
Loading summary
A
As authorities begin to take a closer look at left wing terrorism, which Democrats have spent years telling us does not exist, the sheer scope of it is shocking even to those of us who've seen it firsthand. Now, even events that we had previously attributed to nature seem connected with an arrest yesterday. Making us ask, were the LA fires left wing terrorism too? I'm Michael Knowles. This is the Michael Knowles Show. Foreign. Welcome back to the show. It's a jean jacket. Thursday, everybody. Do you know why it's a jean jacket? I just got this cool jean jacket because it's a Mayflower jean jacket. I was just given this. This is a very sweet gift that I got. It's very cool. And I don't, I know some people are going to, they're going to be shocked. This is going to rock their world. This is going to be, they might start yelling. Well, I promise you won't be yelling and screaming as much as the Democrat leading candidate for governor of California, Katie Porter. We got the goods. I'm Katie Porter, freaking out over being asked a question. First though, I want to tell you about Pure Talk. Go to PureTalk.com knowles When was the last time you bragged about your wireless company, like, hey, hey, Johnny, did you know my wireless company gave away a thousand American flags to deserving veterans and forgave a million dollars in veteran debt? Did you know my wireless company raised almost half a million dollars to prevent veteran suicide? When was the last time you bragged like that? Well, it was probably pretty recent. If you're a wireless company, it's Pure Talk. There's a lot to brag about with PureTalk and you especially can brag about the coverage that you get. A 5G network that is insanely fast, dependable and secure. But the thing that I really like to brag about, I've had Pure Talk for years now. Yes, you're getting that top 5G coverage, but you know me, I'm a cheapskate. You're saving a lot of money, a lot of money. You get unlimited Talk, unlimited text, 15 gigs of high speed data, which is more than I suspect you're ever gonna need for $35 a month with a mobile hotspot. Cause they sometimes charge for the mobile hotspot. That's where they get you. I know you're thinking, you're like, no, but that's plus this fee and that fee and that's actually $100 a month. It's not. It's 35 bucks a month. Switch to my wireless company, PureTalk, if you need another reason, something you can brag about. PureTalk is the only wireless company that gives you a free one year membership to Daily Wire. Plus, when you go to PureTalk.comKnowles choose a qualifying plan at PureTalk.comKnowles relish your free one year membership to DailyWire. Plus PureTalk Wireless. Worth bragging about. You can't get this jean jacket yet. What do we think in the comments? Let me know. Can I pull it off? Am I like Fonzie? Should I put a cigarette behind my ear? Go, you know, roll dice behind the high school gym? Okay. There are more serious issues to talk about, like left wing terror. Now, obviously, in recent weeks, we've been talking a lot about left wing terror. The left has been covering up the left wing terror, pretending it does not exist. And yet we're seeing incidents after incidents. We are also seeing the left broadly defend political violence. But when you apply a little bit of scrutiny, when you take that closer eye, you see that even events that had previously been considered politically neutral or even that had been attributed to nature might have this tie in. Remember the LA fires, the fires that burned down one of America's major cities? The left blamed it on climate change. Of course, they blame every. They stub their toe in the morning to say it's climate change. But even the right had blamed it on political mismanagement. And there was a lot of political mismanagement. Gavin Newsom was warned by Donald Trump years ago that he wasn't taking proper efforts to clean up the wildlife, to clean up the grass. And he wasn't maintaining the environment of California enough. He was mismanaging the water. He was allowing water to run off into the Pacific to save the precious delta smelt. Meanwhile, reservoirs, fire hydrants were not being supplied with water. That would be necessary in the case of forest fires, which were frequent in California. So anyway, that's where the blame was. Now the FBI is upending both of those narratives and saying, no, no, no. The fires were started intentionally by an apparent left winger. So here are the facts. I don't want to get too ahead of our skis here, but the facts are the Palisades Fire burned up 23,400 acres. The Palisades Fire burned down almost 6,800 structures. Many, many homes. A dozen people died. They're now saying, according to a report from the D.C. reporter, they're now saying that this guy, this random guy, started the fires. This guy, if you look him up, he was living in Los Angeles, not employed. His income was something like $2 or something. He donated $1 to Joe Biden Cause you know, political donations are made public. So again that's being reported right now. It's unclear. This is all breaking. This guy allegedly looked up a bunch of stuff about fires. He allegedly generated AI images of cities burning and he searched this question, can you be at fault for a fire if your cigarette starts it? Now the search makes you think, well, it could have been that this guy was just up in the Hollywood Hills and he was smoking and he accidentally lit the fire and then he was trying to cover his tracks. That happened one time. Actually, one time I was visiting LA early, early on. I was smoking a cigar up by the Hollywood sign and people were screaming at me and I thought they were just anti smoking fanatics, but no, they realized that my ash could set the entire city ablaze. I didn't know that at the time. So anyway, I understood that maybe this guy just had the bad luck and the negligence to do that. No, no. If you look at the images, he clearly thought about this more consciously. Looks like he was a firebug. Looks like he was. Well, pretty clearly he was on the left. If he was a Joe Biden donor. Now, those two events might not be connected the arson searches and the fact that he donated to Democrats. It could be the case that his politics had nothing to do with the arson. But yet again, we're seeing left wing people introducing lots of disorder into society. Obviously in the case of Antifa or an assassin or any of these groups that ransack the crisis pregnancy centers there, the link between the ideology and the political violence and disorder is very tight. In this case they might be looser. But again, how many incidents? The mass migration, the illegal immigration, the gangs in our cities, that's all pretty closely related to left wing ideology, even if it's not direct, Even if the trend Nicaragua gangster is not, you know, a leftist with a coexist bumper sticker on his car. He is introduced into the community because of the left. There's the left introducing the disorder. All the weird sex stuff, it might not be consciously ideological, but all the weird sex stuff is being promoted in our communities because of left wing ideology. This guy, this weirdo firebug. I don't. If the facts that are being reported are accurate, then the LA fire has started because of a disturbed leftist. And at a certain point you just have to ask how much more of this are we going to tolerate? Because the argument in recent weeks from the classically liberal right has been we just need more debate, we need more openness we need less censorship, we need more. We just need to double and triple down on liberalism, albeit of the classical variety. And my argument has been no, no, no, we need to circumscribe. We need to suppress certain evil behaviors and disordered ideologies. We need to actually discourage those things because leftism is creating a lot of problems and we need to stop promoting it. We need to stop treating it neutrally or with a laissez faire hand. We need to suppress certain aberrant behaviors, like, for example, the weird gender sex stuff and certain evil ideologies like anarchism, like communism, the ideologies associated with antifa, we need to actively suppress them. We did that for much of American history. Then we stopped, Then we, I don't know. Then we started to worship at the idol of the invisible hand. But how many more times? How much more are we gonna deal with now? Gavin Newsom. Some of the Democrats are trying to distance themselves. Gavin Newsom tweets out. Today's arrest of a 29 year old Florida resident, Jonathan Rindernacht, marks an important step toward uncovering how the horrific Palisades fire began and bringing closure to the thousands of Californians whose lives were upended. You see this, you see this little sleight of hand here? He's a 29 year old Florida resident. Technically, that's true. What Gavin Newsom is not pointing out here is he was a California resident when he allegedly started the fires. What he's now pointing out is he fled to Florida after he committed his crime. He's trying to make him look like a Florida resident because Newsom's foil has been Ron DeSantis in Florida. Remember they had that debate, it was the undercard debate in the 2016 presidential election. There's the Florida way, that's the Republican way for the country in the states, and there's the Democrat way, the California way. They say, oh, he's a Florida resident. Trying to insinuate that the guy's a Republican because Florida is has switched from being a swing state into being a pretty solidly Republican state. But that isn't true. When the guy allegedly lit the fires, he was a Californian, he was one of Gavin Newsom's own constituents. Which just adds another layer to the political negligence of Gavin Newsom. He didn't deal with the brush, he didn't deal with the water, and he didn't deal with the homeless who do start a lot of fires. And he didn't deal with this lunatic failure after failure after failure. But they're doing nothing to fix it. They're doing absolutely nothing to fix it. And you're seeing this not just at the level of the office holders. You're seeing this throughout the left. The thinkers, such as they are the communicators, the streamers. You're just seeing this penchant for disorder and this creepy kind of violence all the way down to Hasan Piker. We'll get to him in one second. First, I want to tell you about Rabbit Air. Go to rabbit air.com. i love my Rabbit Air. I should say I love my rabbit heirs. I have one Rabbit A three that's in my. Where did I put it? I might have put it in my kids room. And then I have another Rabbit A three that is in my family room and that's even got a Mayflower logo on it. And it's phenomenal because it's specifically made. It's so good, it's so strong to even clear out cigar smoke, which if you don't have an air purifier, it really screws up your house. But if you do have it, it's fabulous. But because of that, because of how strong it is, it's just so great, even if you don't smoke, if you never smoke inside, it's so good. I've been using mine for years in the office here and it's sleek, it's quiet. You can set the timers and everything on the apps. It's got negative ions. It works especially if you have little kids, you have pets, you have. You have to get it. Rabbit air's award winning A3 purifier is six stage filtration. Advanced deodorization tackles anything you want. The cigar smoke, the odors, the pollutants. It has dual hive activated carbon filters that boost efficiency by 26%. It upgrades the single layer design with two offset layers. More carbon surface area, better air contact, stronger odor removal. It's just unbelievable, especially for the cigar guys, but for everybody else as well. Right now you, you need to upgrade your space. You go to rabbitaire.com or call them 247 to speak to a Rabbit Air consultant. I could not endorse this product more than I do. It is magnificent. Speaking of violent leftists, Hasan Piker, do you know him? He said, what is he? He's like 30 something streamer. He's a leftist. He is pretty popular. He just got in trouble, not for something he said ideologically, but because he apparently put a shock collar on his dog and then hours into one of his streams. The Dog decided to move and stretch his legs a little and he shocked the poor little dog underneath his desk.
B
I hate this country so much. You can be on a mountain in the middle of Norway and get better Internet than Los Angeles, California. And this is just like a moment of anger. This is a moment of anger for like something that is just so routine, so silly, such a first world problem. But it is emblematic of all of America's much more consequential violence. Ok? It's the same reason as to why America. Kaya, please just go, Just stop. Jesus Christ. What are you doing? You're being such a baby. It's just you're making her stressed. I, I, I, she just literally is, is so incredibly spoiled from my mom.
A
Okay, so for those of you who are only listening, he, the dog gets up to just move around a little bit. I guess the dog is used as a prop on his show. And then he reaches on his desk somewhere and as he reaches, he does something and then the dog yelps. And people have concluded, the sleuths online have concluded he's got a shock collar and he's torturing the poor dog for trying to get up during his hours and hours of blabbing. This guy, I've said it for years, this guy is the left. He is the young left in that way. I'm very grateful for him. He checks every single box. Callous as can be prone to violence, hates America. As he opens the first line of the video. Because I hate this country so much. This country is so terrible. It's the worst ever. And what's funny is he says, I can't even get good Internet in Los Angeles. To which I would say, you know, my Internet's pretty good in Tennessee. I don't know, maybe that's more of a LA problem. Of course his answer is, we need to make all of America like la. Well, now you're, I don't know, you're in the city that isn't functioning very well. My city's working really great. Anyway, people are horrified by this. They're not horrified by all the other things he's ever said. They're horrified that he would shock his little dog. They're wondering, could he possibly do this? He's supposed to be this compassionate, sympathetic left winger, bleeding heart. Is it possible that he would shock a dog? I remember after Charlie was assassinated, a clip of his started going viral again in which he said that he wanted the streets to run red and be soaked in the blood of capitalists. I think he would Shock a dog? Yeah. I think if you want the wholesale slaughter of half the country and you call for that publicly and you don't back down and you don't regret it, I think you would be willing to shock a little doggy. Yeah, I think you would. Now, some people don't. Actually, it is kind of funny. Cause people often point out that Hitler really loved dogs, you know, so sometimes there are and there are. I don't just mean to point to Hitler. I mean, like the whole animal welfare, PETA, environmentalist left. These are people who almost, to a man, support slaughtering babies and abortion. But, you know, if you don't put your little poodle in a stroller on the street so his little paws don't have to step on the curb, you know, you're a genocidal maniac. You're just awful. So these are. Yes, there are people who have really screwed up priorities and. And they love animals and hate people. I always say I'm a people person, but I wouldn't want to. I don't care for dogs, I don't care for cats. I don't really care for pets. I'm a people person. I don't want to torture them. I wouldn't put a shock collar on them and zap them every time. They don't act like props in the back of my show. And then what does he do? He immediately plays the victim, right? He zaps the poor little dog for getting up, allegedly. And then he says, why'd you make me do that, man? This is like a caricature out of a Lifetime movie. This is every Lifetime movie, right? A big evil guy comes in, like, viciously beats a woman. And then what does the abuser say? Why'd you make me do that? You just make me so angry. This is awful. I just hate how angry I am. And the reason I mention this is not merely to beat up on his son, Piker, who deserves it. And he obviously should be excluded from polite society. Not for the dog thing, but for all the comments about the people and he should not be platformed and all the rest of it. But he says something really interesting. He says, ah, so angry. I'm so angry. And it's just these little things. But it's emblematic of. I was like, yes, it is emblematic because it's emblematic of everything that's wrong with this country that sucks. But I think, no, no, all you're so close to. Your anger is emblematic of the left's broader resentment, pride, envy and wrath. And all the other deadly sins too. But your anger. It's not that you are angry because the dog getting up and stretching his legs is emblematic of all of the evils of this terrible country where the Internet supposedly doesn't work. It's that your anger is emblematic of a character flaw on the left. But it is representative. I don't have to recite the statistics, but they've been coming out over the past three weeks. The left is overwhelmingly much, much more likely to support political violence than the right is. Shockingly so. Eight times more among very, very liberal people compared to very conservative people. 30% almost of young liberals say political violence can be justified. They celebrated the murder of Charlie. Yeah. This is who they are. What do they say? They say, I want the streets to run red in the blood of my enemies. Stephen Bonnell, another libstreamer, he comes out, he says, republicans need to fear for their lives. They need to think they're gonna be murdered when they go to events. We need more of that. So, yeah, this is who they are. And so what are you gonna do? I guess the lesson we can learn from Hasan Piker here is maybe we need a little shock collar. You know, what's the just use of the shock collar? The just use of the shock collar is to train a dog who is misbehaving and get the dog to behave. What Hasan Piker has done that's wrong here is not use a shot collar. It's that he is punishing the dog for perfectly reasonable behaviors. The dog should be allowed to get up and move around. He's a dog. He doesn't need to be a prop in your show. If the dog were biting the neighbor, then you'd use the shock collar. If the dog were running away, if the dog were shooting people, if the dog were threatening political violence against an entire community, then you should shock the dog. That's what we need to do. Not through the use of private violence, but through the use of state power. These guys aren't getting any better. The assassination of Charlie was not this come to Jesus moment, like, literally. I wish it were a come to Jesus moment for them. For a lot of other people, it is, but for the left, it's not. They're doubling down. They're saying, yeah, we are gonna commit violence. And, yeah, you know, these guys did have it coming. Yeah, it's actually a good thing. Many of them were celebrating. And so if they're not gonna get any better, you have to create incentives for them to get better. And you need to punish them when they don't. And so in the case of someone like Hasan Piker, he should be excluded. He should be deplatformed. Conservatives who have any say in this should deplatform him. He should be kicked off Twitter. I don't know if he is on Twitter. He should be kicked off of Twitter. He should be kicked off of YouTube for the things that he has said. I know that the free speech absolutists aren't going to like that, but there are limits to free speech in the First Amendment, in the American political tradition, precisely because those limits are necessary to defend the free marketplace of ideas. And if you go out and you say, I want the streets to run red in the blood of conservatives simply for having their opinions, having a particular political view, you need to be excluded from the free marketplace of ideas. So we'll see. We gotta put the shock collar on Hasan, okay? Not literally. He would do it literally, probably to all of us and worse. But we need to put a political shock collar on the left or it's gonna get worse. It's gonna get a lot worse. And don't say you weren't warned, okay? Speaking of deranged California Democrats, Katie Porter, man, she's another one. She's emblematic. It's the word of the day. That's an emblem too. That's an emblematic jacket. Katie Porter is representative of her party. She is the perfect candidate for governor of California right now. She nearly stormed out an interview. She berated some poor journalist because she was so shocked at having been asked a question. We'll get to why. I can tell you exactly why that is. First though, I want to tell you about Shopify. Go to shopify.com knowles. Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world and 10% of all e commerce in the US we even use it for our own daily to make sure things are running smoothly and efficiency efficiently I should say, so that you can get the goods. Now you might be asking, what if I can't design a website? What if people haven't heard about my brand? No problem. Shopify's got you covered from the start with beautiful ready to go templates that match your brand style and helps you find customers through easy to run email and social media campaigns. Also, if you need a hand with everyday tasks, they're AI tools created specifically for commerce can help enhance product images, write descriptions and more. They're award winning customer Service and support available 24. 7. Turn your big business idea into With Shopify on your side, sign up for your $1 per month trial. Start selling today at shopify.com knowles k n a w l e s. That is shopify.com knowles I have started a number of businesses actually in my life. Had Shopify been around supporting me from those early days, man, oh, man, it would have gone better. Go to shopify.com knowles Today, folks, we have a new show. It's called Bar Fight. Check it out.
C
Trump is Putin's.
A
You are anti American. No, no, no, no, no, no. Let me talk. Most of the are asylum seekers or are they economic? Wait, no, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Let's go.
C
I want to help you get laid. Not me.
A
Are you pro incel. Well, welcome to Bar Fight. I'm Michael Knowles. I'm joined tonight by two guests. Wow. Real sophisticated answer. I know you would know him from CNN if anyone ever watched Adam Mugler. Well, dude, you got to answer my questions a little bit. Just because you're wrong about something doesn't mean it's not. That's convenient.
C
You know what? You should get out of my country.
A
They want more deep. I'm also joined one of the most reasonable people ever to appear on Jubilee. That would be Cecilia Ray. You can watch now the Michael Knowles YouTube channel and Daily Wire. Plus Katie Porter, Democrat, member of Congress running for governor of California. She sits down with CBS News. This is a broadcast news network. Generally liberal. I think they do a good job. I think they've been fair, especially recently, but they're a liberal network. She couldn't handle a question from a journalist at an historically liberal news network.
C
What do you say to the 40% of California voters who you'll need in order to win who voted for Trump?
D
How would I need them in order to win?
C
Well, unless you think you're gonna get 60% of the vote. You think you'll get 60. Everybody who did not vote for Trump will vote for you. That's what.
D
In a general election, yes. If it is me versus a Republican, I think that I will win the people who did not vote for Trump.
C
What if it's you versus another Democrat?
D
I don't intend that to be the case.
C
So how do you not intend that to be the case?
A
Do you.
C
Are you gonna ask them not to run?
D
No, I'm saying I'm gonna build the support. I have the support already in terms of name recognition. And so I'm gonna do the very best I can to make sure that we get through this primary in a really strong position. But let me be clear with you. I represented Orange County, I represented a purple area. I have stood on my own two feet and one Republican votes before. That's not something every candidate in this race can say. If you're from a deep blue area, if you're from LA or you're from Oakland, you haven't, you don't have an experience.
C
You just said you don't need those.
D
Trump voters, so you must be thinking them to win. You don't think this is unnecessarily argumentative? What is your question?
C
The question is the same thing I asked everybody, that this is being called the Empowering Voters to Stop Trump's power Grab. Every other candidate has answered this question. This is not.
D
I said I support it.
E
So.
C
And the question is, what do you say to the 40% of voters who voted for Trump?
D
Well, I'm happy to say that it's the, do you need them to win? Part that I don't understand. I'm happy to answer. Answer the question as you have it written and I'll answer it.
C
And we've also asked the other candidates, do you think you need any of those 40% of California voters to win? And you're saying, no, you don't.
D
No, I'm saying I'm going to try to win every vote I can. And what I'm saying to you is.
C
That, well, to those voters. Okay, so, so you.
D
I don't want to keep doing this. I'm going to call it. Thank you.
A
Okay, pause it, pause it. Okay, so crazy behavior from her. First of all, she clearly was prepped for certain questions, right? She says, well, ask the question as it's written and maybe I'll answer it. You ask the question as it's written, which the journalist did. That makes me wonder, I don't know this definitively. Did Katie Porter's team demand the questions ahead of time? Meaning, well, I'm not even gonna go into a CBS News interview without knowing the questions ahead of time. And then if the reporter deviated from the question by a word or two, or maybe not even just asked the question as it was with a follow up, she says, I gotta get outta here. But Katie Porter is mocking this question and she's so frustrated by this question. This is a very good question. She says, okay, it's a 60, 40 state. What are you gonna do about the 40%? Are you gonna try to win any of them over? She goes, I don't need them to win. 60% are Democrats. I'm gonna. But the point is, you can't just rely on all of Those people showing up. Any political campaign is gonna try to get support from the other side. There's always Democrats for Reagan, Democrats for Bush, Democrats for Trump. There's always that stuff. And on top of that, there is a possibility that there will be another Democrat in the race. So if there's another Democrat in the race now, you're really gonna need some Republican support. It's not like There are only 3% Republicans in California. There are a lot of Republicans. It's a Democrat state, but there are a lot of Republicans. And Katie Porter says, I don't need them. I don't need them, but I'm really good at winning their votes, but I don't wanna win their votes. So it's totally reasonable for the journalists to say, well, hold on, just what is your strategy? And even at the slightest pushback from a liberal news network, this woman says, I'm outta here, I'm done. I don't wanna do this anymore. Why? Because the Democrats are so unfamiliar with being challenged in any way for Republicans. We can go on the conservative news networks and sometimes we get pushback for the libs. They generally don't go on the conservative news networks. And they're used to getting softballs from all of the other liberal outlets, the newspapers and the websites and the podcasts and the TV networks. She's so prickly about it, she can't take the heat. This is one way in which being protected by a liberal network, not a TV network but a political network, being protected by this fortress of institutional liberalism can actually weaken you. Because when there are some chinks in the armor there, when some of the walls of the fort start coming down, when Republicans win the popular vote and the Congress and the Senate and have the Supreme Court and then start to wield power in a way that makes the liberal institutions come along a little bit more in big tech and in the media, then they're totally vulnerable. How's this woman going to be governor of California? She can't handle a question from a friendly news network. Keep going.
C
You're not going to do the interview with us?
A
Nope.
D
Not like this I'm not. Not with seven follow ups to every single question you ask.
C
Every other candidate has answered.
D
I don't care. I want to have a pleasant, positive conversation. Which you asked me about this list.
A
I wanna have a pleasant conversation. I'm running for governor because I wanna have a pleasant time. Why won't you let me have a nice time? You didn't even offer me an iced tea. You're running for you know you're running for governor. You're in politics, right. You know you're not. This is not a day at the spa, but she thinks it is. The entitlement from this woman is magnificent. But between her and Jay Jones, we'll get try to get to him a little bit later. He's the AG candidate in Virginia who fantasized about murdering a Republican and the Republicans kids. Yeah. Between these two, man, Democrats are gonna have a rough, a rough couple of years, aren't they? If these two are the face of the party and they're gonna have a rough couple of years because these two are not outliers. That's what the past three weeks have shown us. It's not just some fringe lunatic who supports political violence. It's the presumptive ag, Attorney general, top law enforcement official in Virginia. It's not just some crazy snowflake on a college campus with crazy hair who's entitled and bratty and can't answer a question and screams at people. It's the presumptive governor of the state of California. This is the Democrat party. This is so brutal to them because it's accurate.
D
Keep going on this list and if every question you're going to make up a follow up question, then we're never going to get there and we're just going to circle around.
A
Ever.
C
You've never had to have a conversation. Okay, but every other candidate has done this.
D
What part of I'm me, I'm running for governor because I'm a leader. So I am going to make.
C
So you're not going to answer questions from reporters. Okay, why don't we go through. I will continue to ask follow up questions because that's my job as a journalist. I will go through an essay. If you don't want to answer. So nearly every legislative.
D
I don't want to have an unhappy experience with you.
A
Put a pause. Just. I don't, I'm not gonna. If there are follow up questions, lady, look, I don't know. This investigative reporter CBS I find is relatively fair compared to the other networks, but it's a liberal network, okay? And even a hint of fairness and in this case, very, you know, serious professionalism. The reporter says, hey, you know, that's my job. What do you think that we're doing here? Oh, you thought I'm just a shill and a propagandist for you. I can't do that. I have to ask you at least some mild questions. And what does Katie Porter say? I don't wanna have an unhappy experience. I don't. This is like the grown up Greta Thunberg speech at the UN you have stolen my dreams. You. How dare you. This is it. This is the. I don't want to have an unhappy experience. I want a pleasant experience. Why are you. And it's a shock of betrayal is what it is. This is where I sympathize with Katie Porter. Katie Porter was raised in a political environment in which mainstream media journalists don't ask them questions. And if they ask them questions, it's what flavor ice cream do you like? And they don't ask follow ups. And now, because the political environment has changed and because Republicans have won a unified government, but not just that, because Republicans have basically, for the first time in my lifetime, actually wielded political power to bring real pressure on the left, not just in government, but in the cultural institutions. Trump has actually put pressure on Big Tech and on the media and, and he's revoked press passes and he's going after some of his political enemies who have broken the law because they're getting a little bit tough and they're dealing not just in wishy washy procedural norms of liberalism, but actual substantive goods. Katie Porter's got to answer a question. She says, that's not what I signed up for. I signed up. If you sign up to be a Republican politician, you're signing up to be murdered by the left. If you sign up to be a Democrat politician, you're signing up for a pleasant experience. Today is the Daily Wire plus series premiere of USS Al Qaeda Strike Before 9 11. The untold story of how 17American sailors were killed, dozens more wounded, and how Washington brushed it off as a criminal Act. Daily Wire plus members can watch the premiere of USS Al Qaeda strike before 9 11. Right now not a member get 40% off. A new Daily Wire plus annual membership with code fall40@dailywire.com My favorite comment yesterday is from alreadydead6539 who says the illegal immigrants have been dividing America more than any other time since the Civil War. Yes and no. The illegal aliens are the immediate cause, I guess, of the division, but they're not really the problem. They're a problem. I don't mean to downplay the issue of foreign nationals en masse coming into a country and not assimilating. But. But they're a symptom of a bigger problem. Cause they were let in by somebody. And the group that is really causing the division is not some Venezuelan peasant and it's not even the cartel member. It's not even the cartel member. It's the American leftist who lets them in, who so hates his country, who so neglects the common good and only cares about private interest that he would let those people in. That's the problem. That's much more conscious. That's a much more grievous sin. Okay, close me out on Katie Porter.
D
And I don't want this all on camera.
C
I don't want to have an unhappy experience with you either. I would love to continue to ask these questions so that we can show our viewers what every candidate feels about every one of these issues that they care about. And redistricting is a massive issue. We're going to do an entire story just on the responses to that question. And I've asked everybody the same follow up question.
A
This is amazing. She has like a, like a kindergarten teacher. I don't want to have an unhappy experience with you either, Sally, but you can't take all your clothes off in the middle of class and start, you know, throwing toys at the wall. You have to behave. You have to. You can't. That's not acceptable. Oh, I just don't want. I just wanna do it. Now we're getting some corroborating evidence here. The New York Post is reporting that Katie Porter's ex husband. This is according to court documents. Katie Porter's ex husband says that she once scalded him for with a pot of boiling potatoes. She's got a little bit of a temper issue. There's another video going around now. She's setting up a shot for some kind of meeting or TV news hit. And this is how she treats her staff.
D
State could lose. Get out of my shot.
C
I wanted to tell you that that's actually incorrect. It's not that it's electric vehicles. It's that if we don't meet the commitments under the prepare his climate accord.
D
Okay, it does. Okay. You also were in my shot before that. Stay out of my shot.
A
This makes Bill O'Reilly look like a Rastafarian man. You're in Bill O'Reilly effort. We'll do it live. That makes him seem like Bob Marley, man. Just, you know, it's all good, man. It's one love, it's all good. Screaming and why was the staff member in the shot, by the way? To correct something Katie Porter had said, trying to help Katie Porter just goes off. Can you imagine speaking to someone like that? Look, this is a real test of character and it's cliche. I'm certainly not the first to say it you can tell just about everything about a person's character by how they treat waiters. You can tell 20 seconds. An extension of that is you can tell everything about a person's character by how they treat their staff and their colleagues. And you can just tell. You need 10 seconds of data, and you can tell what kind of person this is. But then the piece de resistance, and then we'll move on, is when Katie Porter apparently defended pedophilia on C Span.
D
This allegation of groomer and pedophile. It is alleging that a person is criminal somehow, and engaged in criminal acts merely because of their identity, their sexual orientation, their gender identity.
A
Pedophilia is a sexual orientation and gender identity, according to Katie Porter. And we can't be so mean to them. Lgbtqp. I guess, once again, the reason this is so devastating to Democrats is not because she's some freak. She is a freak, but she's not unrepresentative of the rest of the freaks on the left. The left believes that the logical conclusion of the LGBT ideology about innate sexual desires and the impossibility of merely mental crimes, whatever you do in your own mind, it can't possibly be sinful or aberrant in any way. Love is love. Desires are natural. And the consequence of all of that is, well, yeah, if someone has some aberrant desire, even one as horrifying as pedophilia, you couldn't cast aspersions on that in itself. That's a person's identity. Maybe they can't act on it, but I don't know, in some cases, maybe they can. Some of these California Democrats. Let's not forget Scott Wiener. When he was state senator in California, his big political accomplishments were reducing punishments for pederasts for grown men who molest teen boys, and also for reducing the punishment for knowingly giving someone hiv. So, you know, these guys do have really, really freaky, consequential sexual legislation, but it's also just in the ideology. That's the logical conclusion. The side that's eight times as likely as the other side to support political violence is probably gonna be a little mean to the staff. Yeah, that's true. The side that believes that elections are only legitimate when they win. Yeah, they're gonna act a little entitled to journalists. When journalists ask anything at all. This is who they are. Katie Porter is who they are. We've seen that. We've seen that really clearly over the last three weeks. Why are they becoming so particularly irate now? They're lashing out because they're losing. They lost the government. They don't have a foothold really in the federal government. They're the minority even in the House of Representatives. So from that standpoint they could shut down the government temporarily, but otherwise they can't do anything. And they've lost 10% of the youth vote between 2020 and 2024. And they're losing black men and they're losing women, even young women, women under 40. And they're losing Hispanics and they're losing. Man, this is really bad for them. And they're not gonna go down without a fight. And when I say they're not gonna go down without a fight, I don't mean that they're gonna campaign harder. I mean they're going to try to kill you and there's gonna be more leftist violence and they're gonna defend antifa and they're gonna say that the streets should run red with the blood of their enemies. They won't even disavow the Attorney General candidate who calls for all of those things explicitly. Here's Tim Kaine, the former future second female President of the United States. Tim Kaine running away from reporters asked about Jay Jones in Virginia. Support Jay Jones. You do? What do you, do you think you should drop out of this race after those comments? I just answered your question. You have concerns about what you saw. Then he stops. Completely indefensible. I've known Jay Jones for 25 years and those comments are very much out of character for him. So if I put the comments which are clearly beyond the pale against knowing this guy for 25 years, I'm still a supporter of Jay Jones. What do you think about Republicans? Oh, brutal. You almost feel bad for Tim Kaine. I don't, but you almost do. Cuz he's walking, he's trying to avoid the question. I don't want to answer the question. Don't want to answer. And then what happens? It's just, he realizes it's just so bad and he turns, he says the comments are indefensible. I don't support murdering Republicans and their kids, but I do support it because I won't withdraw my endorsement of J. Jones. I support Jay Jones. You see this? So it's just words. Some Democrats, many Democrats won't even say that there's anything wrong with his words because many Democrats explicitly support political violence and, and agree with Jay Jones that you and your kids should be murdered. Some who have a little bit more political sense and maybe a conscience, but at least political sense they say, well, these comments are completely indefensible, but I'm still going to support J. Jones. So practically speaking, they're still supporting that. I've known him for 25 years. Those comments are out of character. No, maybe they're in character because he said it, apparently repeatedly. So there's no denying that is his character. And you have a choice. Are you gonna support that and you're gonna follow your party in this direction, or are you gonna stand up for what's right? And Tim Kaine, he says, yeah, nope, I'm with the guy who wants to murder the Republicans and their kids. Nancy Pelosi, cnn. Same thing.
E
A scandal over text messages in which he, the Democrat, said that the GOP speaker of the House of Delegates should get two bullets to the head for how he paid tribute to a former moderate Democratic lawmaker who died. He has apologized. Should he get out of the race?
D
Well, that's up to the people, the leaders in Virginia, they have said he has apologized. What I understand is they say that on balance, he's the better person to be Attorney General, but that's up to them. But I wish there would be enough fuss. Of all the times that people have said they were going to put a bullet in my head right in public. In the public.
A
So he said he wants to murder a Republican opponent and his children. And this is coming out after a leftist actually did murder the most prominent civil debater in the entire country and after my party justified, minimized and even celebrated it. But he's still not a Republican at least, so I have to support him. That's what she's saying. Better to have a Democrat who would murder half the country and their kids than any Republican. Well, he's the better candidate in the race. How's he the better candidate? Because he's got a D next to his name. So I support him. That's up to the people of Virginia, first of all. Kind of sort of. Not really. You get donations from outside the state. Many of Nancy Pelosi's colleagues who are not from Virginia are endorsing in this race. Cory Booker up in the Senate's endorsing Virginia. Is Virginia the same state as New Jersey? I don't think so. Yeah. And anyway, I just wanna talk about me. Why are we talking about the real left wing violence against Republicans that is actually happening when we could talk about imaginary right wing violence against me? Seriously? Yeah, but that's what they always do. This is the Seth Moulton response. Yeah, I know. With your eyes. You're Seeing all these leftists murdering Republicans and talking about how they want to murder Republicans and celebrating the murder of Republicans, but really secretly, super duper secretly. Most of the political violence is from the right. Can you show your dad on that? No, no thanks. No, we're good. But just trust me. Trust me, bro. I want to talk about me. I want to final point on this. CNN's Aaron Burnett has just come out and not merely defended Jay Jones or Tim Kaine or Nancy Pelosi has come out on CNN and defended Antifa.
E
And Trump's Secretary of Homeland Security actually took that further.
C
This network of Antifa is just as sophisticated as Ms. 13, as TDA, as.
A
ISIS, as Hezbollah, as Hamas, as all of them.
C
They are just as dangerous.
E
That's pretty incredible, right? Hamas has just been engaged in a two year war that we just announced the first stage of a peace plan to a few moments ago. And isis. These are incredible things to say and obviously I'm not going to sit here and defend anybody who considers themselves part of an antifa movement. Such that it is, but such that it is is the operative part of that sentence. Antifa is far from a major sophisticated terror organization like Hezbollah, Hamas or isis. In fact, it's not even like far right groups like the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers which have had national leaders. Unlike Antifa, there is no organized hierarchy to the group. And according to the center for Strategic and International Studies, compared to right wing extremists, Antifa linked violence is rare and limited.
A
Yeah, according to Antifa.com, antifa doesn't commit any crimes. Yeah, so actually it's not a big deal. First of all, to her point, she says Antifa. Oh, Antifa. You can't compare Antifa to Hamas and Hezbollah and isis. Yeah, I guess you're right. That's true. Antifa is a much greater danger to Americans than Hamas and Hezbollah and isis. A much greater danger. It's not even close because Hamas and Hezbollah and isis, all very bad guys. Our civilization, we've been fighting jihadis for a long time, about 1400 years now. But generally speaking, when they threaten Americans, it's in the Middle East. They threaten us here on the homeland sometimes, no doubt about it, but not a lot. Antifa is here. And while ISIS threatens the United States, as any geopolitical adversary might, Antifa threatens our whole political order. Antifa threatens to bring about not merely a war against the United States. Nations fight wars, but a civil war. Antifa they don't. They're barely even an organization. There's no unity to antifa. I mean, yeah, they have uniforms and flags and a common name and a common set of beliefs. And they meet up in cells, often in bookshops, and they carry out fairly sophisticated acts of terror regularly. But they're not like a real thing like the Proud Boys, you know, when, like, Gavin McGinnis would hang out with dudes and tell jokes and wave American flags. That was a much greater threat to America than the antifa militants who constantly set off bombs, shoot people, threaten to murder us, and are defended by cnn. Frankly, this has been going on even since before antifa became a cohesive brand identity, which was after the Second World War, but going back to 1919, 1920, you had anarchist and communist bombings in America from the radical left against immigration restrictionists and law enforcement and business leaders. Sound familiar? All the way up through 60s, 70s, 80s, all the way up to the present, defending antifa. So this is the problem. This is the point I made yesterday on the show. I wish we could. Kumbaya, man. You know, I'm all for civil discussion. I love. I just went on Adam Friedland's show. He's a left winger, very funny guy. I had a great time on his show. We had a good time. It's on his YouTube channel somewhere. I'm all for hanging out with the libs and trying to talk it out and being tough, but not being civilized. I'm all for it. I wish we could do that. We can. You can. In certain isolated instances. This guy can go on this guy's show. We can have this debate with this person. But for the political order, if you have very prominent voices and institutions, as in the case of cnn, defending domestic terrorism, defending the murder of half the country, if you have the top law enforcement official in Virginia doing that with the entire Democratic party behind him, he doesn't lose a single endorsement. When you have that kind of situation, there's no kumbaya. There's no possibility your opponent has a say. And so there are two options. There's more private violence, which is what the left is giving us and which is, generally speaking, unjust. Or there's state violence. And the state violence is the civil authority coming in and arresting the bad guys and suppressing them, and in some cases, the civil institutions deplatforming people and circumscribing what can be said and argued in a just and prudent way. Those are your options. There's so much more I want to get to. The United States is deporting people to Eswatini. But I can't get to that today. Eswatini is your tease until tomorrow because I have a great guest coming out on the member blog. The show continues now, you do not want to miss it. Become a member. Use code Knowles Canada wles at checkout for 2 months free on all annual plans SA.
Date: October 9, 2025
Host: Michael Knowles (The Daily Wire)
In this politically charged episode, Michael Knowles examines explosive new claims that a major Los Angeles wildfire may have been intentionally started by a left-wing activist, challenging widespread narratives around climate, mismanagement, and political violence. From there, Knowles launches a broad critique of what he describes as a pattern of left-wing disorder, defending suppression of “evil ideologies” and discussing recent controversies involving Democratic politicians and media figures. He also explores media complicity, the normalization of political violence, and Democratic discomfort with journalistic scrutiny.
“The FBI is upending both of those narratives and saying, no, no, no. The fires were started intentionally by an apparent left winger.”
— Michael Knowles ([05:05])
“Those two events might not be connected...But again, we're seeing left wing people introducing lots of disorder into society.”
— Knowles ([07:40])
“Leftism is creating a lot of problems...and we need to stop treating it neutrally or with a laissez faire hand. We need to suppress certain aberrant behaviors...and certain evil ideologies like anarchism, like communism, the ideologies associated with Antifa.”
— Knowles ([09:12])
“He's trying to make him look like a Florida resident because Newsom's foil has been Ron DeSantis in Florida...But that isn’t true. When the guy allegedly lit the fires, he was a Californian, he was one of Gavin Newsom's own constituents.”
— Knowles ([11:12])
“He wanted the streets to run red and be soaked in the blood of capitalists. I think he would shock a dog? Yeah. I think if you want the wholesale slaughter of half the country... you would be willing to shock a little doggy.”
— Knowles ([15:12])
“The left is overwhelmingly much, much more likely to support political violence than the right is. Shockingly so. Eight times more among very, very liberal people compared to very conservative people. Thirty percent almost of young liberals say political violence can be justified.”
— Knowles ([18:45])
“We need to put a political shock collar on the left or it's gonna get worse. It's gonna get a lot worse. And don't say you weren't warned, okay?”
— Knowles ([21:28])
Context: Katie Porter, California Democratic congresswoman and gubernatorial candidate, is interviewed by CBS and becomes visibly frustrated when pressed about appealing to Trump voters ([23:57–30:00]).
Knowles’ Take:
“This is not a day at the spa, but she thinks it is. The entitlement from this woman is magnificent.”
— Knowles ([28:22])
“Pleasant experience” motif:
"I want to have a pleasant, positive conversation."
— Katie Porter ([28:17])
"I don't want to have an unhappy experience with you."
— Porter ([30:12])
“Completely indefensible. I've known Jay Jones for 25 years and those comments are very much out of character for him. So if I put the comments which are clearly beyond the pale against knowing this guy for 25 years, I'm still a supporter of Jay Jones.”
— Knowles summarizing Kaine ([40:57]) “He has apologized. Should he get out of the race? Well, that's up to the people, the leaders in Virginia.”
— Pelosi ([41:41])
Critiques CNN’s Erin Burnett, who pushes back against characterizing Antifa as a major terror threat:
“Antifa is far from a major sophisticated terror organization like Hezbollah, Hamas or ISIS… According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, compared to right wing extremists, Antifa-linked violence is rare and limited.”
— Erin Burnett ([44:30])
“Antifa is a much greater danger to Americans than Hamas and Hezbollah and ISIS… Antifa threatens our whole political order… Antifa [is] here.”
— Knowles ([44:55])
Argues, using historical context, that left-wing political violence is a recurring fixture in American history (references 1919/1920 bombings, the '60s, etc.).
“There’s no possibility your opponent has a say. And so there are two options: there’s more private violence, which is what the left is giving us and … is unjust. Or there's state violence. And the state violence is the civil authority coming in and arresting the bad guys and suppressing them, and in some cases, the … deplatforming people and circumscribing what can be said and argued in a just and prudent way.”
— Knowles ([45:10])
On Arson Suspect and Leftist Violence:
“This weirdo firebug. ... if the facts ... are accurate, then the LA fire [was] started because of a disturbed leftist. And at a certain point you just have to ask how much more of this are we going to tolerate?”
— Knowles ([08:58])
On Free Speech & Extremism:
“If you go out and you say, I want the streets to run red in the blood of conservatives... you need to be excluded from the free marketplace of ideas.”
— Knowles ([21:15])
On Katie Porter's Media Frustrations:
“I want to have a pleasant experience. ... I'm running for governor because I want to have a pleasant time. Why won't you let me have a nice time?”
— Knowles ([28:22])
On Antifa's Danger:
“Antifa is a much greater danger to Americans than Hamas and Hezbollah and ISIS. ... Antifa threatens our whole political order.”
— Knowles ([44:55])
| Timestamp | Segment/Topic | |--------------|---------------------------------------------------------------| | 00:00–03:00 | Introduction; Jean jacket banter, segue to LA arson claims | | 05:00–11:30 | Details of Palisades Fire, FBI reports, suspect's background | | 12:32–15:00 | Hasan Piker dog incident and general reflections on leftist violence | | 18:00–21:00 | Statistics about left vs right support for political violence | | 21:00–22:30 | Knowles calls for suppression/deplatforming of radicals | | 23:57–30:00 | Katie Porter CBS interview, Porter's responses and walk-out | | 30:12–35:15 | Porter's further pushback, video of mistreatment of staff, personal temperament stories | | 36:19–37:00 | Porter's remarks on pedophilia and Knowles’ critique on LGBT ideology| | 40:57–42:03 | Kaine and Pelosi address Jay Jones's violent rhetoric | | 44:00–45:10 | CNN's defense of Antifa and Knowles’ condemnation |
Michael Knowles’s episode builds a “case” against contemporary left-wing politics by interweaving breaking news (the LA fire arson suspect), cultural commentary (media reactions, influencer scandals), and political analysis (Porter, Jones, institutional responses). His tone is acerbic, at times satirical, unapologetically partisan, and notably focused on calls for using social and state power to “suppress” harmful ideologies. He frames recent incidents not as outliers but as representative of a deeper pattern—one he believes demands urgent, robust opposition.
“This is who they are. Katie Porter is who they are. We've seen that. We've seen that really clearly over the last three weeks.”
— Michael Knowles ([37:15])
Note: Ads, product plugs, and non-content banter have been excluded as per instructions.