Loading summary
T-Mobile Representative
Summer fun goes great with family freedom From T Mobile we'll pay off four phones up to $3200 and give you four free phones all on America's largest 5G network. Visit your local T Mobile location or learn more@t mobile.com familyfreedom. Up to $800 per line via virtual prepaid card typically takes 15 days. Free phones via 24 monthly bill credits with finance agreement eg Apple iPhone16128 gigabyte 82999 eligible trade in eg iPhone11 Pro for well qualified credits end and balance due. If you pay off earlier cancel contact.
Host/Commentator
T Mobile this is one of the.
Venue Representative
Most spectacular venues with all kinds of character and hospitality scenery. These people in this git attach valley they love when you come to see what they have to offer.
JJ Hurst
I'm JJ Hurst, Ellensburg Rodeo Clown and I want to invite you to the rodeo. Come hang out with us in Ellensburg. Great rodeo, great time. Two performances on Saturday. One is the Extreme Bulls of the Year event. Do not miss The Ellensburg Rodeo August 29th through September 1st.
Jay Inslee
See you there.
AT&T Business Representative
And now a next level moment from ATT Business. Say you've sent out a gigantic shipment of pillows and they need to be there in time for International Sleep day. You've got AT and T5G so you're fully confident, but the vendor isn't responding and International Sleep Day is tomorrow. Luckily, AT&T 5G lets you deal with any issues with ease so the pillows will get delivered and everyone can sleep soundly, especially you. AT&T 5G requires a compatible plan and device. Coverage not available everywhere. Learn more@att.com 5G Network.
Host/Commentator
Donald Trump's cabinet members making appearances on Fox and other right wing channels making complete fools of themselves on such critical issues. I just want to show you this. This is Donald Trump's Energy Secretary, Chris Wright. Let me just play this clip for you. Utterly humiliating and dangerous. Here, play this first clip.
News Anchor
The Department of Energy, meanwhile, released its climate report assessing the impact of greenhouse gas emissions. It includes carbon dioxide induced warming may be less damaging than previously believed, which many people expected. The DOE is receiving pushback, however, from the New York Times. The Times writes that the Energy Department is attacking climate science in contentious reports. Secretary, your reaction?
Chris Wright
What a crazy headline. But I guess that's par for the course for the New York Times. In fact, we're doing the exact opposite. We're exposing the American people and the broader scientific community to what actually is in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports Not the hyperbolic summaries for policymakers or media headlines that claim all sorts of crazy stuff. This is what we actually know. How often do you hear that the planet's getting greener because there's more carbon dioxide in the air, that contributes to increased crop productivity and greater wilderness, Greener wilderness. How often do you hear that deaths from extreme weather had been falling like a stone for a century and that ensured losses from extreme weather events and have been on a multi decadal decline? And those are just facts. Instead, we're scaring kids in school. We're promoting an alarmist view of climate change that simply contrary to the facts, it's a real physical phenomenon that we want to talk about. Honestly.
Host/Commentator
Yeah, those are not the facts. Quite literally, everything he says there is a lie. And you hear him saying climate change is actually great for everybody. I mean, this is. Climate change is an amazing thing. So they're going to put out reports saying that this benefits everybody. I mean, it doesn't get more dystopian than that. Or does it? I mean, here you have Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum celebrating that the Trump regime will eliminate wind and solar power. Energy. Say goodbye to wind and solar. It's just coal, everybody. As other countries are developing multifaceted energy to help them one when it comes to their energy production needs, help their economies, but also help the environment. This is what the Trump regime is saying here. Play this clip.
News Anchor
Are still a lot of wind projects that are moving forward and the ones in the ocean as well, Empire Wind, Vineyard Wind. Are those going to be stopped as a result of this?
Doug Burgum
Well, I think the big thing, Martha, is with the one big beautiful bill has taken a major step forward and finally, after 33 years phasing out these just massive subsidies that were creating essentially tax schemes as opposed to power generation projects for wind and solar. And with the phase out of those, I mean, I think we're going to see almost zero applications for new projects that come in because 60, 70% of the value of a wind project, perhaps even more for offshore wind, which was very expensive, was the value of the tax credit. And of course, we're for president, so.
Host/Commentator
They'Re talking about killing industries. But what is the government going to be subsidizing? What are they focused on? Coal, yes, but also building nuclear reactors on the moon. Here's Sean Duffy, Transportation Secretary, talking about bringing fission to the moon's surface. Here, play this clip.
Sean Duffy
We do have some solar, but if you want sustainable life on the moon, you need an energy source. So we're gonna bring fission to the moon's surface to power our base. It makes complete sense. Now, some might say, well, the launch is somewhat complicated, right? These are not active, they're not live when we, when we launch.
Host/Commentator
All right, enough of that. I mean, I mean quite literally, crazy, crazy, crazy stuff. Let's bring in former Washington governor Jay Inslee. Governor, you're also involved with Climate Power and their accountability project, holding people like that and initiatives like that accountable. First I just want to get your react to what it is that I showed you and then we'll, we'll dig deeper.
Jay Inslee
Well, I guess what I'd say is that they have fully embraced the flat Earth society approach. The next thing I expect is that they will order NASA not to show any photographs of the Earth showing its round because that would distort their flat earth approach. Look, I was a governor and when you're governor you deal with the real world. And the real world for me was trying to take care of the people in Medical Lake and Malden. These are two towns in eastern Washington that totally burned down. Because these wildfires that we're experiencing, that by fact, and if you want to talk about facts, they've increased in double, they've doubled in the last 30 or 40 years in the western United States. It's trying to take care of the flood victims. It's not just Texas, the flood victims. I remember talking to a family that had one flood. They spent a year rebuilding their home and they had a party and the next day they had another flood. Went right through their picture window, tried to take care of them. It's trying to take care of the agricultural people. Look at this is bad for agriculture. Our wine industry is hurt because of the smoke from the forest fires. Gets on our grapes. It then can reduce the quality of our wine. So I really don't know what world they want to live in. You can only explain this in two ways. One, they really just don't give a damn about people's lives who are getting hurt by this, this monster. And two, they think they can hoodwink the American people who are now seeing this. And to me it's just so callous that they could come up to somebody whose home has just been full of mud and tell them that climate change is a good thing, that these floods that are increasing dramatically. And by the way, the billion dollar losses we're having from these extreme climate events have gone up by four or five times in the last Dec and a half. I, so, you know, I guess they Think lion will pay off Ultimately, I don't believe that's the case. Americans are increasingly recognizing the threat that we're facing. So I guess what I'm saying is I worry less about artificial intelligence and more about natural stupidity and deceit, which they're trying to pull over the American people right now.
Host/Commentator
Right. I mean, energy is not limitless. It's, it's, it needs to be harnessed in the right way. And correct me if I'm wrong, on the current path we're going, there is somewhat of an expiration date in terms of if you pursue this path, there's going to start to be lots of energy shortages. And so wind and solar was, however you want to view it, whether a long term solution, a stopgap, medium term solution, in addition to the fact that it brought jobs to communities. When I've spoken to people like Senator Schatz of Hawaii and others who's a big proponent of wind, what they're saying is we're going to look back in five years and there's going to start to be grid outages everywhere, kind of like what we saw in Texas a few years back. And people are going to be like, what happened? Like, we actually need this right now at a time they're talking about putting nuclear fission on the moon, which they're not going to do.
Jay Inslee
Well, we'd like to have some power on Earth, not just here on the moon. It'd be nice if our elected officials thought about getting power to our homes on Earth, not just the moon. And the fact of the matter is, we know electrical demand is going to skyrocket in part because of the energy needs of data centers and our new Internet based system, but just because of the growth of the United States, these brownouts are a real concern. And even when you have this situation where you know or the President should know we need a lot more electricity, does it really make a lot of sense to kneecap, you know, 70% of the new possible energy sources we have, which is also the cheapest energy sources? This is the thing that has always astounded me about Trump. He wants to say he wants to be dominant in energy, but the first thing he wants to do is to basically take, you know, three of the most prominent energy generating sources and making them illegal in the United States. Look, if you need more energy, the dumbest thing to do is to disallow access to wind, solar and advanced batteries, three of the most productive ways of producing a new energy. And yet that is what he's doing. By the way. It's not just reduction of subsidies. I heard one of these speakers say, well, all we're doing is taking away subsidies. That's not all they're doing. They're doing everything humanly possible to make it impossible to build wind power, advanced batteries and solar power. The most recent one is they denied a permit in Idaho of this really significant wind power farm that would really help us in the northwest part of the country avoid these brownouts. It's not just that they took away the subsidy, it took away the permit for no good reason whatsoever. So they're going out of their way every possible way. They have to chop down every, every wind tower and put blackout curtains over every solar panel. And now it's not just access, it's cost. Because these are the least costly in 90% plus of the areas in the United States. These are the, these are the costs that are dramatically cheaper than coal based energy. So it's not only exposing us to more brownouts, he's exposing us. If we can get the electricity, it's going to be more expensive. Over $150 a person in the United States can have higher electrical cost on average as a result of shooting ourselves in the foot. So it's maddening that he is exposing us to the health risks associated with heat domes that killed 150 of my citizens a couple summers ago. It's maddening that he's allowing our homes to burn down across the United States. Shoot. We have a fire burning today in the Olympic national park in the rainforest. This is a place that's called a rainforest, but it's on fire and we can't put it out because it's so dry. We've had two droughts in the last four, four years in my state. And so they don't care about our health, but they also don't care about the cost of our energy because they want to fat in the pockets of their fossil fuel buddies. This really should, should be maddening to every American.
Host/Commentator
You know, and then it feels like it all goes back to some personal grievance Donald Trump had at some point in his life. You know, the windmills that he didn't like being built around his Aberdeen and Turnberry golf courses. That's why he's always hated windmills around there. He likes the idea of climate change bringing the water closer to the Mar A Lago property. He thinks it gives him kind of more exclusive waterfront and beachfront. He's said that in speeches before. So, you know, and it's like what he does with the trade war also, you know, he'll say, you know, in Japan they do some test where they drop a bowling ball, which they don't do on the car. And, and if the car breaks, they put a tariff on an American car. And that's why there's no American cars in Japan, which is, which is false. And you have these ridiculous, you know, to your point, flat earth style pretext and justifications. And then all of these people around him, the enablers then start building the reports and building the junk science, the fake stuff to dismantle things based on. And then they go, it's so crazy that you would say things which are like facts. And then the crazy things they talk about like building nuclear reactors on the moon where people can't even afford groceries, like that's what we want to do and it's just got to stop. I guess I'll leave it. I'm not sure if that's much of a question or me just venting too.
Jay Inslee
Well, it's more of a statement than a question, but I think they're going to have problems with this because they're running into reality. It's people who can't go outside because it's too hot. It's people like in my, in my Seattle, Washington, our kids could not go outside and play two summers because of the smoke. The, it was actually a health hazard to go outside to play. It's people having to abandon their homes on the coast, which is happening, and build their homes up. What I'm saying is that they are running into reality and we need, it's our job. The question is what are we going to do about this? Right. That's the real question. What are you and I and everybody else going to do about it? And what we're going to do, I hope, is to make sure that we use all of our voices to speak against this lunacy, but also make sure that we elect people to Congress November 2026 that are going to push back about this anti science position. Whatever you're partying, you ought to be pro science. And I hope people are now starting to realize November 2026 going to be important in congressional elections so that we can actually get people elected who will put a stop to this craziness to deny science and inexpensive energy. That's our goal and we ought to be doing it. And everybody can play a role in this. To talk about this issue. I'm glad you're talking about it. I talk about, I'm working with this group, Climate Power to try to spread a scientific message on a nonpartisan basis because both parties ought to be working on this. Unfortunately, there's only one. But this is so central to our lives. I'm just so. Now, here's some good news, if I may, because I don't think we should have a discussion without some good news. If, in fact, we get these things built, if we can get Trump's hands off our, our throats on this. The fact of the matter is we are experiencing a clean energy revolution that is so effective it knocks your socks off. Listen, it took us 40 years to build the first terawatt of solar energy. 40 years. Then the next terawatt, it took us only two years. The third terawatt only took us one year. So the pace of growth of renewable energy is extraordinary as long as we get the permits to actually build it, because the technology is fantastic. The price continues to come down, the technology continues to be increased, the efficiency continues to improve. Marrying this with advanced batteries, and we have two of the most advanced battery companies that uses a new silicon anode in the state of Washington. These technologies are incredible. We just need to be able to deploy them and take this guy's foot off of the engine of progress. So there's good news out there as long as we push the go button.
Host/Commentator
Thank you so much as always, Governor Inslee. Thanks for the work you're doing now. And please come back. And if you ever want to write for the Midas Touch substack, it goes out to about a million people. They love these issues.
Jay Inslee
You never know when you're going to get something from me. It'll come in over the transom.
Host/Commentator
Sounds good. Everybody hit subscribe. Let's get to 6 million subscribers. The truth is more important than ever. Check out our new Truth Over Lies collection at store Midas Touch.com All 100% USA Union made.
Podcast Summary: The MeidasTouch Podcast – "Former Governor Jay Inslee Strikes Back at Trump Threats"
Episode Details:
The episode kicks off with the Meiselas brothers fervently criticizing former President Donald Trump's cabinet members for their stance on climate change and energy policies. The hosts express frustration over the administration's approach, labeling it as both "humiliating" and "dangerous."
Key Points:
Chris Wright's Climate Report: The hosts introduce a clip featuring Chris Wright, Trump's Energy Secretary, discussing a Department of Energy (DOE) climate report. Wright claims the DOE is countering what he describes as "hyperbolic summaries" from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Doug Burgum on Renewable Energy: Transitioning to Doug Burgum, the Interior Secretary, the hosts highlight his efforts to dismantle wind and solar power initiatives.
Sean Duffy's Lunar Energy Proposal: The discussion takes a bizarre turn with Sean Duffy, the Transportation Secretary, proposing nuclear reactors on the moon to support lunar bases.
Host Commentary: The hosts vehemently condemn these policies, arguing that they not only hinder the growth of renewable energy but also pose significant risks to environmental stability and public health. They emphasize the irony of promoting fossil fuels while neglecting sustainable alternatives.
Former Washington Governor Jay Inslee joins the podcast to provide a comprehensive rebuttal to the Trump administration's climate policies and to shed light on the real-world implications of these decisions.
Key Points:
Critique of Administration's Approach:
Inslee's Stance (06:03): Inslee derides the administration's policies as akin to the "flat Earth society approach," emphasizing the tangible impacts of climate change on communities.
Impact of Climate Change:
Inslee shares firsthand accounts of wildfires, floods, and their devastating effects on towns like Medical Lake and Malden in Washington. He underscores the increasing frequency and severity of these events, attributing them directly to climate change.
Economic and Agricultural Consequences:
Highlighting the agricultural sector, Inslee points out how smoke from wildfires adversely affects wine quality, a significant industry in Washington.
Call for Political Action:
Inslee emphasizes the importance of the upcoming 2026 congressional elections, advocating for the election of pro-science and pro-renewable energy candidates.
Optimism on Renewable Energy Growth:
Offering a hopeful perspective, Inslee discusses the rapid advancements and decreasing costs in renewable energy technologies, stressing the necessity of supportive policies to sustain this momentum.
Host Closing Remarks: The hosts thank Governor Inslee for his insights and encourage listeners to engage with his initiatives, including potential contributions to their platform. They reinforce the podcast's commitment to highlighting truth and combating misinformation.
Administration's Climate Policies Under Scrutiny: The episode centralizes the critique of the Trump administration's detrimental policies towards renewable energy and climate science, portraying them as regressive steps that ignore scientific consensus and endanger public welfare.
Real-World Impacts of Climate Change: Through Governor Inslee's experiences, the podcast illustrates the severe and escalating consequences of climate change on communities, economies, and ecosystems.
Urgent Call to Action: Emphasizing political engagement, the hosts and Inslee advocate for proactive voter participation to ensure the election of leaders who prioritize scientific integrity and sustainable energy solutions.
Hope in Renewable Energy Advancements: Despite the challenges, there is a strong message of optimism regarding the rapid growth and potential of renewable energy technologies, contingent upon supportive policies and streamlined permitting processes.
Collective Responsibility: The overarching theme underscores the collective responsibility of individuals to advocate for truth, support democratic principles, and take actionable steps towards combating climate change.
Chris Wright (01:48): "This is what we actually know... they're scaring kids in school. We're promoting an alarmist view of climate change that simply contrary to the facts."
Doug Burgum (04:18): "With the phase out of those, I think we're going to see almost zero applications for new projects..."
Sean Duffy (05:21): "We do have some solar, but if you want sustainable life on the moon, you need an energy source."
Jay Inslee (06:03): "They have fully embraced the flat Earth society approach... dealing with the real world."
Jay Inslee (12:28): "We're experiencing a clean energy revolution that is so effective it knocks your socks off."
This episode of The MeidasTouch Podcast offers a compelling critique of current climate and energy policies under the Trump administration, juxtaposed with expert insights from Governor Jay Inslee. The in-depth discussion underscores the urgent need for informed political action and highlights the promising trajectory of renewable energy technologies. Listeners are encouraged to stay engaged, stay informed, and participate actively in shaping a sustainable future.