless as Congress passes the kill shot, which is a complete and total ban on chemical and physical mutilation in the name of gender ideology. Now, as the executive order itself states, quote, across the country today, medical professionals are maiming and sterilizing a growing number of impressionable children under the radical and false claim that adults can change a child's sex through a series of irreversible medical interventions. This dangerous trend will be a stain on our nation's history, and it must end now. Just a year ago, as a man pretending to be a woman led our nation's federal health agency, it was easy to doubt that this moment would ever come. Now, I've said for years that child gender transitions will eventually be a thing of the past, and nobody will want to admit that they ever supported it or tolerated it. Now that time is almost here, the barbarism of child gender butchery is on its very last legs. And very soon, you're not going to be able to find a single person in the country who admits to having ever supported it. For the sake of millions of confused and vulnerable people all over the country, and in particular for the sake of children, we have no choice now but to finish the job. Now, I want to say one other thing about this. The child butchery business is collapsing, and soon it will be gone, it will be ash, and history will look back on it with horror and shame and confusion. But I want to be clear about something, that if you're a doctor or a medical professional or a therapist or a psychiatrist who pushed this insanity on children, if you participated in and profited from the psychological and physical abuse of children, this is not over for you. You don't get to just move on. Those of us who have been fighting you for years will not let you just walk away scot free. We are not going to rest until you are punished for what you've done. Now, what you deserve is a military tribunal and the sentence that is given to those who commit human rights atrocities. But that probably won't happen. So instead we will settle with seeing that you are bankrupted and humiliated and shamed and ostracized and forever alienated from civilized society. We will not forget you. We will remember your names. For as long as there are people in this country who must live forever with the damage you inflicted on them as children, then you also should have to live with the consequences. Those children cannot pretend that this never happened, and so neither should you. Hopefully you've noticed that the conservatives you've had to deal with in this fight are a bit of a different breed. We tore down your whole industry piece by piece. We did exactly what we said we would do. We beat you. And so now when we say that we're going to make sure that you are held accountable for your crimes against humanity, you should know that we mean it and we will do it. So this isn't over. I promise you that. Now let's get to our five headlines. Look, like most of you, I enjoy shooting guns in my free time and have a lot of fun doing it. But my friends at Silencer Shop told me that they could help my guns be even more enjoyable. Shooting suppressed isn't just quieter, it's better. Suppressors reduce noise, tame recoil, and make your time at the range or in the field safer and more fun. Once you've tried it, you'll wonder how you ever shot without one. That's where Silencer Shop comes in. They don't just sell silencers, they make your firearms better and your life easier. Silencer Shop helps more Americans get suppressors than anyone else because they make it so simple. Yes, suppressors are legal, and whether you're new to the process or a seasoned pro, Silencer Shop's expert team will guide you every step of the way. Now's the perfect time to take the plunge. It's tax season. Let Uncle Sam chip in, upgrade your gun collection, use your tax return and get a suppressor and transform your shooting experience. Silencer Shop makes it ridiculously easy. They handle all the complicated paperwork for you. Their nationwide dealer network lets you get started in minutes, and you could be shooting suppressed in no time. So don't wait. Visit silencershop.com waltz today and make your firearms quieter, safer and better that silencershop.com walls silencer shop is the easiest and best way to get your suppressor. Yesterday was the first White House press briefing of the new Trump administration. The new White House press secretary Carolyn Levitt had her debut and she did a nice job. The makeup of the room for the press briefing looked different than what we usually have seen. And because Trump is allowing outlets other than the typical legacy media outlets into the room, they're still in the room, but he's also allowing others. The Daily Wire is there now with our excellent reporter Mary Margaret Olahan. And they also announced that there will be a new media seat, which, which, which I think is the idea is they're going to give one day passes to, you know, various figures in new media to attend press briefing, which of course means that I have to apply, right? I mean, I have to do it, don't I? I have to get into the press briefing room and try to ask a question. Now, granted, it won't be as fun for me as it would have been had I got press credentials during the Biden administration, because then I could troll, you know, Biden's press secretary, which would have been a lot of fun. The trolling takes on a different tone when I actually like the people. So it's a friendlier troll, which is just, frankly, not as fun. But either way, I feel like I do have an obligation. So we'll have to look into that. But for now, I wanna play one moment from the briefing. Levitt, as promised, as promised by Trump, revealed the truth behind those drones that had everybody freaking out for like a month. And Trump had promised that he would look into it and whatever he finds out, he'd let us know. And so she opened the press briefing by giving us the update. And here it is. After research and study, the drones that were flying over New Jersey in large numbers were authorized to be flown by the FAA for research and various other reasons. Many of these drones were also hobbyists, recreational and private individuals that enjoy flying drones. In time, it got worse. Due to curiosity. This was not the enemy. So that's the answer, we're told, to the drone mystery, which should be major headline news, shouldn't it? I mean, people were obsessed with the drones for a month, weeks on end, about the drones, and now Trump is coming out with a statement to explain what was all about. And, you know, and people are like, yeah, whatever. And this is how it goes. We go from caring obsessively about something to not at all. And like, we don't even stop. There's no stopover in between. There's no pit stop along the way from caring obsessively to not at all. It's either care obsessively or not at all. There's no, like, mild interest. That's not a. That's not a gear that, you know, we have in the Internet age. It's just how the news cycle works, I guess. Now, granted, the explanation Trump gives is quite boring. These are drones authorized by the faa, combined with hobbyists and recreational drones. And if that's the case, it of course raises a question, which is why didn't the Biden administration just say that, you know, if the drones were authorized by the faa, the FBA would have obviously known that, and so the Biden administration would know that, which would mean that there was never any mystery about the drones. From the moment people started asking questions about it, the Biden administration knew exactly what it was, but they didn't just say that. They didn't tell us. Now, there is another explanation here, of course, and a lot of people on social media are just kind of refusing to believe that this explanation is correct. They're saying that there must be something that we're not being told. There must still be more to the story, and that might be the case, I don't know. But I actually find it extremely plausible that this, that there was a benign explanation for this that Biden just refused to give us. That is also very plausible. I mean, that tracks, right? That's the kind of totally gratuitous disrespect for the American people that you would expect from the Biden regime. You know, something is happening. People are asking about it. The Biden administration could just tell us, but chooses not to, chooses to let people panic needlessly. Why? Well, in part, it's because it was a nice distraction. And I think for the Biden administration, anything that distracted people from the fact, from the failures of the Biden administration was a positive. So there was that. But also, I think they just had a contempt for the American people, and they resented the idea that they should have to explain anything to us. So if people were living in New Jersey and feeling a bit vulnerable, not sure if there was some sort of. These were Chinese drones, if there was some kind of attack, Alien. Alien attack, I think the Biden administration looked at that and they said, I don't care. Yeah, I don't care if they feel that way. Yes, we could easily say something that would calm these fears, but we're just not going to. So that tracks. To me, that is perfectly believable, but who knows? All right, now we have some tragic news. CNN anchor and longtime Trump hater Jim Acosta made the announcement on a show yesterday that he is quitting it was his last show. And the background here is that CNN wanted to move Jim Acosta from his daytime slot to midnight. I think he was on at 10am and they wanted to move him to midnight, which is, I mean, that's how much faith and pride the CNN brass had in Jim Acosta. That, that's how, you know, right, that you're, you're doing a great job on tv. When your bosses come to you and say, we, you know, we want to, we want to move your time slot, how far do you want to move it? About 14 hours. We want to just push it back a bit. About 14 hours, you know, and because there are probably about 10 people watching CNN at midnight, which is only half of their primetime audience. So it's a pretty steep drop. And so Acosta wouldn't do it. Acosta would not allow his show to be moved to midnight, which is a little surprising considering that Jim Acosta, no offense, is a blood sucking vampire goblin. So you'd think that midnight would be perfect for him as a brainless zombie. You'd think that the graveyard shift would be right up his alley. But he said no. And so he gave his dramatic sign off yesterday. Here it is.

[Jim Acosta]

There's never a good time to bow down to a tyrant. I have always believed it's the job of the press to hold power to account. I've always tried to do that here at cnn and I plan on going doing all of that in the future. One final message. Don't give in to the lies. Don't give in to the fear. Hold on to the truth and to hope. Even if you have to get out your phone, record that message. I will not give in to the lies. I will not give in to the fear. Post it on your social media so people can hear from you too. On. I'll have more to say about my plans in the coming days. But until then, I want to thank all of you for tuning in. It has been an honor to be welcomed into your home for all these years. That's the news. Reporting from Washington, I'm Jim Acosta.

[Matt Walsh]

Good Lord, what a dork. I mean, I know this is not the most profound insight, but what a dork. This guy is just a dork. Like, this is. I don't condone bullying, but. But this is why you need. This is why bullies fill a role in society. This is someone who just needs to be shoved into a locker. Like, this is someone who just needs to have his head dunked in a toilet and be shoved into a locker I'm not condoning it. I'm not saying that should happen. I guess I did just say it should happen, but that's not figuratively, like metaphorically, in a totally metaphorical, non physical sense. He needs to have his head dunked in the toilet and hand shoved into a metaphorical locker. Just a dork, you know, Take out your phone, post this message on your social medias. I will not give in to the lies. You know, he's trying to start so. And nobody posted that, by the way. Not a single person. He's trying to start a movement. Post it on your social media. No one. No one did. Not a single person did. You could tell he wanted this so badly, to be his network moment, right? You know, his I'm mad as hell, I'm not going to take it anymore moment. He wanted this to be an iconic. This is iconic. Defiant, bold, brave. You guys didn't remind me to turn this off. That's on you. He wanted this to be his defiant moment and it just didn't work. And instead it was just lame and boring. And on top of that, he fumbled over his words multiple times. So huge dork. And that's it for Jim Acosta. I can only imagine that seeing him leave so abruptly was very upsetting for his viewer. So my condolences to that person and we'll wait to see what Jim Acosta does next. I mean, no one is waiting to see what he does next. Nobody cares. But I'm sure we'll hear. Anyway. Here's something a bit, a bit. Some heavier news here. New York Post reports the homeless man who allegedly shoved a woman into the path of a moving Manhattan train made a chilling confession, telling cops, I did it because I wanted to. A court heard Yesterday Marquis Brazilis, 26, brazenly admitted to tossing the 23 year old victim into an on an incoming A train at the 168th street station shortly after he was arrested for the savage Monday morning attack. He told cops, I pushed her into the train because I was high and I was mad. I did it because I wanted to. Now when people tell you why they do things, you should believe them. And we heard it from this guy directly. Why did he randomly throw a woman in front of a train? Well, because he wanted to. That's it. That's the reason. And I've been saying this exact thing for a long time. Violent and dangerous vagrants roaming the streets who do terrible and violent things. Why do they do it? Well, it's not because they're victims of systemic Racism. It's not because of their socioeconomic situation. It's not even because they're crazy. Guess what? I know we like to think that all these people committing random acts of violence are crazy, but they aren't. A crazy person cannot speak so clearly and rationally about their motives. A crazy person doesn't know why they do things. This guy does. He did it because he wanted to. Why did he want to? I have no idea. I can't relate to that desire. I've never had the desire to throw anyone in front of a train, so I don't know why he wanted to, but he wanted to. For whatever reason, he had the free will, the ability to not do it. He could have not acted on that perverse, dark desire, but he did. And why did he act on it? Because he's evil. That's why he's a bad person. This is an evil person. He causes pain and suffering just for fun, just because he wants to. And that's what we call an evil person. We used to understand that human evil exists. That's a thing. People are evil. Evil people are out there. There are evil people in the world. Not everything is a matter of mental health. You know, of course, these days we like to take any terrible thing that someone does, and you hear from both sides of the political aisle about there's a mental health crisis in America. Mental health. This is about mental health. It's no, you know what it is? Very often it's just, these are bad people. They're just bad people who do bad things. This is actually not a problem that could be simply solved with drugs. And that brings us to some other hard truths about this guy. And mainly it's this, that he almost certainly cannot be reformed. Him and everyone like him, you know, all the violent vagrants and people walking around committing random acts of violence, they cannot be reformed. He will be a danger to society forever. He will be a liability forever. Now, no human being is outside the mercy of God. Anyone can be forgiven and transformed and redeemed. I certainly believe that. But that's between him and God. We as a society can never trust that he's reformed. We can't know that. God can know that, but we can't. And so there will never be a time when we can safely and reasonably assume or trust that he can be assimilated back into society. There will never be a time when I would feel comfortable standing near train tracks with this guy around. Which means that the only solution is to permanently remove people like this from society. And I mean that through the legal process, through the courts, lawfully, in accordance with the Constitution, these people need to be permanently removed from society. It's the only answer. There is no other answer. Like we talked about yesterday, Trump had one idea for solving that problem, one idea as to how we permanently remove someone like this from society, and that is ship them overseas, set up essentially a penal colony somewhere, set up a prison camp somewhere in some country, preferably a really, a rough country, the kind of country you don't wanna be in, and send them there and just, that's where he's gonna live until he dies. And we're just gonna forget that you exist. Society will just forget about you. And, you know, you'll be given three meals. Well, maybe not three meals, but you'll be given food. You'll be given food on a daily basis. You're not going to starve to death, but it's going to be a miserable life. It's going to be a horrible life, and then you're going to die and you'll be buried in an unmarked grave and we'll never think about you again. That is the fate of someone who, like, if you're the kind of person where we have to worry that if you're the kind of person where I can't stand next to you on the train, by the train tracks, then you are the kind of person who deserves to be sent to a prison camp and to die and to be forgotten and to just die. That's what you deserve. And so maybe, I don't know, it's. It kind of seems far fetched that we'll actually see this happen, that we're gonna start shipping criminals to some prison camp in Uganda somewhere or something. It seems far fetched, but hey, I mean, if you had told me that Trump would be as productive as he has been in the last two weeks, I would have thought, well, that's, I mean, that's not even possible. So maybe this will happen. We'll see. Trump's freeze on foreign aid has brought out all the expected sob stories. And we're now hearing from the media and the Democrats that Trump in particular is failing in his duty to fight AIDS in Africa. So this has become a talking point now. There's been a lot of reporting about how the AIDS epidemic will be made worse without foreign aid. Democrat Congressman Dan Goldman tweeted as much. He said Trump's freeze on all foreign aid is an abdication of our duty as a global leader, that money fights aids, malaria and famine, including in Sudan. Now this indiscriminate freeze will cause more people to die. Like his blanket pardons. It's a small minded, dangerous and harmful. Now, I asked Dan this question on X and still haven't gotten an answer, shockingly. But let me pose it here again. It's a simple question for Dan, or, you know, for anyone. Here's the question. Why should working class American taxpayers have to pay to fight AIDS in an African country 7,000 miles away? Why is that our problem to solve? Because I'll be honest with you, when I think about all the pressing concerns and problems that need to be solved, I know we always hear about AIDS in Africa as one of the great epidemics that we should all really be concerned about. But when I think about all the problems that are most pressing to me as an American citizen, AIDS in Africa doesn't even make the list, it's just not on the list. Now, I have no ill will towards people suffering from AIDS in Africa. I wish them the best. But I care first and foremost about the people who are suffering in my own country. And I have an obligation to my family, my friends, my community and my nation. I have no obligation to Sudan. None at all. Like what is. That's maybe another way of phrasing the question. Just taking myself as an American citizen, what is my personal obligation to Sudan? What is it and where does it come from? In what way am I obliged to help Sudan? The answer is that there is no obligation. And this is to say nothing of the fact, the perhaps most relevant fact, that the aid money going to allegedly fight AIDS in Africa and these other things is obviously not working. You know, when we talk about foreign aid, of course the reality is that most foreign aid is a scam anyway. It doesn't even go towards the thing it's supposed to, allegedly. I mean, why does, why does Africa still have an AIDS epidemic? The Western world has long since gotten AIDS largely under control. So why can't Africa figure it out? It's a serious question. Why can't they figure it out? And at what point are these countries expected to stand on their own two feet and take care of themselves? At what point? Never. Never Is that the answer? So is it our job forever, forever to sustain these countries and solve their problems for them? Forever, really? Well, if, if you ask Dan Goldman, that's what he would say. I mean, he wouldn't say that out loud because he knows how it sounds, but that is his answer. His answer is that you, as an American citizen have a permanent obligation to Sudan that will last Forever. And again, he won't say it because he knows that sounds insane and it cannot possibly be justified. But that's what they think. Because here's the thing. It's not like we're being told that we need to give these countries a little help to get them over the hump and get them back on their feet and then they'll be good to go, right? We're not being told that. That's not the pitch. No, what we're being told implicitly is to keep giving them our money forever, permanently forever. Because they will just never be able to take care of themselves. Which means that not only are we as taxpayers getting totally bilked and scammed, but also the money isn't accomplishing anything in the long term, clearly. I mean, for how long have we been, have we been giving taxpayer money to AIDS in Africa? How long has this been going on? Decades. And it's still an epidemic. How is that possible? How is this problem not under control by now? And what makes you think that continuing to give money will help anything if it hasn't done anything yet? You know, give a man a fish and feed him for a day, Teach him a fish and feed him for life, you know, is the old, the old saying. And okay, well, why can't these people fish, right? You know, when I was in Kenya, I remember driving through the towns and seeing just these massive piles of trash, massive mountains of trash in the middle of every town, right? And this is one of the reasons why they struggle with diseases that the rest of the world has mostly eradicated because the hygiene and the basic cleanliness is non existent. But it's like, why can't you figure out basic trash removal? Okay, can we, to use the left's phrase, can we have an uncomfortable conversation about some of this stuff? Let's have an uncomfortable conversation. Why can't you figure out trash removal? This is one of the most basic fundamental skills required to build a functional civilization. Civilizations that existed 3,000 years ago figured that out with technology that was 3,000 years old. So why can't Kenya, like, why can't you solve that problem? Why haven't you solved it? Waste management, we're talking about like a training wheel level skill. And Kenya gets like a billion dollars a year in USAID or something. A billion dollars a year, every year for decades. And they don't know what to do with their trash. So my point is that the aid is not, it's obviously not, obviously not building a sustainable, healthy, thriving Africa. And that's what I would like to see. I'd like to see that happen. I'd like for every country in the world to be healthy and thriving and sustainable. I wish for nothing but the best for every country in the world. That's what I would love to see. But the point is that we can't do that for you. It's not our job, it's not our obligation and we can't do it anyway. So at a certain point, these countries need to figure out how to stand on their own two feet. And which is why Trump has temporarily put a freeze on foreign aid, which is great. I think that the freeze should be permanent. I think we should withdraw all foreign aid from everybody. Because, and I've said this before, and I know how it comes across to some people and of course, I don't care how it comes across. If you need US Aid in order to exist as a country, if you cannot function as a country without US Aid, then you don't deserve to exist as a country. Okay, then you're a country that effectively doesn't exist already. You are a puppet. You're a, you're a failed state. That is Weekend at Bernie's on the international stage. Look, you're already a dead, you are a dead country. If you need welfare payments permanently from American taxpayers in order to exist. And so I think the only solution is to just let the chips fall where they may take out, revoke all US Aid from everybody and let these things shake out. And maybe if you're a country that can't be sustained on your own, then probably what ends up happening is that a stronger country comes in and takes over, which is how the world worked for thousands of years. If you can't take care of yourself, if you can't stand on your own two feet as a nation, then some other country is going to come in and they're going to conquer you and they're going to, they're going to take, that's just the way it works. Which is, would, would be hard to lament as any great tragedy considering you, you, you, you had all this time to figure out how to exist as a country and you couldn't figure it out. So, you know, maybe the, it's a dog eat dog world out there. And so maybe that's a process that we should just allow to play out a little bit. Because if the other option is that we have to take food out of our children's mouths forever to prop up all of these countries who by the way, do nothing for us, give us nothing in return and don't even display even the faintest hint of gratitude ever. You know, if that's the alternative, well, then that's just not an acceptable alternative. I hate to say it. I mean, I don't hate to say it, actually. Let's get to the comment section. It's one weird that none of these proud Mexican patriots want to live in Mexico. Yeah, that is a strange thing, isn't it? There are a lot of people in this country who are deeply proud of the countries that they came from, that they desperately fled from, and are terrified of the prospect of going back to it, and yet they're proud of it. I'm so proud of my home country. Okay, well, then you can go back to it. No, not that. Anything but that. And you're proud of them. It's like. It's like saying you're proud of your family, but under no circumstances will you ever invite any of them over for Thanksgiving. It's like, I don't know. How proud are you? Replace Jefferson with Trump on Mount Rushmore? No, that, that. Look, I think Trump, I've said if Trump repeals the income tax, if he figures out a way to. Which he can't do on his own, of course, but if he can lead the fight to get rid of the income tax, he deserves to be on Mount Rushmore, which I stand by. You can make an argument. Even if that doesn't happen, if Trump just keeps up somehow this pace that he's on right now for four years, you can not only make an argument, but I think it would be very much obviously the case that he would deserve to be on Mount Rushmore for that, but. And hopefully you could just add them. I mean, there's, there's. I think there's enough room on the mountainside to, to add them. If, if for some reason, it is an interesting kind of fun little thought experiment. If. Let's just say for some reason you, you were not. You couldn't. You can't add someone. You'd have to carve his face over one of the faces that's already on Mount Rushmore. Then who. Who has to go in favor of Trump? That's a fun. That's a little bit of a. That's a fun game, I would say. You can't get rid of Jefferson. I mean, Jefferson stays. George Washington stays for me. Teddy Roosevelt, a personal favorite president, he has to stay. So really, I mean, Lincoln is the odd man out. I think in that case, Lincoln's gotta go. Sorry. Sorry, Abe. You know. Yeah, you Got a lot of. He's got plenty of other monuments. I think he's done pretty well for himself posthumously. So that would be my vote. If you got. If you got to vote one of the Mount Rushmore presidents off the island or off the mountainside, then it would probably be him. You know, let's see. Matt, I don't know if I missed it, but did you ever come back to give the rest of the review for American Medieval? American Primeval is the name of the show. We'll be quite interested what you thought of it as a whole. Yeah, well, thanks for reminding me. I did finish it. And I'm happy to report that American Primeval, the new western series on Netflix, did in fact stick the landing. Having seen the whole series now, and it takes us a while, we don't, you know, my wife and I, we. This thing people do where they binge a whole series in a day and a half, that's just. I don't know how you do that. I mean, your brain starts to turn to mush and leak out of your ears at a certain point, watching that much tv. So it takes us a little bit of time to get through a series. So we did finally finish it. And I could say that it's a very solid show. It's easily one of the few quality westerns of the last 20 years. And one of the best things that Netflix has put out, which low bars in both cases, but still very, very, very solid show. It never lapsed into most of the woke cliches that you expect. The lead female character, which this is the thing that I found to be most surprising about the show is that the lead female character never really became the kick ass action hero Mary sue type of character that that character always becomes. In like every show and movie these days, you know, you have a. In any show where it's kind of an action thing and there's the lead character's a female and she's encountering bad guys and stuff. In almost every case, either she starts off right out of the gate as some ass kicking ninja, or at the very least becomes that through the course of the show. But in this case, they resisted that temptation. Now there's one scene, I'm not gonna spoil anything. There's one scene that kind of borders on that trope a little bit. But if you watch the show and you see that scene, it, you know, it's forgivable. It's a forgivable. It's, I think, justified in the context of the story. But other than that, You've got this classic kind of mysterious drifter guy who you have in all the great Westerns, you know, all the great. Most of the great westerns, anyway, the lead male character is this mysterious guy that doesn't talk a lot and, you know, gruff and masculine and you don't really know anything about his past, you know, and he comes off as maybe a bit cruel at first, but through the course of the story you see that underneath all that, he really is a good man. But anyway, he's the ass kicker. And so in this show you have that character and he is constantly saving and bailing out this woman and her child through the whole series, right down to the last moment, which again, I'll try not to give you spoilers, but right down to the last moment he's there protecting her and her son. So I thought that that was good. It mostly avoids the woke stuff with the Indians in the show by modern Hollywood standards. The evil white man themes, by modern Hollywood standards, are kept to a minimum. The Indians are portrayed as warlike and brutal, which is what they were, which to a certain extent everybody was back then, especially on the frontier. There is a female Indian chief who is like the wise sage and is a pacifist and somehow speaks perfect English too, which is never explained. And that's pretty silly. I mean, that's. It's the wokest that the show gets is with that character. But it's, you know, I think it's, again, I would call it forgivable. It's kept to a minimum. You know, you can kind of look past it. The only thing I'll warn you about is that the show is very brutally violent. And I think in a way that for the most part is justified by the storytelling, it does at times go overboard with the brutality and the bleakness. There's one thing in particular, the very end of the show, the last episode, there's this subplot of a husband who, in the first couple episodes, his wife is abducted. And so he's trying to find his wife through the entire show. And in the final episode they encounter each other. And that. That goes in a direction that is so bleak that it's. It's almost. You almost have to laugh at it because it's so. It's so over the top depressing that you're almost like, really? That. So there is a little bit of that in the show. And. But so if you find that sort of thing overly upsetting, then I wouldn't watch the show. For me, I have a fairly high Tolerance for bleak and brutal stuff in stories. Personally, for a story like this, I'd prefer it go overboard in that direction than in the other direction. I'd rather err on the side of being a bit too brutal and too bleak than in sanitizing it too much. That's just me finally talking about the Nancy Mace situation. People change. I personally used to be a leftist until 2020, when I started to see the error of my ways thanks to the George Floyd movement. Well, yeah, look, people change. And you saw the error in your ways because of the Floyd stuff. Actually, now that you mention it, Nancy Mace did not see the error in her ways from that. Even a year after Floyd's overdose, she was tweeting about how George Floyd had been murdered. Okay. A year later. But in any case, yeah, people change. You know, the problem with Nancy Mace is that she flipped on the trans issue and then immediately positioned herself as a leader on that issue. And then, as we talked about, started to try trying to recast the whole argument in feminist terms. But even leaving that part aside, which to me was. Is the main problem, you know, that's the main thing, is that you are using feminist ideology, and feminist ideology based Is feminist ideology is gender ideology. And so now you're trying to use that and recast the fight against gender ideology in gender ideology terms, and that I can't allow you to do that. You can't come in at the last moment and screw everything up by basically accepting the premise of the gender ideologues. I can't let you do that. But even leaving all that aside, I also just can't put up with someone coming that late to the party and then pretending that you were on the front lines the whole time. So it's one thing to come in and say, hey, look, I got this thing wrong. I was wrong about this. I see that I'm wrong now. And, hey, I'm ready to join this fight. If somebody says that, I welcome them with open arms. I would never. Anyone who says that about anything I say, great. We don't need to dwell on anything you said in the past. We're not gonna dig up tweets. We're not gonna do any of that. You've changed your mind. You've seen the error in your ways. Here you are, brothers in arms. Fantastic. I'll be the first to say that. I'm very consistent about that. But when you come in, especially as a politician, and there is no accountability, there is no admitting that you were wrong, and you just barge to the front of the line and say I'm the leader. I was doing this the whole time. That come on. That it's purely self serving and dishonest and it's particularly from a politician. I'm just not gonna put up with that. Why should we? And that's my problem there. Let's be real. Mainstream media isn't just broken, it's corrupt. They don't report the news, they curate it to fit their agenda. And Americans, well, we're done with it. That's why the Daily Wire exists. We're not here to follow the narrative, we're here to crush it. Our reporters go where the truth is, no matter how inconvenient it may be for the powerful. And we're not stopping there. We are creating the entertainment Hollywood won't. Bold movies, fearless documentaries and shows that fight back against the cultural rot. But here's the thing. None of this can happen without you. The fight for truth and culture starts with your support. Join the movement [e-mail] subscribe. Don't sit on the sidelines. Be a part of the revolution. Now, let's get to our daily cancellation. Now, if you spend very much time on social media, you have probably seen the story of the 500 pound aspiring female rapper who is suing Lyft after a driver refused to let her in the car because she was too fat. And if you're a fan of this show, you. You probably assumed that it would be the subject of a daily cancellation. And look, if you made that assumption, frankly, I have to say I'm offended that you think I'm so predictable. You just assume that I would do the easy and cheap thing and waste your time and mind doing a whole monologue about a fat woman who didn't fit in a car. In fact, you probably assume that I'll not only talk about this case, but I'll even play a clip of one of her music videos even though it has nothing to do with the story and adds nothing of value to the conversation. Well, if you assumed all of that, you are of course, totally correct. I mean, that is the point of the daily cancellation. What is the point of it if I'm not going to use it as an occasion to talk about a woman who ate so much Little Caesar stuffed crust pizza that she no longer fits inside a mid sized sedan? So let's start at the beginning. Dejao Blanding is the woman's real name. Dank DeMoss is her rap name. Or it might be the other way around. There's no Way to know. In any case, a few days ago, Ms. Dank went viral when she posted this video of her interaction with a Lyft driver who regretted to inform her that his car will not fit a woman who is the approximate size of a female polar bear. And I don't say that as an insult, by the way. This woman reportedly weighs about 500 pounds, which is, in fact, the upper range for a female polar bear. And I think that fact is important. I'm just trying to put it in perspective because it puts the tremendous size of this woman into perspective. And this story, a story that she made public, is all about her size. I mean, that's what this all hinges on. So here's what she looks like for reference. There's the picture. As you can see, she is, shall we say, a substantial woman. And here is the initial video of her encounter with the unfortunate Lyft driver, who it is that's most patient.

[Dejao Blanding]

My.

[Lyft Driver]

My car is small.

[Dejao Blanding]

I can fit in this car.

[Matt Walsh]

No.

[Lyft Driver]

Believe me, you can.

[Dejao Blanding]

Yes, I can believe it.

[Lyft Driver]

So, I'm sorry, what.

[Dejao Blanding]

What am I going about my money?

[Lyft Driver]

I'm done in cancer. You're not going to be.

[Dejao Blanding]

So you telling me I can't get in the lift because I can't fit in your car?

[Matt Walsh]

Yeah.

[Lyft Driver]

You need to order a bigger car.

[Dejao Blanding]

What make you think I can't fit in the car?

[Lyft Driver]

Yeah, I'm sorry.

[Dejao Blanding]

What makes you think I can't fit in this car?

[Lyft Driver]

Because the car is smaller than the factory.

[Dejao Blanding]

My best friend has a biz that's newer than this that I can fit in. That's the same size?

[Jim Acosta]

Yeah.

[Lyft Driver]

I'm short.

[Dejao Blanding]

So you really telling me I'm too busy getting your car, so I gotta order another lift?

[Lyft Driver]

And to be more. More stiff. Specific with you, I got very tired. Tired?

[Dejao Blanding]

What I got to do with your tires?

[Lyft Driver]

Yeah. And you have no space.

[Dejao Blanding]

How do you know I don't have no space?

[Lyft Driver]

Yeah, I got no space in the back.

[Matt Walsh]

So she asks what makes him think that she can't fit in his car. And the driver, because he's polite, did not respond. Well, ma'am, there are two things that make me think you can't fit in my car. My eyes. And it's good that he didn't say that. That would have been unkind. And so now, after that video made the rounds, Ms. Dank put out a statement addressing all the haters. And I found her to be remarkably eloquent, to be honest with you. So check it out.

[Dejao Blanding]

Let's talk about it. Since Everybody and they bald headed ass mama got something to say about Dank. First of all, let's touch bases on the big in the back. That got something to say about me. I seen a say go, you cool like you only like one burger away from being my size. Like y'all got me up. Stop calling yourself a BBW. Cause you not. Other BBWs don't put other BBWs down. Second of all, I never contacted Lyft. Then y'all talking about, oh, she posted a video for Cloud. I am the clout. I've been doing this a long time. I posted this video because y'all got us up. Y'all always trying to put big people in a category. Oh, big people this or big da da da da or big this. Stop doing that. Y'all want us to be in a house, miserable, bored. Oh, cover up or da da da da da da. You can't wear that. You big and da da da you, you below zero. I'm outside and you pulling off on me. I don't give a. You gave me my money back. I don't give a about none of that. Like y'all got us up. I'm not in the house. I'm outside. I'm showing my stomach. Y'all talking about, stop playing with me on this Internet.

[Matt Walsh]

You know, I have to say, when I first heard about this woman's plight, I was not, I confess, especially sympathetic. But then I watched that video and I started to understand her perspective. And she's right. Because I too am sick and tired of the bitch ass Internet. You can't deny, you can't deny it is a bitch ass Internet. So she has a point. And secondly, she says that we all need to stop putting large women like herself into categories. And again, I agree. I would never try to put her in a category. She does not fit in any category. Or any Toyota Corolla, as it turns out. Which only proves her point, is what I'm saying. So I think now is as good a time as any to take a quick detour and check out one of Ms. Stank's music videos. Will it help us understand her situation? Will it clarify any aspect of this controversy for us? No and no. But we don't need an excuse, I think, to enjoy some quality music, do we? So here you go.

[Dejao Blanding]

I'm that bitch hit ain't no capping me Ain't talking bout why homosey mumbling pay fat queen these bitches under me worry bout who which one don't bother me I done lost my mind I think I left it at home I ain't fighting to the top I put my name on the throne I been chosen again if she wants more, she offend if I lose $20, I'm just gonna again I'll be mentoring these When I rap it makes sense I made it on my own Y'all had to suck three I ain't jumping for this Then I stand on it I can outsmart a killer Ain't no scaring me.

[Matt Walsh]

So there you go. You know, she. I'm sure you were tracking the lyrics there. She said that at one point, she says, these under me and that that I are the bitches. Okay, we need to check. We need to check on the bitches that were under you. I'm concerned for their health and safety at this point. I have to say, the collective IQ in that room was quite impressive. I think with their brain power all combined, I have no doubt that it would create an intellect powerful enough to graduate middle school. And I. I mean that as a compliment. Just to be clear. All the. Everything I'm saying is meant as a compliment. So now we get to the inevitable part of this story where the requisite lawsuit is filed. Here's the local Fox affiliate with the earth shattering news.

[Local Fox Reporter]

Jib Landing tells us she was just trying to get to a Detroit Lions watch party this month when her lift rolled up.

[Dejao Blanding]

As I'm walking, I see him, like, making faces or whatever.

[Local Fox Reporter]

I'm like, oh, man, she already knew.

[Dejao Blanding]

I can fit in this car.

[Lyft Driver]

Believe me. You can?

[Dejao Blanding]

Yes, I can.

[Matt Walsh]

Believe me.

[Local Fox Reporter]

He told her there's not enough room in his car.

[Dejao Blanding]

The kicker part was when he started to talk about his tires. You know, I feel like that was a slap in the face. That was like, my tires, you know.

[Local Fox Reporter]

Like, the driver said his tires could not handle her weight.

[Dejao Blanding]

Every big person you turn down because they can't fit in your car.

[Lyft Driver]

Yeah, because they need to order.

[Dejao Blanding]

No, I don't. Never have to order Uber xl.

[Local Fox Reporter]

He apologized, canceled the ride, and left her there. The rapper says she's pretty tough. Dank Demoss, as she's known at the mic, is crushed by the whole situation.

[Dejao Blanding]

I just want them to know, like, it really hurt my feelings.

[Local Fox Reporter]

It looks like Lyft might be hurting pretty soon, too.

[Matt Walsh]

I knew it was illegal, and I knew that it was wrong.

[Local Fox Reporter]

Her attorneys, John Marco and Zach Runyon, say ruined weight is a protected characteristic in Michigan.

[Matt Walsh]

By law, it would be no different than a driver pulling up and saying, you know, I don't want to have black people in my car or I don't want to have Christians in my.

[Lyft Driver]

Car or Muslims in my car.

[Matt Walsh]

It's the same under the law. It's the same.

[Local Fox Reporter]

The lawsuit is filed. Since she posted the encounter on social media, other full figured folks have reached out saying the same thing happened to them.

[Matt Walsh]

Yes, you heard that right. Full figured folks. That is now the euphemism for 500 pound human beings. One might object that if you weigh more than the ATV parked in my garage right now, that your figure is several steps beyond full. It reached its capacity about 300 pounds ago. Because the human body, just like a vehicle, does have a capacity. Your bone structure and internal organs are not designed to carry around and sustain that kind of weight. They can't. Which is why literally every single person the size of miss Dank will die and die soon. She will either go on a diet and lose weight or she will be dead within like 10 years, probably much sooner. Especially now that she has scummy lawyers encouraging her to see her weight as a quote unquote protected characteristic. Her lawyer says that rejecting a person because they're extremely morbidly obese is no different than rejecting them because they're black. But it is, of course, very different. Ms. Dank was born black. She was not born 500 pounds. In fact, using a rough calculation, we know that in order to maintain 500 pounds of weight, you would need to consume something like 8,000 calories a day. Though she almost certainly eats much more than that because she's doing more than simply maintaining. But even 8,000 calories a day is a mind boggling amount. I mean, that's at least four times the recommended calorie intake for an adult woman. She's eating enough for at least four people every day. I mean, that's just the fact. In order to do that, you have to essentially eat all day. I mean, think about how much eating you would have to do to take in those kinds of calories every single day. This is basically non stop eating. You have to adopt the lifestyle of a panda, eating for 10 to 16 hours a day. Of course, pandas eat that much because they're morons and they only eat bamboo, which has no nutritional value. Ms. Dank is probably not surviving on bamboo. We can assume she's almost certainly eating nothing but processed foods all day, every day. So it takes sustained, almost herculean effort to be and remain that obese. To say that someone's status as morbidly obese is protected. It's like saying that a man who chooses to walk around upside down on his hands all day is protected. It makes no sense. Incredible effort is required to be in that position. But this is obvious, of course. I mean, obviously it would be absurd if she wins a single dime in a lawsuit, which means that just as obviously a court in Michigan will probably award her $50 million, which is the same thing as giving her a death sentence, because she's gonna spend the money on food and she's gonna complete the slow motion suicide that she's been committing for years now. It's also obvious that the Lyft driver is the real victim here. It's pretty clear that he was embarrassed, as any normal person would be, having to tell her that she's too stupendously fat to fit into his vehicle. He would have preferred to just give her a ride, take her money and be done with it. But she literally could not fit in the car. He couldn't figure out how to make the geometry work. And he was worried, rightly so, about the effect on his tires and the structural integrity of his car having that much weight bunched up on one side of it. Even if he could wedge her in there like an over packed suitcase, he was not at all sure that the sort of damage that would be done to his vehicle, which is the source of his livelihood. So she owes him an apology for putting him in that position, not the other way around. And all of that is self evident, I think, to any thinking person. We don't need to dwell on any of that any more than we already have. To me, the bigger issue, no pun intended, is just the total lack of shame on the part of this woman. The fact that you've eaten so much that anyone even has to question whether you will fit in a car, a car that was built to transport four entire people. The fact that they have to question whether you'll fit in it should embarrass you. It should be the mother of all wake up calls. This is the equivalent of an alcoholic waking up naked in a back alley dumpster in a city he doesn't recognize. Like it's a moment when life is screaming at you through a bullhorn and carrying a giant neon blinking sign that says you have a problem. And if you aren't picking up on that hint, then your situation is hopeless. And in Ms. Denk's case, she not only is ignoring the hint, but interpreting it in exactly the opposite way. The sign says you have a problem. She reads it as everyone else is the problem. That's what a chronic lack of shame and a pathological self centeredness gets you. It gets you to this moment of extreme humiliation. Even if you're too narcissistic to feel, still got you there. Just like it got you to £500. And that is why our friend Ms. Stank, who doesn't fit into any categories or into most anything else, is today canceled. That'll do it for the show today. Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening. Talk to you tomorrow. Have a great day. Godspeed.