Loading summary
A
The holidays mean more travel, more shopping, more time online and more personal info in more places that could expose you more to identity theft. But LifeLock monitors millions of data points per second. If your identity is stolen, our US based restoration specialists will fix it, guaranteed your money back. Don't face drained accounts, fraudulent loans or financial losses alone. Get more holiday fun and less holiday worry with LifeLock. Save up to 40% your first year. Visit LifeLock.com podcast Terms apply this holiday.
B
Discover meaningful gifts for everyone on your list at K Not sure where to start? Our jewelry experts are here to help you find or create the perfect gift in store or online. Book your appointment today and unwrap Love this season only at Kay Imagine you're.
C
A business owner relying on a dozen different software programs. Each one is expensive, overly complicated and worst of all, none of them are connected. It can be incredibly stressful right now. Picture Odoo CRM, Accounting, Inventory, Manufacturing, Marketing, HR and more. Odoo brings all the tools your business needs into one simple platform and all seamlessly connected. Everything works together, giving you the peace of mind that your business is running smoothly from every angle. Odoo's open source applications are user friendly and designed to scale with your business, saving you time and money. Say goodbye to juggling multiple platforms and hello to efficient integrated management. Stop wasting resources on complic systems and make the switch to odoo today. Visit odoo.com o d o o.com and discover how Odoo can simplify and streamline your business operations. Odoo Modern Management made Simple A panel.
D
Of three federal judges in Texas, including a Trump appointee, just blocked Texas Republicans from using their new gerrymandered congressional map in 2026, ruling that it was an illegal, racially gerrymandered map and ordering Texas to revert to its 2021 map as Trump's redistricting power grab collapses. The author of this massive opinion is a federal judge named Judge Jeffrey Brown. Writing for the majority here, this three judge panel. It's a three judge panel because that's the type of panel that hears challenges to gerrymandering, challenges under the Voting Rights Act. And Judge Jeffrey Brown, appointed by Donald Trump in 2019, ruled that Trump and Governor Abbott's efforts to gerrymander Texas to pick up five congressional seats is unlawful. It was a powerful opinion. What you need to note as well, this has no impact on California's Prop 50 mid decade redistricting. So as it stands right now, California, based on the popular referendum of the people that was not an unlawfully racially gerrymandered proposition will get to pick up five congressional seats. And the Texas gerrymandered map has been deemed to be unlawful and racist. And it was a Trump judge who, who drafted the opinion. So Donald Trump can't be like, oh, wacko liberal judge. You appointed this guy, Donald in 2019. Judge Jeffrey Brown, I want to go through with you what Judge Jeffrey Brown, the Trump appointed judge in Texas wrote when he struck down the governor rabbit, Donald Trump mid decade gerrymander in Texas. So the judge starts off by quoting Chief Justice John Roberts, himself a right wing chief judge on the United States Supreme Court. Because clearly this Trump appointed judge was basically speaking to the chief judge and saying, if this case ever gets to you, I'm quoting you here about what you said. This is why this Trump judge wanted to make this opinion stick. I mean, he stuck the dagger and twisted it in Donald Trump right there. So he quotes Chief Justice John Roberts as saying, the way to stop, stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race. And the Trump appointed judge finds that Donald Trump and Governor Abbott discriminated on the basis of race when they engaged in an unlawful gerrymander of Texas. Here's what the opinion says. The public perception of this case is that it's about politics. To be sure, politics played a role in drawing the 2025 map, but it was much more than just politics. The substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered that 2025 map. Here's why. Earlier this year, President Trump began urging Texas to redraw its U.S. house map to create five additional Republican seats. Lawmakers reportedly met that request to redistrict on purely partisan grounds with apprehension when the governor announced his intent to call a special legislative session. He didn't even place redistricting on the legislative agenda. But when the Trump administration reframed its request as a demand to redistrict congressional seats based on their racial makeup, Texas lawmakers immediately jumped on board. On July 7, Harmeet Dillon, the head of the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice, sent a letter to the Governor and Attorney General of Texas making the legally incorrect assertion that four congressional districts in Texas were, were, quote, unconstitutional because they were, quote, coalition districts, majority nonwhite districts in which no single racial group constituted a 50% majority. In the letter, the DOJ threatened legal action if Texas didn't immediately dismantle and redraw these districts, a threat based entirely on their racial makeup. Notably, the DOJ letter targeted only majority non white districts. Any mention of majority white Democrat districts, which DOJ presumably would have also targeted if its aims were partisan rather than racial, was conspicuously absent. Two days later, citing the DOJ letter, the Governor Governor Abbott added redistricting to the special sessions legislative agenda. In doing so, the governor explicitly directed the legislature to draw a new U.S. house map to resolve DOJ's concerns. In other words, the the governor explicitly directed the legislature to redistrict based on race on racism. In press appearances, the Governor plainly and expressly disavowed any partisan objective and instead repeatedly stated that his goal was to eliminate coalition districts and create new majority Hispanic districts. The legislature adopted those racial objectives. The redistricting bill sponsors made numerous statements that suggesting that they had intentionally manipulated the district lines to create more majority Hispanic and majority black districts. The bill's sponsor statement suggests they adopted those changes because such a map would be an easier sell than a purely partisan one. The speaker of the House also issued a press release celebrating that the Bill satisfactorily addressed DOJ's concerns. Other high ranking legislators stated in media interviews and that the Legislature had redistricted not for the political goal goal of appeasing President Trump nor of gaining five Republican U.S. house seats, but to achieve the DOJ's racial goal of eliminating coalition districts. The map ultimately passed by the Legislature and signed by the governor, the 2025 map achieved all but one of the racial objectives that the DOJ demanded. The Legislature dismantled and left unrecognizable not only all of the districts DOJ identified in the letter, but also several other quote coalition districts around the state. For these and other reasons, the plaintiff groups are likely to prove at trial that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 map. So we preliminarily enjoin what Texas did here and it blocked Texas's map As the chilly days of fall roll in.
E
And the holiday rush begins, it's easy to forget about taking care of yourself. Enter MudWTR, a soothing yet energizing coffee alternative that helps you stay sharp and balanced through the busiest time of the year. Made from a blend of chai, cacao and calming adaptogens like lion's mane, Reishi and Chaga, MUDWTR gives you a natural boost without the crash or coffee jitters. MUDWTR is like your holiday self care ritual in a cup packed with antioxidants and wellness benefits that nourish your body while keeping you centered and clear headed through the chaos of the season. And as you prepare for the holidays. It makes the perfect stocking stuffer for anyone in need of a little extra self care. Whether you're powering through gift wrapping, decking the halls, or simply enjoying a quiet Moment to yourself, MudWTR is the ultimate way to bring balance and calm to your fall and holiday routine. Every single ingredient in mud WTR's products are 100% USDA certified organic, non GMO, gluten free, vegan and kosher. There's also zero sugar and no sweeteners added, making it a clean and wholesome choice for your wellness journey. The best part about mudwtr is it provides sustainable, sustained energy without the spikes and crash of traditional coffee. Using Mud water is as easy as cozying up on a crisp fall afternoon. Head to mudwtr.com and grab your starter kit for a limited time. Our listeners get up to 43% off your entire order, free shipping and a free rechargeable frother at M U d w t r.com Midas that's up to 43% off your order at m u d w t r.com Midas m e I dash after you purchase, they're going to ask where you heard about them. Please support our show and tell them we sent you this fall. Nourish your body and mind with Mud Water, a perfect addition to your self care routine as the weather cools and the days get shorter.
D
Now you go through more of the ruling and it says Background the Law Governing Racial Discrimination Challenges in Redistricting Plans because racial discrimination in voting cannot coexist with democratic self government, federal law provides various avenues for challenging an electoral map as racially discriminatory. There are at least three avenues to do so. 1. Racial gerrymandering First, a plaintiff can bring a racial gerrymandering claim under the 14th and 15th Amendments. A racial gerrymandering claim alleges that the state, without sufficient justification, has separated its citizens into different voting districts on the basis of race. The plaintiff must prove that the state subordinated race neutral districting criteria to racial considerations such that race was the predominant factor motivating the legislature's decision to place a significant number of voters within or without a particular district. 2. Intentional vote dilution Second, a plaintiff can bring an intentional vote dilution claim which is analytically distinct from a racial gerrymandering claim and follows a different analysis. An intentional vote dilution claim alleges that the state has enacted a particular voting scheme as a purposeful device to minimize or cancel out the voting potential of racial or ethnic minorities. Intentional Vote dilution violates both the constitution and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. To prevail in an intentional vote dilution claim, the plaintiff must show that the state's districting plan has the purpose and effect of diluting a minority vote. 3 effects based vote dilution called it Gingell's claim. Both of the first two claims require plaintiff to prove that the legislature acted with some sort of unlawful intent. To supplement these intent based causes of action, Congress amended the Voting Rights Act Section 2 to enable plaintiffs to challenge electoral maps based on their racially dilutive effects alone. Then the court says, for the foregoing reasons, the court grants the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary junction as to their racial gerrymandering claims. And it enjoins, it blocks the 2025 Texas map and says the state must use the 2021 map and its main piece of evidence, the smoking gun. It said, look at the DOJ letter. The DOJ letter said we want you to gerrymander on the basis of race. Because I suppose the DOJ thought that it would have a harder time selling this to Texas if they said we want you to do it based on politics and partisanship. So the DOJ said do it on race. And the court said DOJ said do it on race. You complied with this bizarre letter from the doj, an unlawful letter, and thus it's clearly racial gerrymandering. One of the things that the Trump appointed judge, by the way, all of this is written by a Trump appointed judge. And one of the things the Trump appointed judge said was he was very critical of the DOJ letter. It's challenging to unpack the DOJ letter because it contains so many factual, legal and typographical errors. Indeed, even attorneys employed by the Texas Attorney General who professes to be a political ally of the Trump administration describe the DOJ letter as legally unsound, baseless, erroneous, ham fisted and a mess. Now the Republicans who are likely gonna lose their seats in California are livid right now cuz they're saying maga. Mike, why did you allow this unlawful gerrymandering to take place in Texas and elsewhere? Cuz now you screwed us over in California, we're gonna lose our seats in California and Republicans are likely not going to gain any seats nationally. In fact, we may lose seats based on the incompetence with which this plan was implemented. California Republican Kylie tears into the redistricting push after the court just struck down the Texas map. Quote, to the extent there was any point to begin with which I don't think there was. I don't think even if you got a partisan advantage on this, it in any way, shape or form justifies it. But that's not even gonna happen, it looks like. And with this court decision, it's even more in doubt. So it's just utterly foolish. It was a total failure of the leadership MAGA Mike Johnson to let this happen in a way that is going to be bad for our own members, bad for the House, bad for representation across the country. And Kylie said that Johnson should have publicly opposed redistricting and just struck a truce with Hakeem Jeffries to leave the status quo in place until the decade is up across the country, in which case everybody would have basically disarmed and we would have just had normal elections. But no, MAGA Mike had to keep it going and it backfired in their face. As Paul Mitchell said, Since everybody's asking, no, this doesn't undo Prop 50. The trigger language was removed in the legislative process as it was clear that Texas was redistricting. So even if their map is invalidated and postponed in Texas, the Prop 50 map stays in place. Now California Governor Gavin Newsom is mocking Donald Trump. Quiet piggy. Piggy. Quiet piggy. Because Donald Trump calls female reporters that horrible name. Governor Newsom is telling Donald Trump that you're the piggy, Donald. You're the piggy and a loser. Anybody? Everybody hit subscribe let's get to 6 million. Thanks for watching this analysis.
F
Love this video. Support independent media and unlock exclusive content ad free videos and custom emojis energies by becoming a paid member of our YouTube channel today. You can also gift memberships to others. Let's keep growing together.
Date: November 19, 2025
Hosts: Ben, Brett, and Jordy Meiselas
This episode delves into a seismic judicial development in Texas: a three-judge federal panel, including a Trump-appointed judge, has struck down Texas Republicans’ attempted gerrymander for the 2026 congressional elections. The ruling, penned by Judge Jeffrey Brown—appointed by Trump in 2019—declares the state’s redistricting efforts unlawful and racially discriminatory. The Meiselas brothers unpack the legal reasoning, the political backfire for Republicans, and the national implications, all while highlighting the irony and instant karma for Trump and his allies.
[01:46–08:46]
[03:30–08:30]
[10:32–14:00]
[13:35–15:40]
The Meiselas brothers blend legal analysis with biting humor, directness, and clear democratic values. Their style is energetic, irreverent, and unsparing—especially in underscoring the irony that a Trump-appointed judge delivered a fatal blow to Trump’s electoral strategy. They mix close readings of the legal opinion with running commentary on the absurdity of the situation, occasional mockery of Trump and the GOP, and a focus on larger implications for democracy.
This episode spotlights a dramatic twist in American political maneuvering: a judge appointed by Trump himself derails a major Republican gerrymandering effort in Texas, citing illegal racial discrimination. The “karma” is not just poetic—it’s legal and immediate, undermining GOP plans nationwide and drawing rare union in criticism from both Democrats and disillusioned Republicans. The brothers’ coverage is equal parts educational, incisive, and entertaining, making clear that, sometimes, the architect of a strategy is undone by their own design.