Transcript
A (0:01)
Welcome back to the observable unknown. I'm Dr. Juan Carlos Rey of crowscubboard.com and today's letter comes from Marcus D. In Chicago, who asks you and Dr. Daniel Jorgensen spoke about the sociology of religion. How much do you think social media functions as a new form of ritual space? Marcus, this is a remarkable question because it goes beyond sociology into the evolution of consciousness itself. Ritual has always been the architecture of the invisible. Long before algorithms and hashtags, human beings gathered to transform isolation into order through repetition, rhythm and symbol. The anthropologist Catherine Bell, in her 1992 work Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice, argued that ritual is not simply a reflection of belief, it is a technology for making meaning. Every gesture, every chant, every offering structures the world so that chaos can be endured. When we log onto social media, we are still building temples, only now those temples are digital and self reflective. Instead of incense, we offer images. Instead of prayer, we offer performance. At the University of Toronto in 2019, sociologist Annabelle Kwan Haas studied how online networks recreate the emotional intensity of communal gatherings. She described affective loops, patterns of shared emotion that rise and fall collectively. Much like the rhythmic energy in religious chant. Each viral post becomes a rite of intensification, a moment where belonging is renewed by shared reaction. The like reaction is not trivial. It's the digital handshake of the sacred. It says, I have seen you, and in seeing you I confirm that you exist. In this sense, social media doesn't just mirror ritual. It is ritual, a new form of congregational attention, transient yet no less holy for its brevity. The cultural theorist Byung Chul han, in his 2017 text Psychopolitics, suggested that we have moved from a disciplinary society to a performance society. Where we once obeyed, we now display. The altar has become the self. Every profile is an icon, every post a small act of devotion to one's constructed identity. We curate our feed as monks once illuminated manuscripts, laboring to make our lives legible to others and perhaps to ourselves, sometimes beautifying our lives beyond what might be seen as trite, mundane or banal. And yet, as Han observed, the performance society is exhausting precisely because it offers no true witness, only surveillance. We are watched constantly, but almost never seen. Neuroscientists at Stanford, led by Dr. Robert Sapolsky in 2021, examined how intermittent reward patterns, like those of social media stimulate dopaminergic surges akin to religious ecstasy. The brain responds to unpredictable affirmation the same way it responds to prayerful anticipation with hope, risk and chemical devotion. The anthropologist Tanya Lerman at Stanford, has written extensively about the neurological realism of faith, the way inner experiences become real through repetition and social validation. In many ways, social media mimics the same feedback structure. Private emotion becomes public truth through performance. Public attention becomes personal meaning. The sacred has always lived where emotion meets repetition. Now that union appears to happen more beneath blue light rather than beneath candlelight. Art historian David Morgan, writing in the Sacred Gaze 2005, described devotion as a practice of sexual seeing with longing. To gaze is to give energy, to surrender part of the self in recognition of something worthy. This actually reminds me very much of a practice in Sanatana Dharma, referred to as Darshan, where the gaze is the method of praise. On social media, we are constantly gazing, and in that gaze we consecrate the ordinary. The photograph, the caption, the confession, all function as icons through which desire circulates. But when every image seeks reverence, reverence itself becomes diluted. Meaning collapses, not because the sacred dies, but because it is overproduced. Too many altars, too little silence. The political scientist Langdon Winner once said that artifacts have politics. Algorithms are no exception. They determine visibility hierarchy, even orthodoxy. Who gets canonized? Who gets excommunicated? In the pre digital world, the priest or the community ecstatic, sometimes referred to as a medicine person or a guru, mediated access to the divine. Today that role is fulfilled by invisible code, not by ecumenical representative. It predicts our devotions. It curates our collective liturgy. The theologian Heidi Campbell, who studies digital religion at Texas A M, argues that these algorithms function as ritual regulators. They determine what communities worship by amplifying the content that keeps them most emotionally engaged. Our gods have become behavioral economists. Marcus, you asked whether social media is a new ritual place. The answer is yes, beyond the shadow of a doubt. But it is a fragile one. Its liturgies are constant but shallow. Its congregations are vast but profoundly impermanent. Still, within this ephemeral cathedral, something ancient stirs. That is the need to make meaning together. If we learn to use platforms not only to perform, but to commune, not only to broadcast, but to witness, the digital altar might yet serve its oldest purpose. To remind us that we're not alone. But for that to happen, we must reintroduce reverence into attention itself. The algorithm may amplify, but only interaction and intention can sanctify. That was today's letter from the unknown. Thank you, Marcus, for this question. And to all of you who continue to send reflections, theories and wonderings into this shared field of listening. If you've listened this far, please remember our mailbag series is not a lecture but a correspondence. Every question you send, every reflection you offer becomes part of the living architecture of this project. It's proof that the observable unknown isn't just something I speak about, it's something we explore together. If this exchange has moved you, please take a moment to leave a review or rating wherever you're listening. Pandora, Spotify, Apple Podcasts because those simple gestures help new listeners find their way into this circle of thought. I am Dr. Juan Carlos Rey of crowscubboard.com and if you'd like to send your own question, you can share your thoughts with me on X, where you'll find me as at Dr. Juan Carlos Rey. You can write to me directly@theobservableunknownmail.com or you can text me at 336-675-5836. You can also join our community on WhatsApp at TheObservable Unknown. Until next time, Remember, attention is the oldest prayer, and silence the altar upon which it is answered.