It’s Not Just You: The Internet Is Actually Getting Worse

Summary

---

The New Yorker Radio Hour

Episode: "It’s Not Just You: The Internet Is Actually Getting Worse"

Host: David Remnick

Guest: Cory Doctorow (interviewed by Kyle Chayka)

Date: October 28, 2025

---

Overview

This episode features The New Yorker’s technology columnist Kyle Chayka in conversation with prolific writer, tech activist, and science fiction author Cory Doctorow. The central theme revolves around “enshittification” (a term coined by Doctorow), which describes the process by which major online platforms and services gradually become worse for users and businesses in pursuit of profit, until only the companies themselves benefit. The conversation delves into why so many digital experiences seem worse now, how regulatory frameworks enable this decline, and whether there’s hope for a better future online.

---

Key Discussion Points and Insights

1. The Concept of “Enshittification”

• Definition: “Enshittification” is the stepwise degradation of online platforms as they lock in users, then business customers, before ultimately prioritizing the enrichment of shareholders and executives at everyone else’s expense.
  • Doctorow explains:

    “When you describe something that is all around but that is sort of so diffuse that you can't really put your finger on it... you kind of attach a handle to it and you give people a way to carry it around and maybe try and carry it to each other and say, are you noticing this? I’m noticing this. I thought I was crazy. I thought it was just me.”
    (Cory Doctorow, 03:17)

• Origins: The term, coined by Cory Doctorow, was the 2023 Word of the Year and is the subject of his new book.

2. Google Search as a Case Study

• Intentional Degradation:
  • Google’s internal memos from a DOJ antitrust case revealed decisions to worsen search in order to increase ad revenue, as growth plateaued.
  • Doctorow recounts:

    “Why don't we make search worse?... What if we make it a three shot, right? What if we make it so that you got to search two or three times and then every time we get to show you ads.”
    (Cory Doctorow, 04:09)

• Lack of Competition:
  • Google’s dominance comes not from product excellence alone but also from paying to be the default search engine across devices and browsers.
  • Even when competitors exist, degraded search opens doors for alternatives (e.g., Kagi, OpenAI’s “generative search”), though often only “less bad” by comparison.

  • “You can't tell me that Google cannot do a better job with its own search index than what, eight guys in a garage?”
    (Cory Doctorow, 07:33)

3. The Three Stages of Enshittification

• Stage 1: Platforms are great to users to attract and lock them in.
• Stage 2: Platforms shift focus to optimizing for business customers (advertisers, sellers, content creators) at the expense of users.
• Stage 3: Once both groups are locked in, the platform prioritizes extracting maximum value for shareholders/executives, making things bad for both users and business customers.

  • “All the value, except for whatever kind of homeopathic residue is needed to keep people locked in and to keep business customers locked into those people, all that value has been extracted, given to shareholders, given to executives. And that is like the final stage of enshittification.”
    (Cory Doctorow, 09:52)

4. Regulatory and Legal Barriers Preventing Competitor Emergence

• Then vs. Now: In the MySpace/Facebook migration era, users could bring their data from one platform to another. Today, copyright law (e.g., DMCA Section 1201) and expanded IP protection make such collective action impractical or illegal.

  • “We've kind of rigged the game so that history ended with the current round of winners... no one can do unto them as they did unto their predecessors.”
    (Cory Doctorow, 12:16)

• The result: Modern platforms are able to degrade user experience without meaningful risk of mass user defection or competition.

5. Antitrust and Policy Responses: A Glimmer of Hope

• A Global Movement:
  • Antitrust scrutiny and action have increased worldwide, in the EU, Canada, Australia, and even China, not just the US.
  • Doctorow credits public pressure and a growing political consensus as drivers for renewed regulation—even under seemingly unlikely governments.

  • “This is happening everywhere. And Trump, he's trying to stop it. But... there was this giant political tailwind for doing something about concentrated power, about monopoly. And that came from you and me, that came from people who are living out what the finance sector calls Stein's Law, that anything that can't go on forever eventually stops.”
    (Cory Doctorow, 17:19)

• Policy Ripple Effects:
  • Example: The EU’s USB-C charging rule forced Apple to change hardware globally for simplicity.
  • The Digital Markets Act imposes interoperability and privacy requirements, benefiting users worldwide.

6. AI and the Next Potential Enshittification

• AI Hype vs. Reality:
  • Billions are invested in generative AI with a view to automating labor; Doctorow argues this is misguided, and AI is currently more “flashy demo” than functional replacement.
  • Doctorow warns:

    “I don't think that bosses firing workers and replacing with AI is going to work... It's like saying, you know, we keep breeding these horses to run faster and faster, it's only a matter of time till one of the mares gives birth to a locomotive.” (Cory Doctorow, 21:06)

• Extractive Pricing Models: AI services are quickly adopting opaque, value-extracting billing models, reminiscent of other enshittified services.

7. Advertising and the “Privacy Crisis”

• Advertising Isn’t the Root, Surveillance Is:
  • Doctorow, who has run advertising-supported sites, argues the problem isn’t advertising but the model of pervasive, surveillant “behavioral” ads.
  • If surveillance advertising is banned, marketers would still use ads, just less intrusively.
• Privacy as the Common Thread:
  • Issues from online radicalization to police tracking to deepfakes to discrimination are united by the lack of modernized privacy laws.

  • “If we could just make it illegal to spy on people, we could solve so many problems like that.”
    (Cory Doctorow, 24:45)

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• “I immediately grabbed onto it. I knew what it meant... everything just seems to be getting worse all around on our phones and on websites.”
  — Kyle Chayka on discovering “enshittification” (02:13)

• “The product doesn't have to be so bad.”
  — Kyle Chayka (07:33)

• “You can't tell me that Google cannot do a better job with its own search index than what, eight guys in a garage?”
  — Cory Doctorow (07:33)

• “We've kind of rigged the game so that history ended with the current round of winners...”
  — Cory Doctorow (12:16)

• “It’s not just that everything is getting more and more and enshittified... there are strategies and there are ways to make that lever... harder to use.”
  — Kyle Chayka (16:05)

• “The policy environment creates enshittification, right? The enshittificatory environment creates the regime in which bad impulses, bad people, bad ideas thrive. And so we have to make a hostile environment for enshittification.”
  — Cory Doctorow (23:22)

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• [01:47] — Introduction by David Remnick and the origin of “enshittification”
• [03:17] — Cory Doctorow on giving shape to a nebulous decline online
• [03:49] — Google Search example: Deliberate product degradation for ads
• [07:56] — Doctorow explains the three stages of enshittification
• [10:42] — Platforms' use of IP law to block competitor migration
• [16:31] — Signs of optimism: global antitrust and regulatory action
• [18:34] — EU laws' effect on global product and privacy standards
• [20:45] — The questionable rush to replace workers with AI
• [22:58] — Debate over advertising vs. privacy/surveillance as the root cause
• [24:45] — The privacy coalition as a solution to a wide array of digital woes

---

Tone and Takeaways

True to Doctorow’s direct and witty style, the conversation is clear-eyed, at times irreverent, but ultimately constructive. The episode affirms that while the internet’s decline is real and intentional, history, policy, and user organizing can—and sometimes do—open new pathways for positive change. Above all, Doctorow urges that modernizing privacy laws and fostering competitive markets are tools within reach to reverse the current “enshittification” trend.

---

For further reading, Kyle Chayka's column “Infinite Scroll” publishes weekly at newyorker.com.

Transcript

[Podcast Narrator/Announcer]

This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. Fiscally responsible financial geniuses. Monetary magicians. These are things people say about drivers who switch their car insurance to Progressive and save hundreds. Visit progressive.com to see if you could save Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Potential savings will vary. Not available in all states or situations. Support comes from Dakota State University what happens when you unite dynamic minds with one revolutionary vision? A rising force on the cutting edge of everything from a little university on the prairie to a cyber powerhouse of the plains? We're proving the nation's best cyber can come from where you least expect it. Now we're molding the future of cyber AI and quantum computing one graduate at a time. See what Dakota State University is building [e-mail] the New Yorker Radio Hour is.

[Sponsor Voice]

Supported by Justin Wines. Whether you're a first time wine drinker or a wine connoisseur, you're guaranteed to like the number one selling luxury cabernet from Justin. Since 1981, Justin Vineyards and Winery has been producing world class Bordeaux style wines from Paso Robles and are what put the Paso Robles region on the winemaking map. Wines like their flagship red blend Isosceles are perfect to enjoy with friends and family this holiday season. Shop all of their exceptional [e-mail] and be sure to use the promo code RADIO20 to receive 20% off your order today.

[Podcast Host]

This is the New Yorker Radio Hour, a co production of WNYC Studios and the New Yorker.

[David Remnick]

This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick. Sometimes a term is so apt, its meaning so clear and so relevant to our circumstances that it becomes more than just a useful buzzword and grows to define an entire moment. I'm quoting the New Yorker's technology columnist Kyle Chayka. The term he's describing, well, it's so evocative that unfortunately we can't say it on the air.

[Kyle Chayka]

I immediately grabbed onto it. I knew what it meant. I could apply it in my own experience because everything just seems to be getting worse all around on our phones and on websites.

[David Remnick]

The term is inshidification and it was coined by Cory Doctorow.

[Kyle Chayka]

I've been following Cory Doctorow's work for years and years on the Internet. He's someone who I always look to to understand what's going on online and how the latest tech policy is changing and how things work. And when I saw him starting to use this word inshittification or everything getting worse, I just immediately understood what he was talking about. I think, as we all do.

[David Remnick]

Inshidification was a word of the year in 2023, and now it's the title of Cory Doctorow's new book. Doctorow is a prolific and respected tech blogger, and he writes science fiction too. He also played a big role in the Electronic Frontier foundation, which advocates for civil liberties online. Here's Cory Doctorow speaking with the New Yorker's Kyle Cheka.

[Cory Doctorow]

Well, I think that when you describe something that is all around but that is sort of so diffuse that you can't really put your finger on it when you describe it, you kind of attach a handle to it and you give people a way to carry it around and maybe try and carry it to each other and say, are you noticing this? I'm noticing this. I thought I was crazy. I thought it was just me.

[Kyle Chayka]

Maybe we can start with an example that a lot of our listeners will have experienced already. Can you talk about what happened with Google Search?

[Cory Doctorow]

You know, the Google DOJ antitrust trial last year surfaced all these memos about a fight about making Google search worse. So in 2019, Google had reached maximum search growth. They had a 90% market share in search. So they weren't going to get any more users except maybe by like breeding a billion humans to maturity and then making them Google users, which, like, I.

[Kyle Chayka]

Haven'T tried that yet.

[Cory Doctorow]

Well, no, it's. That's vicious. No, that's Google Classroom. It just takes a while, right? And so as a great Ed Zitron reported in his newsletter in where's your Ed at? You see in the memos, this strategy emerged. This guy, Prabhakar Raghavan, who's an ex McKinsey guy who'd been at Yahoo overseeing Yahoo Search, who's in charge of Google search revenue, he says, why don't we make search worse? Why don't we get rid of things like spell check or something called query stemming, where if you search for trousers, it also searches for pants or, or context clues, right? Like everybody is searching for pants because someone got pantsed on national tv. And so when searches for pants, you look at like kind of trending queries and you put that at the top, you know, so all of that stuff that made it so that you could one shot your search, right? You search and the top result be the one you were looking for. What if we make it a three shot, right? What if we make it so that you got to search two or three times and then every time we get to show you ads. And there's this guy at Google, Ben Gomes, who's a Googler from the OG days, he was building their first servers when it was like one computer under a desk. He oversaw the build out to all of the data centers all over the world. And he's in charge of search technology. And he's like, what are you talking about? This is a terrible idea. And you know, historically I think that guy would have won the argument not because the Google founders had a sense of holy mission. Maybe they did and maybe they didn't, but because Google understood that, as they used to say, competition is just a click away. But at that point, Google had spent many years bribing Apple to the tune of $20 billion a year not to make a competing search engine. They had bribed all the browsers and all of the mobile carriers and all the people who made operating systems to make Google the default search. Even Microsoft's browser was just a re badged version of Chrome. And so everywhere you looked, there was Google search. And they could make it worse and.

[Kyle Chayka]

It wouldn't matter because people had nowhere else to go and they could turn the screws tighter and tighter and extract more of our attention until we eventually flee elsewhere, which may be happening now with OpenAI and generative search that in some ways is delivering a more convenient product, even though not necessarily a better one. Yeah, not right.

[Cory Doctorow]

But one of the things about OpenAI that that story tells you, because that search is not good, is that people are willing to use perplexity and OpenAI instead of search because search is so degraded.

[Interviewer/Host Assistant]

Right?

[Cory Doctorow]

It's only good in comparison. And here's the kicker. I use a search engine. I'm not affiliated with them in any way, but I use a search engine called kagi k-a g I.com and I was just amazed by how good they were the first time I used them. I was staying with my fiction editor and I was in his living room on my computer and so is he. And he was like, have you ever tried Kagi? And I'm like, kaggy, no, tell me more. And he's like, it's like Google used to be when Google started. And I was like, that's amazing. It's 10 bucks a month. I tried it for like 10 seconds. And I'm like, okay, I'm buying it. And then I read this article by Jason Kebler in 404 Media about Kagi. He's using it too. And he's like, by the way, they're using Google's index and they're syndicating and reorganizing its results. Now, Kagi, these seem like very smart people, but I don't know how many people work there. 10? 20, maybe? Like, I don't know. It's certainly not a hundred. But you can't tell me that Google cannot do a better job with its own search index than what, eight guys in a garage?

[Kyle Chayka]

It just goes to show that the product doesn't have to be so bad.

[Cory Doctorow]

No, it's a choice.

[Kyle Chayka]

Like the core good product is in there somewhere. We're just not allowed to access it because of all these layers of tweaking and mediation. You define this very specific process or the stages of things getting worse, as we can say euphemistically. And I was hoping you could go through those for us.

[Cory Doctorow]

Sure. So inshidification describes a three stage process by which platforms go bad. In stage one, the platform is good to its end users, but it finds a way to lock those end users in. There's different ways based on different platforms. You know, Uber chased all the other cab companies out of the market, so that's one way to get locked in. It's very complicated. Facebook had a much easier one, which is like, once you're in a place with a bunch of friends, it's really hard to organize them all to go. Economists just call that the collective action problem. You know, you love your friends, but they're a pain in the ass. You can't agree on what board game to play this weekend, much less like, you know, when it's time to leave Facebook, Especially if some of you are there, because that's where you hang out with the people have the same rare disease as you or your customers, or the people you left behind when you moved, or the people organizing the little league carpool. So it's really hard to go. And so you have people locked in. Once they're locked in, the platform is worse to those end users in order to be good to business customers. And it brings in advertisers, publishers, taxi drivers, platform sellers, performers, sex workers, whoever it is that they are brokering the introduction between. And this is where I think a lot of other critiques stop. You know, they'll say, oh, if you're not paying for the product, you're the product. That there's a kind of conspiracy between, say, advertisers and Facebook to screw end users. But what actually happens after the business customers are locked in is they get screwed too, right? And so the platforms start to squeeze their business customers and they try to reach a kind of equilibrium where all the value, except for Whatever kind of homeopathic residue is needed to keep people locked in and to keep business customers locked into those people. All that value has been extracted, given to shareholders, given to executives. And that is like the final stage of vacation. And that's where I think we find ourselves now with a lot of platforms, they're not the minimum viable product, they're like the maximally product.

[Kyle Chayka]

I think you described that third stage in the book as something like a giant pile of garbage. Everyone is.

[Cory Doctorow]

I heard that wasn't garbage, but yes, indeed, yes.

[Kyle Chayka]

Yeah. So no one is winning except for the platform. In this model, the users have been attracted in. We like the features, we like the product. That's cool. Then the businesses come in and they're making money too, and everyone is happy for a little while, like maybe a year in this utopian situation of the platform. And then the screws start to turn and everyone is suffering except for the platform and its executives. So in those stages, like the per, the people who are benefiting at the end are Mark Zuckerberg or Elon Musk of X Now, like, what does that end stage look like that we're living in right now?

[Cory Doctorow]

Well, it's not new, right? Like, they didn't invent greed in like 2019, nor did they invent the ways that tech platforms can change the rules from moment to moment that allows this inside ification. You know, people have been remotely downgrading platforms and technologies for as long as they've been around. What changed is that the platforms don't lose to competitors when that happens. So you know Mark Zuckerberg, when he launched Facebook thing, he offered to the general public in 2006 where you didn't have to have a Edu address to join it. His pitch was, sure, you are all using MySpace, but did you know that it's owned by an evil, crapulent, senescent Australian billionaire named Rupert Murdoch who's spying on you with every hour that God sends. Come to Facebook. We'll never spy on you and we'll only show you the things you asked to see. We're not going to boost stuff into your field of vision that you didn't ask for. And, you know, it wasn't enough to bring people over from MySpace. MySpace users had a collective action problem too. The difference was that back then IP laws hadn't been monotonically expanded in the way that they have in the last 20 years. And so Mark Zuckerberg was able to give MySpace users a scraper, and you gave that scraper your username and password this bot and it would pretend to be you at MySpace several times a day, grab everything in your feed that was waiting to be shown to you, and it would put you and put that in your Facebook feed. You can reply to it there and then it would push it back out to MySpace. So you didn't have a collective action problem. You could just move from one to the other. Now, 20 years later, if you try to do that to Facebook, they'll say you violated Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright act and patents and trademarks and copyrights and trade secrets. We've kind of rigged the game so that history ended with the current round of winners that no one can do unto them as they did unto their predecessors.

[David Remnick]

Cory Doctorow speaking with New Yorker columnist Kyle Chaeca. More in a moment.

[Podcast Host]

WNYC Studios is supported by Quince.

[Sponsor Voice]

We're finally getting into nice, brisk fall weather, and I'm swapping in the perfect fall layering pieces. Warm, durable and built to last. And Quince delivers every time with wardrobe staples that'll carry you through the season. Quince has the kind of fall staples you'll actually want to wear on repeat, like 100% Mongolian cashmere from Just Dollar Classic Fit Denim and real leather and wool outerwear that looks sharp and holds up. I've got my eye on their suede trucker jacket. It's perfect for layering and just looks really casual. But put together by partnering directly with ethical factories and top artisans, Quince cuts out the middlemen to deliver premium quality at half the cost of similar brands. And why not make the bedroom cozy while you're at it? From premium down comforters to cashmere throws, Quince has you covered. Literally. Layer up this fall with pieces that feel as good as they look. Go to quince.com radiohour for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. Now available in Canada too. Q-U-I-N-C-E.com radiohour to get free shipping and 365 day returns.

[Podcast Host]

WNYC Studios is supported by Whole Foods Market.

[Podcast Narrator/Announcer]

You know that moment when you're planning Thanksgiving or friendsgiving and realize you need everything from Turkey to green beans. 365 by Whole Foods Market has you covered this year with Thanksgiving Essentials for less. No antibiotics ever. Birds bring quality to the table at a great price. And don't forget the sides. The 365 brand has all the must haves to complete your gathering. Condensed soups, instant mashed potatoes, organic baking spices and more Enjoy so many ways to save on your Thanksgiving spread at Whole Foods Market.

[Podcast Host]

WNYC Studios is supported by Dell Technologies introducing the new Dell PC with the Intel Core Ultra processor. It helps you handle a lot, even when your holiday to do list gets to be a lot like organizing your holiday shopping and searching for great holiday deals and customer questions and customers requesting custom things. Plus planning the perfect holiday dinner for vegans, vegetarians, pescatarians and the rest of the family's dietary restrictions. Luckily, you can get a PC with all day battery life to help you get it all done. That's the power of a Dell PC with Intel inside backed by Dell's Price match guarantee. Get yours [e-mail] holiday terms and conditions apply. See dell.com for details.

[Interviewer/Host Assistant]

The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by AT&T. There's nothing better than feeling like someone has your back and that things are going to get done without you even having to ask. Like your friend offering to help you move without you even having to offer pizza and drinks first. It's a beautiful thing when someone is two steps ahead of you, quietly making your life easier. Staying connected matters. That's why in the rare event of a network outage, AT and T will proactively credit you for a full day of service. That's the AT&T guarantee. Credit for fiber downtime lasting 20 minutes or more or for wireless downtime lasting 60 minutes or more caused by a single incident impacting 10 or more towers must be connected to impacted tower at onset of outage. Restrictions and exclusions apply. See att.com guarantee for full details. AT and T Connecting changes everything.

[Kyle Chayka]

In the book. You are not a total pessimist, and you're far from pessimistic about this. Actually, it's not just that everything is getting more and more and shittified and worse and worse and there's nothing to do about it. There are strategies and there are ways to like make that lever of inshitification harder to use. I mean, maybe you can talk about how there are these political ideas to fix this, but perhaps under Trump right now we're not seeing so much action.

[Cory Doctorow]

Well, yeah, you know, I mean there is something quite miraculous about antitrust in the last six or seven years, even under Trump. You know, the case that Google just lost started under Trump and what's miraculous about it is that it's happened all over the world. It's easy to think of this as being like just a thing Joe Biden did. I don't think Joe Biden actually did it I think that Joe Biden was cornered into it by elements of his party who were sick to the back teeth of concentrated power and wealth and who, you know, in order to keep that coalition together, he had to do something. But it wasn't just Joe Biden who was cornered into that. You know, like all the best Americans, I'm Canadian, and in Canada we have this very, very weak competition regime. Our Competition bureau had challenged three mergers in its whole history, but it succeeded zero times. Right. And yet Justin Trudeau, again hardly an enemy of concentrated corporate power, whipped his party to pass big, muscular antitrust law that created new powers for a competition bureau. We've seen very big antitrust action in the EU and at EU member states like Germany and France and Spain, but also in Australia, South Korea, Japan and even China. So this is happening everywhere. And Trump, he's trying to stop it. But the reason Trump did it in 2019 when he brought the case against Google, was not merely that he was petulant about big tech, it was that there was this giant political tailwind for doing something about concentrated power, about monopoly. And that came from you and me, that came from people who are living out what the finance sector calls Stein's Law, that anything that can't go on forever eventually stops. And that power is still abroad in the world.

[Kyle Chayka]

And we're seeing so much more activity and action in the eu, in the UK as far as passing these packages of regulations. But they are impacting how American users experience technology too. There's this kind of trickle down effect or trickle across. Can you talk about that a little bit?

[Cory Doctorow]

Yeah. Well, so some of that is, is already happening, as you say. So the European Union, for example, said Apple, we don't care how much money you make selling lightning chargers. From now on, everything sold in the European Union, unless there's a damn good reason, is going to have a USB C charger and we're not going to keep filling our E waste dumps with immortal garbage that has proprietary dongles on it. And Apple fetched and they complained, but they did it. And they kind of, I guess, decided that it was like logistically transcendently hard to do this in a way where they would split the manufacturing run and they would send the USB C ones to Europe and they'd send the lightning port ones to America and everyone else. So everybody else got it. Now the Digital Markets act, which came into effect in 2024, goes a lot further and it imposes these interoperability requirements on companies so they can't lock rivals out of the platform, right? They can't say, oh well, we think you might invade our users privacy or consumer rights, so we're not going to let you in. In Europe, what they say is, well, we have a privacy law here, unlike in America. America hasn't had a new privacy law since Ronald Reagan banned video store clerks from disclosing your VHS rentals in 1988. But you know, other countries have mature, muscular privacy laws and they say like, we'll decide that if a company like plugs into an Apple device and invades someone's privacy, we'll take care of that. You can stand down. Tim Cook. And Apple is so upset about this that they threatened to leave the EU overhead, which is not going to happen. And in fact, after that was reported, they were like, oh no, no, no, that's not what we were threatening at all. We're just sad. This is more in sorrow than in anger. We hope you'll see the error of your ways. But you know, Apple's not going to walk away from 500 million affluent consumers.

[Kyle Chayka]

And that's what's going to get this singular experience. It's easier to make one product for everyone and that product has to toe some line if the laws are strict enough in order to reach enough consumers. But I was thinking also about AI and I'm curious what stage of inshidification you think generative AI is in. Right?

[Cory Doctorow]

Whatever AI can or can't do. The reason it has attracted hundreds of billions of dollars in investment capital is because the market is betting that you can fire workers and replace them with chatbots. And I don't think you can. I don't think that. Not only do I not think you can now, I don't think you will be in the future. I think that there are lots of ways in which when workers are in charge of how they use AI, they might make their job better, they might be better at their job, they might be happier. But I don't think that bosses firing workers and replacing with AI is going to work. And I don't think that shoveling more words into the word guessing program will make that happen. I think that's like saying, you know, we keep breeding these horses to run faster and faster, it's only a matter of time till one of the mayors gives birth to a locomotive. You know, a person is not like a word guessing program with more words.

[Interviewer/Host Assistant]

Right.

[Cory Doctorow]

And so I think, because ification is about a service that works, getting worse, and AI is kind of a service that was just a bunch of flashy demos that it's in really a different space. Although it is interesting to note that all of the promising avenues for improvement according to AI bosses involve doing a lot more AI queries and having that happen automatically through these things called routers that take what would have been a query that cost you one sum and turn it into 20 queries that each cost you a sum but that you have no insight into. You don't get to choose how, how that query is broken up and and subbed out to these different kinds of models at different prices. Which even if they're not ripping you off now, which I'm 100% sure they are, they will rip you off in the future with. Right, they just have a black box where it's just like you give them a credit card and they then after you ask a question they tell you how much they've charged your credit card. Why wouldn't they abuse that power?

[Kyle Chayka]

Yeah, they're already extracting more value from the user as much as they can. I mean right now we're seeing OpenAI rollout advertising friendly products. Advertising in your book seems to be the harbinger of the worst kinds of inshinification and is kind of the model that underlies much of the Internet right now.

[Cory Doctorow]

So actually I want to quibble with that a little. I was the co editor for many years and I'm still the co owner of a website called Boing Boing which is one of the first big advertising supported blogs. And our advertisers only made us invade our users privacy to the extent that our users privacy was invadable. And so when pop up blockers became normal, advertisers stopped asking for pop ups. When ad blockers became normal, advertisers became less interested in evading people's privacy. And I think that if we banned surveillance advertising and just went back to contextual advertising that advertisers would say oh well we're not going to advertise anymore. But when the time comes of course they're going to advertise. There's no way companies are not going to pay advertising firms to tell other people about their products. It's a completely ridiculous thing to claim. And so back to the thesis of the book. The policy environment creates inshidification, right? The inshitificatory environment creates the regime in which bad impulses, bad people, bad ideas thrive. And so we have to make a hostile environment for enshitification. We are long past the day where we should be updating our privacy law. You know, at the Electronic Frontier foundation we had this campaign called Privacy first, where it's like, if you're, if you're angry because Grampy's a QAnon, you think Facebook brainwashed them. Or you think the reason your teenager is anorexic is because Insta brainwashed her. Or you think the reason the millennials in your life are quoting Osama bin Laden is because TikTok brainwashed them. Or if you're angry about cops using reverse warrants to round up protesters at anti ice demonstrations or the January six Rio. Or if you're angry about kids being followed into abortion clinics by their phones. Or if you're angry about someone making deepfake porn of you. If you're angry about people being racially discriminated against when they get a loan or get a job or get a mortgage, what you're really angry about is privacy. Right? This is all surveillance. And the coalition for this is so big and it crosses so many political lines that if we could just make it illegal to spy on people, we could solve so many problems like that.

[Kyle Chayka]

Would break the whole model that's going on right now.

[Cory Doctorow]

Yeah.

[Kyle Chayka]

Well, Corey, thank you so much for coming on. It was a pleasure to talk to you.

[Cory Doctorow]

The pleasure is very mutual. Thank you for having me on.

[David Remnick]

Cory Doctorow is a writer and former European director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. He spoke with staff writer Kyle Jacobs. Kyle's column, Infinite scroll, publishes weekly@new yorker.com and you can subscribe to the New Yorker there as well. New yorker.com I'm David Remnick. Hope you enjoy the show. Next week, Jon Stewart joins us in a conversation from the New Yorker Festival. Don't miss it.

[Podcast Host]

The New Yorker Radio Hour is a co production of WNYC Studios and the New Yorker. Our theme music was composed and performed by Meryl Garbus of Tune Yards, with additional music by Louis Mitchell. This episode was produced by Max Balton, Adam Howard, David Krasnow, Jeffrey Masters, Louis Mitchell, Jared Paul and Ursula Sommer. With guidance from Emily Bottin and assistance from Michael May, David Gable, Alex Parish, Victor Guan and Alejandra Deckett. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported in part by the Turina Endowment Fund.

[Podcast Narrator/Announcer]

Our state has changed a lot in the last 140 years. We know because Multicare has been here guided by a single purpose, making our communities healthier. That comes from making courageous decisions, partnering with local communities to grow programs and services, and expanding healthcare access to those who need it most. Together, we're building a healthier future. Learn [e-mail].

[Podcast Host]

It'S one of Britain's most notorious crimes, the killing of a wealthy family at Whitehouse Farm. But I got a tip that the story of this famous case might be all wrong.

[Kyle Chayka]

I know there's going to be a twist one day, a massive twist.

[Cory Doctorow]

At every level of the criminal justice.

[David Remnick]

System, there's been a cover up in this case.

[Podcast Host]

I'm Heidi Blake. Blood Relatives is a new series from in the Dark and the New Yorker. Find it now in the in the Dark podcast feedback.