Loading summary
Transcript5 lines
- [00:00]
A
Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile with a message for everyone paying Big Wireless way too much. Please, for the love of everything good in this world, stop with Mint. You can get premium wireless for just $15 a month. Of course, if you enjoy overpaying, no judgments. But that's weird. Okay, one judgment anyway. Give it a try@mintmobile.com Switch upfront payment of $45 for three month plan equivalent to $15 per month required intro rate first three months only, then full price plan options available, taxes and fees extra. See full terms@mintmobile.com in the past few days, millions of people in Britain have realized, many of them for the first time, that their government is willing to go to extreme lengths to cover up a murder as long as that murder involves a white man. And to this day, British authorities are hiding critical evidence involving the murder of 18 year old college student Henry Novak. No member of the public, not even the jury that just convicted Novak's murderer, a foreigner named Vikram Digua, has seen the photos and cell phone videos Digua took in which he chased Novak down and mocked him as he died a slow and horrific death. You're not going to get away with this, big man, digua said as Novak struggled to breathe. Dig also said, you're not dying bro, and you were recording me thinking you're sick, meaning tough. The judge ruled that the videos are simply too shocking even for the jury in a murder case. Now, according to the Daily Mail's reporting, quote, this clip was not played in court for being too disturbing to be shown. Yes, too disturbing to be shown. Which suggests that it's somehow even more disturbing than the body cam footage. We're talking about a sadistic execution that's been hidden from the public. And speaking of the body cams, we also don't have the full body cam footage of the police response to the murder. The footage cuts off the moment the authorities finally realize that Novak has gone unconscious more than 60 seconds after they dragged his body across the pavement and handcuffed him and more than 15 minutes after his first stabbed. We were told during the sentencing hearing that officers supposedly reacted with shock when they began performing CPR on Novak. That was supposedly the first time they realized that he had a fatal chest wound, even though he told them he had been stabbed and they didn't believe him. But strangely enough, the police haven't released the full body cam footage of the moment the officers came to that realization. So we have no idea what they said or what they did specifically. Yes, Novak was seriously injured. He ultimately lost around 20% of his total blood volume. But the overall survival rate when that same vein is injured by gunshot or stabbing is around 20%. It's not zero percent. And Novak was stabbed just down the street from a major trauma center. Surgeons at the hospital could have inserted a tube into his chest and pumped out the blood. They could have sealed off the vein. There's a chance they could have saved him. But the authorities didn't transport Novak to the trauma hospital at any point. Instead they arrested him, handcuffed him and waited for the ambulance to come. And then he died. Could the surgeons have saved Henry Novak's life? Well, we obviously don't know the answer to that question. But given all the deception, Britons have no reason to trust the government's pathologist in the case who insisted that Novak would have died. No, no matter what. Regardless of what the police did, the government didn't even try to save Novak. Instead, they engaged in a cover up which continues as we speak. Now, in that respect and many other respects, the slaughter of Henry Novak bears more than a passing resemblance to the execution of 17 year old white high school junior Austin Metcalf at a track meet last year in Frisco, Texas. Yesterday marked the first day of testimony in the trial of Carmelo Anthony, who killed Metcalfe and who still managed to graduate from Centennial High School thanks to the local school district, which should be disbanded immediately. Based on the trial so far, it's clear that we still haven't gotten anything close to the truth about this case. Once again, as we've seen so many times, the official narrative which we all took for granted over the past year is falling apart. And now that witnesses are testifying and evidence is being introduced, many of these lies are are finally being exposed. The judge has banned audio or video recordings from the trial, but because a small number of reporters are in the courtroom, the truth is getting out in some capacity at least. So we'll start with the revelation that according to prosecutors, Carmelo Anthony lied to investigators during questioning after the killing. Now already we knew that Carmelo Anthony asked police officers whether he could possibly have a valid self defense claim, which is a really good indication that he doesn't have a valid self defense defense claim. We also know that he threw the knife into the stands as a way of trying to hide the murder weapon. Clumsily, we know he told a police officer, it's not alleged I did it when the officer mentioned the stabbing. So at the risk of understatement, Carmelo Anthony's behavior for a long time has strongly suggested that he was aware he committed murder. But at least his response, as incriminating as they were as it was, seemed relatively truthful as far as we knew. And now we learned that, in fact, some of his responses were not honest at all. This is a quote from NBC in Dallas, which had a reporter in courtroom, and it says, quote, prosecutor Bill Worsky continued his opening statement saying that Carmelo Anthony lied to investigators when he said he told Austin Metcalfe not to touch him. He knows what he did. He knows he provoked the murder, wirski said. And that lie tells you all you need to know about his mindset that day. You simply cannot provoke someone, and when they push, you take their life, prosecutor said. Now, later on, the same prosecutor stated, according to witnesses, that Carmelo Anthony did say to Austin Metcalf, touch me and see what happens. So, in other words, Anthony went into the tent that was reserved for Austin Metcalf's team. And then when Metcalf told Anthony to leave, which he had every right to tell him to leave, Anthony responded by daring Metcalfe to physically move him from the tent, along with a thinly veiled threat. Anthony also reached into his bag as if he was going to produce a weapon, which Metcalf and all the witnesses in the tent thought was a bluff. That's evidently very different from the version of events that Anthony presented to investigators in which Anthony was just minding his own business, telling Metcalf not to touch him, and then Metcalf grabbed him for no reason. In reality, Anthony was belligerent. He was looking for an opportunity to use the illegal flip knife that he was carrying, which he knew was a prohibited item. Rather than simply leaving the tent, which he could have done, he began reaching into his bag for the knife. And before long, he dared Austin Metcalf to make physical contact, presumably so that he could have a pretext to murder him, which he did. Now, we also learned during yesterday's opening statements that after Anthony stabbed Metcalf, coaches working for Metcalf School had to chase Anthony down and detain him. The prosecutor stated that Anthony tried to exit the stadium after disposing of the knife. But as Anthony fled, Austin Metcalf's twin brother, Hunter, lifted Austin's shirt and saw a gaping hole in his chest. And at that point, bystanders pointed out Anthony as he was running away, and some of the coaches ran after him. This was when a student named Hudson Dean told an athletic trainer that he saw Carmelo Anthony throwing a knife into the stands. And meanwhile, A coach named Joshua Redman, who stayed with Metcalf, recognized immediately that he was going to die. Redman had military training and said Metcalfe was making very labored breaths, indicating that his brain was running out of oxygen. Metcalfe lost his pulse before the ambulance arrived on the scene. According to NBC, Anthony fled the scene and tried to exit through the front gate. He attempted to blend in with the crowd, which was rushing out of the tent, but he didn't get far because, quote, several coaches stopped him before he made it to the exit. In particular, coach Robert Starr, who worked as a head track coach at Metcalf School, testified that he hopped over a gate and approached Anthony and stopped him. So Carmelo Anthony was trying to leave the scene. There's no question about that. Now, contrast this behavior with, say, Kyle Rittenhouse or Daniel Penny or George Zimmerman or Richard or Rick Chow, who we talked about earlier in the week, or anyone else who engaged in lawful self defense and who the left tried to send to prison for the rest of their lives. None of these people attempted to flee after they eliminated the threat. Kyle Rittenhouse walked towards the police in Kenosha. Daniel Penny remained on the subway platform. George Zimmerman didn't move an inch from the pavement where Trayvon Martin tried to smash his head into a pulp. Rick Chow stayed at his gas station, voluntarily provided a comprehensive statement to police the moment they arrived. Not that it really needs to be spelled out, but in general, innocent people don't flee the scene after they defend themselves. You know, they don't try to hide the murder weapon. They don't lie to investigators about what they were doing. There's another major element of this trial that until now has been minimized and downplayed by the media. It's the surveillance video showing parts of the altercation from a distance. This is footage that hasn't been released to the public. The authorities are hiding it, just like the British government is hiding several of the videos involving the murder of Henry Novak. But as we discussed, a small number of news outlets had been allowed to see the video and to describe it to their audience. In every case, the outlets have said it's useless. They told us for an entire year that, you know, there's nothing interesting about the footage. Now you can't see anything, anything in it, but that's the case. It's very odd that the prosecution made the video a centerpiece of their opening argument, as well as the first testimony that a jury heard. Jurors watching two versions of the footage, the raw video and A version that was enhanced. And then prosecutors question of video forensic expert who works with the DA's office about the footage. The entire tape lasted for 15 minutes and 20 seconds. And it begins with the Metcalfe brothers entering the stadium. Now, at the 3 minute 24 second, Mark Anthony enters the stadium. At 7 minutes and 57 seconds into the video, the forensic expert says that people started paying attention to what was happening under the tent. One person appears to push another person underneath the tent. The physical confrontation lasts a couple seconds and then there's a flurry of movement. And as described by an NBC reporter in the courtroom, Anthony, quote, exit the bleachers at the top of the tent, goes onto the walkway, down a ramp and into the parking lot. Appears to alternate between running and walking throughout. Now, as Anthony exits the bleachers, someone is pointing at him. And at 12 minutes and 30 seconds, Anthony is being escorted out by the police. Now, from these descriptions which were provided by reporters who could barely see it since the TV wasn't angled towards them, we can conclude that indeed the video footage is highly relevant evidence. It's not worthless as every media outlet claimed. Instead, to the contrary, the footage is strong evidence of Anthony's guilt. Now, first of all, if Anthony had truly acted in self defense and neutralized a dangerous threat, there would be no reason for everyone to run out of the tent in a panic and to point towards Anthony so that the coaches and police could apprehend him. When Daniel Penny neutralized the violent homeless schizophrenic on the train, people didn't run out of the subway car and tell the police to arrest him. Instead, they helped Penny restrain the vagrant and they were relieved when he took care of business. So the fact this tape shows the opposite reaction from bystanders, the fact that it shows how horrified they were by what Anthony did strongly suggests that he committed murder. And the other students were worried that he'd kill them next, like a mass shooter. Also, it's obviously noteworthy that Carmelo Anthony was briefly running as part of this escape. Who was he running from exactly? I mean, it really makes you think. It's also important to point out that one of Austin Metcalfe's classmates, who is black, ran after Carmelo Anthony. Now this is reporting from the Daily Mail, which was also in the courtroom. Quote, new state witness Vincent Cooper, a coach at Frisco isd, is now testifying how he was assigned to manage Carmelo Anthony after the stabbing and stop him from leaving the football stadium. Later, Cooper was asked to calmed down a Teammate of Austin Metcalf who was angry about Austin stabbing. Austin's teammate, who's black, wanted to attack Anthony. He stabbed my brother, the black memorial teammate said of Austin Metcalf. The teammate explained that he was on the football team with Austin and considered him family. This was an immediate reaction for Metcalf's black teammate. His testimony is completely fatal to the left's entire narrative about this case. If he thought Elston Metcalf was attacking Carmelo Anthony because he's black or whatever, then the odds are pretty good this particular individual would not lunge after Anthony and try to avenge his fallen teammate. That's what he did because in the moment he recognized exactly what Carmel Carmelo Anthony had done. Secondly, although it's not clear who did the pushing in the video, it's certainly possible that it was Austin Metcalf. Witnesses said that Metcalfe, as part of his effort to get Carmelo Anthony out of the tent, applied some amount of physical force. But obviously, when you're unarmed and you push somebody without even knocking them over because you're trying to get them to leave a place where they don't belong, you're not using lethal force. The person you push is not allowed to murder you because he can't possibly have a reasonable fear for his life under those circumstances, obviously. And if the attacker is in the wrong team's tent where he's not supposed to be, and he's daring someone to push him and he knows he has a knife and his victim doesn't, there is no viable self defense claim, period. You cannot walk into a place where you don't belong, dare someone to make physical contact with you, knowing you have a knife, knowing they don't have one, and then the moment they do stab them to death. Obviously you can't do that. That is not self defense. Along those lines, one of the most important parts of yesterday's testimony zeroed in on the fact that Anthony was in the wrong tent. Robert Starr, the head track coach, testified that, quote, a tent marks your spot. He said it's a big deal to ensure that other people are kept out of the tent for a variety of reasons, including keeping property safe from theft. He said it's widely understood at these track meets that you're not supposed to go into another team's tent. And additionally, on the day of the stabbing, Coach Star had texted Metcalf telling him and his brother they need to be leaders for the day and to step up and essentially run the tent. They needed to, quote, assist with getting tents off Buses and carrying heavy equipment. Metcalf responded, quote, for sure, Coach got you. And after Metcalf's death, Coach Starr testified that he replied to that message. I love you, man. Sorry I didn't say it enough. Now, the point is, by the broadly accepted standards of the track world, Carmel or the standards of anyone, Carmelo Anthony was trespassing. On cross examination, Carmelo's defense attorneys tried to make the argument that occasionally students will go into other teams tents to chat briefly, especially if they, you know, see someone they know personally. And Coach Starr agreed that in certain situations that does happen. But in this case, Camilla Anthony's lawyers say that he saw someone named Edwin Pera in the Memorial High School tent. Memorials Austin Metcalf School and Paris supposedly is a close, close family friend of Anthony's girlfriend. Carmelo Anthony, the lawyer said, had reason to remain in the tent with this acquaintance because it had begun raining. Evidently, Carmelo Anthony's high school Centennial didn't have their own tent. They only had a tarp. Now, the problem is that Carmelo Anthony remained in the wrong tent for between five to 10 minutes. And Metcalf, who was told by his coach to be a leader and run things, recognized that this was a problem. As prosecutor said, tents are like locker rooms for teens, including a safe space to avoid things being stolen. Or maybe it's like if you're on the football team, this is your bench, your sideline, and if another someone from another team comes and like sits on your bench, you can't do that. Obviously they're going to tell you to leave. And if somebody's loitering in your locker room for an extended period of time, it's normal and appropriate to tell them to leave. After all, you have no idea if this person inside your tent is a violent sociopath with a lengthy record of degeneracy who's liable to stab someone at the slightest provocation because he has no impulse control whatsoever. I mean, that's one of the morbid ironies of the defense here. And you know, people saying that, well, Austin Metcalf had no reason to tell Carmelo Anthony to leave the tent. Well, apparently he did. Apparently he did. Apparently he had very good reason to tell this guy to leave. He was carrying a knife and he was willing to murder people. But it's really a moot point because there's still no reason to kill Austin Metcalf. Even if the tents were completely open to. To everybody, which they weren't. Defenders of Carmelo Anthony had claimed that video footage would show some violent attack by Metcalf, but that simply did not happen. So things are looking appropriately dire for Anthony at this point. But in case he needed yet another sign that this case is already going extremely poorly for Anthony and his legal team, take a look at some of the mainstream coverage of the trial this week. The big story, according to corporate press, is that no black people were seated as members of the jury in jury selection. Both prosecution and defense get to strike a number of potential jurors as long as they have a non racist reason for doing that. And the defense is saying that the prosecution broke that rule. Watch. Within the last hour, a jury has been chosen to decide the closely watched murder trial of Carmelo Anthony.
- [17:40]
B
More than 500 people were on the list of potential jurors, but the jury will not include anyone who is black despite this case being racially charged. Fox 4's Alex Boyer joining us now. Alex? Hey guys, good evening. That's right, you know, and I can tell you that a court spokesperson confirmed that there are indeed no black jurors on this panel. And I can tell you that before this jury panel was seated, the defense objected to three black black women being struck by the prosecution. Now the prosecution contended that it was due to the fact that the women were educators, noting that this incident happened at a school function with young students. The defense then pointed out that those were 3, 100. The three of those rather were 100% of the available black jurors in what's called the strike zone, adding that the state struck all three. The judge went out and reviewed, reviewed their questionnaires and came back and said that the defense's challenge to the three jurors being dismissed was denied. The judge said the court found that the state had non racial means to strike the jury.
- [18:45]
A
Now they don't mention that the population of Collin county, where the jury was drawn from, is around 10 to 12% black. So if you just randomly selected 12 people from Collin county, the odds are decent that no black people would be in your group. In fact, the odds are around 25%. They also don't mention that some of these potential black jurors managed to disqualify themselves, which we'll get to in a moment. But first we need to talk about the prosecution's stated reason for passing on several of the black potential jury members in this news report. You're simply told that some of them are teachers and that the prosecution is wary of having teachers on the jury since they work with students like Metcalf and Anthony. Of course, the Real reason is that teachers are mostly communists and female teachers in particular have mostly had their brains rotted out by social justice propaganda. Note that one teacher was allowed on the jury pool, although he didn't. Doesn't deal with teenagers, so the prosecution allowed him to hear the case. But in any event, the demented race hustlers who apparently still represent Carmelo Anthony put out this statement about the situation. Quote, the Next Generation Action Network is outraged by today's jury selection process. In the Carmelo Anthony trial, the prosecution used its final strikes to remove the remaining qualified black jurors from the jury pool, raising serious concerns about fairness and equal justice. We respect the court, but we will not remain silent. Ngan will continue monitoring this case and informing the public every step of the way. Every person deserves a fair trial and confidence that justice is being administered without bias. We're calling on the court to ensure Mr. Anthony's constitutional rights are fully protected. Now, there's a few very important things to understand here. Just as a preliminary matter, some of these potential black jury members were obviously unqualified. As I just mentioned, one of them even said that he would never put a brother behind bars. So he said the quiet part out loud. Obviously, he can't be on the jury. Watch.
- [20:40]
C
Potential jurors were also asked if the age of the 19 year old defendant, who was 17 when authorities say he fatally stabbed 17 year old Austin Metcalf at a track meet, would influence their judgment as well as his race. One prospective juror, who prosecutors identified as African American, said he would have a hard time putting a brother in jail. But a question from Anthony's attorney, Mike Howard, drew the ire of several prospective jurors when he asked them, how do you feel about the country's immigration policies? A number of them refused to answer, saying it was irrelevant.
- [21:15]
A
So this was a highly dysfunctional process, but not for the reasons that Carmelo Anthony's lawyers are suggesting. Think about how revealing this is. The defense team wanted to know the jury's opinion on open borders. Now there's only one reason to ask that question in the context of this case, which obviously has nothing to do with open borders. They want Democrats on the jury. That's it. They're using the immigration question as a proxy to figure out the political affiliation of the jurors. And the defense team is doing that because they understand that Democrats are the party of social unrest and revolutionary activism and anti white racism. Democrats are lockstep. And in everything they do, they want to promote the narrative that whites are the oppressor and blacks are the victims. And in this case, that means they'd vote to acquit for, you know, obvious reasons. As for the black juror who openly admitted that he wouldn't put a black defendant in prison, at least he was honest. You know, the typical black juror who, who's racially biased doesn't go around admitting it. But the statistics here are pretty clear on this point. There have been plenty of studies on this, and we'll throw some of them up on the screen right now. Black juries are roughly 30% less likely to find a black defendant guilty as compared to a white defendant. And black juries are 300 more likely to find a white criminal guilty. That's how we got the O.J. simpson verdict. And if Carmelo Anthony's defense team manages to select a juror who thinks like this, then they're guaranteed a hung jury at a minimum. With America's 250th birthday around the corner, there's no better time than to learn something new about our country. Our friends at Mount Titano media have put together a huge collection of the greatest American speeches called Finding our words. Words that made America. Many of these speeches have been forgotten, despite how pivotal they were in the creation of our country. So what better time to learn something new about our country than right now? Now you can order a hardcover or paperback version of this book or if you'd rather listen to it instead, they have an audiobook available on audible as well. With narration by Michael Knowles, Andrew Clavin, Spencer Clavin, along with some U. S. Army generals and leaders in classical education. This is a perfect read. In the lead up to America250. Go to Mount TatanoMedia.com to get your copy of Finding our words, Words that made America again. It's Mount titanomedia.com Every parent has a list of things they're going to get around to eventually. Updating the will, organizing important documents. Getting life insurance is one of them. Problem is that eventually isn't a plan. If you have children and no life insurance, you're making a bet. If you're married and have no life insurance, you're making a bet. Maybe not intentionally, but you're making one. You're betting that nothing unexpected is going to happen. You'll always have more time. You'll get around to it later, that tomorrow is guaranteed. Most people don't think about it that way, but that's what they're doing. The reality is that being a parent means planning for situations you hope never happen. Not because you're pessimistic, because you were responsible. That's why life insurance matters. Ethos makes getting life insurance fast and easy 100%. Online, you get a quote in seconds, apply in minutes, and get same day coverage. No medical exam. You just answer a few simple health questions online and get up to $3 million in coverage, with some policies as low as $30 a month. Life insurance doesn't solve every problem, but it can help provide financial security for the people who depend on you. And if you're responsible for a family that's worth taking seriously, protect your family with life insurance from Ethos. Take 10 minutes to get covered today with life insurance through Ethos. Get your free', @ethos.com Walsh that is E T H O S.com Walsh Application times may vary, rates may vary. So here's the truth. As uncomfortable as it may be from a statistical perspective. Whether you like it or not, eliminating black jurors from a case like this is probably the only way to have a fair trial, given the demonstrated statistical tendency of black jurors to be so racially tribalistic in a situation where they're expected to uphold the law in a fair and unbiased manner. Like, that's. That's. That's the only way to have a fair trial. Otherwise, you get O.J. and the juror, the jurors in that case who have since admitted that they let him walk because he's black. You know, one of the many problems with mandatory diversity is that the rule of law is destroyed as various racial and ethnic tribes begin looking out for their own interests. That's how the justice system, quote, unquote, works in the third World. And by importing the third World, that's what our justice system has become as well. Now, if you doubt what I'm saying, take a look at what's happening outside the courthouse. Every day, black activists are shouting about how they want to kill white people and how Carmelo Anthony did nothing wrong. They want to see more white children getting slaughtered solely because they're white. In their view, because of slavery or whatever, blacks are justified in doing whatever they want. Watch. Only good cracker is a dead cracker. Only good cracker is a dead cracker. Only good, good cracker is a dead cracker. Only good cracker is a dead cracker. He was not an aggressor. Carmelo was not an aggressor. He was minding his damn business when them boys came up to him. Now, it's a cliche to even point this out. But imagine the hysteria if white people did this. Imagine if instead of walking into the Capitol building and taking Nancy Pelosi's lectern, a development that led to 5 million FBI raids and congressional investigations, imagine if white people in large numbers paraded in front of a courthouse in 2026 calling for the indiscriminate murder of black people. Now think back 60 years to the civil rights era, and imagine that the peaceful protesters were actually saying the exact same things this guy's saying. Actually, you don't have to imagine it. That's exactly what happened. But you get the sense that Carmelo's defense team is a little upset with these demonstrators. I mean, obviously their goal is to intimidate the jury, and that strategy might work. At the same time, for this trial, it's clear that Carmelo's lawyers want to hide the fact that he's a barbarian. And to that end, Carmelo Anthony's defense team has tried to dress him up to make him seem, you know, less thuggish. You can see the courtroom sketches there. They've made sure their client is clean cut, given an oversized suit to make him seem like a child. But it's all theater. And actually, one of the coaches made this point when he was being questioned on the stand yesterday. He told the jury that Carmelo Anthony now looks nothing like he did last year when he stabbed Austin Metcalf to death. But if we're being honest, the defense team probably isn't worried about that testimony. In fact, they're not worried about any of the testimony or any of the evidence. From the moment they took this case, they understood that Carmelo Anthony has just one chance of acquittal. They need to get one of those activists from outside the courthouse, inside the jury pool. Now, with certainty, we could say that they failed to get black, black activists on the panel. But whether or not Carmelo Anthony is convicted now depends on whether or not any of the remaining jurors are loyal members of the Democratic Party or otherwise leftist activist. It's a very sad state of affairs, but that's the reality of the so called rule of law and the so called criminal justice system in this country. From Britain to Frisco, Texas, anti white militants are emboldened and they've never enjoyed more support from their own governments. They simply cannot be allowed to continue their campaign of racial terrorism and intimidation. Now, the good news is that as we saw from the protests in Britain earlier this week, millions of indigenous Britons recognize the stakes in order for justice to continue to exist. As a concept in the Western world. There must be justice for Henry Novak and there must be justice for Austin Metcalfe in the form of locking Carmelo Anthony away in a cage for the rest of his life like the monster he is. That'll do it for the show today. Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening. Talk to you tomorrow. Have a great day. Talk to you on Monday, actually. Have a great weekend. Godspeed. Martin Luther King, Jr. Is an American icon widely considered one of the greatest Americans who ever lived. A man who had a vision for a colorblind society in post racial America. He had a dream. It's just not the dream you thought it was. Where his true ames a colorblind society or something far more radical who bankrolled him? What unfolded behind the scenes in Birmingham, Alabama in 1963 was civil disobedience actually peaceful? We wanted to show you a clip of the I have a Dream speech, but according to our lawyers, we can't. In fact, King's family has made a lot of money suing media outlets. They want to silence critics like us. What they're doing makes it very difficult to judge Martin Luther King, Jr. Not by the color of his skin, but by the content of his character. Is America today stronger, more unified and racially equal than before King's rise? These questions demand answers. And as Americans, we are entitled to a full accounting of the civil rights movement and its consequences. King's movement fundamentally transformed our country and our system of government. I speak as a citizen of the world. Each day the war goes on. The hatred increases, though the cause of evil prospers. First part of our two part special on the civil rights movement, a new Constitution, available now on Daily Wire. Plus.