Proof For Your Liberal Friend: Climate Change Is A Lie

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Matt Walsh Show - "Proof For Your Liberal Friend: Climate Change Is A Lie"

Release Date: July 11, 2025

---

Introduction

In the episode titled "Proof For Your Liberal Friend: Climate Change Is A Lie," Matt Walsh of The Matt Walsh Show delves into the contentious debate surrounding climate change, challenging prevailing narratives presented by mainstream media and climate advocates. The discussion is anchored by critiques of prominent media figures and scientific reports, underscoring Walsh's perspective that climate change alarmism is exaggerated or misrepresented.

---

Challenging Mainstream Media Narratives

The episode opens with Matt Walsh addressing recent claims by CNN's climate correspondents regarding the imminence of a climate catastrophe. He references a segment featuring Bill Weir, CNN's Chief Climate Alarmist, who asserts the non-existence of climate alarmism and emphasizes the urgency of the climate time bomb.

Bill Weir [00:12]: "There's CNN's Chief Climate Alarmist here to tell us that climate alarmism doesn't actually exist... the Earth is going to pass this critical warning threshold now much earlier than expected."

Matt Walsh critiques this perspective, highlighting the persistent nature of the alarmist narrative and its portrayal of an inevitable apocalypse.

Matt Walsh [00:46]: "We really are on the verge of an apocalypse. Nothing alarmist about it, he claims... I think if that's the case, really the most powerful statement and the most worthwhile thing that CNN could do is to just shut down entirely."

Walsh sarcastically suggests that CNN should halt its operations to make a meaningful statement about reducing carbon emissions, questioning the network's commitment to combating climate change.

---

Media's Selective Reporting and Natural Disasters

A significant portion of the episode focuses on the omission of natural events, specifically the massive underwater volcanic eruption in Tonga, from mainstream climate change reporting. Walsh underscores how such events could influence global temperatures and challenges the media's reluctance to incorporate these factors into the climate change narrative.

Bill Weir [07:15]: "And climate change has always gone CO2, so it follows it... there's other factors like volcanic and solar interruption."

Walsh points out the Tonga eruption's substantial contribution to atmospheric water vapor, a potent greenhouse gas, and laments its absence in media discussions.

Matt Walsh [08:28]: "A volcano just sent a massive amount of water vapor into the air and what scientists are calling a once in a lifetime event, which scientists also say has clear ramifications for the climate and they don't even talk about it on ABC News."

He emphasizes the discrepancy between the scientific implications of such events and their coverage in mainstream media, suggesting a deliberate omission to maintain the prevailing climate change narrative.

---

Critique of Climate Change as a Man-Made and Racial Issue

The episode features a segment with Aisha Sadiqa, a UN climate advisor, whose statements Matt Walsh vehemently disputes. Sadiqa attributes the climate crisis not only to human activity but specifically to "white man," intertwining climate issues with capitalism, colonialism, and racial oppression.

Aisha Sadiqa [15:10]: "The climate crisis is man made. And it's not just man made, it's white man... protecting the most vulnerable communities... this includes black trans women... and indigenous peoples."

Walsh rebuts these claims by presenting data that indicates the majority of global pollution originates from non-white regions, particularly Asia and Africa. He challenges the racial attribution of environmental degradation, highlighting that:

Matt Walsh [15:53]: "Most of the air and water pollution on Earth comes from Asia... Africa is the second worst offender when it comes to water pollution specifically."

He further dissects the intersection of climate change rhetoric with social justice narratives, arguing that this blend perpetuates a victim-oppressor dynamic rather than fostering global unity against environmental issues.

---

Deconstructing "Wokeness" and Climate Alarmism

Expanding the discussion, Matt Walsh explores the concept of "wokeness," critiquing its fluid and ideologically driven nature. He posits that the conflation of climate change with social justice undermines potential unifying effects that a shared environmental challenge could offer.

Matt Walsh [15:53]: "The climate alarmists filter their climate alarmism through the victim oppressor narrative... all of reality... is defined by the victim versus oppressor."

Walsh argues that this divisive approach diminishes the potential for collective action, as it instead fosters internal conflicts within the broader climate discourse.

---

Scientific Data and Temporal Impacts of Climate Change

A critical examination of scientific studies forms a cornerstone of the episode. Walsh references research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, which claims that human-induced climate change is affecting the Earth's rotation, subtly lengthening each day.

Bill Weir [06:07]: "So yes, the answer is yes, there is human influence for sure... it's the remarkable footprint of human amplified climate change."

Walsh scrutinizes these findings, highlighting the minimal impact of the reported 1.33 milliseconds increase in day length per century, and underscores the skepticism towards such claims within his rhetoric.

Matt Walsh [09:24]: "...it's making the day longer by... increasing by 1.33 milliseconds per century... a day will be a full second longer in about 90,000 years."

He employs this example to illustrate what he perceives as the overreach of climate change predictions, suggesting that alarmist projections lack immediate and tangible relevance.

---

Conclusion: The Persistence of Climate Alarmism

Throughout the episode, Matt Walsh maintains a critical stance against what he views as exaggerated and politically motivated climate change narratives. By dissecting media coverage, scientific reports, and intertwined social justice themes, he presents a case that challenges mainstream perspectives on environmental issues.

Matt Walsh [16:50]: "You don't have to be a maniac... you have to be someone who is surrounded by propaganda... has no real out... who's not exactly a critical thinker."

Walsh concludes by urging listeners to adopt a more skeptical and analytical approach towards climate change discussions, emphasizing personal discernment over acceptance of prevailing media and scientific consensus.

---

Notable Quotes with Timestamps

• Bill Weir [00:12]: "There's CNN's Chief Climate Alarmist here to tell us that climate alarmism doesn't actually exist..."

• Matt Walsh [00:46]: "We really are on the verge of an apocalypse... shut down entirely."

• Aisha Sadiqa [15:10]: "The climate crisis is man made. And it's not just man made, it's white man..."

• Matt Walsh [15:53]: "Most of the air and water pollution on Earth comes from Asia... Africa is the second worst offender..."

• Bill Weir [06:07]: "There is human influence for sure... human amplified climate change."

• Matt Walsh [09:24]: "It's making the day longer by... 1.33 milliseconds per century... full second longer in about 90,000 years."

---

Final Thoughts

"The Matt Walsh Show" episode "Proof For Your Liberal Friend: Climate Change Is A Lie" presents a vehement critique of mainstream climate change narratives, particularly those propagated by major media outlets like CNN and ABC News. Through dissecting scientific reports, highlighting overlooked natural events, and challenging the racial and social justice dimensions intertwined with climate activism, Matt Walsh endeavors to persuade his audience to question and critically evaluate the prevailing discourse on climate change.

---

Disclaimer: This summary reflects the viewpoints expressed in the podcast episode and does not endorse or refute the claims made therein.

Transcript

[Aisha Sadiqa]

The climate crisis is man made. It's not just man made, it's white man.

[Ginger Zee]

Is this climate change on display for us right now? Is there other causes behind this?

[Bill Weir]

Here's CNN's Chief Climate Alarmist here to tell us that climate alarmism doesn't actually exist. Just into cnn, a dire warning about the state of the planet. A new UN report warns that the climate time bomb is ticking and the world is running out of time to avoid catastrophe. So that assessment comes from the world's most authoritative body on climate change, which says the Earth is going to pass this critical warning threshold now much earlier than expected.

[Don Lemon]

I mean, we're staring it down. They're talking about the early2030s.

[Bill Weir]

CNN Chief Climate correspondent Bill Weir is here. So please tell me we can stop this, Bill.

[Ryan Mao]

Oh, I'd love to tell you that we have to believe that, and we can. And that's really the takeaway is that the tools are in our hands. There are no miracles needed when it comes to technology. It's all right here. It's all about political will. But let me explain the context here. Every year thousands of peer reviewed papers around the world look at the ice or the clouds or the penguins or every little aspect of our changing planet. The IPCC, these are scientists from 195 countries have to synthesize all that information. Their governments have to approve the language and then they put this report together and give it to lawmakers in time for this next cop that's coming up in the United Arab Emirates. And it is the most unequivocal. There's no such thing as climate alarmism anymore. The time bomb is ticking. But we have the guide on how to defuse the bomb right in our hands right here.

[Bill Weir]

The time bomb. We've been hearing about this ticking time bomb for a long time. But most, and you imagine maybe the old fashioned cartoon time bomb with the long wick that's going down and it's going to explode. Or maybe you imagine the actual digital timer on it. We have to find a way to diffuse it. You have to cut the old 90s action flick. You gotta, someone's gotta cut the red wire and the blue wire. But they keep extending the time. That's the interesting thing, they keep extending. It's about to go off. It's always just about to go off and then we're all gonna be dead. I will say, you know, I think if you're cnn, cnn, they've got the chief climate reporter and he says climate alarmism doesn't exist because no matter what you say about the climate, whatever alarming statements you make, it's true. And so it's not alarmism. That's the point that he's trying to make. We really are on the verge of an apocalypse. Nothing alarmist about it, he claims. Well, I think if that's the case, really the most powerful statement and the most worthwhile thing that CNN could do is to just shut down entirely. You think about all the carbon emissions, think about all the energy that is used just to keep a cable news channel on the air 24 7. Think about the carbon footprint. And if we're on the verge of planetary destruction because of this, then I think you have no choice morally but to shut down operations entirely. And that would be a statement to the rest of the world. I mean that if you want to say something that's meaningful, that would do it. You say we're going to shut down completely because we can no longer contribute to the coming apocalypse. We are going to. I want to hear from Don Lemon and all the rest. We're shutting down. We're going to go live in the woods, in caves, and we're going to, we're going to, we're going to subsist on, on berries and locusts like, like John the Baptist in the wilderness. And that's how we're going to live our lives because we cannot contribute anymore to the coming planetary extinction level event. That would be a statement, or maybe it really wouldn't be a statement at all because nobody would notice even if they did that. This is CNN that we're talking about. Imagine you're a climate expert working for a major news network when one day out of nowhere, Hillary Clinton announces that MAGA Republicans are causing the world to get hotter simply by voting the wrong way and by cooking too many cheeseburgers. I guess she says these MAGA Republicans are lighting the planet on fire. They're causing the warmest summer in the history of the world, going back billions of years, even before we had thermometers to measure this kind of thing. That's how dangerous these MAGA Republicans are. But last week we went into great detail about how Hillary Clinton sounded like a Mesoamerican shaman when she made all those claims. But if you're a climate expert in the mainstream media, you can't laugh at what she said as we did. You can't just move on. Instead, you have to run cover for Hillary Clinton because she's effectively your boss. You revere her. Therefore you have to go out on television and dutifully assert with maximum confidence that, yes, Hillary is right, we are breaking temperature records right now. And that's happening specifically because of man made climate change that's intensified in recent years. That's the party line. And indeed, like lemmings, all the big networks came out and said exactly that one by one. Here's ABC News, for example, giving Hillary some much needed backup. Watch.

[Ginger Zee]

And heat isn't just affecting the U.S. scientists say July is set to be the Earth's hottest month in recorded history. Let's bring in chief meteorologist Ginger Zee and host of the FiveThirtyEight politics podcast for more on the heat and how it's impacting voters. Thank you both for being here. Ginger, it's been a busy July for you. You and your team have been reporting on this all throughout the month. What sticks out to you after looking at the heat that's affected across the country, but also around the world?

[Don Lemon]

Right. And that's what you have to remember. This is global warming. It is global heat. And so there are people in the Midwest or Northeast who are like, well, most of the summer's been okay. Like it really hasn't been anything above average. Yes, we've had the desert Southwest having incredible heat. We're talking consecutive he. But Europe, Asia, so many pockets that add up globally to the hottest July on record.

[Ginger Zee]

Is this climate change on display for us right now? Is there, are there other causes behind this? And do we know what the domino effect is of having the heat be this high for so long in so many places?

[Don Lemon]

Right. So yes, the answer is yes, there is human influence for sure. We knew this year was going to be hot because of El Nino. But to see it turn out this way has the remarkable footprint of human amplified climate change. And that's what the scientists were saying. Virtually impossible to see records obliterated like this without human influence.

[Bill Weir]

Well, the scientists are clear, say the climate experts. We just experienced the hottest July in the history of the planet because we're polluting too much. Our carbon emissions are changing the weather in real time. Notice they have the political analyst literally sitting right next to the climate expert. Just to underscore the point that this whole segment is about scaring as many Democrats as possible so that they vote in the next election. At this point, Joe Biden needs all the help he can get. But wait a minute. Skeptical viewers might ask, aren't there other periods in world history when temperatures have spiked long before humans and even the dreaded MAGA Republicans existed? Could we be witnessing something caused by Nature instead of Trump voters. ABC News expert anticipated that you might start thinking along those lines. And here was her reply to that.

[Don Lemon]

And with temperature has always gone CO2, so it follows it. Here's the difference. That peak of temperature, which is the blue kind of around 100 and some thousand years ago, that was with volcanic and solar interruption. That's the thing that has driven CO2 prior to now. Right now it's not the sun and it hasn't been volcanoes to that degree. It has been following the one line on the graphic and that is CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions by humans.

[Bill Weir]

So the expert is acknowledging that there have been periods throughout world history when the climate has gotten much warmer, obviously, but she says that was due to highly unusual events like volcanic interruption. And we don't have that right now, the expert says, at least not to any significant degree. So she concludes that Trump voters must be the problem. Is that true? Admittedly, I'm not a climate scientist or an Aztec shaman or any kind of expert in the weather whatsoever. I can walk outside my house and see what the weather is. So I can do that, but that's about it. I do, however, pay attention to the news and I couldn't help but notice something that ABC's crack climate team somehow forgot to mention. Just a year and a half ago, this happened in the Pacific Ocean.

[Robert Rode]

Tonight, jaw dropping images of an extraordinarily powerful and now deadly volcano erupting in the Pacific Ocean. This video captured a day before an even larger eruption of the same underwater volcano rocked the island nation of Tonga, triggering tsunami alerts across the globe. The scope of that eruption best seen from space. Satellite images showing a massive cloud of smoke spewing in all directions and as high as 12 miles in the air. The most powerful volcanic activity in at least three decades. Its stunning power felt across five continents. The entire west coast of the United States and Alaska under a tsunami alert for most of the weekend. In Peru, two people drowning after abnormally high waves slammed ashore. Ports from Japan to New Zealand littered with sunken fishing boats. The powerful waves tossing them like toys.

[Bill Weir]

And they popped their heads out of.

[Ryan Mao]

The, out of their boat to see.

[Bill Weir]

A red catamaran going over the top of my boat. So that is the force of nature there.

[Robert Rode]

Shock waves in Central Europe, more than 10,000 miles away. The before and after images are staggering. The force of the blast nearly wiping this uninhabited island off the map, well.

[Bill Weir]

That somehow went unnoticed. Over at ABC News, an underwater volcano erupted in Tonga. It was so big you could see it from space. The entire west coast of the US was put under a tsunami warning, according to NASA, which wrote up a detailed analysis of the event Lost August. The eruption caused a sonic boom that circled the globe twice. The eruption also, quote, blasted an enormous plume of water vapor into Earth's stratosphere, enough to fill more than 58,000 Olympic sized swimming pools, according to NASA. That's significant because according to NASA, volcanic eruptions normally cool the planet by emitting a lot of dust particles that reflect sunlight away from the planet. That didn't happen this time. And as one NASA scientist put it, we've never seen anything like it. So what's the, what's the upshot? Well, water vapor traps heat. It's the single most abundant greenhouse gas that exists in the atmosphere. It's responsible for half of the greenhouse gas effect on the planet. So here was the prediction from NASA as of last August. This was last summer, and this is what they wrote, Quote, the sheer amount of water vapor could be enough to temporarily affect Earth's global average temperature. So they were predicting last summer that temperatures would rise because of the volcano. That seems like a major detail to leave out of literally every single news report on historic climate change this summer. It's like reporting on wildfires without mentioning that they were caused by arsonists. Something that our news media also does regularly. So think about how extraordinary this is. A volcano just sent a massive amount of water vapor into the air and what scientists are calling a once in a lifetime event, which scientists also say has clear ramifications for the climate and they don't even talk about it on ABC News. Democrats in the party of science blame MAGA Republicans and nobody in the mainstream media corrects them or mentions the billions of gallons of water vapor that were just spewed into the atmosphere by a volcano. A volcano that by the way, I don't think you can blame on man made climate change. That's when they'll start talking about this is when they can figure out a way to blame us for the volcano. Maybe the MAGA Republicans set it off. Maybe they, I don't know, threw a bomb down into the underwater volcano somehow, I don't know. To be clear, this is not some temporary spike in temperature that NASA was talking about. According to NASA, quote, excess water vapor injected by the Tonga volcano could remain in the stratosphere for several years. That again was NASA's projection in August of last year. By December of 2022, it appeared that NASA's prediction had been vindicated. Research published that month by the Meteorological Research Institute, NASA and The University of Chicago confirmed that the eruption last year increased the mass of water vapor in the stratosphere by 13%, which is a huge amount. And this water vapor will remain in the stratosphere for years, just as NASA had originally predicted. The researchers added that the unique nature and magnitude of global stratospheric perturbation by the Tonga eruption ranks it among the most remarkable climatic events in the modern observation era. Seven months later this past July, the research meteorologist Ryan Mao had this response to the fallout from the eruption. Quote, Based upon the last few months, it seems the effect of the eruption on global temperatures may have been greatly underestimated. And Ryan Mao was right. Just about two weeks ago, yet another paper came out on the eruption. This one was for researchers at Caltech's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. This paper found that the eruption sent 40 trillion gallons, not billions, but trillion gallons of seawater into the stratosphere, what the researchers called an unprecedented water vapor injection. Last week, Dr. Robert Rode, the lead scientist at the independent nonprofit Berkeley Earth, reviewed these recent findings. He concluded that quote, as a powerful greenhouse gas, this water may have contributed to recent warming. Now these seem like relevant developments, especially if you're covering the MAGA heat wave that's setting the United States on fire. And yet virtually every major media outlet is ignoring this. Being a husband, father and host of my own show means life never slows down. Imagine trying to eat 31 different fruits and vegetables every day. Sounds miserable and time consuming. Frankly, I just don't want to do all that. I'd rather go get something deep fried and unhealthy sometimes. Damn it. But with Balance of Nature fruits and veggies, there's never been a more convenient dietary supplement to ensure you get a wide variety of fruits and vegetables every day. With 31 different whole fruit and vegetable ingredients, Balance of Nature takes fruits and vegetables, they freeze, dry them, turn them into a powder and then turn them into a capsule. From there you take a fruit and veggie capsules every day and your body knows what to do with them. Simple as that. Go to bounceofnature.com use promo code Walsh for 35% off your first order. It's preferred customer. Plus get a free bottle of fiber and spice. That's balancenature.com promo code Walsh here's someone that you should meet. This is Aisha Sadiqa. She's a UN climate advisor. As Libs of TikTok pointed out yesterday posted this video this woman works at the UN and yet is not only a radical climate change Alarmist, but is also rabidly anti white. Maybe the word yet is not necessary there. As if there's some sort of conflict between, you know, working at the UN and having this attitude. Everyone at the UN does. But anyway, take a listen.

[Aisha Sadiqa]

I say this because the climate crisis is not possible. The climate crisis is not a result of natural disasters. It's actually man made. It's a result.

[Bill Weir]

I'll say it again because I think they missed it.

[Aisha Sadiqa]

The climate crisis is man made. And it's not just man made, it's white man. It is the result of capitalism, years of colonialism, years of racial oppression. And so if you want to get involved, the way that we save our planet is when we protect the most vulnerable communities among. And this includes black trans women, this includes indigenous peoples, and this is why it includes children. Children and young folk. Because when we protect them, then we can protect everybody else.

[Bill Weir]

Okay, so you know what really gets me about this? Well, first of all, it's just not true. You know, it's not true on several different levels, but on the racial end of it, most of the air and water pollution in the world comes from Asia. So she says that climate change is not only a man made problem, but a white man made problems. Well, most of the air and water pollution on Earth comes from Asia. In fact, we talked about it recently, that one Asian country has 83 of the top 100 polluting cities, the cities that have the most pollution. One Asian country has 83 of those top 100 cities and that's the country of India, so that's Asia. And then Africa is the second worst offender when it comes to water pollution specifically, which means that the people that are destroying the planet, the worst offenders at destroying the planet are non white. So that's the first thing. But the second is, and I was thinking about this today, which is that if there could possibly be one advantage, if there could possibly be one positive, one little glimmer of a bright side to climate alarmism, which there is no advantage. Okay? But if there could be one, it would be that climate alarmism you would think and hope would have at least, even though it's totally false and everything else, it would at least have a sort of unifying effect. Because if the planet is really doomed to, if the climate apocalypse is on the horizon, then we're all screwed, right? We're all in the same sinking boat. It's like if there was an asteroid headed towards Earth, you know, an asteroid the size of Australia or something headed towards Earth. We're all going to be vaporized. And that's what, and that's what these people think climate change is anyway, basically. Well then when it hits, we're all going to be equally dead. So maybe we can find some measure of unity in our shared sense of being totally screwed. Like I said, it's a very small silver lining, but you would hope that would be there. But we can't even get that from the climate alarmists. And the reason is that the climate alarmists, they filter their climate alarmism through the victim oppressor narrative. So even this, even a planet wide catastrophe which they falsely believe is on the horizon, even that somehow becomes an us versus them thing. Everyone's gonna die. And it's still like some people are more affected than others by this. And we know that's because this is all of course a left wing phenomenon. And this is leftism seeing the world based on this calculation of victim versus oppressor, which by the way, there was another round of discussion, there's been another round of discussion on social media this week about defining the word woke. And I think this time I think Libs of TikTok Chaya Raichik, she was giving a speech and she was asked for a definition of woke up and she didn't immediately offer one that is totally cohesive. And so that becomes, at least in the clip that's circulating, I'm sure it's largely out of context, but. And that became another round of like, see those conservatives, they can't even define the word woke. Well, part of the reason why it could be hard to find because we're talking about it's an ideology. An ideology. These are ideas, okay? This is not like being unable to define the word woman. Woman is a biological category. It's a physical thing. Okay? With the physical definitions. Ideas are not that. Ideas change. They can be. And with something like wokeness is a whole bunch of really confused ideas and the ideas themselves also change. That's one of the hallmarks of a woke person, is that they could say something one minute and then five minutes later say completely the opposite and seem to believe both of those things at the same time. And so when people look at that and we can see this pattern and we see like there's this category of people who have this confused idea of the world. But trying to define what that confusion is is a little difficult sometimes. But it is perfectly possible to define. There has many defining elements. And if someone presses you for a definition, a one sentence definition, you could do worse than this, which is seeing the Entire world through this lens of victim versus oppressor. All of reality, all of reality, every aspect of reality itself is defined by the victim versus oppressor. I just want to read this headline to you. Okay, here's the headline. It is attention grabbing, at least it was for me. Climate change is messing with time more than previously thought, scientists find. So that's the headline. The headline is that climate change is so bad and we're going to find out just how bad it is. Okay, but it's so bad that it's not just warming up the earth and it's going to drown us all and all that it's actually warping time itself. Our very conception of time is being changed because of climate change. It's a big study and it's a big important thing, big headline. So let's find out a little bit about this. How could that be the case? Okay. The impacts of human caused climate change are so overwhelming that they're actually messing with time, according to new research. Polar ice melt caused by global warming is changing the speed of the Earth's rotation and increasing the length of each day in a trend set to accelerate over the century as humans continue to pump our planet, pump out planet heating pollution, according to a study published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. And yet another sign of the huge impact humans are having on the planet. Quote, this is a testament to the gravity of ongoing climate change, says a geophysicist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and a report author. The number of hours, minutes and seconds making of each day on Earth are dictated by the speed of the Earth's rotation, which is influenced by a complex knot of factors. And there's some science there which may or may not interest you. These include processes in the planet's fluid core, the ongoing impact of the melting of huge glaciers after the last ice age, as well as melting polar ice due to climate change. Okay, so the climate change is making, it's making the day longer. The day is getting longer and longer. So if you feel, if you've been feeling that, if you've been perceiving that, that it feels like the days just drag on and on and on, it's true because of climate change. That is all the fault of climate change. But how long are these days getting because of climate change? Well, we have to, you have to read about, I don't know, 10 paragraphs down before you get to this. The team of international scientists looked at a 200 year period between 1900 and 2100 using observational data climate models to understand how climate change has affected day length in the past and to project its role in the future. Climate change fueled sea level rise caused the length of a day to vary between 0.3 and 1 milliseconds in the 20th century. Over the past two decades, however, the scientists calculated an increase in day length of 1.33 milliseconds per century, significantly higher than at any other time in the 20th century. So that was it. That's what it's all leading to. It's making the day longer. It's a big problem. Big enough problem. We need a study about it, we need a CNN headline about it. And how is it affecting the day? Well, it's making the day longer by. Well, it's not even the day. It's. It's increasing by 1.33 milliseconds per century. So by my quick napkin calculation here, with time changing this quickly due to climate change, a day will be a full second longer in about 90,000 years. Right? I think that's, that's how it works out. So 90,000 years from now, people, if there's any people left on Earth, are going to be just. Days will be eternal. They're going to linger on forever. The day will never end. Days will drag on and on and on for a full second longer. They'll have to, they'll have to endure that additional second per day in 90,000 years about. But this is actually a perfect example of what we were just discussing, that it may seem like you have to be crazy to believe that to believe in all the apocalyptic predictions that we hear constantly about climate change. It may seem like only a nutcase would believe this stuff, but that's not true. All you have to be is someone who is surrounded by, by the propaganda all the time, has no real out, you know, doesn't have anyone in their life who's a voice of sanity, not anybody that they listen to anyway. And, and you know, on top of that, be. Not be someone who's, who's not exactly a critical thinker. That's all. And that describes like a lot of people. You don't have to be a maniac. And if you're in that group and you see a headline like this, and of course you don't read on, you don't keep reading and do the math and all that. They don't want you to do that. Just the headline's all you need. It's even affecting our perception of time. That's how bad climate change is. An entire second in 90,000 years.