Ep. 1704 - The Strange Tradition That The Left Is Using To Undermine Republicans

Summary

---

Episode Overview

Title: Ep. 1704 - The Strange Tradition That The Left Is Using To Undermine Republicans
Date: December 9, 2025
Host: Matt Walsh (The Daily Wire)

In this episode, Matt Walsh explores deep-rooted political traditions that, he argues, are being used to undermine Republican effectiveness in Congress, with a spotlight on the "blue slip" tradition and its partisan entrenchment. Beyond procedural politics, Walsh critiques Republican inertia, skewers recent political advertising (notably Jasmine Crockett's Senate campaign launch), and laments the cultural shallowness he sees infecting both politics and advertising. Walsh wraps with reflections on Santa Claus and modern parenting, all delivered in his characteristic sardonic tone.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Republican Inaction & the Mystery of Ineffectiveness

• Opening Theme: Republicans have held power for a year in Congress but "accomplished almost nothing" ([00:00]).
• Walsh seeks to answer why elected Republicans, once in power, appear paralyzed or unwilling to fulfill campaign promises.

---

2. The Revolting "Conservative" Judiciary & The Blue Slip Tradition

• Highlight: At least "four" Reagan-appointed federal judges are openly criticizing Trump and adopting anti-GOP positions ([00:59]).
• Quotes Judges: “Our rule of law and our democracy will be doomed unless Trump is stopped.” - Judge Mark Wolf ([01:38]).
• Walsh's Thesis: The real reason for the judiciary's betrayal isn't Trump or Reagan's darkness, but a little-known tradition—the blue slip process ([03:03]).

What is the Blue Slip?:

• Began in early 1900s to let home-state senators block federal judicial and U.S. attorney nominees ([05:28]).
• By the 1960s, mainly used by southern segregationists to block pro-civil rights judges ([06:05]).
• Now, a single senator can veto a nominee from their state, regardless of presidential electoral mandate ([06:27]).
• Critique: "There's no law, there's no article in the Constitution about the blue slip process. It's totally arbitrary." ([07:18])

Contextual Example:

• Reagan had to get Ted Kennedy and John Kerry's blue slips to appoint judges in Massachusetts, leading to liberal appointees ([07:43]).
• Trump complains, “If I put up George Washington and Abraham Lincoln... Democrat senators... will not approve them.” ([04:33])

GOP Perpetuates Its Own Obstacle:

• Republicans suspended blue slips for circuit judges (e.g., Eric Miller in 2019), but inexplicably retained it for district judges and U.S. attorneys ([08:45]).
• "The only people that you can get by are Democrats, because they will put a hold on it." – Trump ([04:38])
• Matt ridicules Sen. Chuck Grassley’s defense of the status quo as “nonsense.” He mocks Grassley’s logic that because Republicans used blue slips to block Biden nominees, fairness requires allowing Democrats to do the same to Republicans. ([10:50])

Memorable Quote:

• “Only a political movement that’s bent on its own suicide — as well as the suicide of the entire country — would push total nonsense like this.” ([12:11])

---

3. Republican Accomplishments (Or Lack Thereof)

Walsh lists the GOP’s modest legislative record since taking control:

• Funded ICE and border security
• Passed minor tax cuts and welfare changes
• Enacted the "Lake and Riley Act" on detaining criminal illegal aliens ([13:36])
• But: No progress on national gender-care bans, national voter ID, illegal alien driver’s licenses, Obamacare repeal, or cost-of-living reforms ([13:54])

Quote:

• “They haven’t done anything else. And it’s been a year.” ([14:53])

---

4. GOP's Tone-Deaf Outreach & Weakness in Messaging

John Curtis Example:

• Senator John Curtis (Utah) appears on CNN, focuses on “making immigrants feel more welcome” ([15:13]).
• Matt lambasts this, asserting: “We are not the ones who should be spending our time fretting about foreigners... The obligation is on them.” ([16:10])

Quote:

• “No Republican politician will ever say that.” ([17:07])

---

5. Jasmine Crockett’s Senate Campaign Ad — A Masterclass in Bad Messaging

Ad Analysis:

• Jasmine Crockett’s first ad is just Trump calling her “low IQ” and “stupid” — and that’s it ([22:15]).
• Walsh: “That’s her opening argument to be in the Senate is that the president thinks she’s stupid. That’s it.” ([23:15])

Why It’s “The Worst Ad Ever”:

• The ad lacks a rebuttal or evidence to dispel the criticism; Walsh jokes he agrees with every word ([22:15-25:00]).
• “It’s like a highlight video of an athlete where... it just ends. That’s it. That’s the end of it.” ([27:00])

Cultural Trend:

• Walsh argues Crockett, and many contemporary politicians, only want “attention” and to be “influencers,” not actually to achieve legislative results ([33:01]).
• Laments: “We are rapidly approaching a point where that’s all we have are people like that.” ([35:41])

Memorable Moment:

• Crockett’s campaign launch includes a “bad rap song” that Walsh harshly critiques for failing even basic rhyme ([29:32-32:08]).

---

6. The AI War on Art: McDonald’s AI-Generated Christmas Ad

• McDonald’s releases a fully AI-generated Christmas commercial ([38:09]).
• Walsh declares it soulless: “…witless, charmless, lifeless, artless. It sucks. It’s awful. I hate it.” ([42:15])
• He critiques modern marketing generally: “No one in marketing has any idea what they’re doing… they’re just scam artists.” ([46:11])
• Critique of Message: Commercial’s “It’s the most terrible time of the year” angle is anti-Christmas, anti-Christian, and poor marketing ([44:08])

Quote:

• “Nobody hates Christmas. Who do you think — no one hates Christmas. I hate everything. I don’t hate Christmas.” ([44:08])

---

7. Asylum, Immigration, and Violent Crime

Disturbing Story:

• UK case: Two Afghan “asylum seekers,” age 15, convicted of raping a 15-year-old girl ([50:49]).
• Walsh uses this to demand the West abolish asylum, calling it a “scam” that imports “the worst, most degenerate filth” ([53:26]).

Quote:

• “They’re claiming asylum not from persecution, not from oppression, but from their own dysfunction.” ([54:48])

• “No, I don't [have sympathy for the plight of foreigners]. I have sympathy for my own people and my own country.” ([55:31])

• Extended analogy: Compares mass asylum requests to a stranger barging into one's home demanding food; asks why Western states must bear the entire burden ([59:09-62:44]).

---

8. Annual Santa Debate — Is Telling Kids About Santa “Lying”?

• Walsh pushes back on claims that “doing Santa” with your kids is a breach of parental trust ([65:12]).
• Defense: Young children live in a "fantastical" reality — magic, monsters, Santa — so it's not "lying," it's "playing a game" ([69:19]).
• Children naturally age out of Santa belief; it’s part of growing up.
• Walsh’s personal anecdote: Upon learning Santa isn’t real, his kids responded, “Yeah, dad, we know” ([70:25]).

Memorable Quote:

• “Going out of your way to kill this kind of magical thinking on a five year old is ridiculous to me. Let them live in that world, they’re children. Why take it from them?” ([69:12])

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On the blue slip:

  • “It’s just made up, and it’s long outlived any usefulness that it might have had.” ([07:18])

• On Chuck Grassley:

  • “He’s permanently posting mid-aneurysm, it seems.” ([09:55])

• On Jasmine Crockett’s campaign:

  • “Her whole pitch for why she should be in the Senate is that Trump doesn’t like her.” ([29:09])

• On AI commercials:

  • “If you gave me the same AI program that McDonald’s used, I could create this exact thing.” ([40:37])

• On immigration:

  • “Why is it our job, why is it the job of the west to provide asylum to the misfits and outcasts from other countries?” ([56:47])

• On Santa:

  • “Your four year old is not watching a cartoon show. Your four year old is watching, like, the real-life adventures live… Paw Patrol is cops.” ([66:07])

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• [00:59] – The blue slip tradition and Reagan appointees’ anti-Trump revolt
• [05:28] – How the blue slip process works and its historical use
• [10:50] – Chuck Grassley’s defense and Walsh’s critique
• [13:54] – GOP’s limited legislative achievements in 2025
• [15:13] – John Curtis on CNN and Walsh’s rebuttal of GOP outreach
• [22:15] – Jasmine Crockett’s Senate campaign ad and Walsh’s analysis
• [29:32] – Crockett’s campaign rap and criticism of “influencer politicians”
• [38:09] – McDonald’s AI Christmas ad: A new low in advertising
• [50:49] – Afghan asylum-seeker rape case and asylum as a “scam”
• [65:12] – Santa Claus, children, and the myth of “lying” to kids
• [70:25] – “Growing out” of Santa and family anecdotes

---

Episode Tone

Matt Walsh's tone is biting, acerbic, and unfiltered, interspersed with sardonic humor (“He’s permanently posting mid-aneurysm, it seems”), exasperation at GOP ineffectiveness and cultural decay, and at times, deeply personal when discussing family and parental values. He frequently addresses the audience directly, employing analogies and personal anecdote to stress his cultural critiques.

---

This summary covers the episode’s primary content and rhetorical highlights while omitting advertisements and standard podcast outros.

Transcript

[A]

Today. MATT WALSH show It's clear that Republicans in Congress have accomplished almost nothing. A year in power and very little to show for it. But why? Why can't or won't the people we elect ever do anything with the power we give them? I'll give some possible answers today. Also, Jasmine Crockett launches her Senate bid with what may be, despite stiff competition, the worst political ad of all time. And speaking of terrible ads, McDonald's has just released a fully AI generated Christmas ad. It's even worse than I expected. As we approach Christmas, I'll answer the age old question, what should a parent do about Santa? All of that and more today on the MATT walsh.

Here's a mystery that, depending on who you ask, has a couple of very different explanations. Why are so many allegedly conservative federal judges now openly revolting against the Trump administration? Why are these judges discarding any pretense of impartiality, which is why we have judges in the first place, in order to moonlight as Rachel Maddow impersonators and give lengthy interviews to left wing media in which they bash Donald Trump? Specifically, why are so many judges who were appointed by Ronald Reagan, at least four of them by my count, publicly attacking the president and his administration? Now, to give just, just one example of of this, Massachusetts District Judge Mark Wolf, who was appointed by Reagan 40 years ago and retired in November, stated this week that, quote, our rule of law and our democracy will be doomed unless Trump is stopped. Other Reagan appointees have lashed out at Trump's efforts to end birthright citizenship as well as his pardons of January 6th defendants. It's the usual hysterics and talking points that we're, you know, all familiar with. But it's coming from judges who are supposed to be neutral. So where is this insurgency from the conservative judiciary coming from exactly? Well, if you ask Democrats, the reason for this phenomenon, of course, is that Donald Trump is orange Hitler and even his party can't stand him anymore. He's so evil that even judges, even judges can't be expected to, you know, act like adults anymore. If you ask Republicans, especially Trump supporters, many of them will point out correctly that Ronald Reagan wasn't as conservative as we often give him credit for. He did, after all, grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens, a move that permanently destroyed the state of California and many others and the country. So maybe Reagan appointed leftist judges because at some level he harbored sympathies for their ideology. But the actual reason for this revolt by the allegedly conservative judges is none of the above, really Although outside of a small number of people, including the law professor, Margo Cleveland, nobody really has pointed this out. And the truth is that, indeed, many of these conservative judges are not actually conservative at all. That's true. But at the same time, in many cases, Reagan's hands were tied. In many cases, the judges were selected because of something called the blue slip process, which removes a huge amount of authority from the democratically elected president. Now, this is a process that's worth talking about in some detail, and most Americans have no idea what it is, have no idea what a blue slip is or why it's relevant.

So, just from a historical perspective, it's interesting enough, but it's also extremely important to learn about it for practical reasons as well. The blue slip process doesn't simply explain why so many Reagan judges are attacking Trump. The continued existence of this ridiculous process also helps to explain why Republicans are completely failing to accomplish anything in Congress at the moment. If you want to understand why the GOP has a majority of both houses of Congress, but hasn't been productive, hardly at all, then you need to know about this now. For his part, the President clearly understands the implications. On Monday, Trump once again weighed in on blue slips, as he's been doing for several weeks now. Listen.

U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey, after the courts disqualified her. Do you have any comment on that?

[B]

Well, she's not disqualified. You've got a blue slip thing. That's horrible. It's a horrible thing. It makes it impossible to appoint a judge or a U.S. attorney, and it's a shame. And the Republicans should be ashamed of themselves that they allow this to go on, because I can't appoint a U.S. attorney that's not a Democrat because they put a block on it. So if you appoint in Virginia or in New Jersey or In California, a U.S. attorney or a judge, I mean, the judge situation is ridiculous. The only people that you can get by are Democrats, because they will put a hold on it. If I put up George Washington and Abraham Lincoln to be US Attorney in New Jersey or to be US Attorney in Virginia, we have Democrat senators. They will not approve them.

[A]

Okay, so here's how the blue slip process works and why Trump is furious with congressional Republicans over it. And. And rightly so. Starting around the 1900s, if the white House wanted to nominate a federal judge or a U.S. attorney, the Senate Judiciary Committee would send a blue slip to the two senators from that nominee's home state for approval. And yes, it's literally a blue slip. It looks something like this. Hence, the name blue slip. Now, if either of the senator disapproved, which they indicated by not returning the blue slip or by writing nasty words on it, then the nominee was in a lot of trouble and he'd probably never become a judge or a U.S. attorney. The Senate committee would generally recommend that the full Senate vote against the nomination. So this was a very powerful tool because it meant that in the end, just one or two senators out of 100 could tank a candidate's nomination to be a judge if those senators were from the nominee's home state. Now, back in the early 20th century, the process made some degree of sense because the home state senator might have some useful and unique knowledge about the nominee that nobody else knew. And this was, after all, an era before the Internet. Information about individual nominees was often hard to come by, especially if you didn't live in the area where this nominee was. By the 1960s or so, the blue slip began serving a very different purpose. So it was primarily a way for segregationist senators in the south to tank the nominations of federal judges who might enforce civil rights laws and integration. A single negative run return blue slip would completely sink a nomination and prevent any further action in the Senate. So in this time period, the blue slip process basically gave individual senators a veto power over any nomination. And then from the 1970s to today, the blue slip process underwent more changes depending on which party controlled the Senate. And in general, the blue slip has remained extremely important in the confirmation process. If your home senators don't like you, then you're in a lot of trouble. So this is how we, we ended up with Reagan appointed judges like Mark Wolf in Massachusetts. It's not that Reagan liked Mark Wolfe. The blue slip process dictated that if Reagan wanted to appoint a federal judge in Massachusetts, then he had to get the approval of John Kerry and Ted Kennedy. So he had to appoint a liberal, basically because those two guys had unofficial veto power and Reagan's hand was forced by a very old, very dumb Senate tradition. And it's important to keep in mind as I go through this, because you might be wondering this. There's no law, there's no article in the Constitution about the blue slip process. It's totally arbitrary. It's completely made up. It doesn't have any basis in anything, not even in any, like, ancient legal traditions or anything like that. It's just made up, and it's long outlived any usefulness that it might have had. At one point, a hundred years ago, during the first Trump administration, Republican senators appeared to realize this and therefore, In February of 2019, history was made. For the first time in American history, a federal judge, Eric Miller, was appointed to the ninth Circuit Court of Appeals without the support of either of his home state senators. In Washington State, Republicans confirmed Eric Miller even though the Democrat senators failed to return their blue slips. And that should have been the moment where the blue slip process died forever, never to return. Instead, Republicans have kept the blue slip process for some reason alive for district judges as well as for US Attorneys. They only abandoned the process for circuit court judges. As a result, as you may have heard, Trump's nominee for U.S. attorney in New Jersey, U.S. attorney Alina Haba, has just had to resign. She wasn't getting any support from her Democrat home state senators, Cory Booker and Andy Kim, for obvious reasons. So Republicans, rather than hold a vote on her candidacy, followed the blue slip tradition and just allowed her nomination to die. This has become a major problem for Trump appointees. From Nevada to California to Virginia, Democrats are using this arcane, ludicrous, arbitrary, useless blue slip tradition to derail the agenda of the Democratically elected president. And Republicans are just going along with it, even though they don't have to. Here's a post from Chuck Grassley, the so called Dean of the Senate, just a few weeks ago, and I'm going to read this as best I can, even though for reasons that remain unclear, Chuck Grassley is incapable of writing sentences in coherent English. He's permanently posting mid aneurysm, it seems. So we'll try to work our way through this. But here's what he wrote. Quote, the 100-year-old blue slip allows home state senators to have input on U.S. attorneys and District court judges. In Biden admin, Republicans kept. Wait, hold on. Oh, there's no period there. In Biden admin Republicans kept 30 liberals off bench that Prez Trump can now fill with conservatives.

Close quote.

In other words, Grassley is saying that we should tolerate the fact that Democrats are using the blue slip process to block Trump's nominees right now and sabotage his agenda. Because during the Biden administration, Republicans used the blue process to block Democrats. This is an argument that if Grassley had made it back in, I don't know, 1995 or so, if he had made it back in 1935 when he first, when he was first elected, it may have been somewhat persuasive. But we are now well past the point where Democrats should be afforded any kind of free political victory. Out of a sense of fairness or tradition. Democrats have become a party that openly celebrates the criminal prosecution and murder of their political opponents. They made it abundantly clear throughout the last four years that they're willing to defile any rule or tradition, including the rule of law, which our entire country depends upon, in order to destroy the Republican Party. So it's laughable to suggest that if Democrats take over Congress, they're going to respect a blue slip from Republican senators. But that's what Chuck Grassley, Congressional Republicans are suggesting. They're saying we should keep, you know, playing fair long after our opponents have decided that victory is all that matters.

Only a political movement that's bent on its own suicide as well as the suicide of the entire country would push total nonsense like this. And, and Donald Trump appears to recognize that fact, which is why he was caught on a hot mic a couple of days ago expressing his frustration with Congressional Republicans as well as the fact that none of his nominees are getting confirmed. Listen.

[B]

Hey, Jeff.

You know, I cannot appoint anybody.

[C]

Huh?

[B]

I can't appoint anybody.

[A]

Everybody.

[B]

I'm appointed. The time has expired and then they're in the fall.

[A]

And then.

Now you can understand the frustration because in addition to not getting his nominees confirmed, he's not getting anything else through Congress either. After nearly a year in power, it's hard to escape the conclusion the Republicans have failed to achieve anything of consequence. Despite controlling both the House and the Senate, they have monumentally failed to capitalize on their mandate. All the momentum they had just a few months ago is basically gone now. Yes, Republicans in Congress did successfully fund ICE and border security. They cut some taxes, they tightened some welfare requirements, and those were the main achievements of the so called big beautiful bill. They did pass the Lake and Riley act, which makes it easier to imprison illegal aliens without bail when they commit serious crimes, so that they don't, you know, say, murder innocent women on college campuses or drive drunk and wipe out entire families. And those are a handful of meaningful accomplishments, but that's about it. They haven't done anything else. And it's been a year.

Republicans, you know, they have not copied the Doge cuts or reduced the size of the federal government in a significant or meaningful way. In fact, they've pledged to rehire the federal bureaucrats who were terminated during the shutdown. Additionally, the Republican controlled Congress has failed to pass any kind of national ban on child mutilation in the name of gender affirming care, even though the White House issued an executive order to that effect. Republicans have failed to implement national voter ID laws to secure future elections and prevent illegal aliens from voting. They fail to do anything about the hordes of illegal aliens who are allowed to obtain commercial driver's license light licenses in this country. They haven't gotten rid of Obamacare, which has made health insurance far more expensive and considerably worse for almost everyone. They haven't passed any bills that might lower the cost of living, including proposed legislation that would eliminate red tape affecting energy and construction projects, cap interest payments on certain loans, and so on a small list of what they have not done, they haven't achieved much.

So what have they been doing? Well, they've been going out of their way to appeal to audiences who despise them and everything the conservative movement represents. And on that note, here's Republican Senator John Curtis of Utah on CNN a couple days ago. Watch this.

[C]

Right?

[A]

And the best thing I can do is set my example. And I think all of us need to wake up every morning, look in the mirror and say, what are we doing? What am I doing specifically today to make this country a better country, to make all of our immigrants feel more welcome. That's what we've always had. And I think if more of us would do that, it would matter less what individuals said, Right? But as you know, he's not just an individual, he's the president of the United States calling an entire community garbage.

Notice how even though he's giving the CNN anchor exactly what she wants, she still berates him. She's still not satisfied with his answer. And why would she be? She recognizes weakness when she sees it, and so does the rest of the left. They'll take full advantage of anyone who just wants to be liked. And as for John Curtis, he's completely inverted the entire issue. No, John, see, you have it backwards. We are not the ones who should be spending our time fretting about foreigners. We aren't the ones who have an obligation to those people. It's not our job to cater to them or make them feel welcomed or make them feel included. No, what should happen is every immigrant should wake up every morning and ask themselves what they can do to show their gratitude to this country and its people. Okay? They are the ones who should be asking themselves what they can do to contribute to our country and help and serve our people. The obligation is on them. The problem is not that Americans lack a welcoming spirit. We, we are more welcoming and more generous than anyone else in the world. It's not even close. Most other countries don't even pretend to care about the plight of foreigners. We are welcoming. We're too welcoming. We're too nice. So the problem is that immigrants who come here often lack any semblance of gratitude or humility, nor do they recognize any duty to this country or its native citizens. They come here with a list of demands, and even when those demands are met, which they shouldn't be, they don't even say thank you. So that's the problem. But no Republican politician will ever say that.

So instead we get lots of platitudes and lots of inaction. We get elderly Republicans defending blue slips and Senate traditions as the leadership of the Democrat Party openly plots our destruction.

These people don't care about the unwritten rules of the Senate or or whatever. They want one thing and one thing only, which is the power the Republicans are currently squandering. Now let's get to our five headlines.

For the past three weeks, you've heard me talk about our sponsor, Pure Talks Unlimited for Life Promotion. And this promotion was so successful they're willing to extend it one final week. So now through December 14th, get unlimited talk, unlimited text and unlimited Data with a 30 gig hotspot on their 5G network for just 29.95amonth for life. This Pure Talk's best plan normally $65 a month, now just 29.95amonth. That's 50% off each month for life permanently. But this offer absolutely ends on December 14th. So go to PureTalk.com Walsh for PureTalk's best unlimited plan for just 29.95amonth for life. Make Switch day in as little as 10 minutes. Bring your phone, keep your number. Start saving again. That's PureTalk.com Walsh to switch to my wireless company, PureTalk. Taxes and fees not included. Some restrictions apply. See PureTalk.com for details. People often pick up protein bars assuming that they're making a quick and healthy decision. But if you've ever taken the time to actually read the label, you were probably surprised to see how much sugar is in those bars. Finding a protein bar that tastes good and is made with quality ingredients might feel like a more daunting task than actually working out. So let me save you the time and energy and tell you about Equip Foods Prime Bar Prime Bar is the first ever grass fed beef protein bar. Prime Bar is made with over with only 11 clean ingredients including collagen, beef, tallow and colostrum. It's naturally sweetened with dates and honey and gives you 20 grams of protein without any guilt at all. I've tried a lot of protein bars in the market and none of them taste like real Food, they taste artificial, they taste kind of strange. But Prime Bar actually tastes like real food, and it's good. If you want to try the cleanest protein bar in the market that already sold out Once, go to equipfoods.com Matt Walsh and use code Matt Walsh at checkout to get 25% off one time purchases or 40% off your first subscription order for a limited time. That's Equip Foods.com Matt Walsh and use code Matt Walsh at checkout. All right, the Republicans being ineffectual, useless blobs has really upset me as usual, and I need to calm down a bit. So let's check in. Let's check in on the fish cam just so we can all. Just so we can all feel better. Look at that.

The fish cam is looking all festive.

I like how that's the only Christmas decorations I have in this whole studio. It's just the fish with a Christmas hat. And what's. What does he have on his tail fin there? Is that a. What is that supposed to be?

A bow? What is it.

A scarf? Okay. All right. Why would his scarf be there? Why would the fish's scarf be, you know, at his ass? Is that where you wear a scarf? What do you think he would. What do you use a scarf for? The scarf should be around his. He doesn't have a neck, but it should be, you know, it should be around where the gills are.

[C]

Are.

[A]

Or is it we don't put the scarf around the gills because then he would suffocate? Is that the idea?

We got to figure that out. But anyway, so I wanted to just look at the fish and relax, but now I'm confused.

He's got a scarf hanging off his ass, and I don't understand why.

Anyway, that didn't work out. Jasmine Crockett has just filed to run for Senate. And I gotta say, here's some good news. Here's some real good news. She put out her first Senate campaign ad. And I never thought I would say this, honest to God. And you probably never would have imagined hearing me say this, but I agree with every word of this ad. She put out this ad. It's a Jasmine Crockett ad. I agree with every word. I cannot complain about a single thing. Every single. I gotta say, it's like 30 seconds long. And the whole thing, I agree with. Never in a million years did I think that I'd ever be able to say that. But here we are. I think Jasmine Crockett has proved that it's still Possible to reach across the aisle and find common ground, which I really respect and I find incredibly inspirational. Let's watch it.

[B]

How about this new one? They have their new star, Crockett. How about, she's the new star of the Democrat Party, Jasmine Crockett. They're in big trouble. But you have this woman, Crockett. She's a very low IQ person. I watched her speak the other day. She's definitely a low IQ person. Crockett. Oh, man. Oh, man. She's a very low IQ person.

Somebody said the other day, she's one of the leaders of the party. I said, you gotta be kidding.

Now they're going to rely on Crockett. Crockett's going to bring them back.

[A]

Wow. Could not have said it better myself, Jasmine. And that was the whole ad, by the way, just to be clear. I didn't cut it off in the middle. I know you're watching that, thinking, oh, you must. You must have. You didn't show us the whole thing. No, that's it. That's the whole. There's no punchline. It's just Trump calling her stupid, and then it ends.

That's it. That's her opening argument. Her opening argument to be in the Senate is that the president thinks she's stupid. That's it. So it's your first ad. It's a big deal. This is your chance to say, here's why you should elect me. There's a lot of other ads. We're talking about other things, but here's kind of my thesis statement. Here it is, right? Here's my. Here's my elevator pitch. This is your chance to make your elevator pitch to the voters. Here's what it boils down to. Here's why you should elect me. And for Jasmine Crockett, what she's saying is, the reason you should elect me is that Donald Trump says I'm stupid. That's it. The premise of her mission statement is that Trump says she has a low iq. Now, usually if you're going to do an ad like this, which I wouldn't really recommend, I wouldn't recommend having an ad where anyone is calling you low iq, especially if it's so obviously true. But if you're gonna do it, then the way that you would do it is you would have the comments from all the haters and not just one guy. But you wanna have. I mean, really, I'm a little offended, too, because I've called her low IQ so many times. I mean, I've called her stupid. I Know, I'm not the president, but you could really spruce this up because a lot of us on the right have been calling you stupid. Jasmine, I've called you stupid so many times. I say it every day. And so, I mean, well, you can't make a spot for me. I think you could do a big compilation. Compilation could be probably an hour long, really two hours long, of just everyone on the right calling you stupid. But here's what you would do, and this is what I would recommend, if I had been asked is.

And this is the way it would normally go for this. Like, I think what she's going for is it would be something like this. You have the montage of, she's stupid. She'll never make it. She's dumber than a box of rocks, right? You know, she has the intelligence of a sea cucumber. All that kind of stuff. You would have all of that, and then it would lead to some kind of response, some kind of punchline where you demonstrate that you have transcended the doubters and the haters and that their criticisms are not true. Right? So in this case, it would be. It would be like, Jasmine Crockett has low iq, right? Low iq. Low iq. Low IQ for the first half of the ad. And then cut to a montage of Jasmine Crockett doing and saying a lot of impressive and smart things.

That's the way that would go. But the problem, I think, for Crockett is that she has never done or said anything impressive ever in her entire life. The moment you hear her open her mouth and say anything, it is incredibly obvious that she cannot possibly have an IQ above 85 at a maximum. And so they don't have that. So that means that they don't have the response, they don't have the punchline, and they only have the setup. And that's it. It's like if you've ever seen one of those, you know, one of those hype videos or, like, highlight reels of a football player, let's say. And in the beginning of the. Of the video, it's a montage. It's like if you saw a Hype video on YouTube, there's a million of them of Lamar Jackson and Baltimore Ravens qb, who's having a really bad season, by the way. So maybe the doubters are right all along. That's a different conversation. But anyway, it's like a hype video where in the beginning, it's all the people saying, oh, he'll never make it. He's really a running back. He's not good enough to be a quarterback back in this league. And you get all the. You know, you get all the haters and doubters, and then you cut to, oh, he's washed up. He's whatever. He's. He's a bust. And then you cut to.

Right? Needle drop, Boom. Now we have him making a whole bunch of great plays and proving the doubters wrong and. And winning, right? That's usually the way that goes. And this would be like a hype reel of an athlete where you get the beginning. He's washed up. He's a bum. He's past his prime. He's a draft bust. He's not gonna make it. He's no good. And then it just ends. That's it. That's the end of it.

So the message is basically, well, you know, they said I couldn't do it. They said, I'm not good enough. They said, I'm too stupid. And turns out they were kind of right. You know, the doubters. They kind of had me pegged on that one. I do suck. That's basically what she's saying. It is the worst political ad I've ever seen. It is this maybe. Maybe even beats that Christine O' Donnell ad from, like, 15 or 20 years ago, if you remember. That was the.

Tea Party lady who was. What was it? She was accused of witchcraft or something. And then she put out an ad in the beginning of the. The ad opens with her staring into the camera and saying, I am not a witch. And that was the worst ad of all time. We'd never seen an ad that terrible. And that was her, I think maybe her first ad, or maybe it wasn't. But it's just the opening line of the ad is you saying, I'm not a witch. And I thought that no ad could ever be worse than that, but I think this might have a beat. And with Jasmine Crockett, what makes it so bad? It's not just that she's highlighting her low iq. I mean, that's the big problem with the ad. But the other problem is that the entire pitch revolves around Trump, Right? The real pitch to voters here is that Trump doesn't like her. That's the actual point that she's making, obviously. And that's all she has, because she hasn't done anything for her constituents. She hasn't achieved anything. She hasn't done anything. She's done absolutely nothing except appear on podcasts and say a lot of really dumb things.

And so her whole pitch for why she should be in the Senate is that Trump doesn't like her.

I will say, though, that Jasmine Crockett did present a little bit more of a robust case at her campaign kickoff eventually, when we were treated to.

Whatever this is. Exactly. And we gonna see how this go.

[D]

All right, y' all ready?

[A]

Let's get into it.

[C]

Okay.

[D]

She ain't never scared if she ain't never been. Who was willing to go toe to toe against the president? I can't wrap my head around someone who votes Republican. She advocate for feeding kids. They protect folks touching them. Trubin baiting his own country. Country with an army. What a joke. We remember Pearl harbor by illegally bombing boats. But y' all thought we wasn't gonna do nothing. Buddy, think again. They only trying to scare out her running cause they think she'll win. Listen. Thought I told y' all we ain't never scared. Now look who name on the docket. Got two words for every racist bigot. Jasmine Crockett.

[A]

Y' all hear the words?

[D]

Me, I hope my money goes. Society isn't trying to say affordability's a hope she stand on business. Awesome toast. Texas dope don't need no more Bad built bleach blonde butch bodies moving forward.

[A]

So.

[D]

So some of the words messed up.

[A]

Yeah. Not. Not exactly a serious campaign. Just to summarize, not only do you have a bad rap song, but the guy performing it doesn't even remember the words. And, you know, rap has. This is kind of a whole other topic, but rap music has fallen off a cliff. And I think recently it was like the first time in decades that there was not a single rap song in the top 40. And that was a few weeks ago. I'm not sure if that's still the case, but it's not as popular as it used to be. I think there's a lot of reasons for that. And, I mean, one of the reasons is that every genre of music has become, shall we say, urbanized. And. Which means that it's kind of like rap doesn't have a lane anymore. You don't really need it. Even when country now sounds like urban now, it's like, well, what do we need rap for? That's one of the problems. But another problem is that. Is that it's kind of. That it's just kind of. It's sort of lazy. Like, if you're. If you're doing a. If you're. You know, if you're performing a rap, at least make the words rhyme. That's the whole point. I mean, it's a very lyrical form of art form. And I do believe it is an art form. It can be an art form.

But it's very lyrical. And so you have to actually rhyme. And I'm listening to that. And he tries to rhyme Republican with folks touching them.

It doesn't quite work. I mean, it's hard to come up with a word that rhymes with the Republican. I'll agree with you, but maybe just find a different line.

And, you know, some people have wondered what. What Jasmine Crockett is really up to here. She's launching this campaign in Texas, a Trump state, a red state. Her entire platform is that she hates Trump and Trump hates her, and she's running on that platform in, again, a Trump state. So what's the strategy here? What's the point? And the most obvious answer is that she's. She's low iq. She's a very stupid person. And that kind of explains it. But also the other part of the answer is that she isn't trying to win necessarily. Right? That explains a lot of these people. Jasmine Crockett wants to be an influencer. That's all she wants to be her real dream. I mean, if Jasmine Crockett could do anything at all, anything, she wouldn't be president. If someone offered her that on a silver platter and said.

You can be present, here's a button. Press this button and you'll be president.

She would not press the button. If the other option, if the other button she could press is, okay, press this button and you could have 20 million Instagram followers and a successful podcast. She would take the latter in a heartbeat. That is her dream. That's her actual goal. And you have to understand that.

Nowadays that is the goal of a huge number of people in politics. They're not scheming to become president. They're scheming to become podcasters, to become influencers. That's what they want to do. They want attention. That's what drives them.

And that is. And I know you might say, well, it's always been that way. No, it definitely hasn't. I mean, obviously there's the obvious reason that podcasts and social media influencers didn't exist until recently, but just the underlying motivation of somebody like Jasmine Crockett. It's incredibly obvious. I'm not saying anything. This should not be a revelation to you. She just wants attention. She really badly wants attention. And that has not always been the case. That that is not what motivated people to get into politics in the past, is wanting attention for attention's Sake.

And it's bad enough that a lot of these people, they don't even really thirst for power anymore. Now, institutionally, we just talked about in the opening, like the Democrat Party, institutionally, still wants power and is much better at scheming for it generally than Republicans are and take more advantage of the power that they have than Republicans ever do. So institutionally, that's still the case, but individually, for a lot of these, especially the newer people in Congress, the people who are like millennials and younger.

What they want is attention.

And it's so bad that I wish, like I'm longing for the old days when every politician there were all a bunch of power hungry lunatics and all they wanted was power and control. That would be better. That would be better than what we have now. Because at least scheming to take power requires a certain amount of intelligence, a certain amount of ambition, a certain amount of skill. And along the way in your quest for power, you might, as a byproduct, do a few useful things for the American people. Or you might not, but you might. I mean, there's a chance, there's a chance that in your lust for power and in all the scheming that you do, that maybe it requires you to do a few things that are actually useful.

But if your only objective, like Jasmine Crockett, if all you care about is just fame and attention, then you'll never do anything useful or good, even by accident.

Like, seeking power is not a bad thing in and of itself. There's a lot of bad things you can do with power, but wanting to have power is not necessarily a bad thing in and of itself. Seeking attention, though, just for its own sake is always bad, is always bad. And nothing useful or good ever comes out of that, ever. And this is. These are the kinds of people that are getting elected now. And in another, and it's not gonna be that long, especially as the baby boomers age out and it's nothing but millennials in Congress, millennials and Gen Z, it's gonna be nothing but people of no interest in governing at all. They have no interest in power. They don't even want power because power that requires like, puts pressure on you to do things and they prefer to not have that. Jasmine Crockett wants to be exactly where she is right now, where she's at. She really doesn't have any power. Trump is in office, got a Republican in office. Republicans control Congress. There's nothing for her to do. She's not expected to do anything. And so she could just go out there and do a lot of interviews, do a lot of podcasts, you know, that sort of thing, and just be an influencer. That's what she wants. That's what she wants. And we are rapidly approaching a point where that's all we have are people like that. We're officially in the midst of the holiday season, and all the Christmas chaos can mean it's hard to find peace amid the cookies, wrapping paper and half packed suitcases that litter your front entryway. So this year, take a breath, lean into the stillness of the Advent season. Thankfully, my friends at Hallow have designed a challenge that's impactful and perfect for a busy holiday schedule. This Advent, you'll dive into the real story of Christmas, discover that it was probably just as chaotic as our own, and learn to surrender it all to God anyway and find real peace. Throughout Hallow's advent challenge, pray 25 be still. You'll have the opportunity to meditate on the words of Psalm 46, Be still and know that I am God, and hear powerful excerpts from the reed of God and the ruthless elimination of. Hurry. Experience the stillness of the Holy family amidst the chaos and busyness of the world, and dive into the story of the Nativity. Get 3 months free of Hallow today at hallow.com mattwall to prepare for your most peaceful Christmas season yet. All right, let's see, what else do we have?

McDonald's has released.

A fully well, we just talked about a bad advertisement, so there's a little bit of a.

Common thread here. Here's another ad, bad one in a different way. McDonald's has just released a fully AI generated Christmas ad. And this is one of the first major companies, to my knowledge, to put out a fully generated ad. Certainly this is not the first fully generated AI ad to exist. I mean, those are all over the place. Those are all over the place. Now you see them all over the place, but especially on YouTube and that sort of thing, like the ads on the Internet seem like they're almost all AI now, but as far as a company of McDonald's size and influence, I think that this is new. This is an escalation in AI's war on humanity. The account culture crave on X posts the video with this caption. McDonald's has released an AI generated Christmas ad. The studio behind it says they hardly slept for several weeks while writing AI prompts and refining the shots. AI didn't make this film. We did. Comments have been turned off on YouTube. Of course they have. So before we even play it. I can just say, no, you did not make this ad. We've been up for weeks writing prompts. Oh, wow, that sounds really hard.

No, you didn't make anything. Just to be clear, you did not. AI Made it. That's the difference between AI and, like, people were talking about this today, and people were saying, what's the difference between this and, you know, CGI is a huge difference. CGI is a. Is a. Is a tool. It's a. It's an art form. And so you need actual artists to then go in and use this tool. They're just using the computer to create. Like, they have to come up with the ideas, come up with the concepts, and then create it. Which is why, like, I could not. If you told me, oh, and you gave me a computer, you gave me the tools to do it and said, create a cgi, you know, film or something, I wouldn't be able to do it. I can't just do that because it requires skill. You have to learn how to do it. And even if you learn how to do it, there's people who are good at it and people who are bad at it. But AI, like, if you gave me the same AI program that McDonald's used, I could create this exact thing. Because all it requires you to do is just type in, generate an image of this, generate a commercial about X, and boom, it pops out. So, no, you didn't make it.

Any more than if you're at a restaurant. You know what it is? It's like if you're at a restaurant and you look at a menu and you say, yes, I'll have the New York strip, medium rare, which is the only correct way to order a steak. You didn't make the steak. Like, in no way did you. Are you responsible for if the steak is great, if it's the best steak you ever had, you do not get any of the credit for that at all. All you did was point at a menu and say, I'll have that.

And that's what AI is. It's just you selecting, you know, it's just you saying, I'll take that. Yep.

You didn't create it, so this was not created. This is not art. But here it is anyway.

It's the most terrible time of the year. All the shocks turn to mayhem. Even Santa, no space and the tree redecorated your place. It's the most terrible time of the year.

[B]

The roast turned to charcoal and the cookies burn, too.

[A]

Freaking chaos. It feels like a zoo. It's the most terrifying Time of the year.

So you flee from the madness, the.

[B]

Lights and the cheer, and hide out.

[A]

In McDonald's till January. Cheer.

[C]

Wow.

[A]

I hate it. I know you're shocked. I know you're shocked that that's my take. You're watching that and you're like, what's Matt's take on this? I wonder how he feels. I wonder if he's gonna be. If he's gonna like it or not. Well, I don't like it. It is witless, charmless, lifeless, artless. It sucks. It's awful. I hate it.

I hate everything about it. I hate everyone associated with it. I hate everyone who likes it. I won't go that far. I don't hate the people. I don't hate people. But I hate everything else. And I don't hate the people associated with this or the people who like it. But I have deep.

Contempt, resentment for those individuals. That's how I feel. I have no respect for them as people. I don't hate them. I just have no. I have no respect for you. If you watch that and you go, I kind of like that. In fact, there was someone reacting to this. I saw the post on X, said it was beautiful. Beautiful. How dare you. How could you even say that word.

In to describe this lifeless, disgusting, weird, uncanny, algorithmic slop. Beautiful, really.

And you know what? This is not even. This is to say nothing of the message of the ad, which is also awful. We have to. We have to gloss over every. There's. It's bad in so many ways that we don't have time to spend on it, but the message of the ad is also terrible. It's the most terrible time of the year. What that is your Christmas ad, is that it's a terrible time of the year. I understand it's supposed to be a joke, but it's a bad joke. It's a bad joke.

It's not relatable, okay? Like an ad. Marketing, making an advertisement. It's supposed to be relatable. People should be able to relate to it emotionally. Nobody hates Christmas. Who do you think? No one hates Christmas. I don't hate. I hate everything. I don't hate Christmas. How could you possibly hate Christmas Now? You might get stressed out a little bit, but nobody thinks Christmas is a terrible time of the year. It's like, cartoonish. What are you, Scrooge? I mean, what is it? The Grinch? Who is this for? Who is this for?

This is for the Grinch in his tower above Whoville. He's gonna look at that Ad, and he's gonna love it.

No one else is looking at that ad and relating to it. So they're taking these Christmas images and Christmas tune and trying to get their customers to associate negative feelings with Christmas, which aside from being anti Christmas and thus anti Christian, and yes, it is anti Christian. And if you doubt that, well, you would never see this with any other religion. Okay. They would never put out an ad describing any other religion's holiday as a. As a terrible time of the year. Okay, where is the ad describing Ramadan as a terrible time of the year? And if that ad did exist, everyone would agree that it's, you know, Islamophobic or whatever. I mean, I wouldn't use that term, but a lot of people would. So, you know, on top of that, it's just bad marketing. What's the pitch? That the Christmas season is terrible and stressful, so we should seek solace and comfort inside a McDonald's. Yes. Because when I think of a warm, quiet, peaceful place, I think of a McDonald's fast food restaurant. Right. I think of a fast food establishment.

I mean, if you're trying to take it that direction, which I don't think is the right direction, then the final shot. I'm tired of doing everyone. This is the whole show now, doing everyone's job for them. I'm telling you how to do ads.

But this is why I've said before, marketing. The whole marketing industry is nonsense. Like, no one in the marketing industry has any idea what they're doing. If you're hiring anyone to do marketing, they're just ripping it like they're a bunch of scam artists. No one in marketing knows how to market anything ever. Okay? I feel comfortable saying that. It's an entire. It's a multi billion dollar industry, and everyone's wasting their money. Every company that hires marketing people, you realize they're just ripping you off. They're just scamming you. They have no clue. They have no clue how to do it.

Any normal person could look at it and say, well, no, a much better way would be to do it this way. So I don't have a marketing degree, but I can tell you if you want to go for that, oh, Christmas is a hectic time of year. Okay, well, then the final shot should be a family at home enjoying their McDonald's peacefully, fireplace glowing in the background. Okay. It's hectic and crazy around the holidays. You don't have time to make a meal. Go to. Go to McDonald's. We'll make a meal for you bring it home, share it with your family.

That would make some kind of sense. But instead they want their customers to see McDonald's itself, the building, as some kind of sanctuary, some kind of warm and inviting place. So we should associate negative feelings with Christmas, but positive feelings with the inside of a McDonald's.

Right? Yeah, because, you know, the unbathed homeless guy sitting three stalls over.

Is asking everyone for their change because he wants to buy a meal, but really he's going to go outside and buy crack with it. Yeah, that's. That's what I want to see at Christmas. When I walk into a McDonald's and everything is gross and, like, sticky and the garbage cans are overflowing and the Coke machine doesn't work and there's a touch screen thing that's all smudged with fingerprints. People have their gross hands all over it, and everyone is just in a bad mood and the employees hate you for walking in, and half the people are homeless and everyone smells and everyone's fat. When I walk into that, that's what I think. That's what I want around Christmas time. That's what. That's. That's my. That's my happy place. That's my peace and solace. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. Okay, so the marketing doesn't make any sense. But. But that's what you get from AI. You know, AI is not human, doesn't have a soul. It doesn't have feelings. It doesn't have a mind. It doesn't understand how to harness the Christmas spirit to sell stale chicken nuggets. It doesn't understand anything. And aside from the message, the ad itself, the imagery is bland and bleak and gray and artless and lifeless and. And just weird. I saw people reacting to this saying, you can't even tell that it's AI. Really, you can't. You can't tell that that's AI. Oh, well, then we're doomed. Well, then we are doomed as a. As a species at that point. Because if you. If that's already fooling some people that I. I could tell that's AI immediately. You didn't need to tell me. That was AI. Two seconds into it, it's like, yeah, this is AI. Obvious is clearly AI. It's not even does. It's. It's. It's not hard to even spot. And that's already fooling people. Oh, well, we're. I mean, we're just done. We're done at that point. Because if that's fooling you and if there are people who are satisfied with that. If there are people who would look at that and say, yeah, it's fine, yeah, you know, this is, I'll take this instead.

Well then.

I don't know. Game over. Are you looking for a gift that actually stands the test of time? With our show sponsor, policygenius, you can give your family the gift of security and peace of mind with life insurance. Policygenius makes finding life insurance simple, helping you secure real coverage so your loved ones have the financial safety net they need when it matters most. Policygenius is a simple online marketplace where you can compare quotes from all the major insurers in one place, completely free. They've got a team of license experts who will walk you through everything, answer your questions, deal with all the paperwork and help you figure out what coverage actually makes sense for you without all the confusing insurance jargon. The whole point is to find you the most affordable policy that actually fits your situation. And based on thousands of five star reviews on Google and Trustpilot, well, they're clearly really good at it. With Policygenius, real users have gotten 20 year $2 million policies for just $53 a month. Don't wait until next year. Give your family the gift of security today with Policygenius. Head to Policygenius.com Walsh to compare life insurance quotes from top companies and see how much you can save. That's policygenius.com Walsh Here's a.

Well, here's a truly awful story.

Daily Mail has this chilling moment. Afghan asylum seekers drag 15 year old girl into the bushes before raping her pair jailed over horrific attack. That's the headline. And so apparently there's video. This is a CCTV footage that was released.

Which we're not going to put up on the screen, but it says this is the moment. Two teenage Afghan asylum seekers dragged a screaming schoolgirl towards a dark park where they would rape her. Small boat migrants Jan Jahanzeb and israr Nyazal, both 15, were on Monday jailed for sexually assaulting the a 15 year old. They were both named following a legal victory by the Daily Mail. Chilling CCTV released in the wake of their sentencing show the boys leading their victim across a bridge where they would assault her.

Separate footage captured by the victim on her phone was so appalling that one of the boys own barristers warned it would lead to rioting if the public were to see it. And then it goes on. You could find the article. I didn't want to keep reading it, but.

There'S apparently a video that this girl Took while she was being dragged away. And it's three minutes long. And it's, I mean, it's as horrifying as you could possibly imagine. Probably a lot more horrifying than that. And.

The.

Lawyers for these guys are saying, well, we can't release it, it will cause a riot. Well, then I say release it. I mean, it should be released. I don't want to see it. I wouldn't watch it myself, but it should be released for the sake of anyone who still needs a wake up call. If you don't need a wake up call, you don't need to see something like that. But if you do need a wake up call, then maybe you need to see it because this is what's happening. There are people that are being imported into our country and into every western country. This happened in the uk, not the us, but it's the same thing. These are the people that are being imported. So these migrants.

These migrants claimed asylum. They were asylum seekers and they were granted asylum, I guess. And then they proceeded to lure a young girl into the woods and sexually assault her. And this happens all over the Western world every single day. I mean, there's thousands and thousands and thousands of cases like this that have happened over just, over the last few years.

And it just continues to happen. And this is why we need to be done with asylum. Okay? We need to be done with a lot of things. We need to be done with illegal immigration, we need to be done with.

Much of even legal immigration. We should be done with all of it for now, as far as I'm concerned. But we certainly need to be done with asylum. That's where we're at. Get rid of asylum. Asylum is a scam. I mean, we have imported the worst, most degenerate filth into the west under the guise of asylum. Because here's what happens, right? Here's what this is a thing that isn't. People don't talk about enough. You think about asylum and what you're supposed to think, what the image that's supposed to come to your mind is. Well, like the huddled masses, right, the women and children and the persecuted and they come seeking. That's the image that asylum is supposed to bring to mind. And if you're not paying attention at all, then maybe it still does. But in reality, that's not, that's not what happens. Asylum means that the most dysfunctional people from other countries, people who could not hack it, people who were rejected by their own communities, people with no skills, people often with no morals, come Here, come to Western countries and claim asylum. They're claiming asylum not from persecution, not from oppression, but from their own dysfunction. Basically.

They'Re in their country, they couldn't hack it. They couldn't make it. They got nothing to offer. They're totally dysfunctional. None of the people in their own community don't want them. And they come here and they basically say, I suck at everything. I'm an outcast. My own country doesn't want me. I have nothing to offer. Please take care of me. And then we say yes.

And they thank us by robbing us and scamming us and killing us and raping our wives and children. That's what's happening. It's an abomination.

And I'm sick of it. I'm just sick of it. We have to be done with it. Oh, but you don't have sympathy for the plight of foreigners? No, I don't. Okay? I don't.

I'll just be honest with you. I have sympathy for my own people and my own country. I don't have enough sympathy to go around. I can't have sympathy for the entire world. I can't muster that. Nobody can. Not in any meaningful way.

And even if we could. Okay, fine. So, okay, the foreigners have my pity. Great. I don't even know what that means. Oh, great. Okay, I have sympathy for them. I have pity for them. Okay? I can't do anything about it. You can't do anything about it? We can't do anything about it. We can't solve all the world's problems. We can't help everybody. There's 8 billion people in the world. We can. We can't give them all food. We can't give them all places. We literally can't do it. It's not possible.

And so we should sympathize with them. Okay, fine. What does that mean? It just means I feel something. Sure, okay, they have my pity. Great. So take the pity and you can have all the pity. They come here seeking asylum. Asylum. Okay, you want pity? Here's your pity. Here's all. Here's a heaping load of pity. Now get the hell out. Take the pity and go somewhere else. I hope the pity makes you feel better. Okay, tell us your sob story. Oh, that sounds pretty bad. Okay, anyway, now you can leave.

Go seek asylum somewhere else. Why is it our job, why is it the job of the west to provide asylum to the misfits and outcasts from other countries? That's what it is. That's what asylum is. That's what most of these refugees are. They are the misfits and outcasts of other countries.

What happened to beggars can't be choosers, by the way. So you washed out of your own country. And that means that now the best countries have to take you in.

You leapfrog right over all the other. So you go from your terrible crapole country that you don't want to be in and you get to go right to the best country. Well, I couldn't make it in this crap old terrible country. So I think I'll just go to the best country ever and. And have them take care of me. No. How about no? Here's an idea. If you're an African asylum seeker, seek asylum in an African country. If you're an Arab asylum seeker, seek asylum in an Arab country. If you're an Asian asylum seeker, seek asylum in an Asian country. Let them find asylum in a country with a similar culture. How about that?

When people say. When people say, we got to bring in the asylum seekers, and then we say no, the response is, oh, what are these people going to do? Or they're all going to die. Well, number one, how's that my problem? Number two. What? Do all the other countries in the world not exist? What do you mean there's all these other countries? Why not put some of the onus on them? How is it all the onus on us and 0% of the onus is on anyone else? How does that make sense?

And guess what? If none of those other countries will take them in, well, that's all the more reason why we shouldn't either. Like, if any country has a moral obligation to accept Arab asylum seekers, it's an Arab country. If any country has a moral obligation to accept African asylum seekers, it's an African country. And if they won't do it, if they're looking at these people and saying, we don't want them here, well, then that makes me go. That's all the more reason why. Well, I don't want them either. So if your answer is, well, they try, they can't get asylum anymore. No other country will take them. Well, then I don't want them. Why the hell do we want them?

You're telling me they've been rejected by, like, their whole continent and we're going to take them and now they're going to move in next door. It's like, imagine if somebody From a neighborhood 20 miles away were to come knocking on your door. You never met this person, have no idea who they Are, they're not from your town, never met them. They knock on your door explaining that they've run out of food and they're unemployed and they need, they need you to give them food. They're not asking, right? They're not asking. Is not even like someone coming. And, and we're not talking about widows and orphans, we're talking about like a guy, say a 19 year old guy from a, from a town 21 miles over, right? Just shows up at your door, knocks on the door, maybe doesn't even knock. I mean, for the analogy to really work, he just opens the door. He opens the door and shouts in, says, hey, I need some food, I'm hungry. Hey, I'm hungry, I need food.

No requests, no humility, nothing like that, just a demand. Now you probably tell them to piss off right away. Like there's not going to be any conversation. It's like, no, get the hell off my property. You're going to pull out a gun and say, get off of my property right now. But I'm hungry, I need food. Okay, Go get food somewhere else. Get the hell. I don't know you, okay? You're not my kid. I'm feeding my kid lunch right now. You're not my child. Get the hell out of my house.

But if you did get into any conversation with them, which is more than you're obligated, the first thing you're going to ask is, who are you and where are you from and why are you coming here? Exactly?

And let's say they tell you, Well, I live 20 miles away.

And then you'll ask, okay, so you live in a house, so why did you come here? Like, why did you come here specifically? I don't even know you. Like, why did you get into a car and drive all this way if you want food, if you're a little hungry and you want food, why did you come here? Of all the houses, including all the houses right next to yours, why did you come to mine? Why didn't you ask your neighbors?

Now they'll answer one of two ways. They might say that they did ask their neighbors and all their neighbors refused. And if that's what they say, then you can be very suspicious. You're going to say, okay, so all the people who know you and live next to you would not help you. Maybe they're all terrible, but more likely you're terrible, right? Either I can believe that you live in a neighborhood of scumbags, so there's like hundreds of scumbags, or it's just one, that's the other explanation, that you're a scumbag and that's why they're not helping you.

Or maybe he'll say, well I never asked my neighbors, I just came right to you.

Well that's going to make me think again. I'm going to be suspicious again. Like why didn't you ask your neighbors if you need help? Why did you specifically go to someone who would not know you or anything about you? Why did you go far out of your way to a stranger, to somebody with no frame of reference who doesn't know you and has no background on you to ask for help? That makes me suspicious. And so I'm going to close my door and tell you you have two seconds to get the hell off my porch before I start shooting. Especially if you're a full grown able bodied man. Because the other thing is if you're a full grown able bodied man and you're 19 years old or whatever, you should be able to figure out how to get some food. What are you doing knocking on a door saying you should be, you should be able to figure it out buddy.

And if you're that incompetent and lazy, well that's not my problem either way, not my problem. Get the hell off my porch. And I think that's what we would all do in, in if this happened in our own homes. And this is, it's, it's no different. It's no different when, for, for the country when we got these strangers showing up God knows where demanding help and it's like why did you come? What are you doing here? I don't know you. I don't know anything about you. I have no background on you. You very specifically are not asking for help from any of the people around you who might be able to relate more to you. That makes me suspicious. But anyway, I don't have to explain myself. This is our country, not yours. Leave.

You ever feel too busy to make healthy choices? Do you find yourself too tired at the end of the day to cook a healthy meal and find yourself frequenting your favorite drive thru more than you would like? Well, you're not alone. Life can make it hard to make healthy choices sometimes. But there's one option that even the busiest person can make time for and that's balance of nature. Balance of nature's whole health system. Supplements make it easy to eat the fruits, veggies, spices and fibers that you're supposed to eat on a daily basis. You can take them however you like, swallow them with water, chew them or open the capsules and mix the powder into your meals or drinks. Inside, you'll find 47 ingredients from 100% real whole fruits, vegetable, spices and fibers. Everything from cinnamon to turmeric, mango to pineapple, spinach to mushrooms. Simple way to give your body the nutrition it needs every day. I personally love it because of its convenience. When I'm traveling for work or trying to keep up with the kids, it gives me a simple no mess, no stress way to make sure I'm getting all the essential nutrients in my diet. New and existing customers can get 50% off the whole health system for life with this limited time offer. Go to balanceofnature.com to claim this offer. Finally, quickly, you know it's about that because I can't end on. I gotta end on something a little bit slightly nicer. You know, it's about that time of year again for the Santa discourse to start. And every year I'm seeing this on social media. You know, the great Santa debate. And it started again. I don't know who started. Probably not any one person started it, but I'm seeing it pop up in my feed again. All the debating about Santa and should you tell your kids about now, by the way, if you have little children in earshot, you should turn this off. I mean, a lot of the conversations we have on the show are not appropriate for little kids, including the one we just had. So they should be listening anyway. But if they are.

You should turn it off. Cause I do want to chime in on this because it does annoy me. A lot of posts on X that have been popping up. Here's just one, for example from an account I follow. It says if you tell your kids there's a Santa, you're lying to them. They're going to later find out that you lied to them and realize that you may again lie to them in the future. I don't know why parents do this, although mine didn't, but it's a good indicator of bad parenting in my book. So there's a lot of stuff like that. You're lying to your kids about Santa, you're a bad parent, you're traumatizing them. They'll never trust you again, all this kind of stuff. And let me just say this. We are a Santa household. We are Santa believers, okay? And we are Santa maxing, as the kids might say every Christmas. Are we lying to our kids? Are we engaged in a deceptive conspiracy? No. Because here's what you have to understand about young Kids, they don't understand.

What not real even means. So these parents that feel so proud of themselves because they go to like their 4 year old and say, well, Santa isn't real. Do you understand? Your 4 year old doesn't know what you're talking about. Do you understand to your four year old, not real doesn't mean anything for your four year old when you say Santa isn't real. Well, he's like, well, what do you mean? I see Santa on tv, I see him at the mall. What do you mean he's not real? Clearly real. And that's it. Like that, that's all that a young kid understands. Young children think that Superman is real, okay? They think fairies and leprechauns and dragons and mermaids are real. They think monsters are real. They're worried about, they're like, they're actually worried about a monster in their closet. That's like a real thing that a five year old is concerned about in his life. And when you say, we've all had, maybe you had this conversation with your five year old, you said, well, monsters aren't real number one. And there's like, there's not. I tried to reason this way with my own kids. I open the closet, say like, look, there's not. It's a wall. There's nothing in here. And the thing you're worried about doesn't even exist. And even if it did exist, like it's not in your closet. Look at the closet. There's nothing in here, I promise you. But doesn't matter. They don't understand that because they have it in their imagination. They have it in their mind. And so if they have it in their mind, then it's real. And that's all they know. And they think every character they see on TV is real. Paw Patrol is a documentary for your 4 year old. Your 4 year old is not watching a cartoon show. Your 4 year old is watching like the real life adventures live. You know, for a four year old, Paw Patrol is cops. It's like watching live footage of actual police officers at work. It's just that they happen to be, they happen to be, they happen to be dogs. So that's what it is. And so here's my question with your kids. They have this fantastical view of the world. Do you go out of your way? I know their parents are proud of themselves. We don't do Santa in our house. We're too honest. We're far too honest for that. Well, do you extend that to everything else? Fantastical that they believe. Do you go out of your way to make sure they don't believe in anything else? Like if your daughter came up to you, if your five year old daughter came up to you and said, hey, daddy, I saw a fairy in the garden, I was out in the garden, I saw a fairy. Would you, would you, would you like, bend down and look her in the eyes and say, fairies aren't real? I know, I know you're lying. You didn't see a fairy. Okay. Debunked, actually. Fact check. Fairies aren't real. I could show you on snopes. Come here, let's look it up. I'll show you the snopes. It's been debunked.

Actually. Fairies don't exist. Do you do that with your five year old or are you like a normal person? And when your five year old says, I saw a fairy in the garden, do you say, oh, you did. Awesome. Where was it? What did it look like? Oh, wow, that's amazing.

I would hope it's the latter. I would hope that that's how you respond. Is that lying? I mean, if telling your kids about Santa is lying, that would be lying too.

Is it lying? You know it's not. It's playing a game. That's what it is. You're playing a game. This is a point that I think Jordan Peterson has made. I think it's a good way of putting it. Like, what is it when you tell your kids about Santa? Are you lying to. You're not lying, you're playing a game. It's a game is what it is. And now your kids don't really know that it's a game, but they don't know that any game is a game. Right? Everything is real. Children live in a fantasy world where magic is real. And going out of your way to kill this kind of magical thinking on a five year old is ridiculous to me. Let them live in that world, their children. Why take it from them? I mean, really, they get to live like your kids get to live in a world for a short amount of time where there's actually a magical fat guy who flies through the air on reindeer and comes down a chimney and gives them presents that, I mean, it's a little. As you get older and you think about it more cynically, it's a little bit creepy, but. But for a kid it's like amazing. And they get to actually live in that world as far as they know. And why not let them?

And when do you tell your kids that Santa isn't Real. Well, that's not difficult to figure out. You tell them at precisely the moment when they grow out of it anyway. Kids grow out of it. Eventually they kind of figure it out. And when that happens, you tell them that Santa was just a game. I don't even. Like, I hear from these adults sometimes who talk about, well, when I found out Santa wasn't real, I was traumatized. I never trusted my parents again. Okay, well, then get a grip. Okay? That's a you problem. Really? You're an adult still. Still dealing with the trauma of finding out Santa wasn't real. Really? Because what should have happened, what happened with me, it's like, I think my parents told me offici. I don't even think my parents ever officially told me. I just kind of got to an age, and I'm like, well, this is obviously isn't. This obviously isn't real. You just kind of. It's just. You just see it because you lose some of the innocence of childhood, and you start to realize, like, okay, well, there's no fairies and leprechauns and stuff like that. And then you realize that Santa isn't real. And, you know, maybe as parents, you sit down. We did this with our oldest kids, our oldest twins, a few years ago, did the talk, it's the first time about Santa. And that was their reaction. I told them, you know, the Santa isn't real. And they didn't collapse in tears. They didn't start screaming. They didn't. They weren't traumatized. You know what they said? Both of my kids, they said, yeah, dad, we know. And that was it. That was the whole conversation. And they were excited because now they get to play the game on the other side with their younger siblings. And now they get to sort of be Santa around Christmas time. They get to help with some of that stuff. And they have a lot of fun with that. Not because they're malicious and they're excited to lie to their siblings, but it's just a fun game that now they get to play, and they get to help their younger siblings, you know, kind of have this kind of magical reality. So. And they take the job very seriously.

So that's it. That's. That should be the. I would hope that that would just be the final statement on Santa, and I have decreed it as so. And hopefully we can all leave it there. You heard it here. And that's the end of the conversation. And that will do it for the show today. Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening. Talk to you tomorrow. Have a Great day.

[C]

Godspeed.

[A]

All of this is an illusion. An echo of a voice that has died.

And soon that echo will cease.

[C]

They say that Merlin is mad.

They say he was a king in Dovid. The son of a princess of lost Atlantis. They say the future and the past are known to him. That the fire and the wind tell him their secrets. Let the magic of the hill folk and druids come forth at his easy command.

They say he slew hundreds. Hundreds? Do you hear that? The world burned and trembled at his wrath.

[A]

The Merlin died long before you and.

[C]

I were born.

Merlin. Emrys has returned to the land of the living.

[B]

Vortigern is gone.

[A]

Rome is gone. The Saxon is here.

[C]

Saxon Hengist has assembled the greatest war host ever seen in the island of the Mighty. And before the summer is through, he means to take the throne.

And he will have it, if we are too busy squabbling amongst ourselves to take up arms against him. Here is your hope. A king will arise to hold all Britain in his hand. A high king will be the wonder of the world.

You.

[A]

To a future of peace.

[B]

There'll be no peace in these lands till we are all dust.

[A]

Men of the island of the Mighty, you stand together.

You stand as Britons. You stand as war.

[C]

Great darkness is falling upon this land.

These brothers are our only hope to stand against it.

[A]

Not our only hope, they say Merdin.

[C]

Slew 17 men with his own hands. I Cathay, he slew 500.

[A]

No man is capable of such a thing. No mortal man.