
Michael Knowles gives his instant reaction to Kamala Harris giving her concession speech. Soak up the liberal tears with Michael as we are now finally unburdened from what has been.
Loading summary
A
Right now, go to silencershop.com knowles the Second Amendment safeguards our freedom from tyranny. As responsible gun owners, it is our job to stay sharp and protect those rights. That is where Silencer Shop comes in. America's leading provider of firearm suppressors, Silencers are completely legal. Silencer Shop makes getting one easier than ever. They offer the largest selection of top brand suppressors. Their expert team handles all the paperwork for you. Are you ready to enhance your firearms? Visit silencershop.com knowles today silencershop.com knowles silencer shop the easiest and best way to get your suppressor. Kamala Harris has finally conceded and her speech was fine. I think people are overstating how good her speech was. Yes, it was the most coherent we've ever heard her. Yes, she was gracious, I suppose, relatively gracious. But first of all, it's a scandal that she gave this speech 12 hours late. It was clear last night that she had lost. She lost in a landslide. An electoral vote. Landslide. She lost the popular vote. First time a Republican won the popular vote in 20 years. It was over. The fact that she waited this long is disrespectful to the American people and to her voters in particular. But okay, she does an okay job. 12 hours later, fine, she was gracious. Fine. It was easy for her to be gracious. She had no business being the Democrat nominee in the first place. When someone runs and wins primary after primary and earns the votes of members of his or her own party and then loses, you can understand why it's so emotional. This woman got further in politics than she ever deserved to get. She was picked, as, in Joe Biden's own words, a DEI hire as vp. And then there was a palace coup that installed her as the Democrat nominee without ever having to win a single vote in a primaries. So, yeah, easy come, easy go. It was relatively easy for her to be gracious. And in fact, the graciousness of the speech was in itself a scandal because the entire basis of the Kamala campaign and of the Biden campaign was that Trump posed an existential threat to the republic. That Trump's Hitler. Well, if Trump is Hitler, if Trump poses an existential threat to the republic, then it's actually bizarre and wrong for her to be so gracious in handing over power, for her to be so sanguine. Okay, look, we had a hard fought fight, but now Hitler's president, okay? And it's gonna be fine. This man, who in his very person is gonna destroy the republic and the Constitution, pose an existential threat to her. It's fine. It's no big deal. She is admitting in that kind of a concession that she was lying or that she has just no judgment whatsoever now. But really, it's the former, that they were lying when they said that Trump was Hitler, that he posed an existential threat to the republic. And those lies justified his assassination, which nearly occurred, came very near to occurring when he got shot in the ear and then almost occurred a second time, too. So, yeah, okay. By the way, had that candidate really shown up the whole time, that candidate who was a little more coherent and a little more gracious and normal, fewer cackles, I don't think it would have made much of a difference either. Maybe she would have gotten an extra few electoral votes, but the landslide was baked in. And the reason that Kamala could be cajoled into conceding even half a day late is because the American people made their preference so clear. Nobody really wanted this woman to be president. And the majority of Americans, majority of Americans in their states, through their electors, made clear they wanted Trump to be the 47th president. And just the outright majority of Americans wanted him to be president. They don't want to hear from this woman anymore. And now we will not have to. Joy cometh in the morning.
B
If Michael Knowles is good for anything, it's Mayflower cigars. And luckily, boxes of Mayflower's premium handmade cigars are now back in stock with limited quantities. Now's the time to sample Mayflower signature blends and stock up on your favorites. Plus, get yourself a beautiful Zika double guillotine cutter. Don't wait. These will sell out. You must be 21 years or older to order. Some exclusions apply. Go to mayflowercigars.com today.
Podcast Summary: The Michael Knowles Show – "Michael Knowles Kamala Concession REACTION"
Date: [Insert Episode Date]
Host: Michael Knowles
Podcast: The Michael Knowles Show
Publisher: The Daily Wire
In the episode titled "Michael Knowles Kamala Concession REACTION," host Michael Knowles delves into Kamala Harris' recent concession speech following the electoral results. Knowles offers a critical analysis of Harris' performance, the timing of her concession, and the broader implications for American politics. This summary encapsulates the key points, discussions, and insights presented by Knowles during the episode.
1. Timing of the Concession
Knowles begins by addressing the delay in Kamala Harris' concession speech. He expresses his disapproval of her waiting 12 hours post-election to concede.
Knowles argues that the prolonged wait was disrespectful to both the American people and her supporters, emphasizing the landslide nature of the defeat.
2. Assessment of the Speech's Quality
While acknowledging that Harris' speech was the most coherent he's heard from her, Knowles maintains a critical stance.
Despite recognizing improvements, he feels that her graciousness is misplaced given the context of the campaign.
3. Questioning Harris' Qualification as the Nominee
Knowles challenges the legitimacy of Harris' position as the Democratic nominee, suggesting it was a result of political maneuvering rather than genuine voter support.
He further alleges that her candidacy was orchestrated without winning primary votes, labeling her as a "palace coup."
4. Allegations of Deception in the Campaign
Knowles accuses the Biden and Harris campaigns of deceit, particularly regarding their portrayal of former President Trump.
He links these alleged lies to extreme measures taken against Trump, including assassination attempts.
5. Predicting Minimal Impact of a Different Candidate
Speculating on alternative scenarios, Knowles suggests that had there been a more coherent and gracious candidate, the election results might not have significantly changed.
6. Affirming Trump's Mandate
Concluding his analysis, Knowles asserts that Trump's victory was a clear mandate from the American people, dismissing Harris' concession as unnecessary and indicative of manipulated circumstances.
He expresses confidence in Trump's ability to lead, stating, "Joy cometh in the morning." [05:10]
In this episode, Michael Knowles delivers a vehement critique of Kamala Harris' concession speech, challenging both the timing and the sincerity behind it. He posits that the Democratic campaign's narrative against Trump was fundamentally flawed and suggests that the election results reflect a genuine preference for Trump's leadership. Knowles' analysis underscores a broader skepticism towards the current Democratic Party's strategies and their portrayal of political adversaries.
Notable Quotes:
This summary aims to provide an insightful overview of Michael Knowles' perspectives on Kamala Harris' concession speech for those who have not listened to the episode.