Gay Church? HEATED Religion Debate With Michael Knowles

The Michael Knowles Show

Published: Sun Mar 16 2025

What does the Bible really say about gay marriage, homosexuality, and transgenderism? In this thought-provoking panel debate, Catholic host Michael Knowles is joined by Protestant pastor Jonny Ardavanis of Stonebridge Bible Church, alongside Revs. Brandon Robertson and Alexandre da Silva Souto, two LGBTQ-affirming Christian leaders, to tackle one of the most divisive theological debates of our time. Is LGBTQ acceptance supported by Scripture? Does traditional Christian teaching conflict with modern views on identity? What is the biblical foundation for marriage? - - - Today's Sponsor: Hallow - Put your relationship with God first. Head over to https://hallow.com/knowles for three months free today!

Summary

Podcast Summary: "Gay Church? HEATED Religion Debate With Michael Knowles"

Podcast Information:

Title: The Michael Knowles Show
Host/Author: The Daily Wire
Episode: Gay Church? HEATED Religion Debate With Michael Knowles
Release Date: March 16, 2025

Introduction

In this intense and thought-provoking episode of The Michael Knowles Show, host Michael Knowles engages in a heated debate with a panel comprising Reverend Brandon Robertson of Sunnyside Reformed Church in New York City, Reverend Alexandra Da Silva Soto—a non-binary minister—and Johnny Artivanis, pastor at Stonebridge Bible Church in Franklin, Tennessee. The central theme revolves around the compatibility of LGBT identities with Christianity, delving deep into biblical interpretations, theological doctrines, and the societal implications of such integrations.

Panel Introductions and Opening Remarks (00:00 – 01:51)

Reverend Alexandra Da Silva Soto (00:00): Opens the discussion by expressing a complex understanding of gender and sexuality, challenging simplistic viewpoints.
Johnny Artivanis (00:10): Emphasizes tradition by referencing Jesus' teachings on prayer, hinting at a preference for established doctrines over contemporary reinterpretations.
Michael Knowles (01:16): Introduces the panelists and sets the stage for the debate on whether LGBT is part of Christianity, posing critical questions about biblical condemnation versus inclusion.

Biblical Interpretations on Homosexuality (02:10 – 14:28)

Reverend Brandon Robertson (02:10): Argues that the Bible does not condemn loving, consensual same-sex relationships. He reinterprets passages like Genesis 19 (Sodom and Gomorrah) and Jude 7, suggesting they address inhospitality and abuse rather than homosexuality.
- Quote: “[...] Sodom and Gomorrah is condemning sex between angels, which is a surprising thing.” (02:50)
Michael Knowles (02:34): Challenges this interpretation by citing traditional condemnations of homosexuality in Genesis and other scriptures.
Johnny Artivanis (04:05): Presents a counter-argument emphasizing clear biblical prohibitions against homosexuality, referencing Leviticus 18 and 20, and Paul’s letters. He underscores marriage between a man and a woman as the biblical norm.
- Quote: “[...] the Bible is very clear because the metanarrative of scripture begins with the marriage between a man and a woman.” (05:11)
Reverend Alexandra Da Silva Soto (06:34): Clarifies her non-binary identity and critiques traditional biblical interpretations. She argues that terms translated as referring to homosexuality historically pertain to abuse and exploitation, not consensual relationships.
- Quote: “[...] queer people are human. [...] criminalizing the ability of a person to love another person [...] Terrorizing individuals.” (08:26)

Theological Authority and Scriptural Inerrancy (14:28 – 25:07)

Michael Knowles (05:26 – 08:26): Questions the authority ground for Reverend Soto's position, referencing traditions across various denominations that maintain traditional views on sexuality.
Reverend Brandon Robertson (21:00 – 24:13): Challenges the notion of scriptural inerrancy, advocating for progressive revelation. He suggests that Jesus revises Old Testament commandments to offer more ethical directives, such as turning the other cheek.
Michael Knowles (23:43 – 25:07): Defends traditional views on inerrancy, citing Catholic teachings like Humanae Vitae and the consistent stance of the Church against LGBT identities. He probes whether Reverend Robertson's progressive stance aligns with historical theological teachings.
- Quote: “[...] natural law is eternal, and it's also inscribed in every human heart.” (25:07)

Gender and the Nature of God (25:07 – 37:35)

Michael Knowles (25:07 – 37:35): Shifts focus to gender identity within theology, questioning Reverend Robertson’s claim that God is transgender. He asserts that God is referred to with male pronouns in scripture and challenges the compatibility of non-binary identities with traditional theological concepts.
- Quote: “[...] Why would you not respect God's pronouns?” (00:18)
Reverend Brandon Robertson (35:21 – 36:49): Defends the use of varied pronouns for God, citing historical mystic Catholic writings that refer to God in multiple genders. He argues that God transcends human gender binaries and embraces all gender identities.
- Quote: “[...] God transcends gender and is transgender. All of that is within God.” (36:49)
Reverend Alexandra Da Silva Soto (25:23 – 37:35): Highlights the absence of explicit biblical references to homosexuality by Jesus, advocating for a focus on other teachings like Jesus’ stance against divorce. She argues against scapegoating LGBT identities based on limited scriptural mentions.
- Quote: “[...] Jesus never said a word about what is being framed as homosexuality.” (08:26)

Mental Health and Social Implications (37:35 – 58:52)

Michael Knowles (37:35 – 58:52): Raises concerns about the high rates of anxiety, depression, and suicide among LGBT individuals despite societal acceptance. He challenges the notion that social stigma is the sole cause, suggesting intrinsic conflicts between LGBT identities and natural law contribute to these mental health issues.
- Quote: “[...] this suggests that maybe there's something about the identity itself and not just mean old guys like Johnny here.” (58:52)
Reverend Brandon Robertson (47:44 – 59:32): Counters by asserting that trauma stems from societal rejection and harassment, not the identities themselves. He emphasizes that despite legal and cultural advancements, many LGBT individuals still face significant discrimination, especially in conservative regions.
- Quote: “[...] trauma responses that I see in LGBT people is they come from families or churches that have rejected them.” (56:37)
Reverend Alexandra Da Silva Soto (50:05 – 52:55): Discusses ongoing struggles within the trans community, such as unemployment and housing discrimination. She argues that despite some legal protections, systemic targeting and lack of full societal acceptance continue to negatively impact mental health.
- Quote: “[...] trans people are still unable to find jobs, still unable to find housing, still unable to be fully welcomed.” (52:15)
Johnny Artivanis (58:52 – 60:21): Reinforces the biblical perspective on natural law and gender binaries, linking deviation from these to psychological distress. He emphasizes adherence to Scripture for mental and spiritual well-being.
- Quote: “[...] in regards to the trans conversation, you can't get much clearer than Jesus affirming the gender binary.” (55:32)

Conclusion and Final Remarks (58:52 – 60:21)

Michael Knowles (58:52 – End): Summarizes the debate by reiterating the persistence of high mental health issues among LGBT individuals despite societal acceptance. He questions the efficacy of cultural changes in alleviating these issues and suggests a need to revisit traditional views on natural law.
Reverend Brandon Robertson & Reverend Alexandra Da Silva Soto (59:32 – End): Offer final thoughts emphasizing ongoing challenges faced by the LGBT community despite advancements and argue that deeper societal and theological acceptance is necessary for genuine inclusion and well-being.
Johnny Artivanis (60:21): Concludes with a reaffirmation of traditional biblical teachings on gender and sexuality, stressing the importance of aligning personal identity with scriptural truth for holistic well-being.
Michael Knowles (60:19 – End): Thanks the panelists and underscores the contentious nature of the debate, expressing a desire for continued dialogue in future episodes.

Notable Quotes with Timestamps

Reverend Brandon Robertson (02:34): “The Bible does not condemn loving, consensual same-sex relationships in any of the passages that are traditionally used against LGBT people.”
Johnny Artivanis (05:11): “The Bible is very clear because the metanarrative of scripture begins with the marriage between a man and a woman.”
Reverend Alexandra Da Silva Soto (08:26): “We have thousands of queer folk end up in very self-destructive lives and behaviors, not because homosexuality pushes them to be in that behavior.”
Michael Knowles (25:07): “The moral law is eternal, and it's inscribed in every human heart.”
Reverend Brandon Robertson (36:49): “God transcends gender and is transgender. All of that is within God.”
Michael Knowles (58:52): “Isn't the fact that they haven't declined and in some cases have gone up, doesn't that suggest that maybe there's something about the identity itself and not just mean old guys like Johnny here?”
Reverend Brandon Robertson (56:37): “Most of the trauma responses that I see in LGBT people is they come from families or churches that have rejected them.”
Johnny Artivanis (55:32): “In regards to the gender, you have to understand that right now in glory, Jesus is a man.”

Key Takeaways

Biblical Interpretation: The panelists diverge sharply on interpreting biblical texts related to homosexuality, with Robertson and Soto advocating for inclusive interpretations, while Artivanis and Knowles uphold traditional condemnations.
Theological Authority: A significant portion of the debate centers on the authority of scripture and the concept of progressive revelation versus scriptural inerrancy.
Gender and Divinity: Discussions extend to the nature of God’s gender, with Robertson proposing a transcendent, non-binary understanding, countered by traditional views emphasizing male pronouns and gender binaries.
Mental Health: The conversation highlights the persistent mental health struggles within the LGBT community, debating whether these are rooted in social rejection or inherent conflicts with natural law.
Societal Acceptance vs. Compliance: Despite legal and cultural strides towards acceptance, panelists argue about the real-world impacts on LGBT individuals’ well-being, suggesting that superficial acceptance does not equate to genuine inclusion or happiness.
Future Implications: The episode underscores the ongoing tension between evolving societal norms and traditional religious doctrines, indicating that future debates will likely continue to navigate these complex intersections.

Conclusion

"Gay Church? HEATED Religion Debate With Michael Knowles" presents a robust and multifaceted discussion on the intersection of LGBT identities and Christianity. Through passionate arguments and diverse perspectives, the episode invites listeners to reflect deeply on theological interpretations, the nature of divine authority, and the real-life implications of these debates on individuals and communities.