Breaking: Major Corruption Exposed as Governors Demand Refund for American Citizens

Summary

---

Podcast Summary: The Parnas Perspective

Episode: Breaking: Major Corruption Exposed as Governors Demand Refund for American Citizens
Host: Aaron Parnas
Date: February 20, 2026

---

Overview

In this urgent episode, Aaron Parnas breaks down explosive new details regarding a potential corruption scheme tied to Trump-era tariffs, involving former Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and his family's financial interests. The Supreme Court’s landmark decision overturning Trump’s tariffs has triggered political and legal shockwaves. Several U.S. governors, led by Illinois’ J.B. Pritzker and California’s Gavin Newsom, are now demanding multi-billion dollar refunds for their citizens. In addition, Parnas shares insights from a timely interview with Congresswoman Sarah McBride (D-DE) on the implications of the ruling, the state of the U.S. economy, and the Democrats’ affordability agenda ahead of the midterms.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Corruption Allegations Tied to Trump’s Tariffs

[00:23–05:48]

• Howard Lutnick and Cantor Fitzgerald:
  • Aaron Parnas reveals that Cantor Fitzgerald, formerly chaired by Howard Lutnick (Trump’s Commerce Secretary), has been buying rights to future tariff refunds from U.S. companies—poised to cash in if the tariffs are overturned.
  • Although Lutnick is no longer at Cantor Fitzgerald, his sons still play a major role; the firm is ready to trade up to several hundred million dollars' worth of these “refund rights” at 20–30% of the potential reimbursement value.
  • Critics label this move potentially unethical, given Lutnick’s prior support for tariffs and close Trump administration ties.

Quote [Aaron, 02:14]:
“Despite Lutnick’s outspoken support for tariffs, Cantor Fitzgerald has drawn scrutiny after reports said it would explore deals that would let investors profit if Trump’s tariffs were struck down in court...”

• Supreme Court Decision Impact:
  • The Supreme Court has ruled Trump’s tariffs unconstitutional, deepening criticism against the administration and setting the stage for mass refund claims.

---

2. Governors Demand Refunds for Citizens

[03:31–05:47]

• Letter from Governor J.B. Pritzker (IL):
  • Pritzker formally demands a $1,700 refund per household for Illinois residents, totaling over $8 billion, and threatens further action if the White House does not comply.
  • Parnas reads directly from the letter, highlighting the political and financial stakes.

Quote [Letter excerpt, 04:00]:
"President Trump, your tariff taxes wreaked havoc on farmers, enraged our allies and sent grocery prices through the roof… I demand a refund of $1,700 for every family in Illinois."

• Governor Gavin Newsom (CA):
  • Newsom echoes demands for immediate repayment, condemning tariffs as “an illegal cash grab that drove up prices and hurt working families.”

Quote [Parnas quoting Newsom, 04:55]:
“Every dollar unlawfully taken must be refunded immediately with interest. Cough up.”

---

3. Interview: Congresswoman Sarah McBride on Tariffs & Economic Fallout

[05:48–13:55]

a. Reaction to Supreme Court Ruling

• Illegality of Trump’s Tariffs:
  • McBride emphasizes that Trump’s yearlong tariff scheme raised costs for Americans and was flatly illegal. The Supreme Court affirmed congressional authority over permanent tariffs.

Quote [McBride, 06:07]:
“Donald Trump has imposed a reckless nationwide tariff sales tax on the American people... They were illegal. And I and my colleagues in Congress have been making that clear.”

b. Economic Consequences & Ongoing Instability

• Impact on Small Businesses:
  • Tariffs have hindered small business investment and planning, increasing costs, reducing jobs and innovation. Even with the ruling, Trump moves to impose fresh temporary tariffs, perpetuating uncertainty.

Quote [McBride, 07:50]:
“His erratic tariff policy has not only increased costs on them, but made it so that they can’t invest, so they can’t predict, so they can’t plan—which means fewer jobs, fewer innovations...”

c. Democrats’ Affordability Agenda

• Care Economy Task Force:
  • McBride outlines the Democrats' plan to lower living costs, focusing on universal pre-K, paid family/medical leave, affordable childcare, and elder care—making these rights the law of the land.

Quote [McBride, 09:44]:
“For too long, working people have had to choose between their job and their family, between their paycheck and their health. And I do not believe that...the ability to get care should be a matter of luck. I believe it should be the law of the land.”

d. Prospects for the 2026 State of the Union

• Attendance & National Mood:
  • McBride is undecided about attending Trump’s State of the Union, balancing her constituents’ representation with opposition to Trump’s “room full of sycophants.”
  • She strongly asserts the Union is “not strong” citing broken promises, rising costs, and escalating international tensions.

Quote [McBride, 12:42]:
“Not only do I believe that the State of our Union is not strong, the vast majority of the American people do not believe that the State of our Union is strong. This president is historically unpopular at this point...His policies...have increased costs for the American people, making the American dream more unaffordable.”

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On the scale of the scandal:

  “This in a lot of ways has been viewed unethical by ethics experts. Democrats, many more now.”
  — Aaron Parnas [03:13]

• Governors’ coordinated action:

  "Past due. Delinquent. These tariffs were nothing more than an illegal cash grab that drove up prices and hurt working families..."
  — Reading from governors’ statements [04:50]

• Congresswoman McBride's sharp critique:

  "...this President has some sort of weird infatuation with tariffs, consequences and the law be damned.”
  — Rep. Sarah McBride [06:40]

---

Timeline & Timestamps

• Tariff Scandal Breakdown & Howard Lutnick’s Involvement: [00:23–05:48]
• Governors’ Refund Demands & Letter Excerpts: [03:31–05:47]
• Interview: Sarah McBride on Ruling, Economic Impact, and Democratic Plans: [05:48–13:55]

---

Tone & Presentation

Aaron Parnas delivers the episode in his signature, urgent “breaking news” style—clear, energetic, and analytically sharp. Congresswoman McBride’s tone is direct, passionate, and at times combative regarding the administration’s actions and policies.

---

Conclusion

This high-stakes episode uncovers alleged financial schemes linked to Trump’s tariffs as political and legal repercussions unfold in real time. As Democratic governors and Congress members mobilize for refunds and accountability, the episode provides critical context and forward-looking analysis—highlighting the fierce battle over ethics, economic justice, and the future of American policy.

Recommended for anyone tracking U.S. politics, government accountability, or the intersecting worlds of law and power.

Transcript

[A]

From unsolved mysteries to unexplained phenomena, from comedy gold to relationship fails, Amazon Music's got the most ad free top podcasts included with prime because the only thing that should interrupt your listening is, well, nothing. Download the Amazon Music app Today.

[B]

We have some major news concerning Donald Trump's tariffs, Epstein and more. Howard Lutnick, Donald Trump's Commerce Secretary, his sons, his family may be in for a major payout. We're learning now because, well, they bet that the Supreme Court would overturn Trump's tariffs and they may soon get a major payout. And critics and ethics experts are sounding the alarm. Meanwhile, governors across the country are sending invoices to the White House demanding that the White House give their people a tariff refund in the amount of $1,700 in some cases. Meanwhile, in the United Kingdom, accountability for the Epstein files continues to grow as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor will soon be removed from the lineage, the line of succession to be the next king of the United Kingdom. Make sure to like, comment, share and subscribe. This is an important update. The more you like, the more people see. Subscribe to my substack. Click the link below to support my work. Now, I want to tell you what is happening this evening because we're learning about a massive possible corruption scheme involving Howard Lutnick and his sons. So earlier this year, or rather last year, it was reported that Howard Lutnick that traders at the firm's investment banking subsidiary, Cantor Fitzgerald and Company said that they have the capacity to buy the rights to hundreds of millions of dollars in potential refunds from companies who have paid Trump's tariffs. So Howard Lutnick is no longer part of Cantor Fitzgerald, but his sons are. This used to be Howard Lutnick's company and essentially they said that they had the capacity to buy rights to potential refunds from companies, essentially 20 to 30% of the value of the refund. And despite Lutnick's outspoken support for tariffs, Cantor Fitzgerald has drawn scrutiny after reports said it would explore deals that would let investors profit if Trump's tariffs were struck down in court by buying rights to potential refunds. So in a letter reviewed by Wired, a Cantor representative reportedly said the firm was willing to trade tariff refund rights for 20 to 30% of the duties companies have paid. So for a company that paid $10 million, they would expect to receive 2 to 3 million dollars in a trade. We have the capacity to trade up to several hundred million of these presently and can likely upsize that in the future to meet potential demand. The letter also stated we've already put a trade through representing about $10 million of IPA rights. This the national emergency declaration under which Trump declared these tariffs and anticipate that number will balloon in the coming weeks, cantor Fitzgerald told the magazine in a statement at the time. Cantor is not in the business business of positioning any risk or taking views in litigation claims against tariffs. But that doesn't appear to be fully true. And well, well, that, that is significant. That is significant, especially if it's true. We're still learning more information about whether or not it is true. But there are, there is mass outreach, mass outreach because this in a lot of ways has been viewed unethical by ethics experts. Democrats, many more now. At the same time this afternoon, Democratic governors across the country are demanding a refund. This is a letter sent from Governor J.B. pritzker to Donald Trump. Now it's hard to read small I'm going to blow it up for you momentarily. But the letter essentially demands a refund for the tariffs. Quote President Trump, your tariff taxes wreaked havoc on farmers, enraged our allies and sent grocery prices through the roof. This morning your hand picked Supreme Court justices notified you that they are also unconstitutional. On behalf of the people of Illinois, I demand a refund of $1700 for every family in Illinois. There are 5,105,448 households in my state. Bring the total damages you owe to over $8 billion. The Supreme Court has ruled that this is yet one more unconstitutional act by you and your administration. This letter and the attached invoice stand as official notice that compensation is owed to the people of Illinois and if you do not comply, we will pursue further action. This is the official notice. It says past due delinquent. Governor Newsom said something similar. Time to pay the piper, Donald. These tariffs were nothing more than an illegal cash grab that drove up prices and hurt working families so you could wreck long standing alliances and extort them. Every dollar unlawfully taken must be refunded immediately with interest. Cough up. This afternoon I spoke with Congresswoman Sarah McBride from Delaware about tariffs and about affordability because this is the key issue right now in the United States Congress. Now we also spoke about the State of the Union and a quick plug. Next week, Tuesday, February 24th, I'll be at the People's State of the Union. I'll cover Donald Trump's speech for you so you don't have to watch it. But I'll also be covering this alternative State of the Union speech with over a dozen Members of Congress on the ground for you in partnership with midas, touch and move on. So stay tuned for that. Make sure to like, comment, share and subscribe. Here is my interview with Congresswoman McBride. I am super excited today to be joined by Congresswoman Sarah McBride. Now, Congresswoman, I really just want to jump right into it and get your reaction to the big news of the day, which is the tariffs decision from the Supreme Court. Republicans and Donald Trump have decried the decision. Democrats have championed the decision. What comes next and what's your reaction?

[C]

Well, first of all, let's reflect on the fact that for the last year, Donald Trump has imposed a reckless nationwide tariff sales tax on the American people. He has raised costs by his own actions. They were not only reckless though, they were illegal. And I and my colleagues in Congress have been making that clear. But today the Supreme Court affirms that these tariffs were illegal, that Congress and Congress alone can implement these types of wide scale, semi permanent tariffs. And it's no surprise that Donald Trump has been violating the law. He's been violating the law left and right. But what is so egregious about this is that these illegal tariffs have raised prices for the American people. They've raised costs for businesses and they've done it because this President has some sort of weird infatuation with tariffs, consequences and the law be damned. Now I was just going to say Donald Trump now had this, this, this press conference which was basically like a SNL cold open where he has decided to impose 150 day long tariffs under another law which not only don't achieve the goals that, that he has stated they are seeking to achieve, but just cause further chaos, further increase in price and further instability in our economy that we will all pay the price for.

[B]

Well, so I do want to ask you a little bit more about the economic effects because I think a lot of Americans across the country, especially small business owners today, cheered for a second and then they saw, well, we're going to get some more tariffs. So what's your message to them today? Who's, I mean, the economy is really in a lot of ways unstable.

[C]

Well, that's exactly right. I mean, one of the things that I have been hearing over the last year with Donald Trump's tariffs is that for businesses of all sizes, but particularly small businesses, his erratic tariff policy has not only increased costs on them, but, but made it so that they can't invest, so that they can't predict, so they can't plan, which means fewer jobs, fewer innovations, fewer investments here in the United States. And so this has been the reality for a year already. The Supreme Court has put a stop to the tariffs that he implemented, but now he's trying to seek to use another law to impose temporary tariffs, 10% across the board around the world, which again, not only increases cost, but means that businesses can continue to no longer plan. They don't know what's going to happen after the 150 days. There's no ability to predict. And that means fewer jobs, fewer investments, fewer innovations, and higher costs on consumers.

[B]

Now, many people don't know this, but you are the chair of the new Dems Care Economy Task Force, and you all recently put out an affordability agenda heading into the midterm election. Could you talk a little bit more about what Americans can expect if Democrats were to take over the House of Representatives in terms of affordability?

[C]

Sure. Well, we have been crystal clear across our caucus that our number one priority is lowering the cost of living for the American people. It's building an economy that works for everyone, not just the wealthy few and the wealthy few who donate to Donald Trump. And I was really proud to help lead the work of the this task force specifically focused on our care economy. And the care economy, that sounds abstract, but in reality that means affordable child care, including universal pre k. It means paid family and medical leave nationwide. And it means elder care and home care that our families and our seniors can rely on to be able to get the care that they need to live in their own community and in their own home. And for too long, this country has under invested in the care economy. For too long, working people have had to choose between their job and their family, between their paycheck and their health. And I do not believe that in the wealthiest, most developed nation on earth, the time and ability to get care should be a matter of luck. I believe it should be the law of the land. And so this is a bold care economy agenda that would propose universal nationwide paid family and medical leave, similar to the legislation that I passed here in Delaware in the Delaware General Assembly. It would guarantee more access to childcare that is affordable and accessible for families. And it would ensure that we invest in our home and elder care system because here in Delaware, we've got an aging population. That's true across the country. It's particularly true in Delaware. And we know that health outcomes are better and healthcare costs are lower when people are able to to get the care they need and age in place within their communities with the dignity of being at home. And so I'm excited about this, this proposal, because it is bold. It unites the entirety of our caucus. And it's not just compassionate, but it's competitive. Every other industrialized nation has been grappling with these challenges and these impossible choices for decades. The United States is far beyond behind them. And if we do this, it doesn't guarantee. It not only guarantees that working people don't have to sacrifice their financial security in the face of these inevitable life events, it also guarantees that we're actually able to tap the full potential and talents of everyone in our society so that people can start a family and stay in their job all at the same time.

[B]

Well, I think next week you're going to hear a very different agenda from the president. During the State of the Union address. I got to ask you first, are you planning on attending this State of the Union?

[C]

I'm still making up my mind. I know that there's some counter programming that's being offered. I also know that Donald Trump loves nothing more to be in a room full of sycophants. And so I'm still trying to make up my mind about exactly what I'm going to do. This is a seat. I represent the entirety of Delaware, and I'm very mindful that the seat that I have in Congress is representing the entirety of my state. And if I seated in that moment, there is no one from the House representing the entirety of Delaware there. So I'm still trying to make up my mind. But I know what I don't want, and that's I don't want Donald Trump in a room full of people who are just applauding for him.

[B]

Well, I think something that went in past State of the Unions, almost every single one, the president gets up there and says the State of our Union is strong. Do you believe that to be the case this year?

[C]

Not only do I believe that the State of our Union is not strong, the vast majority of the American people do not believe that the State of our Union is strong. This president is historically unpopular at this point, and that is because he has broken the promises he made throughout the last campaign. He said we would see fewer wars. He said we would see peace around the world. We see greater conflict and potentially more war, including more war in the Middle East. We've got a larger presence going toward Iran right now than we have seen in the Middle east from the United states since after 9, 11. He said he would lower costs on day one. His policies, as we already talked about, have increased costs for the American people, especially on the issues that that matter most to them for their groceries, for their housing, for their energy bills. His policies are making life more expensive and making the American dream more unaffordable and inaccessible for people. And so no, I don't think the state of our Union is strong. And I don't think the vast majority of the American people think it's strong either.

[B]

Congresswoman, thank you for taking a few minutes this evening.

[C]

Thank you.

[B]

Hey folks, thanks so much for watching. Feel free to add this podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or anywhere you watch for the latest breaking news and daily hits throughout the day. Make sure to follow subscribe. See you soon for more.

[D]

We're lost. I'm gonna pull over and ask that man for directions.

[C]

Hi there.

[D]

We're looking to get to the campground.

[E]

Well, you're gonna take a left at the old oak tree end of this here road. No, I'm just kidding. Let me get my phone out.

[D]

How are you getting a signal out here?

[E]

T Mobile and US Cellular decided to merge. So the network out here is huge. We're getting the same great signal as the city and saving a boatload with all the benefits. Oh, and a five year price guarantee. Okay, here's those directions.

[D]

Actually, can you point us in the direction of a T Mobile store?

[A]

America's best network just got bigger. Switch to T Mobile today and get built in benefits the other guys leave out plus our five year price guarantee. And now T Mobile is available in US Cellular stores.

[F]

Best Mobile Network Based on analysis by Ukulele speed test intelligence data 2H 2025 bigger network the combination of T Mobile's and US Cellular's network footprints will enhance the T Mobile network's coverage price guarantee on talk, text and data exclusions like taxes and fees apply. See t mobile.com for.