
Loading summary
A
There's some big news right now. More and more Epstein files have been released. More and more Epstein files show a closer than previously reported relationship between one man, Howard Lutnick, the current Trump Commerce Secretary, and Jeffrey Epstein. It's a relationship that the public didn't know existed. Why? Because back in 2005, Howard Lutnick said he was so disgusted by Jeffrey Epstein that he essentially never wanted to see him again. But the documents show a very different tale. And in fact, they were business partners. That's how serious this relationship got years after that moment of disgust for Lutnick. At the same time, the Trump White House is embroiled in scandal this morning because fallout from the racist Obama picture video posted by the President of the United States, or rather, sorry, a staff member on the president's personal truth social account has drawn widespread condemnation to the point where Republicans running for reelection in the House of Representatives say, we don't know what to do. This may have just cost us the House of Representatives. It's that bad. Let's jump right in. But before I do, as always, like, comment, share and subscribe, the more you like, the more people see this. Support my work, even on a Saturday morning. Subscribe to my substack. Click the link below. I want to start by talking about the close relationship between Howard Lutnick, the Commerce Secretary, and Jeffrey Epstein, because this is a relationship that honestly, to me, is one of the biggest revelations in the Epstein files. And we're learning more. So this document that you're going to see is the last page. Essentially on the left is a signature page signed by Howard Lutnick. On the right is a signature page signed by Jeffrey Epstein. Now, you may think, well, this is innocuous. This doesn't mean anything, Right? Well, what you're seeing here is that each of them signed on behalf of limited liability companies. The date December 28, 2012. The point? To acquire a stake in a now shuttered advertising technology company called Adfin. Now, the thing is, there's nothing wrong with acquiring a stake in an advertising company. Sure. What the issue here is that 2012 is far, far longer than Howard Lutnick ever previously said his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was. And it's not just this document, because here is an email between Jeffrey Epstein, a Rosaleen Fontanilla and a Leslie Groff concerning Jeffrey Epstein's schedule. I want you to look at the date. April 27, 2011. Look at what happened at 5pm that day. Appointment with Howard Lutnick. Drinks. He was getting drinks with Howard Lutnick in 2011. And it's not just that, because there is more. This email from December 24, 2012, just days before they signed that admin agreement that I showed you at the beginning says, quote, good morning, Howard. Jeffrey wished me to pass along that below to you. Nice seeing you. Please read number 2.3. We don't know what that is referring to, but it confirms that the two of them saw one another in December 2012, days before signing that advent agreement that we previously reported. And I previously found documents showing Howard Lutnick wanting to go to Epstein's Island. Wanted to with his family, even with his children, with his wife. And while the Commerce Secretary says he did nothing wrong, he may not have done anything criminal. But why lie to the American public is my question. Because I want you to listen to what Howard Lutnick had to say on a New York Post podcast in which he says that after 2005, he essentially said he's never going to be in the same room as Jeffrey Epstein again. Take a listen.
B
Massage table in the middle of your house. How often you have a massage? And he says, every day. And then he, like, gets like, weirdly close to me. Oh. And he says, and the right kind of massage. Now my wife is standing here. So she looks at me and I look at her and we say, I'm sorry, we have to go. And we left. And in the six or eight steps it takes to get from his house to my house, my wife and I decided that I will never be in the room with that disgusting person ever again. So I was never in the room with him socially, for business or even philanthropy. If that guy was there, I wasn't going because he's gross. And so I look back at it as a gift.
A
Yes.
B
He gave me a gift.
A
Yes.
B
Of a voice. So, yeah, that's my story. A one and absolutely done.
A
That's not true. That's not true. He's having drinks with him. Six years later, they were signing agreements for the same company. Seven years later, they are meeting each other. Seven years later. Why lie, Howard? And this isn't the only issue for the White House this morning because Donald Trump is refusing to apologize for the racist Obama video that he posted or sorry, once again, that White House staffers allegedly posted on his personal truth social account. Take a listen.
C
Post that you took down earlier today. The White House says that a staffer sent it. Who sent it, and are you going to fire it?
D
No, I looked at it. I saw it and I just looked at the first part. It was about voter fraud in someplace, Georgia. There was a lot of voter fraud, 2020 voter fraud. And I didn't see the whole thing. I guess during the end of it there was some kind of that people don't like. I wouldn't like it either, but I didn't see it. I just, I looked at the first part and it was really about voter fraud. It and the machines, how crooked it is, how disgusting it is. Then I gave it to the people to generally they look at the whole thing, but I guess somebody didn't and they posted and we took it down and we did it. Yeah, but that was a voter fraud that nobody talks about. They don't like to talk about that post. We took it down as soon as we found out about it.
C
Mr. President, a number of Republicans are calling on you, you to apologize for that post. Is that something you're going to do?
D
No, I didn't make a mistake. I mean, you give, I look at a lot of thousands of things.
A
I didn't make a mistake. I'm not going to apologize. Well, that's causing some problems because Mick Mulvaney, Donald Trump's former chief of staff, is saying, well, that one truth social post cost Republicans the House of Representatives in the midterm elections. I mean, it's that bad. Quote, I talked to several House members. They are just besides themselves and they don't know how to how they're going to handle it on the road. He said that the post could have been down by a staffer, but it was done at nearly midnight. And there's only two other people that Mulvaney knows that have access to the account. Mulvaney said that if he were the chief of staff, still he would go to the President of the United States, said that it was such and such staffer. It's this person, he's been fired. He's no longer working for the Trump administration. And Mulvaney said he would offer his resignation as chief of staff. Now, obviously, Susie Wiles, the current chief of staff, remains in her role as chief of staff despite the fact that this post was made on the president's truth social account, his personal truth social account that very few people, let's be real, have access to, if any, not just any random White House staffer. So we got some more Epstein documents, right? We got the White House embroiled in scandal. Okay, let's see what what what Saturday brings because with this news cycle, anything is possible these days. So like comment, share and subscribe. I'll have more updates for you soon. Stay tuned for more.
Main Theme:
In this episode of The Parnas Perspective, host Aaron Parnas unpacks two explosive stories dominating political and legal headlines: the release of new Jeffrey Epstein files implicating Howard Lutnick, the sitting Trump Commerce Secretary, and the fallout over a racist Obama picture video posted (or authorized) by the Trump White House on Truth Social. Parnas combines sourced documents with on-air analysis and audio evidence, questioning both transparency in leadership and the political repercussions for the Republican party.
"In the six or eight steps it takes to get from his house to my house, my wife and I decided that I will never be in the room with that disgusting person ever again... I was never in the room with him socially, for business or even philanthropy. If that guy was there, I wasn't going because he's gross. And so I look back at it as a gift."
"That's not true. He's having drinks with him. Six years later, they were signing agreements for the same company. Seven years later, they are meeting each other... Why lie, Howard?"
"No, I didn't make a mistake. I mean, you give, I look at a lot of thousands of things."
"That one truth social post cost Republicans the House of Representatives in the midterm elections. I mean, it’s that bad."
"I will never be in the room with that disgusting person ever again... I was never in the room with him socially, for business or even philanthropy."
"That's not true. He's having drinks with him. Six years later, they were signing agreements for the same company."
"No, I didn't make a mistake. I mean, you give, I look at a lot of thousands of things."
"That one truth social post cost Republicans the House of Representatives in the midterm elections."
Aaron Parnas maintains a punchy, inquisitive, and incisive tone throughout, characterized by direct questions, source-backed claims, and a skepticism toward official statements. The episode interweaves sharp legal insight with real-time political analysis, keeping listeners engaged and up-to-date on the evolving scandals.