Maria Salazar (3:09)

What does the word dignity mean to you? To me, it means not having to live in the shadows. It means being proud to contribute to the economy and be respected for it. That's what 10 million illegal immigrants deserve. Let's let them work legally and generate over $100 billion in revenue for our Treasury. No path to citizenship, no right to vote in our elections, and no access to federal programs. It's called the Dignity act, where they can work and live without fear. It's the right thing to do, is the Christian thing to do. It's the American thing to do, so let's do.

Matt Walsh (3:48)

So. She says that the Dignity Dodd act is, quote, what 10 million illegal immigrants deserve. You're not going to find a more remarkable sentence from a sitting member of Congress. I mean, at the precise moment when the SAVE act is stalled out in the Senate, one of the most prominent Republicans in Congress is telling us that illegal aliens deserve an entirely new legal system just to shield them from deportation. Well, no, actually, they don't deserve that. 10 million illegal immigrants don't deserve anything except for immediate deportation. Keep in mind that in order for someone to deserve something, someone else has to owe that thing to them. Now, the idea that American citizens owe something, anything at all, to foreigners, to citizens of other nations who are flouting our laws, is deranged the extreme. And by the way, if these people really wanted dignity or Dignidad, they could go back where they came from instead of committing crimes for their own benefit. And in the meantime, the government should prioritize the dignity of its own citizens. I mean, how many Americans have been killed by foreign truck drivers who can't even read our street signs? How many Americans have seen their car insurance premium skyrocket because half of the people on the road are driving like they're back home in Mumbai. How many Americans, including students on college campuses, no longer feel safe going out for a jog or using public transit because they might turn out to be the next Lake and Riley? How many public schools are now delivering their daily announcements in Spanish over the PA system? How many Americans are going paycheck to paycheck just to afford their health insurance premiums while illegal aliens in blue states receive Medicaid and food stamps, something we're, we're told is supposedly impossible now? How many people are struggling to find work because every employer in their industry is looking to hire H1BS? How many Americans, the ones who are fortunate enough to have a job, are watching most of their paycheck disappear before they even receive it? How many of them are furious that 40% of their salary is earmarked for welfare payments which go directly into the hands of foreign fraudsters who are running at home daycares and home hospice services and autism treatment centers? I mean, if you want some more dignity in this country, start doing something about those problems. Those are actual problems, and the people who elected you are the ones who are facing those problems. So just at the outset, without reading a word of this bill, it's obviously junk and every leader of the Republican Party, to include Trump and Mike Johnson, should say so, but they aren't doing that, at least not yet. And therefore, it's important to drill down into the specifics of this legislation, as I promised to do yesterday. As bad as this bill obviously is, it's actually about 10 times worse than it appears on the surface. And for one thing, Salazar herself has no idea what she's doing. She has no way of ensuring that her law will only apply to 10 million people or 100 million people. She has no way of knowing whether these foreigners and their children are going to contribute to the economy or become permanent leeches. She's making those claims, but in reality, she has absolutely no idea what's going to happen if this bill ever becomes law. So let's start with section 2101, which implements the so called Dream Act. This would award lawful status to any alien who was, quote, 18 years of age or younger on the date on which the alien entered the United States and has continuously resided in the United States since such entry. Additionally, the alien must have been, quote, continuously physically present in the United States since January 1, 2021, and he must have obtained some kind of educational credential or be in the process of obtaining one. Now, he can't be a national security threat either. Nor can he be guilty of a crime involving moral turpitude. Multiple criminal convictions with an aggregate sentence of five years or more, or drug trafficking or prostitution. Now, although there is an asterisk for that quote, for humanitarian purposes, family unit, or if otherwise in the public interest, the Secretary may waive consideration of one misdemeanor offense if the alien has not been convicted of any offense in the five year period preceding the date on which the alien applies for the dignity program. Or two, up to two misdemeanor offenses if the alien has not been convicted of any offense in the ten year period preceding the date on which the alien applies for the dignity program. So you can still commit crimes in this country and be here illegally, depending on what those crimes are. And despite those additional crimes on top of illegal entry, you can qualify for the Dignad Act. Now again, nobody voted for this. Nobody wants this. It is over complicating something that is extremely straightforward. Illegal aliens are illegal aliens. If you came here illegally, then you have to go back to where you came from. Period. No further discussion should be necessary. But even if for some unknown reason you're tempted to entertain this provision, maybe you watch a lot of network television, maybe you're an affluent white liberal woman, then you should know that in fact, there's absolutely no way to verify any of this. We have no way of knowing when exactly an illegal alien entered this country. Every single one of them under this bill has an incentive to lie about their age and claim they entered the United States before they were 18. But we really have no way of knowing the truth because they snuck into the country illegally. Additionally, we, we have no way of verifying that these people continuously remained in the United States without interruption for five years. I mean, there are American citizens who have lived their entire lives in this country who would have a difficult time, difficult time proving that they never left, even for a short period of time. And it's insane for Democrats or anyone to suggest otherwise. I mean, these are the same people who claim it's impossible for anyone to get an ID or driver's license in this country. But now they're going to ask these people for definitive proof that they've never left the country in five years. How's that going to work? Historically, the federal government has made no real effort to verify the age of anyone crossing the border. And it often leads to catastrophe. Here's just one example from the Biden administration. Watch.

Corley Peel (10:13)

Thank you, Marillyn. A man accused of murdering another man, who he called his uncle, pleaded not guilty to the crime today. 24 year old Yeri Medina Ujoa appeared in court this morning. Investigators say that he used a fake name posing as a 17 year old and had been in the country illegally. News for Jackson reporter Corley Peel joining us live from the Duvall County Courthouse to the jail, I should say, to show us how the governor's office is getting involved here.

Matt Walsh (10:37)

Corley.

Corley Peel (10:38)

Sounds unusual.

Matt Walsh (10:38)

Usual

Laura Ingraham (10:42)

right now Ujoa is an immigration

Matt Walsh (10:43)

hold here at the jail. As New York Post reported, quote, a 24 year old Honduran immigrant who's charged with murder in the brutal stabbing death of a Florida man had crossed the US Border illegally months earlier while posing as an unaccompanied minor. According to the Post, Medina uloa was busted Oct. 7 in Jacksonville when he was found covered in blood after allegedly killing Francisco Javier Cellular, a 46, a father of four who had taken taken in the immigrant who told authorities he was 17. Police said they followed a trail of blood back to the victim's home, arrested him, placing him in a juvenile detention facility. It wasn't until Oct. 13 that authorities learned his real identity and his true age. So he enters this country claiming to be an unaccompanied minor. And because he made that claim, the Biden administration flew him to Florida at taxpayer expense where he murdered an American citizen and father of four. And even then, even after this brutal murder, it took authorities another week to verify his actual age and name. So with that in mind, how exactly is Salazar going to ensure that her bill only applies to people who actually arrived in this country before they were 18? It's impossible to verify on its face. These people don't even have to lie about their current age, which is what Medina Uloa did. They simply have to lie about the age they were when they arrived in the country at some point in the past. Last night, Credit where it's due. Laura Ingram on Fox News did an excellent job making some of these points in an interview with Republican Congressman Mike Lawler of New York who introduced the Dignidad act with Salazar. And in response, Lawlor lied about the bill because what else is he going to do? Watch.

Laura Ingraham (12:37)

How does an immigration officer determine millions and millions determine continuous presence and tell me the considerations they take into account to determine that.

Mike Lawler (12:54)

Well, look, if they cannot prove that, if they cannot prove continuous presence, they wouldn't qualify for this. You have to be able to show to meet the qualifications. I just asked you a question.

Laura Ingraham (13:04)

How do you determine it?

Mike Lawler (13:05)

You have to be able to meet the qualifications of the program and that means what is the qualification of Homeland Security is going to deter? They are going to make the determination as they always have rules based on the current structure and guidelines that are in place. You have to be in the country for more than five years. You cannot have committed a crime. You cannot collect government benefits.

Laura Ingraham (13:27)

Okay, that's false.

Mike Lawler (13:28)

You have to pay a fine. You must pay back taxes. It's not false, Laura. You must pay back taxes, Congressman, and you must be employed. Those are the terms. Here's the thing, those are the terms.

Laura Ingraham (13:39)

Congressman, you know how much I like you, but you can't come on this show and say to my audience that you can, you can, you can't have committed a crime to be eligible under the, quote, dignity act because there are several crimes that are, quote, non violent that do not qualify for inadmissibility. And on top of that, there are multiple instances including family unity, public interest and just discretion on the part of immigration officers. I can't imagine Democrat immigration officers under a Democrat president in the future was going to hold this strict, you know, we're not going to let any criminals in.

Matt Walsh (14:19)

Laura Ingraham, a television host who hasn't practiced law in a long time, clearly understands the bill far better than the Congressman who co sponsored it. And she's making several important points here. First of all, the bill allows DHS to make the determination of whether the foreigners meet the criteria under the bill. The foreigners don't have to prove anything. Actually, under this bill, if a foreigner simply claims that he meets the criteria, DHS has the ability to sign off on that without any evidence whatsoever. And that's exactly what Democrats will do if they retake control of dhs. And then of course, Lawler simply lies about the bill. He says that you can't qualify for this program if you commit a crime in addition to illegal entry, which is already a crime. But that's contradicted multiple times by the actual bill. And Lawler simply ignores that point, probably because he hasn't even read the bill that he introduced. And if you do read the bill, unlike Mike Lawler, you'll find this paragraph, which is as close as it gets to any kind of verification procedure, quote, background checks. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall use biometric, biographic and other data that the Secretary determines appropriate to conduct security and law enforcement background checks and determine whether there is any criminal, national security or other factor that would render the alien ineligible for adjustment of status under this division on either a conditional or permanent basis. So in other words, Salazar and Lawler have no idea what DHS will do or won't do. They want the Secretary of Homeland Security to just figure it out on a case by case basis. We're talking about millions of people who are going to be making claims under this law. And DHS now has to spend its time figuring out when exactly all of these people arrived in the United States. How's that going to work? No one knows. Recently, Salazar sat down for an interview with Dennis Michael lynch on his podcast, and he asked her point blank to describe the process here. And she didn't have an answer. Something of a pattern, as you may be noticing. The people behind this bill are incapable of defending it or even explaining how any of it will work. Watch.

Dennis Michael Lynch (16:27)

But I want to know how it is and who it is that is going to process these background checks on 7 teen million people.

Maria Salazar (16:37)

Homeland Security.

Dennis Michael Lynch (16:38)

Have you talked about how long this is going to take? How long does it take to process 17 million people when I've got, let's even just say, 50,000 ICE agents specializing in nothing other than the Dignity Act?

Maria Salazar (16:52)

Look, I cannot tell you specifically how DHS is going to manage this, but we have. We give them 18 months to do

Dennis Michael Lynch (17:00)

it in 18 months. We cannot process 18 million people. That would be 33,000 people a day if we were working weekends and if every single person was getting a adequate check.

Maria Salazar (17:13)

But you're concentrating on the administrative part and then.

Dennis Michael Lynch (17:16)

No, I'm concentrating on the backroom background check. I am not going to be cool with giving somebody dignity when I don't know who that person is and why they're in my country.

Maria Salazar (17:27)

Oh, no, no, no. I agree with you, but that's why I say no more. More than five years. You need to prove that you've been here for more than five.

Dennis Michael Lynch (17:34)

I still need to know who you are, though, Congresswoman.

Maria Salazar (17:37)

Of course, of course that. I need you to know that you're a Pepe Pedro. Of course, I understand. Yes.

Matt Walsh (17:44)

So he spotted her. Quite a few ICE agents there. He said, for the sake of argument, that ICE allocates 50,000 agents to these background checks. That's more than double the number of agents that ICE currently employs in total. And still the math doesn't work. It's simply impossible. And of course, we all know that these background checks aren't even going to attempt to validate the age of these illegal. Illegal aliens when they enter the country. At most, they're going to find crimes that pop up in background checks. So really, the background checks are useless from several different angles. As the, as the interviewer pointed out. And this all also assumes that DHS will be motivated to do do any of this, which if it's under a Democrat administration, they just won't do any of it or even try. Now in response, Salazar dismisses his argument as an administrative concern. But it's actually a very important issue because if you read further on in the bill, you'll learn what happens if the federal government can't process your claim in time. Quote, limitation on removal. An alien who appears to be prima facie eligible for status under the subtitle during the 24 month period following the date of enactment of this act may not be removed or fined based on their immigration status one during such period and two in the case that the alien applies for status under this subtitle until a final decision establishing ineligibility for for such status is rendered. You got that? So if you apply for protection under the Dignid act, then you've stopped the clock on deportation. If the federal government takes five years to process your background check, then you bought yourself five years of free residency in the U.S. we can't deport you, we can't even find you. So yes, Maria, the administrative concerns are actually really important. And you know that this is your attempt to backdoor a mass amnesty. And again, keep in mind, even if a background check is conducted, there's no way for DHS to verify anyone's precise age when they enter this country. The whole process is nonsense and fruitless from the start. And the process gets even harder to enforce when you read the definitions section of the bill. Turns out that if these so called dreamers can't meet the physical presence requirement because they've already been deported, then they can get a waiver, quote, waiver of physical presence with respect to aliens who were removed or deported or departed the United States on or after January 20, 2017 and who were continuously physically present in the United States for at least five years prior to such removal or departure. The Secretary may, as a matter of discretion, waive the physical presence requirement for humanitarian purposes or family unity or because a waiver is otherwise in the public interest. So yes, this law would allow the federal government because it's actually, it's, it's worse than mass amnesty. It's actually worse than it. So what it allows the government to do is undeport illegal aliens. Think about how many millions of people this would cover. If somebody claims that they were lawfully deported or removed from the United States in 2018 or anytime after that, we have to let them back into the country under this bill. And then, and then this whole process plays out and they just get to hang out here until the process is completed. A process that can never really be completed because you can't prove any of this stuff. I mean, it's one of the most insane provisions of any legislation that you will ever see. If this passes and a Democrat becomes President, this country will collapse almost immediately solely because of this one provision, never mind all the rest. But the legislation somehow gets even worse when you go for, go from the DREAM act section to the Dignidad act section, which is section 202301. This is Salazar's real invention. This is where she truly enacts the mass amnesty that she's actually looking for. And once again, this section is reliant on the same background checks that won't actually be possible to perform. But here's where we expand the pool far beyond the so called dreamers. In particular, with this section, Salazar grants preliminary dignity status or dignified status to any alien who, quote, has been continually physically present in the United States since December 30, 2020, who is, quote, not inadmissible under section 212 of the Immigration Nationality act, except that paragraph nine shall not apply for purposes of this section and who quote, has included a restitution payment of at least a thousand dollars to be deposited in the H1B non immigrant petitioner account. The alien must also, quote, submit biometric and biographic data in accordance with procedures established by the Secretary. And then there's another background check. So in other words, sifting through all the, all the bureaucratic language, even if you illegally entered into the country as an adult, you're still eligible for dignity status as long as you pay a thousand dollars a year and as long as you've been present in the United States for five years or more, which can't be proven, she's waiving the provisions of the Immigration Nationality act that bar illegal aliens from re entering the country after they've been here illegally for some time. And she's opening the floodgates about as much as she possibly can. After seven years of this preliminary dignity status, you become a full member with full legal status in the country. The only way to be disqualified under this program is to commit a felony or two or more misdemeanors, excluding marijuana possession, disorderly conduct or disobedience. So those are not included. So you can still participate in BLM riots. But if you're an illegal alien who's committed a bunch of additional crimes, don't worry because for humanitarian reasons, quote unquote, the federal government can waive all of these provisions. And obviously a Democrat administration will do exactly that. There's one other provision which states that for these seven years, in addition to paying $1,000 a year, aliens have to, quote, remain for a period of not less than four years during their participation in the Dignity program, employed, including self employment and serving as a caregiver or enrolled in a course of study at an institute of higher education. Well, this obviously is not going to disqualify anyone. And it's written that way. It's not hard to claim to be self employed or to claim that you're a caregiver or to enroll in some fake school. This kind of fraud is so common that influencers are posting videos in California instructing people how to run exactly this scam.

California Caregiver Influencer (24:38)

Watch, son, I can't afford to pay for an expensive nursing home. Don't worry about it. I just quit my job. Why would you do that? Because I'm gonna take care of you at home and I'll get paid for it. I'm not gonna pay you to take care of me. Don't worry. The government is gonna pay me, not you.

Matt Walsh (24:54)

What do you mean?

California Caregiver Influencer (24:55)

The government will pay me to be your full time caretaker. And in California it's called ihss. How does it work? The program works by giving the person power to hire a caregiver of their choice. So you can choose a family member like me. So how much are you going to get paid? Every state is different. For example, in New York you can make up to 72,000. In California, roughly 63,000. But the average across most states is closer to 50,000.

Matt Walsh (25:20)

As City Journal just reported, quote, California's fraud ridden in. Home Supportive Services pays 807,906 residents up to $6,000 a month to chill at home. Caregiver growth is a parabolic equal to 41% of net jobs growth since Newsom took office. No wonder he wants to grow it another 10% this year to $33.4 billion. So I'm willing to bet that if this horrific law ever passes, there won't be a single foreigner who's disqualified under the employment provision. If it happens, it's going to be the, the. It has to be the laziest person in the history of foreign migration because it's never been easier to lie about your job or working a job or to just say I'm a caregiver in exchange for taxpayer money. So that's it. Those are the sum total of the requirements. If you came into this country illegally as an adult and you aren't willing to lie about being a child when you did so then even then all you got to do is pay a thousand dollars and come up with some kind of fake job or enroll in a fake school and try to avoid committing too many crimes. And after seven years of this, where you pay $7,000 per year, which is not much more than the average American pays per year on streaming services, you're awarded with quote, a lawful status as a non immigrant, authorization for employment and the ability to re enter the United States any number of times. And then as Salazar herself has said, all you got to do is wait for another legislature to come along and pass a full on pathway to citizenship. Watch.

Maria Salazar (27:02)

We give them dignity. At some point in the future another legislator will write another law to give them path to citizenship. Right now what we need to do is to to buy peace for these people. Allow them to stay to continue working because they are needed. You see what I'm trying to do is to bring some common sense, which is the least common of all senses to this conversation. The economy needs them. They do not have a criminal record. They have not gone into trouble. They have been here for a long time. They have roots in the country. Let them stay. Don't give them any type of federal programs and allow them to pay taxes has helped the Social Security fund and let them stay and contribute with the economy with no criminal record. What is wrong with that? We need them.

Matt Walsh (27:47)

We need to buy peace for these people. According to Salazar, who incidentally has spent a decent amount of time at the wef. You know, it sounds a lot like a threat. Sounds like she's saying that unless we appease all these foreigners, they won't be peaceful. Instead they, they'll get really agitated about the, the fact that as criminals they might one day suffer consequences for their actions and we wouldn't want that. It's kind of like when the mafia shows up at your business and offers you protection for a fee with the unspoken understanding that the thing that you need protection from is them. So to keep all these foreigners happy, the law mandates the creation of a so called humanitarian campus. Multiple of them, a lot of them at high volume border checkpoints. According to the bill, quote unquote, aliens in a humanitarian campus shall have access to legal counsel in accordance with section 292 of the immigration and Nationality act, including the opportunity to consult with counsel before any legally determinative aspect of the asylum process occurs. So they get taxpayer funded lawyers to coach them on how to manipulate the system and submit fraudulent asylum claims. And those lawyers in turn get free legal education, which you're also paying for. Quoting again from the bill, loan forgiveness authorized. The Secretary in a coordination with the Secretary of Education shall forgive the qualified loan amount of a borrower who has completed not less than four years of full time employment as an attorney providing legal services at a humanitarian campus. So they want to give free lawyers to illegal immigrants and then, and you pay for that and then force you to pay for the college education for the lawyers too. This really is one of the biggest middle fingers that they could have put in the bill. We know Salazar didn't write this. It's arguable whether she's capable of writing anything, particularly in English. Her friends at the WEF probably did. But even with that in mind, it's truly extraordinary. Not only do we have to allow tens of millions of foreigners into the country, including foreigners who've already been deported. On top of that we need to pay for their lawyers and then we have to pay for the lawyers law school bills. What are the downstream consequences of legislation like this? Like what happens when we flood the market with tens of millions of new workers? Well, as Dennis Michael lynch pointed out there, there really is no good outcome here. It doesn't matter if these people are productive workers or not. Even though we all know most of them won't be anywhere close to productive either way. Americans get screwed over. Watch.

Dennis Michael Lynch (30:26)

I got, so now I got Jose, who was poor to begin with, doesn't have any money saved. Jose doesn't have a job. He's lingering around for 30 days. And now what you're saying is he

Maria Salazar (30:36)

doesn't have a job. Then we smoked him out.

Dennis Michael Lynch (30:39)

We smoked him out.

Maria Salazar (30:40)

He's out if he dispute he has the dignity in him. He just needs to go find a job. He doesn't find a job, I'll find them.

Matt Walsh (30:46)

Then I don't know.

Dennis Michael Lynch (30:48)

Then he has to go home. He gets no other perk. Your math doesn't work for the sense that if you're going to now tell them they have to pay their taxes, they're automatically going to be lifted to a new salary. And now what's going to wind up happening is they're going to find the same problem that my kids got. I got to pay taxes, dad. I got to pay this, I got to pay that. I can't find an apartment. Apartments are $3,000 a month for two bedroom shithole. I, I can't do it.

Leah Gazen (31:12)

Why do they have to put.

Maria Salazar (31:13)

That's their responsibility, not mine.

Dennis Michael Lynch (31:16)

But wait a second.

Maria Salazar (31:17)

You can have two jobs or three jobs. I mean it's like that's the average American person problem.

Dennis Michael Lynch (31:23)

I'm Maria. And what winds up happening now is you are legalizing these people to work to go into more competition against American workers.

Matt Walsh (31:34)

Now for Salazar, it's no big deal if Americans have to work several jobs just to make ends meet. That's the reality in the new global economy. And, and she wants to double down on it. And in particular her bill would allow for a lot more foreign migration from specific countries. This is from a section 3202 quote per country caps raised. Section 202 of the Immigration Nationality act is amended by striking 7% and inserting 15%. That's just one line in the bill. But it has massive implications. Right now no single country can account for more than 7% of all employment based and family based green cards. That's a big problem for Indian and Chinese workers where there's a big backlog currently. So if she raises the cap to 15%, well then the total demographic transformation will accelerate in this country beyond the point where it can ever be stopped or reversed. And, and what Salazar wants to do with this legislation is exactly that. Afford the next Democrat administration with every necessary tool to completely destroy what's left of America. That's why Salazar's handlers at the WEF are particularly pleased with section 3112 which reads as follows. In the case of an alien who is the spouse or child of a citizen of the United States, the Attorney General may subject to clause terminate any appro removal proceedings against the alien, decline to order the alien removed from the United States, grant the alien permission to reapply for re admission to the United States or subject to clause three, waive the application of one or more grounds of inadmissibility or deportability in connection with any request for relief from removal. Translating all that, if an illegal alien is related to a US Citizen, the next Merrick Garland can allow that illegal alien to remain in the country forever. The rules simply don't apply. And as for the background check that validates that the alien is related to the citizen, well again, it will never happen. Now you might think, well, this is a pretty narrow exception. But the exceptions are all over this bill. As Will Chamberlain pointed out, there are so many exceptions here that Kilmar Obrego Garcia, the alleged wife beater and gang member who's been deported several times after deliberately entering this country illegally at the age of 16 could be granted legal status under this bill. All he'd need to do is enroll in some technical college or fake college and he qualify. That's because although he's accused of domestic violence, he was never convicted. And while police databases say he's in a gang, the law doesn't allow the government to consider that information. Quote, allegations of gang membership obtained from a state or federal in house or local database or a network of databases used for the purpose of recording and sharing activities of alleged gang member activity across law enforcement agencies shall not establish gang participation. It's just a staggering number of exclusions. I mean they really thought of everything. They thought of every possible exception they could jam into this thing to invalidate any of the so called requirements that are being imposed supposedly on illegal aliens in this bill. All of it is tailor made to be abused by the next Democrat administration. That's what all this is for. And of course if you listen to Salazar and the politicians who support this bill, who I'll name in a second, they'll tell you that this is a one time program that's going to fix our broken immigration system forever. We've heard that before. We heard it in the 1960s. We heard it again with Reagan in the 1980s. Watch.

Democratic Politician (35:28)

But it is true our borders are out of control. It is also true that this has been a situation on our borders back through a number of administrations. And I supported this bill. I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and who have lived here even though some time back they may have entered illegally. With regard to the employer sanctions, we must have that not only to ensure that we can identify the illegal aliens, but also while some keep protesting about what it would do to employers, there is another employer that we shouldn't be so concerned about. And these are employers down through the years who have encouraged the illegal entry into this country because they then hire these individuals and hire them as starvation wages and with none of the benefits, benefits that we think are normal and natural for workers in our country. And the individuals can't complain because of their illegal status. We don't think that those people should be allowed to continue operating free. And this was why the provisions that we had in with regard to sanctions and so forth. And I'm going to do everything I can and all of us in the administration are to join in again when Congress is back at it to get an immigration bill that will give us once again control of our borders.

Matt Walsh (36:56)

So we've tried one Time amnesty before it accomplishes nothing other than to destroy our cities and embolden even more foreigners to break our laws and come here. So what every Democrat wants, it's also what the House Republicans supporting this bill are hoping for. Those Republicans, in addition to Salazar, include Lawler in New York, Velato in California, Newhouse in Washington, Kelly in Pennsylvania, Fitzpatrick in Pennsylv, Evans in Colorado, Stutzman in Indiana, Bacon in Nebraska, Kim in California, Diaz, Balart in Florida, Baird in Indiana, Smucker in Pennsylvania, De La Cruz in Texas, LaLota in New York, Dunn in Florida, Kiggins in Virginia, and Nunn in Iowa. Now, I also need to mention that in addition to these Republicans, Donald Trump has endorsed Salazar. He said that she was doing a fantastic job back in February, and this is after she started to advocate for this amnesty bill. He's also endorsed Lawler. Meanwhile, Republicans in Congress are pushing other legislation to expand visa programs and even create new ones, like the Essential Workers for Economic Advancement act, which was introduced by Lloyd Smucker in Pennsylvania. So this is a very strange situation. By any measure, the Republican Party is an open revolt against its own voters. That's what's happening now. You may not have heard much about any of this as the war in Iran is starting and stopping every other day. There's a lot of drama to cover there. And Republicans in the House are aware of that. They're hoping you don't notice any of that. While you. That you know that while you're. You're paying attention to all the bombing, they're on the verge of passing the single most destructive piece of legislation since the 1960s. Do Republican leaders, including the President, actually support this? Will they do anything to stop it? Will they say anything, anything at all, to condemn this legislation and the traitors who support it? And if not, why should anyone vote for a Republican politician ever again? That's a question they would have to answer. If your vote means nothing to them, and they'll even push amnesty through in the most destructive piece of legislation in decades, then what's the point? They need to justify that. And one way they can justify that is by, you know, stomping this piece of legislation down, condemning it and anyone who supported it. But what matters to them, apparently, is ensuring that foreign invaders feel a sense of dignity as they deprive you and your children of a stable, safe, clean American society, which is your birthright. What they're missing is that Congress, especially this particular Congress, has no dignity to dispense. They view the Reagan amnesty not as a grave mistake, which is what it was. But as a blueprint, their constituents are their big donors, along with the millions of foreigners those donors want to hire. From their perspective, what you want doesn't actually matter. That's what they think of you. And with the so called Dignidad act, for the first time since the civil rights era, they've put it in writing. Now let's get to our five headlines. The voices of our culture are loud, but the truth is often silent. And that silence has a cause. Right now, women facing unexpected pregnancies are bombarded with pressure and fear before they ever have a chance to pause, breathe or hear the truth about life and hope. That's why I'm standing with our sponsor, Preborn. At every Preborn Network clinic, a woman is welcomed with compassion and given a free ultrasound. In that sacred moment, she sees what she's never seen before, the life within her. There, she's offered something the abortion industry will never give the hope of Jesus Christ and true support. This April, Preborn aims to share that hope in 11,000 gospel conversations across their clinics. You can help make that happen. For just 28 bucks, you can sponsor one ultrasound to a mother in need. $140 provides five. Every dollar saves lives and strengthens truth in a world that too often denies it. The world may shout its lies, but we do not have to be silent about the truth. To donate, dial pound250 and say the keyword baby. That's pound250 baby or visit preborn.comwalsh that's preborn.comwalsh I know what good seafood tastes like and most of what you're buying at the grocery store is not it. And that's where our sponsor, Wild Alaskan Company comes in with high quality wild caught fish that you can trust. My first box had perfectly proportioned sockeye salmon and Pacific halibut individually wrapped, ready to go. It tasted amazing off the grill and you could really taste the the freshness and the quality. Their fish is 100 wild caught, never farmed, so no antibiotics or GMOs. Just clean, real fish that supports healthy oceans and fishing communities. Plus it's frozen right off the boat to lock in the taste, texture and all those Omega threes sustainably sourced from Alaska so you know you're getting the best while feeding your family quality seafood. Not all fish are the same. Get seafood you can trust. Go to wild alaska.com walsh for $35 off your first box of premium wild caught salmon. Wild caught seafood Rather that's wild alaska.com Walsh for $35 off your first order. Thanks to Wild Alaska Company for sponsoring this episode. All right, here's a report from NBC in Charlotte about a case that we've of course been following very closely here on the show. Let's go ahead and play that.

Leah Gazen (43:00)

DeCarlos Brown, the man charged in the death of Irina Zaruska on the Charlotte light rail, has been found incompetent to stand trial. Now, according to court records, his defense has attorney is asking to delay a key hearing in the case. WCNC Charlotte's Jesse Pierre is joining us live outside the Mecklenburg County Courthouse. Jesse, this is a story we have been following very closely for months. What does this mean for the case?

Jesse Pierre (43:27)

Well, a Rule 24 hearing which was set at the end of this month to determine if prosecutors will seek the death penalty in this case has now been pushed back, back as questions about the Carlos Brown's mental capacity take center stage. Decarlos Brown was found incapable to proceed after a court ordered evaluation was done at Central Regional Hospital in Butner, North Carolina. Brown is charged with the murder of Irina Zarutska on the light rail in August of 2025. Brown faces both state and federal murder charges.

Tim Kennedy (44:00)

If the hospital finds that you can't understand the proceedings so you have no idea what's going on and you can't assist your lawyer in providing for your defense, then what they rule is that you are incapable to proceed.

Jesse Pierre (44:17)

Because Brown is currently in federal custody, state proceedings are now on hold. His defense team filed a motion to delay his Rule 24 hearing for 180 days since any efforts to restore his capacity can't happen until he is back in state custody. Attorney Tim Kennedy, not involved in the case, says this does not mean Brown walks away free.

Tim Kennedy (44:38)

We're not going to keep him in the department of adult Corrections or the prisons here in North Carolina. We're going to put him in the mental health system and hopefully over a period of time he does get better. But if not, then he, it's very possible that he spends the rest of his life in these mental health facilities and is never free to leave them.

Matt Walsh (45:05)

So I've ranted about this madness so much, you don't need to hear it again. But you're gonna, you're gonna hear it again. Just abbreviated because first of all, we're assured that he'll be in the mental health facility. He won't be released. But notice how he qualified that. He said it's very possible that he spends the rest of his life in a mental health facility. Very Possible, not certain. Because in fact, as he well knows, it's also very possible that he is released from the facility at some point in the future. And that has happened many times. There have been many cases like that. We've talked about them recently. And even if he stays in there forever, that is also a ridiculous miscarriage of justice. Why does he get to be in a mental health facility? Why do we have to give him treatment like he's a cancer patient for the rest of his life? How is that justice? How is that fair? And what the hell does get better mean? I mean, this is such madness that we talk about psychotic killers and say, well, hopefully he gets better. What are you going to send him a get well soon card? Hey, I heard you're a psychotic killer. Get well soon. Hope you get better. Okay? Becoming a murderer is not like catching the flu, all right? It, it's not like being diagnosed with diabetes. Get better. Is he going to wake up magically tomorrow and not be a psychotic, deranged killer anymore? Is he going to wake up tomorrow and say, oh geez, that was embarrassing, man. Well, I'm a, I'm a functioning member of society now. Hey, can you recommend any accountants? I got to file my taxes. Is that ever going to happen? Ever? All he just what, he needs some talk therapy, Is that it? Just sit down, have some conversations with a 34 year old white woman with a social worker degree. That'll fix it. I mean, that's really what these people think. These people think that a homicidal lunatic can be fixed, can be made better with a combination of medicine and heart to heart conversations. That's what they think. You know, they think the whole world is like goodwill hunting or something. You just need a psychiatrist like Robin Williams that will sit down and is really wise and world weary and can really get to the bottom of what, what's going on with you and you'll have a big breakthrough and they'll cry and hug and the Carlos Brown will say, oh, you're right, I've realized that I shouldn't murder random people anymore. Now you see, the problem with the Carlos Brown is that a, he's very low iq, a lot of what we call crazy these days, or we say someone's incompetent, someone is deranged or whatever, or they have poor mental health. Very often what we're describing is someone who's extremely low iq. That's what we're actually talking about. And so that's problem number one. And problem number two is that he's A barbaric monster. Neither one of those things can be fixed with pills or with therapy at all. There is no therapeutic strategy that will ever do anything at all to even slightly address either of the problems I just mentioned. There is only one solution for people like this. The solution is found at the end of a rope. That's the solution. Legally. I'm talking about arrest, convict, legally, and then through the proper channels, by proper legal authorities, according to the law, kill him, execute him. That's the only solution. There is no other. As I've said so many times, if you are too incompetent to understand that you shouldn't butcher an innocent woman on the train, then you have lost your right to participate in human society in any capacity. You have lost your right to live. The right to life is conditional. It is not permanent necessarily. It is. It is not something that exists unconditionally for your entire life. You can lose that right.

Jesse Pierre (49:54)

You.

Matt Walsh (49:54)

You knife a young woman in the neck on the train. You just. You don't have the right to live anymore. That right is gone. So arrest, convict, execute. You're not fit to be a part of civilization. If you did it on purpose and you did it knowing what you were doing, and, and, well, then you're unspeakably evil and you're not fit to be a part of civilization. The, the solution then is execution. But if you really don't understand, like, if it needs to be explained to you that you can't do that, and even then you still don't understand, well, then you're. If anything, you're even less fit to be a part of civilization. How many more innocent people must we sacrifice for the sake of coddling and babying the absolute scum of the earth? How many more people must we trade? How many more innocent, functioning, promising, bright young people must we trade for the worst humans on the planet? For the kinds of humans who have never contributed anything to society and never will, have only ever taken, have only ever harmed, never done anything but that and never will

Maria Salazar (51:14)

know.

Matt Walsh (51:14)

Our ancestors had it right. When it comes to law and order, when it comes to criminal justice, they had it right because they would have had this guy hanging from the gallows about an hour after conviction. He'd already be convicted and he'd already be dead. And he'd be buried somewhere in an unmarked grave. Nobody would remember his name. Nobody would mourn him. There's no one in his life who loves him or cares about him. And so he would just be dead. And that system of justice is Light years better than this insane nonsense that we're dealing with now. As you've noticed, if you've listened to the show, I am totally radicalized when it comes to the. The issue of criminal justice. I've always been. By most standards, I've always been pretty radical, or at least I have been for a long time. At this point. I'm completely radicalized on it, like, totally. And I'm not speaking hyperbolic at all about any of this. We should increase executions by like 10,000%. Bring back hard labor, bring back corporal punishment, bring back public lashings, bring back public hangings. Our ancestors were right about all of that. They weren't right about everything. They were people. They were fallible. They were right about some really fundamental things that we have since become confused about. And this is one of them. Their attitude was, oh, you killed an innocent person. Well, you're just going to die. That's it. Like, what is there to talk about? Of course. Of course you're going to die for that. What else are we going to do? Keep you alive? Why, why even do that? I mean, this idea now that, that, that it's. It's cruel and unusual to intentionally inflict any physical suffering on evil people who've been convicted of a crime. Total nonsense. Why is that wrong? I mean, I know these are things people don't want to talk about. What, a lot of the stuff that we would call torture these days. Why, why is that wrong, necessarily? Why would it be wrong with someone like this to intentionally inflict physical suffering on him as a form of punishment? Would that be wrong? What's wrong about it? It's punishment. Is it wrong because it makes him suffer? Well, that's a. It's a punishment. It's supposed to. That's the point. All punishment is the intentional infliction of suffering on someone because they deserve it. That's what all punishment is. We, we. We got this idea that, that, well, no, you can't do that. Well, no, we can't make them suffer. Why, of course we should. Of course that's what they deserve. But the problem is we let communists, we let psychiatrists, we let academics. I repeat myself. You know, all these things are all interchangeable. Take over the justice system. It's one of the worst things we ever did. That's why, as well as being radicalized on the issue of criminal justice, I'm totally radicalized and have been for a long time about the psychiatric industry, which I think is a blight on the earth. I think for sure humanity is in a much better spot if none of that ever existed, if the entire psychiatric field just never existed. Maybe there have been some worthwhile breakthroughs here and there, but it's been so much utter, total horseshit. The worst kind, the most deranged nonsense coming from these people. Godless pervert heathens who reject natural law and the very concept of justice want to medicalize everything. Everything a person does is just a medical issue. Everything's a matter of treatment. This is what we get from the psychiatric industry. Need to get all these freaks out of the system, reject everything they say on the topic of crime and punishment, everything, and get back to arresting evil people and making them suffer for their crimes. We here in the Matt Walsh show believe it's important to stay healthy and one of the most essential components to your overall health is having a healthy liver. Your liver is your body's ultimate filter works overtime processing everything you consume While juggling over 500 daily functions like energy production, digestion and more. When it gets overworked though, you really feel it. That's where our sponsor Dose for your Liver comes in. Dose is a clinically backed supplement that comes as a daily 2 ounce shot. Helps cleanse your liver of unwanted stressors that are slowing it down and supports your daily liver function so everything can run smoothly. And as a bonus, it actually tastes good, like fresh squeezed orange juice, not some chalky pill you have to choke down. Ready to give your liver the support it deserves. Head to dosedaily.co walsh or enter Walsh to get 35 off your first subscription. Your body does so much for you. Let's do something for it that's D O S E D A I L Y Co Walsh for 35% off your first month subscription. Starting something new can be daunting. When we launched the Matt Walsh show, we had all the usual fears, but it worked out well and it's possible for others to using our sponsor Shopify. Shopify is the commerce platform powering millions of businesses around the world and 10% of all e commerce in the US including our very own daily wire shop. Getting started is incredibly easy. With hundreds of ready to use templates, you can build a beautiful online store that matches your brand's style. Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that write product descriptions, page headlines and even enhance your product photography so you can accelerate your efficiency whether you're uploading new products or improving existing ones. Need to get the word out? Shopify helps you find your customers with easy to run email and social media campaigns. While what's more. You can tackle all those important tasks in one place, from inventory to payments to analytics, without juggling multiple websites or platforms. And if you ever get stuck, Shopify is 24. 7. Customer support is always around to help. It's time to turn those what ifs into with Shopify today. Sign up for your $1 per month trial today at shopify.comwalsh go to shopify.comwalsh that's shopify.comwalsh all right, get ready for this. Get ready for some wokeness, the purest variety. Canadian wokeness. Canadian female minority wokeness. This is the good stuff. Okay? This is the pure. This is the purest stuff on the market. So here's Leah Gazen, who's a Canadian politician of some kind, complaining about a budget proposal or something. I don't know, bud. But the reason for the complaint, well, I mean, you just have to hear it yourself.

Leah Gazen (58:22)

Listen, when the budget was released, I was shocked to find out that Prime Minister Carney is cutting $7 billion between Indigenous Services Canada and Crown Indigenous Relations. They provided $0 to deal with the ongoing genocide of MMIW G2SLGBTQIA. This is abhorrent. This is callous. This is callous because the very liberal government that has stripped organizations of life sustaining funding has now promised, committed $13 billion. $13 billion on military spending.

Matt Walsh (59:08)

So, yeah, let's just pause it there. And I don't know if you caught that. There is a genocide of. I had to write it down. MMI, WG2SL, GBT, QQIA plus people MMI, GSG2S, LGBTQIA plus otherwise known as your Gmail password. Not even, like, that's not even your Gmail password. It's too good, you'll forget it. That's the password that you forget and you have to reset the password. That's like the WI fi path. You go to someone's house, you ask for their WI FI password. It's something like this. Wait, it's way too. That's. No one's really trying to hack into your WI fi. It doesn't need to be that secure. It really doesn't. MMI, WG2SL GBT QQIA Plus. Not a joke, by the way. I mean, it is a joke, unintentionally, but she did not intend that in a satirical way whatsoever. She did it with a total straight face from memory, I think, which is impressive and also pretty sad. Think about the. The mental real estate that these people devote to just remembering the latest buzzwords and labels for their preferred victim. Groups. Think about how much, think about how much time and energy mentally is spent on that. The memory, the recall is amazing, actually. I mean, imagine if it was devoted to, to something that isn't total asinine nonsense. I mean, like the, the, the autistic obsessive ability to rattle off random let letters from memory that this woman has. She could be cracking codes, she could be deciphering encrypted messages or whatever. Instead, she's doing this. That's sad. But it's for a good cause. It's for a good cause. It's for the cause of speaking out against genocide. The genocide of MMI, WG2SL, GBT, QQIA plus people, which, of course is not happening at all. How could it. I mean, I could not genocide mmi, wg2sl, gbt, qqi plus people even if I wanted to. I'm not saying I want to, but I would. Who could. I wouldn't be able to remember who they are. Like, if I was a fascist dictator, let's just say. And I said, all right, time to get to let's do some genocide. And, you know, someone come up and said, and said, oh, you know, well, I got an idea. We could genocide the MMI, WG2SL, GBT, QQI plus people. I would say, who, which ones are those? And then we gotta get out the flowcharts and Venn diagrams and an algebra textbook. You just get totally lost and bored with the whole thing. Now, in case you're wondering, I did Google it. I googled MMI, WG2SL, GBT, QQIA plus, and, and I googled it, and Google actually came back and said that it had alerted 911 that I was having a stroke. So that was the whole thing. But after I dealt with all that, and then I, I, I got the definition of what this vomitous scroll of letters means. Here. Here's what it means, okay? Missing and murdered indigenous women, girls, and two spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, intersex and asexual plus people. So they've added murdered people to the LGBT acronym. Basically, not all murdered people, just indigenous ones, especially women. Although these people don't think women actually exist. But let's put that to the side. Let's also put to the side that, by the way, like, 100% of the missing and murdered indigenous women were murdered or made missing by other indigenous people. Okay? So, so, you know, basically all of them. But let's forget about that for now. And let's even forget the fact that she's Claiming a genocide, which is totally fictional and made up, but it's a genocide against this group. And the group includes people who've already been murdered. How could murdered people. So if you're a murdered person right now, means you've already been murdered. Right? So if I'm conducting a genocide, how can you be the victim of it? You're already dead. Like, genociding the murdered population is a bit redundant, isn't it? Talk about insult injury. First you're murdered, then you get genocided, and you're like, dude, I've already been. I'm already murdered. Then they say, well, now you're getting genocided, okay? And then you become gay on top of it. I mean, this is horrible. The fate of these people murdered, genocided, and then made gay. Because that's what they're doing. I mean, that's the thing I really want to focus on here, that they. They're lumping murdered people into the LGBT Alphabet soup. They've turned murdered into a sexual orientation. So now that's like a thing I, you know, is someone said, I identify as gay, I identify as trans, I identify as bisexual. Oh, hi. I identify as murdered. Yeah, I identify as a murdered person. Actually, My pronouns are was. And think about how unfair this is to those murdered people. Again, you've already been murdered. Like, you've been murdered. You got enough problems as it is. Let's be real about it. And now you're gay on top of it. They just lumped you in with the G. With. With. You didn't consent to that. Imagine how embarrassing that is for the murdered people who show up in the afterlife. And, and they don't know about any of this. You know, people are kind of pointing and smirking a little bit, and they're saying, the guy's gay. How do you know he's gay? He was murdered. I mean, they say, well, I'm gay now. And God says, yeah, you're gay. And you say, come on, this is ridiculous. And he says, well, you're sounding pretty gay right now. So anyway, that's how it works. I. I'm just. Look, I'm. I'm just trying to sort through it. I'm trying to figure out. I'm not even saying that this is wrong. I. I don't know. Is every person who, who gets murdered gay? Is that how you know these are metaphysical questions? I. I can't say for sure. I'm skeptical. So, anyway, that's how it works. And so, you know, we, we talk about. Is wokeness dead? Well, I think this solves the. The mystery. The wokeness is dead, but it was murdered. And then it became even gayer. And now. And now that's what we're. We're dealing with. So. All right, I think, you know what, we'll just leave it there. Actually had a whole other thing I wanted to talk about, but I don't think I can. I can't really. How do you transition? How do you transition? I don't know. In Canada, it's really easy to transition. They transition anyone, but I don't know how you transition from one topic to the next. So I'll do it for me for this week and next week. Actually, I'm on vacation. Next week we'll have. We will have some great content. We'll be putting out through the next week. So we've got some stuff in the pipeline we'll be putting out, but it won't be another show until the week after that. So until then, thanks for watching, thanks for listening and Godspeed.

Democratic Politician (67:23)

I do believe that if people have committed treason against the United States of

Laura Ingraham (67:28)

America, their statutes should not be in the country.

Matt Walsh (67:33)

History is written by the victors, and since the 1960s, we've been told mostly by people whose ancestors didn't even live here. During the war, the south committed treason. But if the Confederates were traitors, then why was Jefferson Davis never put on trial for treason? What were Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson afraid of? Did they know something they're not allowed to say? Today, it's time for the truth. So here it is. Robert E. Lee was a military genius and a man of immense honor. He was beloved by Americans from the north and south for a century after the war. This is the real history of the Civil War. Have you ever thought of just how much you really have to keep track of on the daily? You've got 12 different passwords, your kids, sports schedules, a grocery list that never stops growing, among many other things. But for all the stuff we managed to remember, we often forget something much bigger. What happens to our families financially if something happens to us? The responsibility of protecting your loved ones and planning for the future is heavy. Trying to navigate life insurance on your own can be a Mess. Our sponsor, PolicyGenius, makes the process dramatically easier by acting as an online insurance marketplace, not an insurance company. So you can compare quotes from some of America's top insurers side by side for free. Actually understand what you're buying. Their license team works for you, not for the insurance carrier. So they care about your needs, your budget, your family they help you figure out coverage amounts, prices and terms so there's no guesswork. PolicyGenius will help answer your questions, handle paperwork, and advocate for you throughout the process, which is why they've racked up the thousands of five star reviews on Google and trustpilot. Protect your family with a policy that grows with your life. With Policygenius, you can see if you can find 20 year life insurance policies starting at just $276 a year for just a million dollars in coverage. Head to policygenius.com Walsh to compare life insurance quotes from top companies and see how much you could save. That's policygenius.com Walsh.