
A baby is born with three parents, Charlie Kirk calls on Protestants to venerate Mary, and Shane Gillis makes an Epstein joke at the ESPYS. Click here to join the member-exclusive portion of my show: https://bit.ly/4biDlri Ep.1773 - - - DailyWire+: Join millions of people who still believe in truth, courage, and common sense at https://DailyWirePlus.com Ben Shapiro’s new book, “Lions and Scavengers,” drops September 2nd—pre-order today at https://dailywire.com/benshapiro GET THE ALL-NEW YES OR NO EXPANSION PACK TODAY: https://bit.ly/41gsZ8Q - - - Today's Sponsors: Boll & Branch - Get 20% off, plus free shipping on your first set of sheets at https://BollAndBranch.com/knowles Manukora - Head to https://manukora.com/KNOWLES to save up to 31% + $25 worth of free gifts with the Starter Kit, which comes with an MGO 850+ Manuka Honey jar, 5 honey travel sticks, a wooden spoon, and a guidebook! StopBox USA - Get firearm security redesigned and save 10% off @StopBoxUSA with co...
Loading summary
Michael Knowles
Nikola Tesla is said to have warned that we will live to see horrors beyond our comprehension. Yesterday, doctors in the UK announced the birth of eight babies, each one made in a test tube with DNA from not two but three parents. I'm Michael Knowles. This is the Michael Knowles Show. Welcome back to the show. Shane Gillis was hosting the ESPYs. I did not watch. I'm not the biggest sports guy in the world, but at the ESPYs Gillis made a Jeffrey Epstein joke and this is a serious and growing political problem for Republicans. I will dispense my pearls of wisdom to you, but first go to bolanbranch.com knolls this is one of the pearls of wisdom, actually that I can dispense to you. You know that feeling when you invest in something truly well made, like those leather boots that only get more comfortable with each wear? That solid wood table that'll outlast three apartments? That is what you're going to get with Bolin Brand sheets. They're crafted with that same philosophy of lasting quality. While most bedding deteriorates, these sheets actually get better and softer wash after wash, making them one of those rare purchases that it keeps rewarding you long after you've made it. What sets them apart is they're 100% organic cotton in this breathable, durable weave that you can feel the quality of immediately. I've had my Bolen Branch sheets. Well actually I've had Bolen Branch sheets for years and years and years. I had I think one or two sets and then I just recently got another set because they're so good and multiple US Presidents have slept on it and your favorite podcaster has slept on them. So not the exact same ones. Bowl and branch and you can get your own. They back it up with a 30 night worry free guarantee. You can try them risk free. See for yourself. Get the best savings of the season during Bowlen Branch's annual summer event. 20% off plus free shipping on your first set of sheets@bolenbranch.com knowles bolenbranch that's b o l l a n d branch.com knowles if 20% unlock free shipping, limited time only exclusions apply. Eight babies born in the UK after IVF using DNA from three people. That's the headline. And before you recoil in horror that we've now made human persons with three parents, just listen to the first paragraph. So genetic material from mother and father transferred to healthy donor egg to reduce risk of life threatening diseases. Okay, well that makes it sound really nice. First paragraph. Doctors in the UK have announced the birth of eight healthy babies after performing a groundbreaking procedure that creates IVF embryos with DNA from three people to prevent the children from inheriting incurable genetic disorders. The mothers were all high risk for passing on life threatening diseases to their babies due to mutations in their mitochondria, which are the tiny structures that sit inside cells and provide the power they need to function. That's probably one thing. If you remember anything from 8th grade biology class, it is that the mitochondria are or the powerhouse of the cell. So anyway, this sounds really nice on the surface, and yet we all recoil in horror when we read the headline. Why? Why is that? Because that's how all temptation works. On the surface, it always sounds like a good thing. That's why it's tempting on the surface. The people who give no care to bioethics are gonna say, well, these moms were at risk of passing on a bad condition to their kids. So, you know, we did this little procedure, we just did a little scientific, advanced procedure. And now the kids aren't gonna have the genetic disorders. What could be wrong with that? And it only starts to look a little dark when you peer below the surface. So, for instance, you've now created human beings with more than a mommy and a daddy. Now there's a mommy and a daddy and another mommy, I guess. What does that do to a child's identity? You have now exerted a very serious degree of control over the DNA, not only of that human person, but of every human being down the line. You've exerted a godlike power over the genome, over the roadmap of the cell, over the blueprint of life. For, for every child down the line, did the grandchild consent to that? Did the great grandchild consent to that? Is consent even the chief moral criterion here? How did you make the babies in the first place? Well, you used ivf. So through ivf, that means that you got a guy to perform a disgusting and gravely disordered and sinful action. Then you put a woman through a very painful and seriously invasive procedure, and then you created a bunch of babies and some of those babies you worked with here to inject new DNA into them, to inject them into new DNA or whatever the scientists do, and then the rest of them you discarded or you froze in a freezer forever until you eventually ultimately discard them. How did you do that? Maybe you did it by selecting the sex. Maybe you said, okay, I only want boys, I don't want girls, or I only want girls, I Don't want boys, so because I don't like girls, I'm gonna kill them. Or because I don't like boys, I'm gonna kill them. Or, or because I want some perfect combination, the rest of them I'm just going to kill. Now, because you're using the process of ivf, you could very easily implant these babies into women that are not the mothers. And so you could be robbing them of knowing their natural mother or father. You could be using a surrogate and then robbing the kids of the only mother they've ever really known. All for what? So that you can reduce the risk of a child or a parent suffering. Far from a guarantee, but just a risk. Also that you can play God. And so ultimately, when we get to these issues, the question has to be, would you rather live in a world made by God and controlled by God, or a world in which you presume to create and control everything? Who do you think is going to be better at playing God? God or you God who is perfect and all good? You, who are not God who knows everything. You who know basically nothing. I know the reaction to this is going to be. Michael, you just sound like a Luddite. You sound like you're retrograde. You sound like you just want to let children inherit genetic disorders. You sound like you just want to allow people to suffer and not advance in science. No, no, no. I'm all for scientific advancements. I frequently say I, I don't wanna go back to 2012 as many so called conservatives do. I don't wanna go back to the politics of 13 years ago to 2012. I wanna go back to the politics of 1220, but I don't wanna go back to the dentistry of 1220. I don't wanna go back to everything from 1220. I'm happy for certain scientific advancements, but they have to be ethical. You do not have the right, in the name of science or progress to violate the moral order. No end is so good that it justifies immoral means and the same kind of stupid moral reasoning you're gonna hear here. Well, healthier babies is always a good thing. It's the same argument you hear for IVF in general, which is. Well, more babies is always a good thing. I thought we were pro life. Any way you can make a baby, That's a good thing in my book. Well, is it? You can make a baby through rape. Are you okay with rape? No, no, of course. No one's okay with. Okay, so then you're granting there is at least One circumstance in which you can arrive at a good end, the creation of life, the begetting of life, but through an immoral means. That would be unacceptable and that would not be justified. Well, how about the same here? It seems so good when you. Well, what, you're against curing embryos, you're against curing kids, you're against reducing the likelihood that babies and parents suffer? No, no, no, I'm not against that. That all sounds really good. But at what cost? At the cost of doing something intrinsically evil with all sorts of totally predictable consequences, just some of which I've laid out here. No, this is the Faustian bargain. Hey, you can get the good thing, but you gotta do an evil thing. And it doesn't pay off. It never pays off, but it always sounds good. That's how it entices people. Okay, speaking of babies conceived in unusual ways, really beautiful clip from my friend Charlie Kirk's show yesterday. This was making the rounds a little bit because Charlie is quite Protestant. He's a very prominent voice among Protestants. He's really prominent voice among just political conservatives generally. But he's got a special interest in faith and Christianity. He loves to explore matters of faith, Talks to all sorts of people, talks to Catholics, mackerel snappers like me, talks to atheists. He's a curious guy, and he had this to say about Christianity. But let me first say, I think we as Protestants, evangelicals, under venerate Mary. She was very important. She was a vessel for our Lord and Savior. I think that we, as evangelicals and Protestants, we've overcorrected. We don't talk about Mary enough. We don't venerate her enough. Mary was clearly important to early Christians. There's something there. In fact, I believe one of the ways that we fix toxic feminism in America is Mary is the solution. 100%. Have more young ladies. Be pious, be reverent, to be full of faith. 100%. Slow to anger, slow to words at times. Mary is a phenomenal example and I think a counter to so much of the toxicity of. Of feminism in the modern era. Preach, Pastor Charlie, preach. I love it. I love it. You know, Charlie and I have talked about religion for a long time now. He's talking about religion with a lot of people for a long time. And I love to hear him say this. And actually, about a year, two, two or three years ago now, maybe, I was speaking to a very, very prominent evangelical Christian, you know, Protestant pastor. And I won't say his name because it was a private conversation. He may have said these things publicly too, but he said basically what Charlie said here. He said, you know, Michael, I think evangelicals don't venerate Mary enough. I was kind of surprised to hear this. And he went on and gave similar explanations to what Charlie said there. Some of the stuff Charlie's talking about. So true. You know, Mary was obviously very important to early Christians. This is undeniable. You know, we have the Rylands papyri. These are papyri papyrus from antiquity. There's one, the Rheilands Papyrus470. This is from AD250. This is. So you're talking about the middle of the third century, long predating even the Council of Nicaea. And we see a prayer to Mary referring to Mary as the Mother of God, not merely trying to divide the person Christ into two persons or trying to have a clean demarcation, as if to say that Christ's divine nature and human nature mean that he's really two people, or his divine nature is an illusion, or his human nature is an illusion, or any manner of ancient heresies. No, no. The prayer from antiquity, long before the Council of Nicaea says, mother of God, do not despise our petitions in adversity. Not only acknowledging Mary as the Mother of God, but also praying to Mary. We know that Christians did this from at least the middle of the third century and certainly much earlier than that. We also have just From Scripture, Luke 1, Hail full of grace. Hail Mary, full of grace. All generations will call her blessed. This is a special woman. And we even have evidence of Mary as mediatrix. So like we have from St. Irenaeus, this is in the second century teaching that Mary's. Yes, when the angel Gabriel comes down and says, you're going to conceive a child, and she says, yes, I'm the Lord's servant. His will be done. That this untied the knot of Eve's disobedience, as Eve, by disobeying, became the cause of death for herself and the whole human race. So Mary, by obeying, became the cause of salvation for herself and the whole human race. The cause of salvation. That's St. Irenaeus. St. Irenaeus is a disciple of Polycarp, who is a disciple of John the Apostle. St. Irenaeus himself himself might have been a disciple of John the Apostle. So why do I mention all of this? Why bring all of this theology and ancient history into this conversation of Charlie Kirk, who mostly hosts a political show? Because it's a sign of the times, okay? Charlie is he's an unusual figure because, well, he's extremely successful. He's effectively running the Republican Party. He's a big figure in politics, didn't go to college self taught. He's an alum of the Lincoln Fellowship at the Claremont Institute. He's a really intellectually curious guy, so he loves to pursue the truth as he can find it. And he's doing what a lot of us did, even those of us who did go to college, where we said we didn't really get a full education there, we gotta play catch up in our 20s and in our 30s. And so he's learning things. He's really interested in not only knowledge generally, but understanding the knowledge that formed our civilization, things that have deep roots. And he says, you know, I came to this conclusion. Mary's actually really important. And going all the way back to the earliest days of the church, Mary was really important and she should be important for us too. We need to maybe return to a little bit of tradition. We need to pay more attention to what our forebears thought. We need to rediscover some of these forgotten truths or truths that have been forgotten, at least in certain communities. This is. Charlie is not only in part a cause of some of the great developments we're seeing in politics, but he is a sign of the times too, because this is what's happening. It's happening among Protestants, it's happening among Catholics and Eastern Orthodox, it's happening among atheists. Even there was a return to faith. The fashionable Reddit fedora tipping atheism of the 2000s done deader than disco super lame. Christianity is hot again, ever ancient, ever new. It's where we went from 20 years ago thinking only stupid people believe in religion to thinking only stupid people are atheists. Because we're now rediscovering the intellectual tradition of Christianity. We're rediscovering the liturgical aspect of Christianity. There's a movement among conservative Protestants to retake the mainline Protestant churches, which have totally fallen into liberalism, in disarray. I don't know if that's gonna work, but at least there's an impulse in that way. There's a movement among evangelicals to dig into some of the trad of Christianity. And obviously you've seen a huge uptick in conversions to Eastern Orthodoxy to some degree, and especially to Catholicism, to the oldest, most liturgical, traditional smells and bells, ancient kind of theology. That is a sign of the times. And the sign is that we are here in the year of our Lord 2025. We've just come off this high of modernity and innovation and saying, forget about the past and we're gonna knock down statues. The people in the Dark Ages are dumb and we know everything. To realizing we don't know everything. We know actually much less than our forebears did. We know much less than our grandparents did. For goodness sakes. Things have fallen apart. We don't get married anymore. We don't have babies anymore. We can't sustain our political order anymore. We can't even protect our borders. Something has fallen apart in our political thinking which relies on practical morality, which ultimately comes down to religion, man. Maybe we need to rethink that. That's what's happening. You get all of that and more and a very good theology out of that. Clip from Charlie this is good stuff, man. Whenever. Some people, you know, conservatives, they just want to be down in the dumps all the time. And it's always about how the west is over and everything's lost and it's all going to hell in a handbasket. These are good developments. Speaking of signs of the times, while the Republicans are going in one direction, Democrats are going in another in a very different direction, and it's creating a lot of problems for Democrat candidates. Hold on, Honey I want to tell you about some delicious honey if you go to manukora.com knowles are you looking for something simple and tasty to add to your wellness routine? I certainly am, because wellness routines often involve things that aren't tasty and that are exhausting and tedious. So give yourself a little treat. Manukura honey is exceptional because it offers incredible flavor and remarkable health benefits. This rich, creamy honey is ethically produced by master beekeepers in New Zealand's remote forests, where bees collect nectar from the native Manuka tea tree. I find it's too difficult for me to personally collect the nectar from the Manuka tea tree, so I want New Zealand bees to do it for me. What makes this honey special is its impressive nutritional profile. It contains three times more antioxidants and prebiotics, an ordinary honey providing powerful support for your immunity and gut health. It even contains mgo, a special antibacterial compound that comes from the tea tree nectar. You can use it as a healthy sweetener, but also just one heaped teaspoon each morning is all you need to benefit from those amazing bioactives. I love it. Not only does the Knowles family love it, but Mr. Davies, all these people around the Daily Wire love it too. Now you gotta try Manukora honey. Go to manukora.com knowles save up to 31% plus 25 bucks of free gifts with the starter kit, which comes with an MGO 850 plus Manuka honey jar, five honey travel sticks, a wooden spoon. I love the spoon. And a guidebook. That's manukura.com, m a n u k o r-a.com knowles save 31% plus 25 bucks worth of free gifts. Speaking of signs of the times, a CNN pollster. CNN pollster is shocked at how anti Israel Democrats have become. Andrew Cuomo during the primary attacked Mandani as being insufficiently pro Israel. I'm not quite sure the former governor understood how much the politics have changed around this issue among Democrats. What are we talking about here? All right, who Democrats sympathize more with, Israelis or Palestinians? In 2017, the Democratic Party was a pro Israeli party. Look at this. They sympathize with the Israelis by 13 points. More with the Israelis than the Palestinians. But look at this sea change now. Democrats sympathize more with the Palestinians by 43 points. Oh my God. That is a change in the margin of 56 points over the course of just eight years. So all of a sudden it's the pro Palestinian position that actually reigns supreme in Democratic politics, not the Israeli position. And that is part of the reason why Mandani was able to do so well in this primary. Because those attacks over Israel, simply put, did not ring true for Democrats. That's an unbelievable swing. The CNN pollster is right to be that shocked. You're talking about a 56 point swing in what, eight years, 2017 to today, a 56 point swing. So when Democrat politicians like Andrew Cuomo, who was just trying to run for mayor of New York and got blown out of the water by Zoran Mamdani, the socialist Muslim millennial, who's gonna become the next mayor of New York. I'm not surprised that Quinn would say this guy, he's anti Israel, he's pro Palestine. This is crazy. And be totally unaware that the Democrats have completely flipped on the issue. Completely flipped. Now why is that? I wanna bookend something for a second. In part public opinion for Israel. Public approval has dropped because of Israeli actions. Just today there was news that Israel hit, I guess accidentally, the one Catholic church in Gaza. So now you have the Pope talking about this. Okay, not great. Not a good look for the state of Israel. Okay, so, but I wanna bookend that for a second. Bookend the Israeli actions and the military actions. Cause I don't think that's the whole story. I think there is something kind of funny and maybe darkly funny about the criticism for Israel beyond actions like that, which is the Democrats hate Israel, the Zoran Mamdani types hate Israel because they view it as a Western imperial project. And some elements, many, many fewer, but some elements on the right hate Israel because they view it as an anti Western project. So you see, the state of Israel is being hit for almost opposite reasons. The libs say this is just a bunch of white people coming into the Middle east, which belongs to the brown people for some reason. The Arab conquest of the Levant is the only just conquest ever in the seventh and eighth centuries. And so now it belongs to these people and no white people are allowed anymore. And the Jews are white and which isn't even totally true, and the Jews are white and they came in and Israel's a colonial project set up by the British in the un. And anyway, that's why it's evil, because it's Western. And then there are some elements on the right that say, no, no, no, no, you misunderstand leftists. The reason Israel is evil is because it's anti Western. But we can all agree that we hate Israel and the Jews, but at least Israel. Okay, it's kind of a funny thing if you can laugh about such matters. It's being attacked for opposite reasons, but that's the big shift. And so in New York, New York is a Democrat town mostly. And that's what's going to play. Zoran Mamdani is going to play. But people should not be confused here. Mamdani is not anti Israel because he's an Islamist, because he's a follower of Sayyid Qutib, because he's a Wahhabi or something like that. Far from it. I would be surprised if this guy took Islam seriously at all. You know, it's funny, we were speaking earlier about ancient Christian heresies and specifically the heresy of Nestorianism that tries to divide Christ as human and as God. And it prob. Probably was the ancient heresy of Nestorianism that helped to kick off Islam in the first place because Muhammad went on a merchant trip with his uncle, was it Abu Talib, and ran into a heretical Christian monk. And I think the monk. It's unclear exactly what heresy he took part in, but he very well might have been a Nestorian. So in any case, you see these heresies come down the line. Even if you think, as I do, that the Islamic theology is rather mistaken. I don't think Mamdani's think about that at all. I think he's just a regular library. And the reason the libs attack Israel is not because they care about the intifada in the way that Hamas does. It's because they hate the west and colonialism and imperialism and all the rest of it. So on the Mamdani front, there's an update. There's a big update. And you know how much I hate to say I told you so, but I've been saying that from the beginning. I said all these conservatives are attacking Mamdani as though he were Osama bin Laden. It's just farce. He's not. In many ways, if Mamdani were a serious Islamist, a jihadi even, he would be easier to deal with. He would be more reasonable than these leftists and these communists who speak about queer liberation and other gobbledygook. Well, Mamdani was asked if he supports globalizing the intifada. This is a phrase used by the left especially since the Gaza war kicked off. And Mamdani refused to condemn the phrase Globalize the intifada. What does globalize the intifada mean? It means promote jihad and specifically attack Jews, but attack other people too, but especially Jews. Globalize the intifada. And he said, I'm not going to condemn that phrase. Well, what do you know now that he's the nominee. Reported in the New York Times. So Ranmam Dani is not going to use the phrase. He doesn't like the phrase as much anymore. He said that he would discourage others from using the phrase because it's seen as a call to violence. New York Times saying these comments came in a closed door meeting with roughly 150 business executives at the offices of Tishman Speyer in Rockefeller center hosted by the Partnership for New York City, a consortium of members representing banks, law firms and corporations. Yeah, when you're in a room surrounded by Jews, you probably want to downplay your Intifada cred. But he would have done it anyway. He would have done it anyway because as I said from the beginning with Zoran, it's not that he's an Islamist. No way. I don't even know that he's all that ideological as a leftist. As a. The phrase they use for it now, it used to be politically incorrect, then it was woke. Now we call it gay race communism, but it's the same kind of radical leftist ideology. I don't even know if it's that. I think the guy wants power. I think he's wanted to be president since he was in the womb. And he realized that there's a system of sticks and carrots that encourages ambitious young politicos to adopt certain positions, like radical leftism, to identify as a minority, in this case a religious minority, pretend to be Muslim, even if he doesn't go to mosque very much, to identify as a racial minority. That's why he pretended to be a black guy on his college application. And so he saw that system of incentives. And if the system of incentives had been otherwise, if the system of incentives had been toward the right, then Zoram Mamdani would probably be wearing overalls, playing banjo, calling himself Bubba. Okay? Had it been more for a conservative identity, you'd get that out of him too. Now he's trying to moderate a little bit and just fall into the fashionable leftism of New York. So my answer to that is, well, if you want to have a political order that's a little more sensible, you just gotta change the incentives. And that's why it's so important that Trump and the Supreme Court are going in and getting rid of affirmative action programs and diversity statements on college applications. Part of the reason is you need to create new incentives in the culture to gain power. And if the current incentives are become a radical leftist, you're going to get a ton of radical leftists because the class of sociopathically ambitious kids is just always going to go where the power is, create those new incentives. You're gonna get a new political order. Culture is downstream of politics. Okay? Now, speaking of that, speaking of really codifying cultural movements into law. Great news coming out of the office of the Vice President and out of Congress coming out of the Senate. Hold on one second. I have something that's very important for your peace of mind and for your security. Go to stopboxusa.com, use code Michael M I C H A E L. If you are a responsible gun owner, you know the struggle. You want your firearm secure from kids and guests, but when you need it, you don't want to be fumbling with keys or codes while your heart's racing. That is exactly why StopBox USA created the StopBox Pro. This thing is totally mechanical. No batteries to die, no electronics to glitch, no apps to crash. Just a brilliant five button system that is unique to you. Once you got it down, your muscle memory takes over. No thinking, just reacting. It's great. I even have one here at the office. It's great. You know me, I'm a little more old school, I'm a little bit more analog. I Don't always trust the gadgets. This is a really brilliant combination of sturdy old technology with new innovations. Here's the great part, everything is made right here in the usa, so you're supporting American jobs and getting quality craftsmanship you can trust. The Stopbox Pro is also TSA compliant so you can travel with confidence. And they've got vehicle safes, chamber locks and other gear to keep you prepared wherever life takes you. For a limited time only, our listeners are getting a crazy deal on stopbox. 10% off your entire order when you use Code Michael. For even better savings, shop through bundles for the best deals on their best selling products. Check out their bundles. Save an exclusive 10% off site wide when you use code Michael. At stopboxusa.com, discover a better way to balance security and readiness with stopbox. Vice President J.D. vance has cast the tie breaking vote to enshrine Doge cuts the Elon government efficiency cuts specifically to foreign aid into law. One of the big criticisms was that Elon's gonna come into the government, he doesn't really have the authority to make these cuts and he's doing all of these cuts. But they're not, they might not have any effect immediately. And even if they do have an immediate effect, they're not gonna have a long term effect because Congress needs to get involved and this is all just coming out of the White House. And what can be signed into law with executive orders and pens can be taken out of law just as easily. Well, there was a 5150 vote where the Senate had a rescission request. So to pull back some of the funding that had been set aside, this was out of the Appropriations Committee. Despite the centrists and the squishes who didn't want to cut foreign aid, worried this would impact global health in the American empire. It's the usual suspects. Lisa Murkowski, Senator from Alaska, Susan Collins from Maine, Mitch McConnell. Now they voted no, didn't matter because that meant that the VP President of the Senate could walk over from the White House, cast the tie breaking vote. It's not just executive orders. It's not just executive orders. Here the Republicans. Even with a challenging situation, getting Republicans in Congress to do anything is like herding cats. And yet we are seeing stuff get done. The eos would be good, but we are seeing stuff get done. And not just the big legislative achievement, the big beautiful bill, but we are seeing an effective, competent administration. More effective and more competent than we saw in the first term. Good stuff. It's not as splashy doesn't get as much play as scandals or fake scandals or non traversies from the establishment media, but it's pretty good stuff. Now, speaking of Republicans in Congress, I got some bad news. There's some guy, Gabe Evans. Gabe Evans is some millennial congressman, I guess he's a Republican and he has this bright idea we're winning on a lot. We're winning on a lot of stuff. Coming out of the White House a little bit coming out of Congress. Trump won the popular vote running en masse. Deportations, that's now a mainstream majority political issue. So what are the Republicans in Congress going to do? The Republicans in Congress who can't win for losing, who clutch defeat from the jaws of victory. The only thing they can do, they're going to push for amnesty. Hi, I'm Congressman Gabe evans from Colorado's 8th congressional district. And today I am so happy to be able to help introduce the bipartisan Dignity Act. I'm the grandson of immigrants from Mexico. And so this bill is particularly important to me because it does three critical things. It makes sure that we have resources to secure the border. It helps us crush the criminals, the cartels and the gang bangers that are in our community illegally and causing criminal problems. But it also provides a pathway for hard working immigrants who want to come to the United States, work hard, raise their family, be a contributing part of the American dream. And this is something that I've heard from the employers and from the Latino community in my district. They want that path forward, to be able to comply with the law and earn their version of the American dream. That's what the Dignity act does. And I'm so honored to be able to help introduce it today. Yeah. No, no. I'm gonna say no. I don't know. Gabe Ovens, maybe. He's a nice guy. Gabe, if you're watching this, nice to meet you. No, no. Delete that video. Delete that legislation. Delete that video. With Republicans like this, we don't need Democrats. Are you out of your mind? Are you out of your ever loving mind? We won the election on immigration. Not just immigration, not just enforcement of the border, not just deporting criminals. We won the election with the popular vote and 46% of Hispanics on mass deportations. We have 11 to 16 million illegal aliens in the country. That's a very conservative estimate. They're not all wearing face tattoos, worshiping Satan. Very few of them are, actually. Many of them work very hard. That's not the point. The point is they broke the law. They came into this country illegally. Their first action in this country was to disrespect us, violate a basic law. They're taxing our resources. They are. By flagrantly violating the law. It's not that we wouldn't have let them come in legally had they done the right thing, but maybe we would have, maybe we wouldn't have. That's our right as citizens. It's about sovereignty, it's about justice, and it's about social solidarity. No freaking amnesty. What's a matter with you? What is a met these people? Ah, you know, I lose my temper about two, maybe three times a year. Crazy stuff. Delete that video and delete that legislation. And any Republican that. That votes for this stuff, that votes for mass amnesty after the 2024 election, like five seconds after the 2024 election. Any, any Republican congressman who votes for that, delete them from the Congress rolls. Okay? Send them back to the private sector. Get them out of government. Completely insane. Maybe he's a nice guy. Delete that video. Now, speaking of the state of the gop, President Trump is very upset about the fact that some people are still talking about Jeffrey Epstein. He's railing against Republicans and he is now being criticized by people who say he's turned on his base. I don't think that's what's going on. I think what's going on has a lot more to do with Congress. We'll get to exactly what he said in a second. First, though, we are celebrating a decade of The Daily Wire. That is 10 years of saying the quiet part out loud and building something that actually matters, something the libs can't cancel or burn down. We are not slowing down. We're scaling up with new talent like Isabel Brown. Her new show premiering this fall. New docs like journey to the UFC, the Joe Pifer Story premiering Friday, July 25th. Here's the thing. Members get it all first. The drops, the trailers, the truth uncensored. Plus, you get to connect with a community that does not think biology is optional. Celebrate 10 years with us. Join now@dailywireplus.com My favorite comment yesterday is from Chestnut Gun Shop. When my daughters started middle school, I told them almost weekly, never let anyone take a picture of you doing anything you don't want your mother to see. Great. Great point. I said this yesterday to everyone who watches the show, but especially the young people. I know there are a lot of very young people who watch the show. Teenagers, 12 year olds, 11 year olds. There are young people who come up to me at events and they say, oh, hello, Mr. Knowles. I watch your show. So anyway, this is to all of you, but to the adults, too. Don't. Don't ever send a photo of yourself nude or in a compromising position to anyone. Let me go further. Don't ever take a photo of yourself in that kind of position. Nothing good can come from that. And what you're gonna say is, well, everyone does that. Now, I don't care that everyone does that. Do I have to? Am I your father now? I gotta talk to you like you. If everyone drove off a bridge, would you drive off a bridge? The liberals would. This was a great point. I think Adrian Vermeule, the great Harvard Law professor, made this point yesterday on X. He said, for liberals, the only criterion for making judgments is social proof, because they're not rooted in anything eternal or lasting, lasting, really, at all. So it's just, well, if everyone's doing it, it must be the right thing to do. But that's not how we. They're wrong. Don't do that. No nude pictures. No sexting. No, none of that. Don't do that ever. I don't care what age you are. I don't care if you're 52. In fact, in some ways, it's worse if you're 50. Don't. None of that. That was very good advice that you gave to your daughter. Okay? President Trump very irritated at the state of the gop. President Trump has written a lot on truth. The truth. Social posts have gotten longer. Says the radical left Democrats have hit pay dirt again. Just like with the fake and fully discredited Steele Dossier, the lying 51 intelligence agents, the laptop from hell, which the Democrats swore come from Russia. No, it came from Hunter Biden's bathroom. Even though speaking of weird nude selfies, sexting, even the Russia, Russia, Russia scam itself, a totally fake and made up story used in order to hide crooked Hillary's big loss in 2016 presidential election. These scams and hoaxes are all the Democrats are good at. It's all they have. They're no good at governing, no good at policy, no good at picking winning candidates. And unlike the Republicans, they stick together like glue. Okay, so there's the flip. The preface is to remind you of how many, not just how many times the Democrats have tried to get Trump, but he's reminding you how many times. It seemed like Trump was totally on the ropes and he was done and his career was over and he was going to jail and he was. And then he survived and now we forget about a lot of those nontroversies. And he lived through all of these. He had to really fight like a dog to get out of these things. So he's reminding you, hey, you think this is a big problem. It's a tempest in a teapot. That's the subtext. Then he goes to what he really wants to talk about. He says, the Democrats stick together like glue. We don't. Some of my supporters are attacking me over the Epstein thing is their new scam. This is what we will forever call the Jeffrey Epstein hoax. And my past supporters have bought into this BS hook, line and sinker. They haven't learned their lesson. They probably never will. Even after being conned by the lunatic left for eight long years, I've had more success in six months than perhaps any president in our country's history. And all these people want to talk about with strong prodding by the fake news and the success star of Dems is the Jeffrey Epstein hoax. Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work. Don't even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success because I don't want their support anymore. Whoa. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Make America great again. I don't want their support. So I think this is being misinterpreted. We've talked about the Epstein thing ad nauseam, so you know my views on that. I think the government needs a better answer on it. I think people want justice and it's not necessarily that they want full transparency. I don't think governments are in the business of full transparency, but we want justice and so the government needs to make clear that some justice is being done. People do want some answers, no doubt about it. But that's a separate point actually to what President Trump's talking about here. Cuz he says, I don't want the people who are incessantly focused and yelling at me over Epstein. I don't want their support anymore. I think this is being misinterpreted as him saying, you know, the ordinary run of the mill rank and file MAGA guys who, you know, donated and showed up to the rallies. I don't like you anymore. I don't think that's what he's saying. I think this, he might as well have written this truth social post to Congress. I think he might have opened this up with dear Congress, dear Thomas Massie, dear Marjorie Taylor Greene, and then written the rest of it. I think this is to his politician supporters, the people in his coalition, because you now have guys like Thomas Massie, Libertarian, teaming up with Democrats to try to force the release of the Epstein files, which many people might like, but the Democrats don't like it because they want transparency in government. Democrats like it because it's a way to attack Trump. And that's how Trump's viewing it. And so Trump is viewing some of his political enemies, the Democrats, plus his political enemies within the Republican Party, Thomas Massie and his erstwhile supporters, people like Marjorie Taylor Greene, coming after him for this. And he's viewing this as a loyalty test or a betrayal. And I think the Epstein issue is secondary or tertiary in his mind. It might be primary in most people's minds, but that's not how he's viewing this. The key line to this post is the Democrats stick together like glue, but Republicans don't. That's what this is about. This is the most real threat to his coalition yet. I don't think that it's the end of maga. I don't think it's likely to be the end of maga, but this is the most real threat to the coalition yet. And conservatives need to learn how to stick together like glue. And part of that is gonna be at some point, you're already starting to see some movement on this, but you have people who are not haters of Trump, you have some of Trump's strongest supporters saying, hey, we gotta do something else. The Epstein issue is not gonna go away. You gotta offer something. And I think that that's gonna be important to keeping the coalition together. This is not just another. The bond market is failing for a day. This is not just the panic ends. This does have some legs, and there's a way out of it, but you gotta work on getting out of it. Okay? Now, speaking of. Speaking of the Epstein issue, Shane Gillis decided to make this a feature of his monologue while hosting the ESPYs last night. Donald Trump wants to stage a UFC fight on the White House lawn. The last time he staged a fight in dc, Mike Pence almost died. You don't have to do that. It was fine. I didn't write it, actually. There was supposed to be an Epstein joke here, but as it got deleted, must have probably deleted itself, right? Probably never existed, actually. Let's move on as a country and ignore that. Okay. All right. So you see, I actually like that they included the Mike Pence clip at the top because I like Shane Gillis. I think he's very funny. But Shane Gillis is a fence sitter. Politically, he is not. He's not on the right, he's not on the left. He is a fence sitter and he is a weather vane. He's a very funny guy too. But he doesn't wanna upset the left and he doesn't wanna upset the right. And he's gonna go basically where the median voter is. I think that's what he wants to do in the podcasting realm. You see Joe Rogan, the greatest podcaster ever. Joe Rogan is the avatar of the median voter. That's part of why he's so effective. Shane Gillis is doing the same thing in comedy. And so what guys like Shane Gillis are joking about not what NBC is joking about, not what some stupid left wing comedians, but what Shane Gillis is joking about, what Joe Rogan is talking about. That is a decent gauge of where the zeitgeist is, of where the culture is. And right now, the administration needs to do everything it can not to lose the median voter. This is political advice going all the way back to Antonio Gramsci and further back. You gotta have the common sense. And Trump won with the popular vote, with huge swaths of every demographic because he had the common sense and the libs lost the common sense. And right now there is a fear and there's a concerted push to try to suggest Democrats now have the common sense on this disclosure issue. And the Republicans don't have the common sense anymore. They're being duplicitous or they're being deceitful. And it doesn't, it doesn't have to be that way. I don't think that is really how it is. But the movement is real. Hold the common sense, hold the Shane Gillises, hold the Joe Rogans. Hold tight. This is a real threat. Okay, Speaking of Trump wins, there's a major, major Trump win coming out of Maha. President Trump tweeted out. He said, I'm being slightly facetious, but only slightly. He says, I've been speaking to Coca Cola about using real cane sugar and Coke in the United States. They've agreed to do so. I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca Cola. This will be a very good move by them. You'll see. It's just better. It's just better. The sugars. And you might say, well, who cares, Michael? We're talking about the world order. We're talking about espionage, we're talking about serious crimes. And you wanna talk about Coca Cola. This is a concrete win. It's a concrete Maha victory. Trump formed this new coalition by bringing in people who were historically liberal, the crunchy hippie types who worry about the food supply. They were uniformly on the left 10, 15 years ago. Now they're on the right. And he delivered them a real concrete win. Not even through legislation, not even through an executive order, but by bullying a corporation, making them use real cane sugar. Not that cane sugar is like, good for you. It's not that you should be guzzling Coca Cola with real sugar. That's also bad for you. But that's a win. That's something concrete groups and his coalition wanted, and they're getting it. They want to get rid of seed oils, they want to get rid of high fructose corn syrup. He got that for them by just picking up the phone and talking to the head of Coca Cola. That's a win. And I think the administration can point to a lot of these and wants to do more of it. We're going to say, hey, you didn't support me in vain. I gave you what you wanted. I'm gonna deliver on Maha. I'm gonna deliver on no new wars. We were told we're gonna get World War III in Iran. We didn't get that. We're gonna deliver on wages for workers. We're gonna deliver on immigration. They're delivering on that. We're gonna deliver. We're gonna deliver. We're gonna deliver. That's how you're gonna win. It's gonna be these concrete victories. The libs, Barack Obama. We'll have to get to this tomorrow. The libs have been promising all this abstract nonsense about like, you know, gender identity or whatever. And they. They lost their. Their coalition. They lost the common sense. These concrete wins are gonna. Are going to help. And so the issue with Epstein is that was a concrete win that the coalition was expecting. Here you go. Here are the files. Here's the binder, here's the whatever. There's gotta be some way for the administration to. To be able to claim a victory here. Okay, before we get into the member block, it's Theology Thursday. I wanna thank all of you. I really wanna thank you. Cause I mentioned at the tail end of the show yesterday, there was this new charitable cause that had come to my attention. And it's a Charcot Marie tooth disease. It's this genetic condition inherited by little kids that causes them to lose a lot of their mobility, you know, in wheelchairs and stuff, by the time they're teenagers. Really, really damages their life. And. And a geneticist in Cyprus seems to have found a cure. But they need to raise money for toxicology studies and the final round of clinical trials and all the rest. And so often this happens where you got what looks like pretty reliably a cure and you got a ton of patients, thousands of patients, the little kids who need it, but you can't get the cure to the patients because you can't raise some money. So anyway, I mentioned that, I said it came to my attention because my friend's kid was diagnosed with this condition. They've raised a ton of money, they're very, very close, but they were having trouble getting over the last hump and the creme de la creme, man, you guys completely came through. That's beautiful to see. For those who have not given yet, by the way, the address is justgiving.com page cureforgeorge. Justgiving.com page cureforgeorge But I said, I said if everyone gives a dollar or less than a dollar, 50 cents or something, they'll be off to the races. And so many of you didn't donate a dollar, you donated $10, $100, more than that, $1,000. Who knows, some of you could donate $10,000. There's some well heeled people in the audience, but even people who said, but I want to help out and give a buck or two. So sweet, really wonderful, so beautiful to see. Thank you to all of you. If you haven't done it yet, there's still time. JustGiving.com page CureForGeorge. I greatly appreciate your generosity. And now you get a great tax deduction at the end of the year and you don't have to give money to old Uncle Sam. All right, that's good too. Thank you. Thank you again. Okay, it's theology Thursday. The rest of the show continues now. You do not want to miss it. Become a member. Use code Knowleskin at WLES at checkout for two months free. And all annual plans.
Podcast Summary: Ep. 1773 - Science Gone Too Far: Babies Born From THREE People's DNA
Podcast Information:
Key Discussion: Michael Knowles opens the episode by addressing a groundbreaking yet controversial scientific advancement reported in the UK: the birth of eight healthy babies through an IVF procedure that incorporates DNA from three donors. This technique aims to prevent the transmission of incurable genetic disorders by transferring genetic material from the mother and father into a healthy donor egg, thereby reducing the risk associated with mitochondrial mutations.
Notable Quotes:
Ethical Concerns: Knowles expresses significant ethical reservations about this procedure, emphasizing the moral implications of altering human DNA and the potential long-term consequences on identity and genetic integrity. He raises questions about the consent of future generations affected by these modifications, likening the act to a "Faustian bargain" where seemingly positive outcomes are achieved through morally questionable means.
Analysis: Michael argues that while the scientific intention is noble—aiming to eradicate life-threatening genetic conditions—the method undermines natural human reproduction and imposes a level of genetic manipulation that could have unpredictable and possibly detrimental effects on human identity and diversity.
Key Discussion: Shifting from bioethics to theology, Knowles highlights a compelling segment from Charlie Kirk, a prominent voice among political conservatives and Protestants. Charlie Kirk advocates for the increased veneration of Mary, the mother of Jesus, within Protestant and evangelical communities. He posits that Mary serves as a counterbalance to the "toxicity of feminism," promoting virtues like piety, reverence, faith, and patience.
Notable Quotes:
Historical Context: Knowles references early Christian texts and traditions, such as the Rylands Papyrus from AD 250 and the teachings of St. Irenaeus, to underscore Mary’s integral role in Christian theology. He underscores the historical significance of Mary as a mediator and a foundational figure in combating disobedience and fostering salvation.
Implications for Modern Conservatism: By invoking Mary, Knowles suggests a return to traditional values and a reconnection with historical Christian teachings as a means to address contemporary social issues, particularly those emanating from modern feminist movements.
Key Discussion: Knowles delves into a significant political shift within the Democratic Party concerning its stance on Israel. Citing a CNN pollster, he highlights a dramatic change from 2017 to 2025, where Democrats have shifted from being pro-Israel by 13 points to pro-Palestinian by 43 points—an astonishing 56-point swing.
Notable Quotes:
Political Ramifications: This realignment has profound implications for Democratic candidates, who now risk alienating their traditional pro-Israel base. Knowles critiques Democratic leaders like Andrew Cuomo for attacking pro-Israel candidates, failing to recognize that the party's electorate has fundamentally shifted its sympathies.
Underlying Causes: Knowles attributes this change to a growing anti-Israel sentiment rooted in perceptions of Israel as either a Western imperial project or, conversely, an anti-Western entity, depending on the political faction. He suggests that this ideological confusion weakens Democratic coherence and positions.
Key Discussion: The conversation transitions to internal conflicts within the Republican Party, particularly surrounding immigration policy. Knowles criticizes Congressman Gabe Evans of Colorado for introducing the bipartisan Dignity Act, which proposes securing the border while providing a pathway to citizenship for hard-working immigrants.
Notable Quotes:
Critique of the Dignity Act: Knowles vehemently opposes the act, labeling it as a betrayal of Republican immigration principles. He underscores the importance of law enforcement and the rule of law, arguing that granting amnesty undermines national sovereignty and justice.
Broader Implications: This debate highlights a rift within the GOP between traditional hardline immigration stances and more moderate or pragmatic approaches aimed at addressing the complexities of undocumented immigration.
Key Discussion: Addressing President Trump's criticisms, Knowles discusses the ongoing controversy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. Trump accuses Democrats of perpetuating the Epstein narrative to undermine him, while expressing frustration over factionalism within the Republican Party.
Notable Quotes:
Impact on GOP Unity: Knowles interprets Trump’s stance as a reflection of broader challenges within the GOP, emphasizing the need for cohesion to maintain political strength. He warns that internal divisions and external attacks on figures like Trump could erode the party’s foundational support.
Strategic Recommendations: He advocates for Republicans to unite more effectively, drawing parallels to successful media personalities like Joe Rogan and Shane Gillis, who appeal to the median voter by balancing comedic and relatable content with substantive political discourse.
Key Discussion: Highlighting President Trump’s negotiation prowess, Knowles cites a seemingly minor yet symbolically significant victory: Coca Cola's agreement to use real cane sugar in its products in the United States. He frames this as a tangible win that satisfies specific consumer demands.
Notable Quotes:
Symbolism of Small Wins: Knowles uses this example to illustrate how accumulating small victories can solidify a political coalition’s support base by addressing specific, tangible issues that resonate with constituents.
Political Messaging: He underscores the importance of delivering on promises to maintain voter trust and loyalty, arguing that such wins, though minor, cumulatively strengthen the administration’s credibility.
Key Discussion: Knowles shifts to a more personal note, offering stern advice to young listeners regarding the dangers of sexting and compromising photographs. He emphasizes the importance of personal responsibility and moral integrity over succumbing to societal pressures.
Notable Quotes:
Critique of Liberal Moral Standards: He criticizes liberal ideologies that prioritize social proof over ethical principles, advocating instead for enduring moral standards to guide personal behavior.
Protective Guidance: Knowles reinforces the message by addressing both young individuals and adults, stressing that compromise on personal ethics can lead to detrimental consequences, regardless of societal trends.
Key Discussion: As the episode wraps up, Knowles touches upon the importance of sustaining a conservative movement grounded in traditional values, ethical governance, and cohesive political strategy. He reiterates the need for Republicans to unify and address internal conflicts to effectively counter Democratic strategies.
Call to Action: He encourages listeners to stay engaged, support conservative causes, and uphold the moral and ethical standards he advocates throughout the show.
Summary: In this episode, Michael Knowles navigates through a spectrum of pressing issues—from the ethical dilemmas posed by advanced IVF technologies and shifting theological perspectives within Christianity, to the evolving political landscapes concerning Israel and immigration within the Republican and Democratic parties. He critiques internal GOP disagreements and external Democratic strategies, emphasizing the necessity for unity and moral clarity within the conservative movement. Additionally, Knowles offers personal advice aimed at fostering integrity among young listeners, underscoring the broader themes of ethical governance and societal responsibility.
End of Summary