Loading summary
Transcript1 lines
- [00:00]
A
When we talk about presidential corruption, the one thing that stands out to me is the way that news stories in 2026 and 2025 rapidly come in and out of the news cycle about the president, his sons, his companies. And one day we're talking about a major corruption story, the next day we've moved on to another one. And because of this constant flooding, the zone of just corruption, corruption, corruption. Never once are any of them actually adjudicated. Take for example, the story we learned in the past week. One of the largest banks in the country, Capital One, closed down over 300 accounts linked to Donald Trump and the Trump Organization, including Eric Trump, the President's son. These accounts include winery related accounts, water bottle accounts, real estate developers and more. Why were the accounts closed? Because of possible money laundering concerns. If President Biden, President Bush or President Obama had 300, had one account, let alone 300 accounts closed due to money laundering concerns at one of the nation's largest banks, they'd face impeachment proceedings almost immediately. But with Donald Trump, it's just another day, another day in the news cycle. And yet there's another corruption story because now Trump has accepted money into his crypto company from a foreigner who has major, major sketchy concerns that, well, if Joe Biden did this, once again, we'd be calling for his impeachment. We, as in Congress, Congress would be calling for the removal of the American President. But here's what I'm not going to do. I'm not going to let these stories just get swept under the rug. And so we're going to talk about it all. So make sure to hit that subscribe button. We're on the road to a million subscribers. Like Comment Share. Your support allows me to keep these stories in the news, especially the money laundering aspect and all of this. When I was a lawyer, one of the number one things I was told in any investigation is to follow the money. Oftentimes it is hard to nail down an individual in a prosecution for non monetary claims. You need witnesses, sometimes eyewitnesses, video camera footage, you need DNA evidence. I mean, there's so much more that goes into a generic prosecution. But when you're prosecuting someone for money related concerns, money laundering, crypto corruption, whatever it may be, it's actually a lot easier oftentimes to prosecute simply by following the money, because you have everything as paper. You have paper trails of money going in and out of bank accounts. In this case, you have paper trails showing 300 plus bank accounts being shut down by one of the nation's largest banks because of money laundering concerns. And you also have paper trails over this massive crypto donation that the President's crypto company accepted during the World cup soccer final in New Jersey last month. Zach Witkoff, the co founder of Donald Trump's cryptocurrency company, took in the action from a luxury suite. Joining him was a man who had made the president and all of the company's co founders much richer because two years earlier, Guran Bobby Zhao was a failed hardwood flooring retailer in Britain who had come under investigation, therefore money laundering, and presided over the collapse of a small crypto startup. Then, seemingly out of nowhere, he became one of the biggest buyers of tokens from Trump's crypto company called World Liberty Financial, dropping a total of $100 million through a new firm he created called Aqua One. It was quiet for months other than speaking briefly as Mr. Bobby from Aqua One during a little known noticed audio stream on Twitter saying, we are proud to be a major partner in World Liberty, which is the Trump family's crypto venture. Under World Liberty policy, as much as $75 million of that money was distributed to a company controlled by the President and his three sons. The money also benefited the family of Steve Witkoff, the Trump administration's special peace envoy and the father of Zach Witkoff. In any prior era, a windfall for the President of this size from a foreigner with no public signs of access to that wealth would have gone against norms and might have spawned the congressional investigations it would have. Instead, the curious case of Mr. Zhao illustrates the ease of which buyers with unknown backgrounds and motivations can use the anonymity of cryptocurrency to shower Trump with money. So here's how it worked and I'll break it down. If I was a prosecutor, here's what I would do. I would get in front of a jury. Right now, you're my jury. I put up a big board. On the left you have Mr. Zhao. In the center you have World Liberty Financial. And on the right you'd have Donald Trump and his sons, along with the Witkoffs. And you'd have an arrow pointing from Mr. Zhao to World Liberty Financial, an arrow from World Liberty Financial to the Trump family. World Liberty Financial has turned into a conduit, a conduit by which foreigners now can just give money to the President of the United States of America. Now, can a foreigner just give money to the President? Theoretically, there could be a gift. I mean, there's nothing necessarily prohibiting it. This large sum of money, though, you would need to pay taxes on it. Right. If the president and his organization received $75 million two years ago, they'd need to pay taxes on it. But actually they wouldn't because the organization and the president and his sons are under an IRS immunity agreement. So they don't actually have to pay taxes if they didn't. That's one thing. The second thing is what this is very concerning to a lot of folks and a lot of experts in the field is something called a foreign straw donation. A straw donation occurs when you use a conduit, kind of like World Liberty Financial, to mask the donation of, of the original donor. So in this case, you have a foreigner, and by the way, it is illegal in the United States of America to have a foreigner donate to an American campaign. It is illegal. If you live in the United kingdom, you're a UK citizen, you cannot donate $1,000 a dollar to the President's campaign. But what's happening here is they're skirting traditional campaign finance laws by using crypto as the conduit and using the crypto company that Trump created as the conduit. So as the straw donor. So what you have is you have a foreigner with little access to the United States. Just two years ago, he had nothing in his bank accounts, pretty much sends millions, tens of millions of dollars. Where he got that money from, not clear. But that doesn't even matter. I mean, yes, if that money's traced back to the Russians, the Chinese, whatever, I mean, that becomes even more serious. But it, in the simplest terms, it doesn't actually even matter because what you have is a foreigner donating money to the President of the United States and his sons, or investing this money into their company using or into themselves using this conduit company. The money ultimately went into the pockets of the President, as you can see, in his sons. And while any other president would have faced massive, massive congressional investigations. But when you look at money laundering as a whole, the President's own bank accounts were shut down just one, just a few years ago. And we learned one week ago, because of money laundering concerns, because of possible suspicious transactions that would violate the anti money laundering statutes in the United States of America, forcing Capital One to shut down many of these accounts. And so the question remains, how long is the media just going to let this happen without actually doing anything about it, without actually continuing to press on it? See, if I were in a major media company, I would be talking about this every single day. And I wouldn't just let these stories die, which is why I'm talking about it to you. Make sure to hit that subscribe button like comment share. These are the stories that I will never stop covering and I think it's important that people know where the President is getting his money from and whether or not his accounts are open based on money laundering reasons.