Ep. 1913 - Horrifying Updates: Trans Father Confirmed In Hockey Rink Massacre

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Michael Knowles Show

Episode 1913 – Horrifying Updates: Trans Father Confirmed In Hockey Rink Massacre
Date: February 17, 2026
Host: Michael Knowles (The Daily Wire)

---

Overview

In this episode, Michael Knowles delivers his pointed conservative take on current political and cultural events. The episode opens with an analysis of a tragic mass shooting by a trans-identifying individual at a hockey rink, using the case to argue about mental health, violence, and transgender ideology. Knowles continues with criticism of Democrats over accusations of “white nationalism,” a discussion about U.S. demographic changes and “Great Replacement Theory,” and a review of political speeches from the Munich Security Conference, contrasting speeches by Republicans Marco Rubio and J.D. Vance with a reportedly poor showing by AOC. He wraps up with a commentary on Barack Obama’s claim that “aliens are real.” The episode maintains Knowles’ trademark sardonic, direct tone and is highly critical of progressive policies and figures.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Rhode Island Hockey Rink Massacre and Transgender Violence

[03:23-10:00]

• A mass shooting occurred at a high school hockey game in Rhode Island, perpetrated by a trans-identifying man ("Robert, now Roberta"), who killed and wounded members of his own family before committing suicide.
• Knowles claims the details match “every stereotype” of trans-identifying individuals—citing suicidal, homicidal tendencies, family problems, and targeting of schools.
• He references social media comments by the shooter and discusses the ex-wife’s prior concerns about mental illness—especially traits Knowles attributes to “the trans phenomenon” such as narcissism and personality disorders.
• Knowles asserts that mental health discourse is undermined by political unwillingness to address transgender identity as the root problem:
  • Quote: “The mental problem is the trans identity. That’s the problem, right? Can we admit that now?” (06:55)
• He contends that not only does transgenderism fail to ease mental health struggles, but it worsens them and threatens communal safety:
  • Quote: “Their suicide rates are multiples and orders of magnitude higher than the general population. ... transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely. ... If you don’t agree with that, then you want these shootings to keep happening.” (10:00)
• Knowles draws a direct line from this incident to previous violence, further arguing for societal pushback against the “ideology.”

---

2. State Department Nominee Jeremy Carl Accused of “White Nationalism”

[10:00–14:00]

• Top Democrats, including Sens. Chris Murphy and Cory Booker, challenge Jeremy Carl, a Trump State Department nominee, over his public positions on race and immigration.
• Carl affirms his view that “white Americans are often very disfavored in overt ways” by current legal structures:
  • Quote – Jeremy Carl: “White Americans are often very disfavored in overt ways. We’re seeing this in the Small Business Administration, many other places.” (10:38)
• Knowles asserts it’s now “culturally approved and legally encouraged” to discriminate against white people, specifically through DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) initiatives and affirmative action.
• He claims Asians succeeded in the fight against affirmative action only because of their ability to claim discrimination—arguing anti-white discrimination was otherwise normalized:
  • Quote: “The whole point of affirmative action is to reduce the number of white people, the proportion of white people in various fields.” (12:03)
• When Carl references “Great Replacement Theory,” Cory Booker tries to frame Carl’s concern as anti-minority and racist, but Knowles says this is deliberate misrepresentation:
  • Quote: “So you are saying… that somehow weakens America because it puts whites in a minority.” (Booker paraphrased at 14:02)
  • Knowles argues Democrats celebrate demographic shifts when convenient but deny the intent when challenged.

---

3. DEI vs. Great Replacement Theory – Double Standards in Language

[14:00–16:00]

• Knowles draws a parallel between DEI programs and so-called “Great Replacement Theory”—arguing both, at their core, mean reducing the white proportion of any given population, with only a “difference of connotation.”
  • Quote: “DEI is a noble project to reduce the white proportion… and Great Replacement Theory is the evil, vile, obviously false conspiracy theory that there is a project to reduce the proportion of white people.” (15:30)
• He contends this rhetorical trick is typical of contemporary Democrat arguments, “pretending not to understand things, making communication impossible.”

---

4. Munich Security Conference: Rubio vs. AOC

[22:00–38:00]

Republican Speeches: Unity and Civilizational Vision

Rubio’s Speech [22:16–23:16, 26:55–27:50]

• Rubio, as Secretary of State, delivers a speech on Western civilization, shared ancestry, and the tangible interests nations defend—not mere abstractions.
  • Quote: “We are part of one civilization, Western civilization. We are bound to one another by the deepest bonds that nations could share, forged by centuries of shared history, Christian faith, culture, heritage, language, ancestry…” (22:36)
  • “Armies do not fight for abstractions. Armies fight for a people. Armies fight for a nation. Armies fight for a way of life.” (23:11)
• Knowles praises the unity and complementarity between Rubio’s and J.D. Vance’s speeches, representing a new Trump-era Republican vision for defending "a people and a way of life," not just liberal international institutions.
• Rubio explicitly criticizes the UN's ineffectiveness and positions American leadership as central to global peace:
  • Quote: “It was American leadership that freed captives from barbarians and brought about a fragile truce. … It was powerless to constrain the nuclear program of radical Shia clerics in Tehran. That required 14 bombs… And it was unable to address the threat to our security from a narco terrorist dictator in Venezuela. Instead, it took American special forces.” (27:00)

AOC’s Struggles at MSC [31:38–38:07]

• AOC is characterized as lost and flustered when asked basic questions on foreign policy, particularly Taiwan:
  • Quote – AOC: “You know, I think that this is such a, you know, I think that this is a, this is of course, a very long standing policy of the United States. And I think what we are hoping for is that we want to make sure that we never get to that point…” (31:46–32:26)
• Knowles criticizes her hesitation and lack of substantive answers, saying she “doesn't know anything” and is “not ready for primetime.”
• He recounts how AOC attempted to pitch a “class-based internationalist perspective”—which Knowles translates directly as “communism.”
  • Quote – AOC: “When we talk about a class-based internationalist perspective, [it] also means ending the hypocrisy towards the global South.” (37:40)
  • Knowles quips: “Class based internationalism is communism.” (38:07)
• Knowles contrasts Rubio’s thoughtful speech about “material interests within a culture” with AOC’s reliance on slogans and buzzwords, suggesting a lack of depth.

---

5. Barack Obama on Aliens – Liberalism and Human Specialness

[40:10–44:00]

• Barack Obama, in an interview with Brian Tyler Cohen, jokingly asserts that aliens are real.
  • Quote – Obama paraphrased: “Aliens are real, but I haven’t seen them. They’re not being kept in Area 51 ... unless there’s this enormous conspiracy and they hid it from the President.” (Post-44:00)
• Knowles critiques liberals’ fascination with alien life, arguing it stems from a desire to deny human uniqueness and, in his view, to diminish the Incarnation (Christian theological doctrine):
  • Quote: “The reason that the libs always promote aliens is because it diminishes the incarnation, because Christ is a man, because God becomes a man, he doesn’t become ET...” (44:47)
• He posits that this impulse reflects broader liberal tendencies toward self-abasement and rejection of human dignity.

---

Notable Quotes & Moments (with Timestamps)

• On Transgender Violence:
  • “Can we admit that now? ... The mental health problem they have is they think they’re the opposite sex. And that goes along with extreme narcissism, violence, violent tendencies, and suicidality. Like every time…” (06:55–07:33)
  • “Transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely. The whole preposterous ideology at every level.” (10:00)
• On Discrimination and "Great Replacement Theory":
  • “Does anybody seriously disagree with that? ... White people are the only group that face discrimination that is approved culturally and that is legally sanctioned.” (10:51, 12:00)
  • “DEI very clearly is this wonderful, wonderful project to ... reduce the proportion of the white population in any given society. And the Great Replacement Theory is the evil, awful ... conspiracy theory that there is a political project to reduce the proportion of white people…” (15:30)
• On Rubio’s Munich Security Conference Speech:
  • “Armies do not fight for abstractions. Armies fight for a people. Armies fight for a nation. Armies fight for a way of life.” (23:11)
  • “It was American leadership that freed captives from barbarians…” (27:00)
• On AOC’s “Communism” Pitch:
  • “Class based internationalism is communism.” (38:07)
• On Obama’s Aliens Declaration:
  • “Are aliens real? Yes, they’re real.” (Obama paraphrased)
  • “The reason that the libs always promote aliens is because it diminishes the incarnation ... and the libs and demons want to diminish that.” (44:47)

---

Segment Timestamps

• [03:23] – Detailed recap and commentary on the Rhode Island transgender mass shooting
• [10:18–13:22] – Senate hearing audio: Jeremy Carl grilled on white discrimination and “Great Replacement Theory”
• [14:00–16:00] – Knowles’ commentary on DEI vs. Great Replacement Theory: “difference of connotation”
• [22:16–27:51] – Marco Rubio’s Munich Security Conference speech and analysis
• [31:38–38:07] – AOC’s stammering at MSC and Knowles’s breakdown of her “communism” pitch
• [44:00] – Obama’s interview with Brian Tyler Cohen: “aliens are real”
• [53:03+] – Promotional content, sponsored segues, and ad reads (omitted from summary)

---

Summary Flow

• The episode moves from a national news incident (trans mass shooting) to the political and ideological, linking individual and societal outcomes to policy and cultural trends.
• It dissects the language used by the political left to frame debates about race, inclusion, and demographics, accusing them of intentional rhetorical dishonesty.
• Contrasting styles and substance are examined in American political leadership (Rubio/Vance vs. AOC), illustrating Knowles’ view of a coherent “MAGA” right versus a confused and ideologically rigid left.
• The show closes with a philosophical rumination on liberalism’s tendency to undermine human distinctiveness, using Obama’s “aliens” remarks as a jumping-off point.

---

Tone & Language

• Highly critical, polemical, and at times mocking toward progressive figures and policies.
• Frequent digressions to broader culture-war themes (masculinity, faith, civilization), interweaving political analysis with cultural critique.
• Uses clear, punchy rhetorical questions and assertions; pulls no punches in expressing conclusions.

---

For Listeners

This episode provides a sharp, hardline conservative critique of modern progressive approaches to gender, race, immigration, and national identity, blending direct policy commentary with sweeping cultural argument. Expect rapid transitions between news, political theory, and Knowles’ wider assessments of the American right versus left, delivered with his characteristic bite.

Transcript

[Michael Knowles]

This episode is brought to you by Good Ranchers, which I had for dinner last night. I had their new filet mignon and it was absolutely magnificent. I had more than one of them support the American farmers and ranchers who fed this country for 250amazing years. [e-mail], use code knowleskennet wles get an additional 25 bucks off your first order of 100% American delicious meat delivered right to your door. Top Democrats are assailing one of President Trump's State Department nominees as a quote unquote legit white nationalist because the nominee described the Democrats immigration policies back to them. Then AOC tries to sell communism at the Munich Security Conference and Barack Obama says aliens are real, which is the clearest evidence yet that aliens are not in fact real. I'm Michael Knowles, this is the Michael Knowles Show. Welcome back to the show. Huge story coming out of Big Tech that virtually nobody is talking about that could seriously affect the midterms and even the 2028 presidential election. I don't know how this has not gotten wider penetration yet, but this is the biggest election story going on and we have Dr. Robert Epstein coming on to tell us about it. First, I want to tell you about Cowboy colostrum. Go to cowboycollastrum.com knowles if you want to fix your gut, make your hair healthier and stronger and add some glow to your skin. This year you need to add Colostrum to your daily routine. Our sponsor Cowboy Colostrum offers the highest quality bovine colostrum available in the US made entirely in America from 100% grass fed American cows. What sets Cowboy apart from the other brands is that it is true. First day, whole Colostrum packed with bioactives like immunoglobulins and and growth factors, do not worry, they only collect the surplus after baby calves have had their fill. I kid you not. I was explaining to my in laws over the weekend while I was eating veal piccata. No veal saltimboca. Excuse me, much better veal dish. I'm sitting there eating the veal. I said yep, I've got this great sponsor, Cowboy Colostrum. But they use calf first sourcing so they make sure the calves get all that tasty. Colostrum. Mm yum. More veal please. Anyway, Cowboy Colostrum is terrific. They had great flavors. Chocolate, Madagascar, vanilla, strawberry. For a limited time, our listeners get up to 25% off their entire order. Go to cowboycollastroom.com knowles use code knowles at checkout 25% off when you use code knowles10W L E [e-mail] knowles so much to get to even a relatively breaking story last night amid everything going on the Munich security conference, aliens, massive national debate over white nationalism. Another story. Heard this song before. A trans identifying guy shot up a school hockey game last night in Rhode Island. This story, it comes from a guy named Robert who now goes by Roberta. I just. Here are the bullet points. Transgender dad shoots up a high school hockey game. He then killed himself after opening fire at the Pawtucket ice rink. So right now just check, check, check on every stereotype of the trans identifying people. Suicidal, homicidal, major family problems, target schools. He had responded, I think to Kevin Sorbo once actually on X, said keep bashing us because Kevin Sorbo, the conservative actor said that transgenderism isn't real. This guy responded a while ago, said keep bashing us, us, but do not wonder why we go berserk. So guy says he's a girl, targets a school, targets his family. Homicidal, suicidal, lots of warning, totally predictable. This is every trans violence story you've ever heard to a T. The victims include the mother of one of the student hockey players, of the mother of the son of this trans guy and the athlete's sibling. I don't think the son actually was killed, but the sibling at least was killed. It's not clear to reporters. I'm reading this from the New York Post. If the mom who was gunned down is the ex wife of the trans guy, his ex wife filed for divorce in 2020 on the grounds of gender reassignment surgery and narcissistic plus personality disorder traits. Again, right out of every trans story, right out of the textbook. The trans phenomenon associated with extreme narcissism, extreme personality disorders. The gunman's daughter has told reporters he quote, has mental health issues and was very sick. He shot my family and he's dead. Now the guy has mental health problems. Gee, you don't say. Of course he does. Now here's the question for all of the libs and all the people who are open minded, so open minded that their brains fall out on the trans issue. What are his mental problems? What are they? Did he just have a little ocd? Did he just have a touch of depression? What are the mental problems? The mental problem is the trans identity. That's the problem, right? Can we admit that now? You were previously not allowed to admit that and you would be kicked off of social media for saying that and you would be Calumniated in the national press, in my case, when I gave a speech on the transgender issue some years ago. Can we admit that, though? What's the mental health problem? We always say we have a mental health crisis in this country. We need to have a serious conversation about mental health. You know, rather than just target these poor trans people, we need to talk about mental health. That's what we're trying to do. That's what we're trying to talk about. Because the mental health problem they have is they think they're the opposite sex. And that goes along with extreme narcissism, violence, violent tendencies, and suicidality. Like every time, every time, a disproportionate, massively disproportionate number of these shooters, the school shooters, the family shooters, are trans identified. Their suicide rates are multiples and orders of magnitude higher than the general population. So that's the mental health problem. Right. So we should treat that problem, right? No, we're not allowed to. We say out of one side of our mouths, this is a very serious mental health issue. And then out of the other side, we say, and we're not gonna do anything about it. So they keep shooting people, they keep shooting kids, they keep targeting school children, they keep shooting their wives. Final part of the story, the ice rink slaughter. The New York Post came just days after 18 year old transgender high school dropout murdered his own mom and stepbrother before gunning down six others at his former school in Canada. If we have time, we'll get to some of the fallout from that shooting as well. Another day, another transvestite shooting people and himself. Yes, and the part that is so infuriating about the whole story, it's not even just the tragedy. It's a fallen world and sad things happen and the rain falls on the just and the unjust alike. The thing that is infuriating about this story is it's entirely predictable. And major national politicians, the Democrats, defend this. They affirm this. He says, you keep bashing us, and then you wonder why we go berserk. We're not bashing you. You are berserk. You're a berserk person. If you think you're the opposite sex, you're berserk. And you have a lot of berserk personality traits. And what you are perceiving as us bashing you is us trying to help you and us pointing out the obvious, which is that you are berserk. And then the way that you're going to get back at us is by proving Us entirely. Right? Every time. Every time. On top of that, the largest data set on this issue has shown that the transgender procedures, surgical, hormonal, even social, they don't help. They don't help at all. They don't mitigate the depression, they don't mitigate the anxiety. They actually make the anxiety worse and they don't mitigate the suicidality. And if it were just a problem afflicting you, I would still care about it. I would still. Cause I'm not some libertarian, I would still try to help you. Cause we all live in society and there are standards and norms in society. But. But the reality is it's affecting everybody. You're taking away bathrooms from women, you're taking away sports from women. You're creating a lot of disorder and scandal on the street. Oh, yeah, and you keep slaughtering people. Kids. You keep targeting kids. So that's that. For the good of society and especially for the good of the poor people who are in the throes of this confusion, transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely. The whole preposterous ideology at every level. If you agree with that, you're taking one step towards solving the problem. If you don't agree with that, then you want these shootings to keep happening. Okay, moving on from the trannies for now, we turn to Capitol Hill and a top State Department nominee. This is Jeremy Carl. Very qualified State Department nominee, strong academic background, has written a lot, thought a lot about this. Good pick for the job. The Democrats, though, they wanna boot him. And they wanna boot him because apparently Jeremy Carl is a white nationalist. What does white nationalism even mean? I don't know. Let's try to find out. Here is Democrat Chris Murphy one of the most insufferable. Would you say most insufferable or least sufferable? Regardless, he's one of the absolute worst Democrats on Capitol Hill. He's from Connecticut. Here he is grilling President Trump's State Department nominee over claims of anti white discrimination. A year ago, were white Americans the most discriminated against group in the United States? You said it.

[Jeremy Carl]

Yes, Senator, certainly this is my belief. I'm not running away from that. I think that while of course, all races in different contexts can be subject to really severe discrimination, that when we look at our legal structures, white Americans are often very disfavored and overt ways. We're seeing this in the Small Business Administration, many other places.

[Michael Knowles]

So your belief is that white Americans face more discrimination, at least prior to the Trump administration fixing this, than black.

[Jeremy Carl]

Americans on Average Senator? Yes, that's correct. And I'm not running away from that statement at all.

[Michael Knowles]

Does anybody seriously disagree with that? Jeremy Carl's very well articulated point is he said, yes, anybody can face unjust discrimination, but white people are the only group that face discrimination, that is approved culturally and that is legally sanctioned. Until very recently. Maybe you have a few cases on affirmative action that start to move the ball in the other direction. But even in those cases, after the Supreme Court struck down affirmative action in college admissions, the colleges all just said, okay, well, we'll abide by the court's ruling, wink, wink, and they're going to figure out other ways to get around it. Does anybody seriously disagree with that? If you do not hire a black person, if you don't admit a black person to your college, you will face an onslaught, not just of civil cases, you'll face civil rights investigations if you exclude a white person. You are applauded for your great efforts to diversify and to include and to promote equity. In fact, the only reason that the Supreme Court struck down affirmative action in college admissions is because the Asians were able to claim discrimination as well. Had it just been white people, they would have let it go. Because the whole point of affirmative action is to reduce the number of white people, the proportion of white people in various fields. That's why it was the Asians who had to lead the fight against affirmative action. But can you name another group that is discriminated against de facto? Maybe. Yeah, maybe. Depends on the situation. Maybe you can name a group that's discriminated against. As a matter of fact, can you name another group where discrimination against that group is culturally approved? Yeah, that's. We need to abolish whiteness. We need more diversity. We need. No, the stupid white people. Those dumb white Karens. Can you name another one? I can't. Where that's approved by our mainstream institutions, by our elites in media, in politics and elsewhere. And then furthermore, can you name another group where it is not only culturally approved, but legal and legally encouraged to discriminate against that group? Can you? No, it's white people. So as far as the racial groups go, white people are in fact more discriminated against than the other groups. Jeremy Carl, 100% right. Chris Murphy goes down swinging on that one. How about Cory Booker? Cory Booker comes up. He is absolutely shocked that Jeremy Carl would promote the Great Replacement Theory.

[Jeremy Carl]

What do you mean when you say that you believe in the Great Replacement Theory? Senator? Thank you for that question. This refers to the intentional demographic replacement of Europeans in Europe. It was invented by Renaud Camus, who was a French scholar. You think there's an active effort to, quote, unquote, replace Americans right now, Senator, I think the Democratic party, through its immigration policies has certainly shown signs of that. And I don't understand that. So you are saying, you know, I don't understand that really more Americans are black or Latino Americans, that that somehow weakens America because it puts whites in a minority.

[Michael Knowles]

Hold on. So Cory Booker, you notice he changes it there at the end. At first he says, you think that there is a major demographic shift afoot. And Jeremy girl says, yeah, what are. Yeah, in 1964, white people were 90% of the United States. Now they're a little under 60%, depending on how you count it. So there's been this massive shift because of the Hart Celler act, which specifically endeavored to reduce the white proportion of the population and bring in non white peoples. So you might think that's a good thing. And actually you guys do think it's a good thing. You always talk about how it's a good thing. You've written very prominent political science papers about this. You've talked about the coalition of the ascendant. You've bragged about this when you're celebrating it, but then you deny it when we object to it. There's a meme going around social media, which is that so much of Democrat political discourse is just pretending not to understand things, thus making communication impossible. And so Cory Booker, he's pretending not to understand this. Oh, you're telling me there's a mass migration campaign to change the demographics of America? What? It's the first I'm hearing of this. Stop the presses. What? But then when Jeremy Carl says, yeah, that's obviously happening, he goes, so you're telling me that's a bad thing? That brown people make America weaker? Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Jeremy Carl never said that. Senator, where'd you get that from? Seems to me you are confessing some prejudice of your own. Seems to me you're changing the argument here, cuz you know, you can't win on the first point. Obviously there is a major political project for a demographic shift. Let me ask you something real quick, real quick here. Can you define DEI for me? What is dei? I know it stands for diversity, equity, inclusion, but what does it do? What is the definition of dei? What is it? I think the most clinical, neutral definition we could have of DEI is, as the promoters of DEI would put it, that it is a noble political project to Reduce the white proportion of the population in any given society. That's what diversify means, diversity. We've too many white people in boardrooms, in universities in the United States. And so we need to diversify. That is, we need more non white people relative to the white people. Which means if you're gonna have more non white people, you have to have relatively fewer white people. Right? That's what that means. And when people promote dei, they're saying, this is a noble, good political project in order to reduce the proportion of the white population in any given society. Okay? Now can you please define for me the Great Replacement Theory? What is the Great Replacement Theory? As I understand it, reading Wikipedia, listening to these bloviating Democrat senators, the Great Replacement Theory is the evil, vile, obviously false conspiracy theory that there is a political project to reduce the proportion of white people in a given society. Do I have that right? DEI very clearly is this wonderful, wonderful project to reduce. To rebalance society by reducing the proportion of white people. And the Great Replacement Theory is the evil, awful. How dare you even suggest it, Conspiracy theory that there is a political project to reduce the proportion of white people in a given society. Do I have that right? The difference in definition between those two things is merely one of connotation. Dei, two thumbs up, big smile, Great Replacement theory, two thumbs, way down. That's totally fake. Dei, huh? Great Replacement Theory. That's all. That's the definition, that's the distinction. But they literally, at their most basic level, mean the same thing. Hmm. I think that's probably why Cory Booker, who is relatively more intelligent than Chris Murphy, that's why he had to move on. He knew he couldn't win the point debating the Democrats program for demographic shift. So he has to say, you think it's bad you don't like brown people. I never said that. What are you talking about? Okay, beyond the stupid political fights happening on Capitol Hill, for all of President Trump's excellent nominees, we have to move internationally because another member of Trump's administration, Marco Rubio, knocked it out of the park at the Munich Security Conference. Meanwhile, AOC struggled to pronounce her own name. We'll get to that momentarily. First, I wanna tell you about Brickhouse nutrition. Go to takelean.com, enter code knowles. This episode is sponsored by Brickhouse Nutrition. You've probably heard about those weight loss injections everyone's been talking about, and for good reason. The results can be pretty incredible. They work by helping regulate blood sugar and keeping your appetite in check. But here's the thing. Not everyone wants to deal with weekly injections, especially when you start hearing about some of the side effects that come with them. That's where Lean comes in. It's a weight loss supplement developed by doctors, and people are seeing some really impressive results. The ingredients in Lean are backed by research showing that they can help lower blood sugar, turn stored fat into energy, and reduce those constant cravings and hunger pangs that make dieting so hard. One important thing to know, Lean is not just designed for someone who wants to drop a couple pounds. The doctors at Brickhouse Nutrition specifically formulated it for people who've been struggling to lose 10 pounds or more and are ready for something that works. We've been hearing a lot of great stuff over here at dw. Multiple producers and employees at the Daily Wire have tried Lean. They've been so impressed with how effective Lean has been in a short period of time. Let's get you started with 20% off and free rush shipping so you can add Lean to your healthy diet and exercise plan. Go to takelean.com enter code knowles for your discount. That's promo code knowleskanaw l e [e-mail] Folks, a new episode of Bar Fight is out now where I take on the founder of White Dudes for Harris and another guy named Michael on the hottest topics of the week. Check out this teaser. You should be pissed off that the federal government is lying to you like this. Did we say military run camps? Military camps force people to be straight. I like that. That's exactly strong idea.

[Michael DeFeo]

I want to know why you expect to be taken seriously in a political debate when you showed up to the debate in a hoodie.

[Michael Knowles]

It's called Bar Fight. Well, welcome to Bar Fight. I'm Michael Knowles. I'm joined tonight by two guests. Co founder of White Dudes for Harris, senior advisor to Kamala Harris's presidential campaign, Mike Nellis. They've lied. We should take nothing that this administration says at face value. And now our next guest. He's a liberal content creator who spends most of his time complaining about the Democrat party, which is something that he and I actually have in common. That is Michael DeFeo. Thank you so much, man. Watch full episode now on the Michael Knowles YouTube channel. If you want the full show, including my personal topic and another 20 minutes of the best debate show in Nashville. Subscribe and watch on DailyWear plus you wanna get in on the action, watch in person. We're filming another episode tomorrow night. You must RSVP using the link in the description. We will see you there. The Munich Security Conference just took place. Now, this was the site last year of the vice president, J.D. vance, giving one of the great speeches in the history of the Trump administration, the Trump administrations, in which he shows up to the Munich Security Conference and he says, hey, guys, this liberal internationalism, it's not working. And the American people elected us to defend the interests of the United States. And in defending the interests of the United States, by the way, we will protect the global order, especially Europe. And it was this real tough love for people in Munich. It was an excellent, excellent speech. Marco Rubio comes out and gives what is tonally a very different speech from what the vice President gave last year. But listen in to specifically what the Secretary of State is saying.

[Marco Rubio]

The euphoria of this triumph led us to a dangerous delusion that we had entered, quote, the end of history, that every nation would now be a liberal democracy, that the ties formed by trade and by commerce alone would now replace nationhood. We are part of one civilization, Western civilization. We are bound to one another by the deepest bonds that nations could share, forged by centuries of shared history, Christian faith, culture, heritage, language, ancestry, and the sacrifices our forefathers made together. We are connected spiritually and we are connected culturally.

[Michael Knowles]

We want Europe.

[Marco Rubio]

The fundamental question we must answer at the outset is, what exactly are we defending? Because armies do not fight for abstractions. Armies fight for a people. Armies fight for a nation. Armies fight for a way of life.

[Michael Knowles]

Excellent, Excellent speech from the Secretary of State. It's beautiful. And it was very well stated in this very diplomatic way. And Rubio is the chief diplomat of the United States, and yet when you focus in on specifically what he was saying, what I find so delightful about this Munich Security Conference speech, it was basically the same speech Vance gave last year, but tonally it was different. Vance's speech was the tough love. Rubio's speech is the softer diplomatic view. So you have the vice president who. The vice president and the president have to be tougher. They gotta be more of the blunt instruments. The chief diplomat has to be more diplomatic. And yet there was perfect alignment. Listen at what beautiful. What Rubio said there at the end. Nations don't really fight for abstractions. Yes, there are ideas and ideals that inform war and national policy, but they fight for a people. That's what nations defend. Nations don't just defend ideas in the abstract. That's a liberal pretense, but it isn't true. We don't go to war for some vague idea that can be held by the Tibetans or the Vietnamese or the Mauritians. We fight for a people. That's what the civil authority in any country is supposed to do, to defend a people. And how does one defend a people? By defending a way of life, by defending a tradition, by defending families as they exist not only in the present moment, but as they have existed throughout the ages, from our ancestors down through our posterity. This is the kind of thing that our framers and founding fathers were writing about in the revolutionary era and in the Constitution, for that matter, in the Federalist Papers. Beautifully stated. You get a unified vision. And this, I think, is one of the most white pilling aspects of the Trump era is we're told that, you know what? Once Trump is gone, everyone's gonna fight for the future of the Republican Party and the whole MAGA project is gonna fall apart. Not from what I can see. Not from what I can see. From what I can see. One, we hear these rumblings of a JD Vance, Marco Rubio unity ticket already from the outset, an idea that's been promoted by the President of the United States multiple times and has been affirmed by the Secretary of State, who has already endorsed JD Vance, JD Vance, who said great things about Rubio, JD Vance, who promoted this speech. What you're seeing here is complementarity. We love Europe. This is our civilization. We're about more than just an economic zone, okay? That's what we recognize. Nations are more than economies. We want robust economies. We want economic strength. But nations are about more than that. We will not reduce our countries just to some stale material marketplace where we're all just trying to make an extra buck that nations don't last very long in that way. Moreover, we are not even an isolated little island in the United States. Yes, we're separated by a couple of oceans, but we come from somewhere. We come from the discoveries of Christopher Columbus. We come from the Mayflower, which is a great cigar brand. We come most directly from England, which gave us our system of law and our language, for that matter. We come even deeper, from Rome, from the Middle Ages, from Christendom. We come from the church. We come from the great artists. We have a unified civilization and we will defend that. And how will we defend it? Will we defend it through the stale institutions of liberal globalism? Marco Rubio says no.

[Marco Rubio]

The United nations still has tremendous potential to be a tool for good in the world. But we cannot ignore that today on the most pressing matters before us, it has no answers and has played virtually no role. It could not solve the war in Gaza. Instead it was American leadership that freed captives from barbarians and brought about a fragile truce. It has not solved the war in Ukraine. It took American leadership and partnership with many of the countries here today just to bring the two sides to the table in search of a still elusive peace. It was powerless to constrain the nuclear program of radical Shia clerics in tehran. That required 14 bombs dropped with precision from American B2 bombers. And it was unable to address the threat to our security from a narco terrorist dictator in Venezuela. Instead, it took American special forces to bring this fugitive to justice.

[Michael Knowles]

There we have it, this focus on the tangible. Liberalism wants to abstract everything into the ether. But nationalism, conservatism, ordinary patriotism, it brings it back down to earth. Patriotism being an extension of the love of one's own family, the family which is eminently tangible, the bedrock unit of society. He says it wasn't the UN that is solving these global problems, these global problems that spun out of control under the Biden administration, I'll point out, which has this undue faith in liberal internationalism. No, it was American leadership. And we're going to keep leading. And that will not merely benefit us and tyrannize everyone else. That will be conducive to the good of everyone. This is the make America great again idea. This is America pursuing our interests, putting America first, not to the exclusion of other people, but to put things in their proper order. It actually gets back to a point J.D. vance made months ago on the ordo amoris, the order of loves, the ordo caritatis, the idea that we have a greater responsibility to those who are close to us. A husband has a greater responsibility to his wife than he does to some lady down the street. And a nation has a greater responsibility to its constituents. And by caring for one's nearest, one can actually do much more good for the rest of the world than one can by inverting that order, by ignoring our families. Liberals do this all the time. The liberals hate their families, but they love humanity as a whole. You know, they care about some guy they never met on the other side of the world, so they say. But they hate everyone around them that's disordered. You're not gonna really do any good for anybody. I love this very, very good speech. I love that it complements the vice president's speech last year. I love that both of those speeches are downstream of President Trump's vision, because it means we do know what we want. It means there is unity on the right, which is rare, and it's a Happy occasion when it happens. And it means we know where we're looking in 2026 and 2028 if the Liberal institutions don't rig it for us by then. Now, the Democrats did not do as well at the Munich Security Conference. AOC seems to have lost her tongue. She doesn't. She just ended up stammering around when asked a very basic question about foreign policy. We'll get to that momentarily. First though, I want to tell you about Good Ranchers. Go to goodranchers.com, use code KNOWLES K N A W L E S. Folks, this is providential because you know what I had for dinner last night? I had the newest Good Ranchers product. I've been a Good Ranchers fan for many years now. New York Strip and their ribeye and the best burgers you've ever had in your life. And the non red meat stuff is very good too, but I'm more a red meat guy. Anyway. They've added filet mignon. I had them last night. Nice thick cut filet mignon. It is just magnificent. The price cannot possibly be beaten. The quality, it's American, so it's not injected with a bunch of weird stuff. You know, these are very serious guys who know what they're doing. But it's just so good. I actually had a little bit more than a filet mignon. Can you imagine that? Can you imagine that you can bring that level of luxury to your home on like a Tuesday night? It's unbelievable. The product is just top of the line right now. Go to goodranchers.com, use code knowles K N O W L E S. You will get an additional 25 bucks off your first order. That is K N O W L E S for $25 off on top of the $500 annual savings. When you subscribe, get a box. Definitely add in the strip steaks, the burgers. Sweet little Lisa loves the rib eyes. I'm more a strip guy than a ribeye guy. In the filet mignon. You have to add in the filet mignon and maybe some of the non red meat too. Goodranchers.com, american meat delivered. Extraordinarily articulate vision from Marco Rubio. Let's see how the other side did. AOC.

[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC)]

Would and should the US Actually.

[Michael DeFeo]

Commit US troops to defend Taiwan if.

[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC)]

China were to move?

[Michael DeFeo]

You know, I think that this is such a, you know, I think that this is a, this is of course, a very long standing policy of the United States. And I think what we are hoping for is that we want to make sure that we never get to that point. And we want to make sure that we are moving in all of our economic research and our global positions to avoid any such confrontation. And for that question to even arise.

[Michael Knowles]

Okay, she at least remembered how to use the English language there. By the end. That first part was particularly humiliating. After a question that was simple and certainly should have been expected. You're at the Munich Security Conference. You are being asked questions about, at the very least, the most basic parts of US foreign policy. What are we gonna do about Ukraine? What are we gonna do about the Middle east and the Holy Land? What are we going to do about Taiwan? Taiwan would be in the top three. This isn't some esoteric question on an AP exam, okay? This is, like, one of the most basic questions in US foreign policy. What are we gonna do about Taiwan? She goes, uh, uh, uh, duh, duh, Taiwan. Where's Taiwan? Is that. And then finally, after stammering around for what, 45 seconds, she goes, I just think, I hope we don't have to. I hope I don't have to answer that. I hope I don't have to answer that. That's her answer. Not ready for prime time. Aoc. AOC is not ready. And it's funny because when AOC first hit the scene, everyone made fun of her and called her stupid and ign. And then AOC impressed a lot of people with her ability to get attention, first of all, and to maneuver herself within the Democratic Party, which was initially hostile to her. So many people, myself included, softened up on AOC a little bit and said, you know, look, I don't know that the lady has done a lot of reading, but she's a pretty good political operator. She's pretty good at maneuvering. Now she's being talked about as a potential replacement for Chuck Schumer in the Senate or maybe even a presidential candidate. She's probably in the top three for the Democrats in 2028. And then that happens, and you remember, oh, she's just actually not ready for primetime because she doesn't actually know anything. I don't know AOC's IQ. I haven't seen her SAT scores. I don't think she's a Rhodes scholar. But furthermore, beyond raw intelligence, whatever she's lacking there, she doesn't know anything. She hasn't thought deeply about anything. This became abundantly clear when AOC took the opportunity to pitch actual communism at the Security Conference.

[Michael DeFeo]

Marco Rubio's speech was a pure appeal to Western culture. My favorite part was when he said that American cowboys came from Spain.

[Michael Knowles]

I thought they came from Winnie too.

[Michael DeFeo]

But I believe the Mexicans and descendants of African enslaved peoples would like to.

[Michael Knowles]

Have a word, put a pause here, hold on. Even before she gets to her pitch of communism, even this, she goes, marco Rubio said that we have Spain to thank for cowboys. What a total wacko. I mean, we all know it's just black people and Hispanics who. Does she not know that there weren't just always horses in America? Does she not? She probably doesn't know that. She probably doesn't know that Spain introduced horses to America. Spain also, she refers to the Hispanic people and the black people in America. Europeans also introduced black people to America. And Europeans also created the Hispanic race, the Latino race, which is a mixture of American indigenous and European Spanish. So she also probably does it, but at a more basic, at a simpler level. She doesn't know that it was Europeans who brought the horses here. She has vague impressions of history, she has a narrative, she has an ideology, but she doesn't have any of the facts, the data points that undergird that ideology. This was a big shift that happened actually when AOC and I were in elementary and middle and high school in virtually the same area. AOC was a town over for me. She was in the whiter, richer town over for me in Westchester County. And AOC and I, when we were in school, the way we were taught, history generally was great trends, great themes. Previously, history had been taught on facts, men and dates and battles and things that happened. And then if you were going to come up with a theory of history, if you were going to arrive at some ideology, you would arrive at that after you had at least memorized some facts of history. By the time we got to school, that had flipped. You weren't really supposed to learn dates and battles and men and facts. As long as you had the general trends, that would suffice. And that's clearly what's going on with AOC here. So then this brings us to her ideological pitch at the Munich Security Conference, which was literally for communism.

[Michael DeFeo]

But I think it's also important to note how thin that foundation is. The response that we have to have is, again, it's material, it's class based, it's common interest. When we talk about a class based internationalist perspective also means ending the hypocrisy towards the global South.

[Michael Knowles]

Okay, so there were a lot of buzzwords here, Global south, hypocrisy. But then what was that phrase you just Used a class based international perspective. Let me translate that into common language. Class based internationalism is communism. It is Marxist. Leninist Stalin actually shifts it a little bit into a more national kind of communism. But the idea is that there are different structures for the world order. There are different possibilities. You could have a system of nation states where different peoples have sovereignty and they get along together in the world while pursuing their own national interest. There is the empire model where you have great powers that comprise lots of different peoples, but they have a broad swath of territory with some basic shared aspects of law, a different but shared conception of the common good, and they face off against other great powers. And then there is an international class based form of world order which is communism. Workers of the world unite proletariat. Throw off your shackles. That's what AOC is pitching here, mixed in with some weird kind of racial, vaguely nationalist perspectives like justice for the global south or whatever. But I guess it's primarily communism hasn't worked by the way, which is why even the Soviet Union had to shift to a more national and imperial perspective than a workers of the world unite perspective. But furthermore, this kind of communism isn't even the smart kind of communism. I guess there's no such thing as smart communism. But there was at least, you know, when Karl Marx is writing and he's quoting Ludwig Feuerbach and he's thinking seriously about history and he's engaging with serious thinkers, he's citing facts, he's giving some argument for his ultimately demonic ideology. AOC only has the slogans. The other reason why it's hard to be a smart communist today is because after the 19th century there were many experiments with communism and, and they always turned out bad, every single time with that exception. So to even take Marx seriously today is to come to grips with that fact. And if you're gonna try to salvage Marx, you have to shift what he's talking about. She doesn't do that. She just goes back to the slogans from OG Marxism without anything to back it up. This lady is not ready for primetime. This lady is just not ready for primetime. This was very embarrassing. You had a. You had a sophisticated speech from Rubio where he talks about material interests. Just like AOC says we need to talk about material interests. Rubio's totally wrong. Rubio's specifically talking about material interests. He says we don't fight for abstractions. We fight for peoples, for a way of life, for material goods within the context of a culture. AOC can't even grant that Culture. What is European culture? What is that? You know, it's just. Well, it's that meme going around of so much of Democrat discourse is them pretending not to understand things, making communication impossible. Rough performance. You can tell AOC is freaking out about it. She reportedly called the New York Times, pleading with them to change their coverage of her appearance there, saying, oh, it's all being misunderstood. I'm not even running for president. You don't get it. I was misunderstood. This was bad. This set AOC way back because for years AOC was considered just a complete clown, like a total dolt. And she had finally gained some prestige and some mojo within the Democrat Party. And she had convinced people that she had learned things and she had matured and been educated. And then this appearance at the MSC just totally shoots that down. This woman has learned nothing. She's not even more polished rhetorically. Hey, AOC Would President AOC defend Taiwan? Where do cowboys come from? Just really pathetic. Really, really pathetic. The consistent AOC underestimators are completely vindicated here. Okay? Now, somehow, even wackier than AOC Barack Obama just told the liberal commentator Brian Tyler Cohen that aliens are real. We'll get to that momentarily. First though, folks, it's Mardi Gras, les bon temps roulet day before Lent. Ash Wednesday's tomorrow. It's Fat Tuesday. You know, a lot of people in this culture, they focus on the feast and then the hangover. We go first the fast and then the feast. For those of you who understand the importance of this penitential time, you can incense your home, make it smell like a 12th century monastery with our best selling smells and bells candle. It's got frankincense. It's got. I think it has myrrh. It's wonderful. It's a wonderful candle. We've sold out of like three iterations of this. I think we still have some slightly differently colored vessel. As of now. I think there are still some orders of whatever the latest iteration is. We're getting pretty slim though, on ways to restock the various materials. So if you want one, go to thecandleclub.com today. Do you have the Daily Wire plus app? Do you? Yes or no? You tell me if you do not. Just. It's okay, it's okay. Just stop what you're doing. Download it to your phone, download it to your tv. You can get it on Roku, Vizio, Samsung, Apple tv. You're not supposed to pick favorites. They say this with the Mayflower cigarettes. They say, what's your favorite. I just tell them. They say, you're not supposed to pick favorites. They say, well, I have a favorite. When it comes to the Pendragon cycle, Rise of the Merlin, which Roger Avery, author of Pulp Fiction, just came out and said is just absolutely unbelievable. A lot of people are saying it. Episode six is the one. Episode six is the one everyone's talking about, the crazy battle scenes, everything. So wherever you watch, get this, epic episodes one through five of the Pendragon cycle, Rise to the Merlin. This Thursday, episode six comes out. Get it on the app. My favorite comment Yesterday is from OliviaVaun4428, who says, it's amazing that with food stamps you can't buy rotisserie chicken because it's considered warm food, but you can buy liters of soda and candy bars. Yeah, it's pretty crazy. There probably should be some loss leader exception on this because the weird thing about a lot of grocery stores is it's actually cheaper to buy the rotisserie chicken cooked than it is to buy a chicken and then rotisserie it yourself. So, yeah, yeah, it's a weird one. But anyway, those indulgent zoomers, they keep trying to feed themselves those rapscallions. Okay, speaking of young people, somewhat young, slightly young people, probably a millennial. Brian Tyler Cohen just interviewed Barack Obama, and Obama decided to make a little news here. Obama declared that aliens are real. Are aliens real? They're real, but I haven't seen them. And they're not being kept in, what is it, Area 51? Area 51? There's no underground facility unless there's this enormous conspiracy and they hid it from the President of the United States. What was the first question you wanted answered when you became president? Where are the aliens? Where are the aliens? Okay, so then it cuts off here. If you listen to his next question, he just moves on. He just moves on. He goes, okay, well, anyway, da, da, da, da da. Obama has a funny answer here, but Brian Tyler Cohen, I think, has set the new gold standard for incompetence at interviewing. He says, okay, are aliens real? Yes, they're real. He says, okay, moving on. What's the first question you wanted answered when you became president? And Obama even gives it to him. He gives him the follow up. He's like, I wanna know where the aliens are. That's a funny follow up. And then Cohen just moves on. No follow up. No. A president of the United States is declaring that aliens are real. And this guy, this joker, decides he's not even gonna follow up on. Oh, how do you know that? How do you know that aliens are real? And now Obama's come out to clarify, says, well, I don't know that aliens are real. And he gives that whole liberal nonsense, but, you know, the universe is really big and universe is really big. And so statistically there has to be intelligent life elsewhere in the universe. They never explain why that is, by the way, because in order to ascertain the probability of something, you have to know how that thing came about in the first place. You have to know anything about that thing. And we don't at the level of pure nature, I think we do actually know it from the level of theology and anthropology, but from the level purely of nature. We don't know how life came about. We don't know, for instance, how one goes from inorganic to organic matter. We just have no idea. There have been a zillion theories over the years and none of them have been proven and some of them have been disproven. So the argument that the universe is really, really big actually does not imply that there is intelligent life or life of any kind anywhere else. It doesn't imply that. But the reason that the libs love aliens is because the existence of aliens diminishes the distinction of human beings. It makes us less special. That's usually explicitly their argument. They say, what, you think you're so special, a universe that's 8, gazillion bajillion miles wide and expanding and with countless worlds, you think you're so special? And my answer, and the Christian answer, but my answer, even from all my sense data, is, yeah, I think we're pretty special. The deeper reason that the libs always promote aliens is because it diminishes the incarnation, because Christ is a man, because God becomes a man, he doesn't become ET he doesn't become a gazelle, he becomes a man. And he raises our very humanity to inestimable dignity. And the libs and demons want to diminish that Satan falls from heaven because he can't bow down to a man. Basically, that's what's at the heart of this. I'm not saying that all the libs who promote the alien stuff are, like, actively working with demons. I'm really not. I don't see demons under every rock. But it is curious that so much of liberalism comes down to a prideful attempt to exalt man above his station and ends by degrading man below his station. It begins by this notion that we'll have no kings or priests. You Know man will only be free when the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest. We're just humanists now. We're going to raise humanity up. We're going to maximize individual autonomy. And then what's the end of it? The end of it is we degrade ourselves. We pretend that we're just sacks of meat that exist only for pleasure. And we promote things like abortion, slaughtering babies, degrading humanity. We promote things like suicide, slaughtering ourselves, degrading humanity. We reduce ourselves below actually the station to which we've been raised. No surprise there. So when Obama says, look, I'm clarifying, I actually don't really, I don't know, I didn't see any evidence of the aliens. I think he's probably being honest here. I think his knee jerk reaction of, well, of course aliens exist. His certainty in that just comes from his liberalism. We have to be. Humans aren't special. You think yourself special, but we are. We are actually. It's actually a harder truth. It is a more realistic view, but it's more difficult and it entails more responsibility to say, yes, we are special. It's kind of weird, right? That we, among all of the created things have rational wills. Isn't that kind of weird that we can conceive of abstract things, unlike every animal and plant and all organic matter on Earth? That we are finite, immortal, we die. But we have this immortal, eternal aspect to ourselves because we can reason. Isn't that kind of weird that like nothing else that we've ever encountered or really even can conceive of has that has that combination of flesh and reason and will. Isn't that like, weird? That makes us kind of special. You are special. Believe it or not. Believe it or not. Okay, so much more to get to. I guess we don't have Dr. Epstein. I know he's like on the other side of the world right now. He's not on Mars, but he's on the other side of the world. We'll try to get Dr. Epstein later on this week. Today though, we have to go because it's Tee Hee Tuesday. The rest of the show continues now. You do not want to miss it. Become a member. Use code knowlescanawles at checkout for two months free on all annual plans.

[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC)]

What was it like, Merlin? To be alone with God? Is that who you think I was alone with?

[Michael Knowles]

Maradin? I knew your father. I am yet convinced that he was not of this world.

[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC)]

All men know of the great Taliesin.

[Michael Knowles]

You are my father.

[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC)]

That the gods should war for my soul. Princess Garris, savior of our people. I know what the Bull God offered you. I was offered the same. And there is a new pirate work in the world. I've seen it. A God who sacrifices what he loves for us. We are each given only one life, Singer.

[Michael Knowles]

No.

[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC)]

We're given another. I learned of Yazu the Christ and I have become his follower.

[Marco Rubio]

He's waiting on a miracle.

[Michael Knowles]

And I think you can give him one.

[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC)]

Trust in ya's. He is the only hope for men like us. Fate of Britain never rests in the hands of the great life. Great light, great darkness. Such things mattered to me then. What matters to you now, Mistress of lies? You, nephew. The sword of a high king. How many lives must be lost before you accept the power you were born to wield? So cling to the promises of a God who has abandoned you. I cannot take up that sword again. You know what you must do.

[Michael Knowles]

Great life.

[Marco Rubio]

Forgive me.

[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC)]

The time has come to be reborn.

[Michael Knowles]

Lifelock. How can I help?

[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC)]

The IRS said I filed my return, but I haven't.

[Michael Knowles]

One in four taxpaying Americans has paid the price of identity fraud.

[Michael DeFeo]

What do I do?

[Michael Knowles]

My refund.

[Jeremy Carl]

Though.

[Michael Knowles]

I'm freaking out. Don't worry. I can fix this. LifeLock fixes identity theft. Guaranteed. And gets your money back with up to $3 million in coverage.

[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC)]

I'm so relieved.

[Michael Knowles]

No problem. I'll be with you every step of the way. One in four was a fraud. Paying American. Not anymore. Save up to 40% your first year. Visit lifelock.com podcast terms apply.