
Times columnist Thomas Friedman says this is a rare moment in the Middle East when “everything is in play and everything is possible." In this episode of The Opinions, he speaks to editor Dan Wakin about the forces brewing in the Middle East, what he expects of the relationship between Netanyahu and Trump and the one gig he would give up his column to try to do.
Loading summary
Indeed Advertiser
You just realized your business needed to hire someone yesterday. How can you find amazing candidates fast? Easy. Just use Indeed. Join the 3.5 million employers worldwide that use Indeed to hire great talent fast. There's no need to wait any longer. Speed up your hiring right now with Indeed and listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit. To get your jobs more visibility at indeed.com NYT just go to indeed.com NYT right now and support our show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. Indeed indeed.com NYT terms and conditions apply. Hiring Indeed is all you need.
Podcast Host
This is the Opinions, a show that brings you a mix of voices from New York Times Opinion. You've heard the news. Here's what to make of it.
Dan Waken
I'm Dan Waken, an international editor for New York Times Opinion.
Tom Friedman
I'm Tom Friedman, foreign affairs columnist for the New York Times.
Dan Waken
Tom, Donald Trump has now taken over the reins as president and I want to talk to you about the challenges around the globe that he's inheriting. Just this weekend we saw the release of hostages in Gaza and you wrote that the Middle east right now faces one of those rare moments when everything is in play and everything is possible. So let's dig into that a bit and then talk about some of the other challenges that Donald Trump faces on the foreign front. But to start, will you explain what you meant by this being a rare moment?
Tom Friedman
Well, it's really for the whole region because if you look around the horn, first of all, Lebanon is completely in play. They've just produced a new president, Joseph Aoun, and a new prime minister, Nawaf Salaam, both enormously popular, decent, moderate people who are committed to restoring Lebanon's unity and sovereignty. In Syria, Bashar Al Assad has been toppled and been replaced by a coalition basically of Islamist and secular forces. Syria now has a chance really to come back in effect from the dead. In Israel, Palestine, Gaza, you have basically now a ceasefire finally. And so the first really prolonged end to that war now is on the table. It's begun. How long it will last and whether it will lead to a permanent ceasefire is still in play. And then of course, the wider regional situation is Iran right now is militarily at its weakest point ever since it was in a sense stripped of its anti aircraft system by Israel. And the big question is, will the Trump administration opt for a knuckle breaking negotiation with Iran to in effect defuse and eliminate its nuclear program, or will it adopt a more kinetic option?
Dan Waken
Let me go back to the ceasefire for a second. What has to happen for this ceasefire to hold and then to succeed as something approaching a peace deal?
Tom Friedman
Well, it's basically a three part arrangement. The first is this 42 day ceasefire in which some Israeli hostages, both alive and dead, will be returned in return for hundreds of Palestinian security prisoners being held in Israeli jails. That's supposed to pave the way for stages two and three of negotiating a final ceasefire. Total Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and the return of all the other Israeli hostages, dead and alive, and more Palestinian security prisoners returned to the west bank in Gaza.
Dan Waken
What would you say Trump needs to do to make this succeed?
Tom Friedman
Well, as we sit here today, Dan, the Israeli press is full of reports that Netanyahu will just do the first stage of this deal and then look to resume the fighting, find some pretext by Hamas. Why is that? Because one, one of the far right Jewish supremacist parties that held up Netanyahu's government has already left the government over this deal. And the other, led by Betsell Smotrich, the Finance Minister, has promised to leave if Netanyahu actually goes ahead with a ceasefire and ends the war in Gaza. And reports in Israel, as Netanyahu has essentially told Smotrich to just be cool, Hamas will give Israel some excuse to restart the war. And Smotrich has called for, quote, unquote, total victory, whatever that means. Whenever I hear the word total victory, I'm always reminded of the fact that we are speaking today, close to the 58th anniversary of Israel's 1967 victory and take over the West Bank. And Israel still doesn't control the West bank after 58 years. So the idea that it will control Gaza in another six months, I think is a bit of a fantasy.
Dan Waken
Does Trump have any leverage here, Tom, in making sure this ceasefire and eventual deal is successful?
Tom Friedman
Good question, Dan. Will we already saw Trump use his leverage to force Netanyahu to actually accept the ceasefire, which he really did not want to do. But basically, Netanyahu spent a year running circles around Joe Biden. He will try the same with Trump, one can be sure. Will it work? Will it not? I really don't know. I think that's one of the big questions. My broader point is that Donald Trump's interests and aspirations in the Middle east, which are for a Saudi US Security treaty built around an Israeli Palestinian negotiation, a two state solution, that is Trump and America's overriding goal right now, is in fundamental contradiction with Bibi Netanyahu's political survival needs, which are to prevent any kind of deal between Israel and the Palestinian Authority that could be the foundation for a US Saudi security deal. And in terms of the longer term, I think Trump's approach to Netanyahu will be very simply, what have you done for me lately? This is all about me in America. It's not about you. I want to win a Nobel Prize, not the booby prize. And you are going to have to bend to my will.
Dan Waken
Well, in your view, Tom, do you think that approach could be more successful than President Biden's?
Tom Friedman
You know, Dan, when I was growing up in Minnesota, I used to go to the state fair as a young man. And there was a guy at the state fair who could guess your weight. And as a five year old boy, I was just amazed. How could he do it if he got it right? You know, he wants something, he got it wrong. You want something in the Middle east, people can guess your power from 100 miles away. And this is a brutal and pitiless landscape. And I have no doubt that Netanyahu is no illusions that at the end of the day he will have to submit to American interests. He will do his best to push back. I wouldn't doubt if he'll try to leverage evangelicals in the Republican Party to put pressure back on Trump. But this relationship, I just would not bet on it for the long term in terms of Netanyahu, Trump, because they're just fundamental structural disagreements to stay in power. Netanyahu is committed to never allowing the Palestinian Authority in the west bank to be a real partner for peace. And for Trump to succeed in America's regional interests, it requires Israel to open negotiations with the Palestinian Authority on that very two state solution. So something's going to have to give here, and my money's on Trump.
Dan Waken
I want to make sure that we touch on what the challenges are for the Trump administration in some of the countries that you mentioned. Very specifically, do you think the US should ease sanctions on Syria to give them a chance to start rebuilding? Or how should that happen? Should it be based on commitment to ensuring equal rights for minorities and women and openness to outside trade? What's your take on sanctions?
Tom Friedman
So, Dan, you know, Trump has nominated three Middle east envoys already over and above his Secretary of State. I'm actually thinking of sending him an open letter as a column saying, since you've got not three, I'd like to volunteer to be the fourth. Please don't tell our editor I said this. Now, I just want to do one thing. Not Gaza, not Israel, Palestine. Save that for the others, I would like to be the special envoy for Syria because Syria is the keystone of the Middle East. And I think the United States right now should be jumping in with both feet. Absolutely bear hugging the new Syrian leadership, eliminating our sanctions and doing everything we can possibly do to create the possibility of a very different kind of Syria, which is a consensual balance between Islamist forces there and secular modernist forces, both Christian and Muslim. The odds are very long, but it is the biggest prize in the Middle East.
Dan Waken
So let's pivot to China for a moment. President Trump invited President Xi Jinping of China to Washington for his inauguration. And you called that a good idea in your column. The two men spoke on Friday and President Trump called it a very good phone call. But Trump also has folks in his administration who are very hawkish on China. So we're taping this on Monday before we've heard about the extent of any tariffs on Chinese goods. But more broadly speaking, should China be hopeful or wary of a Trump administration?
Tom Friedman
Well, it's a good question, Dan, because it's a little of both. Trump is not dealing with the China that he dealt with four years ago. I was just in China and explained that China's taken a great leap forward in advanced manufacturing. You know, the last time I was in China, Xiaomi, the Chinese smartphone company, was just a phone company. I came back and they were a car company. When I was last in China, Huawei was a smartphone company. When I came back, they were a car company. That's the extent of the acceleration in China's move toward advanced manufacturing, particularly around electric vehicles. The Chinese decided that they were going to own the EV business. And why is that important? Because if China owns the all electric EV market, there's a very good chance it's going to own the future of driving. As my colleague and our colleague Keith Bradshaw said to me, in 10 years, America will become like Cuba, the place you go to visit old gas guzzling Buicks to see what cars used to be like. So this is a very, very, very important moment. And all that tariffs will do for you is buy time. That's all they do. But they don't buy you in EV industry. That takes a strategic investment. So when I hear Trump saying, I'm going to put tariffs on China's EV industry higher than ever, but we're going to go for big gas guzzlers here. That's a prescription for economic disaster.
Dan Waken
Tom, people are going to be hearing this episode on the first full day of the Trump administration and everyone talks about what he's going to do on day one. But I'd like to ask you, what would you like to see on day 366, let's say exactly one year from now?
Tom Friedman
I would like to see a president who has not overread his actually very slim margin of victory, who understands, I think, what the American people want most and the reason they elected him, that is to bring down inflation, to be a good partner with our traditional allies, to keep the world stable, and most of all, to make America work. I just recently visited China, Dan, and I noted that I took the bullet train from Beijing to Shanghai. It's four and a half hours and the distance between New York and Chicago. My colleague who I was riding with, Keith Bradshaw, said, you know, Tom, if you put a dime on the windowsill here on the train, it'll be still sitting there four and a half hours later when we pull into Shanghai. That's how smooth this train going, 210 to 15 miles an hour is. I just took the Acela from Washington to New York. You need to be a gymnast in order to go to the bathroom on the Acela because the car rocks so much as you go down the tracks. Really shame on us that we can't build just basic infrastructure. I think that's what Americans want. They sure as hell don't want four more years of trolling liberals and MAGA chest pumping. So I hope Trump understands that. If he does, you know, I will support those policies. If he doesn't, I will oppose them.
Dan Waken
Well, with that, Tom, thanks so much for talking.
Tom Friedman
Dan, always a pleasure.
Podcast Host
If you like this show, follow it on Spotify, Apple, or wherever you get your podcasts. This show is produced by Derek Arthur, Sofia Alvarez, Boyd Vishaka, Durba, Phoebe Lett, Christina Samulewski and Gillian Weinberger. It's edited by Kari Pitkin, Allison Bruzek and Annie Rose Strasser. Engineering, mixing and original music by Isaac Jones, sonia Herrero, Pat McCusker, Carol Saburo and Afim Shapiro. Additional music by Amin Sahota. The Fact Check team is Kate Sinclair, Mary, Marge Locker and Michelle Harris. Audience strategy by Shannon Busta, Christina Samulewski and Adrian Rivera. The executive producer of Times Opinion Audio is Annie Rose Dresser.
Podcast Summary: Thomas Friedman on "The Opinions"
Episode Title: Thomas Friedman: The Global Challenges Facing Trump
Host/Author: The New York Times Opinion
Release Date: January 21, 2025
Introduction
In this episode of The Opinions, Dan Waken, an international editor for New York Times Opinion, engages in a thought-provoking discussion with renowned foreign affairs columnist, Tom Friedman. The conversation delves into the myriad global challenges that the newly inaugurated President Donald Trump faces, with a particular focus on the Middle East, Syria, and China. The dialogue provides insightful analysis into geopolitical dynamics and U.S. foreign policy implications under the Trump administration.
Middle East: A Pivotal Moment
Dan Waken initiates the conversation by highlighting recent developments in the Middle East, specifically the release of hostages in Gaza. He references Friedman's observation that the region is experiencing a "rare moment when everything is in play and everything is possible" (01:03). Friedman elaborates on this by outlining several critical changes:
Lebanon's Political Shift: Lebanon has elected a new president, Joseph Aoun, and a new prime minister, Nawaf Salaam. Both leaders are described as "enormously popular, decent, moderate people committed to restoring Lebanon's unity and sovereignty" (01:36).
Syria's Potential Revival: The long-standing regime of Bashar Al Assad has been toppled, replaced by a coalition of Islamist and secular forces. Friedman posits that "Syria now has a chance really to come back in effect from the dead" (01:36).
Ceasefire in Israel-Palestine Conflict: A significant development is the initiation of a 42-day ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. Friedman discusses the multi-phase arrangement intended to pave the way for a lasting peace deal, emphasizing the uncertainty surrounding its permanence (03:04).
Ceasefire Mechanism and Challenges
Friedman breaks down the ceasefire into a three-part arrangement:
Immediate Ceasefire and Hostage Exchange: The first stage involves a 42-day cessation of hostilities, during which Israeli hostages will be exchanged for Palestinian security prisoners (03:04).
Negotiation for Final Ceasefire: The second stage focuses on negotiating a permanent ceasefire, contingent on total Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and the return of all remaining hostages and prisoners (03:04).
Long-term Peace Initiatives: The final stage aims to establish a sustainable peace framework between Israel and Palestine (03:04).
However, optimism is tempered by internal Israeli politics. Friedman notes that Prime Minister Netanyahu faces opposition from far-right factions unwilling to commit to a lasting peace, with Finance Minister Betsell Smotrich advocating for "total victory" (03:46). This internal discord poses significant obstacles to the success and durability of the ceasefire.
Trump’s Leverage and Relationship with Netanyahu
Dan Waken probes into President Trump's potential influence over the ceasefire's success. Friedman acknowledges Trump's leverage, referencing how Trump "forced Netanyahu to accept the ceasefire, which he really did not want to do" (05:07). However, he expresses skepticism about the longevity of this influence, comparing Netanyahu’s potential resistance to Trump’s leadership style.
Friedman highlights a fundamental conflict between Trump’s broader Middle Eastern aspirations—centered on a Saudi-US security treaty and a two-state solution—and Netanyahu’s political survival, which relies on preventing a substantive peace deal with the Palestinian Authority (06:22). He speculates that Netanyahu might leverage evangelical support within the Republican Party to counteract Trump’s policies, though he remains doubtful about the long-term viability of their alliance (06:27).
Sanctions and Syria: A Keystone of Stability
Transitioning to Syria, Friedman emphasizes its pivotal role in Middle Eastern stability. He advocates for the U.S. to engage proactively with Syria's new leadership, suggesting the elimination of sanctions to facilitate reconstruction and promote a consensual balance between Islamist and secular forces (08:12). Friedman underscores the importance of strategic investment over punitive measures, asserting that sanctions only "buy time" rather than fostering genuine economic and political progress (11:23).
U.S.-China Relations Under Trump
The conversation shifts to U.S.-China relations, sparked by President Trump's invitation to President Xi Jinping to Washington for his inauguration. Friedman views this outreach as a positive gesture but warns of underlying tensions due to the evolving nature of China's industrial capabilities. He contrasts his visit to China, where advanced manufacturing and electric vehicle (EV) industries have surged, with America's lagging infrastructure, exemplified by the Acela train's inefficiency compared to China's high-speed rail (09:49).
Friedman criticizes Trump's approach of imposing tariffs on China's EV sector while lacking a strategic investment in U.S. infrastructure. He predicts economic repercussions, citing that such policies contribute to America's potential decline in technological leadership and industrial prowess (09:49).
Vision for the One-Year Mark
Looking ahead, Tom Friedman shares his aspirations for the Trump administration one year into office. He hopes to see pragmatic governance focused on reducing inflation, strengthening alliances, stabilizing global relations, and improving domestic infrastructure. Drawing a parallel between China's efficient bullet trains and America's struggling Acela, Friedman emphasizes the need for substantial infrastructure investment as a priority over divisive political rhetoric and partisan conflicts (11:42).
Conclusion
The episode concludes with Dan Waken thanking Tom Friedman for his insightful analysis. Friedman reiterates his support for policies that align with improving America's economic and international standing, conditional upon Trump's administration prioritizing constructive governance over political maneuvering (13:10).
Notable Quotes
Tom Friedman on Lebanon's Leadership:
"They've just produced a new president, Joseph Aoun, and a new prime minister, Nawaf Salaam, both enormously popular, decent, moderate people who are committed to restoring Lebanon's unity and sovereignty." (01:36)
On the Ceasefire Arrangements:
"It’s basically a three part arrangement... which is supposed to pave the way for stages two and three of negotiating a final ceasefire." (03:04)
Friedman's Skepticism of Netanyahu's Commitment:
"I think that's a bit of a fantasy." (04:58)
On Trump’s Influence:
"Trump’s approach to Netanyahu will be very simply, what have you done for me lately... And you are going to have to bend to my will." (05:07)
On U.S.-China Economic Strategies:
"When I hear Trump saying, I’m going to put tariffs on China’s EV industry higher than ever... That's a prescription for economic disaster." (09:49)
Vision for Future Policy:
"I would like to see a president who has not overread his actually very slim margin of victory... and most of all, to make America work." (11:42)
Final Thoughts
Tom Friedman's comprehensive analysis offers a nuanced perspective on the intricate global challenges confronting President Trump. From the fragile peace in the Middle East to the strategic imperatives in U.S. relations with China, Friedman underscores the complexity and interdependence of international affairs. His insights advocate for pragmatic policies and strategic investments to navigate the evolving geopolitical landscape effectively.
Timestamp Reference
For precise quotations and context, refer to the timestamps provided alongside each quote.