The Worst Part of Pete Hegseth’s Group Chat Debacle

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Worst Part of Pete Hegseth’s Group Chat Debacle

Podcast Information:

• Title: The Opinions
• Host/Author: The New York Times Opinion
• Description: You've heard the news, here's what to make of it.
• Episode: The Worst Part of Pete Hegseth’s Group Chat Debacle
• Release Date: March 26, 2025

---

Introduction to the Controversy

In the March 26, 2025 episode of The Opinions, hosts David French and Jeffrey Goldberg delve into a significant national security breach involving Pete Hegseth, a prominent figure connected to the Department of Defense. The episode unpacks the implications of a leaked group chat that revealed sensitive information about planned military actions against Houthi targets in Yemen.

Notable Quote:

David French [02:04]: "Sharing war plans is among the most egregious forms of security breach. It's hard to think of a form of security breach that is worse than this."

---

Details of the Security Breach

The controversy centers around an incident where Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, was invited by the National Security Advisor to join a private Signal group chat. This chat included high-ranking White House officials discussing tactical plans to bomb Houthi targets in Yemen.

Key Points:

• Unauthorized Sharing: Goldberg received messages detailing attack plans, including timing, methods, and target information (00:55).
• Severity of the Breach: Both hosts emphasize the gravity of sharing such sensitive information on a non-secure platform like Signal (02:04).
• Potential Consequences: The leak could allow Houthis to evade attacks, relocate weapons, or preemptively strike, potentially leading to significant loss of life and naval assets (02:36).

Notable Quotes:

Jeffrey Goldberg [03:01]: "Missiles, they could move their senior leaders." (03:01)

David French [04:27]: "A security breach this significant requires thorough investigation." (04:27)

---

Administrative and Political Fallout

French and Goldberg criticize the administration's handling of the breach, highlighting inadequate responses and a lack of accountability. They argue that the minimalistic approach to addressing the breach undermines military professionalism and national security.

Key Points:

• Administration's Response: The White House claims no classified information was shared and attempts to downplay the incident (03:12).
• Internal Criticism: Pete Hegseth attacks Goldberg's integrity instead of addressing his own role in the breach (05:51).
• Calls for Accountability: Hosts advocate for immediate suspension and investigation of all involved parties to restore trust and uphold security standards (06:03).

Notable Quotes:

David French [07:10]: "Nothing destroys a leader's credibility with soldiers more thoroughly than hypocrisy or double standards." (07:10)

Jeffrey Goldberg [08:19]: "Relieved for political reasons." (08:19)

---

Implications for Military and National Security

The discussion underscores the detrimental impact such breaches have on the integrity and effectiveness of the U.S. military. French and Goldberg warn that prioritizing political loyalty over professionalism could erode the military's foundational values and operational effectiveness.

Key Points:

• Erosion of Trust: Leadership hypocrisy damages the bond between soldiers and commanders, leading to decreased morale and reliability (07:25).
• Military Professionalism vs. Political Loyalty: The hosts caution against transforming the military into a politically driven entity, drawing parallels to militaries of totalitarian states (09:17).
• Long-term Consequences: The breach could set a precedent for future security lapses and diminish global perceptions of the U.S. military's competence (10:14).

Notable Quotes:

David French [08:30]: "This is not the way any other soldier would be treated under similar circumstances." (08:30)

Jeffrey Goldberg [09:15]: "If you do that, if you make the American military more political than professional, then you make the American military more like the Russian military." (09:15)

---

Conclusion and Call to Action

French and Goldberg conclude by urging for a thorough investigation into the breach and the immediate suspension of responsible parties until accountability is ensured. They stress the importance of maintaining stringent security protocols to safeguard national interests and military integrity.

Key Points:

• Need for Transparency: Releasing the contents of the chat could provide clarity and restore public trust (06:31).
• Maintaining Standards: Emphasizing that consistent standards must apply to all, regardless of political affiliations, to preserve the military's professionalism (09:13).

Notable Quotes:

David French [07:57]: "If the present course of action holds, which is the administration tries to brush it off and holds no one to account..." (07:57)

Jeffrey Goldberg [09:17]: "And if you do that, you make the American military more like the Russian military." (09:17)

---

Final Thoughts

The episode of The Opinions presents a compelling analysis of a critical security lapse within the U.S. administration, emphasizing the need for accountability, transparency, and unwavering adherence to security protocols. By highlighting the potential ramifications of such breaches, French and Goldberg underscore the importance of preserving military professionalism over political maneuvering to ensure national security and maintain global military standards.

---

Timestamp References:

• 00:55 – Jeffrey Goldberg receives the group chat invitation.
• 02:04 – Importance of not sharing war plans.
• 02:36 – Potential actions by the Houthis.
• 03:01 – Consequences of missile launches.
• 04:27 – Call for thorough investigation.
• 05:51 – Pete Hegseth's attack on Goldberg.
• 07:10 – Impact of leadership hypocrisy.
• 08:19 – Issue of political motivations in military decisions.
• 09:17 – Comparison to other military structures.
• 10:14 – Long-term effects on military culture.

Note: The timestamps correspond to the points in the transcript where the quoted statements were made.

Transcript

[John Sandford]

Number one, New York Times best selling author John Sanford's latest thriller, Lethal Prey, is finally here. Detectives Lucas Davenport and Virgil Flowers join forces to track down a ruthless killer who will do whatever it takes to keep the past buried. Look for Lethal Prey, available from Putnam wherever books are sold.

[David French]

This is the Opinions, a show that brings you a mix of voices from New York Times opinion. You've heard the news, here's what to make of it.

I'm David French, I'm a columnist at.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

The New York Times, and I'm a.

[David French]

Former JAG officer and army lawyer. Earlier this week, we found out that.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Jeffrey Goldberg, who's the editor in chief of the Atlantic, received an invitation from.

[David French]

The National Security Advisor to join a signal group chat.

[Unnamed Official]

He was put on a group chat with several high ranking White House officials, and he received several messages discussing plans to bomb Houthi targets in Yemen.

He was texting attack plans when targets were going to be targeted, how they were going to be targeted, who was at the targets when the next sequence of attacks were happening.

[David French]

So this is an absolutely stunning breach of security. I've helped investigate numerous allegations of class information spillages, and I've never heard of anything this egregious. This is extraordinary.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

There are so many ways in which.

[David French]

Sharing war plans is among the most egregious forms of security breach. It's hard to think of a form of security breach that is worse than this. But even aside from that, there is now public insight into conversations that were meant to be private. You have the vice president questioning the.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Judgment of the president.

[David French]

You have the vice president laying into our allies. Now, I know that's something that they do publicly as well. But there's a difference between a public communication and a private communication.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

The private communication was never intended for the allies.

[David French]

So all of these things are damaging diplomatically, they're damaging politically, they're damaging militarily. And in the worst scenario, they could be catastrophically dangerous for American lives. Now, this should be obvious to people that sharing plans for an attack hours before an attack could create problems. But let's get a little bit more specific. So the Houthis could move some of.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Their weapons away from targeted locations. They could move senior officials away from.

[David French]

Targeted locations so that the strikes are less effective. They could choose to, for example, launch missiles themselves to attack before they are attacked.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

An action that could be incredibly costly.

[David French]

In lives and in ships, that there.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Have been ships damaged and sunk by.

[David French]

The Houthis so they could launch their.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Missiles, they could move their senior leaders.

[David French]

Now, the administration is saying that there was nothing classified in the chat, that they weren't really war plans in many.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Ways, casting aspersions on Jeffrey Goldberg's integrity.

[David French]

In fact, when Pete Hegseth was confronted with these facts, that Goldberg was in the signal chat, that he had put information into the signal chat about military plans, he attacked Goldberg and did not acknowledge his own wrongdoing. But there is not an officer alive.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Whose career would survive a security breach like this. This is something you know from the.

[David French]

Very first week that you're a member of the military. You start learning about operational security officers.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

This is drilled into them and drilled into them and drilled into them.

[David French]

And those consequences would be instant, instant relief from command. For example, I have seen this with my own eyes. I have been a part of this process. You would have a relief from command followed by a comprehensive investigation and potentially criminal charges. In the military, you would be advising an officer to seek counsel, to get a lawyer instantly, because the criminal investigation would be equally as instant in the civilian context. And Pete Hegseth is a civilian. This should be an immediate Department of.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Justice investigation into how this happened.

[David French]

Why there was the use of this Signal app, which the Pentagon has warned members of the military against using for DoD business. Why were they using the app? Who was on the chat? Were they posting in it directly? Were they posting through subordinates? How often is a sensitive business being conducted on Signal? There are so many questions that arise.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

That the Department of Justice should be answering.

[David French]

And I mentioned criminal charges. Federal law makes it a crime when a person, through gross negligence, removes information relating to the national defense from its proper place of custody and is delivered to anyone in violation of trust or is lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed. Now, it's way too soon to say whether Hexith's incompetence is also criminal, but I raise that possibility to demonstrate the sheer magnitude of the mistake. A security breach this significant requires thorough investigation. I can assure you that a signal chat is not the right place to share sensitive information about upcoming American strikes. The White House's spin is laughable. It's weak. Now, they have claimed that there were.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

No actual war plans shared.

[Pete Hegseth]

The attack was totally successful. It was, I guess, from what I understand, took place during. And it wasn't classified information. So this was not classified.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Pete Hegseth has attacked Jeffrey Goldberg, who.

[David French]

Has behaved incredibly responsibly in all of this.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

He did not share the national security information that came into his possession.

[David French]

He still has not shared it. This is a very responsible thing for a journalist to do, but he's been.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Attacked mercilessly, and then they minimize the information. They say it wasn't real war plans.

[David French]

Well, you know, if this is no.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Big deal, if these weren't real war plans, there's Move along, nothing to see here.

[David French]

Well, they could release what was on the chat so that Americans could see for themselves if this was significant, but so far they're not doing that. The way to handle security breach like this is to immediately, especially in the case of Pete Hexseth, suspend him from his duties pending investigation.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

I would say the same with the.

[David French]

National Security advisor who inadvertently brought Jeffrey.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Goldberg into the chat.

[David French]

You know, the only thing that bars.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Me from saying suspend everyone who's on.

[David French]

That chat is you would be hollowing out the administration in a time of real crisis globally. And let's just talk a little bit about credibility and standards.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Nothing destroys a leader's credibility with soldiers more thoroughly than hypocrisy or double standards.

[David French]

When leaders break the rules that they impose on soldiers, they break the bond.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Of trust between soldiers and commanders.

[David French]

So what example has Hegseth set? That he's politically loyal, but also that he's careless. And when you're careless in the military, people can die. And that's why I say if he has any honor at all, he will resign. The implications for our national security are grave. And the reason why I say that is I would urge listeners not to.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Look at this incident in isolation.

[David French]

If the present course of action holds, which is the administration tries to brush it off and holds no one to account, then what you've had is a.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Further reaffirmation that the American military is.

[David French]

Becoming a political military. So you had chairman of the Joint Chiefs, leading attorneys in the military, the JAG officers, JAG generals in the military.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Relieved for political reasons.

[David French]

Then you have the Secretary of Defense.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

Retained in spite of the fact that he violated every standard of operational security.

[David French]

In a way that would lead any other soldier to face dramatic consequences. He's still in office, and as of the moment of this recording, there seems to be no indication that he's either going to step down or be fired. So what does that say? It says that we're replacing standards of professionalism with standards of political loyalty. I have seen far greater consequences applied to service members for far lesser security breaches than the kind of hand waving that we're seeing now from the administration, where it's minimizing what occurred, denying that it's significant. This is not the way any other soldier would be treated under similar circumstances. But the rule is there's one standard.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

For maga, especially the MAGA loyalists, and.

[David French]

There'S other standards for everybody else.

[Jeffrey Goldberg]

And if you do that, if you.

[David French]

Make the American military more political than professional, then you make the American military more like the Russian military. You make the American military more like the military of totalitarian states. And as fearsome as many of those militaries can look on paper, I guarantee you political militaries, pound for pound, are much less effective, much less effective than professional militaries. And that's what some of these stakes are. The stakes are, what are we doing to the very culture of the United States military? Are we telling it that the days of professionalism are over and the days for political loyalty have begun?

If you like this show, follow it on Spotify, Apple, or wherever you get your podcasts. This show is produced by Derek Arthur, Sophia Alvarez, Boyd Vishaka Durba, Phoebe Lett, Christina Samulewski and Gillian Weinberger. It's edited by Kari Pitkin, Allison Bruzek and Annie Rose Strasser. Engineering, mixing and original music by Isaac Jones, sonia Herrero, Pat McCusker, Carol Saburo and Afim Shapiro. Additional music by Amin Sahota. The Fact Check team is Kate Sinclair, Mary, Marge Locker and Michelle Harris. Audience strategy by Shannon Busta, Christina Samuluski and Adrian Rivera. The executive producer of Times Opinion Audio is Annie Rose Dresser.