The MeidasTouch Podcast: "SECRET Trump PAC that FAKED RBG Endorsement REVEALED"
Episode Release Date: December 7, 2024
Hosts: Ben, Brett, and Jordy Meiselas
Podcast Description: Combining brotherly banter with incisive political analysis, the Meiselas brothers delve into current events with humor and a steadfast commitment to supporting democracy. This episode tackles a controversial political maneuver involving a super PAC allegedly connected to Elon Musk and the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
1. Introduction to the Controversial RBG PAC
Timestamp: 01:07
In this episode, the Meiselas brothers dissect the formation and activities of a super PAC named the RBG PAC (Ruth Bader Ginsburg PAC), which emerged just weeks before the November presidential election.
Key Points:
- Formation and Purpose: Established on October 16th, the RBG PAC leveraged the esteemed legacy of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a staunch advocate for women's rights and reproductive freedoms.
- Financial Influx: The PAC rapidly acquired $20 million, channeling funds to support then-President Donald Trump—ironically, a figure who had recently overturned Roe v. Wade and dismantled much of Ginsburg's legacy.
Notable Quote:
"On October 16th, before the November presidential election, a super PAC called the RBG PAC or the Ruth Bader Ginsburg PAC was formed."
— Political Analyst (01:07)
2. Unveiling Elon Musk's Involvement
Timestamp: 03:42
A pivotal revelation in the episode is the identification of Elon Musk as the principal financier behind the deceptive RBG PAC.
Key Points:
- FEC Disclosure: The Federal Election Commission's Schedule A FEC Form 3X disclosed that the Elon Musk Revocable Trust was the sole funder of the PAC.
- Deceptive Advertising: The PAC disseminated ads falsely portraying Justice Ginsburg as endorsing Trump, despite her family's staunch opposition to such misuse of her legacy.
- Family's Condemnation: Ruth Bader Ginsburg's family publicly denounced the PAC, emphasizing that her family had no association with the group and condemning the unauthorized use of her name and image.
Notable Quotes:
"It was Elon Musk who did it. The Elon Musk Revocable Trust... injected $20 million into these very deceptive ads."
— Political Analyst (02:45)
"The use of her name and image to support Donald Trump's reelection campaign and specifically to suggest that she would approve of his position on abortion is nothing short of appalling."
— Ms. Sparrow, Ginsburg Family Representative (05:20)
3. Impact of Misusing RBG's Legacy
Timestamp: 03:42 - 06:27
The episode delves into the broader implications of misappropriating a revered figure's legacy for political gain.
Key Points:
- Message Manipulation: The RBG PAC ran numerous ads insinuating that Justice Ginsburg supported Trump's stance on abortion, which starkly contradicts her documented beliefs.
- Family's Stand: Justice Ginsburg's family highlighted her disapproval of Trump, citing her 2016 interview where she expressed horror at the notion of him presiding over the Supreme Court.
- Public Deception: The PAC's strategy aimed to sway voters by linking Trump's policies with those of a respected jurist, thereby misleading the public.
Notable Quote:
"RBG believed that the federal government shouldn't dictate our abortion laws. This is again written by Musk's PAC."
— Political Analyst (04:11)
4. Broader Implications of Campaign Finance Laws
Timestamp: 08:10
The discussion transitions to the systemic issues within campaign finance laws that enable such manipulative practices.
Key Points:
- Citizens United Ruling: The Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. FEC paved the way for unlimited spending by corporations and wealthy individuals in political campaigns, under the guise of First Amendment rights.
- Influence of Billionaires: Figures like Elon Musk, Timothy Mellon, and Miriam Adelson have funneled substantial funds into super PACs, overshadowing the influence of average citizens in the electoral process.
- Lack of Regulation: The erosion of campaign finance regulations has led to unchecked spending, allowing for deceptive and manipulative political advertisements.
Notable Quotes:
"Campaign finance laws used to ban all of this stuff, right? But then the Federalist Society in the case Citizens United claimed that corporations have a First Amendment right..."
— Political Analyst (08:10)
"Someone like Elon Musk, who's worth hundreds of billions... this is like nothing to him."
— Political Analyst (08:50)
5. Consequences of Manipulative Political Funding
Timestamp: 08:10 - 12:13
The episode highlights the ramifications of such funding practices on democratic processes and election integrity.
Key Points:
- Election Manipulation: Large financial contributions from super PACs can distort electoral outcomes by amplifying specific narratives that may not align with candidates' true stances.
- Erosion of Trust: Deceptive practices, like falsely attributing endorsements to respected figures, undermine public trust in both the political system and the individuals involved.
- Call for Accountability: The hosts emphasize the need for transparency and stricter campaign finance regulations to prevent future abuses.
Notable Quote:
"This type of conduct became rampant and all of the guardrails that were in place were removed."
— Political Analyst (09:30)
"Manipulating elections like that seems to be incredibly egregious... but it's just important that we call it out."
— Host 2 (11:55)
6. Conclusion and Reflections
Timestamp: 12:30
Wrapping up the episode, the hosts reiterate the critical importance of safeguarding democratic processes against undue financial influence.
Key Points:
- Awareness and Vigilance: Listeners are encouraged to remain vigilant and informed about the sources and intents behind political advertisements and endorsements.
- Advocacy for Reform: There's a collective call to advocate for reforms in campaign finance to restore balance and fairness in elections.
- Community Responsibility: The Meiselas brothers highlight the role of informed citizens in holding powerful figures accountable, ensuring that democracy remains resilient against manipulative tactics.
Notable Quote:
"It's worth noting as well that Donald Trump received $614 million through various political action committees of people like Elon Musk, Timothy Mellon, Miriam Adelson."
— Political Analyst (08:10)
"It's just important that we call it out that you know what went down."
— Political Analyst (11:45)
Final Thoughts:
In "SECRET Trump PAC that FAKED RBG Endorsement REVEALED," the MeidasTouch Podcast exposes the intricate and deceptive strategies employed by powerful individuals like Elon Musk to manipulate political narratives and elections. By unraveling the false endorsement of Donald Trump through the misuse of Ruth Bader Ginsburg's legacy, the episode underscores the urgent need for transparency and reform in campaign finance laws. The Meiselas brothers blend insightful analysis with engaging discourse, empowering listeners to recognize and combat such undermining tactics in the democratic process.
Connect with The MeidasTouch Podcast:
- New Episodes: Released every Tuesday and Friday morning
- Live Videos: Mondays and Thursdays at 8 PM ET/5 PM PT on the MeidasTouch YouTube channel
- Follow on Social Media: Join the MeidasMighty, the loyal fanbase supporting democracy and engaging in deep political discussions.