Loading summary
A
My name is Shannon Maldonado. I'm the founder of Yaoi, a gift shop. From the lens of artists and handmade objects, I chose Shopify because when I was testing other platforms, it was definitely one of the most user friendly. It was important to me to think about where we would be in the future. All of the tools for reading your sales, like planning inventory, they're just right there on your dashboard. For anyone starting a small business, the biggest thing I can tell you is it doesn't have to be perfect. Shopify can help you build upon it. So start your free trial on shopify.com insanity.
B
Huge, huge, huge breaking news. I have never thought I would see the day the Trump administration's Department of justice just admitted that Donald Trump lied. Just admitted they admitted it. We know that Donald Trump lies. It happens all the time. Happens every day, twice a day, three times a day, four times a day. But literally seconds ago in a court filing, the Trump Department of Justice says Trump lied. No one vandalized the reflecting pool. Remember how Trump has been talking about this massive gash in the reflecting pool? It's all bullshit. It's all bullshit. And the Department of Justice just said so in court. Because seconds ago the Trump Justice Department issued a filing in a case involving an Olympian by the name of David Hearn. If you don't know who David Hearn is, he is an Olympian. He competed on behalf of the United States of America and he was indicted by the Trump Justice Department for destruction of federal government property. Facing up to 10 years in prison for allegedly vandalizing the reflecting pool. We all knew that was bullshit. We knew that never happened. Well, tonight they're dropping the charges. And this court filing, what I'm about to show you, everyone needs to see. Because Jeanine Pirro, and in this filing completely throws her boss under the bus, Completely throws her boss under the bus. Says that there was no vandalism, that it was a shoddy job done by a pool contractor given a no bid contract. Insanity. I never thought I'd see today. Make sure to hit that subscribe button. Get us to a million subscribers. Like comment Share. The more you do, the more people see. I want to talk about this filing with you. I just got it in my email inbox and I want to break it down. It begins by saying, by saying, and this is, this is pretty crazy to me. Okay, you ready? Department of Interior provided less than fulsome information at the outset of this case. However, the information subsequently demanded by U.S. attorneys offices disclosed by the Department of Interior which was not known to the prosecutors or the grand jury before the return of the indictment strongly suggests that a rushed and botched installation by aic, the primary contractor, led to the damage to the lining of the reflecting pool. It was not until the U.S. attorney's office repeatedly reached out to the Department of Interior dozens and dozens of times, that Department of Interior slowly started trickling information to the U.S. attorney's office. Had the Department of Interior been forthcoming with the information clearly in its possession, the government would not have sought a grand jury indictment. Furthermore, prosecutors have an obligation pursuant to Brady and Rule 16 of the Superior Court of the Rules of Criminal Procedure to produce information to defense. The Department of Interior's failure to fully and accurately provide information to the U.S. attorney's office undermined the government's ability to abide by these responsibilities. So what they're saying is Department of Interior Doug Burgum, you're getting not only getting thrown under the bus, the bus is rolling over you multiple times because it was the fault of the Department of Interior. They didn't give over documents and it was a botched installation of the reflecting pool. But wait, it gets better. Based upon the initial reports provided by the Department of Interior, the U.S. attorney's Office for the District of Columbia presented the grand jury with evidence that damage to the reflecting pool was caused by vandals, including David Hearn. However, it was not until after the return of the indictment that the Department of Interior provided additional documents to the U.S. attorney's office indicating that damage to the reflecting pool was the result of a flawed installation by the contractor and Atlantic Industrial Coatings and the rush to complete the project prior to events associated with America 250 celebrations in the weeks surrounding Independence Day 2026. It was not until after these documents were produced that the U.S. attorney's office first became aware of information showing that damage was the result of a botched installation, not vandalism. They are admitting there were no vandals. How many times? How many times did Donald Trump claim that there was vandalism, that someone vandalized this reflecting pool, that there was this giant gash in the reflecting pool? How many times? Probably at least five times, probably more. And yet there was no vandalism. They say there was no vandalism. Stunning. But it continues. On July 17, 2026, as a defense expert inspected a now drained reflecting pool, US Attorney Pirro and senior DC Employees once again visited the site and this time immediately noted extensive damage throughout the now drained pool. It was at the time that the U.S. attorney's office first became aware of significant damage throughout the pool and accordingly requested all documents from Department of Interior concerning how the pool was lined and all records regarding the installation of the lining. Based on this request, they received 695 megabytes of additional documents from the Department of Interior which took days to review. These documents indicated a rushed and flawed installation process with repeated failures of the lining during the installation process and extensive peeling of the lining throughout the reflecting pool. It was the first time the U.S. attorney's office became aware but wait. It gets better. It gets better. The U.S. attorney's Office review of the recently provided documents by the Department of Interior revealed that Atlantic Industrial Coatings was selected as the sole source contractor for installation of the reflecting pole lining. Installation began on May 5 but was delayed to May 6 due to rainfall. On May 7, installation continued with cleaning and organizing the construction site and the spraying of Rhino 406 to coat a bunch of things. Then they had expansion joints, yada yada yada. Okay, but they were being pushed. There was an email in a May 7 email that it was already behind schedule. They were rushing this because they wanted it done by Trump's celebration deadline and it continued. They spray. They spray. They spray. They had further delays, Further delays. Further further delays. Wait till you see this bombshell. They have an email. This is an email written by the national park employee internally. Hello all. This morning an area of the reflecting pool coating was identified to be peeling. NAMA staff was notified and I was able to inspect the area. Below are some notes on my observation and conversation with the contractor. Only the top layer of liner has peeled. This is very thin and will not impact the strength of the liner. The color underneath the peel is still dark America flag blue. The total peel area is small. The contractors say the peel area was overspray. I stated my concern that this is overspray along the perimeter of the pool could lead to a one to two foot strip that is vulnerable to peeling. Contractor would not confirm. So the contractor was like telling them a false bill of goods, right? Was lying to this National Park Service employee this entire time. And as a result, almost immediately after the work was completed, peeling was observed along the pool perimeter. The National Park Service Engineers June 11, 2026 email stated that the cause of the damage was contractor error via overspray that the peeled lining would not float and that the peeling would not impact the strength of the liner. The engineer's report also suggests that removing the liner at the perimeter would have no negative impacts on the economic value of the liner. Moreover, the July 20, 2026 inspection by contractors confirmed that overspray and delimination and had occurred, again pointing to contractor error. Finally, a recent visual inspector showed damage throughout the reflecting pool, even in the middle of the pool, where a vandal would not likely attempt to peel the lining. Given all of this newly discovered information, it is difficult to attribute the widespread damage through the reflecting pool to vandalism, let alone to establish that fact beyond a reasonable doubt. They are admitting that Donald Trump is a liar. That Donald Trump is a liar, but also Judge Jeanine Pirro is. You're a liar, too.
C
Was.
D
Was this part of the pool? Specifically, some of the. Was the sealant already partially removed? Did he rip it back? And you just described in detail. Because he maintains that it looks the same as it did before he arrived. That's his.
E
You know, I'm not going to get into the evidence, but what I told you is what our witnesses saw and experienced. There was an effort, a violent effort to rip up the sealant from the bottom of the pool. And irrespective of whether or not, you know, we think that, you know, there. There is some situation that preceded it, we can state and prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he caused damage. And that damage is over $1,000.
D
Keying in on that. How do you prove that thousand dollars
E
with an expert come to the trial.
D
It has to be drained. Like, is that because it has.
E
You can. We will hear all that at the trial.
D
Did he have any tools or was it just his bare hands?
E
Right now, we believe it's his bare hands. Both hands.
D
So does that indicate in your belief that it was probably damaged before, or do you believe that he.
E
Oh, he damaged it further.
D
But do you believe it had already been damaged before?
E
He damaged the pool.
C
Before he touched it.
E
He damaged this pool.
D
But there have been, you know, all these videos.
E
Well, good. I'm glad you've got that. Evans, come on in the grand jury. You can testify next.
B
He didn't damage the pool. He didn't damage the pool. Complete lie and honestly defamatory in a lot of ways. I think if I'm David Hearn, I could probably sue Jeanine Pirro. But it's not just Jeanine Pirro. It's also Doug Burgum odds of expansion.
F
But it peeled off. Why? Why did that happen, Giorgio?
C
It didn't peel off. There was. There was. There was vandalism. There was box. Box cutters. There have been seven arrests. There was people literally trying to destroy part of a monument. The reflecting pool is not just a pool on the Mall. It is part of the Lincoln Memorial. And if anybody says that they're going to go and vandalize that, it's no different than if someone was throwing.
F
And you're 100% sure that what happened with the liner was vandalism? You can prove it?
C
Oh, you absolutely can. And as we drain it, we've got all the photographs we can see. I mean, there's no possible way with
F
photographs of a person or people cutting a 300 or 350 foot gash in the bottom of the reflecting pool.
C
Dana, I'm not sure why you and others in the media think that you want to keep trying to question whether or not this is an industrial liner. Every farmer and rancher in America that's had their pickup liner lined by this sprayed on liner knows that you literally, literally, it would never just like peel off or fall off. This is like a strong material and it's the size of eight football fields. And the only way you can end up with actual slices in one spot and not the other is that some, someone physically cut it. And so the. But the pool itself, it's not leaking. It was leaking 45,000 gallons a day. It's finally been fixed by President Trump and the American flag blue is working perfectly. And again, it's beyond me why. I mean, the real scandal is about the fact that the state of our capital was in such total disrepair that some people. No one was reporting about. I reporting about the pro Hamas graffiti on the, the.
F
Mr. Secretary, you and I talked about this last month as a result. Well, because It's. It was July 4th and the reflecting pole was closed.
C
It was closed because it's surrounded by fireworks. It's closed every year on the fourth of July.
F
But it was closed prior to that in order to fix the reflecting.
C
But I do close because the fire, the largest fireworks display in the country, talk about, was set up and it lines either side of the reflecting pool. You can't have people around fire fireworks when they're being set up. Now that the fireworks come down, the fence will come down. The fence was there because of the fireworks.
F
Copy that.
B
Madness. He said there were witnesses. He said there's no other way that these gashes could have occurred. He lied. He lied. Doug Burgum lied. And his Department of Interior, according to Trump's Department of Justice, lied, stonewalled, refused to provide evidence because they knew the truth. And the truth is there was no vandalism. Donald Trump lied. Jeanine Pirro lied. Doug Burgum lied. They all lied. Subscribe to support and I'll see you soon. Hey folks, thanks so much for watching. Feel free to add this podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or anywhere you watch for the latest breaking news and daily hits throughout the day. Make sure to follow subscribe. See you soon for more.
Podcast Summary: The Parnas Perspective
Episode Title: DOJ Admits Trump Lied About Reflecting Pool!!
Host: Aaron Parnas
Date: July 31, 2026
In this urgent, fast-paced episode, Aaron Parnas breaks down a dramatic development in a high-profile legal case: The Department of Justice (DOJ) under the Trump administration has publicly admitted in a court filing that Donald Trump’s claims about vandalism to the Lincoln Memorial's Reflecting Pool were false. The episode unpacks how false narratives were propagated by Trump, Judge Jeanine Pirro, and Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum, and how the truth—revealed by an internal investigation—debunks previous indictments and media claims. The discussion also exposes governmental failures, transparency issues, and political motivations behind the original allegations.
Aaron Parnas (Host):
From DOJ Filing (read aloud):
Doug Burgum:
This episode delivers a compelling, real-time takedown of a political misinformation campaign, detailing how legal and bureaucratic failures fed a narrative that was only corrected through persistent legal investigation. It’s a vivid example for listeners of why transparency and scrutiny are crucial in government operations, and how quickly sensational claims can unravel under genuine oversight.
Anyone who missed the episode can walk away understanding:
Listener Action Suggested:
Aaron emphasizes that more people need to see this information—share, subscribe, and help confront misinformation together.