
President Trump has just announced a full-scale, successful bombing campaign on Iran’s nuclear facilities, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. Michael Knowles gives his unfiltered reaction to one of the most consequential military moves in modern history. What does this mean for America, Israel, and the future of the Middle East? - - - Privacy Policy: https://www.dailywire.com/privacy
Loading summary
Narrator
The global phenomenon, the Chosen, the series that has captured audiences around the world, has arrived with its most powerful season yet. The table is set. The final hours are approaching. Every moment, every struggle, every sacrifice has led to this. Loyalties will be tested, pushed to the edge of faith and trust. Friendships will be questioned, challenged and shaken by uncertainty and doubt. Alliances will be broken. Families will be divided, and nothing will ever be the same again. It's a journey of faith, doubt, hope, transformation and love. Experience the incredible story of one unforgettable night that changed the course of history forever. You are about to witness a story so profound, it did not just change lives, it changed the world. Do not miss the exciting new season, the Chosen Last Supper. Season 5 is now streaming on Prime Video.
Political Analyst
Sorry to interrupt, everybody. Saturday evening, though, if you're watching this, then your evening was probably already interrupted. For those who haven't caught the news, President Trump has ordered an American attack on Iranian nuclear sites. The United States Navigation is now directly and officially engaged in the war in Iran. These are the president's words. We have completed our very successful attack on the three nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. All planes are now outside of Iran airspace. A full payload of bombs was dropped on the primary site, Fordo. That's the one that everyone's been talking about in the last week. All planes are safely on their way home. Congratulations to our great American warriors. There is not another military in the world that could have done this. Now is the time for peace. Thank you for your attention to this matter. There are going to be plenty of conservatives who are thrilled about this who wanted to engage directly with Iran. But there are going to be a lot of conservatives, maybe even more, who are not so happy with this news because I think there are a lot of people who, even though we wanted to take out Iran's nuclear weapons, or rather we didn't want Iran to develop nuclear weapons, we were just kind of hoping the Israelis would take care of it and we would not have to be bogged down in another war in the Middle East. I'm sure President Trump. Trump doesn't want to be bogged down in another war in the Middle East. That is why he says now is the time for peace. Don't retaliate. However, a lot of us, you know, with the memories of Iraq and Afghanistan say anytime the prospect of the US In Mideastern war comes up, we say, well, this is no good. We don't want it. I get it.
Narrator
I get it.
Political Analyst
I've expressed those Opinions myself. President Trump has expressed those opinions on the campaign trail. However, I think the big takeaway from this decision is no one should be surprised by it. No one should be surprised by it. One, because President Trump for 10 years now has said he will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. And he said that repeatedly in his old campaigns, in his most recent campaign. So if people are suggesting that they voted for him because they didn't want the prospect of war in Iran, then they weren't listening because he said it a lot. He's been very consistent on that. Two, the other reason why this could have been expected is one, Trump, even in the first term, was not totally a dove. One of his biggest foreign policy moves was to take out the top Iranian general, Qassem Soleimani. On top of that, he dropped the Moab, famously. But he pursued a policy that he calls peace through strength, coming from Ronald Reagan. So most of the time, he doesn't want to intervene in the affairs around the world, or most of the time, he doesn't want to intervene in the wars around the world. But in order to have the credible threat of violence, sometimes you actually have to do it. You can't just bluff all the time. But the third reason that I think people should not be surprised by this attack tonight is a little line hidden in some of the reporting that's now coming out of the Pentagon about this attack, namely the way the attack was carried out. All day, people who have been tracking this stuff were tracking B2 bombers that were being sent into the Pacific, reportedly into Guam. From Guam, the B2 stealth bombers could fly over Iran and hit the target. So people have been waiting for this all day, really. We've been waiting for it for all week and even longer. However, one little line in the reporting says that the weapons that were dropped on the Fordo facility were designed specifically with Fordo in mind. In other words, the United States has been preparing for this military action a lot longer than the past few weeks and a lot longer than the recent war in Israel and the Middle east, and a lot longer than this Trump administration, and maybe a lot longer even than the first Trump administration, because we discovered the fordo facility in 2009 or earlier. It became. It came to the international attention in 2009. US intelligence probably knew of it much, much earlier than that, which is why, whatever you feel about this, I think people are totally right to have trepidation about the United States becoming directly involved in another war in the Middle East. I, I share that concern. I don't know that I'm not one of the people who is jubilant tonight. I'm glad that the American servicemen are now out of Iranian airspace. I'm glad that Iran will not develop a nuclear weapon anytime soon. I'm glad that President Trump launched a successful military operation. But I'm not dancing for joy in the streets here. I have a lot of trepidation about what comes next, which at this point now I think it's safe to conclude the most likely outcome probably is regime change in Iran, with the Ayatollah down in a bunker somewhere and his chief means of protecting himself blown to smithereens. But I'm not shocked. I'm not surprised. I'm not pulling my hair out or anything like that. I usually am not in politics because if you're paying attention, you see how these things are going. President Trump has been signaling for weeks at this point that he was prepared to use military action. But this goes deeper than Trump. There are grand strategic operations and objectives that are in place much longer than any one administration. And we can bewail that and we can lament that and we can say that's undemocratic, but that's how nations operate. And so tonight's attack was not just a spur of the moment thing. It's not, as the left wing critics, or even maybe some of Trump's critics on the right are going to suggest, some, you know, reflexive maneuver because I don't know, he ate a bad taco bowl at Trump Tower that day and felt like bombing a country. That's not what's going on. The attack this evening has been in the works for a very, very long time. It is in line. It happens to be in line with President Trump's strategic vision. And it doesn't really come as much surprise. What comes next is another matter. President Trump will be addressing the nation tonight. So that's all for now. We'll see what President Trump has to say momentarily.
Advertiser
When's the last time you changed your air filter? Filtreat Brand is here to remind you that it's important to change it regularly to help keep your H Vac running smoothly and efficiently. Multiple factors can impact the life of your AC air filter, like pets, cooking and poor outdoor air quality. Filtreat MPR1900 air filters can help capture these unwanted microparticles, including bacteria and viruses circulating in your home's air. Change your filter today with Filtreat Brand.
Podcast Summary: The Michael Knowles Show - "Trump Bombs Iran: Michael Knowles Instant REACTION"
Episode Details
In this episode of The Michael Knowles Show, host Michael Knowles provides an immediate reaction to the dramatic escalation in U.S.-Iran relations following President Donald Trump's decisive military action against Iranian nuclear sites. The discussion delves into the implications of the attack, the consistency of Trump's foreign policy, and the broader strategic considerations at play.
Timestamp: [00:43]
Michael Knowles begins by addressing the unprecedented decision by President Trump to order an American attack on key Iranian nuclear facilities. He outlines the specifics of the operation, highlighting the successful bombing of three major sites: Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan. Knowles emphasizes the precision and effectiveness of the strike, noting:
"We have completed our very successful attack on the three nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan."
— Political Analyst [00:43]
Impact on Iran's Nuclear Capabilities
Knowles discusses the immediate impact of the attack, asserting that this move effectively halts Iran's progress toward developing nuclear weapons. He remarks:
"I'm glad that Iran will not develop a nuclear weapon anytime soon."
— Political Analyst [02:18]
Timestamp: [01:30]
The host explores the divided reaction among conservatives. While some are elated by the decisive action against Iran, others express apprehension about the potential for entering another prolonged conflict in the Middle East. Knowles explains:
"There are going to be a lot of conservatives, maybe even more, who are not so happy with this news because... we would not have to be bogged down in another war in the Middle East."
— Political Analyst [01:30]
He acknowledges the tension between the desire for strength and the fear of long-term military engagement:
"President Trump doesn't want to be bogged down in another war in the Middle East. That is why he says now is the time for peace. Don't retaliate."
— Political Analyst [01:30]
Timestamp: [02:18]
Knowles highlights President Trump's long-standing commitment to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, tracing this stance back to Trump's earlier campaigns:
"President Trump for 10 years now has said he will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon."
— Political Analyst [02:18]
He underscores the strategic consistency of Trump's actions, pointing out that the attack was not a spur-of-the-moment decision but rather a culmination of years of policy positioning:
"The attack this evening has been in the works for a very, very long time. It is in line with President Trump's strategic vision."
— Political Analyst [04:00]
Timestamp: [03:15]
Delving deeper into the strategic implications, Knowles discusses the likely outcomes of the strike, including the possibility of regime change in Iran:
"The most likely outcome probably is regime change in Iran, with the Ayatollah down in a bunker somewhere and his chief means of protecting himself blown to smithereens."
— Political Analyst [03:15]
He also addresses the broader strategic operations beyond Trump's administration, suggesting that such military actions are part of long-term national strategies:
"There are grand strategic operations and objectives that are in place much longer than any one administration."
— Political Analyst [04:00]
Timestamp: [03:50]
Knowles reflects on the mixed public sentiments, acknowledging both support and concern within the conservative base. He emphasizes the complexity of public opinion, where the desire for strong action coexists with the fear of extended military entanglement:
"I have a lot of trepidation about what comes next... I'm glad that the American servicemen are now out of Iranian airspace."
— Political Analyst [03:50]
Timestamp: [04:00]
As the episode nears its end, Knowles anticipates President Trump's upcoming address to the nation, signaling that further details and implications of the attack will be discussed imminently. He leaves listeners with a sense of cautious optimism tempered by realistic apprehensions about future developments.
"President Trump will be addressing the nation tonight. So that's all for now. We'll see what President Trump has to say momentarily."
— Political Analyst [04:00]
Decisive Military Action: President Trump's attack on Iranian nuclear sites marks a significant escalation in U.S.-Iran relations, aimed at halting Iran's nuclear ambitions.
Conservative Division: The move has elicited mixed reactions within the conservative community, balancing support for strong action against fears of prolonged conflict.
Strategic Consistency: The attack aligns with Trump's long-standing foreign policy objectives, showcasing a consistent approach to preventing nuclear proliferation in the Middle East.
Future Implications: Potential regime change in Iran and the broader strategic objectives suggest long-term impacts that extend beyond the current administration.
Upcoming Developments: President Trump's imminent address will likely provide further insights and outline the next steps in this unfolding situation.
"We have completed our very successful attack on the three nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan."
— Political Analyst [00:43]
"I'm glad that Iran will not develop a nuclear weapon anytime soon."
— Political Analyst [02:18]
"President Trump for 10 years now has said he will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon."
— Political Analyst [02:18]
"The attack this evening has been in the works for a very, very long time. It is in line with President Trump's strategic vision."
— Political Analyst [04:00]
"The most likely outcome probably is regime change in Iran, with the Ayatollah down in a bunker somewhere and his chief means of protecting himself blown to smithereens."
— Political Analyst [03:15]
"There are grand strategic operations and objectives that are in place much longer than any one administration."
— Political Analyst [04:00]
"President Trump will be addressing the nation tonight. So that's all for now. We'll see what President Trump has to say momentarily."
— Political Analyst [04:00]
Note: This summary excludes promotional content and advertisements, focusing solely on the substantive discussion surrounding President Trump's military action against Iran and its broader implications.