The Michael Knowles Show – "Friendly Fire: Hegseth, Homeland Security & Happy Meals"
Date: December 2, 2025
Podcast: The Michael Knowles Show (The Daily Wire)
Featured:
- Michael Knowles (Host)
- Ben Shapiro
- Matt Walsh
Episode Overview
This episode delves into three core topics:
- The shifting political discourse on immigration following a tragic attack.
- Philosophical and practical debates about assimilation and immigration policy, with a critical eye on mass migration and welfare dependency.
- The perceived decline in restaurant quality and its ties to broader cultural and economic trends.
- The ethics and legality of aggressive U.S. actions against narco-traffickers, particularly recent military strikes, and regime change in Latin America.
Taking a characteristically pugnacious tone, Knowles and guests cut through what they see as ideological delusions on both the left and right, focusing on what they believe best serves American interests—in migration, culture, and foreign policy.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Immigration, Crime, and National Security
Context & Triggers:
- Discussion was prompted by a Thanksgiving-week shooting of two National Guardsmen by an Afghan immigrant (03:00–04:15).
- The hosts highlight other incidents involving Afghan and Somali migrants, connecting them to perceived systemic problems with current U.S. immigration policy.
Main Points:
- Matt Walsh: Endorses Trump’s call to "shut off third world immigration" and advocates for "denaturalizing" even legal citizens who have committed fraud or failed to assimilate.
“We need to look at denaturalizing...deporting people who are, as you say, ostensibly legal citizens. Denaturalize them. And it's not just because we don't like them. It's because they are committing fraud.” (04:22)
- Ben Shapiro: Distinguishes between Afghan and Somali contexts, saying with Somalis there is "no American debt," and criticizes the exponential increase in Somali migration (from 2,500 in 1990 to 175,000 now).
“The idea that we had to go from 2,500 Somalis living in the United States in 1990 to 175,000...as some sort of apology...is pretty insane.” (08:15)
- Michael, Ben, and Matt agree that institutions (welfare, legal threats of discrimination suits) have made assimilation harder, radicalization easier, and criminal accountability rarer.
- Ben stresses the rise of "tribalism" among migrant groups (e.g., Somali mayoral races split by clan loyalty) and faults current policies for undermining both national cohesion and public safety.
“We don't need that sort of full scale tribalism in the United States. We’ve got enough problems as it is.” (08:13)
Philosophical Underpinnings:
- Cites Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, and Jewish law as supporting selective, heavily scrutinized immigration as a means of preserving national solidarity.
- Michael Knowles:
“Immigration can reduce social solidarity…We could take any number of Englishmen…and they would be just fine…It’s much harder to bring in Somalis or Pakistanis or Afghanis.” (12:32–13:44)
2. Assimilation: Individual vs. Group Policy
Debate on Assimilability:
- Ben expresses even deeper pessimism: even high levels of English immigration might now introduce leftist political ideologies; the real issue is modern Western self-doubt and lack of shared values (16:05–17:11).
- More restrictionist positions floated: policy should be case-by-case, with each individual having to prove unique value to America.
- Matt Walsh offers a satirical "waste disposal test":
“If your country has not figured out waste disposal…we're not going to accept anyone from your country…” (20:32)
Group Stereotypes and IQ:
- Walsh controversially notes average Somali IQ statistics to justify exclusive policies; all agree group trends matter but exceptional individuals exist (23:07).
- Ben provides counterpoint, citing Ayaan Hirsi Ali as an example of a positive individual exception, but stresses these exceptions don’t negate general rules.
American Identity & Heritage:
- Discussion of loyalty to homeland (“blood is stronger than…personal choice and heritage is enduring, absolutely” – Matt, 23:36).
- The historical norm in America: you can adopt an American identity, but this takes time, cross-generational integration, and should be monitored.
Mass Migration vs. Merit-based Immigration:
- General consensus: mass migration precludes adequate filtering of individuals and weakens assimilation; smarter, more “gritty” immigrants should be selected when at all.
- Ben and Michael both blame the 1965 Hart-Celler Act and expanded welfare for undermining the value and outcomes of post-1965 immigration.
“...the gigantic welfare system that allows people to live off the public dimension and then integrate into our worst places, colleges and universities, and learn the kind of crap that Wajahad Ali was taught.” (28:00)
3. The Decline of Restaurants and American Food Culture
Matt Walsh’s Viral Rant:
- Claims restaurant and fast food quality has objectively declined due to changes in ownership (private equity), cost-cutting, and generic supply chains (Chains using the same frozen/distributor food, 35:00–38:39).
- Employees today perceived as less invested, less competent, and less connected to the business outcome than previous generations; more often older adults with substance issues, not high school students earning starter wages.
- Ben Shapiro offers a rebuttal with a “hard data” approach, naming specific chains that have improved (Domino’s, Arby’s) and those that have declined (KFC, Outback), countering nostalgia with present-day consumer experience (41:08).
- Matt’s main concern is the American “loss of care” and quality control—in food and customer service more broadly (e.g., tech support anecdote, 45:32).
Notable Quotes:
- Walsh:
“All pizza tastes like cardboard with ketchup smeared on it...Everything is really salty and it tastes bad.” (36:03–36:19)
- Shapiro:
“With chain restaurants, I basically call you all ignorant on your use of fast food.” (41:08)
- Knowles:
“I’m a secret fat guy.” (43:55)
Broader Themes:
- Discussion links restaurant decline to broader trends—rising out-of-home dining, loss of small family businesses, corporate consolidation, and an American “lowering of standards” in public life.
4. U.S. Military Strikes on Narco-Traffickers (Hegseth Controversy)
Background:
- The U.S. Secretary of War (Pete Hegseth) recently ordered strikes on Venezuelan narco-trafficker boats.
- Liberals and some on the right allege war crimes, particularly in the rumored “oral order” to kill all on board—even survivors.
Panel Reaction:
- Walsh: No legal or moral problem—destroying narco-terrorist assets is more justifiable than most previous U.S. military actions abroad.
“Please kill more...more defensible than anything the United States of America has ever done in the Middle East, like, ever.” (49:54)
- Ben: Morally and practically justified—military should destroy boats; only real legal question is on Congressional authorization, and whether incapacitated survivors should be targeted. Skeptical of the “kill-everyone” order story's veracity, suggests Democrat/media coordination to paralyze the military (52:40–55:59)
- Knowles:
“We have exercised control over the Western hemisphere for over 200 years. And now the Democrats are...on the side of the narco terrorists?” (56:06)
International/Legal Analysis:
- International law and the Geneva Convention discussed; argument that non-state terrorists and drug cartels do not deserve the same protections as battlefield soldiers (56:06–58:14).
- Political angle: Dems’ procedural nitpicks lose to popular desire for security; being "on the side" of traffickers is a political loser.
Regime Change in Venezuela:
- Panel expresses conditional support—if removing Maduro is cheap and doesn’t require a major intervention, it’s worth it (58:14–59:45).
- Skepticism about CIA competence (burn-after-reading vs. omnipotent Bond/Bourne), realism about risk vs. reward in Latin America policy (64:49–65:24).
5. Memorable Moments & Notable Quotes
- "If your country has not figured out waste disposal…we're not going to accept anyone…" – Matt, (20:32)
- “I'm a secret fat guy.” – Michael, (43:55)
- “We need to look at denaturalizing…deporting people who are, as you say, ostensibly legal citizens.” – Matt, (04:22)
- “All pizza tastes like cardboard with ketchup smeared on it...” – Matt, (36:03)
- “It's family versus corporate…in the kosher community, every single restaurant is a family owned restaurant.” – Ben, (38:57)
- “Please kill more [narco terrorists].” – Matt, (49:54)
- “If you're talking about 100,000 troops, that's a completely different story.” – Ben, (64:13)
- “I do want the oil though. I want the oil and I actually love that Trump is open about it.” – Michael, (65:39)
Key Timestamps for Important Segments
- 03:00–04:15 – Host introduction, summary of triggering incidents
- 04:17–08:15 – Matt Walsh's hardline immigration stance and Somali anecdote
- 12:05–13:44 – Classical philosophy on selective assimilation
- 20:27–23:07 – Group vs. individual merit in immigrant selection, average IQ stats cited
- 23:36 – Loyalty to homeland vs. assimilability
- 36:03–38:39 – Walsh’s "why restaurants suck now" rant
- 41:08–44:03 – Ben’s fast food ranking and analysis
- 49:54–52:36 – Narco terrorist boat strike controversy (pro/con, political/legal fallout)
- 58:14–61:16 – Venezuela, regime change, US hemispheric dominance
