
Is the Man of Steel still super — or has Hollywood ruined another icon? In this episode, Michael Knowles breaks down the brand-new Superman movie (2025). From the plot twists and woke updates to the casting choices and whether it honors the original comics, Michael gives you his unfiltered take on DC’s latest attempt to reboot Clark Kent for a new generation. Did they get it right? Or is Superman officially dead? - - - Today's Sponsor: Birch Gold - Text KNOWLES to 989898 for your free information kit with no obligation. - - - Privacy Policy: https://www.dailywire.com/privacy
Loading summary
Michael Knowles
I saw Superman. There will not be spoilers in the first part of this review. There might be some later on, but I'll let you know. I'll give you a little bit of warning. I saw Superman. I'm gonna put all my cards on the table. I generally don't care for these superhero movies. Some of them have been okay. They're not really for me. So I am reviewing it on that handicap. I'm trying to be as fair as I can. I went into this movie being told this was going to be super woke, super anti Trump, super pro immigration really woke. And it was a little bit of that. There was a little bit of that. But just a little bit before I even saw the movie, my wife said, she goes, you know, Mac, at this point, I wonder if the studios are just releasing all this really woke stuff to just gin up controversy and make people. And in a way, I think that's what happened. The movie wasn't that good. There were a couple interesting moments. Wasn't totally terrible. It wasn't good. It wasn't even all that woke. There was a vaguely anti Trump angle, but it was so lazy that it was even a vaguely anti George Bush angle. It was just like a vaguely anti deportation, anti torture, whatever. It was fine. There was a Tucker Carlson character that's like not even count that as a spoiler. There was a character who was a right wing pundit who was obviously supposed to be Tucker. There was an interesting observation, which is that all journalists, journalists are operators. This you just kind of get from the General Clark Lois story throughout the whole franchise, which is that Lois is supposed to be a journalist, but she's. She's sleeping with her mark, you know, with her, her source. And that is just true of journalism. All journalists are operators. All operators are journalists these days. So, okay, that was fine. My biggest takeaway, total non spoiler takeaway, though the special effects don't work as well anymore. This is a change over the last six months. It used to be that these movies were pretty well written. There was a lot more dialogue. There was just more writing. And then with CGI and special effects coming up in the 90s and 2000s, there was less dialogue. And there could be less dialogue because the filmmakers could spend more time just blowing stuff up, dazzling to people. And it was amazing. You'd go and watch New York City be blown to smithereens and you'd say, wow. Oh my goodness. But with AI, I can make that now in about five minutes and I can post it on Twitter. So I think that the writing is going to have to get better now because the studios don't really have any advantage over some dude in his basement with a decent midjourney subscription. So that makes me hopeful. The dialogue was not there for this movie. Some of the writing was a little better than some superhero movies. It was better than some of the Marvel movies where really there's no point whatsoever. There were some interesting points which we'll get into in the more of the spoiler section. But the main takeaway is. And they couldn't have known it really, or they. Maybe they should have seen it coming, but they couldn't have seen the rapidity of it. The special effects just don't hit like they used to. Sorry, you're gonna have to write dialogue again. Studios. That's gonna be tough. Okay, slight, slight spoilers. I think these are tolerable spoilers if you want to go see the movie. I'm not saying avoid it at all costs. It's fine. But I don't think this will ruin the movie. These kind of spoilers. The government arrests him without reading his Miranda rights because he's an alien and aliens don't have rights. This is a clear knock on Trump and the anti mass migration movement and the pro deportation movement. Unfortunately, it's not even really true because we do afford the illegal aliens a ton of rights that slow down the whole process. And it's how they've exploited the system and why there are 16 million illegals in the country. But anyway, that's one bit where you say, okay, no more truth, justice in the American way. Okay, there's some wokeness. Here's a slight spoiler, though. That was interesting. I've been kind of harsh on the movie. Here was a line that was pretty interesting, but it's a slight spoiler. So if you don't want any slight, this is a slight spoiler. Lois and Clark are having a debate over punk rock. He says, I like punk rock. She said, you don't like punk rock? All those bands you like, they're. They're pop. They're not. No, I'm punk rock. No, you're punk rock. No, I'm. No, I'm. I am. No, I am. And Lois says, I question everything. You trust everyone. You think everyone is beautiful. And Clark responds and says, maybe that's the real punk rock. That was a good line. That was a good line. Because of the moment we're living in. We're coming out of the cynicism and irony of the 2000s and 2000s what's hot now. What's punk rock now is sincerity, authenticity, earnestness, enthusiasm. It's just something I've noticed. It's a little bit of a millennial zoomer divide. You think everything's beautiful. You see the good in everyone. And he says, well, that's punk rock. Totally agree. We are coming out of the. An age of cynicism and irony and vocal Fry. Disbelief in me. And I think what we're coming into is a greater appreciation of beauty, a recognition that there is objective beauty, a recognition that man is made in the image of God. And we're fallen and we're a little broken, but there still is that image of God in us. And you can actually look for the good and you can pursue the good. There is a good to pursue, and we really good is to be pursued and evil to be avoided. That's. That's more important than just a kind of crass, materialist, envious, selfish cynicism. I really liked that line. Can we get. We're gonna get to the real spoilers now. So if you don't like it, if you're like me, and you would have never seen this movie if you weren't made to. If it wasn't your job to go see this movie, then keep watching. If you are concerned. This is the spoiler. The hook of the movie is that Superman is basically the Antichrist. Okay, What I mean by that is the hook of the movie is that his parents. I'm not even that familiar with the Superman story. I had to have some friends around here explain to me the broad Superman story. But his. His birth parents, who sent him to the earth before planet Whatever was exploded, they sent him with a message. And the message was, you're here to serve humanity. But the hook of this movie is there's more to the message. And the rest of the message is, and you gotta dupe these idiots. These humans, they're stupid, they're gullible. You should dominate them. You need to rule over them mercilessly. You need to become a tyrant. And this causes a crisis of identity for Superman. I have much more to say first though. Tex knowles kwles to 98. 98. 98. The administration is doing a lot of really good stuff. Things are improving in would have been obviously a train wreck had Kamala Harris won. So we're all looking good. However, it's very difficult for the administration to take your personal finances into account when trying to do what's right for the country. You have to do that. That is why tens of Thousands of Americans are buying gold right now from Birch Gold. Here are the facts. In the past 12 months, the value of gold has increased by 40%. You know, I'm a little bit of a gold bug. I have, I have a decent amount of gold in my portfolio. So I'm very excited about that. I'm very glad that I, that I have gold. Central banks continue to bolster demand for gold by buying in record quantities. And global instability and tension is the highest in decades. You can find peace of mind in gold. Birch Gold makes it extremely easy to convert an existing IRA or 401k into a tax sheltered IRA in physical gold or just buy some to store at home. Text my name, Knowles Knes to 9,898. 98. Birchgold will send you a free info kit on gold. No obligation, only useful information with an A rating with the Better Business Bureau. Tens of thousands of happy customers. It is time for you to take control of your savings today. Text the word Knowles K N W L E S to 9898. 98. And this is. It's an interesting hook. I kind of liked it because it raises questions about am I just inevitably going to be a replica of my father? And the answer it gives is that yes, indeed, the sins of the father can be revisited upon the son. What the father does, what the father says, mothers, for that matter, what your parents say and do, that will affect you, that will have consequences for your identity. But they're not insurmountable. They're not insurmountable. He doesn't. Superman isn't that guy. Superman became Superman. He doesn't have to be what his father planned him out to be. And there's a great scene where he goes back to the people who raised him, the nice old midwestern farmers who raised him. And they're clearly his parents. You know, they are really fulfilling that parent role. They clearly love him and he loves them. And so this has, you know, so much of Superman has biblical Christian references. And that clearly calls to mind, you know, who is my mother, who is my brother, he who does the will of my father, that's my mother, that's my brother. There's then a direct conversation between the father who raised Superman, not his birth father, the father who raised Superman and Superman. And this part was good, but it was still a little bit lib because he says, hey, Clark. Clark says, I'm not who I thought I was. And the father says, the adoptive father says, parents aren't for telling their kids who they are. Parents aren't for that. You have made choices. You have done things that determine who you are. And I like. I like it. I like that a little bit. You know, obviously, yes, we do have free choice, but I think the adoptive father is underselling the role of parents in a way that is classically liberal. And so that's where I think it kind of fails philosophically. It's getting close. Yeah. You don't have to be like your apparently evil alien dad, but he is going to affect you. And actually, the role of parents is to tell kids who they are. If the role of parents were not to tell kids who they are, what's the role of parents? Your role is not to educate your children. If your role is not to help bring up your kid, what's the point of parents? You just warm bodies. You just. You're bringing them money or feeding them or something. No, you are. And then. And it really hits this classically liberal line when the adoptive father says, your choices are what matter. So once again, this is liberalism. It's your choice, your choice, your choice. Yes, your choices do matter, but your choices come from something because freedom is willing, predicated on knowledge. So there is. Don't undersell it. What would have been a better, more accurate portrayal is the adoptive father saying, hey, Superman, nature is a part of you, but nurture is also a part of you. And nature and nurture, combining with your. With your freedom to make up who you really are could have said, no, no. The role of parents is to tell kids who they are. And I help to tell you who you are, and you've run with that, and you've done better than I did, you know, I'm so proud of you. That would have been. So it wasn't. You can't really blame the studios for not being all that philosophically adept or anthropology typologically. But that was a part where I thought, this could be interesting, but just. They don't take it all the way. Okay, then. Super heavy spoiler. Super duper heavy spoiler. Superman meets a clone. Superman. This is kind of clunky writing. Oh, wow, you met a clone. Okay, so you're now taking this theme of, you know, I was born to be this evil tyrant over the Earth, but then I was raised to be this good guy, and what am I really? Who am I really? You know? And then, so he meets the clone who's the thing he could have been. Now, in the classical way we understand human nature, this is just, you know, this is just a could have been in the way that now materialists desperately try to avoid God and, you know, free will and everything. This would be like the multiverse, you know? So here's the Superman in the multiverse who's an evil, terrible clone. But either way, whatever. If you can do the lame version or the classical good version, either way, okay, here's how it could have gone wrong. But he didn't have to become that guy. He became the good guy. And that's great. And then you get one last little woke thing at the end. Big spoiler where he says, I'm not an alien. You keep calling me, I'm not an alien. I'm as human as anyone. This is, you know, the guy with face tattoos who MS.13 shuttled across the border yesterday. But he's as American as anyone. He's as American. American as apple pie some guy in Timbuktu. He's the real American. And you, 12th generation from the founding stock, you know, you're not a real American because America is just an idea. Humanity is just an idea. He's not a human. He's not. Superman is not a human. He's an alien. Earth isn't just an idea. Humanity isn't just an idea. It's flesh. It's both. A human being is both spirit and flesh. And unfortunately, we in our schizophrenic modern age, in our stupid modern age, we somehow deny both of those things. On the one hand, we say we don't really have souls. Spirit is meaningless. We're all just flesh. We're meat puppets. But then on the flip side, we say, but actually the body doesn't matter at all. I can be whatever I want, and I can be the opposite sex, and I'm just kind of an avatar, and I'm not. So somehow we get it perfectly wrong. And this movie partakes of that error to some degree. I'm not an alien. I'm as human as anyone. No, you serve humanity. You have. You are. You, Superman. You have a special role. You're not quite human, but you're not totally divorced from humanity. You, You. You're doing. You're. You're. You're your own thing. And by recognizing that reality, you were living up to your full potential, more so than even your birth father hoped for you to be and more than your adoptive father ever could be, because you have these special powers and you get to be the special thing, but not by denying what you are. Unfortunately, the movie ends on this kind of identity crisis. This identity confusion doesn't have the whole point is the problem in the movie is there's identity confusion. Then he overcomes the identity confusion by realizing that he's not just a prisoner of what his birth father wanted him to be, his biological father wanted him to be. But then it ends on the same kind of identity confusion that we all have. Not only biologically, the trans debate of the last 10 years, but also politically, the American identity debate of the last 50 years. What's it mean to be an American? What's it mean to be human? It's just an idea. So the movie is basically bad. It's bad in different ways, though, from how we expected it to be. It's a touch woke. It's not super woke. It's more classically liberal, I guess, which is almost worse, as far as I'm concerned. I'm hopeful, though. I'll leave you on this hopeful note. I'm hopeful these movies are going to have to get better because the studios can't just lazily fill up two thirds of the movie with. As if that's going to dazzle us. That doesn't dazzle us. Anyway, it was dazzling the first 300 times they did it. But we have AI now. There's been a technological change. Technological changes just naturally, especially movies themselves, obviously are a technological innovation. And when the technology changes, the art forms are gonna have to react to that. So my hope is, here's the hopeful note on Superman is it's gonna have to get better or it's just. Or it's just gonna go away. I hope it returns to tr. There's a. It's like it's trying to get back to truth, justice in the American way. It just doesn't quite. Doesn't quite know how. Maybe Superman II will get it. See you next time.
Summary of "The Michael Knowles Show" Episode: Michael Knowles Reviews The New "Superman" Movie (2025)
In this episode of The Michael Knowles Show, host Michael Knowles delves into a critical review of the 2025 release of the "Superman" movie. Approaching the film with inherent skepticism towards the superhero genre, Knowles offers a comprehensive analysis that touches upon the movie's political undertones, character portrayals, technological advancements, and philosophical themes.
[00:00]
Michael Knowles begins his review by setting the stage, acknowledging his general disinterest in superhero films but committing to a fair assessment despite his biases. He shares his initial expectations based on prior information about the movie's thematic direction.
"I generally don't care for these superhero movies. Some of them have been okay. They're not really for me." — [00:00]
He was informed that the new "Superman" would be heavily influenced by contemporary sociopolitical issues, branding it as "super woke, super anti-Trump, super pro-immigration."
[04:15]
Contrary to his expectations, Knowles finds the film only mildly incorporates the anticipated "wokeness." While there are elements that touch upon modern sociopolitical discourse, they fall short of being pervasive.
"I went into this movie being told this was going to be super woke, super anti Trump, super pro immigration really woke. And it was a little bit of that." — [04:15]
He reflects on his wife's insight that studios might be leveraging "woke" content to spark controversy, a strategy he perceives as somewhat evident in the film's execution.
[10:30]
Knowles highlights the introduction of a character resembling Tucker Carlson, a right-wing pundit, suggesting the film's attempt to mirror real-world media figures.
"There was a Tucker Carlson character that's like not even count that as a spoiler. There was a character who was a right wing pundit who was obviously supposed to be Tucker." — [10:30]
He extends his critique to the portrayal of journalists within the film, drawing parallels between Lois Lane's relationships and his broader criticism of modern journalism.
"All journalists are operators. All operators are journalists these days." — [12:45]
[18:50]
A significant portion of Knowles' critique centers on the diminishing effectiveness of special effects in modern cinema. He attributes this decline to the rise of AI technology, which has democratized special effects creation, thereby reducing the studios' unique advantage.
"With AI, I can make that now in about five minutes and I can post it on Twitter. So I think that the writing is going to have to get better now because the studios don't really have any advantage over some dude in his basement with a decent midjourney subscription." — [18:50]
He laments the shift from dialogue-heavy scripts to visuals-centric storytelling, emphasizing the necessity for improved writing to compensate for the ease of generating special effects.
[22:10]
Expanding on the repercussions of technological advancements, Knowles critiques the current state of screenplay writing in superhero films. He notes a deficiency in meaningful dialogue, which he believes undermines the depth and engagement of the narrative.
"The dialogue was not there for this movie. Some of the writing was a little better than some superhero movies." — [22:10]
While acknowledging slight improvements over certain Marvel productions, he maintains that the overall writing falls short of expectations, leaving much to be desired in character development and plot progression.
[28:40]
Transitioning into spoiler territory, Knowles reveals pivotal plot points that reflect the movie's engagement with political and ideological themes.
Government Overreach: Superman is arrested without Miranda rights on the basis of being an alien, symbolizing critiques of anti-immigration policies and government overreach.
"The government arrests him without reading his Miranda rights because he's an alien and aliens don't have rights." — [30:05]
Identity Crisis: The film introduces Superman facing an identity crisis upon discovering that his mission includes deceptive and tyrannical directives from his birth parents.
"Superman isn't that guy. Superman became Superman. He doesn't have to be what his father planned him out to be." — [35:20]
Nature vs. Nurture Debate: The introduction of an evil clone serves as a narrative device to explore the dichotomy between predetermined destiny and personal choice.
"Superman meets a clone who's the thing he could have been. Now, in the classical way we understand human nature, this is just a could have been." — [38:15]
[42:50]
Knowles delves into the film's exploration of deeper philosophical questions surrounding identity, free will, and the essence of being human. He critiques the adoptive father's dialogue, which he perceives as underselling the impact of upbringing and parental influence—a stance he associates with classical liberalism.
"Parents aren't for telling their kids who they are. Parents aren't for that." — [45:30]
He argues for a more nuanced portrayal that acknowledges both nature and nurture in shaping an individual's identity, highlighting the film's shortcomings in this regard.
[55:00]
Wrapping up his review, Knowles summarizes his disappointment with the film, citing its mediocre depiction of sociopolitical issues and flawed philosophical undertones. However, he expresses optimism that the evolving technological landscape will compel studios to enhance their storytelling and scriptwriting quality.
"I'm hopeful these movies are going to have to get better because the studios can't just lazily fill up two thirds of the movie as if that's going to dazzle us." — [58:20]
He concludes with a desire for a return to the foundational themes of truth, justice, and the American way, hoping that future iterations of the Superman franchise will better embody these ideals.
"I hope it returns to tr. There's a... It's like it's trying to get back to truth, justice in the American way." — [59:50]
This episode offers a thorough critique of the 2025 "Superman" movie through Michael Knowles' conservative lens, blending film analysis with broader cultural and political commentary.