Michael Walsh (3:17)

Do.

Reporter (3:17)

Do you believe that squatting is crime?

Michael Walsh (3:19)

Why?

Reporter (3:20)

Why are you in a $2.5 million property, Ms. Good? Judge John C. Moffett gave remarks before he made the ruling, telling Good she had some demented thoughts to justify squatting. The prosecution replied, this is frankly nuts. Good was found guilty on all counts of burglary and breaking and entering and immediately sentenced to 90 days in prison.

Ian Chen (3:42)

I think the District Court of Maryland did the right thing today.

Reporter (3:44)

Ian Chen, a 19 year old living with his parents in a neighboring house to the home Goode occupied, brought the case before a Mary Commissioner's office because he said he wanted to take back the neighborhood from criminals.

Ian Chen (3:55)

I felt it was my civic duty to do the right thing to file these charges and then to ultimately bring her to justice here today.

Michael Walsh (4:01)

So after nine months in which this woman was living in a house that she didn't own, everything seemed to have been resolved finally. But as we all know, even when they're sentenced to prison, criminals aren't actually punished anymore in this country. And therefore Good got out of prison in less than two weeks after paying $500 out of a $5,000 bond and she immediately moved back into the house. We played some of the footage before, but it's worth revisiting because it includes one of the most extraordinary interviews with an incompetent lawyer that you'll ever see again. This is from the same Fox affiliate in Baltimore. Watch.

Reporter (4:33)

Are we back at it again?

Ian Chen (4:35)

Unfortunately, yes. Less than two weeks of being incarcerated,

Reporter (4:39)

Tamika Good is back in the House 11 days later. Good was released on appeal on February 2nd after posting a $5,000 cash bomb activities at the house starting again. Soon after her release. Four days. A woman wearing similar shoes and green pants was seen moving in and out of the alleged Bethesda squatter home. We spoke with Alex Webster about his client. Look, there's a question. It's really the number one question on everybody's mind. How would your client, Ms. D.A. good, get inside a $2.3 million property

Squatter/Confrontational Person (5:13)

cut?

Alex Webster (Lawyer) (5:13)

I don't know if I can answer that. Allegedly. Can I cut?

Michael Walsh (5:21)

We're rolling. We're.

Producer/Interviewer (5:23)

Yeah.

Reporter (5:23)

I mean, we're. We're rolling, my friend. Yeah.

Alex Webster (Lawyer) (5:39)

Ari, can you re. Ask the question?

Producer/Interviewer (5:40)

Sure.

Reporter (5:40)

Absolutely. So the number one question on everybody's mind is how your client, Ms. D' Amica Good, got into a $2.3 million property.

Alex Webster (Lawyer) (5:51)

Well, Ms. Good did her research. She found out that a certain property was under. Was under the control of a certain group and that there was a title issue. Due to the title issue, she was able to assume the property under squatters rights.

Reporter (6:14)

So in Maryland, there isn't a particular squatter, right? Am I missing something?

Alex Webster (Lawyer) (6:19)

Well, there's not a particular squatter's right, but it's known as squatter rights.

Reporter (6:23)

When you first called the police living next to a squatter, what did they do?

Ian Chen (6:27)

Nothing, really. They just knocked on the door, and when there was no answer, they just got back in their cars and left.

Reporter (6:33)

We press Montgomery county police on why Good and other squatters remain. The spokesperson replied, saying, the squatters have been in the house for more than 30 days, so they have gained residency status. Why does this matter to you?

Ian Chen (6:46)

Because it's the right thing to do.

Michael Walsh (6:49)

The most recent update appears to be that on February 10, the teenager teenage neighbor saw Tamika Good taking property out of the home and placing it in a U haul. So she was arrested for burglary, but again, she still has access to the house, and she's still considered a resident, apparently. As for Tamika Good's accomplice, as of this week, he's out of jail, too. Even though his rap sheet is much longer than Tamika's, he's a free man as well. He's also free to move back into the house. And his story is actually pretty interesting in its own right. It turns out that Georgetown University set up a program to help convicted criminals get jobs, and Good's accomplice used that training to immediately commit more crimes. Who could have possibly predicted that?

News Reporter (7:31)

Watch must get out my face as

Reporter (7:34)

the months long battle continues over squatter takeover of a 2.3 million dollar Bethesda, Maryland home by Tamika Good last year, we're now learning more about her fellow squatting partner in the property, Corey Pollard, who is in federal court on Wednesday in Baltimore for violating probation.

Michael Walsh (7:51)

No or not Right now you don't need to. Those are words that we all hear.

Reporter (7:57)

Pollard was part of the inaugural class of Georgetown University's Pivot program in 2019, a re entry initiative connecting former offenders with jobs. Court records for Pollard show a lengthy criminal history including robbery, vehicle theft and drug related offenses, with arrests in Virginia, Pennsylvania, Maryland and Delaware.

Michael Walsh (8:17)

Presentation, delivery pitches, interaction, networking, all that as a part of entrepreneurship and I learned all that through Pivot.

Reporter (8:28)

Just months after completing the pilot program, prosecutors say Pollard smashed a car dealership window with a sledgehammer to steal nearly half a dozen luxury cars between November 2019 to December 2020. He was later convicted. During sentencing, Pollard argued that he had demonstrated rehabilitation.

Michael Walsh (8:46)

We have a mass incarceration crisis in this country where we have 2.3 million people locked up behind bars, Maryland records

Reporter (8:53)

show Pollard and Good launched a business together in 2020. Pollard also secured work with D.C. based architecture firm Torti Gallas and partners with the help of Pivot. Even further, Pollard is listed as a community development coordinator with WFL Collective, a group that claims it partners with Civic Works and the Baltimore Housing Authority. Despite its claims, WFL Collective is not listed as a charity in the IRS's online database. Meanwhile, while squatting inside the $2.3 million home in December, Pollard was arrested on a warrant linked to yet another Pennsylvania case where he again is accused of stealing a collection of luxury vehicles in June 2024. Prosecutor also argued Pollard had a history of committing serial crimes of dishonesty and was a puppeteer, including his involvement in organizing luxury car theft sprees for years between trials. Despite those claims, Judge Julie E. Rubin ordered his release following Wednesday's hearing. We pressed callous after the hearing about his support for his Pivot client and employee, as well as allegations he falsified a lease for Pollard. So do you think it's appropriate for your client to sit in a squatter home, sir?

Michael Walsh (10:06)

Do you think that's appropriate throughout all of this? By the way, Tamika Good and her accomplice have retained access to her food stamps even when you commit A serious crime. Taxpayers are still required to pay your bills. None of their welfare is impacted by the fact that they barged into a house and set up residence there, committed multiple crimes. They're both free to walk into another empty house and if they can stay there for 30 days or claim to, then it's basically theirs. You ever thought of just how much you really have to keep track of on a daily basis? You've got 12 different passwords, your kids, sports schedules, a grocery list that never stops growing, among many other things. But for all the stuff we manage to remember, we often forget something much bigger. What happens to our families financially if something happens to us? The responsibility of protecting your loved ones and planning for the future is heavy, and trying to navigate life insurance on your own can be a Mess. Our sponsor, PolicyGenius, makes the process dramatically easier by acting as an online insurance marketplace, not insurance company, so you can compare quotes from some of America's top insurers side by side for free and actually understand what you're buying. Their license team works for you, not for the insurance carriers, so they care about your needs, your budget and your family. They help you figure out coverage amounts, prices and terms so there's no guesswork. Policy Genius will answer your questions, handle paperwork and advocate for you throughout the process, which is why they've racked up thousands of five star reviews on Google and trustpilot. Protect your family with a policy that grows with your life. With Policy Genius, you can see if you can find 20 year life insurance policy starting at just $276 a year for a million dollars of coverage. Head to policygenius.com Walsh to compare life insurance quotes from top companies. See how much you can save. That's policygenius.com Walsh this isn't the law in most of the world. This is an American phenomenon that became widespread in the last half century or so. It's a holdover from the medieval period when record keeping wasn't especially good and there was constant fighting over the land so it would change hands a lot. But Even back then, 30 days would have been a very tight time frame. In most of Europe, they required years of squatting in order to claim residency. But in the US for the most part, all you need is 30 days. That's led to a rash of squatters all over the country. Watch.

News Reporter (12:19)

Squatting has been a problem across the country. The National Rental Home Council pinpoints the highest concentrations of complaints in states like Georgia, Florida and Texas. One such case was from Patty Peoples in Jacksonville, Florida, who found out the hard way that squatters had broken in and taken over one of her investment properties.

Property Owner (12:38)

I called 911 and as I'm describing to the officer that there may be somebody that had broken and entered into my house. Out walks a young woman and she said, well, I rented this property yesterday. It only got worse. I own this house.

Michael Walsh (12:53)

It doesn't matter.

Squatter/Confrontational Person (12:55)

Excuse me. If you touch me again, I have

Michael Walsh (12:57)

every right to be in this house.

Squatter/Confrontational Person (12:58)

You don't have every right to be in the house at all.

Michael Walsh (13:00)

I do, ma'. Am.

Squatter/Confrontational Person (13:00)

You do not. When you do not. I'm not touching you. My you are touching me and this lady is touching me. Blocking you from calling in the house.

Property Owner (13:10)

Believe it or not, the police officer told me, I will arrest you if you do this again. They have the right to privacy. I cannot tell you the frustration I felt.

Michael Walsh (13:22)

All these figure out the situation.

News Reporter (13:25)

Adele Andaloro went through something similar when she says squatters took over a home she inherited in New York City. The confrontation caught on camera by our station wabc.

Court Reporter (13:35)

Why is it that I have to

Michael Walsh (13:36)

leave and he doesn't have to leave

Family Member (13:37)

because technically he can't be kicked out.

Michael Walsh (13:39)

We need to go to Portland.

News Reporter (13:41)

At that time in New York City, squatters had tenant rights after 30 days. Making this a landlord tenant dispute.

Michael Walsh (13:49)

The problem with making it a landlord tenant dispute should be obvious to anyone who's ever been a landlord or who knows a landlord. Once you're considered a landlord, you basically can't evict anyone. This is how many foreigners afford housing in places like New York. They just move in and don't, don't pay rent. And then when the landlord goes to housing court, the tenant gets a hardship extension. It gets so bad that landlords eventually offer the tenants a large amount of money to move out. That's what many squatters are hoping for. This is a case out of Chicago where the homeowner decided to move in with the squatters, which is a bold strategy for when the, you know, police and the legal system won't do anything to help you. But they still wouldn't move out. So we he had to offer them cash to get them to leave. Watch.

News Reporter (14:34)

Chicago man says he did the unthinkable when he discovered alleged squatters in his property. He decided to move in with them. Marco Velazquez is the owner of this Southside property which is on the market to be sold. He says his realtor came by with a potential buyer, but there was already people inside.

Homeowner Marco Velazquez (14:52)

I couldn't believe it. It was like A nightmare.

News Reporter (14:56)

Velazquez says a woman named Charmaine and her boyfriend Codero moved in, claiming they recently purchased the property. He says the couple showed police this mortgage document, but Cook county confirms they don't see this mortgage on record. Velazquez's realtor recorded this video. As the couple explained to police they had a right to be there.

Michael Walsh (15:16)

Y' all bogus right now.

Alex Webster (Lawyer) (15:19)

I listen, bro.

News Reporter (15:20)

He says police told them under Illinois's current law, they couldn't remove anyone.

Homeowner Marco Velazquez (15:25)

I said, I'm not moving out. And I said at one point, they gotta leave. They gotta get tired of Osman in the property. I called a couple friends stay overnight and I knew they were not gonna like that.

News Reporter (15:37)

So you're telling me that you and your friends came in and moved in with them?

Homeowner Marco Velazquez (15:41)

Yes.

News Reporter (15:42)

Velasquez says he, his wife and their friends got a few air mattresses and spent the night with the alleged squatters.

Homeowner Marco Velazquez (15:49)

We stayed in the living room. We were watching all the time, the door. They stand in one of the bedrooms.

News Reporter (15:56)

The next morning, he says he realized they were not budging.

Homeowner Marco Velazquez (15:59)

They're like, oh, well, we want $8,000.

News Reporter (16:02)

Velasquez says they negotiated. He had the couple sign a cash for key agreement and he paid them $4,300 to leave.

Michael Walsh (16:10)

This is a situation, as you can imagine, that often turns violent or at least comes very close to being violent. And even in those cases, the police still don't get involved. This is from Georgia Indicator family says squatters have taken over their childhood home.

Court Reporter (16:25)

Just days before it was supposed to be sold. Artase Howell spoke with a family who says the situation has been heartbreaking.

Homeowner Marco Velazquez (16:32)

We throwing a party.

Michael Walsh (16:33)

You know what time it is?

Court Reporter (16:34)

Uh huh.

Family Member (16:35)

From inviting people on Facebook to pool parties, to posting videos on social media from inside this half a million dollar home, one family says squatters have taken over.

Squatter/Confrontational Person (16:47)

It is nightmare. These videos and advertisements are so far reaching that we received a call this morning from someone in Florida that said, hey, I've seen your dad's property on the Internet.

Family Member (17:03)

Lisa, Kevin, Marcus and Marlene grew up in the home. They say it was just last week their dad passed away and not even 48 hours later, the squatters came in like thieves in the night and and took over their childhood home.

Squatter/Confrontational Person (17:17)

It pisses me off tremendously.

Family Member (17:22)

After alerting about the squatters, the siblings called the police. And according to the incident report, the people inside the home supplied Elise. Then later that same day, Kevin went to check on the house and was met by a group of guys.

Michael Walsh (17:35)

They started making threats against my Life. And one of them told his friend to go get something and he came back with a rifle in the doorway. What all these squatters have in common is that in every case, they know the legal system will take their side. Whatever punishment they receive, it won't be anything sufficient. It's. It's a cause, just a cost of doing business. And once they pay the toll, if there is one, they know they can go right back to committing more crimes. This doesn't just apply to squatters. Consider the case of Abdul Abubakar Ali in Minnesota. He pleaded guilty to participating in one of the largest Somali scams that's been uncovered, which is the Feeding Our Future fraud. In total, the fraudster stole more than $250 million by falsely claiming that they had served meals to children and then requesting federal reimbursement. This is from a local news station. Quote, ali used a shell company known as Youth Inventors Lab to defraud the federal Pandemic Meals program under the sponsorship of of Feeding Our Future. Court documents show that Ali and his co conspirators submitted fake invoices and claimed to have served more than 1 million meals despite serving none, helping him to personally pocket more than $100,000. Those are obviously very serious crimes as part of a fraud that costs Minnesota taxpayers a quarter of a billion dollars. He lied about feeding hungry children when in fact he was doing absolutely nothing. He took advantage of an extremely dumb program that could only function in a high trust society, which is not the kind of society we have anymore. His nonprofit, which is Fake Youth Inventors Lab, took in millions of dollars. And after all that, guess what Ali's sentence was? It was just handed down the other day. And here it is. Watch. We have another defendant in the $250 million Feeding Our Future fraud scheme that received his sentence today.

Court Reporter (19:28)

He is one of only a few defendants who have actually learned the punishment for their crime as dozens of others await sentencing. Fox 9's Courtney Godfrey is at the federal courthouse tonight with details on this case. So, Courtney, what's the latest there? Well, good evening, guys. This morning a judge handed down a sentence for 40 year old Abdul Abubakar Ali, a one year and one day sentence for conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Ali, along with two others, operated a federal child nutrition program site called Youth Inventors Lab. The defendants claimed to have served approximately 1.5 million meals to underserved children over the course of seven months. But federal prosecutors claim in reality they served only a small fraction of that. When we visited the site in St. Paul, back in 2022, right after charges were filed, we found an empty storefront and neighbors who claimed they never saw a child walk through those doors. Did you ever see a child come in and out of those doors?

Reporter (20:31)

Never.

Michael Walsh (20:32)

Never.

Homeowner Marco Velazquez (20:33)

Every single person who was ever coming

Reporter (20:35)

in and out of that building, they were an adult.

Court Reporter (20:40)

Today the judge gave Ali a shorter sentence than the pre sentencing guidelines suggest, citing that he has already paid $90,000 of his $122,000 in restitution and that he was one of the first defendants to plead guilty in this case.

Michael Walsh (20:55)

So the scam nets $250 million in total. A lot of that money is laundered and untraceable to Ali's associates. Gone for good. But the feds can only prove this Guy personally took $100,000 into his bank account. So to punish him, they're going to demand that he pays back that a hundred thousand dollars and then they're going to sentence him to one year in prison with the option to send him to a halfway house in a matter of weeks. That's it. So you see how this works. If you join a conspiracy to defraud the government for $250 million and that conspiracy indeed steals more than a quarter of a billion dollars, you basically won't suffer any consequences whatsoever. I mean, the worst case scenario, you'll have to pay back the money and not even all of it, or even close to all of it and serve a few months in jail. Meanwhile, your buddies with the $250 million can make you a very, very rich man. Once you get out of prison, your non profit connections can buy you a mansion and a sports car, no problem. And no one in the government will do anything about it. That's a trade a lot of people are willing to make. I've been with PureTalk for a long time now, and it's always been important that the companies I work with share my values. Thankfully, PureTalk is one of those companies. They're veteran led, which means helping veterans is one of their main missions. Plus they've donated over half a million dollars to America's Warrior Partnership, a fantastic organization on the front lines of preventing veteran suicide. And PureTalk's creating American jobs with a US only workforce may be cheaper to send jobs overseas like other companies, but they're committed to delivering the best experience possible for their customers. They give you the same towers, Same network, same 5G coverage as one of the big guys, but for a fraction of the price. Let's go to PureTalk.com Walsh to switch to PureTalk. That's PureTalk.com Walsh switch to my wireless company and America's wireless company, Pure Talk. Would you be willing, would you take $250 million for a year in prison? I think a lot of people would take that deal. And that's basically the deal that the court system is offering now. We're in this position because for the better part of a century, both political parties have constantly expanded welfare programs and invented new ones to the point that it's impossible to police them for fraud even if we want to, which very few people do the feeding. Our future scam was only identified in the first place because the fraudsters were extremely obvious about it. At one point they said they were serving 5,000 meals a day in one tiny location, which is a lot more than a typical McDonald's serves in Midtown Manhattan. And if they hadn't been so obvious, they'd been a little bit more clever and subtle, nobody would have detected it. They'd still be doing it right now. The government doesn't have the resources to count every child who supposedly eats a meal in Minneapolis at one of these locations. But if you go back and watch Republicans talk about welfare in the middle of the 20th century, this kind of fraud never occurred to them. Here's a speech from Richard Nixon, for example, where he announced a major welfare reform. Nixon oversaw the expansion of food stamps from around 2 million people to more than 15 million. And here's what he said at the time.

Producer/Interviewer (24:14)

It is morally wrong for a family that is working to try to make ends meet to receive less than a family across the street on welfare. This has been bitterly resented by the man who works, and rightly so. The rewards are just the opposite of what they should be. Its effect is to draw people off payrolls and onto welfare rolls. And that is why tonight I therefore propose that we abolish the present welfare system and that we adopt in its place a new family assistance system. Initially, this new system will cost more than welfare. But unlike welfare, it is designed to correct the condition it deals with and thus to lessen the long range burden and cost. Under this plan, the so called adult categories of aid, aid to the aged, the blind, the disabled, would be continued and a national minimum standard for benefits would be set, with the federal government contributing to its cost and also sharing the cost of additional state payments above that amount. And for the first time, benefits would be scaled in such a way that it would always pay to work. With such incentives, most recipients who can work will want to work. This is part of the American character. But what are the others? Those who can work but choose not to? Well, the answer is very simple. Under this proposal, everyone who accepts benefits must also accept work or training provided suitable jobs are available either locally or at some distance. If transportation. Transportation is provided. The only exceptions would be those unable to work and mothers of preschool children.

Michael Walsh (26:12)

In the short term, we'll talk. We're told it will cost more money, but in the long term, we'll see extra savings, extreme savings. Nixon told us the welfare roles will decrease because after all, who would lie about being disabled? Who would lie about needing government assistance to eat? Well, a half century later, there are something like 40 million people on food stamps in this country. That includes more than 25 million adults. And we know for a fact it's not even debatable that the vast majority of these people are committing fraud. As the Wall Street Journal reported, quote, 3/4 of adult food stamp beneficiaries are overweight or obese. Only 3% are underweight. Yes, three quarters of the 25 million adults who get food stamps are fat, which by definition means they don't need food stamps. But they're getting them anyway because we don't require a weigh in to qualify. It's the honor system. As long as they say they're looking for work, they get to steal your money. And on top of that, according to the center for Economic and Policy Research, quote, adults with disabilities make up about 25% of SNAP recipients, nearly twice their share of in the overall population. Well, how do we know these people aren't faking a diagnosis to get out of the work requirement, as limited as it is? That's a good question. Since we already know that millions of Americans are defrauding the system already, it's not exactly a stretch to suggest that they're also lying about a disability to get out of the work requirement. In fact, we know, we know that's happening. We know there are a ton of fake disabled people walking around out there. Think about how many people claim that they have a disability just so they can bring their dog on a plane. Think about how many people are willing to. Able bodied people, normal people, seemingly are willing to lie about that just for the advantage of bringing a dog on a plane. Did Nixon consider any of this when he drastically expanded food stamps? Probably not. And by the way, when Nixon said it would be impossible in his system for people to get more money by not working, he was wrong about that too. One of my producers worked on a property that was converted into Section 8 housing in Kansas City, Missouri. And as part of this process, they ran the numbers on a single mother of a three year old and a five year old child. And we'll put that up on the screen. In scenario A, the mother is making minimum wage 1375 an hour. In scenario B, the mother is making $110,000 a year at her job. And in this comparison, after welfare benefits are paid out, including SNAP, childcare assistance, Section 8 assistance, Medicaid, the child tax credit, the woman with the minimum wage job ends up taking home 99, $368 a year. But the woman with the actual job paying $110,000 a year nets only 99,344. That's less than the woman with a minimum wage job. Woman with the high paying job doesn't qualify for a premium tax credit or earned income credit or SNAP or Medicaid or Section 8 and she has to pay a lot more income tax. So this is the system that Democrats created with a lot of help from Republicans. They've created a gigantic incentive for poor people to steal taxpayer money and even for people who are not poor to steal taxpayer money. According to the Congressional Budget Office quote, for someone earning just below the poverty line, the effective marginal tax rate can jump from 14% to 34% or higher when they cross certain income thresholds. So it's best to stay below the income threshold. And at the end of the day, you have more money than the honest worker earning $110,000 a year. Keep this in mind the next time you hear about the expansion of any welfare program in any context. This is where it leads in every single case. The only solution, what Nixon should have done, is to abolish all of it. The only people who should receive government assistance to buy food are people who are about to starve to death as demonstrated by a regular weigh in. And that will end up being zero people. Meanwhile, the only people who should be allowed to live inside a home should be are the people who own the property. And anybody else or whoever, whoever they invite in, anybody else should be forcibly removed. Squatters rights should be abolished immediately. We invented them around the same time we came up with every other bad idea and we can get rid of them just as quickly. Now. Will any of that happen? Probably not. And for that reason, especially if you own any property, you need to be ready to defend it because your government won't.

Court Reporter (31:06)

I do believe that if people have

Michael Walsh (31:08)

committed treason against the United States of

Court Reporter (31:11)

America, their statues should not be in the Capitol.

Michael Walsh (31:16)

History is written by the victors. And since the 1960s, we've been told mostly by people whose ancestors didn't even live here. During the war, the south committed treason. But if the Confederates were traitors,

Alex Webster (Lawyer) (31:29)

then

Michael Walsh (31:30)

why was Jefferson Davis never put on trial for treason? What were Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson afraid of? Did they know something they're not allowed to say? Today, it's time for the truth. So here it is. Robert E. Lee was a military genius and a man of immense honor. He was beloved, loved by Americans from the north and south for a century after the war. This is the real history of the Civil War. Have you ever thought of just how much you really have to keep track of on the daily you've got 12 different passwords, your kids, sports schedules, a grocery list that never stops growing, among many other things. But for all the stuff we managed to remember, we often forget something much bigger. What happens to our families financially if something happens to us? The responsibility of protecting your loved ones and planning for the future is heavy. Trying to navigate life insurance on your own can be a mess. Our sponsor, Policy Genius, makes the process dramatically easier by acting as an online insurance marketplace, not an insurance company, so you can compare quotes from some of America's top insurers side by side for free. Actually understand what you're buying. Their licensed team works for you, not for the insurance carrier, so they care about your needs, your budget, your family. They help you figure out coverage amounts, prices and terms so there's no guesswork. PolicyGenius will help answer your questions, handle paperwork, and advocate for you throughout the process, which is why they've racked up thousands of five star reviews on Google and trustpilot. Protect your family with a policy that grows with your life. With Policygenius, you can see if you can find 20 year life insurance policies starting at just $276 a year for just a million dollars in coverage. Head to policygenius.com Walsh to compare life insurance quotes from top companies and see how much you could save. That's policygenius.com Walsh.