Loading summary
A
Go to any family or professional gathering these days and there's a good chance you'll be in a room with someone who's used medicinal cannabis for anxiety, physical pain or hundreds of other conditions that have been treated legally with the product for the last 10 years. I'm Samantha Salinger Morris and you're listening to the Morning Edition from the Age and the Sydney Morning Herald. Today, health reporter Angus Thompson on the Australian researchers who have found that there is no evidence that medicinal cannabis is effective at treating anxiety, depression and PTSD. And those who are angry at the result. It's March 18th. Okay, Angus, can you just start off by telling us how many medical conditions are people using cannabis to treat? And has this been increasingly popular over the years? You know, like, how are people using this?
B
Yeah, well, Sam, it's a milestone year for medicinal cannabis in Australia. It's been 10 years since it was legalised for medicinal and scientific use. It's been a long road. But from March next year, doctors can
A
legally prescribe medicinal cannabis.
C
This is a process and a product that we need to bring to the Australian people. Turnbull government is proposing to allow patients and their doctor access to a safe, legal and reliable supply of medical cannabis medicinal cannabis products. Today's legislation has been described as a landmark bill and the missing piece for patients and doctors around Australia.
B
And since then we've seen more and more Australians legally use medicinal cannabis through these two schemes which basically allow doctors to prescribe products that haven't gone through the rigorous testing needed to to be classified as an approved medicine. And doctors have to record the reasons why they prescribe medicinal cannabis. And so we know that there are more than 250health conditions that people are using cannabis to treat. And some of the most common ones are chronic pain, anxiety, insomnia and a bunch of other mental health conditions such as depression and ptsd.
A
That is so fascinating. And do we know whether the majority of people who are using cannabis to treat various conditions, are they mostly self prescribing or are they actually going to doctors to get it?
B
They're going to doctors. I mean, people self medicating with cannabis to treat all sorts of conditions isn't new. It's obviously an ancient plant, it's been around for a very long time and humans have been using it for a very long time. The difference now is that we actually have numbers that show how many people are using it and why they're using it. The other difference is these products are really different from the cannabis you might get off the street. So these are Grown products. They're grown by experts and backed by big companies that have millions of dollars to put into research and development to essentially produce high quality and high strength cannabis products. And there's just a huge range of products out there, whether it's oils or flowers or or creams that you rub. There's so many ways that people can access this product.
A
Okay, but you have just written about a new study. This was just published in Lancet Psychiatry on Tuesday, and it has thrown, I would say, a pretty big question mark over the use of cannabis to treat various ailments. So tell us about this study. What did it say?
B
This study, Sam, was from researchers at the University of Sydney and it looked at more than 50 randomized control trials test the effectiveness of medicinal cannabis to treat mental health and substance use disorders. Specifically, these studies involved about two and a half thousand participants, so quite a large group. And it looked at a range of conditions. So the review found no evidence that cannabis was effective for treating anxiety, depression and post traumatic stress disorder, ptsd. There was some evidence that cannabis could help reduce tic severity for people with Tourette's syndrome, increase for people with insomnia, and help manage autism traits in people with cocaine use disorder. Cannabis actually increased cravings, but overall, the researchers cautioned that the quality of studies included in the review was quite low. So we can't exactly draw conclusive evidence from this study, but it does add to the evidence and the constantly updated evidence that we need perhaps more research into these before we can say whether or not they are effective at a population level.
A
And so I've got to ask you, Angus, is this finding a surprising and B, going to anger anyone?
B
It's not particularly surprising on you. I think these kind of systematic reviews of medicinal cannabis studies have been around and there's been many of them for many years. This study was somewhat unique in the sense that it looked at a range of mental health and substance use conditions. But it again highlights a really important point, which is that there is just not much research into medicinal cannabis, which is somewhat surprising given it has been legalized and regulated for decades in some countries. I think California first legalized medicinal marijuana in the 90s. So it has been around for a while and yet there's just not much research into especially these mental health conditions which make up such a large proportion of the reasons why it's being prescribed. In terms of who is angry, I think this kind of study would really frustrate those people out there who have found medicinal cannabis to be useful to treat their conditions. And the authors have acknowledged that people do experience benefits from them, but for whatever reason, we just aren't seeing that bearing out in population wide gold standard clinical trials. There was also some frustration among experts that I spoke to that these types of reviews distract from what they think we should be doing, which is funding new clinical trials to understand more about how these drugs work rather than looking at trials that have been around for
A
years after the break.
B
Well, I think the difficulty with having a lack of research, Sam, is that we don't know for sure whether what the harms could be. There is perhaps less risk to it. But I don't want to say there's no harms involved because there could be really serious harms that we don't know about because it hasn't been studied.
A
And another really fascinating part of the feature that you've just written about, this was a young father who you spoke to. He's living in Darwin and he is an example, I guess, of what can go wrong if you become a habitual cannabis user. So tell us about his experience.
B
That's right. So I spoke to Daniel Yakuel. He's a young dad living in Darwin and he was prescribed medicinal cannabis about two years ago to help him deal with anxiety and depression following a relationship breakdown. So he had smoked marijuana recreationally in the past, but he found himself going more reliant on the legal product, which was far more potent than what he'd dealt with before. And he said anytime he wasn't at work he'd be using it. And at the peak, he was consuming 60 grams of cannabis a month, which is quite a large amount. He was spending more on his cannabis prescription per week than his $300 rent. So the cost and the realization that he was slipping into dependency really were the things that he that motivated him to get off it. And he has been off cannabis now for four months. He said he's found his mental health has improved, his emotions are more regulated and he's getting better quality sleep and actually, interestingly, dreaming vivid apparently. He was telling me that when you use cannabis regularly, you don't dream as much, but he's found that his dreams are coming back and more vivid. And he said that it's probably one of the best decisions that he's ever made. So he's one out of many people who use it. Obviously there is a spectrum of people that use it and they all experience different things. But that was one case where he really benefited from coming off it and had noticed that he was getting an addiction growing dependent on this particular product,
A
which is so interesting, given that you said before, that, you know, people use cannabis to treat substance abuse. Anyway, that's just a fascinating element to this. But I really want to ask you, like, how is it that there have been very few trials in the safety and effectiveness of cannabis and yet at the same time, we've got more and more Australians legally using medicinal cannabis through what you've, you know, spoken about, which is the Special Access Scheme, which is a pathway that essentially allows doctors to prescribe products that haven't gone through the rigorous testing needed to be classified as an approved medicine. Like, is this a problem?
B
Well, there's a couple of things that are quite unique about medicinal cannabis in Australia. And so it was legalised, as we said, in 2016, and the way that it has been made accessible to people is through this Special Access scheme, which basically allows doctors to prescribe unapproved products. So these are products that haven't been through really rigorous clinical trials to people who have a justification for using it. So through that pathway, hundreds of thousands, almost a million Australians have been prescribed cannabis. And so that has resulted in a big industry cropping up around, particularly around telehealth and these vertically integrated clinics where you go online, you speak to a doctor, they consult, you recommend medicinal cannabis, then that same company distributes you the cannabis and then you get it mailed to you or such. So that has been a big boon for some of these companies and it has also raised questions with regulators about how to regulate this new industry that is making cannabis so accessible to Australians. The other thing is that clinical trials are really, really expensive. I think Ian McGregor, who, he's a psychopharmacologist at the University of Sydney, he said these trials can cost anywhere between 3 to 10 million dollars to do. And he was saying that there isn't that much incentive for these companies to invest in these trials because they're already making money and they're already got quite small margins on prescribing medicinal cannabis to Australians. And it's growing exponentially, almost it's tripled in the last four years. So there's not much financial incentive for the private sector to invest in these kind of trials. And so that's where he and others have argued for other people to step in, whether that's the government or philanthropy. So it's a factor of two things. It's. It's the fact that clinical trials are really expensive and that there is not a lot of motivation for people to invest in them.
A
And, you know, you've written that legal cannabis sales have tripled in Australia in the last four years. But Ian McGregor, who you've just mentioned, a professor of psychopharmacology, he told you, you know, that research hasn't kept pace with prescribing rates. So I'm just wondering, how is this affecting treatment outcomes for patients ultimately?
B
Well, I think the bottom line is that it doesn't give people who are prescribed medicinal cannabis the overarching evidence or confidence that it will work for them. So a lot of it is their relationship with their doctor, their sort of process of trial and error and how it works for them. The good news with these kind of products, which I think is good to note from this study. The study found that medicinal cannabis products were associated with a greater risk of adverse events. So these are things like headaches and nausea, but it wasn't actually. It didn't lead to very serious adverse events, things like hospitalisations, psychotic episodes. So that's comforting to know that these products aren't necessarily unsafe in that sense of, you know, leading to serious outcomes, but it does leave patients and people using these products having to fend for themselves a little bit without overarching really strong evidence that it. It is actually effective.
A
And so is the upshot, do you think, after looking into this area, that cannabis is unlikely to really hurt someone in a serious way, like hospitalizing them? And therefore, even if it's not particularly effective to treat, say, depression or PTSD or anorexia or a number of the conditions that it's being sort of prescribed for, that really, people are unlikely to get hurt and at best, maybe there'll be a placebo effect.
B
Well, I think the difficulty with having a lack of research, Sam, is that we don't know for sure whether what the harms could be, especially when you look over a population level. Certainly there are drugs in the literature. Obviously, cannabis has been legal for medicinal use for a relatively short period, but there has been a lot of studies of drug use recreationally as well. And certainly cannabis, marijuana is much lower down that scale of. Of drugs that harm, which is a lot, by and large, alcohol and things like cocaine and methamphetamine. So there is perhaps less risk to it. But I don't want to say. Yeah, I don't want to say that it. There's no harms involved because there could be really serious harms that we don't know about because it hasn't been studied.
A
And, Angus, just to wrap up, can you tell us about the draft bill that the New South Wales government might soon be releasing, which might really have an impact in this area.
B
Yeah. So, Sam, this week we're expecting the New South Wales government to release a draft bill that lays out their plans to amend New South Wales driving laws to create an exemption for people with medicinal cannabis prescriptions who aren't impaired while they're driving. Obviously, in rural areas of New South Wales and Australia in general, this is a big issue because there's a lack of public transport and people rely on their cars every day. So this is a really big issue for people. It's also a big issue for people who might be considering using medicinal cannabis who aren't taking that leap because they need to be able to drive. And so I think all this goes to the fact that we need really rigorous evidence based trials into this medication and whether it works or whether it doesn't, what conditions it works for and which conditions it might be less effective for.
A
Well, it's fascinating space on this 10 year milestone of the legalization here. So thank you so much, Angus, for your time time.
B
Thanks for having me, Sam.
A
And in other news today, with the Reserve bank hiking interest rates yesterday to 4.1%, new data shows many Australian homeowners prepared for the increase by pouring record amounts into offset counts. Four time F1 world champion Max Verstappen says the new era of Formula One racing with 5050 electric hybrids is not racing. And like playing Mario Kart. And last week, Atlassian cut 1600 jobs globally, blaming AI. White collar workers are watching the AI job carnage, wondering what jobs are on the chopping block and what jobs have a future. Today's episode was produced by Chi Wong. Our executive producer is Tammy Mills. And our podcasts are overseen by Lisa Muxworthy and Tom McKendrick. If you like our show, follow the MORNING Edition and leave a review for us on Apple or Spotify. Thanks for listening.
Podcast: The Morning Edition (The Age & The Sydney Morning Herald)
Host: Samantha Selinger-Morris
Guest: Angus Thompson, Health Reporter
Date: March 17, 2026
Episode Theme: Examining a major new Australian study casting doubt on medicinal cannabis's effectiveness for mental health and exploring broader implications for patients, research, and regulation.
This episode investigates a newly-published study from Australian researchers (Lancet Psychiatry, Mar 2026) finding no evidence that medicinal cannabis is effective at treating anxiety, depression, and PTSD. Host Samantha Selinger-Morris and health reporter Angus Thompson delve into the study’s methodology, reactions from the community, patient experiences, and the regulatory environment a decade after legalisation.
On the State of Research:
"There is just not much research into medicinal cannabis, which is somewhat surprising given it has been legalized and regulated for decades in some countries."
— Angus Thompson (05:12)
On Patient Experience:
“He was spending more on his cannabis prescription per week than his $300 rent … [but now] found his mental health has improved, his emotions are more regulated and he's getting better quality sleep … it's probably one of the best decisions he's ever made.”
— Angus Thompson (talking about Daniel Yakuel, 07:34–09:18)
On Research and Regulation:
“There isn't that much incentive for these companies to invest in these trials because they're already making money and they're already got quite small margins on prescribing medicinal cannabis to Australians.”
— Angus (quoting Prof. Ian McGregor, 10:52)
On Risk:
“There could be really serious harms that we don't know about because it hasn't been studied.” — Angus Thompson (14:16)
A decade into legal medicinal cannabis, Australia is now confronting the reality that evidence for its effectiveness—especially for anxiety, depression and PTSD—is limited and inconclusive, as highlighted by a major new study. While growing numbers of patients seek relief and the industry expands rapidly, the episode underscores the urgent need for rigorous, independent clinical trials to establish both efficacy and safety. Meanwhile, practical legal reforms and patient lived experience continue to shape the evolving debate.