Loading summary
Ryan Reynolds
Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile with a message for everyone paying big wireless way too much. Please, for the love of everything good in this world, stop with Mint. You can get premium wireless for just $15 a month. Of course, if you enjoy overpaying, no judgments. But that's weird. Okay, one judgment anyway. Give it a try@mintmobile.com Switch upfront payment
Narrator/Commentator
of $45 for 3 month plan equivalent to $15 per month required intro rate first 3 months only, then full price plan options available, taxes and fees extra. See full terms@mintmobile.com immediately after Carmelo Anthony was convicted of murder for savagely stabbing 17 year old Austin Metcalf through the heart at a track meet, he broke down in tears and began sobbing uncontrollably. He had been out on bail for the duration of the trial thanks to a favor from an activist black judge. And now he was faced with the reality that he'd be going to prison for a very long time. Anthony was so distraught that his lawyer pleaded with the judge to allow him to take Carmelo somewhere to pull himself together. But the judge, a Marine veteran named John Roach, denied the request. The judge informed Anthony that he was now in the custody of the government. And then the judge said simply, things move differently now. It was obviously a difficult statement for Anthony, his family and his supporters to accept, but it's true. Things do move differently now. And they aren't just moving differently for Carmelo Anthony. After decades of coddling terrorist degenerates and black supremacists, the people of the Western world are tired of it. We've simply had enough. We're tired of the intimidation, the violence, the fraudulent narratives, the manipulation, the censorship. We're done with pretending that the police are racist as a way to excuse black violence. We're done with pretending that asylum claims are real and that the great replacement is not. It's hard to pinpoint exactly when this transformation was complete. It was sometime in between the slaughter of a white teenager at a track meet and the near beheading of a white man in Northern Ireland. But there's no denying that things are indeed moving differently now. Carmelo Anthony is in prison, Northern Ireland is on fire, and white men are finally stepping up. There will be no more excuses. The new civil rights movement, a civil rights movement that protects the civil rights of all people to live in peace without the threat of violence following them everywhere they go has begun. And unlike the old civil rights movement, we're not trying to discriminate against anybody on the basis of race. We want to remove from society anyone of any race who would make the Western world uninhabitable. And if the people we remove from society happen to belong disproportionately to one demographic group or another, well, that's just how it goes. Things move differently now. Just as Anthony struggled to accept this new reality, all of his supporters seemed gobsmacked by the guilty verdict. They truly were not expecting this outcome. And to be honest, from where I'm sitting, I don't understand what they're so upset about. Carmelo Anthony's parents famously wanted their son to live in a gated community, and now he will. So it all worked out for them in the end, you might say. But for some reason, outside the courthouse, the mood was less than enthusiastic among Anthony's biggest fans. They seem genuinely furious and also more than a little bit confused. Watch.
Protester/Supporter
What do you want us to do? What do you want us to do? At this point, what I'm lost for I don't know what to do. I got five boys I don't know why I ain't got nothing to tell them no more. You can't walk away no more.
Dominique Alexander
Rest in peace, Trayvon Martin.
Narrator/Commentator
What do you want us to do? She asks. She's totally perplexed. The black guy is going to jail for murdering somebody, and now she has no idea what she's supposed to do do. And, you know, I've reflected on this question and admittedly this is a very far out idea and it's never been tried before. So I would completely understand if this woman rejects my suggestion. But after a lot of careful consideration and meditation, I have one idea for what you could do going forward. If you don't want to end up in prison for 35 years, you could not murder people. That's one thing you could do. Now, I know it sounds totally ridiculous, implausible, but. But hear me out. If you don't stab innocent people through the heart for no reason, you'll be fine. You can do like 10 million other things. You could pick up a hobby. You could learn a new language, plant a garden, go for a jog. There's a nearly infinite list of things you can do with your day, especially in your case, because you presumably don't have a job and are on welfare. Your days are wide open to do just about anything you want. Just don't kill anyone or commit any other crimes. Aside from that, the world is your oyster. But this woman clearly thinks that that's impossible. Along with everyone around her. Then the guy to her left who randomly says, rest in peace, Trayvon Martin. Which, you know, could mean a couple of things. Either he has Tourette's and simply has no other choice but to vomit out random words, or he believes that black people should have the right to pummel white people into the pavement in addition to stabbing them. So it's hard to say, but either way, there's a certain morbid humor in seeing these people outside the courthouse throwing up their hands and declaring, well, if I can't stab anyone to death, then I don't know what you want me to do with my time. Can't stab anyone, can't shoot anyone. What? I'm out of ideas. But as confusing as these comments were, somehow the paid professional commentators over at Court TV were not any more coherent. In fact, they had a full on meltdown after the guilty verdict was announced. This has to be one of the top 10 all time television meltdowns ever captured on camera. It's really quite something. Watch.
Court TV Legal Analyst (Michael Jafar)
I mean, this is. I'm questioning the jury and ask him, how did you reach your verdict? How'd you reach it so quickly? What happened here was a four inch knife. He used it one time. He was, he was pushed. I'm not saying that it was right, but what are you, what are you doing? How did you get this verdict? I'd want to know. My whole identity as a defense attorney would be in question. Right. I'd be. I'm questioning my identity right now and I have nothing to do with this case. How could you, how could you come back like that? I would be enraged. I'm enraged right now. This is very upsetting. And then on top of that, to compound it, this dumb judge didn't allow cameras in the courtroom. What was your wisdom? What were you thinking? How you put on a robe. Are you that much of an imbecile that you won't let cameras in the courtroom in a case like this? This is not a rape case. This is something different. This is something that's clearly the whole community is enraged. And you knew that before the trial started. So, I mean, this is, this is very upsetting.
Narrator/Commentator
Yeah. You only stabbed Austin Metcalfe one time. What's the big deal? I mean, everybody knows the first stab is free. No charges apply if you manage to puncture the sternum and obliterate the heart wall in just one stab. But if you need two or three stabs to finish the job, well, then according to the esteemed legal experts at Court tv, then you might be in some trouble. And then the analyst Says randomly that he's questioning his identity, which honestly seems like too much information for a Court TV segment. I don't know if he's announcing that he's trans or what, but it would help explain why he's so, you know, enraged and unstable. Apparently. This guy's name is Michael Jafar. He obviously shouldn't be allowed on television ever again. If you can count being on Court TV TV as being on television. He made all seven viewers in the audience, who presumably were only watching because it was on TV in a dentist waiting room or something much dumber for having listened to him. And by the way, this guy was not an aberration at Court tv. All of their analysts were shell shocked by the verdict to a degree that was, frankly, hilarious. Watch. Besides wow. Which a lot of us are feeling.
Court TV Legal Analyst (Michael Jafar)
Thoughts?
CNN Commentator
I was not expecting the top charge. I really was thinking that they would see manslaughter. Still guilty, but manslaughter, different sentencing, but guilty of murder. So, you know, that's heavy.
Narrator/Commentator
Wow.
CNN Commentator
And I hope everyone just does not seem like going to become. It seems like we're going to have a problem there.
Narrator/Commentator
This is dumb.
News Reporter
You can see the.
Narrator/Commentator
This is dumb. That's heavy. Wow. Shocking. Wow. Now, that reaction would be appropriate if a. I don't know, a bald eagle had broken through the courthouse window and, like, pecked Carmelo Anthony's eyes out or something. I mean, they're acting like something totally unexpected and horrific just took place. And there are supposed to be legal analysts who do this for a living. For a legal expert, a guilty verdict in a case where even the defense's own witnesses said the defendant was at fault should be just about the least shocking development of all time. Manslaughter would have made sense if Anthony pulled out the knife and then Austin Metcalfe tripped and impaled himself on it. Which, by the way, is something the defense attorney offered as an actual explanation for the murder. As we remember, if that had really happened, which it didn't, then Carmelo Anthony would not have intended to kill somebody. Instead, he would have done something very reckless that led to a homicide, and therefore he would be guilty of manslaughter. In reality, Anthony brought a knife to a track meet, which is something no other athlete did because it's insane and also against the rules, and he was intent on using it. That's why he kept threatening Metcalf until the moment Metcalf touched him, at which point Anthony instantly stabbed him with enough strength to penetrate his sternum before running away and tossing the murder weapon. If that doesn't qualify as an intentional homicide, as murder, then nothing does. If that's not a murder, then no murder has ever happened in the entire history of the human race. This is rudimentary law. Which is why the jury returned a verdict about as quickly as they possibly could. I mean, you know, they took a lunch break, read the forms, maybe made some small talk, filled out the forms and they were done. The whole process took less than three hours. And there's a reason for that, even if Court TV pretends not to understand it. But Court TV was not alone when it came to pointing out, to putting out embarrassingly bad coverage of the verdict. Here was CNN always stepping up to the plate with bad coverage. Just for another example, watch.
CNN Legal Analyst
Hello. Anthony said, well push me. See what happens then. And he pushed him. And that is when Carmelo Anthony rummaged through his bag, took out a knife. And the jury has determined that when that knife went into the chest of the victim, Austin Metcalfe, that that was murder self. And there was a very wide range of 5 to 99 years. And the defense is going to try to get that down as close as they can to, to the five years. But the issue is he had a knife. We don't know why he had a knife. He did not take the stand. This was a self defense case. And what was in Carmelo Anthony's head was so important because if he subjectively believed that he was going to be killed or seriously bodily injured by Austin Metcalfe, who is the victim now, then he had a right to take out a knife. But he did not take the stand to testify in his own defense. So we don't know what was in his mind.
Narrator/Commentator
His attorneys argued that the killing was in self defense. And a social justice group supporting Anthony compared him to Kyle Rittenhouse. What do you make of that comparison? And the fact that the jury did not find that this was self defense?
CNN Commentator
I'm really shocked by this decision by the jury. Look, this is going to be a difficult case for this country in this moment. It's going to be challenged by civil rights groups. You have a young black man who has now been charged with murder of a young white man by an all white jury in Texas. And we know there are bats and challenges, challenges to the exclusion of black jurors by the defense attorneys. For Anthony, those challenges were not recognized by this court. So we should expect to see an immediate appeal on that basis. And I'm sure there's some other things that the defense attorney will appeal on.
Narrator/Commentator
Yeah, the Kyle Rittenhouse comparison is just. It's just amazing. These people have no shame. Kyle Rittenhouse was being chased down the street by an armed mob. And also, by the way, all of these so called civil rights groups said that he was not justified. Every single, I mean, literally every single person who's claiming that Anthony, that Carmelo Anthony is innocent and had a valid self defense claim, all of them, literally all of them said that Rittenhouse was not justified. So Rittenhouse being chased down the street by a mob that is armed, that is not self defense, they claimed. But stabbing an unarmed kid directly in the heart because he told you to leave a tent, that is self defense. Totally shameless. And also, as a basic factual matter, speaking of being shameless, keep hearing this claim over and over again. This was not an all white jury. It wasn't even close to an all white jury. According to reporters in the courtroom, there were at least, well, there was a one Middle Eastern juror. There were three Asians and one Hispanic. It's a lot of minorities on the jury. The fact that there were no black jurors does not mean that the jury was all white. This is a very simple fact that cnn, which is allegedly a news network, managed to completely botch, assuming they didn't do it on purpose in order to encourage a race riot. Either way, this woman was somehow shocked by the verdict. You know, maybe she should have paid attention to the actual trial before going on television to complain about it. And by the way, even if it had been an all white jury, which it wasn't, that would not be problematic at all in a predominantly white country. Statistically, it makes perfect sense that you'll have all white juries sometimes because there are a lot more white people in the country than. Than other races. And considering that white jurors are, on average, statistically far less tribal than black jurors, your chances of having a fair trial with an all white jury are very high. So this claim about the all white jury is both irrelevant, number one and number two, factually untrue. Then there's the fact that the anchor at the beginning says, quote, if he subjectively believed he would be killed or injured, then he had a right to take out a knife. Well, no, that's not right. That's not even close to right. In this country, if you're going to engage in self defense, it's not enough to have some subjective fear that something is going to happen to you. Your fear also has to be objectively reasonable under the circumstances. So Even if Anthony truly believed his life was in danger for some reason, and he didn't, by the way, which is why he taunted Metcalf, calling him various profanities, implying he was weak and so on, refusing to leave the tent. It still does not, does not mean that he's justified in pulling out a knife at a track meet, objectively in the situation he was in, grabbing the knife in his bag while daring Austin Metcalf to touch him. Refusing to leave the 10 was an unreasonable provocation. Therefore there is no self defense claim. I mean, think about the implications of the definition of self defense that CNN is putting forward here along with all of Anthony's supporters. If all it takes to justify lethal force is that someone touches you or that you subjectively feel that your life is in jeopardy, then you're free to butcher anyone who brushes up against you on public transportation. And the crazy vagrant at the end of the train ranting about how the lizard people are trying to kill him or something is justified in butchering you if he subjectively believes that you're one of the lizard people pursuing him. So they are putting forward a legal theory here that would lead immediately to untold carnage and the collapse of civilization. Other than that, you know, good point, totally reasonable. But if you thought CNN and Court TV were having a hard time processing the verdict, they've got nothing on this guy from the Next Generation Action Network, a group that served as Carmelo Anthony's PR shop for the past year. Obviously they've done a wonderful job. As best I could tell, this group is basically run by a con artist named Dominique Alexander, who swooped in very quickly and became involved in this case, presumably to grab some of the givesend go cash and or raise his profile. Whatever the case, he's a horrible human being. He's the guy who berated Austin Metcalfe's grieving father at a press conference last summer. Just total scum. And yesterday, after the verdict came down, he delivered yet another humiliating press conference in front of a handful of fans who hate white people. Watch.
Dominique Alexander
Speak on behalf of myself, Minister Dominique Alexander. I speak on behalf of myself as president of the Next Generation Action Network. The Next Generation Action Network wanted to respect this process, to be able to make sure that nobody said that the Next Generation Action Network instructed this process, interfered in this process. But what this process did is showing that black lives do not matter in Collin County. It showed us that time and time in American history it has shown us to remove emotions from yet the law, this trial showed that it put emotions over the law after Trayvon Martin and so many countless names. It has shown us that black life is not safe in Collin County. It showed us that they did not listen to the law. It showed clearly that a judge in a interfered in this process. It showed very clearly that a black boy was allowed not one black soul on a jury. And all. All white jury convicted him in two to three hours.
Narrator/Commentator
You can see he's lapsing into the MLK cadence. Why do they always do that? It's like ML is. It's, you know, you're not giving the I have a dream speech here. You're outside of a courthouse where a kid just went to jail for stabbing someone to death, thinks he's giving the I have a dream speech. You have to admire the extraordinary degree of self confidence, though, on display here. I mean, here we have a spokesman who doesn't speak very well, but as far as I could tell, he's patting himself on the back because in his words, the Next Generation Action Network did not instruct the legal process. I think he meant obstruct. But how would they have done that exactly, beyond doing exactly what they did, namely holding insane press conferences where they attacked Metcalfe's father. I mean, it sounds like he's vaguely implying that he could have intimidated the jury or something, but that can't, can't possibly be right. I mean, he, he, he comes across as such a friendly, likable, scumbag parasite. So I don't know what's going on. Then he makes the false claim once again that Anthony was tried by an all white jury. This is a recurring theme among pretty much every black activist who talks about this case. It's totally false, but they all keep saying it. Here's Charles Charleston White, for example. He apparently placed a $50,000 bet on an acquittal, so he's very upset. Watch.
Charles Charleston White
We already got the money set aside for appeals. Vaughn, why all white jewelry? The judge and the DA are buddies, along with the dad. Best friends. That's been our trump card. We've been holding. We knew. I already knew that God has spoken. And you cannot make me believe that as many graveyard white women on that jewelry that's dealing with white guilt about going to heaven is not gonna have no compassion about a kid that's been struck straight A from the time he's ever read a book in school.
Narrator/Commentator
Okay, dude, just shut up and drive the Uber, okay? He's got his Uber passengers in the car. I guess he's on the wrong side of the car for that. But either way, I don't know who those poor people are in the car that have to listen to this illiterate ranting. As far as I could tell, there's only one Carmelo Anthony supporter on the planet who understands that the jury was not all white. Here she is in all her glory and pay attention to her top line conclusion at the end of this interview here.
Protester/Supporter
Watch when they pick an all white jury. They had four white women, two Asians, three. Well, it was two that made it.
Narrator/Commentator
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Protester/Supporter
One Indian lady they had. They had four males, three. That was white. White people are dumb. They don't follow the law. They follow what them people tell.
Narrator/Commentator
Well, there you have it. White people are dumb, they're subhuman, and they don't deserve to live. It's basically the idea, really. This was the basic message that most of Anthony's supporters wanted to send. There was an incredible moment where two black supporters of Carmelo Anthony were being interviewed, a man and a woman. And the interviewer asks them if they're. If they're saying that white lives don't matter. And the woman says, oh, nobody's saying that. At the same time, the guy says, f white lives. Repeatedly until the woman just sort of awkwardly walks off. Watch this moment here. Because I want to play these games.
Charles Charleston White
Y' all want to play these crackhead games. So I'm for playing white lives.
Narrator/Commentator
How about that?
Protester/Supporter
How about that? I hate.
Narrator/Commentator
So there's some mixed messaging coming out of the team. Carmelo, to put it mildly, nobody's saying white lives don't matter except the guy right next to her on camera saying, white lives don't matter, you know, except for him. Now, of course, the reason most of Anthony supporters are so fixated on the idea that the jury was all white, even though it wasn't, and it wouldn't matter if it was, isn't that they believe all white juries are unfair or that white people are stupid. On the contrary, they recognize that these statistics are accurate. And the black jurors, on average are clearly biased in favor of black defendants. That's why they ignore the fact that the jury had Asians and Hispanics and Middle Eastern people on it. None of them are black. So in the eyes of the activists, they're useless. I mean, think about what they're confessing when they make this complaint. They're saying explicitly. What they're saying is that if a black person was on the jury, then Carmelo would have been acquitted or at least gotten a Hung jury. Which means that these activists themselves are saying that black jurors are tribalistic and will reach a foregone conclusion regardless of the facts. Carmelo Anthony was clearly guilty, but if only there were black people on the jury, he wouldn't have been found guilty. So they are very openly advocating for racial tribalism over colorblind impartial justice. Obviously, for her part, Cardi B criminal in her own right, weighed in with this insightful legal analysis in response to the verdict. Quote, wow, just freaking wow. Disgusting. This is not justice. This is trying to make an example. Now she says that like justice is incompatible with making an example of someone. But actually an important function of our judicial system is indeed making an example of people. That's what we should be doing. We should be making an example of every violent criminal. Yes, absolutely. We want potential criminals to look at Carmelo Anthony and conclude, I don't want to end up like him. Therefore I'm not going to stab unarmed people because I feel like they're disrespecting me at attract me. So yes, actually we made an example of Carmelo Anthony and we should make an example of every criminal like him. But I don't want to focus too much on Cardi B or Charleston White or Dominique Alexander because they're just a couple of prominent members of a very large and very dumb movement. And again, this, this, this is from yesterday outside the courthouse. One of my favorite clips from the day. You got to stick with it to the end. Here it is.
Protester/Supporter
Watch to protect black people. Anytime a white man or white child can go and put their hands oppress on anybody and something like this occur, it's self defense. It's self defense. You put your hand on me and see how I respond. What will the people that's standing behind the Anthony family do? That's the question you should ask. You don't stand behind them and we gonna fight. That's what's going to happen.
Narrator/Commentator
What is your relationship?
Protester/Supporter
I have no relations. We're brothers, we're black, we're blacks. We're the indigenous people of this earth. Black people, black sisters and brothers, black kings and queens. We gotta stick together. This makes no goddamn sense. That young boy, he was, he was defending his, his goddamn
Narrator/Commentator
Donald Trump is a goddamn bully.
Protester/Supporter
We gotta stick together. We gotta stop hurting one another. Y' all don't see what's going on.
Narrator/Commentator
So it's an instant classic. You've got the angry black woman vaguely threatening to stab the reporter to death if he touches her, just like Carmelo Anthony stabbed Austin Metcalf. She says black people are the indigenous people of the Earth, which implies that, you know, white people arrive from outer space, I guess, descended down like celestial beings. I don't know. And then she says that she supports Anthony solely because he's black, as if there was any doubt about that. And everybody agrees with her. It's all very normal stuff, clearly the sign of a healthy, functioning democracy. And then right when you least expect, the camera quickly pans to a random guy wearing a white towel who declares that Donald Trump is a bully. And everyone just kind of looks around awkwardly before the woman continues her rant like nothing happened. So, a lot of great stuff. I need to point out here again how absurd it is that some people are claiming that this trial had nothing to do with race. You know, when you have mobs of black people outside the courthouse saying that it is about race, and when they're donating $600,000 to the killer solely because he's black and his victim was white, then it is indeed about race. You might not want it to be about race. I don't want it to be about race. But it is. There's no getting around that. Whether you like it or not, the people outside the courthouse believe they have the right to execute white people with impunity. They're saying so very directly, and they're not alone. That's what these people are admitting on camera. So let's stop pretending otherwise. I mean, it's true that the verdict had nothing to do with race. The jury was not weighing race. The prosecutor wasn't prosecuting based on race. But the case overall became a story about race the moment thousands of black activists rallied around the killer and started handing hundreds of thousands of dollars to his family as a reward for murdering a white kid. Now, you could say it shouldn't be about race. That's true, but it is. Other protesters were somehow even less charming. A few women standing under a tent suggested that Hunter Metcalfe, Austin's brother, should have been killed as well, for reasons that aren't clear. Except for the fact that he's also white, I guess. Watch.
Protester/Supporter
I forgotten. The twin brother would have been with him. You see, they should have both been arrested. Me, I'm.
Narrator/Commentator
Both of. Both of them should have been Dade, she says. It's an almost cartoonishly villainous response. I mean, these people are so evil that it. It almost becomes farcical at a certain point, except that it isn't funny, because a young man was killed and indeed, he had a twin Brother who held Austin in his arms as he died. And as a father of twin boys myself, that image fills me with immense grief and indescribable rage. I can't even imagine what the families feel. But you don't need to be the parent of twins to feel that way. You just need to be a human being with a soul. Which is a bar too high for this woman to meet. Now, there's another irony here. They're also becoming very irate that Nick Sorter is recording them in their tent. Well, what do you think would have happened if Nick had gone under the tent and sat down and refused all of their requests to leave? For him to leave? What? What if they told him to leave 15 times and instead of leaving he called them various profanities and taunted them? What would happen if Nick implied that he was armed and dared them to touch him? That would have been an interesting experiment. And the irony, of course, would have been lost on these morons, but it, but you know, it would have been. It would have been a. A very illustrative. Anyway, speaking of interesting, the Black Panthers showed up to the courthouse with the black version of Eric Cartman, and she offered a few insights about the current state of race relations in the United States. Watch.
Protester/Supporter
You know what? Let this be the mark in the sand. This is a war. This is a war and it's been going on.
Narrator/Commentator
That's an interesting clip. Not just because that woman has the physique of a melting ice cream cone. Also because back in the 70s when the black Panthers declared war on white people, it was a legitimate threat to the future of this country. You know, we needed to invent SWAT teams to deal with it. But if this woman is any indication, we don't need SWAT teams to handle the present day Black Panthers. We need maybe a forklift. That's what they're reduced to and everybody knows it. It's not to say that that black terrorists and supremacists aren't a threat to white people, they clearly are. But as a movement, black supremacy is at its lowest ebb, going back at least 60 years. And by the way, all the clips I've shown to this point have been pre sentencing. The post sentencing clips are also endlessly entertaining, in case you missed it. Just a couple of hours after the jury found Carmelo Anthony guilty, they returned to the jury room to decide how to sentence him. And under Texas law, they had an extraordinary amount of discretion. They could have sentenced Anthony to anywhere from 2 years to 99 years. When you consider all of their available options. In the end, they sentenced him to 35 years in prison. He'll be eligible for parole in 17 years, which doesn't mean he will be paroled, but he'll be eligible when he's around 35 years old. Now, that's obviously far too lenient a sentence. Carmelo Anthony should already be buried in a prison cemetery under a headstone marked only by his inmate number. That's how things used to work in this country. And the alternative? At a minimum, he should have received a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Supreme court determined that those sentences are somehow unconstitutional for people under the age of 18 when they commit, you know, the crime. So the maximum sentence in this case would have been 99 years with parole in 50 years. Instead, the jury opted for a sentence that is 35 years. Far too light. At the same time, being realistic, 35 years is a lot more than I thought they'd give him. I mean, we were all. At least I was bracing for a slap on the wrist kind of sentence where Anthony could walk free when he's like, you know, 23 years old or something. And that didn't happen. So judging by that very low bar, this was a comparative win for justice. But once again, the black protesters outside the courthouse didn't see it that way. Watch.
Protester/Supporter
That's how we supposed to know how to act around white people. What the say? What's for? What is that? What is self defense? Is self defense. Not somebody touching you that you don't want touching you and you defending yourself. What is himself to be? Murdered. Murder. Hold on. The same guy that saved the life? The same guy that saved the life. Austin. Mother as a mother. Mother to mother. Mother. You seen that woman on the mother who was crying? You know damn well Carmelo did not try to kill your son. He wanted to defend himself. Them big ass mother boys in his face. You should have taught your sons to go get a mother adult like we know how to do. But that was in his mother. Baby. You don't get to put murder on somebody child because that could have been your mother. That could have been anybody. Mother. 35 years. Mother to mother. Mother. You should have said, don't give that man. They said five to 99 alive. You should have said five. Did you know that? What time to go down like this? 35 years.
Narrator/Commentator
Yeah, I ran that clip through a translator and it gave up and then exploded. But then I ran it again through a different one and it informs me that at some point during the rant, the Woman stated something to the effect of, you should have taught your son to go get a mother effing adult. Like, we know how to do that could have been your son. That could have been anyone's mother effing son. And you know what? I agree with her. I mean, she. She made a. She. She. It got to me. She made it. She made a. It really resonated. It is so devastating, you know, what a heartbreaking verdict and sentence this was. Imagine being a black parent tonight. How do you protect your children? I mean, if they go out and stab just one person, they might go to prison. I mean, it's like a black man in America can't even murder anyone anymore. Just one murder and they go to prison. Think about that. Unimaginable, heartbreaking. It's Jim Crow all over again. I'm furious. No, actually, what's remarkable about her statement is that is the implication that young black men always run to get an adult. She said, you know, get an adult like we always do. But that's. That's the first I'm learning of. Of this. Yes. You know, black. Young black males, the demographic famous for de escalating physical confrontations by immediately finding a chaperone to mediate the conflict. Happens all the time. Of course, in this case, if Metcalf had run to get an adult, then Anthony would have simply killed the adult. I mean, the whole point is that he didn't want to be told what to do. The fact that Metcalfe was 17 was not relevant to his decision to commit murder. What led Anthony to murder was his lack of impulse control, his lack of basic morality and human decency, his lack of a proper upbringing. The age of his victim I don't think mattered. But according to Jasmine Crockett, who's still in Congress, apparently all these protesters are on the right track. It turns out that according to Crockett, Carmelo Anthony was justified in stabbing Metcalf because of various facts that she makes up on the spot. Additionally, according to Jasmine Crockett, Anthony's knife was not a deadly weapon because it was small. And we all know that small things aren't deadly. Like bullets, for example. Hey, bullets are famous for how benign and harmless they are because they're small. Oh, look at that little bullet. Oh, what could that. How could that ever hurt anyone? Look how small it is. She also states that Austin Metcalf's family hasn't experienced anywhere near the same level of grief as just like the average black woman. So this is high level thinking. You're about to witness.
Jasmine Crockett
Behold, if a 300 pound man is beating me like on top of me and beating me down. I, I'm not limited to, to fist. You know, I would argue that even the only time we go into things like people's hands being considered deadly weapons is typically like if they're a professional boxer or that kind of stuff. But I think by the time you start getting to like football player. Good argument. Good freaking argument. We not talking about like the golfers, we're talking about football players. Right. Like this is what they are trained to do is to inflict like serious physical contact. And it's my understanding the decedent was that black women, especially black women who have black male children, live in fear and agony every single day. A fear and agony that I promise you the Metcalf probably never spent a day living that way. And we're gonna have to have just some real conversations about race in this country. Was it a switch? I don't know what he had. It was like, it seemed like it was a multi tool, almost like a Swiss Army. Yeah, like with the little scissors and everything and whatever. So it was small? Well, I would argue the size of it alone. You wouldn't even think it's a deadly weapon.
Narrator/Commentator
And then I forgot he had the bag.
Jasmine Crockett
If it was one of the little, like, I, I don't know, like I, I do think that's why he went to his coach and was like. But I don't think I heard him that.
Narrator/Commentator
Yeah, well, I would argue that you're retarded, Madam Congresswoman. I mean like medically you should go get checked out. Might be eligible for additional entitlements. And she says that the average black woman carries around more grief just by existing than the parents of Austin Metcalf whose child was just stabbed in the heart and killed. I mean, this is psychotic. This is, I say this is not just like being dumb, this is psychosis. And it's part of the left's mythology that we've talked about before. Probably their, their dumbest mythology, and that's saying something is this idea that like the average black woman in America is, is just this martyr, this quiet sort of martyr like figure who, who quietly, with great dignity carries the burdens of, of the whole human race on her shoulders. Just this. It's nothing to do with reality whatsoever. Could not be more divorced from the actual reality that we all see around us. But this is says and put aside the fact that the knife that she's talking about that was so small was used to kill someone other than that small inconsequential detail, you wouldn't think it's a deadly weapon. You know, a deadly weapon has to be large, says Jasmine Crockett. Everyone knows that a bazooka is a deadly weapon because it's big and heavy. So is a tank. This is the legal definition of a deadly weapon. A deadly weapon, it says in the law, is, and I quote, big and scary. But if a weapon is not big and scary, then it's not deadly, even if you kill somebody with it. I mean, a knife. A knife is about the size of a pencil. That's, like really small. Therefore, it can't be a deadly weapon. When you stab someone to death and the police show up, the first thing they ask is, well, how big was the knife? That was two inches. Oh, well, you're fine then. But have a good day. As we get closer to America's 250th anniversary, here's a question worth asking. Is it possible to actually fix education, restore some civic sanity, and enjoy summer with your family all at once? Mount Tatano Media says yes. It's called Finding Our Words, Words that Made America, a collection of the greatest speeches in American history. Many of them have been almost completely forgotten, which is a shame, because these are the words that defined what this country is supposed to be this summer. You can read it or listen to the new Audible edition, featuring voices you'll recognize, including Michael Knowles, Andrew Clavin, Spencer Clavin, Bill Whittle, U.S. army generals and leaders in classical education. Every speech comes with a beautifully written essay by journalist Tracy Lee Simmons so you actually understand the full context of what you're hearing. This is the perfect summer read alone with your kids, on a road trip wherever. Let these words do what they were meant to do. Go to Mount TatanoMedia.com to get your copy of Finding Our Words, Words that made America again. That's Mount Tatano media.com you can usually tell pretty quickly who actually wants a job and who's just going through the motions. Some people show up prepared, engaged, ready to work. Others, not so much. If you need to hire your for your business, how do you separate the candidates who are really excited about your opportunity from the ones that are just kind of meh? Well, ZipRecruiter is how you do it. ZipRecruiter has a new feature that quickly lets you see the most interested, qualified candidates first so you meet the right people faster. And now you can try for free@ziprecruiter.com Walsh ZipRecruiter's new feature puts the most interested qualified candidates right at the top of your list. No wasting time sorting through people who are not serious. Their smart matching technology also connects you with the qualified candidates and does it fast. And candidates can actually explain why they want the job. Use ZipRecruiter and find enthusiastic talent fast. Four to five employers repost on ZipRecruiter. Get a quality candidate within the first day, and now you can try it for free@ziprecruiter.com Walsh that's ziprecruiter.com Walsh Meet your match on ZipRecruiter now. If you're beginning to suspect that Anthony's defenders have extremely low IQs, that they can barely understand the world around them, much like much less abstract concepts like self defense or justice, then you may be onto something. As for the claim that football players are trained to beat people up other than maybe the Saints during Bounty Gate, that's not true either. And regardless, of course, that's not what Metcalf did. He did not just go wailing on Carmelo Anthony. He barely touched him. There wasn't a single witness who testified that Austin Metcalf did anything to Carmelo Anthony other than lightly push him in order to get him to move out of the tent where he wasn't supposed to be. The only conclusion we can draw here is that these activists recognize that Anthony is guilty, which is why they have to fabricate key details of the case in order to justify his murder. All the same, as tempting as it would be to spend the next five hours mocking Carmelo Anthony and his awful family and his truly barbaric supporters, there's a broader point that needs to be made here. Now, six years ago, this trial would not have ended this way. It's likely that prosecutors would not have brought charges in the first place. I mean, at the height of BLM insanity, 35 years with a sentence you would get if you were a white guy who filmed a crime. It wasn't the kind of sentence you get if you were a black perpetrator stabbing a white victim, especially if you had the corporate press and BLM activists on your side. Well, that's changed now. As I said at the outset, we've simply had enough of this. I mean, no amount of whining from black activists is going to convince us or compel us to go back to the way things were. The Western world has had enough. Which is why, by the way, Belfast is on fire right now. You know, what's the expression again? The buildings are on fire? No, I don't think they are mate. Looks like climate change to me, mate. It's a, it's a mostly peaceful arson spree. Now really, you can condemn it all you want, but the reality is there's only so much abuse that the indigenous people of Europe can take. It's only a matter of time before they would unite and defend their nation and their way of life and fight back against a full scale invasion that is intended to replace them. They just saw their government cover up the horrific murder of a first year university student named Henry Novak at the hands of a third world thug whose family never should have been allowed in the country in the first place. It's not like it was a rocket science that they scientists who they imported into Britain because he was a vital contributor to the British economy. He was a gig worker delivering food. I mean he was a, he was a, an economic drain on the country and neither he nor his family had any interest in assimilating. Quite the contrary. They wanted to kill white people and conquer the country. And to this day the government is hiding the videos the killer shot with his phone as he taunted Henry Novak in his final moments. All we saw was a portion of the body cam footage which was horrific all on its own. Imagine what the rest of it looks like. And then just days after Britain's saw the footage of the police officers attacking or mocking Henry Novak as he lay dying, just after that they saw this. All of the Western world saw this. Some barbarian from Sudan tries to behead a white guy on the street. And how does the government of the UK respond? By lecturing the right wing about inciting violence. By telling people not to share the footage because it might inflame tensions. Well guess what, the government has lost control of the situation. So here's what so called migrant houses look like in Belfast right now. These are taxpayer funded houses for illegal aliens which the government hands out even though many native Britons can't afford housing. But this is what it looks like. The houses are on fire and the foreigners are being escorted out by firefighters. Now to understand how radical this is, realize that Britain has sent women to prison for tweeting out support for anti immigrant demonstrations. And this is where we are now. I mean these people are, are simply not afraid of their government anymore. The government has lost legitimacy. Watch.
News Reporter
On the outskirts of North Belfast, several
Narrator/Commentator
hundred people gathered at the Clock Fern roundabout. After the speeches, 200 masked men broke away and marched into the White Abbey estate. Now you may not approve of violence. I don't approve of it either. But nonetheless, as a factual matter, what's happening right now is that the people of the UK have had enough. And the more the police and the government try to suppress the truth, the worse things are going to get. Watch this.
Northern Ireland Police Spokesperson
So this evening you can expect to see an increased police presence across Northern Ireland and over the coming days to help support and reassure all of our communities and to keep them safe. We understand also there's considerable posting on social media and people will have really well create questions and concerns. But please do not share footage that might cause trauma and risk to the loved ones of those families involved. And on our investigation, we're also aware of protest activity planned across Northern Ireland this evening and continue to monitor that and plan accordingly. I know that last night left people feeling a range of emotions from fear to anger. People will want to have their voices heard, but we all remember over the last two years significant disorder that only led to damage in our local communities and young people getting caught up in disorder.
Narrator/Commentator
Please do not share footage that might cause trauma. That's the official response of the police force to the footage of a beheading on the streets of Belfast. They're claiming that the problem is the fact that people recorded the beheading, not the beheading itself. This is the line the whole government is using. Here's a statement from a leftist member of Parliament from Belfast named Claire Hanna. Quote, the violence in Belfast was horrific. The video will create fear and shock. No good will come of sharing it or of turning on each other in this society, including for the cloud of online voices who don't know or care about us and who offer absolutely nothing for the future. So the problem is not the beheading. It's the footage of the beheading I want. I wonder, you know, I haven't checked, but what would happen if I went back and checked this woman's tweets to see what she had to say when the. When the video of George Floyd was making the rounds. Did she say the same thing? Hey, don't share that video. It's being used by people for clout. Something tells me she didn't. Hannah also appeared on television where she pushed the same message. Watch this.
News Reporter
It's nightmarish. And. And you've seen some of those scenes, obviously unspeakable violence in north Belfast and people understandably revulsed and shocked and fearful and angry, but within minutes, unfortunately, negative actors online and politicians locally who don't really care what communities in North Belfast have been through straight into the issue to incite and to divide and to call men out onto the streets in Belfast. And what you are seeing is a race based pogrom. We are seeing men going door to door asking to get the foreigners out based exclusively on the color of their skin. It's not based on what they're contributing to society, what their status here is. And it's terrifying for people in Belfast who want this sort of politics to be far beyond them.
Narrator/Commentator
Well, she's wrong when she claims that this is a race based pogrom. No one in Belfast hates anybody because of the color of their skin. That's not why they're trying to evict people from the country. They don't have some irrational disdain for certain skin colors. People in Belfast are furious about the fact that they're overrun with invaders, many of whom are violent and most of whom are clearly net negatives on society. Open borders as a policy choice has been catastrophic for the native people of the uk. It's obviously unsustainable. It's hurting everybody and their families and their children. That's what they're upset about. While the demonstrations and riots are most intense in Belfast, they're happening all over the uk as far away as Liverpool. Britons are openly mocking migrants in the streets. Watch. They're saying, get back on your dinghies, meaning that they should get back on their boats and go home. And in the video, they're talking to Deliveroo drivers, which, as best I can tell, is the UK equivalent of DoorDash. The man who killed Henry Novak was a driver for Deliveroo. It's one of the most common occupations for migrants living in the country. What the leaders of the UK need to understand is that while these comments are obviously offensive and ugly to their sensibilities, they're also the moderate option. Mocking foreign invaders and deporting them is the more measured path. The radical one, the one that's surfacing now in Belfast, is the one that nobody should want. It's the much uglier thing that nobody should want to see. I certainly don't. The radical path is chaos that no one can control. And that outcome becomes inevitable the more the British government takes the side of invaders over their own citizens. We're talking about citizens who should be heirs to an empire. Instead, they're a global laughingstock. And it's all because of open borders and decades of globalist rule. It's an untenable situation. This photo from PA Wire sums up the situation about as well as anyone can. There's a transit bus on fire in the background and on the public display system, which has been, hasn't been affected by the blaze on the public space as a message reads apologies for any inconvenience. So it's an effective and sobering illustration of the state of the UK which is currently in a state of managed decline. They're expected to be polite and proper as foreigners slaughter them in the streets and as their country falls apart from within. But a lot of them aren't going along with anymore with it anymore. And, and as the Carmelo Anthony verdict demonstrates, neither are we. The genocidal anti white, anti western race hustlers are losing. They are flailing, they are defeated. They are barely coherent and they are desperate. We still have a lot of work to do if we want to restore the Western world to what it once was. But the first step, which is always going to be the hardest, has just been taken from the UK to Texas. The step was to listen carefully to the complaints of a deranged violent mob, to comprehend exactly what they're saying and what they're trying to do, and to respond simply. Things move differently now. The fact that we can finally take that step without apologizing for ourselves is the single most important development in Western civilization in living memory. The reason they're in a panic is that as dumb and incoherent as they may be, even they can see it too. That'll do it for the show today. Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening. Talk to you tomorrow. Have a great day. Godspeed. Last month we judged Martin Luther King Jr. Not by the color the of his skin, but by the content of his character. American school kids spend a lot of time hearing about MLK and Rosa Parks. Have you noticed no one ever asks what Birmingham, Selma and Montgomery are like today? The legacy of the Civil Rights movement wasn't a racially harmonious utopia. It's hollowed out urban cores. Hundreds of thousands of dead Americans, raped grandmothers, ethnic cleansing entire neighborhoods. This month we survey firsthand accounts of the historic wave of nonviolent crime riots unleashed on this country by the Civil Rights movement, which caused more enduring damage on America's greatest cities than the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Who were the winners and who were the losers? What's the truth about redlining, white flight, affirmative action? Don't want to miss the second part of our special on the civil rights movement, the looting of America on Daily Wire. Plus.
Title: Karmelo Anthony Found GUILTY. Here's What Comes Next
Date: June 10, 2026
Host: Matt Walsh (The Daily Wire)
In this episode, Matt Walsh addresses the guilty verdict and sentencing of Karmelo Anthony, convicted for the murder of 17-year-old Austin Metcalf at a Texas track meet. Walsh analyzes the trial’s aftermath, media coverage, activist responses, and the broader cultural and racial implications. The episode is a no-holds-barred critique of what Walsh perceives as the decline of Western society amid racialized politics, contrasting the swift justice in this case with how, he argues, similar cases were handled during the BLM era.
[05:51-08:35] Court TV’s on-air reaction:
[08:02-09:53] CNN’s reaction:
[10:48-12:26] Analysis of self-defense claim & ‘All-White Jury’ accusation:
[16:58-18:23] Dominique Alexander (Next Generation Action Network):
[19:41-21:16] Charles Charleston White:
[20:46-22:10] Other protester:
[21:56-22:10] Chanting ‘F white lives’:
[23:00–24:37] Cardi B (via social media):
[24:37–25:46] Vague threats toward reporters; black nationalist rhetoric:
[28:00-28:23] Shocking advocacy for more violence:
[29:53-30:16] Appearance of Black Panthers:
[32:37–33:53] Post-sentencing rant by supporter:
[36:44–38:31] Rep. Jasmine Crockett’s defense:
[40:00–50:00+] Broader scrutiny of activism and societal shift:
Walsh: “The radical path is chaos that no one can control. …And as the Carmelo Anthony verdict demonstrates, neither are we [going along with it]. The genocidal anti-white, anti-western race hustlers are losing.” [51:20]
| Timestamp | Segment/Topic | |---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------| | 00:22 | Guilt verdict and courtroom description | | 03:23 | Protester reactions outside courthouse | | 05:51 | Court TV meltdown (Michael Jafar) | | 08:02 | CNN’s legal and emotional response | | 10:48 | CNN’s coverage of self-defense and jury accusations | | 16:58 | Dominique Alexander’s press conference | | 19:41 | Charleston White’s response | | 20:46 | Protester: Jury demographics, “White people are dumb” | | 21:56 | Protesters: “White lives don’t matter; F white lives” | | 24:37 | Racialized protest speech, veiled threats | | 28:00 | Calls for more violence against Metcalf family | | 29:53 | Black Panthers protest, “This is a war” | | 32:37 | Supporter laments 35-year sentence | | 36:44 | Rep. Jasmine Crockett’s legal and emotional rationale | | 40:00+ | Meta-analysis: America and Europe-wide cultural shift | | 46:35 | Belfast: Media, political reaction to migrant violence | | 48:00 | Claire Hanna MP: “Don’t share the video” | | 51:20 | Conclusion on “things move differently now” |
Walsh’s language is provocative, sarcastic, and polemical, mocking both activists and media commentators who, in his view, are out of touch or dishonest. He uses hyperbole, biting humor, and direct personal attacks, especially when addressing protesters, media figures, and politicians. The tone is unapologetically partisan and combative, matching the “no-holds-barred” promise in the show’s description.
This episode captures Matt Walsh’s deeply critical take on the aftermath of Karmelo Anthony’s murder trial, emphasizing a supposed societal turning point where “things move differently now.” He savages the logic of activists, protesters, and media figures who questioned the verdict or saw racial injustice, repeatedly rebutting the “all-white jury” claim and dismissing self-defense arguments. The episode concludes with an extrapolation from this case to the broader context of backlash against multiculturalism and perceived anti-white sentiment in both the U.S. and U.K., claiming the verdict is emblematic of a Western reawakening against lawlessness and tribalism.
Note: This summary includes the key arguments and rhetorical flourishes from the episode, reflecting the original’s language, tone, and attributions. It excludes ad reads, show intro, and outro.