Transcript
A (0:00)
We have significant developments this evening. More bombshell Epstein files have been revealed. I've spent the afternoon digging probably close to over 100,000 Epstein files that I've gone through already. And well, there are some serious ones that we need to talk about. Referring to Elon Musk, referring to Donald Trump Jr. Files suggesting that the Department of Justice's story on whether or not Epstein committed suicide and killed himself or are accurate. Questions are now being raised and major redaction errors that really expose the fact that this DOJ is failing at its job. And at the same time, the White House is urgently asking Americans to move away from this. Donald Trump wants folks not to talk about Epstein. The White House is saying move on. The Department of Justice is saying case closed. And, and well, pressure is building on Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanch and Attorney General Pam Bondi ahead of next week's critical hearing in which Pam Bondi will testify on Capitol Hill in front of the House Judiciary Committee. Let's just jump right in. But before I do, as always, like comment, share and subscribe, people need to see this. So make sure to like this video. The more you like, the more people will see. And subscribe to my substack by clicking the link below. Helps me stay caffeinated and stay sane. Honestly, at this point. Let's just jump right in because I want to talk about these files that we found this afternoon and I want to start with probably one of the biggest bombshells in the entire files. This one. Quote, do you remember the name of the gynecologist that you used to send your victims to? That is from an email that the New York Times has previously reported is associated with Mark Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein's brother. Jeffrey Epstein writes in response, quote, New York question mark, ask yourselves this. Why is that name redacted in the two when the email below is not redacted? Presumably the email above has Mark Epstein and then the the email and so they redacted that name when in reality you can just trace this email to kind of figure out whose it is. That's what the Times did. But this is a clear back and forth from 2012 where they are discussing, quote, victims, Epstein's victims back in 2012. And Mark Epstein has not been subpoenaed by any House Oversight committee or any Judiciary committee. No one's demanding more answers from him. He doesn't have some type of privilege here. Why not? Why is that redacted? Let's continue. New emails also show very disturbing back and forth. This is they're both redacted seemingly one is Jeffrey Epstein. And I'll show you why in a second. But they talk about, quote, your child has not arrived. She's in the house. They're actively talking in these, in this email chain about children, about moving young children from one place to another. This is horrific. And this is just the first page of what was a lengthy, lengthy back and forth that honestly to me was not even worth showing because it contained child essay material. Even though thankfully that was redacted. It's just still extremely graphic and horrific. Now, how do we know this is Jeffrey Epstein? Well, another imessage email shows your child has not arrived with the sender self and that's Jeffrey Epstein's email. Obviously the person that he's sending that to is not is redacted. Ask yourselves why? Why are they redacting this name? Okay, let's move on to the next file. These emails that I'm about to show you with this one being the first show Don Jr. Donald Trump Jr. Jeff, Donald Trump's son being discussed in the Epstein files between Jeffrey Epstein and Steve Bannon. Here they're talking about sending a clip to Don Jr. And another email, they talk about meeting Don Jr. In New York. Quote, I'm back in New York the 14th and the 15th. I won't be here. Let me send you some dates. Can we do coffee with Don Jr. Thursday, Friday only if easy. As you know, I like people that are funny. I want to make something clear. There is nothing criminal implicating Don Jr. Here, but the dates are significant. And to me, this is a bombshell for a few reasons. First, at the time this email was sent, in the previous email that I showed you, Donald Trump was President of the United States. The Department of Justice had already opened up a criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking allegations at the time. Right. This is also years after Donald Trump claimed to have severed all communications and ties with Jeffrey Epstein after he was horrified by what Epstein did at Mar a Lago. And despite that, now you have emails suggesting that Jeffrey Epstein may have had coffee with Donald Trump Jr. Years after his father said that he sever ties. Now also there is new video footage that was revealed in this in the Epstein files today showing, quote, I want the highlighted portion from 10:39pm A flash of orange looks to be going up the LTR stairs. Could possibly be an inmate escorted up to that tier. What are you looking at? This is an FBI analysis of the video footage of essentially what happened the night Jeffrey Epstein died in his cell. Previously, publicly, the doj, the FBI were saying that essentially no one came up to a cell. No one came up to a cell that night. But this contradicts that. A flash of orange looks to be going up to the cell. Who looked to be going up to the cell. That's a question that has yet to be answered. Yet to be answered. Now, we have additional documents, this time talking about Elon Musk that I do want to show you. And These are from 2012, where there's a back and forth between Jeffrey Epstein and a redacted person talking about Elon Musk and suggesting, quote, potentially getting someone to give Elon Musk a massage. That's what this email is suggesting here. It's unclear whether or not Elon Musk ever got that massage, but obviously this is a significant document, shows closer ties. Once again, this was years after Jeffrey Epstein had already been convicted of sex trafficking. Sorry, not sex trafficking of prostitution in 2008. And so there are more and more of these files that we're learning. And well, now Congressman Ro Khanna says he has demanded a meeting with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to see why senders of emails have been redacted, concealing the reputations of these powerful men as a blatant violation of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. They tend to agree, but at a point, what is a meeting going to do? What is a letter going to do? There needs to be. More and more people are clamoring for contempt for possible impeachment and more as we learn, more violations in the Epstein files. And it comes as the White House is telling the public over the past several days that they want you to stop. They want you to stop talking about these files. They want you to stop reading them. They want you to move on. Well, next week, Attorney General Pam Bondi will be testifying on Capitol Hill. She will be testifying in front of the House Judiciary Committee where I expect significant questions to be asked of her about the way the Department of Justice went about reviewing and redacting these files. Because clearly, even to this day, as I've gone through tens of thousands, potentially more than 100,000 documents, I've lost track at this point that there are still significant redaction errors in which the survivors are not redacted because there are still names of survivors in these files. And yet perpetrators, possible conspirators, are redacted. And that is a major, major problem. Now, on another note, this afternoon, I had the privilege of speaking, speaking with Susan Del Bene, who is the chairwoman of the dccc. She's also a congresswoman. And we spoke about what the map looks like for congressional Democrats if they wanted to take back the House. Spoke about that map and what that looks like and some seats that she thinks that they can pick up. So I want you to watch this interview with her. It's a longer video, but I think it's an important interview as well. So make sure to like, comment, share and subscribe. Support my work by subscribing to my substack. Click the link below. And here's my interview with Susan Del Bene. Super excited today to be joined by Congresswoman Susan Del Bene, who is also the chairwoman of the dccc. Now, Congresswoman, I gotta ask you, you are in charge of electing Democrats to House seats across the country. What does the map look like today?
