Former OMB Advisor Michael Linden on Disaster Budget Bill

Summary

Podcast Summary: The MeidasTouch Podcast – "Former OMB Advisor Michael Linden on Disaster Budget Bill"

Podcast Information:

• Title: The MeidasTouch Podcast
• Host/Author: MeidasTouch Network
• Description: Hosted by brothers Ben, Brett, and Jordy Meiselas, the podcast blends comedy, news coverage, and in-depth discussions on supporting democracy. The show attracts millions of listeners and serves as a pivotal platform for interviews with top political leaders. New episodes are released every Tuesday and Friday, with live video sessions on Mondays and Thursdays.

Episode Details:

• Episode Title: Former OMB Advisor Michael Linden on Disaster Budget Bill
• Release Date: June 21, 2025

---

Introduction

In this episode of The MeidasTouch Podcast, the Meiselas brothers engage in a critical discussion with Michael Linden, the former Senior Advisor at the Office of Management and Budget and current Director of Families Over Billionaires. The conversation centers around the recently passed Senate Disaster Budget Bill, its implications, and the broader impact on American society and economy.

---

Overview of the Senate Disaster Budget Bill

Host 1 kicks off the discussion by expressing strong criticism of the Senate's Disaster Budget Bill, highlighting discrepancies between promises made by Republican figures like Donald Trump and MAGA Mike Johnson versus the actual contents of the bill.

Host 1 [01:45]: "Donald Trump and Maga Mike Johnson would say no tax on tips, no tax on Social Security, no tax on overtime time. Well, total bs."

He points out that the bill lacks provisions such as no tax on Social Security and significantly curtails promises like no tax on tips and overtime. Instead, the bill is portrayed as a defrauding measure against the American populace.

---

Impact on Healthcare and Social Programs

The conversation delves into the severe repercussions of the budget bill on essential social programs. Host 1 underscores the threat to healthcare and other assistance programs, which could leave millions without necessary support.

Host 1 [02:30]: "This disastrous budget bill is hurting the economy more broadly. It's a direct attack on healthcare. More than 15 million Americans could be losing their healthcare."

Michael Linden elaborates on these points, emphasizing the massive cuts to healthcare and nutrition assistance, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

Michael Linden [05:53]: "You have massive cuts to nutrition assistance, mainly food stamps, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Three million people are going to lose their food assistance."

He explains that the funds from these cuts are redirected to provide substantial tax cuts to the wealthy, exacerbating economic inequality.

---

Tax Cuts Favoring the Wealthy

A significant portion of the budget bill is dedicated to tax reductions for the affluent, a move that Host 1 and Michael Linden vehemently oppose. The discussion highlights how these tax cuts disproportionately benefit the super-rich while imposing financial burdens on low and middle-income individuals.

Host 1 [08:34]: "The bill literally takes money out of the pockets of low and middle income people and gives it to rich people."

Michael Linden points out the historical context, noting that while previous tax cuts favored the wealthy, this bill marks an unprecedented move where policies explicitly make lives harder for the less affluent to benefit the richest.

Michael Linden [10:37]: "But this is the first time in modern history that the bill will explicitly and directly make people's lives worse so that they can pay for tax cuts for people at the top."

---

Consequences for Middle and Lower-Income Americans

The budget bill not only strips away essential services but also increases the cost of living for everyday Americans. Host 1 articulates the broader economic implications, such as higher costs for healthcare, food, and energy, which disproportionately affect those already struggling to make ends meet.

Host 1 [12:31]: "The bill literally takes money out of the pockets of low and middle income people and gives it to rich people. That is totally backwards from an economic standpoint, from a moral standpoint, from a budgetary standpoint."

Michael Linden echoes these sentiments, stressing that the bill undermines economic stability for the majority while entrenching wealth at the top.

Michael Linden [13:15]: "This bill is so unbelievably unpopular, including among Republicans and independent voters, precisely for that reason."

---

Michael Linden’s Insights and Recommendations

Michael Linden provides a critical analysis of the budget bill, highlighting its flaws and offering solutions to rectify the systemic issues exacerbated by the legislation.

Michael Linden [15:25]: "We could invest in people's education, in their health care. We could reduce the deficit. We could do all of those things."

He advocates for eliminating tax cuts for the wealthy as a straightforward solution to the problems posed by the bill. By reallocating funds from tax breaks for billionaires to essential services, the government can better support working-class Americans.

Michael Linden [17:46]: "If we can all have a conversation, an honest conversation about that, I think it could make a difference in the long run."

Linden emphasizes the importance of public awareness and education to combat the negative effects of the budget bill and push for policies that prioritize everyday people over the ultra-wealthy.

---

The Political Cycle and Public Awareness

Host 1 and Michael Linden discuss the cyclical nature of political blame games and the importance of breaking this cycle through informed public discourse. They express concern that without widespread understanding of the bill's implications, the nation may continue to face divisive politics and economic hardship.

Host 1 [17:00]: "How do we get out of this cycle? That's, I guess my question."

Michael Linden [17:05]: "People are angry. ... This bill just takes a sledgehammer to all of that."

They argue that educating the public about the true impact of the budget bill is crucial for fostering unity and driving meaningful political change.

---

Conclusion

The episode concludes with a call to action, urging listeners to become informed about the budget bill and its ramifications. Host 1 emphasizes the need for grassroots education to empower voters and hold politicians accountable.

Host 1 [17:46]: "I think the key is educating people on what's really happening. Let them understand the process and let them know you're being screwed. You're the mark."

Michael Linden reiterates the potential for collective action to address economic disparities and ensure that government policies serve the broader population rather than a privileged few.

Michael Linden [19:30]: "There is an opportunity here, and maybe this terrible budget bill will be the spark of that opportunity for people to see in each other that common goal of having our government be on our side."

---

Key Takeaways:

• The Senate Disaster Budget Bill poses significant threats to healthcare, nutrition assistance, and housing for millions of Americans.
• The bill's tax cuts disproportionately benefit the wealthy, exacerbating economic inequality.
• There is widespread opposition to the bill, including among Republicans and independent voters.
• Public education and awareness are essential to combat the bill's negative impacts and promote policies that support everyday Americans.
• Collective action and informed discourse can drive meaningful political and economic reforms.

---

Notable Quotes:

• Host 1 [01:45]: "Donald Trump and Maga Mike Johnson would say no tax on tips, no tax on Social Security, no tax on overtime time. Well, total bs."
• Michael Linden [05:53]: "Three million people are going to lose their food assistance."
• Host 1 [12:31]: "The bill literally takes money out of the pockets of low and middle income people and gives it to rich people."
• Michael Linden [15:25]: "If we could just not cut taxes for rich people, you could do all the tax cuts that these people are proposing for middle income people and poor people."

---

Conclusion: This episode of The MeidasTouch Podcast offers a thorough examination of the Senate Disaster Budget Bill, highlighting its adverse effects on the American populace and the economy. Through insightful dialogue with Michael Linden, the podcast underscores the urgency of addressing economic inequality and advocating for policies that prioritize the wellbeing of everyday citizens over the interests of the ultra-wealthy.

Transcript

[Host 1]

Psst.

[Michael Linden]

Your payments are showing, but with Apple Cash, your payments are private by design. There are no public feeds. Send and receive money privately in messages or with Tap to Cash. Switch to Apple Cash. Apple Cash services are provided by Green bank member FDIC.

[LifeLock Ad Voice]

This episode is brought to you by LifeLock. Between two factor authentication, strong passwords and a VPN, you try to be in control of how your info is protected. But many other places also have it and they might not be as careful. That's why Lifelock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats. If your identity is stolen, they'll fix it, guaranteed or your money back. Save up to 40% your first year. Visit lifelock.com podcast for 40% off. Terms apply.

[Mantis X Ad Voice]

Want to sharpen your aim, save money on ammo and train like the pros, all from the comfort of your home. Meet Mantis X, the cutting edge dry fire training system used by the Marine Corps, army and Special Forces to build precision and confidence. 94% of shooters report improved accuracy in just 20 minutes and you could be next. With Mantis X, you train with your own firearm anytime, anywhere without wasting a single round in less than two weeks. The system pays for itself and ammo savings alone. As a proud gun owner, I believe in the second Amendment. But rights come with responsibility. That means refining your accuracy, mastering your skills and staying prepared every time you train. Whether you're a new shooter or an experienced marksman, Mantis X helps you train smarter, shoot better, and defend what matters most. Get yours [e-mail] that's mantisx.com remember when.

[Host 1]

Donald Trump and Maga Mike Johnson would say no tax on tips, no tax on Social Security, no tax on overtime time. Well, total bs. Now that the disastrous budget bill, and we know how bad it is, has made its way through the Senate Finance Committee. Well, let's just say it looks very, very different whether they're directly screwing MAGA Mike Johnson or this was all part of the fraud to begin with. Well, there's nothing at all in this new version, at least in the Senate, about no tax on Social Security. Remember, no tax on tips and no, no tax on overtime. While those are so extremely curtailed with all of these exceptions as they're not really anything that Donald Trump or MAGA Mike ever said was going to exist. So just more defrauding of the American people. I also wanna talk just how this disastrous budget bill is hurting the economy more broadly. But of course, as you know, it's a direct attack on healthcare. The more than 15 million Americans could be losing their healthcare. It's an attack on Medicaid, on snap, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, on housing. Just, just even watch how Fox is describing the changes from the Senate Finance Committee to what MAGA Mike and the MAGA Republicans in the House claim existed here. Play this clip.

[Rand Paul Ad Voice]

The House's massive tax and spending bill fresh off the printer. That was Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, Republican, telling FOX BUSINESS this morning the President's big beautiful bill will barely scratch the surface when it comes to shrinking the annual deficit because the slices in spending are minuscule compared to the huge mountain of debt the country owes as he sees it. Not only does the Senate want to raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, the other key changes in this version versus the House include Medicaid cuts from 6% to 3 1/2% by 2031. The SALT deduction cap has been extended back down to $10,000 versus the House's proposal which raises it to 40,000 DOL, a two year phase out of clean energy credits versus the House repealing tax credit projects that don't begin within 60 days. And raising the child tax credit to $2,200 through the 2028 tax year versus the House raising it to a maximum of $2,500. The GOP senators joining Rand Paul in his disdain of the bill include Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson and Missouri Senator Josh Hawley, although for different reasons.

[Host 1]

You know who also seems to have gotten utterly screwed by the Senate? Those New York Congress members like Mike Lawler who said that the salt cap would have to be raised to $40,000. And now under the Senate version it's back down to 10. And now they're basically saying what are you going to do, Lawlor? You're going to vote against, you're going to vote against it. I mean, they just keep exposing that guy all the time. And you want to hear how they're basically framing the of whether or not you're going to lose your Medicaid or not. Basically. I just remember back in the days where they would talk about like the Republicans with like death panels and they would say that these panels would decide who lives and who dies. They're basically doing versions of that, except now It's a reality TV version. You have Dr. Oz and he basically says that you need to demonstrate to me you want to help this country. And if I think you're not helping the country, you lose your Medicaid. Here, listen to him in his own words. Here, play the clip. Demonstrate that you are trying your hardest to help this country be greater by at least trying to fill some of the jobs that we have open. And by doing that, you earn the right to be on Medicaid. You earn the right to live or I decide if you die. I mean, that's. Let's bring in Michael Linden. Michael, formerly at the Office of Management and Budget, senior advisor, you now are the director of an organization, Families Over Billionaires. This bill, disastrous as it is in the House, seems even more disastrous now that the Senate Finance Committee has put out its high level points. What do you make of it all?

[Michael Linden]

Yeah, that's exactly right. I mean, we should step back here for a minute and just remind ourselves what we're talking about here. So the House bill was very bad. The Senate bill would be even worse. But at the core of this bill is a couple of really important things for people to understand. First of all, massive cuts to healthcare. You heard Dr. Oz talk about, he calls it healthcare reform. That's interesting way to describe kicking 16 million people off of their health insurance. And that's what these plans would do. You have massive cuts to nutrition assistance, mainly food stamps, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Three million people are going to lose their food assistance. We're not talking about generous benefits as it is. These are people who make do with basically $6 a day in food assistance. And then what happens to that money? That's about a trillion dollars in cuts over the next 10 years. What happens to that money? Well, it goes to partially pay for giant tax cuts, most of which go to people at the very, very top. That's the basic math of this bill. People lose health care, pay more for health care, lose food assistance, pay more for food, pay more for energy, all so that people at the very top can get another tax cut. The Senate bill does not fix any of those things. It makes it worse. Their cuts to Medicaid are deeper and more painful than the House version. Their tax cuts for rich people are bigger and more ridiculous frankly, than the House version. So if anybody was hoping that the Senate would moderate the incredibly extreme House version, they were really mistaken. They were really mistaken.

[Host 1]

You know, Michael, I remember they used to MAGA Republicans in the early, before they were MAGA and they were whatever they were Tea Party or before they were trickle down, they at least tried to pitch it of like if you help the billionaires and basically give welfare for the billionaires, they're going to be so gracious with their purchases of G6 jets and yachts and mansions that eventually you'll get, you know, a little bit Trickled down on you. They're not even necessarily even going with that hook anymore. They kind of leave it with, you're going to help the billionaires and you're gonna like it and shut the F up. Just shut the hell up and just be quiet. They deserve it. You don't like that's kind of where we're at now.

[Michael Linden]

Yeah, it is kind of. I mean, they know. They actually know that the American people don't buy trickle down at all. They've tried it. They tried that argument. They've tried it so many times. They tried it under George W. Bush, they tried it under Trump the first time, and it never works. It never works economically. That's really important. And most Americans understand that in their bones that when you give a tax break to people at the top, it does not cascade down to everybody else. It just makes the rich richer at everybody else's expense. And this time you're so right. The policy hasn't changed. They are still bestowing huge tax cuts on the largest corporations in America, the richest people on the planet. But they're not even arguing that that's going to do any good. Right? Because they know that argument doesn't work. So they're just trying to pretend that that's not happening and instead say, we have so much waste and fraud or abuse in these programs, it's amazing. They don't even argue that these people need these tax cuts anymore because they know that is an argument that completely falls on deaf ears. So instead of, they're just trying to distract and say, no, no, no, we're not cutting taxes for them, we're cutting taxes for you. But as you pointed out at the very front, all the tax cuts that they say are for middle income people or working people are either absent from the bill or dramatically pared back from what was promised. Can you imagine if Donald Trump had ran on no tax on tips, but only for a few years and only a certain amount of tips and only in a particular set of industries? Like that's not a particularly compelling slogan, but that's what the policy is. And on the other hand, the tax cuts for the super wealthy are incredibly generous. And you know, nobody has to jump through hoops to get their billionaire tax break. But if you're a working person, you've got to prove that you deserve it. In the words of Dr. Oz.

[Host 1]

And then the very just nature of tips versus creating an overall economic system where Americans could be able to afford their homes if they worked a job without having to worry about will I get to. How about if your company and your boss provides you with the wages at a crazy radical concept. I must be a crazy leftist here that you get paid wages for working a job that allows you to live a life of dignity in the wealthiest country in the world. And here's the thing, and I don't think this is a radical concept and push back on me if you think I'm wrong here. You know how the way you deal with this all you tax rich people a little bit more or first you start off with making sure rich people are taxed fairly and they're not dodging their taxes and they pay their accurate taxes that they owed. And then you know what you say, well, under this budget bill, someone who makes over $4.2 million gets an extra $400,000 bonus while someone making under 50,000 loses $1,000. Maybe if we just looked at that and go, you know what the people making over $4.2 million, you know that $400,000, is that going to be life or death for that person? Or will taking the $1,000 away for the person making under $50,000, by the way, not only impact and systemic problems that are also going to hurt the person making more than $4.2 million and how it's going to impact our society holistically, that you end up going to be paying for it anyway. It's actually, and I hope I'm not oversimplifying it and making it sounds like an easy solve if you want to fix this. I don't like having debt, I don't like having deficit. You know how you address it? Tax rich people a little bit more and fairly.

[Michael Linden]

You're not wrong. And it's actually that simple. I think there's two important points that people need to really understand here. First of all, exactly as you described, the bill is exactly right. The bill literally takes money out of the pockets of low and middle income people and gives it to rich people. That is totally backwards from an economic standpoint, from a moral standpoint, from a budgetary standpoint. And it's also unprecedented. It's actually not something that this country typically does. There's been a bunch of analyses out recently that looked at this tax and budget bill compared to previous tax and budget bills. And yes, there have been bills in the past like the Bush tax cuts or the Trump tax cuts from 2017 that disproportionately benefited the wealthy. Compared to what the benefits were for poor people or middle income people, rich people got a bigger benefit. But this is the first time in modern history that the bill will explicitly and directly make people's lives worse so that they can pay for tax cuts for people at the top. That is. That is so crazy that it's kind of sound when you tell people that they think that can't really be what it's doing. Like, why would anybody do that? But that is exactly what this is doing. And you are exactly right. This is an easy fix. We just need to not cut taxes for rich people. If we just didn't cut taxes for rich people in this bill, you could do all the tax cuts that these people are proposing for middle income people and poor people, and there aren't that many of them or more, and you can still get rid of the cuts to health care and assist and food assistance, and you'd have the same overall cost. And if you asked rich people to just pay a little bit more of their fair share to give back just a portion of the tax cuts that they've received over the last 25 years, we could do a whole lot more. We could invest in people's education, in their health care. We could reduce the deficit. We could do all of those things. In this country, there are billionaires who pay a lower tax rate, a lower share of their income in taxes than a teacher or a firefighter or, you know, a garbage worker or a factory worker. That is absolutely indefensible. And this bill will make that worse. And by the way, that is not something that is particularly partisan. Most Republican voters do not want to cut taxes for rich people or cut Medicaid. Most Republican voters think it's completely ridiculous that the rich are paying lower tax rates in many cases than the middle class. So the fix is easy if you had politicians in Washington who were not looking out only for the interests of the super wealthy and giant corporations.

[Host 1]

Here's the thing, I think, though, right, this process is complicated. The budget process. It's not like a simple concept. I mean, already it's pretty confusing. It's like, wait a minute, I thought they passed the budget four months ago. No, that was just the outline. And then they did this. And then what? What was that? Then they voted on cloture. What the hell is cloture? And there's this committee and then there's a rules markup, and then, and then the House voted. And then some people are like, wait, isn't that a law? No, that's just the House. Now you're bringing it back to the Senate. But wasn't there already a reconciliation? No, that was just a reconciliation on the outline. And now the Senate's looking at what they passed with the rules committee marked up. And so I think that by the time you get through the process, and this is what I think the Republicans are hoping, that people don't really know what the hell is going on. You layer on top of that 30 other distractions that are now taking place and very serious ones, and before you know it, you have this disastrous budget that, that goes into effect. People start losing their health care and then what they have to do or they start, you know, getting impacted, then they just got to play the blame game, divide us as Americans along cultural lines, start really injecting back, oh, transgender this. And you're angry at this. Split us up. And then, and then rinse, repeat Democrat comes in, fix it, blame the firefighter for putting out the arson. The arsonist come back in, relight the fire. How do we get out of this cycle, Michael? That's, I guess my.

[Michael Linden]

That's your question? That's your simple question. How do I fix American politics?

[Host 1]

Well, here's what, here's how I think we do it. And it's a very self serving answer. And, but I'll give you the final word though. I think to create. No one's having the conversations that you and I are having here on corporate news on a date. Like no one's getting into the guts of this thing and explaining it. And frankly, I believe I'm explaining it from a nonpartisan basis because I don't think that red state voters should be screwed by this. I don't think blue state vote, but I think the key is educating people on what's really happening. Let them understand the process and let them know you're being screwed. You're, you're the mark. And probably if you're a red state voter, you're getting hurt. Even you're probably getting way more hurt than I am. That's the reality.

[Michael Linden]

Yeah, I mean, I think you're right. I think, look, we have a long list of problems in this country and the economy that does not work for most people is under, underneath a lot of it, not all of it, but a big chunk of it. And I think your, your intuition is right that regardless of where you live or who you voted for, you probably do not think it is a good idea to take people's health care away in order to pay for tax cuts for rich people like that. This bill is so unbelievably unpopular, including among Republicans and independent voters, precisely for that reason. Yes. People are angry. A lot of things. We have a lot going on in the world. There's lots of bad things in the world. I don't want to pretend that there's not. But I also think there is actually a pretty, pretty broad general consensus that the federal government should be on the side of working people, of people who are struggling to get by, of people who are doing their best and playing by the rules, and not on the side of corporations who ship jobs overseas, or billionaires who just happen to be the biggest campaign donors. And there is an opportunity here, and maybe this terrible budget bill will be the spark of that opportunity for people to see in each other that common goal of having our government be on our side and not on the side of some billionaire who just can pay the most to whatever the latest Mar A Lago dinner is. I do hope that the stakes of this fight are so real that so many people will be hurt. People will lose their insurance. People will pay more for their insurance. People will not have food on the table. I hope that the stakes of this fight will focus us all together on what we share. We share a desire for an economy that actually delivers for everyday people and a government that can stand on the side of everyday people. That's not what's happening here. Despite what the rhetoric was of the Republicans who got elected. They ran on working, you know, working for working people. That's what they ran on. Lowering costs and giving people a little breathing room. And the first thing they do is turn around and cut health care to pay for tax cuts for billionaires. I think if we can all have a conversation, an honest conversation about that, I think it could make a difference in the long run. This is a big, long process. And you're right, they're going to turn around and try to point the blame wherever they can and, you know, change the subject. But people's healthcare is their number one subject. Is everybody's number one subject. Their health, their family, their bottom lines. And this bill just. It takes a sledgehammer to all of that.

[Host 1]

But, hey, we've got gigantic flag polls going up in the White House. Huge, massive flag polls that are being there. Hey, Michael Linden, thank you so much for joining us. Michael, as I mentioned at the outset, was a senior advisor at the Office of Management and Budget. He's now the director of an organization called Families Over Billionaires. Thanks, Michael. Thank you, everybody. Hit subscribe. The truth is more important than ever. Check out our new Truth over lies [e-mail] touch.com All 100% USA Union made.

[SoFi Ad Voice]

High interest debt is one of the toughest opponents you'll face unless you power up with a SOFI personal loan. A SOFI personal loan could repackage your bad debt into one low fixed rate monthly payment. It's even got super speed since you could get the funds as soon as the same day you sign. Visit sofi.compower to learn more. That's s o f I.com powder we are loans originated by Sofa Bank, NA member FDIC terms and conditions apply. MMLS 696891.