Alarmed White House Holds Disaster Press Conference

Summary

The MeidasTouch Podcast Summary: "Alarmed White House Holds Disaster Press Conference"

Release Date: March 19, 2025

---

Introduction

In this episode of The MeidasTouch Podcast, hosted by the Meiselas brothers—Ben, Brett, and Jordy Meiselas—the discussion revolves around a tumultuous White House press conference held by Caroline Levitt, the press secretary under President Donald Trump. The brothers dissect Levitt's performance, highlighting her perceived lack of preparedness and credibility, and delve into broader issues surrounding the administration's policies and their implications on democracy and governance.

---

Critique of White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt

The episode kicks off with a critical analysis of Caroline Levitt's handling of the press conference. Ron Filipkowski, one of the hosts, expresses frustration with Levitt's apparent misinformation and lack of research:

“Caroline Levitt, who calls herself a press secretary, is just so sloppy and unprepared. Her press conferences like the one today are always just so disastrous.” (00:00)

Misrepresentation of Judicial Appointments

Filipkowski points out Levitt's inaccuracies regarding Judge Boasberg's appointment:

“Judge Boasberg was originally appointed by George W. Bush and then elevated by Barack Obama.” (00:53)

Levitt inaccurately labels Boasberg as an Obama-appointed judge, ignoring his initial appointment by a Republican president. This misrepresentation underscores a pattern of partisanship in her statements.

Inadequate Responses to Press Inquiries

Levitt's evasiveness is further highlighted when asked about the termination of a program tracking Ukrainian children trafficked by Russia:

“I have no updates about that or that specific program at this time.” (02:16)

Filipkowski criticizes her inability to provide substantive answers while simultaneously attacking judicial figures:

“You think you're going to distract us by releasing the 2023 JFK files and just changing the number to 2025 instead of 2023...” (01:03)

Attacks on Judicial Impartiality

Levitt continues her critique of the judiciary, accusing judges of being partisan activists:

“They are trying to clearly slow walk this administration's agenda and it's unacceptable.” (09:32)

Filipkowski counters by detailing Judge Boasberg's extensive experience and bipartisan appointment history, further questioning Levitt's credibility.

---

Deportation Policies and Transparency Issues

A significant portion of the press conference addressed the administration's deportation of Venezuelan individuals to El Salvador. Reporters queried the criteria for determining gang membership or terrorism links, as well as the lack of transparency in identifying deportees.

Lack of Operational Transparency

Levitt reiterates the administration's stance on operational secrecy:

“We are not going to reveal operational details about a counterterrorism operation.” (03:50)

Filipkowski challenges this by highlighting the inconsistency in releasing multimedia evidence while withholding basic information about the individuals deported.

Constitutional and Due Process Concerns

The discussion raises concerns about constitutional rights and due process, with Filipkowski emphasizing the importance of transparency and legal standards:

“We have a constitution and due process here. Next, I want to show you this reporter then attacks the mainstream media and then praises Derek Chauvin.” (04:47)

---

Discussion on Derek Chauvin and Judicial Fairness

Another contentious topic is the debate over Derek Chauvin's trial and potential pardon. A Trump supporter questions the fairness of Chauvin's trial, suggesting political bias and media complicity:

“They chose to ignore the autopsy report... They decided to slander Derek Chauvin as a racist cop instead.” (05:28)

Levitt responds by stating that the president is not considering a pardon:

“The president has been asked and answered this question. He said it's not something he's considering at this time.” (06:06)

Filipkowski criticizes Levitt for seemingly endorsing Chauvin, whom many view as responsible for George Floyd's death, thereby questioning the administration's stance on justice and accountability.

---

Federal Reserve's Economic Projections

The episode transitions to economic discussions, focusing on Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell's press conference. Powell addresses the impact of tariffs on inflation and economic growth:

“The median participant projects GDP to rise 1.7 this year, somewhat lower than projected in December, and to rise a bit below 2% over the next two years.” (14:13)

Filipkowski interprets this as an indictment of the Trump administration's economic policies:

“Federal Reserve holds Interest Rates Steady as Tariffs Inflation Blurs the path ahead. You mean that Trump is crashing the economy?” (14:58)

This segment highlights concerns about the sustainability of economic growth under the current administration's tariff strategy and its broader implications on national and global markets.

---

Conclusion

The Meiselas brothers encapsulate their critique of the Trump administration by highlighting perceived mismanagement and lack of transparency in both communication and policy implementation. By dissecting Caroline Levitt's press conference and juxtaposing it with broader economic and judicial issues, the podcast underscores the challenges facing democracy and governance within the current political climate.

Notable Quotes:

• Ron Filipkowski: “Caroline Levitt... is just so sloppy and unprepared.” (00:00)

• Caroline Levitt: “We are not going to reveal operational details about a counterterrorism operation.” (03:50)

• Federal Reserve Chairman Powell: “The median participant projects GDP to rise 1.7 this year...” (14:13)

• Ron Filipkowski: “Federal Reserve holds Interest Rates Steady as Tariffs Inflation Blurs the path ahead.” (14:58)

---

Insights and Conclusions

The episode serves as a critical examination of the Trump administration's communication strategies and policy decisions. By highlighting inconsistencies and perceived partisanship in Levitt's statements, the hosts emphasize the importance of accountability and transparency in government operations. Additionally, the discussion on economic projections reveals underlying concerns about the administration's impact on the nation's financial health. Overall, the podcast advocates for informed and democratic support to uphold the integrity of governmental institutions and processes.

---

For listeners unfamiliar with this episode, The MeidasTouch Podcast offers a blend of humor, in-depth analysis, and passionate discourse on pressing political issues, making complex topics accessible and engaging.

Transcript

[Ron Filipkowski]

Donald Trump's chief propagandist, Caroline Levitt, who calls herself a press secretary, is just so sloppy and unprepared. Her press conferences like the one today are always just so disastrous. Caroline, I know you don't do your research. I don't know, maybe just go on Wikipedia for some of these judges before you attack them. Like here, Caroline Levitt says, oh, this Obama appointed activist D.C. judge and the judge's wife. They're going after Donald Trump. Caroline, the judge was first appointed by George W. Bush, a Republican. Here, play this clip.

[Caroline Levitt]

In this judge, Judge Boasberg is a Democrat activist. He was appointed by Barack Obama. His wife has donated more than $10,000 to Democrats and he has consistently shown his disdain for this president and his policies. And it's unacceptable.

[Federal Reserve Chairman Powell]

You took me right where I wanted to go about the idea that these people are all foreign terrorists. But Judge Boseberg was originally appointed by George W. Bush and then elevated by Barack Obama. I just feel like I should.

[Caroline Levitt]

Well, let me just.

[Ron Filipkowski]

She just doesn't know anything. And by the way, to have a press secretary from the White House attacking the judge's wife after Chief Justice John Roberts also put out a public statement for Donald Trump to stop attacking federal judges if he doesn't like their orders. She's attacking the wife of the judge, but that's very Trumpy. Here. Caroline Levitt is asked another question which she doesn't know the answer to about. Has the White House shut down the program whereby the United States, through this research institute, finds Ukrainian children who are being trafficked by Russia? Here, play this clip.

[Caroline Levitt]

Annie, go ahead.

[Reporter]

Thanks so much. In the statement that you read, you referenced the president's interest in helping return Ukrainian children to their parents, to their families. There's an organization that provides intelligent information about those children that has their aid has been cut. It's a Yale University program that used foreign aid. And I'm curious if as part of this new thinking with Ukraine, that aid might be unfrozen.

[Caroline Levitt]

I have no updates about that or that specific program at this time. Karen.

[Ron Filipkowski]

Oh, you don't have answers to that, Caroline, as Greg Sargent, great reporter, says, the White House press secretary was just asked about the termination of this program that tracks Ukrainian children abducted by Russia. Why in the world would Donald Trump terminate that program? She goes, oh, I have no updates about that. Oh, by the way, Caroline, where are the Epstein files? You think you're going to distract us by releasing the 2023 JFK files and just changing the number to 2025 instead of 2023, you got Joe Rogan saying, has anyone fed the JFK files to Grok? So who killed jfk? There's not a conspiracy that that moron won't chase. Sorry, back to Caroline. I digress. Back to Caroline Levitt. She's asked here by a reporter, can you provide any more details on how authorities have determined if these Venezuelan individuals who you put in concentration camps in El Salvador are gang members or terrorists or what's your criteria for sending these people? If you're going to show their faces on these ISIS style videos? What's your evidence that they committed crimes? Play this clip back to those deportation.

[Another Reporter]

Flights to El Salvador. Can the administration provide any more details on how authorities determine that each of those men were in fact members of a gang? And if the White House can publish images, photos, videos of those men, why can't the administration just release basic information like their identities and names?

[Caroline Levitt]

We are not going to reveal operational details about a counterterrorism operation. But what I can assure you, as I said on Monday, we have the highest degree of confidence in our ICE agents and our Customs and Border Patrol agents who have committed their lives to targeting illegal criminals in our country, particularly foreign terrorists. And they had great evidence and indication. They have the highest degree of professionalism and they were 100% confident in the individuals that were sent home on these flights and in the President's executive authority to do that.

[Another Reporter]

Follow up, I know in the last briefing you cited privacy concerns as a reason why the administration may not be able to reveal the identities. What exactly are the privacy rights of immigrants who were deported that the administration says were dangerous enough to be sent to El Salvador and sent in a prison?

[Caroline Levitt]

Again, as I just said, we're not going to reveal the operational details of a counter terrorism operation for quite obvious reasons, we're trying to combat terrorism here in the United States of America.

[Advertiser]

Jeff.

[Ron Filipkowski]

Oh, we're not going to give operational update. Why don't you just list their names? Why don't you say who they are? Why don't you list the crime that they committed? No. You're willing to put their faces on screen in videos where they're kicked and punched by El Salvador military and you're not going to just say what their name is and what they did? I mean, this is the United States of America. I mean, I'm a law and order guy, but we have a constitution and due process here. Next, I want to show you this reporter then attacks the mainstream media and then praises Derek Chauvin. Play this clip, Terry Levitt Some prominent.

[Trump Supporter]

Trump supporters have been making the case that Derek Chauvin deserves a pardon. They argue that he did not receive a fair trial. Joe Biden, Biden and other Democrats actually implied that he was guilty while the trial was going on. BLM rioters had these jurors under immense threat and pressure. Mainstream media, frankly, many news outlets here today chose are complicit here. They chose to ignore the autopsy report. They chose to ignore the full body camera footage. They decided to slander Derek Chauvin as a racist cop instead. Does the administration believe Derek Chauvin received a fair trial and will they consider a pardon moving forward?

[Caroline Levitt]

The president has been asked and answered this question. He said it's not something he's considering at this time.

[Ron Filipkowski]

Philip praising Derek Chauvin who murdered George Floyd as our editor in chief, Ron Philip Koski says great idea Trump regime for letting all these right wing nut cases into the briefing room to make speeches and turn this all into an infowars episode. So ridiculous. And by the way, here's another clip though of a real reporter, Rachel Scott to Levitt saying, okay, look, if y'all are publishing these images and photos then of these Venezuelans, just you can't say what they did here. Play this clip back to those deportation.

[Another Reporter]

Flights to El Salvador. Can the administration provide any more details on how authorities determine that each of those men were in fact members of a gang? And if the White House can publish images, photos, videos of those men, why can't the administration just release basic information like their identities and names?

[Caroline Levitt]

We are not going to reveal operational details, details about a counterterrorism operation. But what I can assure you, as I said on Monday, we have the highest degree of confidence in our ICE agents and our Customs and Border Patrol agents who have committed their lives to targeting illegal criminals in our country, particularly foreign terrorists. And they had great evidence and indication. They have the highest degree of professionalism and they were 100% confident in the individuals that were sent home on these flights and in the president's executive authority to do that follow up.

[Advertiser]

I know the older I get, the more I find myself wanting to be more intentional about the way I live, eat and take care of my body. That's why I'm so happy I found mosh. Mosh, which you may have heard about on Shark Tank, was founded by Maria Shriver and her son Patrick Schwarzenegger, with a simple mission, to create a conversation about brain health through food, education and research. Maria's father suffered from Alzheimer's, and since then she and Patrick have dedicated themselves to finding ways to help other families dealing with this debilitating disease. MASH joined forces with the world's top scientists and functional nutritionists to go beyond your average protein bar with eight delicious flavors including a plant based one in peanut butter and chocolate. Each Mach Bar is made with ingredients that support brain health like Ashwagandha, lion's mane, collagen and omega 3s. And now Mach bars come with a new look and new formulation featuring a game changing brain boosting ingredient that you won't find in any other bar. MASH is now the first and only food brand boosted with Cognizant, a premium nootropic that supplies the brain with a patent form of C Choline. But here's the best part. To make you feel good, MASH donates a portion of all proceeds from your order to fund gender based brain health research through the Women's Alzheimer's movement. Why gender based? Because 2/3 of all Alzheimer's patients are women. MASH is working closely to close the gap between women and men's health research. Personally, I love the taste of my Mosh bars. My favorite is the peanut butter crunch which I have each morning before I head off to the gym. Now, if you want to find ways to give back to others and fuel your body and your brain, Mosh bars are the perfect choice for you. Head to moshlife.com midas to save 20% off plus free shipping on the bestseller trial pack that's 20% off plus free shipping on THE bestsellers trial pack at M-O-S-H-L-I f e.com midas thank you Mosh for sponsoring this episode.

[Ron Filipkowski]

So then there's more Attacking Judges by Caroline Levitt, who has no clue what she's even talking about at play, to.

[Caroline Levitt]

Point out that the judges in this country are acting erroneously. We have judges who are acting as partisan activists from the bench. They are trying to dictate policy from the President of the United States. They are trying to clearly slow walk this administration's agenda and it's unacceptable. As the President said last night, we will continue to comply with the these court orders. We will continue to fight these battles in courts. But it's incredibly apparent that there is a concerted effort by the far left to judge shop to pick judges who are clearly acting as partisan activists from the bench in an attempt to derail this President's agenda. We will not allow that to happen. And not only are they usurping the will of the President and the Chief executive of our country. But they are undermining the will of the American public, tens of millions of Americans who duly elected this president to implement the policy policies that are coming out of this White House. One more question. Senate minority leaders.

[Ron Filipkowski]

And here she uses her podium from the White House to beg the Supreme Court for help to reign in, quote, activist judges. Activist judges. Chief Judge Boseberg is the chief judge in Washington, D.C. before being the chief federal judge in Washington, D.C. he was the chief judge of the FISA courts. So he knows a little bit about federal intelligence, I mean, and foreign intelligence, rather. And then before that, he was a D.C. judge, a state, a district court judge from the district that is appointed by George W. Bush. But more attacks on the judge next. I'll show you right here. Caroline Levitz asked, how do you determine if a judge is bad? Watch her response.

[Caroline Levitt]

Understanding. And that's the truth.

[Another Reporter]

And if I could ask a question about the judge as well. How does a president define a bad judge? So just someone who disagrees with him. And is that a dangerous precedent in this case because this is a temporary ruling from Judge Boasberg that he could ultimately rule in your favor? Is he setting up a standard here for calling for the impeachment of a judge who may ultimately rule on your side?

[Caroline Levitt]

No. It has nothing to do with disagreeing with the president on policy. It's with disagreeing with the Constitution and the law. And it's trying to usurp the authority of the executive branch of this country. It's having baseless reasoning for these injunctions. And it's a clear effort by these judges to slow roll this president's agenda.

[Ron Filipkowski]

And she's then asked about Donald Trump unlawfully terminating the ftc, the Democratic FTC commissioners, and more lies from her. She goes, of course she has the authority to do it. He doesn't have the authority. Let's play it.

[Caroline Levitt]

Go ahead. Thank you.

[Reporter]

On the ftc, two quick questions. Can you explain the president's thinking in his decision to fire the two Democratic commissioners, especially given that Marcus Mark Nutter is on track to be confirmed next week and there would be a Republican majority.

[Caroline Levitt]

My biggest question is, why now?

[Reporter]

Sure.

[Caroline Levitt]

Because the time was right to let these people go. And the president absolutely has the authority to do it. And they were given ample notice in a letter that I believe your outlet reported on. So it pretty much explains exactly why this administration chose to let those individuals go. Is the ultimate goal to get this.

[Reporter]

To the Supreme Court, to try to overturn the 1935 precedent?

[Caroline Levitt]

The goal was to let these individuals go. If we have to fight it all the way to the Supreme Court, we certainly will.

[Ron Filipkowski]

Rachel Caroline Levitt is then asked if it was Donald Trump himself that asked for the airplanes that had these Venezuelans to keep going to El Salvador after it was known that there was a court order requiring them to return to the United States and be given due process. Play this clip Deportation Flight so was.

[Trump Supporter]

It the president himself who directed the.

[Ron Filipkowski]

Planes to stay in the air after.

[Trump Supporter]

The judge ordered them to turn back?

[Caroline Levitt]

The president signed the alien, invoked the Aliens Enemies act with a proclamation which then directed the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of State to move forward with the plan of action. And as I said yesterday, all of the planes that were subject to the judge's written order took off before the order was submitted in court. I was asked and answered that question multiple times yesterday. Kate, go ahead.

[Ron Filipkowski]

While the Caroline Levitt press conference was taking place, there was another press conference taking place by the Federal Reserve Chairman Powell. Here he is right here. And he and for the Fed sharply reduced their 2025 growth projections. They're keeping interest rates the same because they're reducing growth projections and they believe the tariffs are going to cause more inflation. Here's what Federal Reserve Chairman Powell had to say.

[Federal Reserve Chairman Powell]

Let's play it do think with the arrival of of the tariff inflation, further progress may be delayed. The SEP doesn't really show further downward progress on inflation this year and that that's really due to the tariffs coming in.

[Ron Filipkowski]

And here he talks about how the Fed is now projecting just 1.7% GDP growth. That's the median when it was expected to be much higher. Had Donald Trump just literally done nothing and just allowed former President Biden's economy to just continue on?

[Federal Reserve Chairman Powell]

Play this clip in our summary of economic projections, the median participant projects GDP to rise 1.7 this year, somewhat lower than projected in December, and to rise a bit below 2% over the next two years.

[Ron Filipkowski]

Here's the headline that comes out of this meeting. Federal Reserve holds Interest Rates Steady as Tariffs Inflation Blurs the path ahead. Blurs the path ahead. You mean that Trump is crashing the economy? That's another way of saying that. Let me know what you think. Hit subscribe. Let's get to 5 million subscribers. And thanks for watching.

[Advertiser]

Can't get enough Midas? Check out the Midas plus substack for ad Free articles, reports, podcasts, daily recaps from Ron Filipkowski and more. Sign up for free [e-mail].