Podcast
The True Crime Tapes pulls you into the shadowy depths of the criminal underworld, where the line between justice and chaos is razor-thin. Each episode dissects the minds of history’s most infamous serial killers, unravels the inner workings of organized crime syndicates, and investigates baffling missing person cases that still haunt the public’s imagination. From the bloody reign of ruthless mob bosses to the chilling patterns of elusive predators, True Crime Time delivers gripping, deeply researched storytelling that leaves no stone unturned.
With a relentless pursuit of truth, True Crime Time goes beyond the headlines, diving into the psychology, motives, and investigations behind the world’s most shocking crimes. You’ll hear firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and rare archival material that shed new light on cases both well-known and obscure. Whether it’s the brutality of cartel wars, the sinister precision of serial murderers, or the eerie last-known moments of vanished souls, this podcast brings you face-to-face with the darker side of human.
Every week, True Crime Time takes you on a journey through the twisted corridors of crime, guided by immersive storytelling and chilling attention to detail. Expect heart-pounding narratives, intricate conspiracy threads, and unsettling truths that will leave you questioning everything you thought you knew. If you crave the rush of uncovering the darkest mysteries, brace yourself—because in this world, the truth is often stranger, and far more terrifying, than fiction.
The True Crime Tapes
Hosted by Bobby Capucci · EN
The True Crime Tapes pulls you into the shadowy depths of the criminal underworld, where the line between justice and chaos is razor-thin. Each episode dissects the minds of history’s most infamous serial killers, unravels the inner workings of organized crime syndicates, and investigates baffling missing person cases that still haunt the public’s imagination. From the bloody reign of ruthless mob bosses to the chilling patterns of elusive predators, True Crime Time delivers gripping, deeply researched storytelling that leaves no stone unturned.
With a relentless pursuit of truth, True Crime Time goes beyond the headlines, diving into the psychology, motives, and investigations behind the world’s most shocking crimes. You’ll hear firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and rare archival material that shed new light on cases both well-known and obscure. Whether it’s the brutality of cartel wars, the sinister precision of serial murderers, or the eerie last-known moments of vanished souls, this podcast brings you face-to-face with the darker side of human.
Every week, True Crime Time takes you on a journey through the twisted corridors of crime, guided by immersive storytelling and chilling attention to detail. Expect heart-pounding narratives, intricate conspiracy threads, and unsettling truths that will leave you questioning everything you thought you knew. If you crave the rush of uncovering the darkest mysteries, brace yourself—because in this world, the truth is often stranger, and far more terrifying, than fiction.
774episodes
Episodes
Newest firstAll episodes
Kathy Ruemmler And Her Epstein Related Transcript From Her Trip To Congress (Part 4) (8/5/26)
2d ago00:12:30Tap to summarizeKathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf
Transcribe →Kathy Ruemmler And Her Epstein Related Transcript From Her Trip To Congress (Part 3) (8/5/26)
2d ago00:14:51Tap to summarizeKathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf
Transcribe →Murder In Moscow: Greg Rauch Appointed to Represent Bryan Kohberger By The State Of Idaho (8/5/26)
2d ago00:10:52Tap to summarizeBryan Kohberger was appointed a new attorney to represent him as he attempts to withdraw the guilty plea that resulted in four consecutive life sentences for the murders of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Moscow-based attorney Greg Rauch was selected through the Idaho State Public Defender’s Alternate Counsel Division because Kohberger’s claims involve allegations against his original publicly funded defense team, creating a potential conflict of interest. Rauch said he had not yet reviewed the enormous case file or spoken extensively with Kohberger but planned to examine the police reports, court records and allegations contained in Kohberger’s handwritten petition for post-conviction relief.Kohberger claimed that his former attorneys pressured him into falsely confessing, misrepresented what he would experience on death row and failed to fully explain potentially favorable evidence, including hair reportedly recovered from Ethan Chapin’s hand. Those allegations sharply contradicted Kohberger’s sworn statements during his 2025 plea hearing, when he acknowledged killing the four students and repeatedly told Judge Steven Hippler that his pleas were voluntary. His waiver of a direct appeal did not prevent him from filing for post-conviction relief, but overturning the plea would require him to prove serious constitutional failures by his former lawyers. Should he succeed, the murder case could return to court for a trial, and prosecutors could once again seek the death penalty.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger appointed new attorney after he files for post-conviction relief | Fox News
Transcribe →Congress Moves to Give the Epstein Files Law Real Enforcement Power (8/5/26)
3d ago00:11:01Tap to summarizeA bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced the Epstein Files Transparency Act II after the Justice Department repeatedly missed deadlines and faced accusations that its releases under the original law were incomplete, heavily redacted and improperly exposed survivors’ personal information while concealing the identities of men potentially connected to Epstein’s abuse. The proposed legislation would give survivors, members of Congress, state attorneys general and local prosecutors standing to sue the Justice Department for failing to release required records. It would also allow survivors to obtain complete, unredacted records concerning their own cases and give state and local authorities access to materials needed for investigations and prosecutions, including classified information through secure channels.The new bill was designed to add enforcement powers that critics said were missing from the original Epstein Files Transparency Act, including potential criminal penalties for Justice Department or FBI officials who knowingly concealed, destroyed, falsified or withheld records. Legal experts said the legislation could become a significant tool for survivors and state investigators, but questioned whether it could attract enough votes in Congress, whether President Donald Trump would sign it and whether another law would actually force cooperation from the same Justice Department accused of resisting disclosure. Supporters, including Thomas Massie, Ro Khanna, Jeff Merkley, Ben Ray Luján and Teresa Leger Fernández, argued that stronger legal consequences were necessary because the administration had failed to comply fully with the original transparency mandate.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Transcribe →Epstein Truth Commission Drawn Into New Mexico’s Political Fight (8/5/26)
3d ago00:13:11Tap to summarizeNew Mexico Senate Republicans, led by Minority Leader Bill Sharer, called on the state’s bipartisan Epstein Survivors’ Truth Commission to subpoena Democratic gubernatorial candidate Deb Haaland and U.S. Rep. Melanie Stansbury. Sharer pointed to a 2014 campaign flight Haaland took on an aircraft arranged through Epstein and to an alleged connection between one of Stansbury’s former employers and Ghislaine Maxwell. Haaland’s campaign said she never interacted with Epstein and did not know how the flight had been arranged, while Stansbury categorically denied having any relationship with Epstein or Maxwell and said she was willing to testify. Independent reporting had also found that the aircraft Haaland used was not Epstein’s personal plane, undercutting Sharer’s more inflammatory characterization of the trip.Sharer framed the subpoena request as a test of whether the commission was genuinely nonpartisan, but his motivation deserved skepticism. The commission had been created to investigate alleged abuse, institutional failures and public corruption connected to Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, yet Sharer’s demands focused heavily on two prominent Democrats, including one running for governor, while relying on connections that appeared indirect or disputed. Seeking testimony from anyone with potentially relevant knowledge was reasonable, but describing Haaland as having flown on “Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet” and suggesting that Stansbury had meaningful Epstein ties went beyond what the publicly established facts supported. That made the effort look at least partly like an attempt to weaponize the Epstein investigation for partisan advantage rather than a narrowly tailored effort to uncover what happened at Zorro Ranch and why authorities failed to act.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Transcribe →The DOJ Continues To Refuse To Turn Over Epstein Documents To The State Of New Mexico (8/5/26)
3d ago00:12:43Tap to summarizeThe Justice Department has still not turned over the unredacted Jeffrey Epstein records requested by New Mexico investigators, missing a July 31 deadline imposed by state Attorney General Raúl Torrez. New Mexico reopened its criminal investigation into allegations of sexual abuse and trafficking at Epstein’s Zorro Ranch earlier this year, but the federal government has provided only 31 pages of largely useless material, including heavily redacted records, previously public documents and photocopies of local news reports. Torrez says the withheld files potentially contain the identities of survivors, witnesses, co-conspirators and other individuals who could help investigators determine what crimes occurred at the ranch and whether anyone can still be prosecuted.The standoff is especially troubling because New Mexico says it suspended its original investigation in 2019 after reaching an agreement with the Southern District of New York, which was supposed to share evidence gathered during the federal Epstein investigation. State officials now say the federal government never honored that commitment. Although the DOJ argues that federal law, court orders and privacy protections prevent it from releasing millions of unredacted documents, New Mexico maintains that prosecutors could seek modifications to protective orders and securely provide the relevant evidence to state law enforcement. Torrez has accused the department of obstructing the investigation and has left open the possibility of taking legal action to force the federal government to cooperate.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:
Transcribe →Mega Edition: Prince Andrew And The Most Ridiculous Of His Excuses (8/5/26)
3d ago00:51:44Tap to summarizePrince Andrew offered a series of explanations for why Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s allegations could not be true, but many of them only intensified public skepticism. During his disastrous 2019 BBC Newsnight interview, Andrew said he had no recollection of meeting Giuffre and claimed he had been at a Pizza Express in Woking with his daughter on the night she said they had been together. His most widely ridiculed explanation concerned Giuffre’s description of him sweating heavily while dancing. Andrew insisted that he could not have been sweating because a medical condition, supposedly connected to his service in the Falklands War, had temporarily left him unable to perspire. Rather than discrediting Giuffre’s account, the unusual and unsupported explanation became one of the defining moments of the interview.Equally damaging was Andrew’s attempt to cast doubt on the photograph showing him with his arm around Giuffre’s waist inside Ghislaine Maxwell’s London home. Although he acknowledged that the man in the picture appeared to be him, he questioned whether the image had been manipulated and pointed to details such as the position of his hand and the clothing he was wearing. The argument was difficult to reconcile with his insistence that he had no memory of meeting Giuffre, because he was simultaneously denying the encounter while trying to explain why the photographic evidence might not be genuine. Later disclosures reportedly provided further support for the photograph’s authenticity, making Andrew’s efforts to dismiss it appear even less credible. Together, the sweating defense and the attack on the photograph transformed his denials from a legal and reputational strategy into symbols of how implausible his broader account had become.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Transcribe →Mega Edition: The Epstein/Maxwell Court Documents Are Littered With "John Does" (8/4/26)
3d ago00:45:17Tap to summarizeCourt records involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were filled for years with anonymous labels such as “John Doe,” “Jane Doe” and numbered variations of those names. The pseudonyms appeared most prominently in records from Virginia Giuffre’s defamation lawsuit against Maxwell, where depositions, emails, motions and exhibits discussed dozens of people whose identities remained sealed. Some were survivors entitled to privacy, while others were witnesses, employees, social acquaintances, public figures or people accused of participating in or having knowledge of Epstein’s activities. The widespread redactions made the records difficult to follow and allowed speculation to grow over who was being protected and why. It is important, however, to distinguish between people accused of misconduct and those whose names appeared only because they crossed paths with Epstein or were mentioned during testimony.Successive rounds of unsealing and the broader releases commonly known as the Epstein files eventually connected some of those anonymous designations to real names. Judge Loretta Preska’s court-ordered release of records beginning in January 2024 removed many of the “J. Doe” protections in the Giuffre-Maxwell litigation, exposing the identities of people who had previously appeared only as numbers or initials. Later federal releases under the Epstein Files Transparency Act placed millions of additional pages from the Epstein and Maxwell investigations into the public record, with the Justice Department stating that notable individuals and politicians were not to be redacted merely because of their status. The disclosures did not prove that every newly identified person committed a crime, but they helped reconstruct conversations, relationships and allegations that had been obscured for years behind anonymous placeholders.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Transcribe →Mega Edition: Jane Doe 17 And Her Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (8/5/26)
3d ago01:10:56Tap to summarizeJane Doe 17, who filed a lawsuit against the estate of Jeffrey Epstein, alleges that Epstein began grooming and sexually abusing her in 2008, when she was 26 years old and working in Florida. According to her complaint, Epstein, with assistance from Ghislaine Maxwell, lured her into his circle through promises of career help and lavish gifts. He then trafficked her across multiple locations—including Florida and New York—where she endured repeated rape, coercion, and threats that left her fearing for her life, including a chilling threat of being “fed to alligators” if she spoke out. Doe also claims she was forced to recruit other victims and that these abuses were photographed and videotaped to ensure her silence. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)
Transcribe →Murder In Moscow: The IGG Closed Hearing Transcripts (Part 8)
3d ago00:13:53Tap to summarizeOn January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl
Transcribe →