Ep. 1557 - Trans Activists Hijack A School Board Meeting To Verbally Attack A Concerned Mother

Summary

Summary of "The Matt Walsh Show" Episode 1557

Episode Title: Trans Activists Hijack A School Board Meeting To Verbally Attack A Concerned Mother
Release Date: March 18, 2025
Host: Matt Walsh
Podcast: The Matt Walsh Show by The Daily Wire

---

1. Introduction

In Episode 1557 of The Matt Walsh Show, host Matt Walsh delves into recent controversies surrounding transgender activism, focusing primarily on an incident at a school board meeting in Deerfield, Illinois. The episode also touches on broader cultural and political issues, including France's demand for the return of the Statue of Liberty and efforts to decolonize Shakespearean literature.

---

2. Trans Activists and the Deerfield School Board Meeting

a. Overview of the Incident

Matt Walsh begins by narrating a distressing event where a concerned mother, Nicole Georges, alleges that her 13-year-old daughter was forced to change in front of a male student in a school locker room. This incident is portrayed as a violation of Trump's executive order aimed at restricting biological males from accessing female locker rooms and participating in female sports.

b. Nicole Georges' Testimony

Nicole Georges recounts the troubling experience at the Deerfield middle school:

• Timestamp [03:26]: Georges explains how her daughter was compelled to share a locker room with a male student who identifies as female.

• Timestamp [05:30]: She details the school's response, including multiple administrators forcing her daughter and other girls to change in the presence of the male student, leading to feelings of violation and distress.

c. Trans Activists' Responses

During the school board meeting, trans activists vocally opposed Georges' concerns:

• Timestamp [09:41]: An activist questions why Georges is "obsessed with the genitals of children," reflecting a dismissive attitude toward the mother's legitimate concerns.

• Timestamp [12:07]: Another activist links the issue to broader anti-white and anti-religious agendas, further delegitimizing Georges' complaint.

d. Matt Walsh's Analysis

Matt Walsh vehemently criticizes the actions of the trans activists and the school officials:

• Timestamp [06:28]: He suggests that the school officials' actions amount to sexual assault, kidnapping, and child endangerment.

• Timestamp [12:42]: Walsh denounces the activists as "disgusting, evil people" and "demonic Satanists," emphasizing their relentless push despite public backlash.

• Timestamp [15:25]: He highlights the inequity in the school's response, questioning why only the girls are required to request privacy accommodations while the male student's discomfort is disregarded.

Walsh argues that these actions constitute child abuse and calls for legal repercussions against the involved school officials and activists. He asserts that such extremist behavior transcends political debate, labeling it as a direct threat to children's rights and safety.

---

3. Additional Topics Covered

a. Delta Airlines Incident and Female Pilots

Matt Walsh discusses a recent Delta Airlines incident where a plane's wing struck the runway during landing:

• Timestamp [24:03]: Audio snippets reveal the pilot's communication with air traffic controllers.

Walsh posits a controversial theory linking increased incidents to the rise in female pilots, attributing it to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. He questions the competence of female pilots, despite their small representation in the industry, suggesting a need to reevaluate hiring practices.

b. France's Demand for the Statue of Liberty

The episode addresses France's request for the return of the Statue of Liberty:

• Timestamp [28:57]: Walsh humorously responds to the notion by proposing to send only the statue's poem back to France, criticizing the symbolic significance attributed to it.

Walsh downplays the poem's importance, arguing that it does not represent core American values and ridicules the French politician's stance as unfounded.

c. Decolonizing Shakespeare

Walsh critiques efforts to "decolonize" Shakespearean literature:

• Timestamp [53:14]: A lecture by Professor Ayanna Thompson is cited, advocating for juxtaposing Shakespeare with non-white playwrights to encourage diverse perspectives.

Walsh mocks this approach, labeling it as an attempt to undermine Shakespeare's legacy and promote anti-white racial narratives. He dismisses the academic terminology as a façade for racial bias, asserting that such efforts dilute cultural heritage.

---

4. Notable Quotes

Throughout the episode, Matt Walsh intersperses the discussion with pointed remarks. Here are some of the most impactful quotes:

• [06:28]
  "If this claim is true... those school officials... are guilty of sexual assault. You could probably add kidnapping and child endangerment charges as well."

• [09:47]
  "These are just disgusting, evil people, demonic Satanists. Just the worst kinds of people."

• [15:27]
  "So why can't the boy request the other accommodation in this scenario? Why do all the girls have to request their own accommodation but the male doesn't?"

• [29:15]
  "Here's an idea. We give the Statue of Liberty back to France, but the deal is that we also give France back to Germany."

• [53:14]
  "Jay Z in Shakespeare is indeed quite the juxtaposition."

---

5. Conclusion

In this episode, Matt Walsh fervently critiques the actions of trans activists in educational settings, portraying them as extreme and unyielding in their pursuit of ideological goals at the expense of children's rights and safety. Additionally, he extends his critical perspective to other cultural and political issues, emphasizing a resistance against what he perceives as overreaching progressive policies and cultural shifts.

Walsh’s commentary reflects his broader stance against transgender activism, DEI initiatives, and cultural decolonization efforts, advocating for a return to traditional values and skepticism towards contemporary progressive movements.

---

Note: This summary aims to encapsulate the key discussions and viewpoints presented in the episode. For a comprehensive understanding, listening to the full episode is recommended.

Transcript

[Matt Walsh]

Today on the Matt Walsh show, girls at a school in Illinois were allegedly forced to get changed in front of a boy, all in the name of trans inclusion and in defiance of Trump's executive order. Also, France has requested that we return the Statue of Liberty. I can think of one small part of the statue, but I wouldn't mind sending them. I'll explain. And the process of decolonizing Shakespeare has officially started. We'll talk about all that and more today on the Matt Wal Being a husband, father and host of my own show means life never slows down. Imagine trying to eat 31 different fruits and vegetables every day. It sounds miserable and time consuming, and sometimes I just want something deep fried and unhealthy, to be perfectly frank. But with Balance of Nature, fruits and veggies, there's never been a more convenient dietary supplement to ensure you get a wide variety of fruits and vegetables every day with 31 different whole fruits and vegetable ingredients. Balance of Nature takes fruits and vegetables, they freeze, dry them, turn them into a powder, and then put them into a capsule. You take your fruit and veggie capsules every day, and then your body knows what to do with them. Go to balanceofnature.com, use promo code Walsh for 35% off your first order as a preferred customer. Plus get a free bottle of fiber and spice. That's balanceofnature.com, promo code Walsh. When an obnoxious group of political activists suddenly go silent, it's usually a sign that they're regrouping in some way. That's especially true after the activists suffer a crushing defeat in a national election. It's only natural to assume that under those circumstances, the activists have gone underground for a bit in order to refine their messaging. They're putting their best minds together to come up with a platform that might appeal to more people. Or at the very least, they're taking steps to make sure that when they emerge from hiding, they're not seen as even crazier and less convincing than they were before. That's the bare minimum you would expect. Think about how the Indians realized that they were on the losing side of the whole debate over who gets the land, so they came back and decided to settle for owning a bunch of casinos instead. So it's kind of a strategic retreat. It's an effective way to come back and get back in the game. This is the playbook that we've seen again and again. But after this week, it's clear that trans activists and the LGBT movement have thrown out this manual. Following their rejection at the ballot box in November, trans activists have decided against the idea of moderating their insanity. Instead, they've elected to double down on the most extreme and demented aspects of their ideology. They've devolved to a degree that if you weren't paying attention, you might have thought was impossible. We are now at the point where trans activists are embracing cruelty that isn't even cloaked with the usual lies about scientific consensus or anything like that. These people are now endorsing child abuse without reservation, right out in the open, without even euphemisms anymore. Now, that's always what they've stood for, but now they're not even attempting to hide it. And in order to understand the depths of depravity that I'm talking about, you need to watch the scene that unfolded at a school board meeting on Thursday in a suburb of Chicago called Deerfield. A woman named Nicole Georges began by telling the school board that her daughter is a 13 year old student at a local middle school and recently, her 13 year old daughter was forced to share a bathroom with a male student. Watch.

[Nicole Georges]

This Nightmare began on February 5th when my daughter was using the girl's bathroom and was stunned that a biological male student was using it as well. She came home frightened and was extremely upset. I asked her to talk with her teachers and find out more information. She was told by the administration that a student can use the bathroom as well as a female locker room because they now identify as female. I expressed that the school was in clear violation of federal policy. The Trump administration issued an executive order restricting biological males from participating in sports and accessing female locker rooms. That day, I filed a civil rights complaint on behalf of my daughter with the Department of Justice.

[Matt Walsh]

Now, just to clarify, if you're watching the video and you see all the people in Covid masks and you hear the trans extremism that we're going to play in a few minutes, it would be understandable if you assume that this video was from like 2021. But it's not. It's from last week. And yet this is what it looks like. And before we play the rest of Nicole George's statement, it's worth pointing out that, strangely enough, no one on the left is calling the situation a constitutional crisis, even though she's pointing out correctly that the state of Illinois is defying Trump's executive order on gender ideology in the process. They're disregarding the civil rights of children at a systematic level. And if you listen to the left's complaints about how outrageous it was that the Trump administration ignored a judge's order when he deported Venezuelan terrorists the other day. You might think that they'd be equally upset about what the state of Illinois is doing in this case. But of course there's no outrage because these people are more than happy to ignore orders when they feel like it. If it's orders that they don't like, and the state of Illinois should lose federal funding immediately as a result, that's just the beginning. We'll talk about what other penalties should be imposed in a second, and if you don't agree with that, then you'll change your mind. After you hear the rest of Nicole Georges statement. Listen. As she explains what the adults at this middle school allegedly forced her child to do against her will. Listen.

[Nicole Georges]

The situation went from bad to worse. A few days later, the male student was present in the girls locker room. Feeling violated, the girls made the choice to not change into their PE clothes with a biological male student present. The next day, Assistant Principal Kathy vantrease pulled the girls into their office questioning them. The same day, Assistant Superintendent Joanna Ford, Kathy Van Treese and multiple teachers all came into the girls locker room making them change into uniform. This went on all week with the addition of Ginger Laugerman. My daughter refused to take part in having her privacy being violated. How dare they. She ran out and called me for help. Principal Wegley answered, was answered, we're offering my daughter a new answers was offering my daughter a new PE class. The answer was no. She is not changing for the remainder of the year and she is not changing into another class. The girls just want their privacy and they want their locker room back.

[Matt Walsh]

So just to restate what we heard, this woman is saying that school officials forced her 13 year old daughter and several other other girls as well to change in front of a male student in a locker room at a middle school. And so this was not just as bad as it is. This was not just allowing the boy into the locker room that's bad enough. This was the school officials in the locker room forcing them to disrobe and get changed in front of this boy. And those school officials she said include the district assistant superintendent for student Services, the schools assistant principal and the director for student services. Now if this claim is true, and as you'll see in a moment, there's no reason to doubt that it is, then the school officials who force these girls to change in front of a boy are guilty of sexual assault. You could probably add kidnapping and child endangerment charges as well, you know, the fact that this took place in a school should not provide any kind of COVID for these people. If anything, it makes the charges even more serious. And whatever charges are brought, it would still be too light of a punishment. I mean, try to imagine what you would do as a parent if you learned that an adult was forcing your daughter to get changed in front of a male against her will. I mean, criminal charges would probably be the least of that particular adult's problems. I would hope. At a minimum, we need conservative DAs to start pressing those kinds of charges against the people pushing this kind of madness. This goes beyond the realm of a political debate or a constitutional crisis. This is child abuse. And if there were any good faith members of the trans activist community, if any of them were capable of some level of basic human decency, they would admit that. They would at least say that, hey, listen, yeah, of course you should not force 13 year old girls. You should not have adults standing there forcing 13 year old girls to take their clothes off. Obviously that is well beyond anything that could be remotely considered acceptable in a school or in any other context. You would have some trans activists saying that, but none of them are, none of them are, because they are totally incapable of human decency. If they were, they would acknowledge that indeed it is possible to go too far in the process of affirming gender ideology. And that point is reached when you're forcing children to expose themselves to members of the opposite sex. But because there are no good faith trans activists, or any decent ones either, you could probably guess how this mother's statement was received. As soon as she was finished, boos rang out in the room. And one person asked her why she was obsessed with the genitals of children, which is one of those stock arguments these activists use all the time, even though it makes no sense whatsoever. I mean, they could be exposing themselves to you and your children in the park, and then when you object to it, they'll say, why are you so obsessed? Why are you so obsessed with me not doing this? Then a few other activists spoke at the school board meeting and they continued to take cheap shots at this mother. Watch. Thank you. Why are you. Children's genitals.

[Nicole Georges]

Yeah, for real.

[Matt Walsh]

Nobody was born you or you were talking, weren't you? Yeah, Exactly.

[Charlie]

Executive Order 2019-11, which my kid was standing next to Pritzker when he signed. Yes, an executive order from the governor. And in that order, it's called Strengthening our commitment to Affirming Inclusive Schools, which protects trans non binary and gender non Conforming students from the type of bullying that this parent represents.

[Kathy Van Treese]

And let's consider who is pushing this complaint. I'm here because I was alerted that Moms for Liberty was organizing a presence here today who have been identified as an extremist hate group by the Southern Poverty Law center for Spreading Bigotry and Division. This. This isn't just about a locker room policy. It's part of a national effort to roll back LGBTQ plus rights.

[Matt Walsh]

Just disgusting people. I mean, the adults in this room that are. That are taking. That are attacking this mother because she doesn't want her daughter to be abused. These are just disgusting, evil people, demonic Satanists. Just the worst kinds of people. Nothing redeeming about them whatsoever. And as you see, this is the dominant mode of thought, such as it is, among trans activists at the moment. If you're a mother who doesn't want your daughter to be forced to strip in front of males in middle school, then you're a bully. Not wanting your daughter to have to take her clothes off in front of a boy makes you a bully. You're bullying the boy by depriving him of the experience of having girls get changed around him. I mean, how can your mind even form those kinds of thoughts? Well, it's because your mind is forcing those kinds of. Forming those kinds of thoughts because you're just a radical, incapable of. Of any kind of rational thought, which means that if you want to protect your child, in their minds, you're an extremist. You're obsessed with genitalia somehow, and on and on. One particularly threatening trans activist took things a step further and railed against white supremacy and the white God. And this person did so while wearing a shirt that reads, protect trans kids with a picture of a knife. Watch.

[Charlie]

Thank you to the board for prioritizing the safety of the student that's been targeted by a organization that weaponizes religion to push the white supremacist agenda of their CIS white husbands. Thank you.

[Matt Walsh]

Excuse me. Excuse me. This is. It's.

[Charlie]

I have.

[Matt Walsh]

Let's be respectful. Please be respectful of each other's times.

[Charlie]

Targeting a middle school student because of your white God.

[Nicole Georges]

My white God?

[Charlie]

Yeah.

[Matt Walsh]

Excuse me. Can we pause for a second?

[Charlie]

I'm just. I'm really grateful to see how full this room is of support for this kid instead of the petty women that target him.

[Matt Walsh]

Now, the framing, of course, is that the male student is being targeted so they can force a girl to undress in a place she doesn't want to undress in front of a of a male student. Otherwise the male's being targeted. The girl isn't being targeted in that scenario, apparently. Instead it's the male. He's not getting to see the girls undressed, so he's the victim. I mean, it doesn't exactly take Freud to understand the psychology underlying this entire movement. And to the extent that any of those activists presented something approaching an argument, it was to suggest that actually these girls did have the option of requesting private changing rooms. That came up a few times during the school board meeting. But I'm going to focus on this one clip featuring a trans identifying individual who uses the name Charlie and Charlie uses they he pronouns. So we're going to go ahead and use she to describe her because it seems like it's probably the most accurate option here. Charlie says that she also has a trans middle schooler, which of course is maybe the least surprising revelation imaginable. If trans activists are good at anything, it's indoctrinating their own children. In any event, here's Charlie's big moment where she reads from an Illinois state law that's supposedly about human rights.

[Charlie]

Also, under the Illinois Human Rights Act, Section 3B1, the use of restrooms, locker rooms and changing rooms may not be restricted based on a student's physical anatomy or chromosomal sex. A student must be permitted to access restrooms or bathrooms, locker rooms and changing rooms that align with their gender related identity and without having to provide documentation or other proof of gender. Under this act, and as stated, the discomfort or privacy concerns of other students, teachers or parents are not valid reasons to deny or limit the full and equal use of those facilities based on a student's gender related identity. Instead, any student, teacher, or other individual seeking more privacy should be accommodated by providing that individual with a more private option upon their request. Sounds like that would be a great option in this case for your kids.

[Matt Walsh]

Excuse me.

[Charlie]

So the whole audience is that direction.

[Matt Walsh]

Excuse me. This is his time to talk.

[Kathy Van Treese]

Right?

[Charlie]

Thank you.

[Matt Walsh]

So this is the extent of the concessions that these people were willing to offer. They're saying that anyone who wants more privacy under the law can use a separate bathroom. Now they can request some other accommodation. Now put aside the fact that in this case the other accommodation apparently was not provided. What they don't address is the obvious question, which is why can't the boy request the other accommodation in this scenario? Why do all the girls have to request their own accommodation but the male doesn't? If you've got one person who's got a problem with the Bathroom arrangement. Doesn't it make the most sense to if you're going to give him the separate accommodation? No, I don't think he should get any separate accommodation at all. If a boy wants to use the girl's bathroom, the girls locker room, you just say to the boy, too bad. Here's your locker room, Deal with it. But if you're going to go this other accommodation route, why would it be for the girls? Why do they have to make a special request? Well, the reason is apparently that it would make the boy feel bad if he is not included in the girls locker room. But the fact that his presence makes girls feel bad, feel unsafe and vulnerable simply doesn't register. As you heard from that trans activist, the girl's feelings of discomfort are simply invalid. The trans activists never explain why this discomfort is invalid. Neither does the Illinois law. They also don't explain why. Well, if feelings of discomfort are invalid, then why can't we say the same thing about the boy? Why can't we say the same thing about the trans person? You know, it's actually there. If you're a trans identified person and you feel uncomfortable in the bathroom, that aligns with your actual biological sex, those feelings are irrelevant to anyone else. That is your own problem. That's your own little hang up. That's your own issue. Okay? Deal with that on your own time. That's not anyone else's problem. And we all know the explanation, which is that these activists, above all else, are sadists who crave power. They relish the prospect of forcing women and girls to take part in this charade. From their perspective, the more degrading the process is, the better. Everyone must be forced to participate. Whatever mental harm 10 or 20 middle school girls might suffer as a result, they just don't care. Their only goal is to ensure that the male in the scenario gets his satisfaction. Now, I watched the rest of this hearing and the arguments from these trans activists only got worse from here somehow. Here's just a couple of them.

[Charlie]

I wanted to say also that a lot of part of the education is to know that a lot of transgender people pass.

[Nicole Georges]

You wouldn't know that they're transgender.

[Charlie]

And so what do you want to do?

[Nicole Georges]

Like have genital checks of people, talk.

[Charlie]

About privacy and invasion of privacy. That is a logistical hurdle that you.

[Nicole Georges]

Would not want to even try to accomplish.

[Matt Walsh]

I don't think there are safe people.

[Nicole Georges]

And please, please, we need to expand this just from the locker room and teach respect. Using appropriate pronouns is the first thing you do.

[Matt Walsh]

Do not Call this child a he. She is a she from her soul.

[Nicole Georges]

Her brain and heart.

[Matt Walsh]

Match that, please. He's a he. What are you going to do about it? Now, I'm just thinking out loud here, but when I watch these kinds of videos, I think maybe I need to show up there. How would you guys feel about that, you trans activists up there? What if I show up with 5,000 of my closest friends? How about that? What then? Who are you going to shout down then? So the second woman just yells about pronouns. Nothing new there. And the first woman makes a familiar logistical argument saying some trans identifying children supposedly pass, and therefore, unless we want to inspect their bodies, we need to just accept whatever these kids say. Now, first of all, of course it's not true that any trans identifying middle schoolers actually pass for a member of the opposite gender. The child in this situation certainly didn't come close to quote unquote, passing. And passing is like a myth that. It's a myth that trans activists have made up to make themselves feel better. It's like it doesn't. It's not real. Okay, none of you guys are passing. We all know. Okay, we all know. We all know. We all know. And for that matter, none of the activists at this school board meeting come close to passing either. Humans have evolved for a very long time to develop certain sex specific traits and to perceive those traits in others. A child who throws on a wig from Party City is not going to overcome that. But even if we assume for the sake of argument, that some child somehow manages to fool everyone at school into thinking that he's really a girl, it's completely insane to endorse the idea that he should then have access to girls locker rooms. You set the rule. No boys in a girls locker room. If a boy manages to sneak in, that's really bad. But just because he manages to fool people and sneak into these locker rooms doesn't make his actions justified. It doesn't mean that we change the rule. It's like saying that a bank robber is justified if no one ever notices that he pulled off the heist. Deception is wrong, whether it's detected or not. This is a basic moral principle, one of many basic moral principles that trans activists have abandoned. If the school board meeting demonstrates anything, it's that these people are never going to become more moderate or more sensible, no matter how badly they lose national elections. As I pointed out before, most of the adult trans activists who continue in the fight, a lot of the people we see in that room are either trans themselves or they have trans kids, or in some cases both, as we saw at the school board meeting. So they'll never let it go. Because to let it go would be to admit that they've maimed and mutilated themselves or their children. That's a level of self reflection and acceptance that trans activists as the ultimate narcissists are simply incapable of achieving. And what that means is that it's now the responsibility of law enforcement officials at both the state and federal levels to prevent trans activists from continuing to abuse children in this way. There are clearly no limits to their depravity at this point. If we want to end this sickness, executive orders and court cases are not going to be enough on their own. The school officials who embrace this need to go to prison. The school districts that enforce these policies need to lose all federal funding. Simply put, there is no legal penalty too excessive for child abuse. And if we want to protect children and prevent anything like this from happening again, it's time that the people responsible start facing those penalties. Now let's get to our five headlines. Imagine printing your entire browsing history, signing it and nailing it to your front door for all of your neighbors to see, or putting it on a billboard over a major highway. Sounds crazy, yet that's basically what most of us do every day. Unless we're using ExpressVPN. Your Internet provider can see every website you visit? Yes, even in incognito mode. In many countries, they're required to keep logs of your activity for years in case the government wants to look. In the US, ISPs can actually sell your data to whoever they want. You can't stop ISPs from collecting this data, but you can encrypt your online activity before it reaches them, turning their logs into meaningless gibberish. With ExpressVPN, my Internet provider simply cannot see, record, share, or sell my browsing history because they never had access to it in the first place. I personally use it every time I travel for work events, rallies, and all the like. It gives me peace of mind knowing that my sensitive emails and financial information are safe, even on sketchy hotel or airport wifi. Plus, I love how simple ExpressVPN is to use just one tap on my devices, and my privacy is protected whether I'm on my phone, laptop or desktop. I know my online activity is secure. So if you'd like to join me in fighting for the right to privacy, use my special [e-mail] walls that's expressvp expressvpn.com Walsh New York Post reports the wing of a Delta Airlines plane hit the Runway at LaGuardia Airport during an unsteady landing on Sunday night. The packed flight was heading home from Jacksonville when the pilot attempted to go around following an unstable approach around 10:10pm during the go around, the left wing of the plane struck the Runway. Everybody was safe. But of course, a very close call. We do have some audio of the pilot communications with air traffic controllers and pay close attention to this and tell me what you noticed. Listen, somebody saw some sparks from one of your wings.

[Nicole Georges]

You guys feel anything? We don't, but we'll check it.

[Kathy Van Treese]

The Delta regional flight arrived from Jacksonville.

[Matt Walsh]

Florida just after 10 Sunday night. 80 passengers and crew on board.

[Kathy Van Treese]

Conditions were suboptimal but not extreme.

[Matt Walsh]

Winds gusting to 35 mph with some mist in the air.

[Kathy Van Treese]

The plane then circling for another landing attempt.

[Matt Walsh]

In a statement, Delta says the crew executed a go around, landed safely and proceeded to its arrival gate, adding, we.

[Kathy Van Treese]

Apologize to our customers for the experience.

[Matt Walsh]

So you heard the audio there and now look. I believe that as human beings, sometimes our need to find patterns can go a bit haywire. That's how you end up with the craziest conspiracy theories. The, you know, Sandy Hook was staged, that sort of thing. Sometimes we find patterns that just aren't there. But this is not one of those times. There does appear to be a very unmistakable pattern in nearly all of the recent airline disasters and near disasters. The pattern, if I have to spell it out, is that women pilots were involved in, like, all of them. And keep in mind that female pilots are still only about 5% of commercial airline pilots. And you know, before you think that the small number disproves the claim that they're using DEI to hire more women, you should know that the number of female pilots has increased by 70% since the early 2000s. And that did not happen naturally. Okay? That kind of growth in one demographic does not happen on its own without major policy changes to manufacture that kind of growth. So there's been a concerted effort to get more female pilots in the cockpit. And now, even though they still only comprise 5% of the total, they seem to be involved in, like every hazardous situation that we hear about. What are the official numbers? How many accidents and near accidents are the fault of that 5% or are the 5% involved in? Well, we don't know exactly and we'll never know because nobody in a position of authority will ever give us those numbers. All we could do is gather Information from news reports and that sort of thing. And just based on that, yeah, there appears to be a real pattern here. Let's just be honest about it. So at what point will we all acknowledge that female pilots are, in fact, a real problem? I mean, we have a real female pilot problem. We do. How many more of these kinds of issues do we need before everyone will say, yeah, there's an issue here. We have lowered the standards, apparently, to get more and more women involved. And now look at all that's happening. I mean, air travel is more dangerous now than it's been in a very long time at the other end of all this DEI stuff. And look, with this latest thing, you know, there was a female pilot on the radio from the sound of it. That doesn't mean that she was the one landing the plane. Maybe it was a dude actually steering the plane. It's possible that this incident doesn't actually fit into this pattern. We don't have all the information because they never tell us. That's the other thing. We don't. They never give us all the information. So we can only just scrape together what they do tell us. All we know is that there have been a number of airplane issues recently, and female pilots seem to be in the mix for all of them, again, even though they're a very small minority. And so this is not just a joke anymore. It's not just something we joke about with female pilots. No, there's a. There's a. Like I said, how many more of this do we need before everyone will say, yeah, we got to take a look at this. This is a real thing that's happening. You can call it sexist, you can call it whatever you want to call it, but. But there's clearly a problem here. The Express reports a member of the Fresh government requested the return of the Statue of Liberty, claiming America had lost its way and no longer represented what the statue was meant to symbolize. Raphael Glucksman has been highly critical of President Donald Trump and said, we're going to say to the Americans who have chosen to side with the tyrants, to the Americans who fired researchers for demanding scientific freedom, we gave it to you as a gift, but apparently you despise it, so it'll be just fine here at home. So he wants the Statue of Liberty back. Kathryn Levitt had a chance. The White House spokeswoman had a chance to respond to this, and here's what she said different. There is now a member of the European Parliament from France who does not think the US represents the values of the Statue of Liberty anymore. They want the Statue of Liberty back. So is President Trump going to send the Statue of Liberty back to France?

[Nicole Georges]

Absolutely not. And my advice to that unnamed low level French politician would be to remind them that it's only because of the United States of America that the French are not speaking German right now. So they should be very grateful to our great country.

[Matt Walsh]

Yeah, here's an idea. And I liked her response. I'll make this deal. We give the Statue of Liberty back to France, but the deal is that we also give France back to Germany. If we're returning things back to their rightful owners, then let's make that deal. And also France has to cover the shipping and handling for the Statue of Liberty. I have no idea. Shipping that ups. I don't know what the. The cost of that's going to be pretty substantial. Now, of course, when this dumb politician says that America no longer represents what the statue symbolizes, he's talking mainly about the poem on the statue. Like, what does the statue symbolize in his mind? Well, he's talking about the poem, right? And especially the part that says, given your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore, send these the homeless tempest tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door. Right. That's the poem. And the French politician actually quoted that poem when he was saying that we no longer stand by what the statue represents. And so clearly that's what he was referring to. And we hear this all the time. The Statue of Liberty poem is quoted all the time as though it represents some fundamental American value. But can we just say this about the poem? First of all, it wasn't even initially part of the Statue of Liberty. The statue was built in the 1870s and 1880s. The poem was added to the base of the statue in the early 1900s, like 1903, I think. And the poem is just a poem that somebody wrote. It's not a founding document. It's not the Constitution. It's not the Declaration of Independence. Some poet wrote it in the late 19th century, and it was then put on a plaque and added to the pedestal of the statue. The poem in no way represents any kind of core American value. It is the work of one woman named Emma Lazarus. And so the poem speaks to the core values of Emma Lazarus, not of the United States of America. Personally, if we could just be honest about it, I think the poem is pretty lame. I think it sucks. The poem sucks. Let's just be Real. It's a mediocre bad poem. It's not a great poem. So how about this? Let's take the poem off of the statue and send that to France. Now they didn't write the poem. It wasn't originally on the statue. But they want the statue back, so they didn't say what part of the statue. So let's take the poem off and ship them that. I mean shipping and handling on. That's going to be a lot cheaper, I'll tell you that. So they can have that. Put it on the Eiffel Tower if you want. How about that? I mean, on a pure artistic level, it's a C poem at best. On its merits, judging the content, judging the message, it's an F minus effort. I totally disagree with the sentiment of it's not un American. Well, how could you disagree? It's a poem on the Statue of Liberty. I don't care. Some woman wrote it and just put it on the Statue of Liberty. It doesn't mean I just American I have to agree with does not speak to any core value of this country at all. You know what? No, I don't want your tired, poor, homeless mat. I don't want your wretched. What's the phrase exactly? The wretched refuse. I don't want the wretched refuse of any country. Why the hell would we want that? No, I do not want that. No, please keep your wretched refuse. I do not want them. We don't want them. Why would we want them? No, please, no. America is not an international homeless shelter. It's not so. And nobody ever thought of America as an international homeless shelter until that dumb poem was added to the Statue of Liberty. That stupid, awful poem. We are a country. We are a nation. We are allowed to prioritize our own well being. We are allowed to care more about our own people than about the huddled homeless masses and wretched refuse of third world immigrants. Every other country does. They either prioritize their own people or they cease to exist. France has basically ceased to exist as a nation. France is not a country anymore. It doesn't exist. It's not a real country. France is not a real country. France is a cesspool. France is a. I would never go there. I have no interest in ever visiting France because of what it's become. Why would I ever want to go there? To that dirty, filthy cesspool of a country? That's what it's become. That's what it's allowed itself to become. And we don't want to Be that. So France is dead and France wants us to be dead just like them. No, we are a country and we do not. It is actually suicidally insane to have as any kind of national slogan, oh, we'll take all your worst people, bring us all your worst people by the boatload constantly. Please send us the worst people that you have in a never ending stream eternally. No, that is the slogan of a nation that wants to die. It's not our slogan. Never was our slogan. So get rid of the poem, send it to France. Let them have it. You know, I had a new poem that I composed as a. As a replacement, and I would submit this as a replacement once we get rid of the Emma Lazarus poem. Here's my pod. I just composed it. You want to hear it? You didn't know that I was a poet, but I am. It goes, roses are red, violets are blue, America is closed, we don't want you. And put that on the Statue of Liberty. How about that? And put that poem down, right. All engrave it onto the border wall every 10ft. I think it's a beautiful poem. Personal. All right, one other quick clip to play. I don't know why we're going to play this, but we are. Don Lemon showed up on Bill Maher's podcast and he articulated his vision for the future of the Democrat Party. And I personally love his vision. Here it is.

[Kathy Van Treese]

People love aoc. People love Jasmine Crockett. People love Eric Swalwell and the like. And I think that the Democratic Party should put the people out there, who the people want. They should put the. The. The politicians out there, who the people want, who they're asking for, who are meeting the moment with the same energy that they're not asking for aoc. Yes, they are. The people you party with are. No, no, no. People I party with don't like aoc. Oh, please. No, they don't at all. Well, most people don't. But very far left this. Let me tell you why I'm saying that. Because aoc. Because people will vote for AOC and Donald Trump on the same ticket. Because they're authentic. No, because they're authentic. I don't think that. Okay, that. Don, I think you're wrong about that. What people like about people like Trump and Fetterman is there because it's irrelevant to her life. But you don't know her life. I know that being a gorgeous woman who I wouldn't even know was Hispanic in a city that has a million Hispanics.

[Matt Walsh]

So we heard the. Okay. That's enough. We heard kind of the money quote there. People love Eric Swalwell. That's a sentence that this total doofus just said out loud. It is the first time that the words love and Eric Swalwell have ever been used in the same sentence. Maybe the second. Okay, I'm sure the Chinese spy probably told him she loved him. She probably said, I love you, Eric Swalwell, and he didn't even think it was weird that she used his full name. But anyway, Don Lemon has just singled out the three most excruciatingly unlikable people in modern politics and said that people love them. Jasmine Crockett. I mean, imagine being so hopelessly out of touch that you think people love Jasmine Crockett now. First of all, most people have no idea who Jasmine Crockett is. Her name recognition is almost non existent. And if you show them a video of Jasmine Crockett speaking and ask them to guess what she does for a living, most people would say, well, she works the drive thru at Arby's. Oh yeah, I've seen that exact woman at my local Arby's. She works the drive thru. She's always in a bad mood and she always gets my order wrong. If you told them that she's actually a member of Congress, they would be horrified. But this is why the Democrats are doomed. It's not just that they have these unlikable tools in their party. Republicans have unlikable tools too, let's be honest. But it's that nobody on their side has any gut level instinct for what might actually be appealing to the average person. You know, they truly have lost touch completely with the average, but they just have no idea. And so I think we're pretty safe. I mean, if you're a conservative, you're maybe worried that the Democrats are going to figure things out and go and find someone to lead their party in the future who actually has some kind of mass appeal. Somebody who's at least likable at a visceral level. And I think that that's not. I think that we can rest easy. That is obviously not going to happen. Let's get to the comment section. If you're a man, it's required that you grow a big. We're the sweet baby gang. While many fitness influencers offer minimal value at premium prices, FitBody provides comprehensive workout planning and tracking tools designed to help you maintain consistency and achieve real progress. Their expert certified personal trainers have fine tuned their approach to deliver proven exercise science and industry best practices directly to you plus, you can transform your fitness journey with over 1000 demonstration videos to perfect your form and your technique. My producer has been using FitBot has noticed significant improvements in both strength and endurance. The app's recovery tracking prevents overtraining of muscle groups, helps maintain consistent progress. He loves that it introduces new exercises, progressively teaching proper form for various movements throughout their detailed demonstrations. Plus within seconds, fitbod can create a personalized workout based on your goals and available equipment. The app also notices which muscle groups you've been hitting harder, so it automatically adjusts to focus on other muscle groups that are fresh and ready for action. You can keep your fitness routine engaging because the app continuously introduces variety through new exercises, rep patterns, innovative supersets, and challenging circuits, eliminating workout monotony for good. So level up your workout. Join Fitbod today to get your personalized workout plan. Get 25% off your subscription or try the app for free for seven days at Fitbod. Me Walsh that's f I t b o d me Walsh okay, just a couple of comments here. First one El Salvador is becoming my second favorite country in the world behind the U.S. i don't know about second favorite country, but certainly second favorite government. Second favorite world leader. I will say in El Salvador. There are a host of other countries that I'd rather visit than El Salvador, but Bukele is the world leader that I would elect as president of this country. If he was American. You know, if he was American and we could constitutionally elect him, then I would elect him. If Trump actually eats his steaks well done, that's grounds for impeachment. Well, as far as we know, Trump does eat his steaks well done with ketchup. I'm not sure if we have Trump himself on the record saying that he enjoys his steaks that way, but so maybe this is all fake news, but I think it's pretty common knowledge that Trump enjoys well done steaks slathered in ketchup, which. Which is just an abomination. Let's be honest. I mean it's, it's easily the most controversial and offensive thing about him. Easily. I am actually offended by it. Anytime I think about it, I'm personally offended by it. On a deep level. I don't even believe in using steak sauce on your steak. I think using A1 if your steak needs A1 steak sauce in order to be palatable, it means that you didn't cook it well. And if you're eating a high quality steak cooked the right way, you shouldn't need steak sauce. You shouldn't need ketchup for. No, you shouldn't need any seasonings. You know, the people that slather their. You know, their meats and all the. Whatever you get the rub. Buy all the rubs at the. In the. In the seasoning aisle. You just slather that crap on there. And a lot of people think that's good cooking, you know, well, you gotta use a lot of seasoning. Then they just buy this rub and just dump it on there. That's not. That's not good cooking. The whole point of seasoning is to bring the natural flavors of whatever it is out. And so with steak, all you need is for seasoning is salt and pepper. And it's mainly the salt that brings the flavor of the meat out. Not too much. You don't want to overdo it, but that's what you need. That's seasoning. And of course, if you scorch it and cook it until it's a chunk of coal, there are no natural flavors left. So, yeah, Trump with the stake thing, it is horrifying. It just is. I love how Matt picks a different vegetable every time he refers to Biden's mental faculties. Lmao. Well, thanks for noticing that. It means a lot, because these are the little nuances of the show that I always wonder if anyone notices and appreciates. They mean something to me. I take pride in them. I do try to not repeat a vegetable when I'm making a joke about Biden's dementia. So at this point, I've been through the whole salad bar, like, 20 times. I'm gonna have to start reaching for more obscure vegetables. Yeah, I don't. For the joke to work, it has to be a vegetable. Everybody immediately recognizes. But at this point, I'm gonna have to start saying that Biden has the mental capacity of a. Of a Jerusalem artichoke or of a rutabaga. And I don't even know what a rutabaga is, but that's where we're going to find ourselves. Being in customer service for 30 years, I can tell you that customers should take some of the blame. The level of entitlement, the rudeness, the stupidity of some of these people. Makes you hate people if you do customer service for too long. Customer service workers should not have to tolerate being called names, threatened, bullied, harassed, when we're just following the policy of whoever we work for. But people think they can do it and get their way when they're in the wrong. Yeah, look, I agree with what you're saying at Least about the part of some customers can be awful. I try to be very polite to customer service workers. I try my best to not cause any problems. I tip very well. I'm a great tipper. Anyone who's ever been my waiter or waitress can attest to that. I. I'm also cognizant of the fact that in many cases, if I have an issue with a business, the person I'm talking to likely has nothing to do with the issue and didn't cause the issue. Of course, on our end as customers, that's what causes a lot of the frustration, that if we have a problem with, you know, Verizon or some big company like this and we have to call somebody and the company has done something wrong, they've screwed up, we can't find anyone to talk to who is let alone responsible for it. We can't find anyone to talk to actually cares about the problem. And so that creates. And so when you talk about the awful customers, a lot of it is just frustration on our end that we've got some problem. It might be a significant problem. Maybe it's a problem with the billing. Maybe it's a big problem with the service or whatever. And we're trying to talk to someone who at least will care enough to get the problem solved. And we go through 15 people and nobody cares, and we can't get our problem solved. Yes, we get frustrated also. And that's your job to deal with. That's why you're paid. Dealing with difficult and frustrated customers is the job. People are difficult. Your job is dealing with people, which means your job is dealing with difficult people, because people are difficult. That's the whole job. And so, yes, you can commiserate. You can complain about it in your break rooms and amongst yourselves. When I work customer service, I certainly did. But your job is to put on a happy face and to have happy, positive energy and to deal with difficult customers and to not get frustrated, no matter how frustrated they are. That, again, is the job. So it's just like, it's probably. It probably gets emotionally exhausting for a doctor to deal with sick people all the time. But that's the job. I understand how it might be taxing, but that is the job. That's the whole thing. That's the whole job, is to do that. So, no, I mean, if a doctor loses his cool and starts screaming at a patient, I'm not gonna be understanding of that. You don't want to do this, then don't sign up for the job. Do something Else the left needed a trophy. So they took Derek Chauvin and threw him in prison. This was never about justice. It was about appeasing the mob and flexing their power. And now Ben Shapiro is exposing every lie, every manipulation and every failure of our so called justice system in his new five part investigative series, the Case for Derek Chauvin. Episode one is out now. New episodes drop every Tuesday and Thursday exclusively on the Ben Shapiro Show. Watch it, share it. And if you actually care about the truth, join the conversation inside the Daily Wire plus app. The system was rigged, the truth was buried, and the Daily Wire is fighting to make things right. Now let's get to our daily cancellation. A few years ago, you may remember that there was a concerted effort on the Left to cancel Dr. Seuss of all people. And it went all the way up to the Biden administration. The White House removed all of Dr. Seuss books from Read Across America Day, which is an annual celebration that takes place on Dr. Seuss's birthday. Officially, Dr. Seuss's crime, which had somehow gone undetected for the better part of a century, was that he didn't include enough so called people of color in his various children's books. The University of California even conducted an exhaustive investigation into the matter, and in the end they found that out of the approximately 20, or rather 2,000 human characters in Dr. Seuss books, only 45 were non white. On top of that, some of these non white cartoon characters were not drawn to the satisfaction of left wing activists. And as if that wasn't bad enough, Dr. Seuss wasn't even a real doctor. He was like the Dr. Pepper of children's literature. And therefore Dr. Seuss was canceled. His name was banned from his own birthday celebration. Now, of course, these justifications were pretexts. Anyone capable of reading at the first grade level could see that Dr. Seuss wrote allegories about why racism is bad about as explicitly as he possibly could. We're not talking about subtle messaging here. And that's the real reason why ultimately Dr. Seuss had to be canceled. The belief that racism is morally wrong is incompatible with leftism, which is now premised on attacking and demonizing white people at every opportunity. They just couldn't say that part out loud. So instead they pretended that they were canceling Dr. Seuss for being a racist, when in fact the exact opposite was true. He committed the mortal sin of teaching children that all forms of race hatred, including race hatred against white people, is wrong. And in a lot of ways we're Seeing a similar effort unfold right now in the UK, where William Shakespeare is getting the Dr. Seuss treatment. For all their differences, Dr. Seuss and Shakespeare do have one thing in common, which is that they both pose a clear and intolerable threat to anti white racial narratives that have become fashionable on the left. Shakespeare, as arguably the greatest and most prolific writer to ever live, is an example of excellence that very few other countries or cultures have ever come close to matching. There is no Shakespeare of Africa or Shakespeare of Pakistan, for example. And if you're trying to make the case that those countries and cultures are far superior to places like America and Europe because they have fewer white people, which is the argument the leftists genuinely try to make, then Shakespeare's status is obviously inconvenient. After all these years, he stands alone. So now they're coming for him too. But as we saw with Dr. Seuss, they're not going to admit that that's why they're doing it. Instead of saying that they want to tear down Shakespeare because he was white, they're saying that Shakespeare needs to be decolonized. This is a word we've talked about before in several different contexts, and every single time it's used. Decolonization is always a cover for anti white hatred and ultimately for racial violence. They claim that it's about removing remnants of colonialism, whatever that means. Exactly. But really their motives are transparent. Quoting from the Daily Mail says, quote, william Shakespeare's birthplace will be decolonized over fears that portraying his success as the greatest playwright benefits the ideology of white European supremacy. Shakespeare's Birthplace Trust owns buildings in the playwright's hometown. It wants to create a more inclusive museum experience and announce that it will move away from Western perspectives after concerns were raised that Shakespeare's ideas were used to advance white supremacy's ideas. Close quote. Yes, they're supposedly going to decolonize the place where William Shakespeare was born. And they're going to accomplish that task by installing foreign influences from all over the world into the place where where Shakespeare was born. They're going to import Juliet inspired Bollywood dance workshops, for example, and they're going to host events celebrating Bengali poets. Presumably. They're also going to remove a bunch of Shakespeare themed objects from the Shakespeare Museum in the place where Shakespeare was born. They're going to replace them with more inclusive artifacts. In other words, they're going to decolonize Shakespeare's birthplace by colonizing it until it's completely and totally unrecognizable. I mean, if the word colonize means anything anymore, which it doesn't, then that's exactly what they're doing to this little town. And things make less sense when you realize that Shakespeare wasn't alive anywhere near the period when Britain became a sprawling worldwide empire. Britain was just beginning to settle North America when he died, which is why saying Shakespeare is a relic of colonialism. It's a bit like saying that Mark Twain is a symbol of the moon landing. I mean, the timing doesn't really work. To find out more, I looked a little deeper into the whole Shakespeare decolonization effort. I dove headfirst into the belly of the beast, and I came to find out that it's been active in this country for a while, too. So here, for example, is a lecture delivered by an English professor from Arizona State University named Ayanna Thompson. Watch as she explains what exactly it means to decolonize Shakespeare.

[E]

So in thinking about how you can encourage an oppositional gaze or decolonized thinking in your Shakespeare classroom, I think one of the things that you can start with is by encouraging juxtaposition. So it's not just creating juxtaposition. Right. So it's not just that you say we should read August Wilson's King Headley next to William Shakespeare's King Lear, which by the way, do go really well together. It's that you also allow your students to bring in things that they want to juxtapose with Shakespeare. Tunderai, I think his last name is pronounced Amanye Vu, is a Zimbabwean playwright, and he has also written a play about Shakespeare called the Moors, and it's quite brilliant and interesting. So I just feel like there's so many ways to allow dialogues to exist. Jay Z, of course, he's got a lot to say about Shakespeare. A lot, a lot. And if you explore some of his interviews, Shakespeare keeps coming up and he keeps asking interviewers who are challenging him about why he thinks he's the best, and he keeps saying, why don't you think I'm Shakespeare? And he said this numerous times. It's really interesting. So, you know, why not allow your students to bring that into the classroom?

[Matt Walsh]

Jay Z in Shakespeare is indeed quite the juxtaposition. This is the cutting edge of academia, apparently. Just think of all the places students could go with it. They could talk about how sorry they are for Macbeth, because while they might have 99 problems, which ain't one, or they could ask the age old question, to be or not to be big pimpin. I mean, the possibilities are just endless. And those are the extent of my Shakespeare Jay Z crossover puns that I could come up with. By the way, tuition to attend this professor's school runs up to $32,000 for out of state students. So if you want your child to be able to experience life changing lessons like this, you better start saving now. I mean, it's worth every penny in case you fell asleep during that clip, the professor begins by saying that decolonizing Shakespeare is all about juxtaposition and the oppositional gaze or whatever. It's a fancy way of saying that instead of talking about Shakespeare, you talk about non white writers and entertainers instead. That's the whole scam. I watched a decent amount of this lecture for which I deserve hazard pay of some kind, and pretty much the entire thing is her rattling off a bunch of random, mostly no name non white people that she wants to promote. That's what decolonizing means. I guess it means assigning a ton of literature based on the skin color of the person who wrote it so that you don't have to talk about Shakespeare. Of course, they try to drown this nonsense with so much academic jargon that no sane person can make sense of it or even sit through it. That's because when you strip away the filibustering and the jargon, you're left with anti white race hatred. This is what decolonization is about. It's what it's always been about. Shakespeare is perhaps the single greatest writer to ever live. And that may make a lot of people angry, it might undermine a lot of racial narratives, but it happens to be true. And no matter how much Jay Z and Toni Morrison you force students to pay attention and no matter what you do to Shakespeare's hometown, it will remain true. And that is why everyone attempting to cancel William Shakespeare and to decolonize his birthplace are today canceled. That'll do for the show today. Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening. Talk to you tomorrow. Have a great day. Godspeed.