Ep. 1684 - A Foreign Invasion Is Underway, But This Is What Can Be Done To Stop It

Summary

The Matt Walsh Show – Episode 1684

“A Foreign Invasion Is Underway, But This Is What Can Be Done To Stop It”

Date: November 3, 2025
Host: Matt Walsh (The Daily Wire)

---

Overview

In this episode, Matt Walsh reacts to the anticipated election of "a Ugandan commie and a far left con artist from Somalia" as mayors of New York and Minneapolis. He frames their rise as evidence of a “foreign invasion” undermining America, attributing the threat to the failure of assimilation and mass migration. Walsh proposes a series of practical solutions that, in his view, could stem the tide, calling on Republicans—who he notes control Congress and the White House—to aggressively legislate in defense of American identity and sovereignty. The episode also covers Trump's threat to Nigeria over Christian persecution, Kamala Harris's push to lower the voting age, Wanda Sykes's public admission of hiring discrimination, and a YouTuber's attack on Charlie Kirk’s widow. The tone is combative, urgent, critical, and deeply skeptical of mainstream left-wing ideas and immigration policy.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. The Historic Parallel: Civilizational Collapse and “Barbarians at the Gates”

Timestamp: 05:01–06:06

• Walsh draws analogies between America today and past civilizations (Byzantines, Ottomans, even modern Canada), arguing that internal division distracted leaders from external threats, resulting in collapse.

• Quote:
  “It’s the highest luxury for wealthy and prosperous civilizations to fight amongst themselves right up until the moment they realize that in reality, the barbarians aren’t simply at the gates anymore. They've made their way inside and no one's even noticed.” —Matt Walsh (05:45)

• Message: The current explosion of conservative infighting is dangerous and trivial in comparison to external threats posed by foreign “invasion.”

2. The Threat: The Rise of Foreign-Born, Left-Wing Politicians

Timestamp: 07:15–09:29

• Walsh claims that Omar Fateh (Somali-American) in Minneapolis and Zoran Mamdani (Ugandan-American) in New York are about to seize “control” of major cities, characterizing them negatively (as "Islamic socialist", "scam artist", and "communist").
• He insists these politicians do not represent American interests.
• Message: “If foreigners who want to destroy the US are able to seize control of our largest cities, then nothing else matters… We will have ceased to exist as a country.” —Matt Walsh (07:29–08:04)

3. The Call to Action: Proposals for Legislative Solutions

Timestamp: 09:47–24:36

• Walsh lays out concrete policy demands, urging Republicans to legislate immediately, dismissing concerns about legal challenges or filibusters:

Main Proposals

A. Ban Non-English Political Communications (12:51–16:17)

• Outlaw campaign events and ads in any language but English.
• Require politicians and candidates to demonstrate English proficiency.
• Quote: “American voters should always know what their leaders are saying… Any voter who needs a candidate or politician to speak in another language shouldn't be a voter.” —Matt Walsh (12:51–13:14)
• Cites Arizona’s laws to support constitutional legitimacy.

B. English Proficiency Test for Voters (16:25–17:51)

• Anyone unable to speak English would be prohibited from voting.
• Argues this is less controversial than existing bans on felons voting.
• Quote: “If we’re going to ban felons from voting, then we should ban foreign language speakers from voting too.” —Matt Walsh (17:45)

C. Ban Dual Citizenship for Politicians; Pledge Total Loyalty (17:53–19:49)

• Candidates must renounce dual citizenship and swear exclusive loyalty to the United States before running.
• Quote: “You should not be able to run for office unless you’re willing to swear total, absolute fealty to this country to the exclusion of every other country.” —Matt Walsh (18:32–18:39)

D. Welfare-Based Immigration Moratorium ("10 in 10 Law") (20:21–22:02, 23:37)

• If over 10% of immigrants from a given country are on welfare, all immigration from that nation should be barred for ten years.

• Quote: “If a significant number of immigrants from a country are coming here to leech off of our people… then we need to shut off the spigot.” —Matt Walsh (21:12–21:22)

• Message: Republicans are failing to use their current majority power; Walsh calls for relentless focus on these “practical” solutions to protect America’s future.

4. Foreign Policy: Trump’s Threat Over Christian Persecution in Nigeria

Timestamp: 28:14–35:53

• Trump threatens to withhold aid from Nigeria and suggests direct military intervention (“guns a blazing”) if the government fails to stop the killing of Christians.
• Walsh agrees with cutting off aid—and questions the rationale for sending billions in foreign aid that does not benefit Americans nor improve Nigeria’s situation.
• Quote: “Can anyone point to, like, a tangible improvement, a tangible positive impact in America that stems from the $8 billion investment we’ve made in Nigeria?” —Matt Walsh (37:19–37:35)

5. U.S. Voting Policy: Critique of Lowering the Voting Age

Timestamp: 38:50–45:53

• Kamala Harris advocates lowering the voting age to 16, citing Gen Z’s challenges (climate anxiety, job instability).
• Walsh ridicules the idea, arguing 18 is a logical boundary (adulthood), and if you go lower it becomes an arbitrary line. He jokes voting age should actually rise with his own age.
• Quote: “If you start lowering the voting age...there is no line that makes sense to draw.” —Matt Walsh (41:45)

6. DEI and Discrimination: Wanda Sykes' Hiring Admission

Timestamp: 46:01–55:13

• Wanda Sykes publicly admits she gives hiring preference to women (especially black women) regardless of qualifications.
• Walsh calls for investigation, claiming this is a civil rights violation—and suggests DEI policies cause suspicion of black women’s qualifications in top positions.
• Notable quote:
  “You have to wonder, anytime a black woman is in an important position… did they get that job because they happen to be the most qualified, or did they get it because they were hired by somebody like Wanda Sykes...?” —Matt Walsh (53:13–53:19)

7. Personal Attacks & The Real Enemy: The Left’s Hostility After Charlie Kirk’s Death

Timestamp: 56:17–68:25

• YouTuber Kyle Kulinski posts a mocking meme targeting Erica Kirk, widow of late conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
• Walsh condemns this as evidence of the left’s “cartoonish evil” and lack of basic humanity.
• Quote:
  “These are people who will celebrate your death and then laugh in the face of your mourning loved ones. They will piss on your grave and spit on your grieving spouse. These are people who have no honor.” —Matt Walsh (59:30–59:54)
• Message: The left is united, implacable, and hostile; conservatives should stop infighting and focus on this shared enemy.

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On Civilizational Decline:
  “Once we become Somalia or Uganda, we’ve lost everything and we can never get it back.” (08:06)

• On Political Will:
  “We have power right now… and we’re not spending every single moment of every day talking about real things we can do to use that power…” (22:37–22:39)

• On U.S. Foreign Aid:
  “There is no American who has benefited… by the fact that we’re spending billions of dollars on Nigeria.” (35:01–35:06)

• On Lowering the Voting Age:
  “Why not have infants vote? I mean if you start lowering the voting age… there’s no, there is no line that makes sense to draw.” (41:32–41:45)

• On Left-Wing Online Culture:
  “You’re barely a human being if this is how you treat a grieving widow. You have no soul. You forfeited your soul.” (62:45–62:54)

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• 05:01 – Civilizational precedent for collapse due to ignoring foreign threats
• 07:15 – Foreign-born leftist politicians and the “threat” to U.S. cities
• 09:47 – Legislative action the GOP could take
• 12:51 – Ban non-English campaign communications and require English for voters
• 16:25 – English proficiency test for voters
• 17:53 – Ban on dual citizenship and loyalty oath for candidates
• 20:21 – Immigration ban from high-welfare-use countries (“10 in 10” policy)
• 28:14 – Trump’s “guns a blazing” threat to Nigeria
• 38:50 – Kamala Harris & lowering the voting age
• 46:01 – Wanda Sykes admits gender/race hiring bias
• 56:17 – Attacks on Erica Kirk, widow of Charlie Kirk, by leftists

---

Tone & Closing Message

Walsh closes with a forceful reminder to prioritize unity in the conservative movement and not lose sight of the existential threat he believes is posed by mass migration and leftist antagonism. He repeatedly frames the left as dishonorable, beyond redemption or compromise, and accuses conservatives of being too distracted or complacent to meet the moment.

---

Episode takeaway: Walsh calls for an aggressive, unapologetic legislative response to immigration and assimilation, demands a refocusing of conservative energies on “the real enemy,” and warns listeners of ongoing hostility from the left—both in public policy and personal attacks.

Transcript

[Matt Walsh]

Let's be honest. If you're a gun owner and you're.

Still shooting unsuppressed, you're messing up. You've got a great gun, you've got decent aim, but you're still out there making your range days loud when they don't need to be. A suppressor from Silencer Shop fixes that.

Less noise, less recoil.

No more walking away from the range with your ears ringing.

Silencer Shop takes your gun from good.

To greater than you ever imagined and makes it easy. Silencer Shop has the largest selection of suppressors in the country. A approvals are coming in at record speeds and their expert team can help you with anything you need.

No guesswork, no bureaucratic headaches, just better.

Range days and hunting trips. And when it comes to the second Amendment, Silencer Shop puts their money where their mouth is, supporting your rights more than just about anyone else.

Go to silencershop.com Walsh today and start.

Shooting smarter, quieter and better.

That's silencershop.com Walsh because if you're serious.

About freedom, you you ought to shoot.

Like it silence or shop because your.

Rights and your ears are worth protecting.

[John Bickley]

Hey guys. Finding the perfect gift for the food lover in your life is easy thanks to Gold Belly. Gold Belly ships America's most iconic foods straight from world famous restaurants right to your door. So if you want to treat someone to Joe's Stone Crab from Miami, Franklin Barbecue from Texas, or desserts from famous foodies like Ina Garten or Martha Stewart, Goldbelly has you covered. Just go to goldbelly.com and for a limited time get 20% off your first order with promo code gift. That's Promo Code gift Today the Matt.

[Matt Walsh]

Wall show is A Ugandan commie and a far left con artist from Somalia are on the verge of winning their bids to take over two major American cities.

Want to talk about practical solutions that.

Might prevent this from ever happening again and turn back the tide on the foreign invasion that has crippled our country.

Also, Trump threatens to go in guns.

A blazing to stop the persecution of Christians in Nigeria.

Kamala Harris calls for lowering the voting age to 16. Wanda Sykes confesses to a civil rights violation. And a far left YouTuber viciously attacks Charlie Kirk's widow, proving again who our.

Real enemies are in case we needed the reminder. And a lot of us do all of that and more today on the Matt Walsh.

Data brokers spy on your.

Online activity and profit from it. They monitor everything you click on and do online, then sell that information to other companies and even foreign governments. There have even been cases where they knowingly sold people's private data to fraudulent companies.

That's why I use ExpressVPN to stay.

Protected from these Big Brother Data brokers. With ExpressVPN, 100% of your online activity travels through secure, encrypted tunnels, keeping everything.

You do completely private.

No one, not data brokers, big tech companies, or even your Internet provider can track your behavior. ExpressVPN also hides your IP address, the unique number used to identify you online, leaving data brokers with nothing valuable to sell for US customers.

ExpressVPN's new Identity Defender feature removes your.

Data from data brokers files, monitors the dark web for leaked information, and alerts you if someone tries to use your Social Security number. This isn't about hiding shady behavior. It's about your privacy.

As more of our lives move online.

More of our personal moments are being watched and monetized. Protect yourself with ExpressVPN because privacy is essential. As someone who spends hours researching for each show, I rely on ExpressVPN constantly, whether I'm digging into sensitive topics or just browsing without my ISP logging every search. I can't imagine doing research without that protection, especially when I have to connect to airport or public wi fi on the go. Right now, you can get an extra four months when you use my special link. Go to expressvpn.com Walsh and get four extra months of ExpressVPN. That's E-P R E S S vpn.com.

Walsh there's no way around it. When it comes to healthcare, people are.

Really frustrated with how much it costs and how to pay for it.

Usual ways that we've been doing this have only gotten more expensive, more complicated.

And of course, aggravating.

And that's why Medishare is such a welcome relief. It's called healthcare sharing and it's different. But look, it works.

More than a million Americans are now doing this, and Medishare has been a.

Great option for more than 30 years. So really, you could save thousands of.

Dollars a year on your health care and be happy. Imagine that it could happen. If you've heard about it and you know and you want to know more.

There are two easy options.

Go to metashare.com matt that's metashare.com matt or just grab your phone and send a text. You'll get the info which could really help you and your family out. Text the word MATT to 70246 to get the fax.

Text MATT to 70246 and you'll get.

The link that's MATT to 70246.

You can fill a very large museum.

With exhibits about empires that collapsed because as barbarians gathered outside the gates, their leaders were distracted by relatively unimportant internal conflicts.

And certainly you could set up rows and rows of bookshelves at the Louvre.

With volume after volume going into detail about how various civilizations, from the Byzantines to the Ottomans to the Canadians, met.

Their demise because they were unable or.

Unwilling to address the very real looming threats they were facing from the outside.

And then, of course, once you meticulously.

Assembled all these books documenting these historical examples and placed them in a Louvre.

Those books would probably be stolen by.

A handful of burglars armed with power tools.

So, put another way, it's the highest.

Luxury for wealthy and prosperous civilizations to.

Fight amongst themselves right up until the moment they realize that in reality, the barbarians aren't simply at the gates anymore. They've made their way inside and no one's even noticed.

And by that point, it's too late. The foreign conquest is plain for everyone to see right at the moment when you can't do anything about it.

So if you don't see where I'm going with this, then that's probably a.

Good sign, if I'm being honest. There's no reason to recap any of the infighting that's occurring right now among the conservative movement. If you're not aware of the extraordinary degree of internal squabbling on the right.

Which I suspect that most average conservatives.

Probably aren't, well, that's a point in your favor anyway. It's an indication that you don't spend much of your time online, paying attention to the endless bickering on social media.

But suffice it to say, many conservatives.

Are at each other's throats at the moment. They're certainly at my throat from every angle, even though none of them can really explain what it is I've done or said that they find so objectionable.

I also haven't changed my goal, which.

Is advancing the interests of this country and of the Americans who live here.

That's all I've ever tried to do or ever really talked about. But here's the important thing.

No matter where you stand on these attacks and all this drama, if you're even aware of, it really doesn't matter. What matters is that while conservatives are busy ripping each other to shreds, an Islamic socialist from Uganda is about to.

Take over the biggest city in the country.

And at the same time, as if.

That'S not enough, a far left Somali scam artist is about to take over.

One of the biggest cities in America's heartland, Minneapolis.

And this is the kind of threat.

That a serious country and a serious.

Political movement would prioritize above any other. If foreigners who want to destroy the US Are able to seize control of our largest cities, then nothing else matters. Okay? Whatever it is that you're worried about doesn't matter. Foreign policy doesn't matter. Podcasts, even, even the most offensive and racist podcasts you can think of don't matter.

The Constitution doesn't matter. The Heritage foundation doesn't matter.

Nothing matters at all in that scenario, because we will have ceased to exist.

As a country, okay?

Once we become Somalia or Uganda, we've lost everything and we can never get it back. Now, no one needs me to outline.

The case against Omar Fateh, who's probably going to be the next mayor of Minneapolis.

No one needs me to outline the.

Case against Zoran Mamdani, who's probably going to be the next mayor of New York. Nor does anyone, at least in this audience, need me to make the case against mass migration more broadly, or Somali immigration in particular, or anything like that. We've beaten that drum many, many times.

Before, and, and we'll continue to. To beat it. But really, especially if you live in.

Places like New York or Minneapolis or any of the thousands of American suburbs that have become unrecognizable in the past 20 years, you don't really need to watch any monologue about it, listen to any podcast about it.

You've already seen firsthand exactly what the problem is and how it's about to.

Get much, much worse unless we actually take some meaningful action, because again, if we don't, the country's over. And I'm not saying that if Zoran Mamdani is elected and Fateh is elected, you know, in their elections, that the country's over in that case, because, like, that is probably going to happen, and, and we still have a chance as a country.

But if we just submit finally to.

This invasion, then the country is over.

It's just done.

We don't have a country anymore.

If the country comes to reflect the.

Vision of somebody like Zoran Mamdani, then that's the end of the country, because that's what he wants. That's his vision.

Now, the good news, although it's easy.

To forget it, is that meaningful action is indeed possible.

The Republican Party currently has control of.

Both houses of Congress, in addition to the White House.

In Case you forgot, conservatives have the power to prevent any more American cities from being taken over by foreign communists.

So in the interest of being constructive, instead of, you know, simply identifying the problem that we've all identified by now or those of us who are sane and have common sense have identified, I.

Just wanted to outline a few proposals. Right. Which. Which the Republican Congress could and should pass into law immediately. So here are some actual practical solutions that we could talk about, and not just talk about, but that could be pursued.

We have.

We have the power right now to do it. But before I do so, I need.

To preempt the objections that are going to sound something like this.

You know, people will say, well, the courts might strike that down, or, well, the Democrats would filibuster. Yeah, it's true that courts might strike.

Down these proposals just like they've struck down every single policy the Trump administration has attempted to implement. And, yeah, Democrats might filibuster the legislation.

But that doesn't mean that we're out of options.

We can eliminate the filibuster. We can appeal rulings by lower court judges, and if necessary, we can ignore them if it comes down to it.

But I don't think that will be.

Necessary, though, because the proposals I'm about to outline are indeed both constitutional and obviously necessary.

And for my first proposal, by way of background, take a look at these.

Recent appearances by Omar Fateh, the scam artist running for mayor of Minneapolis, who's become known as the Mamdani of the Midwest.

[Omar Fateh]

Watch have better communication between the mayor and the chief and also the city Council members, so that whenever we know something's coming down the pike, that city Council is alerted immediately because they're the connection point to community, and they can articulate that and disseminate that information to folks. I think that's really important. Salam Alikum. Asalam Alikum. Somalia. Somalia. Hiran State. Early voting was November 4th. I need your vote. I need you.

[Matt Walsh]

So he's waving the Somali flag.

He's speaking in a foreign language. He's pledging fealty to Somalia.

He's talking about tipping off illegals in.

Advance of ICE raids. He clearly understands that his constituency is Somalis like himself, not Americans.

And he's not ashamed of any of this, because, as we've discussed before, Somalis.

Are now a dominant voting bloc in Minneapolis, which is home to the largest Somali population in the entire country.

The solution, or one of them, one thing that we could do is ban.

Politicians and candidates from holding rallies or creating advertisements in Any language but English.

American voters should always know what their leaders are saying. This is basic ask, you know, any voter who can't speak English. Any voter who needs a candidate or politician to speak in another language shouldn't be a voter should not be voting in the first place. Now, right away, I can imagine the replies, that violates the First Amendment. Well, actually, it doesn't.

It's not a restriction on the content of anyone's speech. Politicians can have whatever ideas they want.

It's a restriction on how that speech is delivered.

And we have many restrictions like that.

That's why politicians can't campaign within 50ft of a polling place.

That's why politicians can't blast their campaign.

Advertisements at 2am with a bullhorn outside of your house. There's a lot of different ways that they cannot convey their message. So the principle is pretty clear. Speech becomes unlawful when and only when.

The government has a clear and unambiguous need to to regulate that speech in order for the country and its government to remain functional. And in the context of laws that require candidates to speak English, there's precedent.

To back this up, consider the case of Alejandri Alahin Alandrina Cabrera, which you.

You probably haven't heard of this, but a little over a decade ago, she ran for city council in Arizona, but.

There was a problem with her candidacy.

The law in Arizona requires that elected officials have the capacity to speak decent English. This is from Time magazine.

Quote, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled last.

Week that Cabrera did not meet the state's requirement that elected officials must be proficient in English. Cabrera's candidacy became an issue when the mayor political rival of hers filed a.

Lawsuit claiming that her lack of English.

Proficiency made her ineligible. Cabrera, an American citizen who spent some of her childhood in Mexico, knows some English.

When she was questioned at trial, she.

Was able to state her name in.

Place, place of birth, but she could.

Not answer a question about which high school she attended. In much of the country, Cabrera would not have a problem. Candidates do not have to prove that they know English, but Arizona enacted a.

Law in 2006 that bars people who.

Do not speak, write and read English from holding state or local offices. Now here's more coverage in the New York Times.

Quote, When Cabrera speaks English, her face takes on an expression somewhere between deep discomfort and outright despair.

Her tongue, which darts around in her.

Mouth in her native Spanish, slows to a crawl. In his report, which was detailed in.

A court hearing on Wednesday, William Eggington, a professor of English and linguistics at.

Brigham Young University in Utah, said that based on interviews and tests he conducted with Ms. Cabrera, she had basic survival level English that fell well below that.

Needed to participate in city business.

This is the law, the city attorney.

Said, arguing that the 1910 act granting Arizona statehood required officeholders to perform their duties in English without the aid of a translator.

It's been on the book since statehood. So she was tossed from the ballot and that was it.

I mean, it's as simple as that. If the state of Arizona can have a law like this, then the federal.

Government can and should impose a similar restriction on every candidate in every office. Now, we can require that candidates speak.

Coherent English instead of a foreign language when they're campaigning. And there's. There's no First Amendment violation here. If anything, the First Amendment and the Constitution requires we have a law like this.

The country cannot exist for much longer without it. And while we're at it, we should require an English language proficiency test for.

Voters when they register to vote.

And again, the principle is the same.

If you can't speak English, then you shouldn't be voting. You're not really an American.

You're not capable of interacting with other Americans in this country. You haven't made the slightest effort to assimilate into our country. And if you're allowed to vote, what does that mean? Well, it means you'll protect your own.

Country'S interests, not America's. And for that reason, there is a clear and compelling government interest in preventing you from voting. Just like we prevent felons from voting.

Yes, in this country, it's entirely possible.

For an American citizen to lose his.

Right to vote by becoming a felon. And many states have laws like that on the books. But ask yourself this question. Who's more dangerous in the voting booth? A Somali communist who can't speak a word of English? Who wants to drain every dollar from the U.S. treasury and send it back to Somalia? Or a guy who hasn't paid his.

Taxes in five years?

Who's more dangerous in the voting booth? A Muslim socialist from Uganda who can't speak English and who wants to dismantle the police force?

Or a guy who committed insurance fraud five years ago? Now, we all know the answers to these questions. If we're going to ban felons from voting, then we should ban foreign language.

Speakers from voting, too.

If they can't speak English, if they're not proficient in English.

We should also require all politicians and.

Candidates to renounce any dual citizenships they.

May hold and publicly pledge their total and absolute loyalty to the US to the absolute exclusion of all other nations. Now, from a First Amendment standpoint, this.

Should not be controversial either. As to the latter part, you know, we already make elected officials take an oath of office. Of course, many public servants in various fields have the same obligation. That's because the Constitution explicitly states that.

Office holders shall be bound by oath.

Or affirmation to support this Constitution.

So all I'm proposing is that we move the oath forward a bit to the candidate stage. You should not be able to run.

For office in this country unless you're.

Willing to swear total, absolute fealty to.

This country to the exclusion of every other country.

And if you're not willing to do that, then you should not be allowed.

To run for office in the first place.

Now, yeah, a candidate can lie, but.

At least this country would be spared the indignity of watching Somali politicians telling us to our faces for months on.

End that they don't actually care about representing Americans. You know, they'd have to pretend to.

Care about this country. And for some of them, particularly the, you know, the inbred ones, that. That might be too difficult to fake.

And some of them would be unwilling to do it. Would Omar Fateh be willing, in the candidate phase? Would he be willing to. To get up there? Would he have been willing to get up there in. As.

As a.

As a prerequisite to run for office?

Would he have been willing to stand.

Up and say, I swear my absolute.

Loyalty to this country. I put this country above every other country, including Somalia?

Would he have even been willing to say that? Probably not.

And additionally, as to the second proposal I just made, dual citizens are already subjected to dramatically increased scrutiny when they're trying to obtain, say, a top secret security clearance. So there's no reason that we shouldn't impose even more scrutiny when a dual citizen tries to run for office, given the obvious conflict of interest that's involved.

Again, there is precedent.

You know, we don't even need to make an argument.

We just need to pass a law immediately. And here's one more idea while I'm at it, that would. That would clear up a lot of.

These problems and would also make it so that someone like Mamdani or. Or Fateh would never be able to be elected ever again.

So here's just an idea. If over 10% of immigrants from a certain country are on welfare in this.

Country, then we should ban all immigration from that country for the next 10 years. Okay?

There's.

There's a Reasonable policy.

And, you know, 10 and 10 is kind of arbitrary. You could set the threshold anywhere.

5%, 20%, doesn't matter.

But you could set it at.01%.

I mean, that's where I'd prefer to put it.

But I'm so I'm being kind of generous in, in where I set the.

The bar being very reasonable.

But the point is that if a.

Significant number of immigrants from a country are coming here to leech off of our people rather than to contribute to, to this nation and its people, then.

We need to shut off the spigot. And this should be the safest proposal.

Of all the ones I've, I've laid out. Foreigners don't have any right to enter this country in the first place. It's a. And we should obviously shut it down.

Immediately if it's turning into a burden for American taxpayers. You know, last week we talked about.

How well over 50% of illegal aliens receive food stamps, many of them from countries like Somalia, Haiti, Iraq.

So terminate all migration from these countries immediately.

For at least 10 years. And again, you could say 50 years, 100 years. I mean, I'd be in favor of that. But I, again, I'm being very generous.

10 years.

Shut it off for 10 years. We'll save a lot of money, be much better for this country, and we won't have Haitians, you know, winning the mayor's race in Ohio anytime soon. So it's a win.

Win. Now, if you want to quibble with.

Some of these proposals, that's fine. Maybe you think some of them won't work. These are just kind of a few ideas off the top of my head.

The point is, this is the kind.

Of thing that we should be talking about every single day.

This is what drives me nuts, is.

That we have power right now, and.

We'Re not spending every single moment of every day talking about real things we can do to use that power to solve some of these problems, the big problems. How is that not the focal point every single day? We're not going to have this power forever. This is a short window that we have right now, and it is closing. And these are the kinds of proposals that conservatives, whether they're posting on social media or hosting a podcast or working.

At a think tank or anywhere else.

Should be spending their time on.

These are proposals that advance conservatism and.

More importantly, preserve the future of this country. It's what, it's what we elected conservatives to do. So why aren't they doing it? Why isn't I've thrown the idea.

I don't want the first person to have an idea like this.

Call it the 10 in 10 law or whatever. 10% on welfare, 10 year ban. Could someone explain what the downside would be to that? What would be the downside? How would it hurt America? Can anyone say, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, we can't do that. That's really going to hurt us. Can anyone make that case? I'd love to hear it, but nobody can. No one would be able to explain what the problem would be. And any attempt to explain the problem would focus on how it would negatively impact the third world country where these people are coming from. But that is not our concern, is it? Or it shouldn't be. So, Republicans, the ball's in your court. Someone pick up, pick it up. Propose the law. You can even take credit for it. Go ahead, I don't care. I just want to get it done.

Why aren't we getting it done?

Until anyone can explain that, it's our.

Responsibility to demand that Republicans answer this.

Simple and fundamental question.

What are you doing to ensure that.

Some of the most important cities in.

This country are actually run by Americans instead of foreign subversives like Zoran Mamdani and Omar Fateh? That's the question that matters. And before another conservative fires another volley at anyone else on the right, before another major American city falls, someone in power needs to answer it while our.

Side still has power to wield.

Now let's get to our five headlines.

What if you could actually find what.

You'Re looking for instead of wandering around like an idiot? Parking spots that don't require prayer, gifts that don't scream last minute panic. Jeans that fit without trying on 17 pairs. Wild concept, right? Well, just think of all the time you'd save time you're currently wasting. While you may never instantly find these things, if you're hiring, you can find qualified candidates right away, time and time again with ZipRecruiter.

And today you can try for free.

At ZipRecruiter.com Walsh finding the right talent doesn't have to feel like searching for a needle in a haystack.

ZipRecruiter's powerful matching technology cuts through the.

Noise, and that connects you with top candidates fast. No endless scrolling, no guesswork, just results. Their advanced resume database gives you instant access to contact information for qualified professionals so you can reach out to people who actually want to hire. You actually want to hire without having to jump through all the hoops.

It's kind of efficiency that changes how.

You think about recruiting and it's working. ZipRecruiter has earned its spot as the number one rated hiring site on G2, trusted by businesses. The need to build great teams without wasting time on platforms that overcomplicate the process. Want to know right away how many qualified candidates are in your area?

Look no further than ZipRecruiter. Four to five employers who post on.

ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the first day. And right now you can try it.

For [e-mail] Walsh Again, that's ziprecruiter.com Walsh ZipRecruiter the smartest way to hire with the holidays coming up, all those dinners.

Those moments around the table with family, I want to make sure every meal is special. That's why I use Good Ranchers. All their meat is 100% American, raised on local farms and delivered right to my door.

The quality? Well, it's truly incredible.

Whether it's a holiday roast, bacon for Christmas morning breakfast or chicken for a nice family dinner, knowing exactly where my meat comes from gives me and my family peace of mind. And honestly, people notice the difference. The flavors are truly better. The holidays are, you know, they're about bringing people together and creating memories over good food.

When you're serving America's best meat, those.

Meals become even more meaningful. It's the kind of quality your family deserves and the kind that they'll be talking about long after the holidays are over.

I used to think you could only get a really great steak at an.

Expensive steakhouse, but Good Ranchers delivers that same quality right to my door. Now I can impress family and guests without dropping 100 bucks every time we eat out.

And here's the deal. If you subscribe to any Good Ranchers box today using code Walsh, you get.

An additional $100 off your first three.

Orders, $40 off your first, 30 bucks.

Off your second, and 30 off of.

Your third with our code and free meat for life when you subscribe. So hit up goodranchers.com this holiday season.

Full of delicious meals.

Again, use code walsh good ranchers.com let's get back to the table. All right. Speaking of Third world countries, Daily Wire reports President Donald Trump issued a direct.

Warning to Nigeria on Saturday, promising withhold aid from the nation and threatening to take further action if the government did not step in and put a stop to the targeted killing of Christians there. Trump made a statement via his Truth Social platform calling on the Nigerian government to stop the Islamic terrorists who were killing Christians and warning if they did.

Not do so quickly, he would.

The United States could go into that.

Now disgraced country, guns a blazing. Trump posted quote, if the Nigerian government.

Continues to allow the killing of Christians.

The USA will immediately stop all aid.

And assistance Nigeria and may very well go into that now disgraced country, guns ablazing, to completely wipe out the Islamic terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities.

I think this might be the first.

Time in American history that a president has used the phrase guns a blazing, especially while actually making a threat of this kind.

Saying, literally, I'm going to go in there, guns a blazing. I think it might be a first. But of course, Trump has a lot.

Of those kinds of records, you know, in the, in, in Guinness. He's got the, the first, the first president to ever say, you know, almost everything he says is a, sets a record of that kind anyway.

I am hereby instructing our department of War to prepare for possible action. If we attack, it'll be fast, vicious and sweet, just like the. That's also a first.

I think it's a first time any president has ever described a potential attack as fast, vicious and sweet.

Just like the terrorist thugs attacked our.

Cherished Christians, warning the Nigerian government better move fast.

So some of the, as always with.

Trump, some of the phrasing is kind of funny, but the, the actual issue that's being dealt with here is not at all funny at all. This is incredibly serious.

And Trump on Air Force One was.

Talking about this and elaborate a little bit more.

[Donald Trump]

Let's play that they're killing record numbers of Christians in Nigeria and they have other countries, very bad also, you know that, that part of the world, very bad. They're killing the Christians and killing them in very large numbers. I'm not going to allow that to happen.

[Matt Walsh]

So Trump is trying to put an.

End to the Christian persecution in Nigeria, which has been going on for a very long time. Islamic militants are slaughtering Christians. Upwards of 50,000 have been killed over the past decade, depending on decade, decade, decade and a half, or so, depending on what numbers you trust. I mean, really, you can't trust any numbers about this.

I mean, we don't, we don't, we.

Don'T actually know how many Christians have been slaughtered in Nigeria. It is many thousands, could be many more than 50,000. So that's how it generally goes with the genocide, is that it's. The people conducting it are not exactly keeping clear, clear record.

So we don't know exactly thousands every year.

We do know that. And this is happening mostly under the radar. I mean, it's not under the radar in Nigeria, but on the, on the.

Quote, unquote, global stage, no one has.

Really paid much attention. And so one of the most important things Trump has done here is draw global attention to it. And, and we'll talk more about this week. Probably tomorrow, we'll go deeper into the persecution of Christians in that country and give you more information about it. So we'll try to keep the conversation going this week.

Now, a lot of people are focused.

On Trump's threat to go in, quote, guns a blazing.

But we should also know by now.

That Trump says stuff like that as a, as a bargaining chip. I mean, we've seen him do this countless times.

I, I would guess we're not really.

Going to move in militarily into Nigeria.

Though, that we could. That's why Trump is so effective, is.

That he makes these dramatic threats.

Often he does not follow through because.

He doesn't need to.

Sometimes he does.

He's willing to. And so that's enough to, to extract.

Concessions often because he'll make these threats.

And you kind of, you know, it's.

Like, well, is he really gonna, he might do that. He's shown a willingness to follow, to.

Follow through, which, if you want your threats to mean anything, then you have to have demonstrated a willingness to actually follow through, which Trump has.

So, you know, we'll, we'll see if.

If that part happens. Cutting off all aid to the country, though, that is something that needs to happen. I mean, that, that should happen anyway.

Why are we giving aid to Nigeria?

Can anyone explain why we're doing that?

I mean, people could explain it.

I'm sure there's all kinds of explanations that we could get, all kinds of official explanations. But.

How does it benefit Americans to.

Give aid to Nigeria?

That, that would be the difficult question to answer. We give, you know, billions of dollars.

We gave a billion dollars last year.

For what? It certainly is not being used to.

Protect the Christians in that country.

That is obvious. So it's not being used for that. So why are we doing it now? A lot of this money is supposed.

To address hunger in the country.

It's supposed to feed people. We, we sent them. Actually, it was just a month ago.

About a month or back in September, a couple months ago, we, we sent, I think it was a $32 million package to Nigeria for nutrition assistance. And we sent 30 million the year before that also, you know, for the same reasons. That was part of a $500 million humanitarian aid package to Sub Saharan Africa.

Mostly for food. And, and that's just part of the.

Aid that we send.

So overall, we've. We've sent Nigeria something like $8 billion.

In the past nine or ten years. And through.

That's all I could. Through a quick Google search, all I.

Could find is how much we've sent thereabouts since 2015. Before that, we were sending money. Before that, how much. And, you know, you could find that out. Just needs a little more investigation.

Billions of dollars is the point.

We. We have sent billions of dollars to Nigeria. We've spent billions of dollars on them. And again, for what?

Well, we've already established there's no way.

You can argue that this benefits America at all. Okay? There, there is no American who has benefited.

There's no American family sitting down for dinner tonight that somehow is benefited by.

The fact that we're spending billions of dollars on Nigeria.

And on top of that, it doesn't even help Nigerians. I mean, after. Just take the last 10 years, you know, almost $10 billion over the last 10 years.

So almost a billion dollars a year.

And that's a lot of money.

Okay? That's a lot of money.

Billions of dollars. And they still can't feed themselves in that country. 20 or 25% of the country is undernourished or malnourished. That's what we're told. And we're told that as a justification for continuing to send them money. But what effect is it having? I mean, even if we all agreed that, oh, yeah, well, we should obviously.

Be spending billions of dollars to make sure that Nigerians have enough food, which I don't agree with that.

Now, if you want.

I'm all about charity. If you want to give of your own free will and volition, if you're someone who says, well, no, we can't take away aid from, from Nigeria because.

That would be cruel.

You know, they won't be able to feed themselves.

Well, no one is stopping you.

You, you are perfectly able to send however much money you want. And if enough merit, if enough Americans really do care about making sure that Nigerians have enough food, well, then they can all get together and you can. There's tons of charities you can give money to.

Go ahead and do that. But even if we were to agree that it's.

That's a good enough reason to send.

Them foreign aid, well, it's not even. It's not doing anything. We're spending billions and billions and billions of dollars. And after, after decades of this, they still can't feed themselves.

And, and of.

Course, because this is a, this, this is the, this is the scam with foreign aid.

The money goes to their government, the same government that has no interest in protecting Christians from being slaughtered. So we funnel billions into the coffers of corrupt, failed third world governments. And again, for what? It's not making Nigeria any less dysfunctional. It's not solving their problems, and much.

More importantly, it's not solving any of our problems.

Has the $8 billion to Nigeria improved America? I mean, can anyone point to, like, a tangible improvement, a tangible positive impact in America that stems from the $8 billion investment that we've made in Nigeria?

Like, can you, can you fill in the blank here? So it's step one, give Nigeria $8.

Billion over the last 10 years.

Step three, the everyday lives of Americans are improved. What is step two? Can you fill in the blank on step two? What, what's happening in step two that would connect those dots?

I don't think anyone can explain that.

Today is the very last day to.

Join Daily Wire plus with our deal of the decade. Join today for under $7 a month, same price you would have paid in 2015, and get access to everything. Catch up on what you've been missing, like two new episodes of our flagship show, Friendly Fire, and powerful new documentaries, including the 1916 Project, USS Cole, Al Qaeda Strike Before 9 11, and Hiding in Plain Sight. And with your annual Daily Wire plus.

Membership, you'll be one of the first.

To see the Pendragon cycle, the Rise of The Merlin, premiering January 22nd. You get all of it and everything coming next for under $7 a month.

But today is the final day of the deal.

Go to dailywire.com subscribe to join today. All right, Kamala Harris certainly can't explain that or anything else. She's been making the rounds quite a bit recently, and here she is on some kind of podcast.

Diary of a CEO is the podcast.

And here she is proposing a disastrously stupid idea.

[Kamala Harris]

Listen, I think we should reduce voting age to 16. I'll tell you why. So Gen Z, they're age about 13 through 27. They've only known the climate crisis. They missed substantial parts of their education because of the pandemic. If they're in high school or college, especially in college, it is very likely that whatever they've chosen as their major for study may not result in an affordable wage. They've coined the term climate anxiety to describe fear of not only being able to buy a home, but that fear will be wiped out by extreme weather. But fear of having children. It is expected that Gen z will have 10 to 12 jobs in their lifetime. They are a larger number than boomers. They're a specific generation of people who are going to impact our nation and the world and I think we must invest in them. But I think that they are rightly impatient with a lot of what is the tradition of leadership right now. And if they were able to vote because they know everything that's happening right now is going to impact them more than anybody older than them for the most part in terms of how these systems work. If they're voting right now at 16 and up, they're going to be talking about the importance of climate. They're going to be talking about the importance of figuring out how AI is going to affect the future of the workforce. They're going to be focused on what are we really doing about affordable housing. And basically in politics, here's the hard truth about this.

[Matt Walsh]

Shut up Kamala, that's enough.

So yeah, we got to lower the.

Voting age to 16 so that gen Z can vote. She says. So nobody tell Kamala that Gen Z is already voting.

The majority of Gen zers are above.

The age of 18. So if your argument is that we need to lower the voting age in order to get Gen Z involved, well.

Good news, they are involved. Whether you think that's good news or not, they are involved.

They're already voting.

Gen Z are between the ages of 13 and 28.

So most of them are voting anyway.

Although if we're going to lower the voting age for their sake, why not lower it?

Yeah, why not go all the way when I Lower it to 13? Why not lower it to 10? Why not lower it to 8? Why not lower it to. Why not?

Why not have infants vote? I mean if, if you start lowering.

The voting age.

There'S no, there's, there is no.

Line that makes sense to draw.

If you lower it beyond 18, then any other line you draw is totally arbitrary and that's by design. Now the 18 cut off makes sense because that's when you're a legal adult.

So that's like, makes sense.

There's a logic to that. Now I think the, as you know, I think the voting age should be higher.

I think 24.

I think the voting age should be.

39 because I'm 39.

Then when I turn 40, the voting age, the voting age should just get higher and higher as I age specifically.

That's another law that I'm proposing.

The voting age is whatever age I.

Am personally.

And Then when I die.

No one's allowed to vote ever again. When I die, that's the end of voting. I'm taking voting with me when I go out.

So I'd propose that law. I don't know that, that one probably.

Has even less of a chance of making it through.

But if we're not going to do that, then I think 25, like 25 is a, is a better threshold. And, and that's also not arbitrary because that is when your brain is, is fully developed, is by the age of 25. I think 18 is, is still way.

Too young for voting in my mind. I mean, yes, you're a legal adult, but you haven't lived as an adult in the world for any length of time. You haven't taken on any adult responsibilities. I mean, I don't know very many 18 year olds who have really have adult responsibilities. And that should be a prerequisite of voting.

But let's put that to the side.

18 at least makes some kind of sense. That's a discernible coherent line to draw. But if you put it down to 16, then there's no reason to stop at 16. And that's the point.

It's like 16.

Well, why not 15? I mean, why not 14?

And the ultimate goal is to abolish.

The voting age entirely. And that's what these people actually want to do. Like don't, we should know, don't put anything past them. There's nothing too extreme for them. And they would, yeah, they would, they would prefer if there was no voting age at all. That's what they actually want.

And why is that? Well, the reason that Kamala gives is that kids have a lot of anxiety and a lot of fear about stuff.

Like climate change, which means that they should vote for some reason.

That's literally her argument. She says, oh, we should. You should be able to vote at 16. Why? Well, because, you know, 16 year olds.

Have a lot of anxiety about the climate.

Okay, so they're afraid and anxious. They, they, they have dysregulated emotions and that's a, that is a qualification for voting. So their anxious emotional state is a reason why they should vote. If anything, wouldn't that be a disqualification? Well, no, not for her, because the.

Real reason she wants to lower the voting age, of course, is that, yeah, kids are emotional and, and, and ignorant and easy to manipulate, which is no insult. That's no slight. I mean, we were all kids once. We were the same way.

Many of us are still that way.

And we're not Kids anymore.

The difference is that for adults, it's. It's shameful to be that way, but.

For kids, it's inevitable. You know, kids are kids. Kids are ignorant in the sense of lacking information.

Whereas you have a lot.

Of adult voters who are ignorant in the sense of. Of, you know, ignoring information or refusing to pursue information. So it's a kind of willful ignorance.

But.

For kids, it's an unwilling ignorance. And there's a reason that Kamala wants more ignorant voters. She wants more. She wants more voters who are ignorant. She wants more voters who have no skin in the game. She wants more voters who don't understand the issues. She wants more voters who are immature. More. More voters who are overly emotional. That's what she wants, and there's a reason she wants it.

All right, Variety had their Power of.

Women award ceremony over the weekend.

Which. What is that?

I don't know. It's.

Well, it's.

It's just more cringe Girl boss feminism. Because we're still doing that. You know, we keep saying that Wokeness.

Is dead, but it's funny, we keep saying Wokeness is dead. Nobody on the left seems to realize that. We on the right are saying Wokeness died. Over on the left, they don't. It. They don't realize that, which tells me that it's not actually dead.

Right.

Because they're the ones who. It's. It's their thing, so they're still doing it. Means it's not dead. And this is kind of a different topic.

I don't want to get too sidetracked, but, you know, I was thinking about this when I saw this clip that a lot of us on the right have claimed that Wokeness is dead. And I think the reports of the demise of Wokeness were very premature. Feminism hasn't gone anywhere.

You know, would anyone say that feminism has died? I wish that it would die. It deserves to die. It deserves to die many painful deaths.

The ideology does. I mean, but it hasn't. And really none of the left's projects are dead. Most.

Most of them aren't.

As we talked about, a communist is.

About to be mayor of New York. It kind of blows my mind that you still have conservatives say Wokeness is dead. The left, the left is on the run. We got them on their heels. Meanwhile, an actual foreign communist is about to be the mayor of New York. You know, they're out marching in the.

Streets with their cringe no Kings movement. Antifa is more active than ever. The leftists are more violent than ever. They're killing us.

I mean, wokeness is not dead.

And I think, I think, I think that's, that's cope among, among conservatives when they say that.

I think that when someone on the right says that, what they mean very.

Specifically is that the trans stuff is dead.

Or if not dead, it has receded.

Significantly, which it has, thank God.

But I think it's cope.

It's self delusion to claim that wokeness.

Across the board is dead.

It's just not. Okay? That's why this, this my, my message here very consistently is that's why we need to be focused on it.

It is not over. Like we have not. We won an election, okay? We won a single election, which is great. I'm glad we did. It's very important. But it's, it's not over. And now you look back at some.

Of the, some of the celebrating that was done and I was, I was.

There was reason to celebrate. We should have celebrated. It is a good thing. But I think that.

A lot of.

Conservatives took that as well.

You know, it's over. Like we don't need to fight the left anymore. Right?

All the talk of the golden age.

Right. The golden age is upon us. Yeah, you get caught up in the moment, you feel good.

And some of that is.

Some of that is understandable.

We all did.

I got caught up in the moment. But no, this is not, this is not like the golden age of conservatism. It just isn't.

It's, it's like, it's not even close. We, we want, we won a presidential election.

That's what happened. Fantastic and truly is fantastic.

But the fight very much continues and we need to realize that.

We need to get our heads back in the game. And I think a lot of us have not had our heads in the game.

So anyway, Wanda Sykes.

Spoke at this event. Not, not the most important, you know.

Public figure at this point, but she did speak at this event and she decided to confess to a crime publicly.

Which I thought was interesting.

[Wanda Sykes]

Listen, I just don't be up, be upfront with you if, when it comes to a position and I look on the paper and they, they, they right there. Or she might be right here and he's up there. I'm hiring a woman. And that's, that's just how I operate. And I'll be honest with if she's a black woman. Off I ain't I. You girl. You got the job, girl. You got the job.

[Matt Walsh]

Okay, first of all, the DOJ should.

Be announcing an investigation into Wanda Sykes, today, she just confessed to a civil liberties, civil rights violation. She just confessed to a crime. I mean, that's what happened there. She confessed to a federal crime. Racial and gender discrimination in hiring is against the law.

The EEOC should be investigating, just as they would if any white man stood up there and said that he gives the edge to white men in hiring. I mean, can you imagine any white man saying that and not being immediately sued into oblivion if not thrown in prison? No, you can't imagine that. So same should apply here. But you also see the game that.

These people play, right? This is the gaslighting.

So here is Wanda Sykes explicitly admitting that she will hire a black woman regardless of her qualifications, admitting that if a woman, especially a black woman, is even less qualified. She said that. She said, well, the man could be up here and maybe the woman's a little down here. I'm still going to choose the woman. So explicit, just coming out and saying, yeah, I'll, I'll take the less qualified person because of their gender and, or race. And she admits this on stage to a, to a cheering crowd. And yet if we then turn around and say that DEI hires are less qualified, then we get called racist, even though they admit it. So, so they say we hire less qualified black women because they're black women. And then we say, oh, so you hire less qualified black women just because they're black women? And they say, what? How. How dare you say that? Well, no, we didn't say that. You said it.

You. You just said it like a second ago.

And we're repeating what you said. You literally just said that that's what you're doing, and we see you doing it, and so we are pointing out that you're doing it.

But that's the game. And of course, you know, and, and.

The result is that now, because of.

This sort of thing, not just because.

Of Wanda Sykes, but this is. She's a small symptom of a larger problem, as we know. And because of that, like, this is why all black women in, in important.

Professional positions are under suspicion.

Basically because these DEI policies have been in place for so long, and leftists.

Like Wanda Sykes and countless others have.

Admitted that they give preference to black women even if they're less qualified. Joe Biden admitted that, famously so. And, you know, black women are not.

The only ones who benefit, but they.

They check multiple DEI boxes, which means that now you have to wonder anytime a black woman is in an important position.

But you have to wonder, did.

They get that job because they really.

Happen to be the most qualified for.

It, or did they get it because they were hired by somebody like Wanda Sykes who will come out and say that she'll give the job to the less qualified person if it's a black woman? So you have to wonder that, were they put there because they checked the demographic boxes or were they put there because they're qualified? Well, that's the result. It's not our fault. Right, I know that.

Me saying that, like, that's going to get clipped.

Matt Walsh says that we should be.

Suspicious of every black woman who's in.

A important professional position. Well, I didn't say we should be. I said that we are. Because that's the situation that you guys have created because you guys have decided.

To put the fact that someone's a black woman above qualifications. And so now every time a black woman is in any kind of professional.

Position, we have to like, how did she get that job? And, and no, we don't do that with white men. So we never have to be suspicious.

Of white men in that way in any position.

Now, not.

There are plenty of white men who can be incompetent, who can be not.

Good at their jobs, but no white.

Man is going to be hired because he's a white man. So we never have to worry about that.

Any white man in any position, we never have to go, well, did he.

Only get that job because he's a white man?

Never have to wonder that, because that definitely is not the case. In fact, in most jobs, you look at it now and you go, well, he, he got that even though he's.

A white man, that we know he's.

He's. He came up at a system that was biased against him. We have actual affirmative action policies up till recently that were explicitly biased against him.

And he still got into this position.

So that's a mark in his favor.

That's all. That's all the more reason to think that he must be, like, super qualified. But you look at a black woman, you go, well, yeah, it could be.

Very qualified, perfectly possible, but also could just be there because she's a black woman.

Either one of those scenarios are possible and, and we don't know which one. You know, this, this is the obvious.

This is the point that Charlie Kirk.

Made, you know, not, not all long ago. And it got a lot. Gotten a lot of trouble with the left, made this point about, about black airline pilots. And of course, you had a bunch.

Of leftists and even some people, even.

Even some conservatives, of course, or say.

Well, this is, that's, that's racist.

That's going too far. No, this is the point. When you, when you start, when you start elevating people based solely on their race or their gender or the demographics. And then now we don't know.

Are you saying that every black pilot is unqualified?

No, of course not. There's plenty of qualified ones. But I don't know which is which.

How are we supposed to know? And that's the, that's the whole point. Okay? Also, this. Finally, Daily Wire reports, liberal host Kyle.

Kalinske mocked Erica Kirk, the widow of assassinated conservant Charlie Kirk, in a widely ridiculed expost on Friday night. And the article goes on about all the backlash he got. Well, well deserved. But we'll just put, rather than reading it, we'll just put the tweet up on the screen, which I'd rather not do to give this guy any more of the attention that he craves.

But so you can see the, the.

Tweet is, is a, you know, an AI, Fake image of a, one of these Halloween costume memes, and it says fake grieving widow grifter costume includes fake teardrops, skin tight black leather morning pants, and then it's Erica Kirk holding a pile of money. So not exactly a subtle joke there.

You know, th. This is what we're up against now. Now this guy in particular, this Kyle.

Kalinsky, he's, he's, he's not relevant. Nobody cares about him. You know, this is one of these guys, one of these, like, YouTubers. He's been on YouTube for like 17 years.

He's been on YouTube since it was invented.

Okay?

He's one of the guys. He, he, he opened up a YouTube.

Account like five days after they, after they, after the site came into existence.

And he's got 2 million subs, so.

And I know 2 million sounds impressive, but, you know, it's, that's our first 17 years.

So this guy, this guy's growth has stalled out.

Stalled out a long time ago. I think this is one of these guys that was like vaguely sort of relevant briefly about 12 years ago, back when Reddit atheists were back. Back in that. Back in that. Yeah, he's just like your classic Reddit atheist guy.

And so back in that, like, window.

Of about 14 months when Reddit atheists were relevant, if they ever were back in 2012 or 2013 or something.

So that was his time of relevance.

And he's just kind of been. But he's just been existing ever since then.

Growth has stalled out.

Nobody cares about this guy. Nobody talks about him, nobody likes him. He has zero influence whatsoever. And you find this like there are.

These, these, some of these so called.

Influencers and YouTubers who, yeah, they have.

They have millions of followers. They have no influence at all. Like no one listens to them. They are not impacting the culture in any way whatsoever. And yet some of them, because they've.

Been around for so long, they've got millions.

And so now what he's trying to do is re. Skindle, rekindle the, the spark by you.

Know, trying to get some growth going again with his stalled out channel and stalled out brand, non existent brand.

And he's trying to do it by trolling a grieving widow.

That, that's his plan, right?

That's it, that's his, that's his growth.

Plan for this quarter is to troll a grieving widow.

Which really means that I shouldn't even.

Be acknowledging it and giving this sad sack of any attention that he's begging for.

But I am going to give it.

Some attention for a brief minute because.

You know, you should know that this.

Is what we're up against.

These are people who will celebrate your.

Death and then laugh in the face of your mourning loved ones. They will piss on your grave and spit on your grieving spouse. These are people who have no honor.

Okay? A pathetic like little rat faced scumbag.

Like this, no honor at all. This is not a man of honor. This is not a man of integrity. There's none of that to speak of. This is not a man at all. And, but there's a lot of them and this is what we're up against. And this is why I have so obsessively tried to redirect everyone's focus back.

To the fight, back to the left.

To the people who really and truly want you dead. This is what we need to be thinking about and talking about and, and rallying against. And the treatment of Erica Kirk should be very enlightening. If you needed to be enlightened anymore on this point, then this should do it for you. Because this woman Erica has not done anything like the way that she is.

On the left, on social media.

She is reviled. I mean they despise her.

It is go into the fever swamps.

Of blue sky sometime. I don't really recommend it, but if you really, again, if you really want.

To see, if you want to see it.

And so maybe I do recommend it.

Just to get everyone, everyone focused again on what matters.

Go type her name In.

It's not even like. Well, there's a couple of posts here.

And there of trolls.

It's like nothing but no one will.

Say anything in her defense.

Nothing but seething contempt and mockery for this woman who has not done anything to any of these people. What has she done that anyone finds so offensive? She's mourned the loss of her husband and she's tried to carry on his legacy. She's in a, to put it mildly, very difficult position where your husband was shot in the throat and killed. You've got two young children. He was a man. He was a very important man.

He was a great man who had this massive, important organization.

And so you've got your family and your kids, and you have his legacy and you have the country looking at you, and all of this was thrust on you all at once. Not. Not, you know, not because of anything you did or anything.

Like, you.

You were just living your life, and you find yourself thrown into this position.

And he's scum. These absolute dirt. I mean, these people are dirt. They really are.

They just.

I'm sorry. Now, it's like. We try not to be dehumanizing, but you're barely a human being if this.

If this is how you treat a grieving widow.

You're barely human. I mean, you're human only in the biological sense. You have no humanity. You have no soul.

You forfeited your soul.

You're certainly not a man. You're.

You're just this pathetic eunuch, this little.

Disgusting, slimy little worm. That's.

That's all you are. It's because that's what you've chosen to. To be.

That's who you've made yourself. And. And if you were to ask them how they justify.

Because even people like Kyle Kalinsky, even in his.

In his own brain, to the extent that he has one, he probably feels.

You know, he feels. Still.

Still feels the need justify doing that, mocking a widow.

Because even somebody like that, you know, even though. Even though they're, like, cartoonishly evil, these people are just. They're cartoons.

They're cartoon villains.

But even for these cartoonishly evil people, they still feel the need to justify in their own heads because. Because they can't. Like, no one can look at themselves.

In the mirror and say, yes, I'm an evil person.

I'm just an evil piece of. That's all. I like no one. Even Kyle Kalinsky, that's what he is. But he would never be able to tell himself that. And so he finds a way to justify it and the way that they.

Would justify it and say, well, have you seen the way she's reacted, the way she's reacting? Oh, reacting. What, by crying because her husband was shot? What.

What. What's the correct way to.

To react?

You want to give us the. Give us the handbook. Go ahead. Do you have the handbook? You have the handbook for grieving spouses? Like, have you ever experienced anything even. Like a. Even.

Even a. Even a fraction of what she's going through and experiencing?

Have you ever had that in your pathetic, useless life? Have you ever had to experience anything like that? Oh, no, you haven't. And yet you can sit there on.

Your YouTube channel, sit there back on.

On Twitter or on Blue sky, just.

You know, on your phone, typing, I don't.

This is not the. I wouldn't react this way.

You have no idea what you're talking about. You don't know anything. And anyway, that's got nothing. It doesn't matter.

It. It.

You and I both know it doesn't matter what Erica did or what she said, doesn't matter how she reacted, even though there's absolutely nothing wrong with how she's reacted to any of this. She's a grieving widow. She's.

It's all. But it. It doesn't matter. It makes no difference. You would be treating her the exact.

Same way, and you know it. You would be treating her the exact same way because you're people of no honor. You are dishonorable, disgusting, low, slimy, parasitic worms, and this is how you treat people. And we all know that there. There is, you know, in. In life, there are like the bare minimum. There's like this bare minimum bar of human decency.

And don't ridicule a grieving widow is. That's like the bar, okay?

That.

That's. That. That's like as low as the bar can get. And if you can't clear that bar.

Then again, you're just.

You're.

You're a person of no honor.

So.

And this is them. And. And never forget that if you're a conservative, that this is how they feel about you. And this reality, it never escapes my.

Never.

Doesn't escape me. I mean, this is. This. This is very much at the forefront of my mind. And so especially for anyone out there, people have. There's a lot of, as I mentioned at the top, I've. I have this. All this infighting going on, and a lot of people are catching arrows, and I'm getting a.

Them from a lot of different sides. And some of the people who are.

Flinging those arrows at me are, have said, have accused me of, you know, acting. Be being a little different over the last couple of months, being maybe more extreme, a little angrier, less forgiving in my language, all that sort of thing. And, yeah, guilty as charged. Guilty as charged. Because they killed Charlie and they celebrated it. And I have not forgotten that. And I'm not ever going to forget it. And the other thing that I won't forget is that I know that if it happened to me, they would do the exact same thing. They would. They would be laughing in my wife's face with glee.

And we all know that, right?

If it happened to me, that's how they would react. We all know that. And that realization makes things very clear for me, who the enemy is. It could not be clearer. And it should be clear to all of us.

All right, we're going to wrap it there for today.

We'll get back to the daily cancellations tomorrow. I know I've skipped out of them on the last. This was kind of. It's like an unofficial cancellation, but we won't. We won't call it. So we'll get back to that tomorrow.

Until then, thanks for listening.

Thanks for watching. Have a great day. Talk to you tomorrow. Godspeed.

[John Bickley]

Hey, there. I'm Daily Wire executive editor John Bickley.

[Kamala Harris]

And I'm Georgia Howe, and we're the hosts of Morning Wire.

[Matt Walsh]

We bring you all the news you need to know in 15 minutes or less.

[Kamala Harris]

Watch and listen to Morning Wire seven days a week, everywhere you get your podcasts.

[Matt Walsh]

Let's be honest. If you're a gun owner and you're.

Still shooting unsuppressed, you're messing up. You've got a great gun, you've got decent aim, but you're still out there making your range days loud when they don't need to be. A suppressor from Silencer Shop fixes that.

Less noise, less recoil.

No more walking away from the range with your ears ringing.

Silencer Shop takes your gun from good.

To greater than you ever imagined and makes it easy. Silencer Shop has the largest selection of suppressors in the country. Approvals are coming in at record speeds, and their expert team can help you with anything you need.

No guesswork, no bureaucratic headaches, just better.

Range days and hunting trips. And when it comes to the Second Amendment, Silencer Shop puts their money where their mouth is, supporting your rights more than just about anyone else.

Go to silencershop.

Com Walsh today and start shooting smarter, quieter and better.

That's silencershop. Com. Walsh. Because if you're serious about freedom, you ought to shoot like it Silencer Shop.

Because your rights and your ears are worth protecting.