Investigative Journalist (7:26)
We also are learning that Ghislaine Maxwell, who spoke with Donald Trump's number two at the doj, Todd Blanche, who used to be Donald Trump's former criminal defense attorney. That's what Blanche's role was. Well, Ghislaine Maxwell, she's supposed to have her deposition taken by the House Oversight Committee on Monday, even though she spoke with Todd Blanche, she's now going to invoke her Fifth Amendment rights because she doesn't want to talk about what she knows about Donald and other people. And she's going to refuse to answer all of the questions from the House Oversight Committee despite the fact that her deposition was moved back from August till now because she said she had to wait until the Supreme Court ruling on her case so that she'd be able to testify because she said she would have to invoke her Fifth Amendment rights while the Supreme Court had not ruled. Well, the Supreme Court ruled against her. They didn't overturn the conviction that she's a child sex trafficker she said she was going to testify and now she's going to invoke the fifth. Do you see cover up after cover up after cover up here? I want to go through it with you in this methodical detail, but here's a March 2025 email from FBI agents Cash Patel's department where the FBI discusses internally the clear and specific guidance to redact images of former US Presidents, Secretary of State and other celebrities who may be in the files. Now let's talk about though, that DOJ 86 page prosecution memo. The prosecution memo is dated December 19 19th, 2019. Notably, when I reviewed all 3 million documents in the Epstein files, one of that have been produced so far, the partial release of documents, that is one of the things I noticed is where's all the internal communications and internal memos and deliberative process information, intra office inter office communications? Where are the FBI victim interviews, survivor interviews? They just weren't there. But this one was produced which I found interesting. But then all of a sudden it was deleted from the public database. Fortunately we downloaded it here at the Midas Touch network so we have a copy of it that you can look at by going to midasplus.com we posted it on our substack midasplus.com but as Julie K. Brown writes, DOJ's 86 page prosecution memo listing possible co conspirators in the Epstein case and the victim's allegations against those possible co conspirators disappear, disappeared from their website after the Miami Herald questioned them about the list. So take a look over here. You'll notice on top of this memo, this is the 86 page prosecution memo. It says privileged attorney work product deliberative process confidential, subject to federal rule of Criminal Procedure 6e. And you'll see it says to Jeffrey Berman, he was the main United States Attorney, the lead federal prosecutor for the Southern District of New York during this time period. It's from all of his AUSAs, but for whatever reason their names are redacted. I'm not sure why it's redacted. One of them should be Maureen Comey who the Trump regime fired. She was the one who prosecuted Epstein and Ghislaine. It's dated 12-19-2019 and it says investigation into potential coconspirators of Jeffrey Epstein. And the memo says this memorandum details the investigative steps taken since the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein in this district on July 2, 2019 and analyzes the extent to which certain of Epstein's associates and employees may or may not be criminally liable for their conduct during their employment with Epstein. You'll note that that is dated after Epstein died. Epstein died in early ish August. But when I was going through this document, one of the things I noticed is that. Go to page 69, 72, 79. I can keep going through these where it's supposed to mention the co conspirators. All of that is redacted. Like all of those names are redacted. There are certain portions that reference maybe other people. But most of this document is still redacted. But it was made public. None of that should be redacted and this document should still be made public. We should know who all the co conspirators are, right? Like this. When people talk about lists, this 86 page prosecution memo would be a list of co conspirators. And the analysis by the DOJ at that time in 2019 about whether these people on the list should be prosecuted. Now look, in 2019 it would make sense for there to be what's called a deliberative process privilege. Because if you charged these individuals the deliberative process privileges like your work product, your memos, your inter office communications, that stuff is not made public during criminal cases in general you have to produce all the evidence that you have against the criminal defendant. They're presumed innocent until they're found guilty. But you wouldn't turn over all of your inner office emails. It would be giving away today's the super bowl, for example. It would be giving away your playbook to the other side. Instead of you have to show what the happening in the game. We don't give away the playbook but for purposes of the Epstein Transparency act the whole thing is reveal your playbook, the deliberative process, the inner office emails and memos. That's precisely the type of stuff that we want to see in the Epstein Transparency act transparency. Because we want to know who are on the list, who are you considering charging? Why didn't you charge them? That's precisely what we want. And Even when this 86 page prosecution memo was made public, these key, the key names were redacted. You see all these pages redacted, but now they just deleted it and think that we're stupid. So we saved it. And what I suppose should happen now is that if you look at the Bates number over here, you see this efta. Let's take a look at the Bates number, bottom right. EFTA 2731082 by the way, you see there's another Bates number there. Because all this stuff was made available, was ready to be produced years ago if they wanted to. There was no reason for any delay here, but we should just ask in a public records request. And people are doing this, produce EFTA 02730182, that whole series of Bates numbers and all of these other internal memos and remove the redactions because that violates the Epstein Transparency Act. Aaron Parnas, who's got his own great YouTube site and he works with the Midas Touch network as all as well. Aaron also learned the following from his sources. Epstein survivors tell me that they were told in meetings with Republican lawmakers that everyone was supportive of asking Pam Bondi hard questions about the Epstein files when she appears for her testimony. This week. She's testifying before the House Judiciary Committee. But afterwards, they were told by a source in the Republican establishment that those questions won't be asked. Republican members have been told to avoid any questions about the Epstein files and to only focus on the, quote, positives that Bondi accomplished during her testimony. So again, it's cover up after cover up after cover up. Finally, FBI agents equipped with a signed warrant prepare to document blood splatter and bullet holes in Renee Good's suv. But they received orders to stop from Cash Patel. And at the highest levels of the Trump regime, the New York Times reports the fear a civil rights investigation would contradict Donald Trump's claim that Good violently, willfully and viciously ran over the ICE officer who fired at her as she drove away her vehicle. So you have Joseph Thompson right here, one of the top federal prosecutors in Minneapolis. He did the right thing in the sense that he wrote in an email to colleagues that the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, a state agency that specializes in investigating police shootings, would team up with the FBI to determine where the shooting had been, whether the shooting had been justified and lawful, or had violated Renee Nicole Goode's civil rights. That's the appropriate protocol, even though it should be obvious to us on the video that our civil rights were violated. You go through the investigation, you do blood splatter reports, you do a search warrant to determine if excessive force was used. That's the normal protocol. But later in the week, FBI agents equipped with a signed war and prepared to document blood splatter and bullet holes and miss goods SUV received orders to stop. And instead, what the Trump DOJ said, what you need to focus on is, is the opposite, an assault on the officer and whether Renee Nicole Good's wife was responsible for the murder of Renee Nicole Goode and That's when all those prosecutors in Minneapolis resigned. Right here. Just share this with you as well. Other Epstein emails. This is why this is so deeply serious. Saturday, October 19, 2013 from somebody who's redacted. Why is this name redacted right here to Jeffrey Epstein. Is she too old for you? Lol. Well, I will hunt my other Czech friends and Epstein says too old. Who's that person and why are they redacted? Who is being protected right here? How about this? In a 2018 email, Epstein casually acknowledges himself as a sex trafficker with no denials. He says he met someone who was working on a movie about a sex sex trafficker who had a private island with sex slaves and he informed her that that's him and she's doing a movie about him and she didn't realize that she was talking to the guy she's making a movie about and quote, she almost fainted. Or how about this? Aaron Parness reports, who sent Jeffrey Epstein an image of what appears to be a 10 year old child. And why is this redacted? Age 10? How sick and disgusting can you get? I mean, by the way, can I share this with you as well? So back in 2017, there were these pranksters who tried to set up Prime Minister Carney, who at the time was the lead banker for the bank of England. He was the lead governor of the bank of England. So the pranksters wrote this to Prime Minister Carney. They said something like this, actually, I'm glad to hear from you. Someone was posing as Anthony Hopgood. I don't think it was actually Hobgood, who's a business person in the uk. I'm glad I heard from you. I'm having summer nights themed soiree on Saturday, June 17. As much martini as you can take. Are you free? And then Mark Carney says, sounds ideal. We'll check at home and at work. And then this person posing as Anthony Hopgood in 2017 says, Excellent, I've hired some rather dashing bar ladies. Is that PC? If you ask for crystal glasses, you'll be able to admire their enchanting dexterity. I keep those glasses low down.
