D (3:53)

Right.

C (3:53)

Kamala Harris by point. But look at where we are now. According to an NBC News survey monkey poll, Kamala Harris wins in a redo. And asking folks essentially if you could redo the 2024 election, how would you vote? She wins it by, get this, eight points. A massive shift from what we saw back in November of 2024 when Donald Trump won by a point. And I will note that this sample was weighted, weighted to the 2024 result in which Donald Trump won by a point. But yet Kamala Harris in this reweight, it's in this weighted sample. Get this, she wins by 8amongst the sample that voted for Trump by 1.

D (4:31)

So good news is Kamala Harris for her wins the 24 election.

A (4:34)

The bad news is it's actually 2026, so it doesn't count for her. What about, though, the 2026 midterms when we're talking about Trump voters and then also Harris voters?

C (4:44)

Okay, so you see this and as John was laughing about, the fact is the 2024 election is good, gone, goodbye. But it has a massive impact, this voter sentiment, on what may happen later this year. Why do I say that? Because let's take a look at the vote for Congress and this is very important. All right, 2024 Harris voters, they vote for the Democrats on average by, get this, 89 points. The Trump voters mostly stick by the Republicans, but by a significantly smaller margin by 83 points. This means that the Democratic base that voted for Kamala Harris is sticking with those congressional Democratic candidates to a much greater degree than those Trump voters are sticking with the Republican candidates for Congress. And that is why what you're seeing on that generic congressional ballot is Democrats leaping ahead by this point by about five points. Because at least at this point, the Trump voters are not sticking by the Republicans as much as the Harris voters are sticking by the Democrats.

D (5:39)

Yeah, and these numbers may not look that different, but this five points, which is roughly what that is, that really.

A (5:44)

Could be hugely important come November.

D (5:46)

This is people who did vote in 2024. What about those perhaps who did not.

C (5:51)

Okay, so part of the equation, right, is that the Harris voters are really sticking with those Democratic candidates to more so than the, than the Trump voters are sticking with the Republican candidates. But it's more than that. It's also people coming off of the sideline, okay? Voters choice for election for the 2026 congressional elections, if they didn't vote in 2024, look at this. Democrats are winning that vote by a significant margin, by 16 percentage points. So you add on to that, and.

A (6:20)

You add on to that, you add on to that the independent voters who are overwhelmingly swimming, swinging away from Donald Trump. And the question is why? And I think one of the, I think we know the, the answer, but I think one of the great articles that came out recently was from Semaphore by Ben Smith, host of the Mixed Signals podcast and co founder and editor in chief of Semin for How Trump's Politics Return to Earth. They identify some of the main factors here and kind of Donald Trump's fall. Now, real videos, the ice, Border Patrol Gestapo videos that people are capturing of Trump terrorizing and this Border Patrol terrorizing the people in this country. The Epstein disaster, obviously, the COVID up of the Epstein files, the continued cover up and Donald Trump claiming he's vindicated, while there are lots of people in his regime who are mentioned and certainly doesn't seem like vindication would be putting it lightly. And the American people are horrified at what they're seeing and rightfully so. And Trump's attempt at capturing the media really hasn't gone as plan. I mean, yeah, we see what's going on on cbs. Obviously you have Fox and other media bending the knee, but I think you have independent news also rising and people are getting their information from places like the Midas Touch Network, like Semaphore and other places. So let's bring in Ben Smith. Ben, it's great to see you right there. I showed you what was going on in Dusseldorf, but I didn't need to show you in Dusseldorf what's going on right here in Peoria. What's happening in the United States is something astonishing. And I know you as a, as a reporter, political observer for so many years. I mean, this is, you know, there's definitely something going on right now, which is why you wrote the article. That is not hyperbolic, I don't think, to talk about, you know, Trump, Trump really, you know, descending right now, as Enten says, to new lows. What do you make about it?

D (8:12)

Yeah, I don't think, I don't think Trump is going to win the Dusseldorf Merrill election this November. But more broadly, the thing about Trump is he is this bizarre political phenomenon who seems to play by none of the rules that we grew up thinking about how politics works. And when he arrived on the scene, everybody said he was going to lose and he won. And I think. And yet at the same time, there are these other periods where he's sort of behaving exactly like any other political figure. And actually having the first year of a presidency feel like this massive sea change in the direction of the country in which the President has absolutely reshaped everything and then you get to the second year and that all collapses is like the most familiar pattern in American government. And you know, Trump's numbers are somewhat worse, I think in the polling. Nate Silver has a little worse than Biden's were at this point of time, a little worse than his own numbers were eight years ago, which is, you know, pretty bad, but within the norms of the second year of a president bad. And I think one of the really interesting things is how much of what we thought was happening last year turns out to be wrong. I mean, I think there was this idea that we were post truth specifically that kind of the combination of these hyper partisan social media environment and AI was going to mean everybody would live in this kind of closed bubble and nothing would crack through that. If you didn't like the reality you saw, somebody would make you a video showing a different one. I just don't think that's really happened. I was worried, worried about that. But I think if, particularly around the ice stuff, you know, what broke through was the reality of these videos. And it broke through, you know, including to the White House, which is now pulled out of Minneapolis. But I, but I do think, I don't think anybody thought, oh, like the big story of 2026 is going to be like real videos on social media which just change everybody's minds about reality. Like, I think that was a, in a weird way, kind of an unexpected plot twist. And that to me is actually in some ways the thing that everybody got most wrong. The idea that Trump had created this new epistemic universe. You know, I think we often overrate the power of our politicians.

A (10:27)

Right. Well, he was certainly trying, you know, and when we saw the real videos, whether it was Renee, Nicole Goode, Alex Pretty or the countless others, it followed a repeated pattern. And it's interesting that we're recording this on the day where Trisha McLaughlin announced is her resignation or that she's departing, they claim this has been in the works since December, but who the hell really knows with them? But the pattern is Trisha McLaughlin. Christy. No, you know, whoever. They come out and they say, you know, this is a domestic terrorist. They try to bend the reality of what it is. And then that's reported as first as the truth. And then the video comes out, and then different angles of the video come out. And then people are like, yeah, but you just said that we're watching the video. And then they go, yeah, but that's not really what happened in the video. And then they kind of. And I think this is what you talked about in the article as well. They then had to basically, like, with the pretty video, somewhat walk it back and say, well, now we're doing an investigation. And then it falls into the ether. But they. They tried to bend the reality of what's happening, don't you think, Elise?

D (11:39)

You know, I think. I think people did think it was working. I mean, you know, I think that that's sort of the perception of that first hundred days, the flooding, the zone, the shock and awe, and, you know, that magic, whatever it was, has just totally worn off. And I think the Trump people to some degree, persuaded themselves that they could shape reality, that they could, you know, on, particularly on X, just reshape people's perceptions of what was actually happening. You know, it reminds me so much of the Bush years. There was this famous line that, you know, that the Bush administration gave, I believe, to like, a GQ reporter, that they were. They didn't need that. The power of the United States was such, you know, the Bush administration, that they could reshape reality. They didn't need to respond to it. And I do think that the best analogy right here is for, at least in my own experience covering politics, is this just feels so much like 2006 when you had the Iraq war, which had been the, you know, the great initiative of the Bush administration. The fight for freedom was what made Bush popular. It got him reelected in a certain way, had become so intensely unpopular. And you had this advisor, Donald Rumsfeld, who became seen as the kind of central figure of the administration and who resigned the day after the midterms. And I don't know if, you know, it's not really Trump's style to push people out, but I would think there's just enormous pressure on Stephen Miller right now. And I don't know if he resigns before the midterms, resigns after the midterms, sticks around. But I think that's to Me, it's sort of that moment where the President put a lot of confidence in one advisor to steer national policy in a direction that's been politically disastrous.

A (13:09)

Right. You know, but Bush still had conventional political figures around him who still made conventional political moves, even if they expressed that kind of bravado. I mean, you know, when Trump was confronted with the fact that Howard Lutnick said he had never been to or never spoken with Epstein because he was so disgusting after one interaction, then, you know, brought his fricking children to the. To the island and then. And then did a business deal with Epstein, and Trump's asked about it. Trump's like, yeah, he brought his family. That's. He brought. He brought his kids, as far as I know. And the American people like, yeah, that's the problem. He brought his kids to the island where the children were sex trafficked. That's. That's the issue of the judgment here. And so, you know, you talk about the Epstein files in your article. His handling of that has been so botched and so destructive, and every day it just feels like he's further and further not. I mean, obviously he's alienated people who despise him, but even his own base is like, what, like you're saying you're vindicated? What are you talking about?

D (14:21)

Yeah, no, I think, I mean, the Epstein files, I mean, one of the really great political mistakes I've ever seen was Pam Bondi and Dan Bongino and Kash Patel, who, I guess they sort of weren't in that on the joke. Like, Trump liked to talk about the Epstein files, liked to kind of throw at his mud, at his enemies. But also, of course, he knew that he'd been close friends with Jeffrey Epstein for years, by the way, no serious allegation that Trump ever committed a crime. That's not. That is not in the files. But the association with Epstein right now, politically, it's just. It's like an oil spill. Like, you can't get it off you once it's on you. And, I mean, I can only imagine what Trump was thinking when his. These trusted aides of his went and said, you know, we're going to release all the emails. This is going to become the centerpiece of American law enforcement. We're going to divert the FBI and these US Attorneys from immigration cases, from everything else to redact Epstein files. When, of course, Trump was going to be all over them. Of course he knew that. He'd known Epstein for years. They were friendly. That's been why that was widely reported before he ran for president. It was all over the tabloids. And so just an unbelievable kind of unforced error by, by his team to kind of totally derail, I think his, his second term by just dropping this, you know, giant bucket of allegations basically on his, on Trump's head. And he can't really say, I'm going to fire anybody who's been, who has a connection with Epstein because obviously Trump has a, had a closer relationship with Epstein than Lutnick or than anybody else here.

A (15:49)

You know, you mentioned there that there's, you know, regarding the Epstein files, that there may not be anything in the files, that there certainly are lots. Let's be. I think there are lots of allegations that are made against Donald Trump in the files that were never investigated by the FBI and doj. I mean, we see the allegations there, whether they're corroborated or uncorroborated, they were never investigated. And I think a lot of people have concern about that. But look, I think what people are recognizing.

D (16:17)

Well, let me, I just, I actually, just for what it's worth, I disagree with you on that. I mean, you think the Biden Justice Department participated in a years long cover up of Donald Trump's crimes? I think these are this huge jump of files that were probably, they were part of one of the biggest investigations in American history. And the reason nobody got indicted is because they couldn't find anybody to indict.

A (16:36)

Well, I think that there was an act.

D (16:38)

I realized this may be a dissenting view.

A (16:40)

No, look, I appreciate dissenting views, but let's, you know, I think it's a, I think it's a healthy debate to have. So, you know, one of the things that I think is important is this undisputed fact and you could push back if you think it's true or not. Mar A Lago, was it a site where child sex trafficking took place? Like true or false?

D (17:04)

I mean, I just, I mean, I guess I, I think that they're just the allegations being thrown around the Epstein files. You just gotta really root them in evidence. And I, I just see no reason to believe that the f. That the Biden FBI was involved in an extensive cover up of crimes at Mar A Lago. That just seems unlikely to me.

A (17:20)

Well, I mean, I think that Virginia Giuffre was somebody who was at Mar A Lago who was sex trafficked when she was underage. And there was the ongoing case and the appeals against Ghislaine. And then Donald Trump has been found civilly liable for sexual Assault, Right.

D (17:37)

Yeah. I feel like you're trying to turn me into Donald Trump's lawyer here, Ben.

A (17:40)

I'm not trying to turn you into. I'm not trying to turn you into his lawyer. To me, there's a lot of. No matter whether it was Biden, whether it was, you know, Trump won, whether it was Obama, where it was George W. Bush, you know, I'm not trying to turn you to anything. I just think that there are no.

D (18:00)

But I think we can probably agree that, like, the people around Trump really should have known better than to unseal this particular Pandora's box, which just flew right into their own faces and just really an incredible way.

A (18:14)

Well, you know, I think. You know, I think that they have a lot of explaining to do. I don't think Lutnick's explanations are great. I don't think the fact that Steve Bannon was having all of these conversations, you know, was great. You know, I think that it was. It raises a lot of serious questions. And look, I think that the American people, you know, are looking. Who's in control now? Who's the people saying, release it? They're the ones. There's a lot of documents that haven't been released. And. And I think we'll just. We'll leave it at. There's a lot of questions that need to be answered.

D (18:44)

Yeah. And I think they're questions that, I mean, I think partly because Trump genuinely, admittedly, publicly had this friendship with Epstein, it just becomes. It's just so hard for him to ever disentangle from this. I mean, it's just a sort of unsolvable political problem for him, I think.

A (18:59)

No doubt. Everybody take a read at Ben Smith's article in Semaphore. Check it out. And make sure you all check out the podcast as well. Mixed signals. Thanks, Ben, so much for joining us.

D (19:10)

Thank you so much.

A (19:12)

Want to stay plugged in? Become a subscriber to our substack@midasplus.com you'll get daily recaps from Ron Filipkowski ad free episodes of our podcast, and more exclusive content Only available@midasplus.com. We're lost.

B (19:30)

I'm gonna pull over and ask that man for directions.

D (19:33)

Hi there.

B (19:33)

We're looking to get to the campground.

D (19:35)

Well, you're gonna take a left at the old oak tree end of this here road. No, I'm just kidding. Let me get my phone out.

B (19:41)

How are you getting a signal out here?

D (19:42)

T Mobile and US Cellular decided to merge, so the network out here is Huge. We're getting the same great signal as the city and saving a boatload with all the benefits. Oh, and a five year price guarantee. Okay, here's those directions.

B (19:54)

Actually, can you point us in the direction of a T Mobile store?

A (19:57)

America's best network just got bigger. Swiss switch to T Mobile today and.

C (20:01)

Get built in benefits the other guys leave out. Plus our five year price guarantee.

A (20:06)

And now T Mobile is available in US Cellular stores. Best mobile network based on analysis by Ookle of Speed test intelligence data at 2H 2025 bigger network. The combination of T Mobile's and US cellular network footprints will enhance the T Mobile network's coverage price guarantee on talk, text and data exclusions like taxes and fees apply. CT T mobile.com for details.

B (20:28)

Hey y'.

A (20:29)

All.

B (20:29)

As a growing family, my husband and I love game night. Especially when it's Wayfair edition.

A (20:34)

Let's do it. You gotta name as many Wayfair furniture and decor categories as you can. Ready?

D (20:39)

Go.

B (20:40)

Sofas, bar stools, beds, ottomans, outdoor seating, bookshelves, kitchen tables, garden sheds, mid century modern lamps.

D (20:47)

Time. Nice.

A (20:49)

You got nine out of a lot. Not too bad. Keep practicing by visiting Wayfair.com where you can shop every style for every home.

D (20:56)

Wayfair Every style, every home.

A (20:58)

Well, the holidays have come and gone once again. But if you've forgotten to get that special someone in your life a gift, well, Mint Mobile is extending their holiday offer of half off unlimited wireless. So here's the idea. You get it now, you call it an early present for next year.

C (21:13)

What do you have to lose?

A (21:15)

Give it a try@mintmobile.com Switch limited time.

B (21:18)

50% off regular price for new customers. Upfront payment required. $45 for three months, $90 for six months or $180 for 12 month plan. Taxes and fees. Extra speeds may slow after 50 gigabytes per month when network is busy.

A (21:27)

See terms.