A (5:09)

I'll say this is beyond the scope of what I'm prepared to testify to today. I'd be happy to take the question for the record in regard to the analysis that you cited here. Then you had Democratic Congressmember Robert Garcia go to the floor of the House of Representatives because the MAGA Republicans put forward a piece of legislation that that would lower the age to prosecute minors as adults from 16 down to 14 in DC. First, let me show you what Congressmember Garcia said. Play this clip.

C (5:45)

I want to remind our Republican colleagues that crime in D.C. over the last few years have actually been going down. And quite frankly, the idea that we are now going to put middle schoolers in prison, this should be called the Middle Schoolers for Prison act, is inhumane and shameful. We can all agree that crime should be taken on that D.C. and other cities we want to make safer. But this idea that we're going to penalize children in middle school at the age of 14 and put them in prison is irresponsible and quite frankly, it's un American. I want to remind my colleagues that at this moment, what we're doing right now is stripping 700,000 residents who have come together in D.C. to create laws to bring community together to fight for statehood and representation. We're going to strip them from their ability to manage their own city. These efforts do nothing to reduce crime or improve public safety. And once again, I know that the President is obsessed with Washington, D.C. he's obsessed with its local laws. I ask him once again, he should step down as president and run for mayor if he's so interested.

A (7:06)

By the way, even Republican Thomas Massie from Kentucky had something to say. He said, tonight Congress will vote to lower the age to prosecute minors as adults from 16 down to 14 in D.C. so let me get this straight. Congressmember Massey said Congress wants to prosecute 14 year olds as adults, but they don't want to prosecute adults who sexually abuse 14 year olds. Release the Epstein files. And of course, you know what Cash Patel said at the hearing yesterday? Just to remind you when he was asked by MAGA Republican Senator Kennedy about who else is in the Epstein files and who did Epstein traffic to Cash Patel said that there's no credible information from the FBI that Epstein trafficked to anybody else. He was a lone wolf is what they're going with now to try to cover up Donald Trump's dark past. They're going with Epstein was a lone wolf. Utterly disgusting. Here, play this clip.

B (8:09)

You've seen most of the files. Who, if anyone, did Epstein traffic these young, young women to besides himself?

A (8:19)

Himself? There is no credible information. None. If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals. And the information we have, again is limited.

B (8:30)

So the answer is no one.

A (8:32)

For the information that we have in the files, in the case file.

D (8:37)

Okay, all right, I'm just gonna say it. I'm obsessed with laundry sauce. I never look forward to laundry day until I started using their pods. The Mojave peach scent is unreal. It starts with this bright mandarin and cinnamon, and then you get that juicy peach with a little sandalwood and vanilla at the end. It literally smells like you're stepping into a five star hotel every time you open the dryer. And it's not just the smell. These pods actually work. High performance clean with a high end fragrance that lasts all day. Plus, they take all the guesswork out of it. You just toss in one pod and go. If you want something a little more citrus and crisp, go with the Italian bergamot. Something a little more tropical and chill. Indonesian patchouli is incredible. They also have a scent quiz on their site so you can can find your new signature. For a limited time only. Our listeners get 20% off your entire order when you use code MIDAS20@laundry sauce.com that's 20% off your order@laundry sauce.com with promo code MIDAS20MEI DAS20. After you purchase, they'll ask where you heard about them. Please support our show and tell them we sent you it's time to make laundry day the best day of the week.

A (9:40)

Now I'm going to show you some other Democratic Congress members pushing back against the MAGA Republican absurdity. But let me show you Marjorie Taylor Greene at this congressional hearing where she wanted to bring up the topic of weather modification and cloud seeding. Because one of the kind of conspiracies that MAGA Republicans push is that all of these storms that are taking place right now are the result of human cloud seeding and weather modification and not climate change and not global warming. That's why they push this. My own view is of course we need to analyze weather modification. We need common sense solutions and we need to understand what it is to make sure that it isn't dangerous. So I agree with that. But that's not how MAGA Republicans are using this issue. They're using it to spread conspiracies that when there are these disastrous storms taking place that it's some secret government plot that's doing it. But then again, Marjorie, Donald Trump's running the government right now. So how are you? Anyway, here's what Marjorie Taylor Greene had to say at the hearing yesterday. Play this clip on weather modification. Let's play it.

E (10:55)

Do we believe in God and that he has dominion over his perfect creation of planet Earth? Do we believe that he has given us everything we need to survive as a civilization since the beginning of time? Or do you believe in man's claim of authority over the weather based on scientists that have only been alive for decades and weren't here to witness the climate changes since the beginning of time? This is why I've introduced my bill, the Clear Skies act, to end weather modification and geoengineering. Because I don't believe planet Earth is a lab and I don't believe people are lab rats. I believe that people have the right and they have the God given right to have clean air Clean skies, clean water and clean food.

A (11:43)

And here she is again. Let's play this clip.

E (11:45)

What we've learned here today has been fascinating. I hope the people watching at home have been able to see the radicalized positions on the other side of the aisle. Remember, if you even question that someone could control the weather, you were labeled a conspiracy theorist or crazy. Then they change the message to, well, it's not hurting anyone and it is to provide water for people. And now they've come full circle around to the point that modifying the weather is how they save the planet from the global warming hoax. Whether you agree or not, the people clearly disagreed with the climate hoax and disagreed with my Democrat colleagues.

A (12:29)

Now I want you to contrast that to Democratic Congresswoman Melanie Stansberg. I want you to watch this full clip because first off, Congresswoman Stansberry deserves far more attention than she gets. She is an incredible Congress member. She is diligent, she comes with receipts. She's fact based. And this is the type of leadership that I want to see more of. Fact based, science based, data based. Let's take a while. Watch this whole clip. She says DOGE is back and what's the GOP up to? Rooting out waste, fraud and abuse? Nope. They're using DOGE to platform climate denialism and anti science theories. You saw that right there. Here, play this clip.

F (13:13)

DOGE is back and there's going to be a lot to unpack in this hearing. But I think first and foremost we want to acknowledge that the purpose of this subcommittee is and why it was created in the first place by the majority was to root out waste, fraud and abuse. That's literally the mandate for the DOGE subcommittee. And I want to emphasize that we remain focused on that mission. In fact, we are working on a report on the waste, fraud and abuse that we're currently seeing in this administration. And I think it's important to also recognize that we are 14 days from a government shutdown. And so I'm troubled to see that the subcommittee, which is designed to address government spending to streamline efficiency of government programs, has strayed so far from its mission, especially as there's such pressing matters facing our country, including a government shutdown. The passage of the big ugly bill, which not only drove the federal deficit by $4 trillion, but is kicking millions of Americans off their health care and about to make their health care premiums go up, tariffs that are causing inflation to go up and put small family businesses out of business. An administration that's flouting the rule of law every Day. And a total lack of transparency in the Epstein case is the administration has still refused to comply with the subpoena that this committee issued. So there's a lot of important things that this committee could tackle. And I would think that a topic involving environmental science would be more well suited to a committee that actually deals with science or environmental issues. But I am happy to talk about climate change and weather modification. It's a topic that I've spent many years of my career working on. In fact, I worked more than 20 years as a water resources manager working on drought and water planning issues in the state of New Mexico. And I know how important addressing drought and water issues is for our farmers and ranchers out there. And personally and professionally, there's a lot to discuss with respect to weather modification. And so if we're going to talk about it, let's talk about it. Certainly there's a lot of Doge related topics we could talk about with respect to climate change and weather programs, including the dismantling of climate, natural resources, emergency response programs, the firing of federal officials, dismantling of epa, the illegal freezing of federal funding, removal of the US from international climate agreements, dismantling clean energy programs, catastrophic response to natural disasters, including what we saw in Texas, and all of these top topics would be ripe for an oversight hearing. So I hope that we can use this hearing to discuss some of those issues. But with respect specifically to weather modification, whether it's cloud seeding or other technologies, I actually agree with many of the assertions about the need for further discussion, further science, and potentially further regulation of these particular technologies. But it's important that we distinguish between fact and fiction, between clickbait and real solutions. So let's talk about some facts. Weather modification and cloud seeding, as was mentioned, it's a real thing. It exists. It has been practiced in varying forms since the 1940s. Increasingly, folks are looking at this as a opportunity to increase rain and precipitation. But the science is still out on many of these technologies. And we absolutely need to understand what are the implications for air quality, for precipitation, and the implications also for water rights in the west, because this could have far reaching implications. But it's also important to understand that many of these technologies are in the R and D phase. They're in limited use in a number of states, and it's not actually technologies that the federal government even widely supports. This is largely in the private sector. In the world of science, it is widely acknowledged that more science is needed and to understand use, efficacy and impacts of these technologies. So those are the facts. Those are the facts. But it's hard to understand why we're discussing banning these practices outright in this committee when the Oversight committee, in another subcommittee, literally as we're sitting here right now, is having a hearing about dismantling the Environmental Protection Agency. And the actual bill under discussion in this committee is trying to use the EPA to regulate these particular practices. So the inconsistency in governance is very confusing here. But there's a more insidious issue here which I think we've already heard in some of the comments, which is the using of the platform of Congress to proffer anti science theories to platform climate denialism and to ultimately put our communities at risk of by continuing to put out disinformation.

A (18:15)

Now, finally, I want to show you Democratic Congresswoman Summer Lee. Here's what she's got to say. She similarly deserves far more attention than she gets. I think she is a very strong Congresswoman. She's always calling out the lies. And what you notice the difference is that Marjorie Taylor Greene is out there in that performative way attacking science, attacking common sense. And here you have these Democratic Congress members just speaking to the people about actually helping them. Just imagine that Congress members helping the people here. Play this clip.

G (18:49)

I believe we incarcerate too many people in this country. I believe the criminal legal system disproportionately harms communities of color and people without resources. I believe we should be skeptical of expanding criminal penalties as a first resort. But this committee applies these principles selectively. When environmental enforcement protects communities from toxic pollution, suddenly we care about proportional punishment. When it's the corporations that face accountability for poisoning the air children breathe, suddenly criminal penalties are excessive. When businesses with multimillion dollar monthly revenues face consequences for breaking the law, suddenly we discover concerns about government overreach. Where is the same compassion for the teenager caught with marijuana? Where is this concern about disproportionate punishment for the mother struggling with addiction? Where is this skep about criminalization when it affects people who don't have corporate lawyers and public relations teams? The answer is nowhere. Because this isn't really addressing over criminalization in our government. It's about who deserves protection from government power and who doesn't. The selective application of justice principles reveals everything about our priorities. Environmental crimes that harm entire communities get sympathy hearings. Street level offenses get mandatory minimums. Corporate executives get understanding. Working families get prison sentences. The communities breathing polluted air like mine deserves better. The children in those communities deserve a government that protects them, not one that protects the corporations that's poisoning them. They deserve the same concern this committee shows for corporate defendants. Until every person gets the same consideration we've shown here today for environmental lawbreakers, our criminal legal system will remain fundamentally unjust.

A (20:34)

Well, there you have it, folks. Let me know what you think. Hit subscribe. Let's get to 6 million subscribers together. Want to stay plugged in? Become a subscriber to our substack@midasplus.com you'll get daily recaps from Ron Filipkowski ad free episodes of our podcast and more exclusive content only available@midasplus.com you're a guy who just wants to look nice. The kind of nice where you might get a nice compliment on the niceness of your nice new outfit. Good thing Men's Wearhouse has everything from polos to jeans and yes, suits. Plus a team to help you find the perfect fit to make sure you look nice nice. Love the way you look. Men's Warehouse.