A (0:00)

Whether you're solving murders during breakfast, cracking cold cases on your commute, or playing amateur detective at bedtime, Amazon Music's got millions of podcast episodes waiting. Just download the Amazon Music app and start listening to your favorite true crime podcasts ad free included with Prime.

B (0:18)

We have major developments this evening from Epstein to Nome to Iran in the Epstein files. We have confirmation now that the FBI found the woman who accused Donald Trump of abusing her when she was a child to be credible. Quote, they wouldn't have interviewed her on four separate occasions if she wasn't credible. We're not going to let this story die and we're going to talk about it today because Pam Bondi, the attorney General of the United States, is in trouble with congressional Republicans right now and could soon face the same fate that Kristi Noem faced. Speaking of Noem, Democrats say that her leaving is not enough. Some are pursuing impeachment. Others are pursuing perjury investigations. They're not willing to let Kristi Noem just go off into the sunset as this new envoy for the United States shield or whatnot. Meanwhile, regarding Iran, China is preparing to possibly join the conflict to assist Iran. Russia has already assisted Iran. The Dow Jones in the United States had its worst week since last April nearly one year ago, and oil prices and gas prices are set to continue to surge, but not just at the pump. Also in the air. If you are traveling, expect to pay a hell of a lot more later this year. Make sure to like, comment, share and subscribe. The more you like, the more people see. Even if you don't like the news, this is important for folks to see. Subscribe to my substack Click the link below to support my work as we build to beat Fox News and rebuild independent media and media as we know it, and we do it together. Let's begin. The Miami Herald has confirmed from a Department of justice source that the agents who interviewed the woman who accused Donald Trump of abusing her when she was a child between the ages of 13 and 15, they found her to be credible. They would not have interviewed her four times if they thought she was lying. The reason the investigation ended, according to the Herald, is because she declined to cooperate with their investigation and they ended up losing touch with her. Now, this is an important note. If you read the four interviews and three of which I showed you last night when they were released, I found them in the Epstein files. In that final interview, she essentially told FBI agents, why would I give you information if you're not going to do anything with It. Which makes sense because. And I've spoken to a number of survivors, and it's not just accusations against Trump. It's accusations against a whole host of wealthy and powerful men. Why would they give up information and potentially put themselves, their lives, their reputation at risk? Because Trump won't just say, okay, here's money, here's whatever, I'm going to go to jail. That's not what would happen. He would fight back. Right. And many of these women do not have the same power, do not have the same amount of money as these wealthy and powerful men. And so she said, why would I give you this information if all you're gonna do is just do nothing with it? And so she declined to cooperate, and they ended up losing touch with her. We don't know where she is today. Now, the White House called the woman's allegations baseless, but the FBI found her credible. And maybe that's why the FBI and the DOJ didn't release these three interviews with her until after Pam Bondi was subpoenaed. And while tonight, according to Politico, Pam Bondi is in trouble with Congressional Republicans and she could be facing an existential threat to her political future after Donald Trump ousted Kristi Noem. Bondi is under intense scrutiny right now for her handling of the Epstein files. And this is a significant development. As many as 20 Republicans might be prepared to back an effort to render punishment against the nation's top prosecutor for slow walking the materials release. What punishment, you may ask? Contempt. Right now, the Department of Justice, there are not enough votes in the United States Senate to remove her from office if the House of Representatives would have impeached her. The House of Representatives does not need the United States Senate's approval to proceed with contempt proceedings. Contempt proceedings could fine Attorney General Bondi, could force her to come in. There are a whole host of powers. The House has inherent contempt powers. And while, according to Congressman Ro Khanna, who told politico, up to 20 Republicans could potentially break to hold her in contempt of Congress. And I would argue that if they held her in contempt of Congress, Donald Trump would likely remove her from the role of Attorney general. She's not the only one facing scrutiny, though. Kristi Ngo may be out as a Department of Homeland Security secretary, But, but, but, but Democrats are still demanding a, quote, reckoning. Democrats met news of Noem's aster with a cascade of calls for accountability. They're ranging from a potential probe into the legality of the contract she cut during her tenure to a perjury investigation after a congressional testimony to a push for impeachment to keep her from holding public office in the future. At least two congressional candidates called for her future criminal prosecution, quote, unquote. We need a reckoning with the fact that there were murders that took place under her watch. There was mass violence and violation of people's civil rights and civil liberties. There's been intense corruption, and there's been rampant lying in the courts and disobeying of court orders, said Jamie Raskin, who will be the chairman of the powerful House Judiciary Committee if Democrats win in the fall. And one of those Democrats, Senator Richard Blumenthal, wrote this letter to Kristi Noem, quote, secretary Noem, yesterday, during an oversight hearing conducted by the Senate Judiciary Committee, you denied under oath that DHS special government employee Corey Lewandowski had a role in approving DHS contracts. Specifically, when asked whether Mr. Lewandowski had a role, you stated unequivocally, no evidence suggests that your testimony was false. Internal records show that Lewandowski has personally approved contracts at dhs, including but not limited to a multimillion dollar contract. And current and former DHS officials have stated that Lewandowski's signature is a green light for money to be transmitted to contractors. The law requires, and Congress expects witnesses to provide complete and truthful testimony. There are criminal penalties for knowingly and willfully making materially false statements or representations to Congress. Accordingly, I demand that you amend your testimony to clarify your previous answer, including a full explanation of Mr. Lewandowski's role at DHS and provide the basis for your apparent false statement on record, essentially setting up a possible perjury investigation of Kristi Noem. And it comes as the stock market. Dow Jones had its worst week. It's no longer above 50,000. It's had its worst week since April. Oil prices are surging, and the war in Iran is about to get a whole lot messier. This morning, we learned that the Russian military, the Russian government has been providing intelligence to the Iranians about where to strike, where U.S. personnel are, where U.S. ships are, et cetera, et cetera. We're also learning this evening from CNN that the Chinese military may be next providing the Iranians with money, missile components and more. Not Chinese boots on the ground, but Chinese support. That would be a major escalation. But maybe that's why. The reason why it's coming is because tonight, Iran is about to face its largest missile barrage it has ever faced.