The Monopoly Report: Episode 34 – Jonathan Kanter on Digital Media & Ad Tech
Released on June 18, 2025
Hosts and Guests:
- Host: Alan Chappelle
- Guest: Jonathan Kanter, former Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division, Department of Justice (DOJ)
Introduction
In Episode 34 of The Monopoly Report, host Alan Chappelle engages in an insightful conversation with Jonathan Kanter, the former Assistant Attorney General who spearheaded the DOJ's antitrust trials against Google during the Biden administration. This episode delves deep into the complexities of big tech's antitrust challenges, focusing specifically on Google's search and ad tech practices.
Overview of Antitrust Trials Against Google
The discussion begins with a continuation from Part One of the interview, where Chappelle and Kanter explore the broader implications of antitrust laws before zeroing in on the specifics of the Google search antitrust case.
Key Points:
- Jonathan Kanter’s Role: Kanter led the DOJ's antitrust actions against Google, addressing concerns about market dominance and anti-competitive practices.
- Antitrust Principles: Emphasis on legal foundations over market engineering, ensuring that remedies are rooted in law enforcement rather than subjective market outcomes.
Notable Quote:
"This is an exercise in law enforcement. Someone breaks the law, they should be held accountable." — Jonathan Kanter [00:34]
Remedies in the Ad Tech Case
A significant portion of the episode focuses on the remediative measures proposed and implemented in the ad tech case against Google.
Key Points:
- Structural Remedies: Kanter emphasizes the importance of structural remedies that prevent Google from re-establishing monopolistic practices.
- Forward-Looking Solutions: Remedies are designed to be adaptable to technological advancements and market changes.
- Minimizing Public Risk: Ensuring that the burden of implementing remedies falls on the violating entity, not the public.
Notable Quote:
"Denouncing the monopolist the fruits of the violation, preventing recurrence, the need for forward-looking remedies…" — Jonathan Kanter [03:09]
The Role of Third-Party Experts
Kanter highlights the necessity of incorporating industry and technical expertise into antitrust enforcement to adequately understand and address market complexities.
Key Points:
- Interdisciplinary Approach: Combining economic principles with technical and industry-specific knowledge.
- Expert Collaboration: Building a network of in-house and external experts to inform DOJ strategies and remedies.
Notable Quote:
"Economists are very important… but they're not a substitute for technical experts and industry experts who actually know how things work." — Jonathan Kanter [06:50]
Divestment Process and Challenges
The conversation delves into the intricacies of divestment as a remedial action, particularly when dealing with loss leaders within a monopolistic entity.
Key Points:
- Valuation Difficulties: Challenges in accurately valuing assets that serve as loss leaders for the monopolist.
- Broader Divestitures: Necessity to possibly expand divestitures beyond problematic assets or pair them with behavioral remedies.
- Enhancing Asset Attractiveness: Encouraging divestiture by making the assets more appealing to potential buyers when resistance is met.
Notable Quote:
"If something is a loss leader, then probably the divestiture needs to either be broader… or flanked by behavioral remedies." — Jonathan Kanter [08:25]
Specific Remedial Proposals
Chappelle and Kanter discuss particular remedies proposed by the DOJ, such as placing DFP funds in escrow and restricting Google's use of first-party data.
Key Points:
- Escrow Accounts for Publishers: Proposed to aid publishers during the transition away from Google's dominant platforms.
- Data Usage Restrictions: Limiting Google's access to first-party data to prevent misuse and ensure fair competition.
- Principles-Based Remedies: Ensuring that remedies are adaptable and based on clear principles to allow for flexibility and adjustment as needed.
Notable Quote:
"Data is so key… it would be irresponsible not to consider how it's used in the context of a remedy." — Jonathan Kanter [13:27]
Broader Implications and Future Cases
The episode touches upon the potential for future antitrust actions against other Google platforms, such as AdMob and YouTube, and the global coordination required in regulating multinational tech giants.
Key Points:
- Comprehensive Approach: Addressing all facets of Google's market influence, including mobile ad platforms and video services.
- International Coordination: Collaborating with global regulatory bodies to effectively manage the transnational nature of big tech companies.
- Precedent Setting: Establishing legal principles that will guide future antitrust enforcement against other large tech entities.
Notable Quote:
"Our analysis would start and end with what is in the best interest of the public, which was our client." — Jonathan Kanter [19:42]
Conclusion
The episode concludes with reflections on the challenges and responsibilities of enforcing antitrust laws in the rapidly evolving digital landscape. Kanter underscores the importance of adaptable, principle-based remedies and the ongoing need for vigilance to prevent monopolistic abuses.
Final Thoughts:
- Evolving Remedies: Antitrust remedies must remain flexible to address unforeseen consequences and market shifts.
- Public Interest Focus: Ensuring that all actions taken by enforcement agencies prioritize the public's best interests.
- Continued Oversight: Anticipating future legal actions as Google and similar companies adapt to regulatory pressures.
Notable Quote:
"You did it our way." — Alan Chappelle [21:17]
Key Takeaways
- Legal Foundations Over Market Engineering: Remedies should be firmly rooted in antitrust laws rather than subjective market manipulations.
- Interdisciplinary Expertise is Crucial: Incorporating technical and industry knowledge is essential for effective antitrust enforcement.
- Flexible and Principled Remedies: Ensuring that remedies are adaptable and based on clear principles to address dynamic market conditions.
- Global Coordination Required: Addressing the global footprint of big tech companies necessitates collaboration with international regulatory bodies.
- Public Interest is Paramount: All enforcement actions should prioritize the public's best interests, ensuring fair competition and preventing monopolistic dominance.
Subscribe to The Monopoly Report for more in-depth analyses of antitrust issues affecting the global advertising economy. Stay informed by subscribing to the weekly newsletter at monopoly.report.com or listen to more episodes on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, YouTube, and other major platforms.