Loading summary
Transcript41 lines
- [00:00]
Joe from Vanta
Hi, this is Joe from Vanta. In today's digital world, compliance regulations are changing constantly and earning customer trust has never mattered more. Vanta helps companies get compliant fast and stay secure with the most advanced AI, automation and continuous monitoring out there. So whether you're a startup going for your first SoC2 or ISO 27001 or a growing enterprise managing vendor risk, Vanta makes it quick, easy and scalable. And I'm not just saying that because I work here. Get started@vanta.com.
- [00:31]
Windows Copilot Narrator
Meet the computer you can talk to with Copilot on Windows Working, creating and collaborating is as easy as talking. Got writer's block? Share your screen with Copilot Vision to help spark inspiration and use Copilot voice to have a conversation and brainstorm ideas. Or maybe you need some tech help with Copilot Vision. Copilot sees what you see. Let Copilot talk you through step by step guidance so you can master new apps, games and skills faster. Try now@windows.com copilot this is a real.
- [01:00]
Shopify Narrator
Good story about Bronx and his dad Ryan. Real United Airlines customers.
- [01:04]
Midas Touch Network Host
We were returning home and one of the flight attendants asked Bronx if he wanted to see the flight deck and meet Kathy and Andrew. I got to sit in the driver's seat. I grew up in an aviation family and seeing Bronx kind of reminded me.
- [01:16]
Midas Touch Network Co-host
Of myself when I was that age.
- [01:17]
Shopify Narrator
That's Andrew, a real United pilot.
- [01:19]
Midas Touch Network Host
These small interactions can shape a kid's future. It felt like I was the captain. Allowing my son to see the flight deck will stick with us forever.
- [01:27]
Midas Touch Network Co-host
That's how good leads the way.
- [01:29]
Shopify Narrator
Shopify helps you sell at every stage of your business. Like that. Let's put it online and see what happens.
- [01:34]
Midas Touch Network Co-host
Stage and the site is live.
- [01:36]
Shopify Narrator
That reopened a store and need a fast checkout. Stage thanks. You're all set that count it up and ship it around the globe.
- [01:43]
Midas Touch Network Host
Stage this one's going to Thailand and.
- [01:46]
Shopify Narrator
That Wait, did we just hit a million orders? Stage Whatever your Stage Businesses that grow grow with Shopify. Sign up for your $1 a month trial@shopify.com.
- [01:59]
Midas Touch Network Co-host
Wow.
- [02:00]
Midas Touch Network Host
The Trump regime is systematically deleting destroying evidence that has already been produced in that already sham document production that was done on Friday. And it's more than just file 468 which we previously covered here on the Midas Touch network. And just to remind you, File 468 was a photograph that looks like it.
- [02:24]
Midas Touch Network Analyst
Was on a a desk of Epstein.
- [02:28]
Midas Touch Network Host
And when you zoomed in you could actually see a photo of Donald Trump.
- [02:31]
Midas Touch Network Analyst
With looks like young women, unclear their age, possibly a photo of Donald Trump.
- [02:37]
Midas Touch Network Host
Melania Epstein and Ghislaine that seemed to have been turned over by accident by the DOJ that's been involved in this massive cover up of anything having to do with Trump in these files. But we know File 468 was immediately removed from the production. So when you went back and looked at the DOJ website, It went like, file 466-467469. But it's not just 4 6, 8, like, it's others as well. The AP did an analysis. At least 16 files have disappeared from the DOJ webpage for documents relating to Epstein. Sixteen files have been deleted. Now, the law, the Epstein Transparency act, requires that all documents be turned over within 30 days, which is December 19, subject to redactions just of the victim's name. Now, one of the things we're learning is that the Trump DOJ is now claiming that the victims are actually the men who were the perpetrators, the men who were involved in the sex trafficking room. The Trump regime is saying they're actually the victims, while also saying that the actual victims, the underage girls, their name, some of their names have been disclosed. Like Aaron Parnas at the Midas Touch Network broke this story right here, that a Jane Doe survivor whose name should have been redacted based on a report that she made about Epstein to the FBI in 2009, her name was actually released in the document dump. That was done on Friday. And she sent a letter to the DOJ saying, look, I'm a survivor of Epstein. I write to place the Department of Justice on formal notice of the grave and indefensible violation arising from the December 19 release of records under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. In that release, my name and identifying information was disclosed publicly without proper redaction. So this Jane Doe, who's actually a victim, who, who's a survivor of Epstein, her name was leaked through the sloppiness and maliciousness or you may say, intentional aspects of what this Trump DOJ is doing. But they've covered up all of the. Other than just doing photos of Bill Clinton in contexts that are misleading. Like they did a picture of Clinton, Diana Ross, Diana Ross's kids, or they did a photo of, like, Michael Jackson and Diana Ross's kid. They did like photos like this. And they were like, ah, look what we've got right here. Other than that Trump is claiming that, you know, all these men, and probably including himself, right, that were with Epstein, that they're the real victims and their names need to be redacted. Let's just take a look at what the Associated Press is saying, though, about the 16 files that have disappeared. At least 16 files disappeared from the Justice Department's public webpage for documents relating to Jeffrey Epstein, including a photograph showing Donald Trump. Trump, less than a day after they were posted on the DOJ website with no explanation from the government and no notice to the public. The missing files, which were available on Friday and no longer accessible by Saturday, include images of paintings depicting nude women and one showing a series of photographs along a credenza and in drawers. In that image, inside a drawer, among other photos, was a photograph of Trump alongside Epstein, Melania, and Epstein's longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell. There actually looks like there's another photo there. As you zoom in, it appears to.
- [06:28]
Midas Touch Network Analyst
Be Trump, but, you know, but that's.
- [06:30]
Midas Touch Network Host
At least two photos, maybe one photo there. The Justice Department did not say why the files were removed or whether their disappearance was intentional. A spokesperson for the department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Look, I appreciate that the Associated Press wants to do a diligent job here, but come on, Associated Press. We know the reason. It's because it was intentional. And it's because Donald Trump's on it. And they're covering up everything related to Donald Trump and relating to all of the people, the, the, the rich and wealthy men that Donald Trump wants to cover up as this Trump regime is involved in a ppp, a pedo protection program, or covering up this child sex trafficking ring. You have Marjorie Taylor Greene saying, my goodness, what is in the Epstein files? Release all the files now.
- [07:17]
Midas Touch Network Analyst
Yeah.
- [07:17]
Midas Touch Network Host
So then you've got this.
- [07:18]
Midas Touch Network Analyst
And we uncover that the Trump DOJ was redacting Donald Trump's name from documents that seem to have been inadvertently produced that had Donald Trump's name on it from the files that were turned over. If you look on Saturday, it has these redactions that were not there on Friday. I'm just going to warn you right here, what I'm going to say is a little bit graphic. And again, I want to be very clear, like, this appears to be allegations that were being denied at the time. Again, these are just allegations that were being made at the time. It said Blank liked flicking and sucking nipples until they were raw. One evening when we were showering together, she showed me it. They looked incredibly painful and they were red and swollen. I also known she had sexual relations with redacted at Jeffrey's New York mansion on regular occasions. And I once met Blank for Coffee just before she was going to meet Blank and Epstein together at his mansion. Now, in what was produced on Friday, this document with the redactions where it had Trump's name on Donald Trump, like doing that, I know she had relations with Trump is what it said. And again, just to be, let me be very, very clear and explicit, I don't, you know, these are allegations that I believe were denied at the time. The only thing I'm simply trying to point out here is that they put documents forward and Trump's name was actually on it. And they seem to have inadvertently put Trump's name out there like that. Then they went back on Saturday and put a redaction over it. And that's the only point I'm trying to make there. So let me just explain to you just everything that happened.
- [08:58]
Midas Touch Network Host
In general, I don't want you to be confused here, right? Just on Friday, Trump's DOJ produced about 2% of what is in, say it's 5%, 5% of what is in the so called, what's been referred to as the Epstein files, which is terabytes and terabytes of information, data, FBI witness statements, photographs, all of this. So about the DOJ, Trump was required to produce 100%. Just redact the victim's names on Friday. They violated the law because they're implicated, they're involved, they're covering up at this point, based on their conduct, they are. Right, covering up this child sex trafficking, trafficking ring, in my opinion. Right, that seems obvious. They say that, oh, well, this is just the first phase. This is an initial deadline. No, it's the deadline. Then from what they produced, right? They redacted. 90% of the 2% was redacted, meaning you couldn't even read anything or make anything out because there were black lines that go through it and you can't even. Or black lines covering up the photos. And then from what was released, they've just deleted 16 of the files and they didn't give any explanation. I mean, again, this is a crime. It violates the Epstein Transparency Act, Subsection B prohibits this as well. You can't withhold, delay, redact on the basis of embarrassment or reputational harm. And then one of the things we've learned from Fox, Fox of all places, right? Fox's state regime, media, the same redaction standards for the actual victims were applied to, quote, politically exposed individuals and government officials. The perpetrators, the rich men, right? The wealthy men and powerful men who were working with Epstein, who were involved with Epstein, who are in these they're being treated as the victims. But it goes further than this as well. Jason Leopold, who's been really one of the best reporters on this, he writes for Bloomberg. He explains that Todd Blanche just sent a letter to Congress. And in his letter to Congress, Todd Blanche says that documents were withheld under something called a deliberative process privilege and attorney client privilege and attorney work product privilege. He explains that in a FOIA request, Freedom of Information act request, that's equivalent to a B5 exemption. Using the FOIA as a guide, Freedom of Information act, it means expect vast swaths of docs to continue to be redacted and withheld, which is pretty much the bulk of documents about the government's investigation everyone wants to see. Blanche says although the Epstein Files Transparency act broadly categorizes items required to be produced, the act does not include language expressly requiring the department to produce privileged materials. So even though the Epstein Transparency act says produce everything other than the names of the actual victims, the Trump regime is saying, well, you didn't say that we're not allowed to assert attorney client privilege, attorney work product privilege, and deliberative process privilege. So what does that mean? Well, think about deliberative process is like when the FBI is gathering witness statements. It's a deliberative process. Their investigation, their investigatory notes, all of that is a deliberative process, their investigation. Right. What did the witnesses say? What does the surveillance footage say or show? What do the wiretaps show? Deliberate. A deliberative process. It really refers to, like, the investigation that the DOJ did into Epstein in 2007. And then when Epstein and Ghislaine were arrested and charged again. So then they say work product privilege. Work product privilege is also the internal notes, internal memos. And then they claim attorney client privilege, which they're basically saying, well, at this point, they're saying that they're their own client. So they're going to withhold basically everything by claiming that basically the DOJ is its own client. So they're not going to produce records. It's the same the attorney work product and attorney client privilege that's being asserted by Kristi Noem and by Todd Blanche and by others in the the contempt cases right now based on their violation of court orders where they sent the migrants to El Salvador. And the judge said, give me a declaration and tell me what you did. Right. And despite the fact that they go on Fox and they spread all of these lies and they put out all this propaganda, they go, attorney client privilege, attorney work product. We can't tell you anything at all. Hey everybody, Ben Meiselis here from the Midas Touch Network. I wanted to let you know about my podcast partner Michael Popak's new law firm. It's called the Popoc Firm. Michael Popo's pursuing his dream of starting his own law firm, really based on the popular demand by all the Midas mighty and legal A effers who are approaching Michael Popak with their cases and saying, can you help us? And at that time, Popak was not able to. So he went out on his own. He started the Popoc Firm where he is now handling catastrophic injury cases like car accident cases, trucking cases, malpractice cases, big negligence cases, wrongful death cases. So if you or someone you know have a case like this, the consultation with Popo's firm is free. Give him a call. See if you have a case. It's ThePopoc Firm.com ThePopoc Firm.com or you can call 877-popock-af-p o p o k a f. So 1-877-p-o p o k a f give Michael Popak a call and I'm really proud of you, Popak. Thanks for all the hard work you're putting in. Just take a look at what this letter that Todd Blanche sent. This was just sent to Congress. Hat tip to Leopold for pointing it out. In addition to the bases for withholding or redacting under the act, the Department has withheld and redacted a limited amount of information otherwise covered by various privileges, including the deliberative process privilege, work product privilege and attorney client privilege. These privileges are based in common law, not statutes, and Congress is fully aware of them. It is a long held principle that Congress speaks clearly when it intends to abrogate a common law principle or privilege. Although the act broadly categorizes items to be protected, the act does not include language expressly requiring the Department to produce privileged material. And so here the DOJ saying, well, Congress, even though you said everything, you didn't say that we couldn't assert these privileges and withhold the documents. So again, to be very clear, the doj Trump are claiming that the perpetrators, the bad guys, are the victims. So they're not going to produce anything relating to them. They're not going to produce anything they deem to be deliberative process, which means all of the investigation, wiretaps, internal notes, all of the, you know, everything, work product kind of meaning a lot of the same thing. And attorney client privilege they're going to assert. So I just want to read it to you so you understand what's going on there. Now you got to go back and. Do you remember when the DOJ Deputy Chief, Joseph Schnit, um, where. Where the guy, James o', Keefe, went undercover and he did like one of these undercover investigations where I think it was someone who claimed that they were like, be going on a date with, with the guy, whatever. I forget what it was, but they got the DOJ Deputy chief who admitted this was many, many, many months ago what was going to happen here. Let's just play this clip so you can hear it for yourself.
- [17:10]
Joseph Schnit
Those files do exist. Yeah. Thousands and thousands of age group files. They'll redact every Republican or conservative person in those files, leave all the liberal Democratic people in the.
- [17:23]
CNN Compilation Narrator
Those box.
- [17:24]
Joseph Schnit
I think they visited that Maxwell person. Yeah. And also got transferred to a minimum security prison too, recently, which is against BOP policy because she's. She's a convicted sex or something. Keep it out.
- [17:40]
CNN Compilation Narrator
That was the Acting Deputy Chief of the Office of Enforcement Operations, Joseph Schnit, telling a stranger about the FBI and the DOJ's handling of the Epstein files. Schnit, who works at a high level inside the Department of Justice, goes on to comment on the inconsistent statements, special treatment of Ghislaine Maxwell, and the blatant backtracking on promises of transparency.
- [18:05]
Joseph Schnit
What do you.
- [18:05]
Midas Touch Network Co-host
What do you do for work?
- [18:06]
Joseph Schnit
I work for the Department of justice. Okay. Like 23 years. I'm an analyst. I'll be acting Deputy chief of our office for a few months starting next week. I work closely with like, all the federal law enforcement agencies, the U.S. attorney's offices, the prosecutors and stuff. The thing is, it's what you're saying because I do deal with so many of the agencies like the Bureau of Prisons, The Marshal Service, FBI, U.S. attorney's office.
- [18:34]
Midas Touch Network Host
Now, here is MAGA Mike Johnson, and this is what MAGA Mike Johnson said during the government shutdown when he was trying to block the discharge petition that was being circulated at that time. Right. That's when it was being circulated. And MAGA Mike says the problem with the law, remember I warned you and I said, this is what. This is where they're going to go. Even when the law gets passed, MAGA Mike says it will create new victims, referring to the powerful men as the victims. Here, play this clip.
- [19:06]
Midas Touch Network Co-host
Do. The discharge petition could create new victims. Okay? Because it requires the DOJ to release information. Even in cases where the DOJ or the FBI has already reviewed it and determined it is not credible, it is false. Information doing this and requiring this to come out could ruin the reputations of completely innocent people such as those who have made may just have known Epstein but knew nothing of his crimes or whose names he exploited. Think of this. Innocent people whose names he exploited and used to try to get close to his intended victims. Their names may be in these files and they had nothing to do with this. And so by just haphazardly releasing it, you're going to destroy their reputations. Releasing information containing the names of innocent people would subject those innocent people to a guilt by association. It would create an entirely new group of victims who have no means to clear their names. That's a concern of Congress and it should be. It should be.
- [20:04]
Midas Touch Network Host
Now here is the. Here was a PowerPoint presentation that MAGA Mike made at the time. Look at it over here. It says, dangers of the discharge petition if not amended victim privacy does not adequately protect victims. Innocent persons risks disclosure of non credible allegations creating new victims. That's referring to the powerful men. That's how sick these Republicans are. That's why I want to read it to you. So I come with the receipts, right? Uh, CSAM fails to adequately protect against the release of child sexual abuse materials, future investigations, provides no protections for whistleblowers or undercover law enforcement. Declassification requires the release of information that could reveal confidential methods and sources. So ultimately, what MAGA Mike, Donald Trump and the DOJ agreed to is, look, let's pretend that we support this Epstein Transparency act because we're going to lose the vote. And then once the law is entered, we'll just assert all of these things that we didn't like about it and not produce it anyway. Right? That's what they're saying. And do you remember during the shutdown when MAGA Mike was like, epstein, Epstein, Epstein. All they do is talk about Epstein. Here, let's play this clip right here.
- [21:23]
Midas Touch Network Co-host
President Trump has nothing to do with it. He has said himself he has nothing to hide. And, and that's clearly what they've been trying to do. They're trying to attack President Trump. This is what they've done. They weaponized the justice system over the last several years to go after him. And this is their latest attempt. And they don't have a platform or a principle to defend on the Democrat Party side. So they put all their eggs in this basket. And that's why you hear endlessly about Epstein, Epstein, Epstein. Everything's about Epstein.
- [21:51]
Midas Touch Network Host
And then of course, you had Donald Trump back in July. This is what he said each week there was kind of a different response about what he would say about Epstein. CNN made this compilation here. Let's play this clip right here.
- [22:05]
CNN Compilation Narrator
Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? I know it's a hoax. It's started by Democrats. It's been run by the Democrats for four years. They should focus on the fact that Larry Summers from Harvard, that Bill Clinton, who you know very well and lots of other friends, really close friends of Jeffrey Summers should be spoken about, you.
- [22:28]
Midas Touch Network Host
Know, and then now we're at the stage where you have Ro Khanna, Democrat, Thomas Massie, Republican. They were the sponsors. They were the ones who put forward this discharge petition. And they were saying, look, Pat Bondi should be arrested. Right? Um, she should be impeached. Right? These are crimes, like, these are clear and obvious crimes taking place before our eyes. Also before our eyes. Don't you see all the Trump distractions that are taking place? Like when the Epstein files were released, you had the Department of Defense, they announced Operation Hawkeye strike in Syria. We blew up isis, even though Donald Trump claimed that ISIS doesn't exist anymore and he destroyed isis. But now I guess it exists. And then we also learned that we have troops in Syria, you know, because ISIS killed our troops who are patrolled in Syria. Did you know we had troops in Syria? I mean. Well, we learned that altogether and apparently ISIS is there too. And then on Saturday, you had Pete Hegseth announce that our military seized a China based oil tanker.
- [23:32]
Joe from Vanta
That.
- [23:33]
Midas Touch Network Host
That's not a sanctioned Venezuelan oil tanker. It has a. It's. The tanker's technically registered in Panama, but it is a oil tanker that really belongs to China. And it was taking about 2 million gallons. 2 million barrels. Not the gallons. 2 million barrels of Chinese owned oil from Venezuela to China and the United States, like pirates took over that ship. Right now they're trying to create all these distractions as well while all this, while all of this is going on. So, you know, there, there you have it. We'll keep you posted every step of the way. But I really wanted to break it down in a comprehensive way so you can share this with friends and people you know and say, watch this because it shouldn't be a political thing. Like, I just want to let you, as a former lawyer who dealt with these issues, I want you to be armed with the, with the power. I want to empower you to be able to push back against this stuff. Anyway, thanks for watching. Hit. Subscribe. Let's get to 6 million. We appreciate you. Thanks for watching. Be sure to add the Midas touch podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcast for new updates every single day.