
Loading summary
Amazon Music Announcer
From unsolved mysteries to unexplained phenomena, from comedy gold to relationship fails, Amazon Music's got the most ad free top podcasts included with prime because the only thing that should interrupt your listening is, well, nothing. Download the Amazon Music app today.
Political News Host
We have breaking news this afternoon. A massive, massive loss for the Trump Justice Department. Right now, Attorney General Pam Bondi has been forced and subpoenaed to testify in front of the House Oversight Committee in the Epstein investigation. Republicans broke from the Justice Department, joining Democrats to vote to subpoena Pam Bondi. At the same time, the Trump Justice Department tried to prosecute former President Joe Biden along with other Biden officials, and they failed. They were not able to build a case. All while Secretary Kristi Noem of Homeland Security has faced significant grilling on Capitol Hill to the point where she is demanding to essentially almost leave the committee hearing today. Lots of news to cover. Make sure to like, comment, share and subscribe. The more you like, the more people see this. Subscribe to my substack. Click the link below to support my work. We have war in Iran and we have the Epstein files at home, which I'm never going to forget about. So please support my work. Subscribe today. Let's jump right into it. Look at this. That is a vote on Republican Representative Nancy Mace's motion to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi. The vote was 24 to 19. An official subpoena will be issued by the House Oversight Committee. This is not something you can just defy. This is not something Pam Bondi can claim executive privilege over. She has to appear in front of the House Oversight Committee. She has to testify regarding the Epstein files, specifically regarding her department's handling of the Epstein investigation. And here are the Republicans who joined all of the Democrats. Boebert, Lauren Boebert from Colorado, Tim Burchett, Representative Cloud, Representative Nancy Mace, and Scott Perry. That's five Republicans joining all Democrats. As you can see, they voted to issue the subpoena to Pam Bondi. She will have to come on Capitol Hill and testify in front of the House Oversight Committee specifically as it relates to the Epstein files and the Epstein investigation. This is not. Remember that crazy hearing with Pam Bondi in front of the Judiciary Committee that we had, what was it now, two weeks ago? This is a very different hearing because this is specifically related to the Epstein files. This is not related to just general oversight of the Department of Justice. This is related to the Department of Justice's handling of the Epstein files and the failure of the Department of Justice to follow the Epstein Files Transparency Act. And it comes at a very precarious time for this Justice Department because this afternoon we're learning that the DOJ tried to prosecute Joe Biden and other Biden era officials over the autoped, and yet they failed. The New York Times is reporting that the Justice Department, after calls by President Trump to investigate former President Joe Biden, scrutinized whether Biden and his aides broke the law and using the auto pen to sign presidential documents, but was ultimately unable to move forward with making a case. The department's failure to build a criminal case against Joe Biden and his aides is the latest example of, of its increasing inability to follow through on Trump's demands and bring indictments against those he wants criminally targeted. Some of those cases were rejected by grand juries, some were rejected by judges, and some, like the auto pen case, has been abandoned by prosecutors. But the fact, and this is a key point, the fact that prosecutors even pursued the matter to begin with reflects the degree to which Donald Trump is trying to use the powers of the federal government to go after Joe Biden, to go after those in the Biden presidency. That is pretty significant. And, well, it was led by none other. Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. attorney's office in Washington, D.C. we knew that the inquiry was quietly shelved in recent months around the time that prosecutors under Pirro sought to get an indictment against Democratic lawmakers for that seditious video. Remember, I call it the Seditious Six video. That's what they called was the video. Those are not my words, by the way. I don't think there was sedition. It was the video where Alyssa Slotkin, Mark Kelly and a few other Democratic members of Congress essentially told those serving in combat to follow your oath. They called it sedition. They tried to go after them. They failed. They tried to go after Joe Biden for the auto pen. They failed. It comes as preliminary Pentagon cost estimate that the war in Iran cost American taxpayers cost you $1 billion a day, according to Nancy Yousef, a reporter at the Atlantic. A billion taxpayer dollars every single day. On Capitol Hill today, Kristi Noem faced significant grilling from lawmakers. One of the key moments, though, was when they asked her about her relationship with Corey Lewandowski. Take a listen to this back and forth with Kristi Noem.
Congressional Representative
Secretary Noem, at any time during your tenure as director of Department of Homeland Security, have you had sexual relations with Corey Lewandowski?
Kristi Noem
Mr. Chairman, I am shocked that we're going down and peddling tabloid garbage in this committee today. Reclaiming ma', am, one thing that I would tell you is that he is a special government employee who works for the White House. There are thousands of them in the federal government. So reclaiming as an advisory it is okay for you to be no authority. It is okay for you to know, but it is also a real question. So what I would say you should
Congressional Representative
be able to answer.
Kristi Noem
What we do at the Department of Homeland clearly every single and without any hesitation every single day is to protect.
Congressional Representative
If someone is asked to make decisions, you or any federal official is sleeping with their subordinate. That should be easiest. You should be wanting to aim answer that question because it is not about your that you have brought it is about your.
Kristi Noem
That kind of garbage is about reclaiming
Congressional Representative
my time so that I can hear
Political News Host
my recognize time belongs to the gentle lady from California.
Mint Mobile Advertiser
But it'd be nice if you would let her respond.
Congressional Representative
I will. I want to let you know it is about your judgment and decision making. It is about the 260,000 employees that work under you that want to make sure that you are giving information and making decisions. Clearly. It is about conflict of interest. It is about a national security risk. Department of Homeland Security was created right after 911 to protect the homeland. And DHS has circulated an internal bulletin to law enforcement partners warning that the conflict of the war we're in could inspire lone actors or small scale.
Political News Host
At the same time, on Capitol Hill, they're debating War Powers Resolution. Here's what Hakeem Jeffries, Democratic leader, said before voting on the War Powers Resolution.
Hakeem Jeffries
One of the Constitution explicitly provides Congress with the sole authority to declare war. There is nothing ambiguous about that. The framers made that decision because they were concerned about about kings who throughout time plunged their people into unnecessary wars, impoverishing them or imperiling their lives by sending them off to a foreign conflict, often to pillage the resources of others for the benefit of a tyrant and his family. Sound familiar?
Political News Host
Pretty powerful stuff from the Democratic leader in the House. We'll see what happens on that front. I'll have more updates for you very soon. Make sure to like, comment, share and subscribe. Please subscribe to my substack. Click the link below. Can't do this alone without you. We're expanding. We're building. We're going to beat Fox News. Let's do it together. Spread the word. Subscribe to Support hey folks, thanks so much for watching. Feel free to add this podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or anywhere you watch for the latest breaking news, news and daily hits throughout the day. Make sure to follow. Subscribe. See you soon for more.
Mint Mobile Advertiser
Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile with a message for everyone paying Big Wireless Way too much. Please, for the love of everything good in this world, stop with Mint. You can get premium wireless for just $15 a month, of course, if you enjoy overpaying. No judgments. But that's weird. Okay, one judgment anyway, give it a try@mintmobile.com Switch upfront payment of $45 for
Mint Mobile Legal Disclaimer Reader
three month plan equivalent to $15 per month required intro rate first three months only, then full price plan options available, taxes and fees extra. See full terms at mintmobile. Com.
Host: Aaron Parnas
Episode: Breaking: Republicans Break from Trump and Subpoena Bondi over Epstein Files
Date: March 4, 2026
In this fast-paced episode, Aaron Parnas analyzes a series of unprecedented developments on Capitol Hill. The main theme centers on a dramatic bipartisan move: House Republicans breaking from the Trump-aligned Justice Department to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi over the Epstein Files. Parnas unpacks the implications for the ongoing Epstein investigation, the faltering Trump DOJ efforts to prosecute Biden-era officials, intense scrutiny of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and the staggering costs of the war in Iran. Candid, insightful, and urgent, the episode provides a comprehensive view of a chaotic political moment where law, power, and accountability collide.
Timestamp: 00:23 – 03:50
"This is not something Pam Bondi can claim executive privilege over. She has to appear in front of the House Oversight Committee."
— Political News Host (Aaron Parnas), 01:01
Timestamp: 03:51 – 05:25
"The fact that prosecutors even pursued the matter to begin with reflects the degree to which Donald Trump is trying to use the powers of the federal government to go after Joe Biden."
— Political News Host (Aaron Parnas), 04:43
Timestamp: 05:25 – 06:00
Timestamp: 06:00 – 07:13
Memorable Exchange:
Congressional Rep.: "Have you had sexual relations with Corey Lewandowski?"
— 05:27Kristi Noem: "I am shocked that we're going down and peddling tabloid garbage in this committee today."
— 05:39
Timestamp: 07:13 – 08:09
"The Constitution explicitly provides Congress with the sole authority to declare war... The framers made that decision because they were concerned about kings... plunging their people into unnecessary wars... Sound familiar?"
— Hakeem Jeffries, 07:22
"She will have to come on Capitol Hill and testify in front of the House Oversight Committee specifically as it relates to the Epstein files and the Epstein investigation."
— Political News Host (Aaron Parnas), 01:23
"It comes at a very precarious time for this Justice Department because this afternoon we're learning that the DOJ tried to prosecute Joe Biden and other Biden era officials over the autopen, and yet they failed."
— Political News Host (Aaron Parnas), 03:54
"Preliminary Pentagon cost estimate that the war in Iran cost American taxpayers … $1 billion a day."
— Political News Host (Aaron Parnas), 05:08
"There is nothing ambiguous about that. The framers made that decision because they were concerned about kings... Sound familiar?"
— Hakeem Jeffries, 07:22
Aaron Parnas’s coverage sharply illustrates the fractures within the GOP, relentless political maneuvering, and mounting national crises. The episode’s central drama—the bipartisan subpoenaing of Trump’s own AG for a high-profile cover-up—signals new fault lines in Washington. With powerful testimony, unsparing analysis, and front-row access to the halls of power, Parnas connects the dots for listeners navigating a maze of political intrigue, governmental checks and balances, and the ongoing war’s burdens. Engaging, opinionated, and unafraid to probe difficult truths, the episode is a window into an inflection point in American governance.