← The Parnas Perspective
The Parnas Perspective
Breaking: More Bombshell Epstein Files Released as White House Panics About Trump’s Future
00:19:26
Loading summary
Transcript14 lines
- [00:00]
A
We have significant developments this evening. More bombshell Epstein files have been revealed. I've spent the afternoon digging probably close to over 100,000 Epstein files that I've gone through already. And well, there are some serious ones that we need to talk about. Referring to Elon Musk, referring to Donald Trump Jr. Files suggesting that the Department of Justice's story on whether or not Epstein committed suicide and killed himself or are accurate. Questions are now being raised and major redaction errors that really expose the fact that this DOJ is failing at its job. And at the same time, the White House is urgently asking Americans to move away from this. Donald Trump wants folks not to talk about Epstein. The White House is saying move on. The Department of Justice is saying case closed. And, and well, pressure is building on Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanch and Attorney General Pam Bondi ahead of next week's critical hearing in which Pam Bondi will testify on Capitol Hill in front of the House Judiciary Committee. Let's just jump right in. But before I do, as always, like comment, share and subscribe, people need to see this. So make sure to like this video. The more you like, the more people will see. And subscribe to my substack by clicking the link below. Helps me stay caffeinated and stay sane. Honestly, at this point. Let's just jump right in because I want to talk about these files that we found this afternoon and I want to start with probably one of the biggest bombshells in the entire files. This one. Quote, do you remember the name of the gynecologist that you used to send your victims to? That is from an email that the New York Times has previously reported is associated with Mark Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein's brother. Jeffrey Epstein writes in response, quote, New York question mark, ask yourselves this. Why is that name redacted in the two when the email below is not redacted? Presumably the email above has Mark Epstein and then the the email and so they redacted that name when in reality you can just trace this email to kind of figure out whose it is. That's what the Times did. But this is a clear back and forth from 2012 where they are discussing, quote, victims, Epstein's victims back in 2012. And Mark Epstein has not been subpoenaed by any House Oversight committee or any Judiciary committee. No one's demanding more answers from him. He doesn't have some type of privilege here. Why not? Why is that redacted? Let's continue. New emails also show very disturbing back and forth. This is they're both redacted seemingly one is Jeffrey Epstein. And I'll show you why in a second. But they talk about, quote, your child has not arrived. She's in the house. They're actively talking in these, in this email chain about children, about moving young children from one place to another. This is horrific. And this is just the first page of what was a lengthy, lengthy back and forth that honestly to me was not even worth showing because it contained child essay material. Even though thankfully that was redacted. It's just still extremely graphic and horrific. Now, how do we know this is Jeffrey Epstein? Well, another imessage email shows your child has not arrived with the sender self and that's Jeffrey Epstein's email. Obviously the person that he's sending that to is not is redacted. Ask yourselves why? Why are they redacting this name? Okay, let's move on to the next file. These emails that I'm about to show you with this one being the first show Don Jr. Donald Trump Jr. Jeff, Donald Trump's son being discussed in the Epstein files between Jeffrey Epstein and Steve Bannon. Here they're talking about sending a clip to Don Jr. And another email, they talk about meeting Don Jr. In New York. Quote, I'm back in New York the 14th and the 15th. I won't be here. Let me send you some dates. Can we do coffee with Don Jr. Thursday, Friday only if easy. As you know, I like people that are funny. I want to make something clear. There is nothing criminal implicating Don Jr. Here, but the dates are significant. And to me, this is a bombshell for a few reasons. First, at the time this email was sent, in the previous email that I showed you, Donald Trump was President of the United States. The Department of Justice had already opened up a criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking allegations at the time. Right. This is also years after Donald Trump claimed to have severed all communications and ties with Jeffrey Epstein after he was horrified by what Epstein did at Mar a Lago. And despite that, now you have emails suggesting that Jeffrey Epstein may have had coffee with Donald Trump Jr. Years after his father said that he sever ties. Now also there is new video footage that was revealed in this in the Epstein files today showing, quote, I want the highlighted portion from 10:39pm A flash of orange looks to be going up the LTR stairs. Could possibly be an inmate escorted up to that tier. What are you looking at? This is an FBI analysis of the video footage of essentially what happened the night Jeffrey Epstein died in his cell. Previously, publicly, the doj, the FBI were saying that essentially no one came up to a cell. No one came up to a cell that night. But this contradicts that. A flash of orange looks to be going up to the cell. Who looked to be going up to the cell. That's a question that has yet to be answered. Yet to be answered. Now, we have additional documents, this time talking about Elon Musk that I do want to show you. And These are from 2012, where there's a back and forth between Jeffrey Epstein and a redacted person talking about Elon Musk and suggesting, quote, potentially getting someone to give Elon Musk a massage. That's what this email is suggesting here. It's unclear whether or not Elon Musk ever got that massage, but obviously this is a significant document, shows closer ties. Once again, this was years after Jeffrey Epstein had already been convicted of sex trafficking. Sorry, not sex trafficking of prostitution in 2008. And so there are more and more of these files that we're learning. And well, now Congressman Ro Khanna says he has demanded a meeting with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to see why senders of emails have been redacted, concealing the reputations of these powerful men as a blatant violation of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. They tend to agree, but at a point, what is a meeting going to do? What is a letter going to do? There needs to be. More and more people are clamoring for contempt for possible impeachment and more as we learn, more violations in the Epstein files. And it comes as the White House is telling the public over the past several days that they want you to stop. They want you to stop talking about these files. They want you to stop reading them. They want you to move on. Well, next week, Attorney General Pam Bondi will be testifying on Capitol Hill. She will be testifying in front of the House Judiciary Committee where I expect significant questions to be asked of her about the way the Department of Justice went about reviewing and redacting these files. Because clearly, even to this day, as I've gone through tens of thousands, potentially more than 100,000 documents, I've lost track at this point that there are still significant redaction errors in which the survivors are not redacted because there are still names of survivors in these files. And yet perpetrators, possible conspirators, are redacted. And that is a major, major problem. Now, on another note, this afternoon, I had the privilege of speaking, speaking with Susan Del Bene, who is the chairwoman of the dccc. She's also a congresswoman. And we spoke about what the map looks like for congressional Democrats if they wanted to take back the House. Spoke about that map and what that looks like and some seats that she thinks that they can pick up. So I want you to watch this interview with her. It's a longer video, but I think it's an important interview as well. So make sure to like, comment, share and subscribe. Support my work by subscribing to my substack. Click the link below. And here's my interview with Susan Del Bene. Super excited today to be joined by Congresswoman Susan Del Bene, who is also the chairwoman of the dccc. Now, Congresswoman, I gotta ask you, you are in charge of electing Democrats to House seats across the country. What does the map look like today?
- [08:30]
B
So we have a big map. First, we've got to make sure that we keep the folks we have. We have 24 folks we call our frontliners. These are the folks who are in tough reelections. We got to make sure we reelect them. And then we have 39 seats where we're on offense across the country. To put it in perspective, we have Republicans have a three seat majority, three seats. So we need to net three seats to take back the gavels. And we have an offensive map of 39 districts across the country. In fact, we just added to that map at the end of the year because we see more opportunities. These are districts from Michigan and Pennsylvania to Iowa and Arizona and Kentucky and Tennessee. We have opportunities all across the country. And we have great candidates who want to run, people who are stepping up because they see what's happening across the country and they want to do their part to make a difference. And we know when we have great candidates running talking about the issues that matter, that we win. And maybe the last thing I'll remind folks of is even in 2024, we actually picked up seats in the House. Democrats picked up seats. We had 14 Democrats who won in districts that Donald Trump also won in. So we know we have great candidates talking about the issues that matter. We can win in these purple districts across the country and absolutely American people on our side. And we have a great opportunity to take back the gavels, take back the majority and put a check on this administration and this president.
- [10:09]
A
So I want to ask you more about those numbers. So three seats for Democrats to flip the House, what does that look like in terms of special elections this year? Could that modify that number or is it just three seats? Is that what we're looking at?
- [10:21]
B
Well, right now there's one, you know, we have one vacancy in New Jersey that we know. You know, primaries have been going on there too to fill that seat that's a blue district. And so we're looking forward to having another Democratic member join us. That puts us back up to 215. And then it's about what happens in November. There may be other special elections that come along the way, but really some of the special elections have been in districts that aren't quite as purple. But we're going to fight everywhere we can in every district we can. And you know, we also know sometimes folks decide to retire that we don't expect. And so there may be other opportunities along the way. But we know that we have many, many opportunities in November.
- [11:14]
A
I got to ask you because I think you mentioned like 39 toss up and away seats. You're targeting a lot of these seats across the country who are some candidates or some races that you're watching that maybe the average American doesn't really know about and probably should know about.
- [11:28]
B
So 39. And there are districts all over. We have districts in, for example, in Pennsylvania, Janelle Stelson running against Scott Perry, a great candidate she actually ran last cycle, overperformed, came really close. She's going to win this time. That's one example. Or Paige Cognetti, mayor of Scranton, who's also running to flip a seat in Pennsylvania, Jonathan Nez, the former president of the Navajo Nation, running in Arizona, incredibly strong candidate running against a very extreme Republican, which is saying a lot these days. Eli Crane, Joe Mendoza also running in Arizona, in Southern Arizona against Juan Siskamani. Another place where we have a great opportunity to pick up, we have mayor in Tennessee, Chasmulder running against Andy Ogles. So I remind folks that sometimes it's in places of the country that people aren't always thinking about that we might have opportunities, but these are opportunities that we have that are all across the country. And great candidates, folks who have connections to their community, who are speaking to everyone in their community. By definition these are districts, they're purple districts. They're districts where people have many different political points of view. But when you have someone who authentically is talking about what they can do to make a difference for their community, that kind of cuts across a lot of boundaries and creates opportunities. And so great candidates and maybe there's also just a huge yearning across the country that we've seen for folks to have. People are going to stand up for their communities in Congress who aren't just going to be a rubber stamp for Donald Trump. And so another place where we have opportunity. And remember, in special elections that we have seen since November of 2024, we have seen Democratic over performers by about 13%. And in congressional special elections, Democrats are running 17 points ahead. So just across the country, people are seeing what's happening and are expressing their desires, their needs with their vote. And that's absolutely going to happen in November as well.
- [13:49]
A
Well, I got to ask you. So special elections to me are a bit of a fickle thing in terms of turnout, in terms of final results. And I think we've also, like you said, we've, we've seen the headlines, Democrats over performing everywhere. Lots of Americans really upset with what's happening in Washington today in the administration. Are you at all concerned about voter apathy that essentially so many Democrats will just say, you know, we have this in the bag, that they're not going to turn out in November.
- [14:13]
B
We absolutely should realize that we have to do everything we can if we're going to win. I am confident and I am paranoid. I think that the election is not being held today. The election is nine months away. And we need everyone to realize that we have to do everything we can collectively. We've got to be out there helping support great candidates. People have to be making sure that they are talking to their friends and neighbors about how critical their vote is. There is so much at stake. And the number one thing we can do to put a check on this administration is to make sure we take back the majority in the House of Representatives. We have the best map. We have opportunities all across the country. We only need three seats. So that is the number one thing we can do. There are other things we all want to do as well on top of that. But the number one thing we can do is take back the gavels. When we have Speaker Hakeem Jeffries, when we have the chairs of committees, that means we can have hearings and oversight. We control what bills go on the floor and can make sure that we're getting votes on critical bills. For all of those reasons, it is critically important that we take back the majority. We can, but we are going to take nothing for granted. None of us should. We should all work incredibly hard to get there because there is so much at stake.
- [15:37]
A
Now, before I let you go, I do want to ask you, because we talk about elections, we talk about November and we've seen over the past several days, especially the president seeking to undermine the election, Right. You have Steve Bannon suggesting They'll deploy ICE agents to the polls. You have Donald Trump saying he wants to federalize and nationalize these elections. You're in charge of the Democratic plan for these elections. Are you at all worried that the president in this White House will take action to undermine what happens in November?
- [16:03]
B
So let's be clear. They started on this path a long time ago. You have seen them attack mail in voting, trying to make it harder and harder for folks to have access to the ballot. And we have been challenging in court and we have been winning in court and are going to continue to challenge legally. Clearly, they know they can't win because with the hearts and minds of the American people, that's why they are trying to redistrict across the country. President Trump called up Republicans in Texas and literally said, give me five seats. The people of Texas hate this. The people, people across the country hate it. And we are fighting and redistricting battles across the country. And you saw what happened in California. The people of California who actually got to say stood up. So we're going to fight there. And absolutely, we're going to continue to fight to make sure that our local, the folks across the country who are managing elections, these local election administrators all across the country stand up to make sure that they can do their jobs. And I think it's important for folks to remember that we all have a role to play there. Public sentiment has a huge impact on what happens across the country. Even Republicans have been starting to speak out about some of the comments the president has made about trying to control elections. So the American, the voice of the American people is critically important, makes a difference. That's how we see great changes. So I remind everyone, be engaged, be involved, stand up and absolutely make sure you vote.
- [17:40]
A
Congresswoman, thanks so much for joining me.
- [17:42]
B
Thank you.
- [17:43]
A
Hey folks, thanks so much for watching. Feel free to add this podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or anywhere you watch for the latest breaking news and daily hits throughout the day. Make sure to follow, subscribe. See you soon for more.
- [17:56]
C
This is the new Weight Watchers. It works for members like JoJo, who's learning simple, healthy habits. Sharia, who's making progress with meds, and Kim, who still gets to eat what she loves. For over 60 years, we've helped millions of members find what works for them. Now it's your turn. Watch your life open up. Watch your story shift. Watch what you're capable of. Watch it work. Get started today@weightwatchers.com.